Upload
vuxuyen
View
234
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Yearbook: 2005-2006
CONCRETE TECHNOLOGYINSTITUTE OF
The
The I
NSTI
TUTE
OF
CO
NC
RETE
TEC
HN
OLO
GY
- Y
earb
oo
k:
2005-2
006
TheINSTITUTE OF CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
4 Meadows Business Park, Blackwater, Camberley, Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel/Fax: 01276 37831Email: [email protected] Website: www.ictech.org
THE ICTThe Institute of Concrete Technologywas formed in 1972 from theAssociation of Concrete Technologists.Full membership is open to all thosewho have obtained the Diploma inAdvanced Concrete Technology. TheInstitute is internationally recognisedand the Diploma has world-wideacceptance as the leading qualificationin concrete technology. The Institutesets high educational standards andrequires its members to abide by a Codeof Professional Conduct, thus enhancingthe profession of concrete technology.The Institute is a Professional Affiliatebody of the UK Engineering Council.
AIMSThe Institute aims to promote concretetechnology as a recognised engineeringdiscipline and to consolidate theprofessional status of practisingconcrete technologists.
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIESIt is the Institute's policy to stimulateresearch and encourage the publicationof findings and to promotecommunication between academic andcommercial organisations. The ICTAnnual Convention includes a TechnicalSymposium on a subject of topicalinterest and these symposia are wellattended both by members and non-members. Many other technicalmeetings are held. The Institute isrepresented on a number of committeesformulating National and InternationalStandards and dealing with policymatters at the highest level. TheInstitute is also actively involved in theeducation and training of personnel inthe concrete industry and thoseentering the profession of concretetechnologist.
Covers ICT 2005 20/8/2005 11:59 am Page 1
ICT RELATED INSTITUTIONS & ORGANISATIONS
ASSOCIATION OFCONSULTING ENGINEERSAlliance House12 Caxton StreetLondon SW1H 0QLTel: 020 7222 6557www.acenet.co.uk
ASSOCIATION OF INDUSTRIALFLOORING CONTRACTORS33 Oxford StreetLeamington SpaCV32 4RATel: 01926 833 633www.acifc.org.uk
ASSOCIATION OF LIGHTWEIGHTAGGREGATE MANUFACTURERSWellington StRipleyDerbyshire DE5 3DZTel: 01773 746111
BRE (BUILDING RESEARCHESTABLISHMENT) LTDBucknalls LaneGarstonWatford WD25 9XXTel: 01923 664000www.bre.co.uk
BRITISH BOARD OF AGRÉMENTP.O.Box 195Bucknalls LaneGarstonWatfordHerts WD25 9BATel: 01923 665300www.bbacerts.co.uk
BRITISH CEMENT ASSOCIATION4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 608700www.bca.org.uk
BRITISH PRECASTCONCRETE FEDERATION60 Charles StreetLeicester LE1 1FBTel: 0116 253 6161www.britishprecast.org.uk
BSI STANDARDSBritish Standards House389 Chiswick High RoadLondon W4 4ALTel: 020 8996 9000www.bsi.org.uk
BRITPAVEBritish In-Situ ConcretePaving Association4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 33160www.britpave.org.uk
CEMENT ADMIXTURES ASSOCIATION38a Tilehouse Green LaneKnowleWest MidlandsB93 9EYTel: 01564 776362
CEMENTITIOUS SLAG MAKERS ASSOCIATIONCroudace HouseGoldstone RoadCaterhamSurrey CR3 6XQTel: 01883 331071www.ukcsma.co.uk
CONCRETE ADVISORY SERVICE4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 607140www.concrete.org.uk
CONCRETE BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT GROUP4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 33777www.cbdg.org.uk
CONCRETE INFORMATION LTD4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 608770www.concrete-info.com
CONCRETE REPAIR ASSOCIATIONAssociation House99 West StFarnhamSurrey GU9 7ENTel: 01252 739145www.cra.org.uk
THE CONCRETE CENTRE4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 606800www.concretecentre.com
THE CONCRETE SOCIETY4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 607140www.concrete.org.uk
CONSTRUCT4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 38444www.construct.org.uk
CIRIAConstruction Industry Research& Information Association
6 Storey’s GateWestminsterLondon SW1P 3AUTel: 020 7222 8891www.ciria.org.uk
CORROSION PREVENTION ASSOCIATIONAssociation House99 West StFarnhamSurrey GU9 7ENTel: 01252 739145www.corrosionprevention.org.uk
INSTITUTE OF CORROSIONCorrosion HouseVimy CourtLeighton BuzzardBeds LU7 1FG Tel: 01525 851771www.icorr.org
INSTITUTE OF MATERIALSMINERALS & MINING1 Carlton House TerraceLondon SW1Y 5DBTel: 020 7451 7300www.materials.org.uk
INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERSOne Great George StreetLondon SW1P 3AATel: 020 7222 7722www.ice.org.uk
INSTITUTION OF HIGHWAYS& TRANSPORTATION6 Endsleigh StreetLondon WC1H 0DZTel: 020 7387 2525www.iht.org
INSTITUTION OFROYAL ENGINEERSBrompton BarracksChathamKent ME4 4UGTel: 01634 842669
INSTITUTION OFSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERS11 Upper Belgrave StreetLondon SW1X 8BHTel: 020 7235 4535www.istructe.org.uk
INTERPAVEConcrete Block Paving Association60 Charles StreetLeicester LE1 1FBTel: 0116 253 6161www.paving.org.uk
MORTAR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION38-44 Gillingham StreetLondon SW1V IHUTel: 020 7963 8000www.mortar.org.uk
QSRMCQuality Scheme for ReadyMixed Concrete1 Mount Mews High Street, HamptonMiddlesex TW12 2SHTel: 020 8941 0273www.qsrmc.co.uk
QUARRY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION38-44 Gillingham StreetLondon SW1V IHUTel: 020 7963 8000www.qpa.org
RIBARoyal Institute of British Architects66 Portland PlaceLondon W1B 1ADTel: 020 7580 5533www.architecture.com
SOCIETY OF CHEMICAL INDUSTRY14/15 Belgrave SquareLondon SW1X 8PSTel: 020 7598 1500www.sci.mond.org
UNITED KINGDOM ACCREDITATION SERVICE21-47 High StreetFelthamMiddlesex TW13 4UNTel: 020 8917 8400www.ukas.org.uk
UNITED KINGDOM CAST STONE ASSOCIATION4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 608771www.ukcsa.co.uk
UNITED KINGDOM QUALITY ASH ASSOCIATIONRegent HouseBath AvenueWolverhamptonWV1 4EGTel: 01902 576 586www.ukqaa.org.uk
89
Published by:THE INSTITUTE OF
CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY4 Meadows Business Park,
Blackwater, Camberley, Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel/Fax: 01276 37831Email: [email protected]
Website: www.ictech.org
ICT YEARBOOK 2005-2006
EDITORIAL COMMITTEE
Professor Peter C. Hewlett (Chairman)BRITISH BOARD OF AGRÉMENT LTD
& UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE
Peter C. OldhamCHRISTEYNS UK LTD
Dr. Bill PriceLAFARGE CEMENT UK
Graham TaylorINSTITUTE OF CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
Laurence E. PerkisINITIAL CONTACTS
Rights reserved. No part of this publication maybe reproduced or transmitted in any formwithout the prior written consent of the
publisher. The comments expressed in thispublication are those of the Author and not
necessarily those of the ICT.
ISSN 1366 - 4824£50.00
Engineering CouncilProfessional Affiliate
Covers ICT 2005 20/8/2005 11:59 am Page 2
3
Yearbook: 2005-2006
CONCRETE TECHNOLOGYINSTITUTE OF
The
CONTENTS PAGE
PRESIDENT’S PERSPECTIVE 5By Rob GaimsterPresident, INSTITUTE OF CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
THE INSTITUTE 6
COUNCIL, OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES 7
FACE TO FACE 9 - 11A personal interview with incoming president Bryan Marsh
MILESTONES IN THE HISTORY OF CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY: 13 - 18A LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF PRECAST CONCRETE:By Martin Clarke
ANNUAL CONVENTION SYMPOSIUM: 19 - 84PAPERS PRESENTED 2005
ADVANCED CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY DIPLOMA: 85 - 87SUMMARIES OF PROJECT REPORTS 2004
RELATED INSTITUTIONS & ORGANISATIONS 89
4
55
PRESIDENT’S PERSPECTIVE
It is once again my pleasure to welcome you to
the Institute’s Yearbook, and I trust you find
the contents interesting and informative. Whilst we
are still effectively a small-in-size institute, the
contents show that the scope of our members’ and
associates’ operations is indeed quite wide and
deep.
The year just gone has been, as with the
previous years, one of change in the various
industrial, education and research sectors which
use concrete technology and technologists. The
continuing process of takeovers, mergers and
consolidation can be unsettling for personal and
professional aspects but I am pleased to hear that
for the vast majority of our members working life
continues as normal. What were areas of
pessimism have now turned to optimism as the use
of concrete materials and products continue to
increase, which brings with it areas of growth for
technology and innovations in the design and use
of concrete. For example, it is particularly pleasing
that the new Highways Agency Policy Interim
Advice Note 60/05 confirms concrete as its material
of choice for motorway and trunk road safety
barriers because whole life costing indicates
superior performance in terms of economy and
safety. Well done to all who were involved in
illustrating one of the many benefits of concrete as
a material. We should, of course, be celebrating
concrete as a fabulous construction material, which
helps to shape both the old world and the new.
The theme of the 2005 Symposium was Concrete
for a New World and speakers who are eminent in
their field gave talks on developments in concrete
technologies both at home and abroad. The
Convention was a resounding success, with a high
attendance and support from those who showed
their wares, to whom thanks are due. Many thanks
are also due to Ian Ferguson and the Events
Committee, with unstinting assistance from
Graham Taylor, both for the Convention and other
technical meetings through the year. Ian’s
additional role of Associate Members’ co-ordinator,
illustrates the time that ICT members of all
categories get involved in making the Institute
work for all members. Our Honorary Treasurer,
John Gibbs, unfortunately had to resign the post
due to re-locating to Kenya, and we wish him well
in his new location, with many thanks to John for
his endeavours and also to Bill Wild for taking the
reins again.
The educational side of the Institute continues
apace, it is pleasing to see that the web-based
course in Advanced Concrete Technology is going
well.
I sometimes perceive a slight change in the
public perception of concrete, which has been
often not good but does seem to be improving,
from both an engineering and an aesthetic
viewpoint. Sustainability of resources is also a
positive point, with the image of grey walls and
despoliation of the countryside being counter-
balanced by pleasing and decorative concrete
finishes and the re-use of a valuable construction
material. We, as an Institute and an industry, need
to maintain our efforts to raise the profile of
concrete; the papers presented at the Symposium
assist in this.
The editorial board under Professor Peter
Hewlett have, once again, produced another
excellent document which I hope you will enjoy.
ROB GAIMSTERPRESIDENTINSTITUTE OF CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
6
INTRODUCTIONThe Institute of Concrete Technology was
formed in 1972. Full membership is open to allthose who have obtained the Diploma inAdvanced Concrete Technology. The Institute isinternationally recognised and the Diploma hasworld-wide acceptance as the leading qualificationin concrete technology. The Institute sets higheducational standards and requires its members toabide by a Code of Professional Conduct, thusenhancing the profession of concrete technology.The Institute is a Professional Affiliate body of theUK Engineering Council.
MEMBERSHIP STRUCTUREA guide on ‘Routes to Membership’ has been
published and contains full details on thequalifications required for entry to each grade ofmembership, which are summarised below:
A FELLOW shall have been a CorporateMember of the Institute for at least 10 years, havea minimum of 15 years appropriate experience,including CPD records from the date ofintroduction, and be at least 40 years old.
A MEMBER (Corporate) shall hold theDiploma in Advanced Concrete Technology andwill have a minimum of 5 years appropriateexperience (including CPD). This will have beendemonstrated in a written ‘Technical andManagerial/Supervisory Experience Report’. Analternative route exists for those not holding theACT Diploma but is deliberately more onerous. A Member shall be at least 25 years old.
AN ASSOCIATE shall hold the City and GuildsCGLI 6290 Certificate in Concrete Technology andConstruction (General Principles and PracticalApplications) and have a minimum of 3 yearsappropriate experience demonstrated in a writtenreport. An appropriate university degree exempts aGraduate member from the requirement to holdCGLI 6290 qualifications. Those who have passedthe written papers of the ACT course but have yetto complete their Diploma may also becomeAssociate members. All candidates for Associatemembership will be invited to nominate acorporate member to act as SuperintendingTechnologist. There is no minimum age limit in thisgrade.
A TECHNICIAN holding the CGLI 5800Certificate in Concrete Practice must also submit awritten report demonstrating 12 monthsexperience in a technician role in the concreteindustry. An alternative route exists for those whocan demonstrate a minimum of 3 yearsappropriate experience in a technician role. Allcandidates for Technician membership will beinvited to nominate a corporate member to act asSuperintending Technologist. There is no minimumage limit in this grade.
A GRADUATE shall hold a relevant universitydegree containing a significant concretetechnology component. All candidates forGraduate membership will be invited to nominatea corporate member to act as SuperintendingTechnologist. There is no minimum age limit in thisgrade.
The STUDENT grade is intended to suit twotypes of applicant.
i) The school leaver working in the concreteindustry working towards the Techniciangrade of membership.
ii) The undergraduate working towards anappropriate university degree containing asignificant concrete technology component.
