Upload
ken
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
1/20
Lgu Name: Ozamiz City
DCF Year: 2011-LGPMS
Basic Profile:
LGU Type: CityIncome Class: 3rd
Population: 131,049
Total Land Area (in has): 16,407.00
No. of Barangays: 51
No. of Households: 26,210
Financial Profile:
IRA Share: Php 345,778,800.00
Local-Sourced Revenues: Php 141,401,278.97Other Revenues: Php 270,514.03
Total LGU Income: Php 487,450,593.00
Ecosystems:
Agricultural Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems
Coastal Marine Ecosystems
Freshwater Ecosystems
Economic Activity:
Rating Name
1 Agricultural
2 Commercial and Service Centers
3 Fishery
4 Industrial
5 Mining
Contact Information:
Name of Mayor or
Governor:HON. NOVA PRINCESS E. PAROJINOG-ECHAVEZ
Telephone Number:
Fax Number: (088) 521 - 1390
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
2/20
Email Address: [email protected]
Website Address: ozamiz.gov.ph
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
3/20
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Ozamiz City, PY 2011
Highlighted in this report is your LGU's performance in four (4) areas of governance: (1) Administrative Governance, (2) SocialGovernance, (3) Economic Governance, and (4) Environmental Governance. A special report is included to determine how thefundamentals of good governance such as Participation, Transparency, and Financial Accountability are valued in the LGU. It is to notethat the LGU's performance was assessed based on the responses of the LGU's Team to the questions provided into the LGPMSdatabase. A Performance Scale is used to identify areas with excellent performance and areas for improvement. A perfect scale of 5denotes excellent performance while performance scales of 1-4 indicate areas for improvement. Although scales of 3 and 4 arerelatively high, there are areas which can still be improved on. All these are explained in detail as you read the entire report.
On Administrative Governance
Administrative Governance looks into six areas: Local Legislation, Development Planning, Revenue Generation, ResourceAllocation and Utilization, Customer Service and Human Resource Management and Development. Your LGU performance in each areaof Administrative Governance is plotted in the graph below.
Area(s) with Excellent Performance
Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 2 out of 6 sub-areas of Administrative Governance. Sustain Performance in thisarea:
Area(s) with ExcellentPerformance
Interpretation
Human ResourceManagement and Development
Managing the human resource is geared towards a desired end which is"desirable organizational performance and productivity".
Customer Service - CivilApplications
Seamless delivery and ease of obtaining frontline services are principal in civilregistry and real property documents.
Area(s) for Improve ment
The areas for improvement are listed by priority, starting from the area which gets the lowest performance scale followed byareas which get higher performance scales, respectively.
Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription
Interpretation
Local Legislation2.75Low
Quality legislation is a hallmark of good local governance. The localgovernment is way off-mark. It bears emphasizing that quality legislation isdesired, deliberate and planned. Accord importance to the building oflegislative staff competence, and the use or the resort to research-basedagenda development, legislative tracking, backstopping committee andlegislative performance.
Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription Interpretation
Revenue Generation4.00High but notExcellent
Existing measures in support of revenue generation need to be enhanced. Thisis an initial yet essential step in maximizing revenue generation potentials.
Priorit Area for Improvement Performance Interpretation
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
4/20
Description
Development Planning4.09High but notExcellent
Improvements in the following areas are underscored: (a) organizationalperformance; (b) consultation process; and (c) management of planningdatabase. These areas are instrumental in quality land use and developmentplanning, or lack of it.
Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription
Interpretation
Resource Allocation and
Utilization
4.50High but not
Excellent
Management and coordination processes for budgeting and accounting are inplace. However, these processes need to be revisited and improved. They are
guarantees to an effective allocation and optimum utilization of financialresources.
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
5/20
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Ozamiz City, PY 2011
Highlighted in this report is your LGU's performance in four (4) areas of governance: (1) Administrative Governance, (2) SocialGovernance, (3) Economic Governance, and (4) Environmental Governance. A special report is included to determine how thefundamentals of good governance such as Participation, Transparency, and Financial Accountability are valued in the LGU. It is to notethat the LGU's performance was assessed based on the responses of the LGU's Team to the questions provided into the LGPMSdatabase. A Performance Scale is used to identify areas with excellent performance and areas for improvement. A perfect scale of 5denotes excellent performance while performance scales of 1-4 indicate areas for improvement. Although scales of 3 and 4 arerelatively high, there are areas which can still be improved on. All these are explained in detail as you read the entire report.
On Economic Governance
Economic Governance looks into three areas: Support to Agriculture Sector, Support to Fishery Services, and Enterprise,Business and Industry Promotion. The report varies according to the nature of economic activities in the locality. Support to agricultureor fishery services are filtered out if not applicable. Your LGU performance in this area is plotted in the graph below.
