13
SPENCER SWARTZ Vice President, Energy & Government Relations, Brussels FLEISHMAN-HILLARD October 2012 PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW FOCUSED ON BIOFUELS

PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

SPENCER SWARTZ Vice President, Energy & Government Relations, Brussels FLEISHMAN-HILLARD October 2012

PALM OIL IN EUROPE – A REGULATORY OVERVIEW FOCUSED ON BIOFUELS

Page 2: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

2

One of the world’s biggest public affairs/government relations.

Headquartered and founded (1946) in St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Member of Omnicom Group, the leading global advertising, marketing and corporate communications firm

FH: No. 1 in Quality Ranking (Thomas Harris Survey / Impulse Research) for 12 years

FH: strong credentials in biofuel/biomass sector from past work with Brazil and Indonesia and animal waste industry.

FLEISHMAN -HILLARD AT A GLANCE

Page 3: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

3

Europe, Middle East and Africa

Abu Dhabi Amsterdam Berlin Brussels Dubai Dublin Frankfurt Johannesburg London Madrid

Milan Moscow Munich Riyadh Paris Prague Warsaw

Asia Pacific

Bangalore Beijing Guangzhou Hong Kong

Jakarta Kuala Lumpur Manila Mumbai New Delhi Seoul Shanghai Singapore Sydney Tokyo

AFFILIATES Bogotá Buenos Aires Caracas Guatemala City Guayaquil La Paz

Lima

Panama City Quito Rio de Janeiro San José Santiago Santo Domingo São Paulo

AFFILIATES Accra Athens Bucharest Budapest Cape Verde Copenhagen Dar-Es-Salaam Helsinki Istanbul Johannesburg Kampala Lagos Lisbon Ljubljana Luanda Lusaka Maputo Nairobi Port Louis Sofia Ski Stockholm Tel Aviv Vienna Vilnius Zurich

AFFILIATES Auckland Bangkok Brisbane Hanoi Ho Chi Ming City Karachi Taipei

United States

Atlanta Austin Boston Charlotte Chicago Cleveland Dallas Detroit Houston Indianapolis Kansas City Little Rock Los Angeles Minneapolis/St. Paul New York Orange County Portland Raleigh-Durham Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Washington, D.C.

Canada

Calgary Montreal Ottawa Toronto Vancouver

Latin America

Mexico City Miami San Juan

F L E I S H M A N - H I L L A R D O F F I C E S WO R L D W I D E

Page 4: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

4

EUROPEAN BIOFUEL BACKGROUND

STATE OF BIOFUEL POLICY IN EUROPE TODAY

THE U-TURN ON BIOFUELS – THE IMPACT OF NGO PRESSURE

EUROPEAN COMMISSION PROPOSAL ON INDIRECT LAND USE CHANGE (ILUC) *ILUC FACTORS – REAL TROUBLE FOR PALM OIL

EU POLICY PROCESS ON ILUC

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF EC ILUC POLICY IN EU?

SUMMARY

CONTENTS

Page 5: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

5

EU Biofuel Market: about $22 billion/year industry; roughly 20% Ethanol and 80% Biodiesel (BD, about 70% rapeseed, 19% palm oil).

European vehicle fleet: about 65% diesel and rising (thus, biodiesel-favored market)

2009 EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED) creates European market for biofuels + world’s toughest sustainable criteria.

Key RED provision: 10% of transport fuel in Europe by 2020 should come from renewables; first-generation (1G) biofuels widely expected to fulfill requirement.

Fuel Quality Directive, amended in 2009, requires 6% reduction in GHG emissions in transport by 2020 vs 2010 among oil suppliers/blenders.

NGO Pressure, play dominant role in influencing EU and EU Member States on environmental/energy issues, particularly biofuels and palm oil.

K E Y E U RO P EA N B I O F U E L BAC KG RO U N D

Page 6: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

6

T H E U - T U R N O N B I O F U E L S – A N D A G A I N S T PA L M O I L/ V EG O I L S

Page 7: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

7

European Commission (Sept-Oct): Draft proposal on Indirect Land Use Change and Biofuels (cap food-based biofuels at 5% in transport fuel, eg). Highly negative implications for use of palm oil and other vegetable oils.