All candidates for Student membership will beinvited to nominate a corporate member to act asSuperintending Technologist. There is no minimumage limit in this grade. There is a limit of 4 years inthis grade.
Candidates are not obliged to attend anycourse (including the ACT course) prior to sittingan examination at any level.
Academic qualifications and relevant experiencecan be gained in any order for any grade ofmembership.
Corporate members will need to be competentin the science of concrete technology and havesuch commercial, legal and financial awareness asis deemed necessary to discharge their duties inaccordance with the Institute’s Code ofProfessional Conduct.
Continuing Professional Development (CPD) iscommon to most professions to keep theirmembers up to date. All members exceptstudents, are obliged to spend a minimum of 25hours per annum on CPD; approximately 75% ontechnical development and 25% on personaldevelopment. The Institute’s guide on ‘ContinuingProfessional Development’ includes a record sheetfor use by members. This is included in theMembership Handbook. Annual random checksare conducted in addition to inspection at times ofapplication for upgraded membership.
ACT DIPLOMAThe Institute is the examining body for the
Diploma in Advanced Concrete Technology. A residential course is run in South Africa. A newpart-residential/part home-based course isexpected to run in Singapore. The worldwide web-based course is run from the UK, starting inSeptember of alternate years. Further details ofthis course can be found on the website:www.actcourse.com and the ICT office has details of the others.
THE INSTITUTE
7
EXAMINATIONSCOMMITTEE
COUNCILADMISSIONS AND
MEMBERSHIPCOMMITTEE
FINANCECOMMITTEE
MARKETINGCOMMITTEE
EVENTSCOMMITTEE
COUNCIL, OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES - SUMMER 2005
R. RYLEChairman
G. TaylorSecretary
Dr. P.L.J. Domone
R. Gaimster
J. Lay
Dr. J.B. Newman
Dr. R.G.D. Rankine (corresponding)
Dr. R.P. West
J.D. Wootten
W. WILDChairman
C.D. Nessfield
R. Gaimster
A.M. HARTLEYChairman
D.G. King(corresponding)
Dr. B.J. Magee
R.J. Majek
P.L. Mallory
C.D. Nessfield
M.S. Norton
B.F. Perry
G.Taylor
R. GAIMSTERPresident
Dr. B.K. MarshVice President
C.D. NessfieldHon Secretary
W. WildHon Treasurer
M.D. Connell
I.F. Ferguson
A.M. Hartley
P.L. Mallory
R.J. Mangabhai
P.C. Oldham
B.F. Perry
Dr. R.G.D. Rankine (corresponding)
K.C. Sutherland
M.D. CONNELLChairman
G. TaylorSecretary
Dr. W.F. Price
J.D. Wootten
I.F. FERGUSONChairman
G. TaylorSecretary
R.G. Boult
P.M. Latham
P.L. Mallory
P.C. Oldham
B.C. Patel
G. Prior(corresponding)
SCOTTISH CLUBCOMMITTEE
R.C. BROWNChairman
G. PriorSecretary
L.R. BakerTreasurer
J.G. Bell
K.W. Head
B.J. O’Shea
J. Wilson
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
G. TAYLOR
TECHNICAL ANDEDUCATIONCOMMITTEE
Dr. B.K. MARSHChairman
J.V. TaylorSecretary
L.K. Abbey
R.A. Binns
M.W. Burton
Dr. A.J. Dowson
R.J. Greenfield
R. Hutton
J. Lay
C.B. Richards
A.T. Wilson
8
9
Q: I suppose that the obvious firstquestion is to ask what first stimulated yourinterest in concrete?
A: My Mother maintains that "concrete" wasthe second word I uttered (after "motorbike”,that was). In truth, I initially developed aninterest in construction through helping my fatherwho was a builder, and despite his advice not togo “on the buildings” I started to study civilengineering. The growing interest in concrete wasa gradual process during my days as a civilengineering undergraduate that took me awayfrom my planned career in contracting and intoconcrete research. The first sparks were struck inconcrete technology lectures and lab classes, myinterest then smouldered through a final yearproject and burst into flames when I took a 12month research contract in concrete technologyfollowing graduation.
Q: You spent many years as head ofConcrete Technology at BRE before moving toyour present position with Arup. What wouldyou describe as your most fulfillingachievements during this period?
A: A very tricky question. Odd as it mayseem, and although it was a highly enjoyable andrewarding time in my career, nothing really standsout above the rest. A predictable answer, I know,but honest!
I was more of a generalist than a specialist, sothat I never got involved in many of the ‘glamour’projects being carried out at BRE, such as work onASR and sulfates (or should that be sulphates?)my work was more in a supporting role than‘centre stage’.
Q: When you moved from BRE to Arup,what were the main differences in the typeof work you were undertaking?
A: Probably the biggest difference was that Iwas now facing questions that were being askedbecause an Arup engineer needed to know theanswer rather than because it would be good toknow the answer or "to further knowledge", aswas more the case at BRE. Deadlines tend to bea lot shorter, answers need to be more definite(no longer can the largest section of a report bethe self-perpetuating "need for further research")but much more varied. One project that standsout was an urgent request to sort out potentialproblems with ASR on a job in Siberia whereconstruction had already started. Indeed, I thinkit's fair to say that since I joined Arup I've usedjust about every part of the ACT syllabus - andsome bits that aren't yet included (such as ice-abrasion).
Q: There is a widespread perception thatthe level of technical expertise in theconcrete industry is falling; do you have anyviews on this?
A: Personally, I find it difficult to find a datumagainst which to make a valid comparison. I havebeen fortunate to work alongside some peoplewith very high levels of technical expertise but Ialso deal with people who I feel "really shouldknow better". The technical specialists do nowseem to be concentrated in a few companiesrather than spread throughout the industry. Ofcourse, there are still a lot of very good peopleout there but whether there are enough - I don'tknow.
Q: On a related topic, how does the useof concrete in the UK, and the application ofnew technology, differ from that in othercountries?
A: I really don’t have enough overseasexperience to make an informed comment, except
FACE TO FACEWITH INCOMING PRESIDENT BRYAN MARSH
Incoming ICT President Dr. Bryan Marsh is a member ofthe materials advisory team within Arup MaterialsConsulting, which provides advice to all parts of the OveArup Partnership and external clients, worldwide, on theuse of materials in construction processes. He dealsparticularly with concrete technology and materials. He isalso involved with UK and European standards forconcrete, particularly with respect to durability. Prior tojoining Arup, he was Head of the Concrete TechnologySection at the Building Research Establishment for overten years.
10
to note that the approach to the adoption of newideas varies in different countries. It’s too easy totrot out that old line that British engineers arevery conservative and I don’t wish to fall into thattrap.
Q: What do you think the most significantnew developments in concrete technologyhave been in the last 5-10 years and whatfuture developments do you anticipate?
A: Gosh, these questions are difficult! For amaterial that's been around, in some form orother, since ancient times, it never ceases toamaze me that we keep coming up with newthings at all. I think new developments will begradual advances rather than major revolutions.Admixture development continues to impress meand I hope it may long continue. Thedevelopment of self-compacting concrete and therecent introduction of shrinkage reducingadmixtures are testament to this process.Developments I would like to see would be thosethat improve sustainability by allowing the use ofalternative aggregates and less environmentallydamaging cements, possibly also with a moreattractive colour! Concrete that retains itsworkability, gains strength instantly when inplace, gives off no heat, doesn't shrink and hasuniform appearance would do for a start. Inert tocarbon dioxide, sulfates and acids, impervious tochlorides, unaffected by frost and totallyrecyclable would do for a follow up. As a songsays “it’s too much to expect but it’s not toomuch to ask!”.
Q: : Given that concrete is probably themost widely used construction material onearth, do you think that it is studied insufficient depth by students of engineeringand do you feel that there is a need forspecific qualifications in concrete technologyand its application?
A: Not only is concrete the most widely usedconstruction material, I read recently that it's thesecond most used material after water - though Iwould have thought "earth" would have come inthere somewhere...
No, I don’t think it is given enough time inmost undergraduate engineering courses and,yes, I think there is a need for specificqualifications in concrete technology butrecognising that this will always be a nichemarket, so to speak. Everyone involved inconcrete needs to know something of the basicsbut we don’t all need to be concretetechnologists. Concrete technologists can,
however, bring it all together and all goodspecialist firms should have one (or more).
Q: You are heavily involved in thedevelopment of new standards for concreteand concrete construction as well as theimplementation of these new standards(both British and European) in practice. Whatis your view on recent developments instandardisation?
A: When concrete was sand, gravel, OPC andwater (dirt, burnt dirt and water as some of mynon-concrete colleagues would have it) standardscould be, and were, fairly simple. Increasingstrength improved just about everything else – sowhen the going got tough, the grade simply gotupped. But times have changed, concrete needsto be much more closely tailored to the job it isbeing asked to do. And, of course, we have hadsome failures in the past so we need standardsthat will help protect us from such things in thefuture. It is the interfaces that need to be keptsimple and perhaps we are failing somewhat inthat area. By interfaces I mean the places wheredesign meets specification and wherespecification meets supply. Suppliers understandconcrete intimately as regards materials,production and economics - most designers don’t.But they know what properties they require of theconcrete whereas the suppliers might not. Weneed our standards to be based on a reasonablelevel of understanding on the part of each personin the chain.
Despite some involvement in the creation of EN206-1 and BS 8500, I still feel that theintroduction of these new standards almostcoincidentally with BRE Special Digest 1 suddenlymade life very complicated, at least for a while.Concrete specification by EN 206-1 is simple inprinciple but, unfortunately, based on a systemthat didn’t readily translate to the way, in the UK,we trade between cover to reinforcement andconcrete quality. New standards obviously have tobe technically justified, but they also need to bereadily understandable by the people who usethem, not just by standards writers. Betterguidance for practitioners would be valuable andcertainly reduce the degree of uncertainty in somequarters about what the standard actually means.
Q: : What inspired you to join the ICT(and have you ever regretted it)?
A: On joining BRE after an academic researchbackground I convinced them to let me sign upfor the ACT course to broaden my knowledge; atthat stage I must admit I’d never heard of the ICT.
11
On getting the diploma I joined the ICT toestablish my identity as a concrete technologistand not just as a civil engineer. Perhaps the onlytime I have regretted it (or might yet) was beingtalked into standing for President!
Q: As the incoming President of the ICT,how can you help to strengthen the ICT‘brand image’ in a period of continuingchange in the concrete industry and how doyou see the future for the ICT?
A: Our last two presidents, in particular, havedone a marvellous job in strengthening ICT, itsimage and what it offers to members. I'm strictlya technical chap, not a "marketeer" or a “leaderof men”, so I aim to concentrate on maintainingtechnical excellence. I would like to see ICT attaina raised awareness within the industry as thebody representing the professional practitioners ofa technically-based discipline. I believe we canonly do that by demonstrating that MICT andFICT mean we really know what we’re talkingabout. I would also like all our AMICT memberswho really know what they’re talking about(hopefully most of them) to demonstrate that bymoving up to MICT.
Our future is perhaps a little uncertain. Wehave been losing members faster than we havebeen gaining them and currently over 40% of ourmembers are associates. That is not healthy. Thebalance between corporate and associatemembers needs to change. I would like to thinkthat the ultimate objective of all associates wouldbe to eventually gain full corporate membershipstatus. If we continue the way we are, we riskbecoming a club instead of a professional body.
Q: I do not think we can conclude thisinterview without at least a passingreference to your well-known interest inmotorcycling. I believe you have eventravelled to New Zealand in search of theultimate biking experience. What is it aboutmotorcycling that has inspired such passionfor this form of transport?
A: Passion for motorcycles? What? Me?Although I suppose a stable of five Triumphsdating from 1913 to 2000, and having riddenover 400,000 miles in about 20 countries couldbe interpreted that way. I won’t claim it’s thewind in my hair and flies in my teeth type ofexperience, or the adrenalin rush of outrageousspeed (certainly not on my 1913 or 1930 bikesanyway!), or being at one – man & machine. Ialways say it’s a passing phase – but it’s been 32years and hasn’t passed yet!
Bryan, many thanks for sharing your thoughtswith us. I found our conversation interesting andinformative. I certainly wish you well in yourPresidency and in your ongoing career. Manythanks.
12
13
IntroductionThe precast concrete producers are arguably
approaching a golden age of tertiary development
built on a combination of improving materials
technology, new generations of production and
handling equipment, added value product
options, excellent sustainability credentials and
coincident market requirements. It is an exciting
time to be in the industry with change and
improvement the watchwords. The sector
accounts for about 28% of cement used in the
UK but with better control of cement content
these days it accounts for around a third of
concrete produced by volume. The overall
turnover of the sector is now over £2 billion with
around 850 factories of all sizes. Four million
tonnes of cementitious products are consumed
annually along with over 35 million tonnes of
aggregates. Precast has indeed become a
significant part of the overall construction market
in the UK, as well as across the globe. Used to
solve practical engineering problems, improve
construction programme times, reduce costs,
improve safety or enhance the appearance of a
building or structure, precast concrete is now
thoroughly integrated into the construction
process.
At its simplest precast concrete is any
manufactured concrete element or structure, large
or small, that is cast in one place and used in
another. Sizes start with paving blocks of around
0.0004 m2, progress through the common precast
products seen on building sites everywhere, past
civil engineering structures such as bridge
sections, right up to the massive storage and
ballast sections of oil extraction platforms. These
can contain over 200,000 m3 of concrete, and
may have to travel many hundreds of miles from
the manufacturing site to the point of use. This
makes the precast concrete production range
cover around 10 orders of magnitude in size, a
truly awesome variation in scale.