Area(s) with Excellent Performance
Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 3 sub-areas of Economic Governance. Sustain Performance in thisarea:
Area(s)with ExcellentPerformance
Interpretation
Supportto FisheryServices
A working FARMC. Funding for the fishery sector is fully provided such as on the rehabilitation orconstruction of fishery-related infrastructure, e.g., mariculture park, fish port, sea cages. Credit, productionsupport, research and development, and market development services are available. Most if not all thefisherfolks benefitted from fishery extension and on-site research services or facilities.
Area(s) for Improve ment
The areas for improvement are listed by priority, starting from the area which gets the lowest performance scale followed byareas which get higher performance scales, respectively.
Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription
Interpretation
Entrepreneurship, Business andIndustry Promotion
4.17High but notExcellent
More need to be done to institutionalize a business-friendly environment.Factors such as the following need to be looked into:
Suggested Action(s) to Take
Ensure the ease of doing business. Strategize to effect the issuance of building, occupancy, and business permits in a moreexpedient manner
Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription
Interpretation
Support to Agriculture Sector4.95High but notExcellent
Local government support is extended to the Agriculture Sector. But greaterintervention is necessary.
Suggested Action(s) to Take
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
6/20
Improve infrastructure support, e.g., communal irrigation system, farm-to-market roads, post-harvest facilities
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
7/20
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
8/20
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
9/20
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Ozamiz City, PY 2011
Highlighted in this report is your LGU's performance in four (4) areas of governance: (1) Administrative Governance, (2) SocialGovernance, (3) Economic Governance, and (4) Environmental Governance. A special report is included to determine how thefundamentals of good governance such as Participation, Transparency, and Financial Accountability are valued in the LGU. It is to notethat the LGU's performance was assessed based on the responses of the LGU's Team to the questions provided into the LGPMSdatabase. A Performance Scale is used to identify areas with excellent performance and areas for improvement. A perfect scale of 5denotes excellent performance while performance scales of 1-4 indicate areas for improvement. Although scales of 3 and 4 arerelatively high, there are areas which can still be improved on. All these are explained in detail as you read the entire report.
On Valuing Fundamentals of Governance
This section of the report describes how your LGU values and maintains good governance in the context of Transparency,Participation, and Financial Accountability.
Area(s) with Excellent Performance
Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 1 out of 3 sub-areas of Valuing Fundamentals of Governance. SustainPerformance in this area:
Area(s) withExcellent
PerformanceInterpretation
TransparencyTransparency in governmental operations is remarkable. Communicating to the public through
various means, i.e., Bulletin Board, Public Information Office or Desk, print, broadcast media, website,and forum, is valued.
Area(s) for Improve ment
The areas for improvement are listed by priority, starting from the area which gets the lowest performance scale followed byareas which get higher performance scales, respectively.
Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription
Interpretation
Participation4.33High but notExcellent
Strengthening CSO participation in Local Special Bodies and the CitizenFeedback system, including the maximization of CSO engagement indevelopment projects is a MUST action. There are merits to it. In addition tothe principal of participation, other desirable governance values liketransparency, accountability and consensus-influenced decisions arereinforced.
Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription
Interpretation
Financial Accountability4.81High but notExcellent
Efforts to improve financial accountability are acknowledged. However,administrative capacity to ensure observance of guidelines relative toaccounting, internal control, procurement and financial transactions need to bestrengthened.
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
10/20
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
11/20
e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report
Ozamiz City, PY 2011
Highlighted in this report is your LGU's performance in four (4) areas of governance: (1) Administrative Governance, (2) SocialGovernance, (3) Economic Governance, and (4) Environmental Governance. A special report is included to determine how thefundamentals of good governance such as Participation, Transparency, and Financial Accountability are valued in the LGU. It is to notethat the LGU's performance was assessed based on the responses of the LGU's Team to the questions provided into the LGPMSdatabase. A Performance Scale is used to identify areas with excellent performance and areas for improvement. A perfect scale of 5denotes excellent performance while performance scales of 1-4 indicate areas for improvement. Although scales of 3 and 4 arerelatively high, there are areas which can still be improved on. All these are explained in detail as you read the entire report.
On Environmental Governance
Environmental Governance looks into four areas: Forest Ecosystem Management, Freshwater Ecosystem Management,Coastal Marine Ecosystem Management, and Urban Ecosystem Management. The report varies according to local ecosystems.Ecosystems which are not related to the LGU are filtered out. Your LGU performance in this area is plotted in the graph below.
