Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
OVERVIEW
CSA DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
FOR HML
Jay PuckettRebecca Johnson
Emily Ahearn
Civil and Architectural EngineeringUniversity of Wyoming
AASHTO T-12Sacramento, CA
2010
AASHTO 11.7.2
Band-Limited Flow(disorganized)
Sinusoidal(Organized)
CSA Implementation
Frequency Deflection
Acceleration Mass
BB A C KG R O U N DA C KG R O U N D
MOUNTAIN PLAINS CONSORTIUM RESEARCH:
Use of Wind Power Maps to Establish Fatigue Design Criteria for
Traffic Signal and High-Mast Structures
Traffic Signal Arm
High-Mast Pole
BB A C KG R O U N DA C KG R O U N D
CONCLUSIONS:
TRAFFIC SIGNAL ARMS
HIGH WIND
XHIGH-MAST POLES
PURPOSE:
BB A C KG R O U N DA C KG R O U N D
VORTEX SHEDDING
• Occurs when fluid passed over a bluffed object
• Alternating pressure zones with frequency,
• Across-wind movement
Vortex Overview
Regimes of fluid flow across smooth circular cylinders (Lienhard, 1966)
CSA 2006
Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4
Section
BSection
C
Join
t1
Join
t2
Accelerometer
Accelerometer
56 ft
41 ft
33 ftAnemometer
4x StrainGauges
V-Link
5 ft
Section
A
Mode 1 2 3 4
SAP Natural Freq (Hz) 0.385 1.64 4.22 8.27
Actual Natural Freq (Hz) 0.35 1.5 3.8 7.5
% Difference 9.0% 8.6% 9.9% 9.3%
Damping Ratios (%) 0.5 0.3 0.1 --
HML -- 120 ft.
CSA requires modal analysis
LaramiePole
Wind Characteristics
Original Imagecourtesy ofSymscape'http://www.symscape.com/
CSA 2006
Wind StochasticsF
requency
(%)
Wind Speed, mphMean = 13.7 mph
LaramiePole
Overview
Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4
Secti
on
BS
ecti
on
C
Join
t1
Join
t2
Accelerometer
Accelerometer
56 ft
41 ft
33 ftAnemometer
4x StrainGauges
V-Link
5 ft
Secti
on
A
MathematicalModel =
Load Effect
Fatigue Prediction Model
• Design• Inspection Support• Management Support
Today’s Focus -- CSA
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Acc
ele
rati
on
(g)
Wind Speed (mph)
Crosswind
ExperimentalResults
Height Dcrit
ft in Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4
Mode 4 - Antinode 1 32 18.8 53.5
Mode 3 - Antinode 1 46 16.9 22.9
Mode 4 - Antinode 2 72 13.5 32.4
Mode 2 - Antinode 1 75 13.1 6.2
Mode 3 - Antinode 2 97 10.2 11.8
Mode 4 - Antinode 3 104 9.3 20.6
Mode 1 - Antinode 1 120 7.18 0.72
Critical Velocity at 33 ft (mph)Location
Predicted CriticalVelocity
60 sec average
LaramiePole
Mechanics Overview
Uniform FlowRigid CylinderAerodynamic (no fluid-structure interaction)
Mechanics Overview
Uniform FlowFlexible Cylinder SupportAeroelastic (fluid-structure interaction)
LaramiePole
Mechanics OverviewUniform FlowRigid Prismatic CantileverAerodynamic (no fluid-structure interaction)
Mechanics OverviewUniform FlowFlexible Prismatic CantileverAeroelastic (fluid-structure interaction)
Mechanics OverviewNon uniform FlowFlexible Prismatic CantileverAerodynamic (no fluid-structure interaction)
x
Mechanics OverviewNon uniform FlowFlexible Prismatic CantileverAeroelastic (fluid-structure interaction)
Mechanics OverviewNon uniform FlowFlexible Tapered CantileverAeroelastic (fluid-structure interaction)
wi, miV(x), m, r
Vref
D(x)
CSA OverviewNon uniform FlowFlexible Prismatic CantileverAeroelastic (fluid-structure interaction)
CSA OverviewNon uniform FlowFlexible Tapered CantileverAeroelastic (fluid-structure interaction)
Generalized Coordinates
1. Assume a shape function
U=1
x
m(x)
2. Determine equivalent SDOF
f(x,t)
3. Solve however you wish (linear)CSA Overview
fs(x,t)
CSA Overview
Band-Limited Flow(disorganized)
Sinusoidal(Organized)
Likely we are onlyin larger values
CSA Implementation
Frequency Deflection
Acceleration Mass
• Strouhal Number
• Natural Frequency
• Wind Speed Fit
Vortex SheddingExcitation
• Equation Estimation
• Found from SAPModel by Emily
Modal Shapes• Band-limiting
random process forsmall disp.
• Harmonic Lock-in iflarge
Modal Coefficientof Magnitude
• Velocity “bin size”chosen
• Macros written toloop from low tohigh velocities
Velocity Looping
EXCEL PROGRAMMING
DISPLACEMENTS: A3.2.4.3.1
Luminaire Mass mlum 272.1554 kg 600 lb
Strouhal number S 0.18
RMS Lift Coeff. CL 0.5 bin size lower upper
Band Width B 0.25 1 11 12 mph
Correlation Length L 2.5 4.917 5.364 mps
Air Density ρ 0.929071 kg/m3
0.058 lb/ft3
Structural damping ε 0.005 0.003 0.001 max velocity 50
Natural Frequency ni 0.34 1.5 3.9 (mph)
wind velocity profile α 0.143
Base Diameter Do 24.25 in
tapering angle θ 0.005833 radians
0.3342 degrees
Control Velocity at 10m
velocity ranges (mps)
Set Current to Max
SPREAD SHEET OUTPUT
LaramiePole
COMPARISON OF OUTPUT TO FIELD DATA
Dsmax ~1.8 ksiDmax ~0.9 in
Perforated ShroudPerforated Shroud HDPE net, 45% open area
16 ft long
Covers pole from 89 to 105 ft
Dshroud = 1.25Dpole
Height (ft) Cpole (in) Cshroud (in)
91 33.8 42
95 32.0 40
99 30.3 38
103 28.5 36
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Acc
ele
rati
on
(g)
Wind Speed (mph)
Unretrofitted
Perforated Shroud
Perforated ShroudPerforated ShroudMaximum Acceleration vs. 30s Mean Wind
Speed
END OF TALK
Appendix – not presented
Extra – project description
Analysis ModelCSA, ISU, other
Fat
igu
e-li
feP
red
icti
on
Readily Available Wind DataDesignInspectionModels