Precast concrete has provided some of the
most ingenious developments in manufacturing
and construction, and this history highlights some
of the more unusual parts that it has played.
Early production of precastconcrete
History is vague about precisely where the
earliest recorded examples of precast concrete can
be found; to discover items of precast concrete in
forms that we would recognise, we have to look
at around the time of the development of
Portland Cement. When Joseph Aspdin came to
patent his ‘Portland’ Cement in 1824, he had
already seen concrete manufactured from earlier,
poorer quality cements. Statues made from
various types of ‘cement’ and aggregates were
starting to appear, ranging from Williams
Champion’s ‘Neptune’ in about 1750 to Aspdin’s
own son James’ commission in around 1850 of
‘The Prophet Samuel in Infancy’. Whilst there is
some debate regarding the exact movement of
these statutes, some of these early works were
moved from casting to their site of erection, and
can therefore be regarded as ‘precast’.
As engineers and builders grew to appreciate
the potential for repetition in manufacture with
Portland cement, the 1850s started to see sales of
A LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF PRECAST CONCRETE.By Martin Clarke, Chief Executive, British Precast
The technology of cement based materials has been developing since the firstconcrete mix was produced. Much of this technology was further improved withtime but much was forgotten (sometimes to be later ‘reinvented’). Somedevelopments have been accidental, such as the discovery of the benefits of airentrainment, some have been the result of foresight and endeavour, or commercialgain, whilst others have been born of necessity such as those for military andstructural reasons.
This series of articles - "Milestones in the history of concrete technology" - hasincluded diverse papers on advances in concrete technology for military and sportingconstruction, and different cement types. Given the increasing emphasis on off-siteconstruction, the paper below is particularly timely.
MILESTONES IN THE HISTORY OF CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
14
concrete products, mostly in the way of floor
beams and large building blocks, and a range of
ornate garden landscape products. There was
particular interest recently when Castle House in
Bridgwater was nominated for the BBC
Restoration award. The “Concrete Castle” was
built as a showhouse for Board & Co in 1851
featuring their concrete product ranges both
functional and decorative, a forerunner of this
year’s Hanson House at Offsite2005.
Other examples of precasting using ‘Roman’
cement (previously patented in 1796, and named
from the belief that the secrets of the cement that
the Romans had used had been duplicated to
create it) includes the first all-concrete house, in
which a number of elements were precast – not
least of which were the concrete gnomes placed
in the gardens. Built for John Bazley White, who
was a manufacturer of Roman cement from the
Swanscombe area in Kent, it was completed in
1835, although precisely how much of the all-
concrete structure was precast is not known.
Another concrete house built in Gravesend in
1850 by William Aspdin to demonstrate the uses
of Portland cement featured ornate precast
elements that formed a garden balustrade (see
Figure 1), which can still be seen today.
By 1848, even accidental production of precast
concrete was put to good use. Joseph Aspdin’s
elder son, William, had set up a cement works in
Northfleet, and was shipping barrels of cement
far and wide. A ship loaded with cement barrels
from his works sailed down the River Thames and
ran aground at Sheerness. The locals are
rumoured to have leapt to the aid of the stricken
ship, rescuing the barrels in the mistaken belief
that they contained brandy. By the time the
barrels had been recovered and opened, the
contents had set, and the townsfolk had to
decide what to do with them. With their original
intentions in mind, no doubt, they elected to
build a public house from them! The ‘Ship on
Shore’, or ‘Grotto’ as it was sometimes known,
was the result, with the original barrels still clearly
on display in the remaining sections.
Mass productionAround the 1850s, real examples of precast
manufacturing start to appear with the formation
of Adolph Kroher’s ‘Staudacher-Cementfabrik’
concrete tile manufacturing business in Southern
Bavaria by 1858 [1]. Examples of tiles made by
Kroher before forming his manufacturing
company date back at least to 1848,
manufactured from locally occurring naturally
cementitious materials.
Kroher’s early tiles were predominantly
diamond-shaped, a property which they shared
with Roman stone slates used in Britain some
1500 years before. He soon designed wooden
‘forme’ to make concrete pantiles and ridgetiles,
as well as flat, interlocked tiles. Kroher also made
a device to form his tiles that allowed one person
to make between 120 and 160 tiles a day, all
perfectly shaped. Without knowing it, Kroher had
invented the modern concrete tile manufacturing
business.
As Portland cement became readily available,
reliable and of sufficient quality, precasters started
to benefit from the improved performance that
the use of factory controlled conditions could
provide, although very few recognised the full
benefits at the time. With the Victorian passion
for engineering and technological innovation,
many advances in production techniques came
about. Perhaps one of the least known of its time
was the Fielding and Platt hydraulic press; the first
hydraulic press in the UK, and possibly the world,
which was was manufactured in 1890. Powered
by water to rotate its sophisticated triple mould
rotating table, the press developed 500 tons of
force translated into 2 tons per square inch of
product-pressing mechanism. The second press
was manufactured three months later. It was
transferred to the Adamant Stone and Paving
Company of Aberdeen in 1897, where it then
continued production for a further 73 years
before its retirement – a truly magnificent
performance.
From 1904 to 1907 a precast facility was set
up at Calstock on the banks of the Tamar by local
contractor John Lang. The aim was a new railway
viaduct to connect the industrial and agricultural
riches of the area with the main rail network at
Plymouth. The magnificent result continues to
carry rail traffic across the river every hour. TheFigure 1: Precast elements in WilliamAspdin’s garden balustrade.
quality of the large precast blocks, which
controversially replaced the usual granite on cost
grounds, was and is superb and rightly Calstock
Viaduct won a Concrete Society Mature Structure
award in 2004. (see Figure 2)
As the twentieth century eased its way through
political turmoil and the First World War, the
manufacture of precast concrete became well
established. The benefits of controlled
manufacturing conditions, mechanisation, regular
skilled labour and the sourcing of raw materials of
consistent quality meant that precast concrete
was being made to the highest standards possible
at the time.
Roofing tiles from the 1930s can be seen in
Figure 3, on top of an all-concrete house. Figure
4 shows coloured precast concrete for the Carrera
Building in Mornington Crescent, London;
yellows, reds, greens, browns and blacks all
featured. The production of polished precast
Figure 2: Calstock Viaduct
Figure 3: ‘Defiance’ roofing tiles. Figure 4: The Carrera Building in London
15
partition panes shown in Figure 5 were cast in the
1920s with marble aggregate. Figure 6 shows a
precast London police box of 1930 and
pipemaking at Mono Concrete’s plant around that
time is shown in Figure 7. At this time,
manufacturers were getting organised and the era
of the ‘Product Association’ was arriving.
Early trade associations Although British Precast (formally the British
Precast Concrete Federation) can trace its history
back to 1918, there are signs that the American
industry was well ahead in terms of being an
organised ‘body’. In 1926, the distinguished
Brigadier-General A.C. Critchley, C.M.G., D.S.O.,
and Vice President of the British Portland Cement
Association, wrote with passion to
the Editor of Concrete for the
Builder & Concrete Products[2],
asking for support for ‘a body
similar to the Concrete Products
Association of America’. Citing the
improvements to product quality
and the dissemination of
knowledge amongst its members,
it is doubtful that the message hit
home until the next sentence;
‘official figures show that last year
alone no fewer than 500,000,000
concrete articles of all descriptions
were made and sold in that country’. The Editor
not only printed the request, but also dedicated
his entire editorial page to supporting the plea,
and to wishing the Association all success.
From skyscrapers to ships Whilst the Americans stole a march on trade
associations, the British had already tried what
would later become an American trademark – the
skyscraper. In 1879, Andrew Peterson started
work on building a folly in form of the 66 m tall
Sway Tower in Hampshire. On completion, in
1885, it was the tallest concrete building in the
world and was built with precast concrete steps,
cornices and window mouldings, although the
main structure was in situ concrete. It showed
remarkable foresight and engineering faith in
both in situ and precast materials.
The first world war also brought about a
shortage of steel and the shipbuilders of Britain
turned to concrete. In 1919[3], the SS Armistice,
the first self-propelled concrete ship to be built in
Britain, was launched; another example of the
Figure 5: Partition panels
Figure 6: Precast London police box Figure 7: Pipemaking in the 1930s
16
extremes to which the use of precasting was
starting to be considered. Many canal and sea-
going barges were also constructed all over
Britain during the First World War, some of which
are still afloat. Again, however, the British lagged
behind the Americans who, although not as short
of steel as Britain, had already launched the SS
Palo Alto on 19 May 1918. At 434 feet and 6,144
tons, the Palo Alto carried 1.3 millions gallons of
oil, on top of a steam engine for propulsion. The
vessel remained in service until the depression and
in 1930 was deliberately sunk at the end of a pier
in Seacliff, California, USA, for use as an
amusement centre, and to protect the pier from
the worst of the weather. She remains there to
this day, and despite cracking her hull during the
first year of resting on the seabed, is largely still
intact.
Civil and wartime usesIn the 1920s the British precast industry really
started to develop, alongside the development of
steel reinforcement. Pipes, culverts and storage
tanks were to the fore, the manufacture of
concrete roof tiles was adopted from Germany,
and the building block was introduced for mass
housing. The Second World War also saw the first
production of railway sleepers, although full-scale
production only really got going after the war had
ended.
Wartime seemed to encourage the
adventurous side of precasting, from the
ambitious plan in 1918 to float 16 concrete
towers out into the English channel for German
submarine interception (two were built before the
war came to an end), to the innovative Mulberry
harbour pontoons, each 61 metres long and 18
metres wide and deep. A total of 200 of these
huge structures were floated across the English
Channel in one night, to form the
harbour wall and play a vital role in
the D-Day landings.
Technical and aestheticdevelopments
In it’s infancy by WWII, prestressing
was just starting to become
established as a viable technique, and
during the early part of the war a
number of prestressed concrete
bridge beams were manufactured and
stored for emergency use. Several
bridges were built from these beams
but, for security reasons, the exact
locations were not released.
As precast concrete technology developed, so
did the functional processes that work around it
in manufacturing, production control and design.
Today, modern automated systems control
increasingly sophisticated factory systems; in fact
the most advanced hollowcore flooring factory in
the world has been opened by Bison at
Swadlincote, Derbyshire in 2005.
Precast concrete has been tooled, textured and
stained for aesthetic purposes; coloured and
textured concretes allowed architects to express
themselves more freely and to help develop the
potential of what, during the 1960s, became a
material that was hated in some quarters for its
bland, grey appearance.
Block paving – 30 years ofdevelopment
During the 1970s, concrete block paving was
introduced into the UK; a delayed introduction of
a well-established product from Europe. The
industry has never looked back. Modern block
paving can be found in a wide variety of colours,
textures, shapes and laying patterns. It can be
designed to take the heaviest of industrial loads,
or provide the lightest touch to a domestic
installation. It can also be adapted to absorb
traffic fumes, or as permeable paving to provide
sustainable drainage through the surface to the
underlying strata. In addition the paving surface is
repairable and the elements are recyclable. Made
with decorative, recycled or artificial aggregates,
and a range of cementitious and colour
combinations, block paving typifies the way that
precast concrete has been able to develop in the
past century and a half.
Two modern examples of precast concrete are
shown in Figures 8 and 9.
Figure 8: H&H Celcon Aircrete production
17
18
The futureWith innovation, technological advances and
an eye for opportunity, the precast industry
continues to progress worldwide. Modern
manufacturing in the UK needs to take account of
health, safety and environmental issues, together
with the many layers of legislation both from the
UK and Europe, which affect both working
practices and business methods. Additionally,
modern precast manufacturers have to get along
with all their stakeholders, from shareholders to
the next-door neighbour, from the workforce to
the local environment. British Precast reflects
these new challenges in its Best Practice Awards
schemes (see www.britishprecast.org/awards.) The
entries for these awards clearly track how the
industry is moving forward. Productivity is being
boosted by the strides in equipment design and
outputs, materials technology is improving quality
and consistency, robotics are making the
workplace safer, tagging is improving customer
service and inventory control efficiency and the
potential for integrated 4D design detailing and
production programmes is massive. A similar
retrospective in 20 years time will undoubtedly
record a time of much progress and improvement.
References
1 Charles Dobson. The History of theConcrete Roofing Tile’ B.T. Batsford Ltd,1959.
2 Concrete for the Builder & ConcreteProducts Yearbook 1926-1927, ConcretePublications Ltd, 1927.
3 Concrete Through the Ages, British CementAssociation, 1999.
Figure 9: Arsenal Football Club’s new stadium under construction
19
ANNUAL CONVENTION SYMPOSIUM: PAPERS PRESENTED 2005
PAPERS: AUTHORS:
A major part of the ICT Annual Convention is the Technical Symposium, where guestspeakers who are eminent in their field present papers on their specialist subjects.Each year papers are linked by a theme. The title of the 2005 Symposium was:
CONCRETE FOR A NEW WORLD Symposium Chairman: Ian Cox, BSc, MSc, CEng, FIStructE, MICE, MIHT, MInstSMM, FCIM. The Concrete Centre
Edited versions of the papers are given in the following pages. Some papers vary in writtenstyle notwithstanding limited editing.
