PARENT CONNECTION MEETINGMay 7, 2014

AGENDA

Welcome

Good News – Chemistry, Shelby Hubbell, Craigs Cruisers, any other?

School Improvement Plan

Federal Grant On-time Graduation Program

Plan Data and Focus Group

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Look and Discuss – Add suggestions for improvement

ON-TIME GRADUATION PROJECT

Your school has been assigned to Wave 2.  This means that data collection will begin in spring of this school year and implementation of EWIMS will begin in the fall of 2015. The evaluation team will be in touch shortly to discuss the timeline and procedures for data collection as part of the research component of this project.  As we approach the fall of 2015, the implementation team will follow up with you to discuss next steps for implementing EWIMS.

 

STUDENT SURVEY RESULTS (N=385)# Question A B C D Blank

1 On a scale of 1 (not helpful) to 4 (very helpful), to what degree has the use of iPads helped your learning in class?

6517%

Not Help

14638%

Somewhat

8622%

Helpful

359%

Very Helpful

5314%Blank

2 To what extent do you use the iPads in your English Class?

7620%

Not At All

20453%

Somewhat

5113%Often

10%

All the Time

5314%Blank

3 To what extent do you use the iPads in your Math Class?

17144%

Not at All

9023%

Somewhat

5214%Often

195%

All the Time

5314%Blank

4 To what extent do you use the iPads in your Science Class?

5113%

Not at All

9324%

Somewhat

12131%Often

6717%

All the Time

5314%Blank

5 To what extent do you use the iPads in your Social Studies Class?

174%

Not at All

3710%

Somewhat

9725%Often

17846%

All the Time

5615%Blank

6 To what extent do you use the iPads in your Elective Classes?

19751%

Not at all

10227%

Somewhat

267%

Often

72%

All the Time

5314%Blank

STUDENT SURVEY RESULTS (N=385)# Question A B C D Blank

7 Would you prefer having textbooks as eBooks on the iPad or a printed book?

14137%

EBooks

13034%

Regular Books

5915%No

Preference

00%

5414%Blank

8 My grades have _______________ as a result of the iPad project.

4913%

Gone Down

4612%

Improved

23661%

Stayed Same

00%

5414% Blank

9 I believe that the iPad distracts me from my school work.

339%

Strongly Disagree

15440%

Disagree

11029%

Agree

298%

Str Agree

5915%Blank

10 I feel that the training that I received in how to use the iPad was informative and helpful.

308%

Strongly Disagree

9525%

Disagree

17846%

Agree

226%

Str Agree

6015%Blank

11 What did you have the most difficulty in learning?

7018%

Downloading E-Books

7025%

Google Docs

12934%

iMovie

5314%

Connecting to a Netwk

6316% Blank

12 My teachers consistently enforce the iPad rules?

205%

Strongly Disagree

6316%

Disagree

18147%

Agree

6016%

Str Agree

6116%Blank

PLAN DATA

Subject (2013-2014) Local NationalEnglish 16.5 16.2Math 17.1 17.6Reading 17.1 16.7Science 18.9 17.8Composite 17.5 17.2

Subject (2013-2014) Local NationalEnglish 18.2 16.4Math 18.2 17.9Reading 18.9 16.9Science 20.7 18.0Composite 19.1 17.5

PHS Grade 9 vs. the Nation (Grade 9)

PHS Grade 10 vs. the Nation (Grade 10)

PLAN DATA BY COHORT

Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 ACT % % % % %

2012-2013 PLAN 10

52% 77% 57% 36% 30%

2010-2011 EXP 8th

56% 72% 51% 42% 16%

Year Composite English Reading Math Science2014-2015 ACT % % % % %

2013-2014 PLAN 10

61% 83% 68% 36% 41%

2012-2013 PLAN 9

46% 69% 51% 25% 23%

2011-2012 EXP 8th

40% 61% 35% 24% 21%Year Composite English Reading Math Science

2015-2016 ACT % % % % %

2014-2015 PLAN 10

% % % % %

2013-2014 PLAN 9

47% 70% 52% 26% 27%

2011-2012 EXP 8th

40% 61% 35% 24% 21%

Current Juniors

Current Sophomores

Current Freshmen

PLAN DATA

Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 10th 61% 83% 68% 36% 41%2013-2014 9th 47% 70% 52% 26% 27%2012-2013 10th 52% 77% 57% 36% 30%2012-2013 9th 46% 69% 51% 26% 23%2011-2012 10th 61% 75% 59% 51% 38%2010-2011 10th*

48% 68% 52% 34% 23%

2009-2010 10th 59% 78% 61% 39% 36%2008-2009 10th 54% 69% 55% 39% 32%

Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 10th 73.5% 78.7% 71.6% 59.2% 80.6%

2013-2014 9th 58.3% 61.5% 60.4% 49.7% 70.6%

2012-2013 10th 67% 72.4% 69% 57.6% 69.5%

2012-2013 9th 57.5% 56.9% 62.3% 49.5% 66.5%

2011-2012 10th 68.6% 69.1% 75% 67.6% 72.9%

2010-2011 10th*

57.3% 49.8% 61.1% 55.9% 58.3%

Percent of Students Above 50th Percentile*2013-14 Not Available

Percent of Students Proficient by Year*2013-14 Not Available

EXPLORE DATA: 8TH GRADE

Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 8th % % % % %

2012-2013 8th 57% 77% 57% 39% 29%

2011-2012 8th 40% 61% 35% 24% 21%

2010-2011 8th* 56% 72% 51% 42% 16%

Year Composite English Reading Math Science2013-2014 8th % % % % %

2012-2013 8th 56.7% 57.1% 68.2% 54.2% 69.3%

2011-2012 8th 50.7% 49.3% 62.7% 63.1% 54.8%

2010-2011 8th* 69.8% 63.7% 65.1% 59.4% 70.8%

Percent of Students Proficient by Year*2013-14 Not Available

Percent of Students Above 50th Percentile*2013-14 Not Available