38
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

P16221 – FSAE Shock DynamometerSystem Level Design Review

September 29, 2015

Page 2: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Aung Toe – EE• Jim Holmes – EE– Project Manager

• Sal Fava – ME– Chief Engineer

• Chris Batorski – ME– Facilitator

• Andrew Dodd – ISE

P16221 – MSD Team

Page 3: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Background (5 min)• System Analysis (10 min)• Concept and Architecture Development (5 min)• System Level Proposal (10 min)• Engineering Analysis (15 min)• Risk Assessment (5 min)• Test Plan(how we will meet the specs) (5 min)• Updated Project Plan (5 min)• Question and Answer (15 min)

Agenda

Page 4: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• A shock dynamometer is a measurement device • supply an input displacement vs time profile • measure the response (both displacement and force)

of a damper. • Overall: a tool used by engineers to tune the

suspension and ride quality of a vehicle in any application

Background:What is a Shock Dynamometer?

Page 5: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• The goal of this project – Design a device to characterize dampers – Capable of supplying a displacement input profile in time

and measuring force, displacement, and temperature responses of a damper

– Existing machines will be analyzed for compatibility. If there are no existing machines that will support the damper dyno integration, a new machine will be developed

Background:Problem Statement

Page 6: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

1. Cost less than $3,0002. Able to be moved in the shop easily3. Reproduce damper displacements from track data4. Measure damper forces5. Measure damper shaft position6. Measure damper temperature during test7. Save and recall test data for post processing8. Maximum footprint of 4’ x 4’9. Accommodate wide range of damper sizes

Background:Customer Requirements

Page 7: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Background:Engineering Requirements

Page 8: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Predicted Costs

Page 9: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Predicted Costs

925.48; 51%

390; 21%

500; 28%

Predicted Costs

Controls and Electronics Mechanical: HardwareMechanical: Raw Materials

Page 10: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

House of QualityOverall Picture

1 2

3

4

5

Page 11: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

House of Quality1. Customer Reqs

Page 12: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

House of Quality2. Functional Reqs

Page 13: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

House of Quality3. Inter-relationships

Page 14: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

House of Quality4. Roof

Page 15: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

House of Quality5. Targets

Page 16: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Functional DecompositionDamper Characterization

Accessing Damper/Prep Test Running Test Data Collection User Safety/Results Output

Page 17: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Functional DecompositionAccessing Damper/Test Prep

Page 18: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Functional DecompositionRunning Test

Page 19: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Functional DecompositionData Collection

Page 20: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Functional DecompositionUser Safety/Result Output

Page 21: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

System Level DesignConcept

Data

Test Commands

Post Processed

Results

Page 22: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

System Level DesignFlowchart

Page 23: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Morph Chart

Page 24: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Morph Chart Cont.

Page 25: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015
Page 26: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Ball Screw Actuation• Capable of track data input profile– >10 in/s shaft speed– >1500 lbf input force

System Level Proposal

Page 27: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Cam/Rotary type motor sizing• Memory Requirements• Microprocessor Read Speed Testing• Serial Speed Analysis• Load Cell Analysis

Engineering Analysis

Page 28: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Determine a power requirement– Inputs

• 10 in/s shaft speed• 1500 lbf load capability

– Output• 2.72 Hp

– Conclusion• Need a 3-5 Hp motor

Cam/Rotary motor

Page 29: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Calculate memory requirements for data acquisition– Inputs

• Track data sampled at 500 Hz (0.002 seconds between samples)• Data consists of a pair of numbers (time, displacement)

– Outputs• 1,800,001 samples• 13.74 MB requirement

– Conclusion• Eliminate time and send measurements at a constant 0.002• Record 1-5 minutes of data and send to PC in chunks

Memory

Page 30: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Read Speed Test– Simulated series of analog input reads– ATmega328P-XMINI– Results

• Mean 339.3 us• Min 332 us• Max 432 us

– Conclusion• Should have plenty of time to control actuator at 125Hzcontrol

speed• 5 variables in sketch took 16% of available stack space

Microprocessor

Page 31: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Serial Speed Analysis– Inputs

• Memory Requirements (64 bits of data in 0.002s)

– Output• 32,000 bits/s

– Conclusion- feasible baud rates:• 28400• 57600• 115200

RS-232

Page 32: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Source a load cell that meets required specifications– Inputs

• 1500 lbf @ 500 Hz• No measurement phase lag• (+) and (-) force measurement capabilities• < $1000

– Output• PCB 1403-14A/084A100

– Conclusion• Exceeds all physical requirements• Need a discount or sponsor (> $1000)

Load Cell

Page 33: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Risk Assessment

Page 34: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Emergency circuit breakers– Open enclosure door, verify the system stopped– Press emergency switch, verify the system stopped

• Sensor measurements – Force (give a known weight – get the reading) – Temperature (measure room temperature)– Position (command to move to a known distance –

measure)– Verify the measurements are within acceptable range

Test Plan

Page 35: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Data collection speed (~250 Hz – 4ms period)– Collect data from the sensors and time taken

• Track frequency (~125 Hz – 8ms period)– Command the controller to move a period within 8 ms– Verify the frequency from sensor data

• Variable stroke range– Command the controller to vary the stroke range – Verify with the reading from linear potentiometer

• Data format– Verify .csv format in file system

Test Plan

Page 36: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

• Replay track data– Use the data from .csv and produce graphs

• Sturdy base and mounting to withstand vibrations– Apply 100 lbs to top, measure deflection (<0.005in)

• Eye-to-eye distance/ overall footprint– Tape measurements

• Mobility– Customer judgement: 1 (zero mobility) – 10 (excellent

mobility)

Test Plan

Page 37: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Updated Project Plan

Page 38: P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015

Questions?