KEYNOTE ADDRESS Dr. John MilesMEETING THE CHALLENGES FREng, CEng, FIMechE, BSc(Hons), PhDOF THE NEW WORLD Arup Group
THAMESLINK 2000 CTRL Jasen GauldENABLING WORKS MICT
CEMEX - RMC Materials Ltd
THE TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE OF STEEL Ann Lambrechts AND POLYMER-BASED FIBRE CONCRETE MSCE
nv Bekaert sa., Belgium
MARINE CONCRETE EXPERIENCE IN THE Peter de VriesNETHERLANDS - WHAT HAS BEEN LEARNED? FICT
ENCI B.V., HeidelbergcementgroupNetherlands
THE ROLE OF PRECAST CONCRETE Peter Kelly IN STADIA BSc, CEng, MIStructE
and Nick Webb Bison Concrete Ltd
RECENT ADVANCES IN THE UNDERSTANDING Larry RobertsOF CEMENT/ADMIXTURE INTERACTIONS BSc, MSc
W R Grace & Co., USA
THE GREAT MAN-MADE RIVER PROJECT, LIBYA Andy RogersMICTPrice Brothers (UK) Ltd
DUCTAL®: ULTRA-HIGH PERFORMANCE Dr. Mouloud BehloulCONCRETE TECHNOLOGY FOR A WIDE RANGE Lafarge Group, FranceOF APPLICATIONS
ADVANCED CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY FOR A Dr. Mario CorradiCOMPLEX BRIDGE SYSTEM WITH LOW Degussa Construction ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Chemicals Europe, Italy
HIGH-PERFORMANCE MICROSILICA CONCRETE Kshemendra NathFOR THE BANDRA-WORLI SEA-LINK, MUMBAI BTech, MICT
Elkem India Private Ltd
20
21
Dr John Miles is a Member of
the Arup Group Board and has
been Chairman of their Global
Consulting Sector since April
2004, following spells as
Chairman of the firm’s Business
Investment Executive and Chairman of the firm’s
Corporate Services Division. The Consulting
Business offers clients a service that is
complementary to Arup’s more conventional lines
of business, thus ensuring that the firm remains
unique in its ability to perceive need; create
solutions and deliver results.
John Miles had previously accumulated 20
years of professional experience in the area of
design for high performance structures. This
included mechanical and civil engineering
structural design for buildings, and the
structural/mechanical design of road vehicles and
rail systems under extreme loadings such as crash,
blast, impact and seismic shock. Subsequently,
his experience developed into the areas of design
for manufacture and, in particular, off-site
fabrication for the housing sector.
He is a fellow of the Royal Academy of
Engineering and has served terms as a
commissioner for CABE (Commission for
Architecture in the Built Environment) and a
Director of the UK Housing Forum. He is author
of numerous technical and business publications
and he is a Visiting Professor of Design Principles
at Warwick University.
ABSTRACTThis paper examines the market share, both
current and potential, for concrete. It illustrates,
using a case study, the feasibility of building
houses with factory produced systems and lists
the reasons, including sustainability, why this
should be so. In the current scene, the
government’s aim to increase the housing stock
by using Modern Methods of Construction is
outlined and the requirement to change the
approach to design, construction and delivery is
noted.
KEYWORDSSustainability, Environment, Business
challenges, Factory-produced, Housing, Added
value, Whole building delivery, Modern Methods
of Construction (MMC).
MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF THE NEW WORLD
Dr. John Miles FREng, CEng, FIMechE, BSc(Hons), PhD
Arup Group
Figure 1: Cementitious Product v New Construction Output
22
INTRODUCTIONConcrete is a marvellous material. It is cheap
and plentiful. It is robust and well understood. It
is easily formed into complex shapes. It can be
used to create buildings which are almost
unlimited in their form and, with care, it can be
pushed to some extraordinary extremes.
Concrete coil springs and canopies as thin as
fabric membranes come to mind.
Yet, with all these successes and track-record,
the place of concrete in a strong UK construction
market is under threat. As a fraction of total
construction output, cementitious product market
share is declining (Figure 1). On top of this,
environmentalists and the sustainability lobby are
raising ever stronger voices resisting the
despoilment of the countryside and the depletion
of natural resources that accompany aggregate
extraction. And the same voices are raised
against the high levels of energy consumption
associated with the production of cement.
Against a backdrop of reducing market share
and increasing environmental opposition, where
does the concrete industry go from here?
This question is not so much a question of
technology, it is more a question of business
requirement. In order to answer the question,
the concrete fraternity needs a root-and-branch
evaluation of the business challenges facing the
developers and constructors who procure and
deliver completed buildings. From this must be
constructed a re-statement of the competitive
advantages of concrete in distinct and business-
like terms.
A CASE STUDYAn example of this sort of root-and-branch
business thinking can be found in the
housebuilding industry. The issue, from a
business perspective, is to build better quality
housing in the UK at lower costs than current
practices can deliver. An examination of
conventional processes sets the targets for build
price and finished quality. Build cost, it turns out,
is very low (much lower than the norm for
commercial construction); build quality is patchy
(at best). Meeting the second target wil be easier
than meeting the first!
An independent study[1] concluded that
concrete would be an ideal material on which to
base the development of an advanced, factory-
based, production system for modern housing in
Britain. A factory, with low capital intensity of
equipment, was designed. Practical trials and
tests were conducted to demonstrate the
technical performance of concrete within this
application environment. And a prototype house
was built to demonstrate that conventional
appearances could be delivered from factory-
based systems (Figure 2). (This is an important
customer-satisfaction issue).
Concrete was chosen as the base-material for
the product for a variety of very simple reasons:
• It is a low-cost, robust, material that needs
minimal maintenance
• Its characteristics and behaviour are well
understood
• It can be used for low, medium and high-rise
configurations with minimal adaptation
• It has excellent fire-resistance
• It can be produced with a very high surface
quality, (thus removing the cost of plastering)
• It has good sustainability characteristics.
The last point deserves some elaboration, since
current opinion often raises questions in this area.
There are clear disadvantages from a sustainability
point-of-view in terms of embodied energy
(cement) and despoilment/resource deprivation
(aggregate). There are, however, some positive
aspects which can outweigh these headline
disadvantages:
• Embodied Energy is not significantly worse
than competitor products (brick and block;
steel; etc)
Figure 2: Concrete-based ‘Meteor System’ developed for UK Housing Market
23
• Embodied CO2 likewise
• High mass gives good acoustic insulation
• High mass, when combined with good
insulation, gives good thermal and energy-
in-use characteristics
• Robust material has good ‘wear’
characteristics and therefore low
maintenance cost (for social housing)
• Near-net-shape material has minimal
wastage during production.
These excellent baseline characteristics,
however, are not enough on their own. The key
to the business case for this product was to
maximise the ‘value added’ in the factory
environment, and minimise the labour hours
required to complete the house on site. By doing
this, the capital value of the factory could be
amortised more effectively and the error-prone,
site-based, processes of plumbing, cabling and
finishing be fundamentally changed for the
better. As a consequence, quality could be
improved and costs reduced simultaneously.
This coupling of economic advantage and
improved product performance neatly illustrates
the concept of ‘Whole Building Delivery’.
Essential to this idea is an appreciation that the
cost of the structure is only one element in the
total cost of delivering a house. Indeed, the
combined cost of the services, fittings and
finishes far exceeds the cost of the ‘brick and
block’. These value-adding items must be dealt
with in the factory if concrete-based off-site
systems are to become cost-effective when
compared to conventional processes.
THE CURRENT SCENEAt the time of writing, the Government
continues to promote its desire for the
Construction Industry (and particularly the
housebuilding sector) to change its traditional
approach and embrace Modern Methods of
Construction (MMC). In the face of a clear need
to increase the rate of housebuilding at a national
level, MMC is seen as a panacea for the need to
build better houses faster at no extra cost (or,
indeed, at even lower cost). How can the
concrete fraternity respond to this pressure?
Unfortunately, at present, there is no precise
definition of MMC. However, recognising that
the impetus for this new approach stems directly
from a desire to build more product with less
available skilled labour on site, the key issue
could be interpreted as a requirement to increase
the productivity of those remaining site-based
operatives. From this, a working definition of
MMC might be proposed which goes along the
following lines:
“Modern Methods of Construction are those
which reduce significantly the labour hours
required on site to complete any building when
compared to the current industry norm. Such
methods must also be inherently sustainable and
must produce buildings of high quality”.
If a definition along these lines becomes
adopted, what response will be offered? Will we
see a return to the ‘70s style of precast concrete
panel systems for housing (Figure 3) or will the
industry offer more than that?
Observation of previous cycles of off-site
manufacture lead to the conclusion that none of
them created lasting change in the industry. The
prefabs of the late ‘40s and the precast systems
of the ‘70s fell into disuse once the hand of
government was removed. The reason for this
was very simple: those factory-based systems
were more costly (not less costly) than
conventional methods of construction. Thus,
when left to free-market forces, the new systems
died and conventional methods
returned to domination.
If the current round of enthusiasm for
MMC is to endow lasting change, the
economic equation must be squared.
Modern Methods must not only
produce better houses; they must
produce more cost effective houses.
This can only be achieved by
considering the delivery of the whole
building from the outset, rather than
considering it as a collection of isolated
components which are brought
together on site. And this argument
extends beyond housebuilding to theFigure 3: Will we see a return to 70s’ style panelsystems?
24
wider horizons of the construction industry at
large. In short, the industry’s response to the
Government’s challenge of MMC must be to
produce new products that address ‘Whole
Building Delivery’ not ‘Part Building Delivery’.
This requires a sea-change of approach.
CONCLUSIONSConcrete is an ideal material from which to
develop new construction systems that will meet
the Government’s demand for MMC. However,
these systems are more likely to be successful if
they are based on the concept of ‘Whole Building
Delivery’ than if they are simple extensions of
low-value, structural component type products.
‘Whole Building Delivery’ recognises that the
majority of ‘value’ in any building lies in the
services, fittings and finishes which are integral to
the finished product. Successful Modern
Methods of Construction must therefore
integrate the installation of these value-adding
components with the production of the basic
(concrete) structure.
To do this successfully requires a radically
different approach to design, construction, and
delivery. Holistic design must be employed which
recognises, from the outset, the integrated
requirements of structure, services, fittings, and
finishes. And multi-skilled production techniques
must be deployed in the production environment
which enable these elements to be installed
simultaneously and without error. Quite likely
(but not necessarily) such production facilities will
be off-site.
For this scenario to become a reality, a massive
challenge is presented in the areas of education
and training. The next generation of designers,
fabricators and constructors must have an innate
appreciation of Whole Building Delivery (or
‘Embodied Value’). With its emphasis on
qualifications and accreditation, this is a particular
challenge for the ICT.
How, exactly, will the ICT respond?
REFERENCE1. Opportunity of a Lifetime - Ingenia :
Issue 17, Oct/Nov 2003
2525
Jasen Gauld is the London Area
Technical Manager for CEMEX
UK Operations, formerly
known as RMC Materials
Limited. He joined RMC in the
close of 1988 and was
assigned a managerial role in London in 1996. In
his role the need to investigate and assess new
materials and processes is vital to remaining
dynamic to the challenges and opportunities of
the London business.
ABSTRACTThe customer base seeks concrete solutions to
meet given applications. This paper considers an
exclusive project from the perspective of the
concrete supplier and illustrates that concrete
solutions continue to have their rightful place
within our industry. Furthermore, it illustrates the
importance of a meaningful resource within the
structure of the concrete supplier to deliver and
secure completion with specialised concreting
materials. Survival within our sector is not based
upon volume alone, but requires the ability to
redefine the properties of our product to an
acceptable order of confidence. Such demands
can be met and secure concrete’s central place as
a malleable heavy building material.
KEYWORDSConcrete solution, Equivalent flexural strength,
Customer, Validation process, Constructability.
INTRODUCTIONHigh velocity trains enter the United Kingdom
from the continent through the Channel Tunnel
and currently arrive at Waterloo Station, London.
To maximise the benefits of high-speed travel,
extensive programmes to develop existing
facilities and install new track are ongoing,
together with an ever-developing vision of
outsourcing such facilities beyond Waterloo
Station. A review of the existing facility at
Clerkenwell Tunnels 2 and 3 (i.e. local to Kings
Cross Station) required that the existing track slab
be upgraded, without raising the height of the
track slab or undermining the existing
foundation. The existing track slab was
instrumental to the integrity of the foundation.
A novel thin concrete overlay was required to
meet the requirements of the specification. The
suitability of this innovative product would have a
significant bearing on the project’s success or
failure.
The main contractor was Balfour Beatty Rail
Projects and at the time the concrete supplier was
RMC South East.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECTThe project required the application of
experience and concrete technology in the
preparation of an innovative concreting material.
The purpose of the material was to enable the
client to run trains on time once the blockade
window had closed and to upgrade the existing
facility in readiness for the forthcoming high
velocity trains from the continent.
The main works took place from late
December 2003 to early January 2004 during the
blockade of the Clerkenwell Tunnels 2 and 3.
The planned placement of the new material was
to take place during the period 28th to 30th
December 2003.
The tunnel blockade allowed for removal of
the existing track and the removal / trimming of
the existing concrete surface, prior to placing a
new concrete overlay to the existing slab. The
new concrete was anchored to the existing slab
by galvanised steel shear studs and was
reinforced with steel mesh and steel fibres.
The new material was delivered to the point of
placement by pump over a linear pipeline
distance greater than 100 metres. The material
would be placed in both tunnels simultaneously
and would require an adequate supply of
concrete to service both pumps.
From an early age a large volume of the new
material would face vigorous demands in situ and
be laid to a thickness as low as 80 millimetres.
Initial in situ performance was required to allow
the uninterrupted passage of the equipment for
construction of the track. At 7 days a greater
THAMESLINK 2000 CTRL ENABLING WORKS
Jasen Gauld MICT
CEMEX - RMC Materials Ltd
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and not neccessarily those ofCEMEX UK Operations and/or RMC Materials Ltd.