French Government (Sept): Proposal that use of food-based biofuels to be capped at 7% in transport by 2020.

OECD (Sept): Urges end to European and US biofuel mandates to lower perceived pressure on food prices.

UN FAO (Aug): Urges “rethink” on biofuels policy in Europe/US.

T H E U - T U R N / M OV I N G O F T H E G OA L P O ST O N B I O F U E L S I N E U RO P E

Page 8: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

8

1) Cap market share of 1st generation biofuels (1G) at 5% of transport fuel in Europe; *1G accounted for 4.5% of European transport fuel in 2011) *EU has 10% renewable fuel transport target; other 5% of target to come from cellulosic/non-food sources.

2) Impose ILUC “factors” (apply “indirect” GHG emissions) to biofuels; vegetable oil feedstocks hit hardest; apply to EU Fuel Quality Directive. Ethanol favored over Biodiesel.

3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies after 2020.

4) Biofuels from waste/residue to be promoted and their GHG savings will be quadruple-counted to meet RED requirements. Unknown: how are PFAD and stearin classified? Still no EU list of Waste/Residues.

E U RO P EA N CO M M I S S I O N I LU C P RO P O SA L I N M O R E D E TA I L

Page 9: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

9 E U RO P EA N CO M M I S S I O N I LU C P RO P O SA L I N M O R E D E TA I L

PROPOSED ILUC “FACTORS” TO APPLY TO FQD

ILUC factors would apply legally 2018-2020, but market reaction likely much sooner.

Vegetable Oil Crops (palm oil, soya, rapeseed) (BIODIESEL)

Sugars (sugar beet, eg) (ETHANOL)

Cereals/other starch rich crops (corn, eg) (ETHANOL)

CROP GROUP

55 gCO2/MJ

13 gCO2/MJ

12 gCO2/MJ

ILUC (“INDIRECT”) EMISSIONS

FQD compliance still doable

FQD compliance impossible

Page 10: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

10 EU POLICY PROCESS ON ILUC

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ILUC policy Sept-Oct 2012

(two years delayed)

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Debate end 2012-2013

EUROPEAN COUNCIL (Member States)

Debate end-2012/2013

EP/COUNCIL Co-Decide Issue

EU ILUC POLICY? Perhaps mid/late 2013 or

2014

1

2

3

Page 11: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

11

Product Labeling: EU Food Information for Consumers Regulation. All vegetable oils need to be listed on food labels by 2014. Will Member States follow letter and spirit of directive? Require quantity of palm oil used?

Various French retailers, under NGO pressure, labeling “palm oil free” on various household goods. French government could try to make this market development a legal requirement in France to cater to left-wing of party.

Germany: Federal Elections Sept 2013. Anti-palm oil Social Democrats could regain power. Social Democrats tried but failed to promote palm oil declaration in food/cosmetics in 2010. A new effort at declaration if SD elected?

W I D E R I M P L I C AT I O N S O F EC I LU C P O L I C Y I N OT H E R E U P O L I C Y A R EA S ?

Page 12: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

12

Palm oil/veg oils are fighting for survival in EU biofuel market. Anti-palm oil is easy politics in Europe; few friends in European policy circles.

Negative implications could spread: left-wing governments, as in France, could demand new palm oil requirements in other sectors.

European Commission ILUC proposal: end of the beginning; mid-2013 likely earliest before European Parliament and European Council (where member states are represented) make decisions.

For 2013, industry needs to find narrative to tell how palm oil sustainability processes have improved/are improving, particularly in Malaysia (methane capture and increased land use controls, as two examples). Combat food vs fuel argument.

Sustained engagement on many levels imperative: EU institutions, key Member State actors, and certain NGOs.

SUMMARY

Page 13: PALM OIL IN EUROPE A REGULATORY OVERVIEW …mpoc.org.my/upload/RWAEP3_SpencerSwartz_POTSKL2012.pdf · Ethanol favored over Biodiesel. 3) 1G biofuel investments would lose public subsidies

13 13

Thank you for your attention.

[email protected]