Area(s) with Excellent Performance
Your LGU is doing an excellent performance in 3 out of 4 sub-areas of Environmental Governance . Sustain Performance inthis area:
Area(s)with ExcellentPerformance
Interpretation
CoastalMarineEcosystemsManagement
Coastal marine ecosystem management is a core concern of the LGU. Long-term planning ispracticed. CSOs and citizens are engaged in coastal marine protection and rehabilitation. Areas forrehabilitation and protection are set, and that target areas for rehabilitation and protection are met.
FreshwaterEcosystemsManagement
Freshwater ecosystem management is of importance to the LGU. Long-term planning is valued.CSO and citizen participation are recognized and are mobilized in fresh water protection and rehabilitation.Areas for rehabilitation and protection are set, and that target areas for rehabilitation and protection are met.
ForestEcosystemsManagement
Forest ecosystem management is central to the concerns of the LGU. Long-term planning isparamount. CSOs and citizens are mobilized in forest protection. Areas for reforestation and protection areset, and that target areas for reforestation and protection are met.
Area(s) for Improve ment
The areas for improvement are listed by priority, starting from the area which gets the lowest performance scale followed byareas which get higher performance scales, respectively.
Priority Area for Improvement PerformanceDescription
Interpretation
Urban EcosystemsManagement
4.33
High but notExcellent
Pollution control and proper solid waste management are essential in
preserving the integrity of the environment. More need to be done. To gainbetter performance in this area, consider the following:
Suggested Action(s) to Take
Prepare, if none has been formulated, or improve the quality of, the Solid Waste Management PlanEnsure that every barangay has a material recovery facilityMove from Open Dumpsite Facility to Controlled Dumpsite Facility to a Sanitary Landfill as the final disposal facility. It makessense. At the ver least, inaction has le al implications. But more tellin are the health and environmental imperatives
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
12/20
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
13/20
Financial Performance e-ReportOzamiz City, PY 2011
Revenue Generation
Interpretation Guide
Indicator:
Cost to Collect Revenues
Computation:
(cost in collecting revenues/total local revenues collected) x 100
Significance: Determines local revenue collection efficiency
Desired performance:
Should be lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Exceptional performance:
Lower for both conditions: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)nationalaverage of the same LGU type regardless of income class
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
14/20
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
15/20
Computation:
[(Locally Sourced Revenues + IRA)/Total LGU Income] x 100
Significance:
Describes reliability of funding sources
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Exceptional performance: Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) national
average of the same LGU type regardless of income class
Interpretation Guide
Indicator:
Locally-Sourced Revenue Level
Computation:
Amount of Locally-Sourced Revenue
Significance:
Describes locally-sourced revenue gap between the LGU and average of LGUs (by LGU type and incomeclass)
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Exceptional performance:
Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) nationalaverage of the same LGU type regardless of income class
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
16/20
Interpretation Guide
Indicator:
Locally-Sourced Revenue Per Capita
Computation: (amount of locally-sourced revenue/population)
Significance:
Describes locally-sourced revenue per capita gap between your LGU and average of LGUs
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Exceptional performance:
Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) nationalaverage of the same LGU type regardless of income class
Interpretation Guide
Indicator:
Real Property Tax (RPT) Accomplishment Rate
Computation:
(Amount of RPT collected/Amount of projected RPT collectibles) x 100
Significance:
RPT is one of the major sources of income of LGUs in general. This indicator determines local revenuecollection effort on RPT.
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
17/20
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Exceptional performance:
Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2) nationalaverage of the same LGU type regardless of income class
Resourced Allocation and Utilization
Interpretation Guide
Indicator:
Personal Services Expenditure Ratio
Computation:
(Personnel services expenditures/Total expenditures) x 100
Significance:
Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of budget allocation
Desired performance:
Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of budget allocation LGU type and income
class. Should not exceed with the ceiling as mandated by law, i.e., for 1st - 3rd class LGUs - 45%, for 4th -6th class LGUS - 55%.
Exceptional performance:
Met these three conditions: (1) lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class,(2) lower than national average of LGUs with the same LGU type regardless of income class, (3) Did notexceed the 45-55 ceiling for P.S.
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
18/20
Interpretation Guide
Indicator:
Total Expenditure Per Capita
Computation:
Total expenditures/population
Significance: Describes how much was actually spent by the LGU in a per capita basis.
Desired performance:
Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class
Exceptional performance:
Should be higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)nationalaverage of the same LGU type regardless of income class.
Interpretation Guide
Indicator:
Debt Service Ratio
Computation:
Actual debt service cost/regular income
Significance:
Considers the proportion of actual debt service costs to total regular income.
Desired performance:
Should not exceed 20% of the regular income. That is the debt servicing limitation set for under LG Code of1991.
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
19/20
8/12/2019 Ozamiz Statistics
20/20