2626
performance was required to allow for the
passage of trains through the tunnel and at 28
days an even greater performance to meet the
durability design criteria.
PRIMARY REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATION
The structural performance level as derived
from BS 8500 Table A.3 was ‘high’ requiring the
material to fulfil a long service life solution in
excess of 100 years.
The in situ concrete was to achieve
compressive strength values (as determined from
150 mm concrete test cubes) of 6.0 N/mm2 at 24
hours, 40.0 N/mm2 at 7 days and 50.0 N/mm2 at
28 days. These values are further complimented
with an in situ equivalent flexural strength
(fctm,eq300) requirement (as determined from
150 mm x 150 mm x 500 mm concrete test
beams) of 4.5 N/mm2 to JSCE SF4. Inevitably this
would mean that all test samples were cured
adjacent to the slab.
The material was to be pumped without
segregation or blockage at a rate suitable for the
construction process from the point of delivery to
the placement location.
The concrete supplier proposed both the
required workability / consistence and the
method by which to measure it. The consistence
of the concrete had to be such that the concrete
was suitable for the conditions of handling and
placing so that after compaction it surrounded all
reinforcement and completely filled the form.
The resulting concrete surface had to be
smooth and free from honeycombing. The
material, in conjunction with finishing activities,
had to be flat with no exposed steel fibres or
aggregate particles.
The maximum nominal aggregate size was 14
mm, however the overall grading of the materials
produced a concrete of the specified quality that
would work readily into position without
segregation or exhibiting a depth of bleed water
in excess of 0.2% of the height of the pour.
The minimum cement content was 360 kg/m3
and the maximum cement content was 450
kg/m3. The maximum free water / cement ratio
was 0.45.
The concrete design had to reflect a material
of low shrinkage characteristics. The concrete
included a shrinkage reducing or compensating
admixture and had a minimum drying shrinkage
of 0.03% at 28 days when assessed primarily
against ASTM C157.
Resistance to alkali silica reaction was to be
achieved through following the minimising
precautions within BS 8500:2 Section 5.2[1].
The concrete was to be of normal weight (i.e.
2000 – 2600 kg/m3). The maximum chloride class
of the concrete was Cl 0,20. The total acid
soluble sulphate content of the design could not
exceed 4.0% by weight of cementitious material.
WHAT IS EQUIVALENT FLEXURAL STRENGTH OF 4.5N/mm2
(fctm,eq300) AND ITS IMPACT ON THE DESIGN ?
The Equivalent Flexural Strength (fctm,eq300) is a
post crack flexural strength to a deflection of 1.5
mm and is attained through the inclusion of steel
fibres. A definition of fctm,eq300 is outlined in
Figure 1[2].
2727
An example of a bending test on a prismatic
sample is outlined in Figure 2 and relates to a
laboratory specimen incorporating the selected
fibre type and quantity.
An equivalent flexural strength of 4.5 N/mm2
(fctm,eq300) is a demanding requirement especially
given the likely in situ curing condition of the test
beams and the early age of compliance (i.e. 7
days). In such instances the selection of the
appropriate fibre is critical together with the
ability to harness the active involvement of the
fibre manufacturer over an extensive validation
program prior to implementation.
The author was aware of a fibre type that had
achieved values greater than 4.5 N/mm2, however
the test specimens were prepared under
laboratory conditions and tested at a later age
than 7 days. At certain dosages this fibre had
commendably provided good post crack
performance and a sustainable loading capacity
through a deflection term. Subsequent Re1.5 (i.e.
[equivalent flexural strength / modulus of
rupture]100) values reassuringly offered a high
percentage in comparison with other known
fibres. In principle, providing the performance
could be validated with the local design
constituents and account for the reduced initial
performance due to a lowered maturity (i.e. a
maturity associated with site curing and tested at
7 days), then a solution to this part of the
specification was feasible. Nevertheless, the
design would be required to accommodate a
good length, high performance cold drawn wire
fibre of a sizeable aspect ratio and allow for the
presence of over 225,000 of these fibres per
cubic metre.
SPECIFICATION LEADS
Validation processThe specification insisted on an extensive
validation process. This was undertaken to secure
customer satisfaction and ensure that
performance was achievable, prior to the
incorporation of the concrete into the final
works. Initial testing to determine the optimum
quantities of the constituents to satisfy the
requirements for the fresh and hardened
properties was required. In addition to the initial
testing, the concrete supplier was to undertake
trials to demonstrate constructability, the
suitability of the mix and compatibility with the
intended construction methods. In order to
satisfy these requirements full-scale site trials
formed part of the specification. The trials would
involve the approved/proposed materials, plant
and equipment and the typical reinforcement
configuration to be used in the final works.
The concrete supplier submitted details of the
initial testing against a detailed sampling regime
Figure 2: Prismatic sample beingprepared for testing
Figure 1: Load/deflection diagram for steel wire fibre reinforcement concrete
2828
especially in relation to compressive and
equivalent flexural strength. Each successful trial
required 75 cubic metres of the proposed
material to be batched and placed on two
occasions prior to commencing final works.
Silica fumeThe specification allowed for the use of a
slurried silica fume. The body utilised by the
main contractor in preparing the specification
were enthusiastic about the incorporation of this
material within the design.
The merits of silica fume from a durability
perspective are notable and in this instance
would serve to assist in meeting certain physical
criteria of the specification and reduce the ingress
of chloride ions. By extension, the use of silica
fume from a concrete rheology perspective also
aids cohesion and enhances the slickness of the
cementitious fraction which enabled greater
control over pumping especially in the context of
the number of fibres involved.
In certain countries where many of the
aggregates are alkali silica reactive and where the
available CEM I has a high alkali content, it is
reported[3]. that the use of silica fume at 5.0 to
7.5% by mass of cement has been effective in
preventing cracking caused by alkali silica
reaction. Conversely it is also reported that some
research has suggested that the replacement of
only 5% by mass of high alkali cement by silica
fume can result in increased expansion of the
concrete by alkali silica reaction. The design in
question did not incorporate high reactivity
aggregate types or high alkali cement, however
the paradoxical practice of increasing the level of
certain proportions beyond the so-called
pessimum level serves to minimise expansion to
insignificant levels. BRE Information Paper IP1/02
as referred to in BS 8500-2 5.2.7 states that
where a silica fume with greater than 85%
amorphous SiO2 is administered at a minimum of
8% silica fume by mass as a percentage of the
total binders, the damaging effects of alkali silica
reaction are considered to be minimised.
Curing / concrete warmingThe specification required that the concrete
surface immediately benefited from proven curing
techniques and by implication the effects of
curing would have an impact on early age
performance values. The specification allowed
for the concrete to be warmed and/or insulated
during the curing period. The main contractor
responded favourably to this lead and
implemented proven curing techniques and the
practice of trying to insulate against heat loss at
the end of each tunnel, thereby enabling the in
situ material to benefit from a temperature
greater than ambient.
London Weather CentreThe main contractor instigated a review of the
weather conditions at the proposed construction
period over the previous decade. It was found
that the London Weather Centre regularly record
temperatures from Clerkenwell Street throughout
the year. The past 10 years of data for the
proposed date of construction was made
available for consideration. It was found that it
was remarkably cold in 1996/97 and 2001/02,
but the mean hourly air temperature for the
proposed construction period over the past 10
years was 5.5˚C.
Balfour Beatty Rail ProjectsLimited
The main contractor was Balfour Beatty Rail
Projects Limited. Whilst the primary requirements
of the specification were demanding they were
made easier through a collaborative lead. This
does not mean that the specification was
changed or undermined but rather a strong
management structure existed within Balfour
Beatty Rail Projects Limited. As a result the
concrete supplier was invited to a number of
open meetings/project management forums and
furnished with regular updates on progress made.
An extensive part of the work was to identify the
makeup of the processes that would enable
successful completion, which involved
establishing and cataloguing the risk and to
formalise contingency plans where possible.
Immense emphasis was placed on both the
laboratory and site trials to the extent that a
proven performance was required prior to
implementation. The learning points from the
site trials were fairly assessed and best practices
identified. The main contractor wanted to
understand the product and capture the resource
of the concrete supplier in the promotion and
validation of the concrete solution.
Within establishing the processes to ensure
completion an array of items were considered
and as an example included such things as
secondary supply source; the verification of
material from that source; training of concrete
supplier operatives in new product; preparation
for cold weather/winter concreting; preparatory
operations on the plant; material resourcing and
stocking; resources for concrete validation and
training of technical operatives with new test
methods; assigning specialist test house to test
the prismatic specimens and to establish channels
for promptly reporting results at the required
interval to mention a few.
A common goal that existed was that there
was going to be nothing new to learn at the time
of placing the material into the final works as
such learning points would be derived and acted
on at the trial stage.
28th – 30th December 2003Upon reflection the events of the above dates
passed off fairly smoothly. The concrete was
produced, pumped, placed, finished and
compacted within the allotted time frame as
illustrated in Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6.
The tunnel was opened on time some 7 days
later and the trains were running over the
material without restriction. Compliance was
achieved at the given intervals of the
specification.
CONCLUSIONSCustomers are vital to the heavy building
materials sector and the ability to provide and
promote concrete solutions is essential.
To deliver effective and efficient concrete
solutions on time you have to be innovative and
follow the collaborative lead of customers who
share similar values.
A process of effective planning and
preparation close to the work face is essential
both to verify performance and secure an
acceptable order of confidence.
The ability to desensitise the concrete solution
to readily enable production, placement,
compaction and finishing is instrumental in
achieving success, yet possessing the balance to
maintain the required performance is a fine art.
2929
Figure 3: The concrete solution beingreceived at two pumps simultaneously
Figure 4: Concrete being lowered intothe Clerkenwell Tunnels by pump
Figure 5: The concrete solution beingpumped and placed in situ
Figure 6: The finished surface afterreceiving a spray of curing compound
3030
REFERENCES
1. BS 8500 – Part 1 & 2 2002 Method ofSpecifying and Guidance for the Specifiers& Specification for Constituent Materialsand Concrete.
2. Balfour Beatty Rail Projects Limited concretespecification for Thameslink 2000 – CTRLBlockade Enabling Works ClerkenwellTunnels 2 & 3 Crossovers – Trackslab.
3. BRE Information Paper IP1/02 Minimisingthe Risk of Alkali Silica Reaction: AlternativeMethods. Working Party into AlternativeMethods to Minimise ASR.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe author would like to acknowledge the
assistance of Johan Vermeeren of Bekaert for his
assistance in the verification of the design at
Bekaert laboratories in Zwevegen, Belgium.
31
Ann Lambrechts graduated in
1991 as a civil engineer at the
University of Leuven. She
joined the company Bekaert
and worked consecutively as
Manager Product
Development, Quality Engineer and Product
Manager. She is a member of several CEN
commissions dealing with fibres and fibre
concrete and is secretary of the FIB Taskgroup
8.3, responsible for the creation of design rules
for fibre concrete.
ABSTRACTThis paper discusses various material
characteristics of steel and polymer fibres, with
the translation into applications such as sprayed
concrete linings and flooring.
KEYWORDSMacro synthetic fibre, Steel fibre, Sprayed
concrete, Flooring
INTRODUCTIONSteel fibre reinforced concrete (SFRC) was
introduced into the European market in the
second half of the 1970s. No standards, nor
recommendations, were available at that time
which was a major obstacle for the acceptance of
this new technology. SFRC has been applied since
then in many different construction applications,
such as in tunnel linings, mining, floors on grade,
floors on piles, prefabricated elements, etc. In
the beginning, steel fibres were used as substitute
for secondary reinforcement or for crack control
in less critical constructions parts. Nowadays,
steel fibres are widely used as the main and
unique reinforcement for industrial floor slabs
and prefabricated concrete products. Steel fibres
are also considered for structural purposes,
helping to guarantee the construction’s ability
and durability in:
- foundation piles reinforcement
- reinforcement of slabs on piles
- full replacement of the standard reinforcing
cage for tunnel segments
- reinforcement of concrete basements and
slab foundations
- steel fibres as shear reinforcement in
prestressed construction elements.
This evolution into structural applications was
mainly the result of the progress in SFRC
technology, as well as the research done at
different universities and technical institutes in
order to understand and quantify the material
properties. In the early nineties, recommendations
for design rules for steel fibre reinforced concrete
started to be developed. From October 2003,
Rilem TC 162-TDF committee’s recommendations
for design rules are available for steel fibre
reinforced concrete.
Around the start of the millennium, suppliers
of micro synthetic fibres started to offer macro
synthetic fibres. Micro synthetic fibres are typically
6 to 12 mm long and have a diameter of 16 to
35 micron, and are widely used to reduce plastic
shrinkage cracks, as well as to reduce concrete
spalling during a fire. As Young’s Modulus of a
polyolefine is typically around 3000 to 5000 MPa,
it is generally understood that the reinforcing
effect of these fibres is gone after a couple of
hours of hardening of the concrete, as hardened
concrete typically shows a Young’s Modulus of
around 30 000 MPa. Macro synthetic fibres
typically have dimensions equal to steel fibres,
with lengths varying from 15 to 60 mm, and
diameters from 0.4 to 1.5 mm. Macro synthetic
fibres are to be considered as a relatively new
construction material, but are often marketed as
being equal to steel fibres. But is this really true?
MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF STEELAND POLYMER FIBRES
Young‘s Modulus of the fibresThe reinforcing ability of a fibre depends on
the anchorage of the fibre into the concrete, the
tensile strength and the Young’s Modulus.
