19
Page 1 AEM Board Meeting August 2007 Climate Change Calculations And Implications John T. Disharoon Sustainable Development Manager Caterpillar Inc.

Page 1 AEM Board Meeting August 2007 Climate Change Calculations And Implications John T. Disharoon Sustainable Development Manager Caterpillar Inc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

Climate Change Calculations And Implications

John T. Disharoon

Sustainable Development Manager

Caterpillar Inc.

Page 2

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

• Caterpillar has a credible reputation as a global company concerned about the environment … but good environmental stewardship calls on business to do all it can to protect the environment.

• Shape the debate… look out not only for our interests but the interests of our customers (like Clean Coal Technologies).

• Global perspective - Caterpillar is positioned to work for consistent climate change policies across the board.

Climate Change

Page 3

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

Not a linear activity

Must take into account all aspects of:

• Energy Security (available when you need it, where you need it, in the quantity you need it)

• Energy Competitiveness ($ per KwH)

• Environmental effects

Climate Change3- Dimensional Chess?

Page 4

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

International Response

Sources: World Resources Institute and Pew Centre on Global Climate Change

CO2 trading USD $26-35/metric ton since March ‘07

CO2 trading USD $26-35/metric ton since March ‘07

What Is Known > International Responses To Climate Change• EU – GHG allowance allocations

tightening 2008 - 2012 (Kyoto)

– EU ETS “warm-up” phase: 05-07

– ~12,000 installations covering 46% of CO2 emissions

• Australia – mandatory GHG reporting in 2008

– ETS by 2011

• China - speed up implementation of laws/regulations to cut GHGs

• India - drafting national strategy on measures to cut GHGs by YE2007

33

Cumulative CO2 emissions reductions from IGSM model: 550 ppmv CO2 stabilization

Non-Annex 1

Annex 1

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Year

Gig

ato

nn

es o

f C

O2

Page 5

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

US Response – 11 Bills On The Floors Of Congress

Sources: World Resources Institute and Pew Centre on Global Climate Change

Federal Level – 11 Bills On The Floors Of Congress

GHG Emissions Targets

GHG Reporting Initiatives

What Is Known > US Responses

Regional Climate Initiatives

Page 6

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

Current Climate Bill Discussions

• House:– Speaker Pelosi promising

climate debate in fall session

• Senate:– Bingaman-Specter release

bipartisan bill

– Warner-Lieberman seeking to build on other bills

Page 7

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

CDM

CDM

CDM

CDM

market in operation under caps

market with caps proposed/forthcoming

JI

2011

2012?CDM

What Is Known > Proliferation Of Cap & Trade

market participation through CDM/JI projects

Page 8

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

• Three choices if you operate under a cap:

– Hold emissions below your cap

– Purchase allowances (credits) to emit more

– Pay “carbon tax” to emit above your cap

What Is Known > Implications Of Cap & Trade

51

M IT A llow ance Prices through 2030

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

2005$/ton CO 2

6 .7 G TCO25.9 G TCO25.5 G TCO2

14

USD $20-50/mt CO2

Page 9

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

CDM

CDM

CDM

CDM

CDM

What Is Known > Market Opportunities

Project example:•Sihe Coal Mine, Shanxi Province, China

•90 MW total installed capacity

•Project produces ~ 648GWh of electricity/yr worth USD $21.4M

•15M emissions reductions credits (~2.1M/yr) worth USD $39.7M

Value of emissions reductions credits:

• 738 CDM projects registered to date

• Average annual reduction ~ 157M mtCO2e

• Credits worth USD $3B/yr

• Total credits (968M) through 2012 worth USD $18B

Project registrations increasing

Page 10

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

What Is Not Known

• Specific form that federal, regional and/or state regulations (incl. cap & trade) will take in US

– Regulate the manufacturer?

– Regulate the customer/industry sector?

• Specific timeframes when regulations will enter force

– RGGI to enter force in 2009; 9 states; min 25% auction; 5 states plan 100% auction

• How US carbon market will interface with non-US markets (EU, Australia, etc.)

• How major non-Annex I emitters (e.g. China, India) will be dealt with post-2012 (post Kyoto)

• Specific price of carbon in a “global” market

Page 11

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

What Is Known > Caterpillar Response

1. Mandatory approaches to reduce GHG emissions from the major emitting sectors

2. Flexible approaches to establish a price signal for carbon

3. Incentives to encourage actions by other countries, including large emitting economies in the developing world, to implement GHG emission reduction strategies

Page 12

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

US-CAP Engagement and Expansion

18 NewMembers

• Several members have testified

• Warner-Lieberman soliciting input

• Membership expanded to more than 30 companies (market cap: $1.9 trillion)

Page 13

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

Six Principles:

1. Account for the global dimensions of climate change; 2. Create incentives for technology innovation; 3. Be environmentally effective; 4. Create economic opportunity and advantage; 5. Be fair to sectors disproportionately impacted; and 6. Reward early action.

Page 14

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

                                     

Thank You

Page 15

AEM Board Meeting August 2007

                                     

9

Kyoto Protocol• Specifies legally binding emission

limits for industrialized countries, relative to 1990 levels, over 2008-2012.

• Countries are free to trade their requirements, as well as bank them for future use.

• Can generate credits through projects in developing countries (Clean Development Mechanism or CDM) that can be applied to industrialized country commitments.

• Came into force on February 16, 2005, without the U.S. or Australia.

• Compliance with current commitments, as well as possibility of future targets, unclear

10

Kyoto Protocol

11

European Union

• Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) for energy activities (including electric power), iron & steel, minerals, pulp and paper. “warm-up” phase: 05-07, Kyoto: 08-12

• ~12,000 installations covering 46% of CO2 emissions

• 25 Member States (MS) propose allocation and cap in National Allocation Plans (NAP)

13

California

• AB 1493 – regulating CO2 from cars

• AB 32 – regulating statewide emissions

• Efforts also underway to form regional compact to limit emissions

• EO S-01-07 – low carbon fuel standard

14

Regional GHG Initiative (RGGI)

• Regional cap and trade program proposed by former Governor Pataki

• To begin in 2009

• Nine states in New England and Mid-Atlantic have joined (2007: MA back in; RI will likely follow; MD to join)

• Minimum 25% auction required; Five states plan 100% auction.