48
Page 1 Lecture 3 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 1

Lecture 3Lecture 3

Part 1: Finish Geometrical OpticsPart 1: Finish Geometrical OpticsPart 2: Physical OpticsPart 2: Physical Optics

Claire MaxUC Santa Cruz

January 15, 2012

Page 2: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 2

AberrationsAberrations

• In optical systems

• In atmosphere

• Description in terms of Zernike polynomials

• Based on slides by Brian Bauman, LLNL and UCSC, and Gary Chanan, UCI

Page 3: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 3

Zernike PolynomialsZernike Polynomials

• Convenient basis set for expressing wavefront aberrations over a circular pupil

• Zernike polynomials are orthogonal to each other

• A few different ways to normalize – always check definitions!

Page 4: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 4

Page 5: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 5

Piston

Tip-tilt

From G. Chanan

Page 6: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 6

Astigmatism(3rd order)

Defocus

Page 7: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 7

Trefoil

Coma

Page 8: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 8

Spherical

“Ashtray”

Astigmatism(5th order)

Page 9: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 9

Page 10: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 10

Units: Radians of phase / (D / r0)5/6

Reference: Noll

Tip-tilt is single biggest contributor

Focus, astigmatism, coma also big

High-order terms go on and on….

Page 11: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 11

Page 12: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 12

References for Zernike References for Zernike PolynomialsPolynomials

•Pivotal Paper: Noll, R. J. 1976, “Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence”, JOSA 66, page 207

• Hardy, Adaptive Optics, pages 95-96

Page 13: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 13

LetLet’’s get back to design of AO s get back to design of AO systems systems Why on earth does it look like Why on earth does it look like this ??this ??

Page 14: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 14

Considerations in the optical Considerations in the optical design of AO systems: pupil relaysdesign of AO systems: pupil relays

Pupil Pupil Pupil

Deformable mirror and Shack-Hartmann lenslet array should be ““optically conjugate to optically conjugate to the telescope pupil.the telescope pupil.””

What does this mean?mean?

Page 15: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 15

Define some termsDefine some terms

• “Optically conjugate” = “image of....”

• “Aperture stop” = the aperture that limits the bundle of rays accepted by the optical system

• “Pupil” = image of aperture stop

optical axis

object space image space

symbol for aperture stopsymbol for aperture stop

Page 16: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 16

So now we can translate:So now we can translate:

• ““The deformable mirror should be optically The deformable mirror should be optically conjugate to the telescope pupilconjugate to the telescope pupil””

meansmeans

• The surface of the deformable mirror is an The surface of the deformable mirror is an image of the telescope pupilimage of the telescope pupil

wherewhere

• The pupil is an image of the aperture stop The pupil is an image of the aperture stop – In practice, the pupil is usually the primary mirror of In practice, the pupil is usually the primary mirror of

the telescopethe telescope

Page 17: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 17

Considerations in the optical Considerations in the optical design of AO systems: design of AO systems: ““pupil pupil relaysrelays””

Pupil Pupil Pupil

‘PRIMARY MIRROR

Page 18: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 18

Typical optical design of AO Typical optical design of AO systemsystem

telescope primary mirror

Science camera

Pair of matched off-axis parabola mirrors

Wavefront sensor (plus

optics)Beamsplitter

Deformable mirror

collimated

Page 19: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 19

More about off-axis parabolasMore about off-axis parabolas

• Circular cut-out of a parabola, off optical axis

• Frequently used in matched pairs (each cancels out the off-axis aberrations of the other) to first collimate light and then refocus it

SORL

Page 20: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 20

Concept Question: what elementary optical Concept Question: what elementary optical calculations would you have to do, to lay out calculations would you have to do, to lay out this AO system? (Assume you know telescope this AO system? (Assume you know telescope parameters, DM size)parameters, DM size)

telescope primary mirror

Science camera

Pair of matched off-axis parabola mirrors

Wavefront sensor (plus

optics)Beamsplitter

Deformable mirror

collimated

Page 21: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 21

Levels of models in opticsLevels of models in optics

Geometric optics - rays, reflection, refraction

Physical optics (Fourier optics) - diffraction, scalar waves

Electromagnetics - vector waves, polarization

Quantum optics - photons, interaction with matter, lasers

Page 22: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 22

Part 2: Fourier (or Physical) OpticsPart 2: Fourier (or Physical) Optics

Wave description: diffraction, interference

Diffraction of light by a circular aperture

Page 23: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 23

MaxwellMaxwell’’s Equations: Light as an s Equations: Light as an electromagnetic wave (Vectors!)electromagnetic wave (Vectors!)

Page 24: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 24

Light as an EM waveLight as an EM wave

• Light is an electromagnetic wave phenomenon, E and B are perpendicular

• We detect its presence because the EM field interacts with matter (pigments in our eye, electrons in a CCD, …)

Page 25: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 25

Physical Optics is based upon the Physical Optics is based upon the scalar Helmholtz Equation (no scalar Helmholtz Equation (no polarization)polarization)

• In free space

• Traveling waves

• Plane waves

kHelmholtz Eqn., Fourier domain

Page 26: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 26

Dispersion and phase velocityDispersion and phase velocity

• In free space

– Dispersion relation k (ω) is linear function of ω– Phase velocity or propagation speed = ω/ k = c = const.