The Young’s Modulus of concrete is typically
30 000 MPa, of steel fibre typically 210 000 MPa,
and of polyolefine fibre typically 3000 to 5000
MPa.
31
THE TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE OF STEEL
AND POLYMER-BASED FIBRE CONCRETE
Ann N. Lambrechts MSCE
N.V. Bekaert S.A., Belgium
32
For well anchored fibres, and equal solicitation
of the fibre, the elongation of the polymer fibre,
and the corresponding crack width in concrete,
might be considerably higher compared to steel
fibres. This might have an impact on the
durability of the concrete, especially in
combination with traditional reinforcement.
Tensile strength of the fibresThe tensile strength of steel wire is typically
1000 - 2000 MPa, compared to 300 - 600 MPa
for macro synthetic fibres.
Specific density of the fibresThe specific density of steel fibres is typically
7850 kg/m3, compared to 910 kg/m3 for polymer
fibres, and 1000 kg/m3 for water. Polymer fibres
are light, which is favourable for health and
safety, but they are lighter than water: the
polymer fibres actually float on water, with
potential risks for fibres at the surface in flooring
applications.
Fire resistance of the fibresPolypropylene fibres typically melt at
temperatures around 160°C. Therefore micro
polypropylene fibres are proven to be suitable for
improving fire resistance. The exact reason is not
yet fully understood, but it is generally accepted
that the fine micro fibres start to melt in extreme
fire conditions, thereby leaving small channels
through which the pressurised vapour can
escape. Consequently less damage, less spalling,
of the concrete is to be expected.
Macro synthetic fibres melt at the same
temperature, but are not fine enough to provide
the concrete under fire with the necessary
network of channels. Moreover, since the fibres
melt, they are less suitable in those buildings
where the reinforcing effect of the fibres is
important.
Resistance against oxidationPolymer fibres don’t rust, even if the fibres are
sticking out at the surface. Bright steel fibres can
show some staining if the fibres are at the
surface, but they never cause spalling of the
concrete. If, for aesthetical reasons, staining is
not allowed, as in some prefabricated structures,
galvanised steel fibres can be used.
Mixability of the fibresSome macro synthetic fibres tend to fibrillate
during mixing. This fibrillation process goes on in
the truck mixer, until all fibres are completely
destroyed. Quality degradation during mixing
does not occur with steel fibres.
PROPERTIES OF STEEL ANDMACRO SYNTHETIC FIBRE CONCRETE
Fibre concrete is well known for its ductility.
The effect of fibres is a combination of
reinforcement and networking. Steel fibres in
particular mainly change the behaviour of the
concrete: they transform a brittle concrete into a
ductile material which is able to withstand fairly
large deformations without loosing bearing
capacity. Ductility means load redistribution and a
higher bearing capacity of the structure with the
mechanical properties of the basic concrete
material unchanged.
Reinforcing effect measured in beam tests
In general, most macro synthetic fibres
perform rather moderately in a bending test. The
pure reinforcing effect is rather poor due to the
low Young’s Modulus and the rather low tensile
strength. As can be seen from the curves in
Figures 1 and 2, most macro synthetic fibres start
working at much larger crack widths than steel
fibres; steel fibres with anchorage, depending on
fibre type, typically work optimally at crack
widths of 0.5 to 1 mm, whereas macro synthetic
fibres work optimally after 3 mm of crack width
Figure 1: typical load / deflection curvefor 1% by volume of macro syntheticfibres
33
Creep of steel fibre and macrosynthetic fibre concrete
There is little information available as to the
creep of concrete reinforced with macro synthetic
fibres. The few papers that are available[3, 4] must
be treated with care because the conclusions are
sometimes based on a limited amount of test
specimens, the creep tests are executed on
different size test specimens, and different test
procedures, as no standard test procedure is
available, and some creep tests are executed only
over three months. The conclusion from those
papers is that the creep coefficient is, depending
on the type of the macro polymer fibres, of the
order of 1 to 20 times the creep coefficient for
steel fibre concrete.
In order to investigate the difference in creep
behaviour between steel fibre and macro
synthetic fibre reinforced concrete, N.V. Bekaert
has set up a test program to compare the creep
of both materials.
Beams have been produced at the Bekaert
laboratory using the following mix design:
427 kg/m3 Cement CEM I 42.5R
854 kg/m3 Sand 0/5
854 kg/m3 Broken limestone 4/7
w/c = 0,50
Macro synthetic fibres type1 and type 2 have
been added at a dosage of 4.55 kg/m3 (0.5 by
vol%).
Dramix“ RC-65/35-BN steel fibres have been
dosed at 20 kg/m3.
The beams have been pre-cracked: the beams
have been loaded in a displacement-controlled
way, as prescribed by most standards on steel
fibre concrete. At a deflection of 5 mm, the load
has been removed. The residual load at that
moment can be read from the load deflection
curve. (Figure 3)
The beams are now ready to be subjected to
the creep test. 50% of the residual load is
applied to the pre-cracked specimens. The load is
applied in a four-point bending configuration.
The deflection is measured, and shown on the Y-
axis in Figure 4. in hundredths of a millimetre.
As can seen from Figure 4, the polypropylene
fibres tend to creep 7 to 20 times more than the
steel fibres after 1 year. Moreover, the creep of
the macro synthetic fibre is not finished yet: the
creep curve for the macro synthetic fibre is not
yet stabilised. Therefore at present, the creep
tests are still going on, as considerably higher
creep can still be expected for the macro
synthetic fibres.
These deformations, of course, induce wider
cracks.
Figure 2: Typical load / deflection curvefor 0.5% of steel fibres with hookedends
Figure 3: Set-up of creep test
34
Design rules for steel and macrosynthetic fibres
Since October, 2003, Rilem TC 162-TDF
design guidelines have been available for steel
fibre concrete. No such guidelines are yet
available for macro synthetic fibre concrete.
Quality control of steel versusmacro synthetic fibre concrete
As part of the quality production control,
wash-out tests are quite common in order to
check the dosage of fibres in fresh concrete. This
is always time consuming, but a lot easier when
the fibres can be removed using a magnet, as is
the case for steel fibres.
FIBRE CONCRETE PROPERTIES TRANSLATED INTO FLOORING APPLICATIONS
It is generally accepted that a toughness ratio
(Re3) of minimum 30% is required of the fibre
concrete in order to be able to increase the load
bearing capacity of the fibre concrete floor in
bending. This can generally not be reached by
dosages lower than 4 kg/m3 for most macro
synthetic fibre types. Mixing a quantity as much
as 4 kg/m3 (0.4% by vol) requires special
attention. Moreover, there is the intrinsic
tendency of the fibre to float on top of the
concrete, which does not make it easier to power
float the surface.
It can be expected that an accidental shrinkage
or bending crack might result in a relatively wide
crack due to the low Young’s Modulus of the
polymer fibre, and that the crack might even
open further due to the expected creep.
FIBRE CONCRETE PROPERTIESTRANSLATED INTO SOIL SUPPORTING APPLICATIONS SUCH AS SPRAYED CONCRETE LININGS IN MINES
Immediately after the excavation of a tunnel,
the rock material is regarded as elastic. A short
time after excavation, the stress situation will
change and, if the rock is weak enough, a
crushed zone will develop around the tunnel
opening (plastic zone).
If some support is established, the Pi of Figure
5 represents the support pressure against the rock
surface. When designing the rock support
necessary to limit and stop deformation, the
ground reaction curve and the support curves are
used. Considering stable rock, as shown by the
dashed line 1 in Figure 5, the load decreases
when deformation is allowed to take place. No
support would be required here. For less stable or
fractured rock, as shown by the full line 2 in
Figure 5, the load increases again, due to the
weight of the broken plastic zone in the roof. In
this case support is needed, and should be
established before the plastic zone loses
cohesion.
Figure 4: Creep (deflection in 1/100 mm) with time (days)
35
The ability to sustain loads whilst undergoing
significant deflections needs to be an intrinsic
property of the chosen support system. The
presence of steel fibres in a concrete matrix, with
the potential to bridge and apply tension across
any cracks that form, has the ability to change an
inherently brittle material into a ductile one.
How do macro synthetic fibres compare
towards steel fibres in linings? With respect to
the hardened shotcrete, steel fibre reinforced
shotcrete is, typically, better at providing higher
post-crack residual load carrying capacity than
high volume synthetic fibre reinforced shotcretes
at low deformations when crack widths are
narrow. Hence steel fibre reinforced sprayed
concrete with a sufficient dosage of performant
fibres is generally preferred in permanent mine
works where a durable structure with near-
watertight conditions and narrow crack widths is
needed, e.g. underground hoist rooms, crusher
stations, electrical and pump rooms.
On the other hand, high volume macro
synthetic fibre reinforced shotcretes may display
good ductile behaviour at what is considered
larger deformations. As such, its use could be
considered in applications where larger ground
deformations, and hence wider cracks developing
in the shotcrete, are to be expected and are
allowed, such as temporary mining openings.
But, the support system has to withstand
continuously the ground pressure, particularly in
mining operations where the loading conditions
may even change frequently when mining is
going on. Creep becomes an issue. There is very
little information as to the creep of concrete
reinforced with macro synthetic fibres, or on the
ageing effect of these synthetic fibres in an
alkaline concrete matrix. As can be seen from
Figure 6, steel fibre reinforced shotcrete (SFRS)
has a minor creep behaviour keeping the extra
deformation under loading to a minimum while
sprayed concrete reinforced with synthetic fibres
shows a large increase in the deformation, which
finally may result in the collapse of the structure.
CONCLUSIONSteel fibre concrete/shotcrete has proved, over
the years, to be a reliable construction material.
After 30 years of experience, the first Rilem
design guidelines for steel fibre concrete were
edited in October, 2003.
New fibre concretes, such as macro synthetic
fibre concrete, are not yet fully understood, but
gain attention. Creep data, shear resistance, crack
control, durability, design methods, etc. are
lacking at the moment for macro synthetic fibre
concrete, but the experience will be gained.
REFERENCES
1. Rilem TC162-TDF: “Test and designmethods for teel fibre reinforced concrete”,TC Membership, Chairlady L. Vandewalle,Materials and Structures, Vol 36, October2003, p560-567
2. M. Vandewalle, The evolution of theinternational projects in the development ofsteel fibre reinforced concrete, presented atconference in Bergamot, Sept. 2004
3. J. MacKay, and J.F. Trottier, Post-crackbehavior of steel and synthetic FRC underflexural loading, Shotcrete: MoreEngineering Developments – Bernard (ed.),2004 Taylor and Francis Group, London,ISBN 04 1535 898 1
4. Bernard E.S. Creep of cracked fibrereinforced shotcrete panels in Shotcrete:More Engineering Developments – Bernard(ed.), 2004, Taylor and Francis Group,London, ISBN 04 1535 898 1
Figure 5: Support pressure after atunnel is excavated
Figure 6: Creep effect on the support of a lining
36
37
Peter de Vries is employed as a
technical service manager for
ENCI B.V. in the Netherlands.
ENCI is a sub-division of the
HEIDELBERGCEMENTGroup. As
a technical service manager
Peter is responsible for the technical support of
clients of ENCI. He acts as a freelance teacher for
the Dutch Concrete Society on topics such as
concrete technology, durability of concrete
structures and execution of concrete works.
He works on several standards committees for
concrete technology. Recently he has been working
on the introduction of EN 206 and the drawing up
of the Dutch national annex to EN 206.
ABSTRACTThe present design approach with respect to
durability of concrete structures is based on a
reasonable understanding of the main
degradation processes for (reinforced) concrete.
Concrete in a marine environment is exposed to
all kinds of harmful effects. This paper will give a
survey of the Dutch experience with concrete in
the marine environment and the very important
role of blastfurnace slag cement in relation to
durability.
KEYWORDSDurability, Marine environment, Sulfate attack,
Alkali silica reaction (ASR), Corrosion, Chloride
penetration, Heat development, Early age thermal
shrinkage, Ground granulated blastfurnace slag
(GGBS), DuraCrete.
INTRODUCTIONDue to the high construction costs and the
social importance, the durability demands for
large infrastructures becomes more and more
important.
A research project of the European Community
with the name DuraCrete has developed the
existing reliability and performance based
structural design method by introducing the
modelling of degradation and environmental
actions.
Performing probabilistic calculations show,
however, that the outcome is largely influenced
by the accuracy of the input parameters. I will
certainly not refuse the DuraCrete approach
because I think it is a good way to get more
understanding of degradation processes. The
DuraCrete approach, however, is not ready yet to
be used in our daily routine.
The present design approach with respect to
durability of concrete structures is based on a
reasonable understanding of the main
degradation processes for concrete,
reinforcement and prestressed steel. The design,
however, is not explicitly formulated as a service
life. It is based on deem-to-satisfy rules and the
assumption that if these rules are met, the
structure will achieve an acceptable long but
unspecified life.
This paper is about the Dutch experience with
concrete in the marine environment in the past
hundred years and what we have learned of the
behaviour of concrete in this environment.
Major data concerning thedevelopment of cement
1824 Is the year in which Joseph Aspdin
gained the patent on the development of
Portland cement; a very important moment in the
concrete industry.
But it was Isaac Charles Johnson, supervisor of
John Bazley, White & Sons in Swanscombe, who
improved the process of making clinker by using
unusually strong heat until the raw material was
nearly vitrified.
In 1853 a German blastfurnace operator
started water granulation of the molten slag. The
granules could easily be transported and
deposited which was an advantage over the air
cooling applied up till then. It was Emil Lange
who, in 1862, discovered the latent hydraulic
properties of the water granulated blastfurnace
slag. Initially the slag was activated by lime. Later
on Portland cement was used as an activator.
In 1888 the first blastfurnace cement works
was opened in Germany. Already from the
beginning blastfurnace slag cement was used for
concrete exposed to harsh conditions.
MARINE CONCRETE EXPERIENCE IN THE NETHERLANDS
-WHAT HAS BEEN LEARNED?
Peter de Vries, FICT
ENCI B.V. HEIDELBERGCEMENTGROUP, NETHERLANDS
38
In 1917 the Minister of Public Affairs in
Pruisen (Germany) declared, based on extensive
research by the Material Testing Institute in Berlin,
that blastfurnace cement had an equivalent
performance in concrete compared to ordinary
Portland cement.
This is a major statement for concrete in the
marine environment.
In 1912 the first Dutch Standard for reinforced
concrete was published (GBV 1912). Any
description on concrete technology is very poor.
Cement should be an industrially produced
cement but without any additions of slag. The
cement producer must have a reliable reputation.
The source of sand and gravel should be the river.
The code gives a standardized prescribed
concrete. To get a certain guarantee for a good
quality of concrete the amount of cement is
based on kilograms. The amount of water
depends on the preferred workability for mixing
and placing the concrete.
EXAMPLES OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES IN THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT
Concrete to protect dunes anddams
According to the GBV 1912, a lot a concrete
has been used for the protection of dunes, dams
and dykes by a combination of concrete slabs and
beams.
Although the addition of slag was prohibited,
it was well know in those days that the
combination of Portland cement and a pozzolanic
material such as trass gives the concrete good
resistance against the deterioration of seawater.
Trass is a volcanic rock with its origin in the Eifel
mountains in Germany.
Probably due to the poor way of placing the
concrete, most of this type of protection has
disappeared. It turned out not to be durable
enough and the concrete, no longer protecting
the dunes and dykes, has been replaced by basalt
rock.
Locks near IJmuidenOne of first major projects in marine
conditions is the construction of the locks in
IJmuiden. In 1876, the Kleine Sluis, or small lock,
was opened at IJmuiden concurrently with the
Noordzeekanaal, the connection between
Amsterdam and the North Sea. It soon became
apparent that its 120 by 18 metres was too small
and in 1896 the Groote Sluis or Middensluis (225
by 25 m) was brought into use. The rapid
increase in both the number and the size of
vessels led to the construction of a third lock. The
largest ocean liners had to be able to reach the
Dutch capital with ease. The work started in 1921
and was completed in 1930. At that time the
Noordersluis (400 m by 50 m and 15 m deep)
was consequently regarded as a monument of
national strength. For a full fifty years the lock
was the largest in the world.
1824 – Joseph Aspdin, chemical compositionfor Portland cement
1844 – Johnson, optimising burning clinkerprocess
1888 – Germany, opening of first blastfurnacecement works
1917 – Germany: blastfurnace cement has anequal performance to Portland cement
Table 1: Major Dates
Figure 1: Concrete to protect dunes and dams
Figure 2: Noordersluisunder construction
39
The two smaller locks had been constructed
before we had any Standard on reinforced
concrete and no specification on concrete had
been available. It is most likely that the cement
used for this concrete was only ordinary Portland
cement. After a service life of more than ninety
years it was necessary to demolish the
construction and to rebuild the two small locks
completely.
Before the year 1994 we thought that the
problem of alkali silica reaction was only a
problem in foreign countries and the diagnosis
was that those locks had only suffered from
sulfate attack. But ASR was also recognized in the
construction.
At the time the Noordersluis was built the
second version of the Dutch Standard on
reinforced concrete was available (GBV 1918).
And also in this Standard the use of cement with
blastfurnace slag was not permitted.
But, for the construction of the big Lock the
engineers decided to deviate from this Standard.
A normal mix design at that time was a 1:2:3
volume by volume for cement, sand and gravel.
The experts, however, had the opinion that a
composition like this was too permeable for such
an important structure. They also realised that
increasing the cement content was not
favourable because of thermal shrinkage in the
massive construction. The engineers decided to
use blastfurncace slag cement for the massive
walls of the biggest ship lock at that time in
world.
This decision was also based on the
development in Germany and an extensive testing
programme executed by Dyckerhoff.
Many trial mixes were made, very well
documented, and over 10,000 cubes were
tested; tests on strength, water absorption, heat
development and durability in seawater.
Several mixes were developed and, depending
the part of the construction, a choice was made
between Portland cement in combination with
trass as a pozzolanic binder and for blastfurnace
slag cement.
The slag content of the blastfurnace slag
cement was approximately 45- 50 %.
The cement content varied between 380 and
450 kg /m3.
Typically, the amount of mixing water is not
well documented. The role of the water/cement
ratio seemed to be unknown.
The workability of the mixture, or in other
words the way that the concrete was transported
placed and compacted, determined the water
content.
During several years now the big lock goes
through a thorough maintenance project.
Particularly concerning the lock heads,
concrete elements suffering from ASR have been
removed.
The service buildings and the gate chambers
are renovated. But the lock chamber walls are in
perfect shape after 75 years of service life.
Even a close look at the concrete tells that
there are no signs of corrosion or chemical attack
going on. We expect this structure to perform
well over the next coming decades.
Locks and sluices in Afsluitdijk Between 1927 and 1932 The State
Department of Roads and Waterways,
Rijkswaterstaat, constructed the thirty kilometre
long Afsluitdijk in the north area of the
Netherlands between Noord Holland and
Friesland. By building this dyke, protection against
flooding of a large area in the centre of Holland
has been guaranteed
Constituents Typical Mix Designs
Lock head Chamber walls and floors
Litres Ratio (v/v) Litres Ratio (v/v)
Portland Cement (CEM I) 225 1
Trass (pozzolanic) 56 1/4
Blastfurnace Cement (CEM III) -- -- 240 1 1/8
Fine sand 193 0,85 193 0,9
Coarse sand 387 1,7 387 1,8
Gravel 700 3,1 700 3,3
Water ?? ?? ?? ??
Table 2: Typical mix designs
40
The Afsluitdijk contains a system of concrete
sluices that allows the Ijsselmeer to discharge
water into the sea twice a day at low water. To
spread the discharge stream over a sufficient
width, two sluice complexes were built into the
dyke. They have been described as the lungs of
the IJsselmeer: the Stevinsluizen at Den Oever
and the Lorentzsluizen at Kornwerderzand.
Rising more than seven metres above the road
deck, the twelve towers per block of five sluices
dictate to a large degree the silhouette of the
complexes.
For the free passage of fishing boats and cargo
ships several locks were build on both sides near
Den Oever and Kornwerderzand.
From a certain distance the whole construction
and concrete looks all right.
Looking at it closely, it is evident that the
concrete structure suffers from sulfate attack and
alkali silica reaction. The State Department
decided in 1993 to implement an extensive
maintenance programme during the next five
years. Total costs around 20 million Euro.
At some spots the concrete had to be removed
for over 400 mm.
The constructive safety of the total structure is
not in danger. And the aim of the repair method
is to decrease the possibility of further damage.
After completion of the renovation, the locks
and sluices remain subject to routine inspection
and yearly maintenance.
HaukesschutsluisIn this same period many more locks were
built. A good example is the Haukesschutsluis.
As mentioned before, until only fifteen years
ago, alkali-silica-reaction was not known to be
present in our constructions. We thought that
sulfate attack was the major cause of
deterioration of concrete structures. Petrographic
examination on cores taken from several locks
showed that alkali silica gel was present most of
the time. Drilling of the cores was difficult
because of delamination of the concrete.
It is surprising to see that the damage to the
concrete above water level is more severe than
below. The explanation for this is that the
damage might be a combination of ASR and
frost attack. Due to the high water/cement ratio
and/or bad compaction, the concrete of many
locks is not frost-resistant.
As a result of the survey, recommendations
were made for maintenance and repair.
It was found that the constructive safety of the
Haukesschutsluis was no longer guaranteed.
The many delaminations and regular spalling
of concrete forms a danger for passing ships.
Also, the combination of low water in the lock
chamber and a high level of groundwater is a risk
for the stability of the lock chamber walls.
It has been decided not to repair this lock but
to build a new one.
Figure 3: Haukesschutsluis
41
In 1930 a successive version of the Standard
on reinforced concrete (GBV 1930) was
published.
Not surprisingly that blastfurnace slag cement
was permitted now. But only when customer and
contractor have agreed upon it.
That means that the acceptance of
blastfurnace cement was not unconditional.
For the Haukesschutsluis, and a few other
locks and sluices this Standard is too late. The
cement type normally used was Portland cement
from Germany or a combination of Portland
cement and trass, a pozzolanic rock.
The production of blastfurnace slag cement in
the Netherlands did not start until 1931.
Concrete blocks to protect jettiesA good example of a very simple manner of
using concrete for protection is the use of big
concrete blocks for the protection of the jetties of
the harbour in IJmuiden and also other locations.
Those blocks form an open structure to break
the energy of the waves during stormy weather.
The choice of an open structure was made
more than seventy years ago.
The massive blocks had to be produced in a
short period of time. In the early days, to speed
up production, an ordinary Portland cement was
used. The contractor was able to use the
formwork daily but not realizing that doing so he
introduced several technological problems that
reduced the durability dramatically.
The hydration will increase the temperature of
the concrete and in massive concrete
constructions in particular. When this temperature
is constant over the cross-section no problem will
occur. But changes in the temperature profile
across the section can cause one part of the
section to restrain the movement of another part
of the same section. For example, if the
formwork is removed while the concrete is still
hot, the rapid cooling and contraction of the
surface zone is restrained by the hot interior and
the surface cracks. These cracks can penetrate
significantly, but, because of the position of the
restraint, cannot be continuous through the
section. As the core cools, the cracks tend to
close up. Because of the higher temperature the
core continues to contract more than the surface
zones and its contraction becomes restrained by
the surface zone. This results in compressive
Figure 4: Internal restraint causes thermal cracks
42
stresses in the surface zones and tensile stresses
in the core. (see Figure 4)
The evidence that internal cracks occur as a
result of tensile stresses in the core can been seen
in practice. The small cracks will be saturated
continuously with water that will expand during
times of frost. Beside that, the massive blocks are
exposed to the mechanical impact of the waves
year after year.
What happened is that the originally cubic
blocks end up as nearly rounded blocks initiated
by the internal cracks. At the same time we see a
deposit of ettringite that is not surprising in this
marine environment.
These days the blocks are produced
conforming to a precise prescribed standard:
cement type: CEM III/B 42,5 N LH HS,
environmental Class: XA3,
aggregate: combination of gravel, sand
and magnetite.
To reduce the temperature gradient across the
section, the temperature difference between the
core and the surface shall not exceed the 25ºC.
The AtlantikwallA completely different type of coastal defence
appeared in the dunes more than sixty years ago.
And the enemy was not exactly the seawater.
Since the second world war the Germans left us a
few souvenirs. Not only in Holland but
throughout Europe; The Altlantikwall. The
Atlantikwall consisted of a number of strong-
points and these consisted of bunkers that were
present in all kind of sizes and different functions.
For example: gun emplacements, hospitals,
ammunition storage, housing, radar bunkers, etc.
The major goal was to protect men and material
from enemy attacks.
The thickness of the walls varied from 300 mm
for small shelters to 7 metres for those which had
to resist an attack from submarine missiles. To
speed up the construction of the bunkers,
Germans standardized those bunkers: the amount
of concrete, amount of steel, ventilation system,
electrical system, etc.
Whilst transport was available, German
cement of good quality was used in the
construction of the Atlantic Wall, but as the war
progressed supplies were increasingly drawn from
occupied countries. That happened in Holland as
well. From old reports we can read that the
Dutch Cement Industry was also forced to deliver
cement to the Germans. The cement plant in
IJmuiden is only within a stone’s throw away from
the bunkers near Wijk aan Zee. Therefore these
bunkers have been constructed using
blastfurnace slag cement.
A brief inspection, just a few weeks ago,
revealed that the concrete looks safe and sound
and that these bunkers will stay there for decades
and decades. In the meantime the Dutch
Government has declared that these souvenirs are
now part of our national inheritance.
At a few places you can find some corrosion
of the reinforcement. But this corrosion is only
due to a total lack of concrete cover as a result of
inadequate execution.
The DELTA-ProjectIn February 1953 the North Sea struck
mercilessly. Large areas of the islands in the south
west of the Netherlands were swallowed. Around
eight percent of the total territory of the
Netherlands was under water. More than 1800
people drowned. Around 1000 km of dykes
turned out to be too low and had to be raised.
Figure 5: Protection of jetty by concreteblocks
Figure 6: Bunker as a part of theAtlantikwall
43
The government decided to close the tidal in-
and outlets by heavy dams. To do so the coastline
was cut down by 700 km. The Delta project was
born.
With the start of the construction of the
Haringvliet sluice complex in 1958 the south west
of the Netherlands became the biggest civil
engineering site we had ever seen. And concrete
was a major building material.
The requirements for the concrete were based
on the expert opinion of that time.
For the large infrastructures the requirements
with respect to durability were in general more
stringent than the codes. The concrete cover was
raised to 70 mm, the water/cement ratio was
restricted to 0,45 and blastfurnace slag cement
was used as a binder.
The information about the service life to
achieve was, to a large extent, empirical. No
method had been specified to prove this service
life. Since the concrete codes are only based on
deem–to–satisfy rules for durability.
For the Eastern Scheldt Barrier, designed and
build in the early eighties, the durability
requirements were for the first time expressed in
terms of time. A service life of 200 years had
been required. For the concrete cover this was
not feasible. A mean service life of about 85 year
has therefore been accepted. Already during the
design provisions have been made for
maintenance in the future.