• In a medium– Plane waves have a phase velocity, and hence a

wavelength, that depends on frequency

– The “slow down” factor relative to c is the index of refraction, n (ω)

Page 27: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 27

Optical path – FermatOptical path – Fermat’’s s principleprinciple

• Huygens’ wavelets

• Optical distance to radiator:

• Wavefronts are iso-OPD surfaces

• Light ray paths are paths of least* time (least* OPD)

*in a local minimum sense

Page 28: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 28 Credit: James E. Harvey, Univ. Central Florida

What is Diffraction?What is Diffraction?

In diffraction, apertures of an optical system limit the spatial extent of the wavefront

Aperture

Light that has passed thru aperture, seen on screen downstream

Page 29: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 29 29

Diffraction TheoryDiffraction Theory

We know this

Wavefront UU

What is UU here?

Page 30: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 30

Diffraction as one consequence of Diffraction as one consequence of HuygensHuygens’’ Wavelets: Part 1 Wavelets: Part 1

Every point on a wave front acts as a source of tiny wavelets that move forward.

Huygens’ wavelets for an infinite plane wave

Page 31: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 31

Diffraction as one consequence of Diffraction as one consequence of HuygensHuygens’’ Wavelets: Part 2 Wavelets: Part 2

Every point on a wave front acts as a source of tiny wavelets that move forward.

Huygens’ wavelets when part of a plane wave is blocked

Page 32: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 32

Diffraction as one consequence of Diffraction as one consequence of HuygensHuygens’’ Wavelets: Part 3 Wavelets: Part 3

Every point on a wave front acts as a source of tiny wavelets that move forward.

Huygens’ wavelets for a slit

Page 33: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

From Don Gavel

Page 34: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 34

The size of the slit (relative to a The size of the slit (relative to a wavelenth) matterswavelenth) matters

Page 35: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 35

Rayleigh rangeRayleigh range

• Distance where diffraction overcomes paraxial beam propagation

L

D λ / D)

Page 36: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 36

Fresnel NumberFresnel Number

• Number of Fresnel zones across the beam diameter

L

D λ/D)

Page 37: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 37

Fresnel vs. Fraunhofer Fresnel vs. Fraunhofer diffractiondiffraction

• Very far from a point source, wavefronts almost plane waves.

• Fraunhofer approximation valid when source, aperture, and detector are all very far apart (or when lenses are used to convert spherical waves into plane waves)

• Fresnel regime is the near-field regime: the wave fronts are curved, and their mathematical description is more involved.

S

P

Page 38: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 38

Regions of validity for diffraction Regions of validity for diffraction calculationscalculations

The farther you are from the slit, the easier it is to calculate the diffraction pattern

Near field Fresnel Fraunhofer (Far Field)

D

L

Page 39: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

mask

Credit: Bill Molander, LLNL

Page 40: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 40

Fraunhofer diffraction equationFraunhofer diffraction equation

F is Fourier Transform

Page 41: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 41

Fraunhofer diffraction, continuedFraunhofer diffraction, continued

• In the “far field” (Fraunhofer limit) the diffracted field U2 can be computed from the incident field U1 by a phase factor times the Fourier transform of U1

• “Image plane is Fourier transform of pupil plane”

F is Fourier Transform

Page 42: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 42

Image plane is Fourier transform Image plane is Fourier transform of pupil planeof pupil plane

• Leads to principle of a “spatial filter”

• Say you have a beam with too many intensity fluctuations on small spatial scales

– Small spatial scales = high spatial frequencies

• If you focus the beam through a small pinhole, the high spatial frequencies will be focused at larger distances from the axis, and will be blocked by the pinhole

Page 43: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 43 Don Gavel

Depth of focusDepth of focus

D

fλ/ D

f

λλ 2

22

D

f

DfD

f

δ

Page 44: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012
Page 45: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 45

Details of diffraction from circular Details of diffraction from circular apertureaperture

1) Amplitude

2) Intensity

First zero at r = 1.22 λ/ D

FWHM λ/ D

Page 46: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Rayleigh resolution

limit:Θ = 1.22 λ/D

2 unresolved point sources

Resolved

Credit: Austin Roorda

Page 47: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 47

Diffraction pattern from Diffraction pattern from hexagonal Keck telescopehexagonal Keck telescope

Ghez: Keck laser guide star AO

Stars at Galactic Center

Page 48: Page 1 Lecture 3 Part 1: Finish Geometrical Optics Part 2: Physical Optics Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 15, 2012

Page 48

Conclusions:Conclusions:In this lecture, you have In this lecture, you have learned …learned …

• Light behavior is modeled well as a wave phenomena (Huygens, Maxwell)

• Description of diffraction depends on how far you are from the source (Fresnel, Fraunhofer)

• Geometric and diffractive phenomena seen in the lab (Rayleigh range, diffraction limit, depth of focus…)

• Image formation with wave optics