The storm surge barrier across the Eastern
Scheldt is, with a length of 2800 m, the most
impressive part of the Delta works.
In order to affect the natural tidal range as
little as possible the barrier contains 62 openings
that can be closed by steel sliding doors when
there is an increased risk of flooding. During
normal weather conditions the sliding doors are
fixed in a raised position. Only during periods of
severe storm the barrier will close by lowering the
steel sliding doors. The complete barrier
comprises 65 monolithic piers. The concrete piers
are considered to be the backbone of the storm
surge barrier transferring the forces exerted by a
storm to the foundations.
Each pier was cast in several phases. The
concrete composition of each phase contained
350 kg per cubic metre of CEM III/B and the
target water/cement ratio was 0,45. The concrete
was actively cooled with cooling tubes. From the
construction records we get the information that
cooling started 6 hours after casting had started
and continued for almost the next four days. The
maximum registered temperature was 36 degrees
Celsius. The concrete cover to the reinforcement
should be from 70 up to 100 mm.
CONCRETE IN THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT
After discussing several concrete structures in a
marine environment it is time to gather our
experience.
Concrete in a marine environment is exposed
to several parameters that will influence the
service life of the structure. Sulfates, alkalis and
chlorides all have their own destructive quality.
Concrete structures in a marine environment are
usually massive and that means that we have to
be aware of early thermal cracking. At this
moment concrete technology has a simple
Figure 7: The flood of February 1953
Figure 7: Eastern Scheldt storm surgebarrier
44
solution for these potential problems:
blastfurnace slag cement as binder. (see Table 3)
Dutch civil engineers use CEM III/B when the
concrete construction is exposed to chlorides and
sulfates. No other cement type will be accepted.
Only from recent experience are we aware that
also in the Netherlands ASR might be a problem.
Not only some locks and sluices suffered from
ASR, several bridges were suspect as well. That
means that technical instructions to prevent ASR
had to be developed.
In 1994 the first CUR Recommendation
appeared and since then this document has
evaluated a few times. The latest version
describes exhaustively the testing of the
aggregate itself.
We must realize that this is a complex
procedure.
More easy are the rules for the concrete
composition depending on the environment of
the construction, the type of cement in particular;
use CEM III/B.
The technical motivation about the prevention
of ASR has been explained by Prof. dr. Jan Beijen
in his publication “Blast Furnace Slag Cement for
Durable Marine Structures [1] : Concrete in a wet
environment and the possibility of de-icing salts,
seawater or in environmental class XA shall be
made with a cement type II – Portland fly-ash
cement or with blast furnace slag cement CEM
III/B or CEM III/C.
Without giving an order of importance, the
following factors contribute to the favourable
behaviour of blast furnace slag cement in
concrete:
• in general the alkalinity of the pore water is
less
• there is not very much free lime available:
free lime is regarded by some experts as
essential for alkali-silica expansion
• the interfacial zone between aggregate and
matrix is very small and none or only a little
amount of free lime is present
• the mobility of the ions is much reduced.
Therefore the building-up rate of stresses is
decreased. Brodersen in 1982 already
showed the relation between the slag
content and the diffusion coefficient for
sodium ions. (see Figure 9).
CALCULATION OF SERVICE LIFE TIME
In the specifications for new concrete
structures it has become more and more
accepted that the designer should demonstrate
that a concrete structure will have reliable
performance during a defined service life.
To guarantee a target service life of let’s say
one hundred years we have to calculate on an
average service lifetime of 400 – 600 years.
The methodology for performance-based
service life design of concrete structures has been
developed in a European BRITE EuRam research
Deterioration of concrete Protection of concrete Solution
sulfate attack cement type HS:
- low C3A; CEM III/B
- > 65% slag;
low permeability
alkali silica reaction cement type LA CEM III/B
low permeability
corrosion of reinforcement low permeability CEM III/B
cracks caused by early cement type LH CEM III/B
thermal shrinkage
Table 3: Deterioration of concrete and the rational solution
Figure 9: Relationship between diffusioncoefficient and slag content
45
project called “Probabilistic Performance based
Durability Design of Concrete Structures, in short
“DuraCrete”.
The results have been formulated in a set of
service life design equations. These equations are
based on mathematical models of degradation
and environmental influences on materials,
combined with probabilistic calculations of the
performance of the structure.
The most advanced model, however, is the
model describing chloride-induced corrosion,
more than models for other types of degradation.
A CUR research committee, Durability of
Marine Concrete Structures (DuMaCon) is
working on an extensive research program to
collect data and to validate the service life model
developed in the DuraCrete program.
The Haringvliet Sluice Complex is chosen as
one of the structures in this research program. [2]
For example, the piers of the Haringvliet sluice
complex have been investigated thoroughly in the
course of this examination. The main objective in
this investigation was to examine the influence of
the height on the exposure of the concrete that is
one of the parameters in the DuraCrete
approach. Therefore, three locations have been
chosen on the same pier at different heights.
On site, each test area of about 1 m2 of
concrete surface was investigated in depth to
collect the following data:
• Visual examination and description of test
area
• Determination of rebar position and depth
• Determination of carbonation depth
• Measurement of concrete resistivity by
Wenner
• Measurement of rebar potential
• Measurement of corrosion current.
Also from each test area various core samples
have been taken for further investigation in the
laboratory to collect data on:
- Chloride profiles
- Microscopy
- Tensile splitting strength
- Rapid chloride migration (RCM)
- Compressive strength
- Electrical resistivity (TEM).
Chloride profiles have been determined up to
a depth of 60 mm. Then, using those chloride
profiles, diffusion coefficients can be determined,
assuming that Fick’s second law applies and that
the surface chloride content and the diffusion
coefficient are constant.
When analysing the data it is found that the
chloride ingress in the tidal zone is much greater
than in the other test areas. Chloride content
levels are expected to be the highest in this test
area. This test area has also been chosen to
perform probabilistic calculations according to the
DuraCrete approach.
The starting point for calculations is the
assumption that the service life time has finished
when the critical chloride content to start
corrosion has reached the reinforcement.
The probability of initiation of corrosion of 3%
(reliability index b = 1,8) is reached on a time
scale of 100 to 200 years depending on which
model of DuraCrete is used for the calculations.
As far as can be judged now, after 40 years of
exposure, these model calculation results are
supported by visual and electrochemical
observations.
Also the Eastern Scheldt Surge Barrier has
been observed and tested.[3] And from that
experience and calculations we can see that,
Figure 10: Haringvliet Sluice Complex
Figure 11: Example of measured chlorideprofiles
46
using the same DuraCrete-model, the time-to-
initiation of corrosion is very short and differs
from only several months up to 8 years. This
seems not to be realistic because the exposure
time is only 20 years now and the investigation
shows that the concrete structure is in a very
good condition. That means that the model does
not fit with reality.
Until the accuracy of the parameters as used in
the DuraCrete models is better understood, the
large differences will remain.
And that means that we do not have to worry
about our scientists, they have plenty of work to
do to optimise their models.
CONCLUSIONSIn the meantime I think that we have
demonstrated that concrete in a marine
environment needs the law of good common
concrete practice:
• make the right choice of cement type, i.e.
CEM III/B
• take care of sufficient cover
• take care of sufficient curing.
As simple as that; the results we have obtained
in the past are the guarantee for the future.
Concrete for a new world has been developed
in the past.
REFERENCES
1. BIJEN,J. Blast furnace Slag Cement forDurable Marine Structures,VNC/BetonPrisma, 1998 pp. 62.
2. DE ROOIJ, M.R. and POLDER,R.B.Investigation of the influence of marineexposure on concrete piers of theHaringvliet sluice complex, TNO Report2003-CI-R0122-2, 2004, pp.22.
3. DE ROOIJ, M.R. and POLDER,R.B.Investigation of the concrete structure ofthe Eastern Scheldt Barrier after 20 years ofexposure to marine environment, TNOReport 2002-CI-R2118-3, 2004, pp.48.
47
Peter Kelly is a chartered
structural engineer with over
30 years of experience in the
design of structures in all
materials. He is a member of
the Council and of various
Committees’ of the Institution of Structural
Engineers. A member of the Techical Committee
of the International Precast Hollowcore
Asssociation and he has been the Technical
Director for Bison Concrete Products for the last 8
years.
His principal material is concrete, where he has
been responsible for the design of offices
(including the BRE Eco building), hospitals, retail
buildings and associated car parking (Manchester
Trafford Centre) together with most of the recent
major stadia (Manchester Utd, Hull, Leicester City
and Wembley).
Nick Webb has been
Operations Engineer for Bison
Concrete Products at their
Lichfield factory for the last 10
years and has been responsible
for the technical and quality
management for all production, including major
stadia; for example, Millennium Stadium Cardiff,
Manchester Utd, Leicester City and Wembley. He
has also been responsible for the development
and implementation of self-compacting concrete
in the works.
ABSTRACTThis paper reviews the role of precast concrete
in modern sports stadia showing the compelling
reasons for its use. It concentrates on the
development that Bison Precast Concrete has
undertaken in recent years in design,
manufacture and erection of the components to
suit the needs of modern construction practise.
KEYWORDSStadia, Precast concrete, Quality, Design,
Terrace units, Vomitory units, Stairs, Off-site
production, Installation.
INTRODUCTIONIn order to meet the stringent programme
requirements in today’s modern stadia, speed of
construction is a major and critical requirement.
Precast concrete components contribute a major
part in achieving this objective. These
components include floors, terrace units,
vomitories, stairs and the supporting frames. This
paper covers the following important aspects of
the use of precast concrete in stadia:
• The benefits of precast concrete,
• The structural aspects of stadia design,
• The manufacture of precast components,
• The site application of precast.
THE COMPELLING REASONS FOR PRECAST CONCRETE
An analysis of the criteria for the use of
precast concrete highlights the compelling
reasons for the use of precast concrete in stadia.
These benefits are:
a) Off-site production
On-site activities are complicated by a great
many factors such as:
• bad weather
• overlapping trades and the logistical problem
of large quantities of materials and labour
within a relatively confined space
• it is much easier to cast a concrete
component on the factory floor than several
metres up in the air.
b) Control of quality
• All contractors and designers acknowledge
that the quality of components produced
under factory conditions is far superior to
those produced on site
• Bison were one of the first to introduce a
quality system into the manufacture of
precast products. The system is assessed by
BSI each year, from design through to
manufacture, at each of the company’s
locations.
THE ROLE OF PRECAST CONCRETE IN STADIA
Peter Kelly BSc, CEng, MIStructE and Nick Webb
Bison Concrete Products Ltd
48
c) Speed of erection
• The principal advantage of the use of precast
concrete is the speed of erection.
Programme is always a major consideration
for any project and this is even more so
where stadia clients require a rapid return on
investment
• The key feature of precasting is that the
superstructure work is progressing off-site
while the foundations are being constructed.
d) The provision of an immediate working
platform.
• The erection of a precast structure allows the
use of that floor or terrace area immediately.
Floors can be stood on and worked from
• The provision of precast stairs allows access
to the floors and terrace areas
• Following trades have easy access and a
reduction in the construction programme is
possible.
e) Minimum propping
• Most precast components are designed with
minimum or no propping and comparison
with in situ construction is obvious. In situ
construction, with large numbers of props
for formwork, is time consuming in erection
and stripping and is, at worst, impractical
due to high floor-to- ceiling heights.
f) Minimum wet trades
• Since the objective of precasting is to cast
the concrete off-site, it follows that there is
major reduction or the virtual elimination in
the volume of concrete to batched at the site
or delivered by other means. Precast walls as
a replacement for conventional masonry
avoid the need for large quantities of mortar,
bricklaying labour, plasterwork and again the
reduction is time.
THE STRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF STADIA DESIGN
The use of precast components in stadia
provides many structural design advantages
which are summarised below.
FloorsThe use of hollow core slabs with or without
structural topping provides significant advantages
to the contractor. They are extremely structurally
efficient and may be combined with the
steelwork to enable the steel to be designed
compositely. This can lead to significant
reductions in steel tonnages and site time due to
the reduction in the number of steel members.
For hollow core slabs the concrete strength is 55
N/mm2 together with 5 mm diameter prestressing
wire having a tensile strength of 1770 N/mm2.
Design allows for the final forces and for the
handling of the units during the early stages.
Hollow core slabs of 200 mm depth can provide
spans of 7 – 8 m for grandstand loadings.
Terrace UnitsThe design of terrace units requires careful
attention to ensure the maximum benefit for the
project. The main considerations are the seating
details, geometry of the unit and practical
reinforcement detailing.
The design of terrace units is based on a simple
reinforced concrete design with a minimum beam
section of 150 mm. The beam section is increased
Figure 1: General details of terrace unit
49
in width only to accommodate reinforcement.
The terrace units are designed to optimise the
concrete section/reinforcement relationship
together with maintaining the rigidity of the unit
for dynamic purposes. The general details are
given in Figure 1.
The detail at the seating stool is dictated by
practical reinforcement detailing. A minimum
seating of 165 mm is required but for large spans
this may need to be increased to cater for larger
anchorage bars. Where the depth of the unit is
restricted by the riser height then a downstand
below the tread is provided. As the rise of each
terrace alters as the ‘C’ values alter, the terrace
units were grouped together in a rise of 10 – 15
mm for practical purposes.
Vomitory UnitsVomitory units are the second unique type of
unit to be found in stadia and provide the access
and egress to the terrace areas from the
concourse and circulation areas. The vomitory
units consist of walls supporting the terrace units
and stairs. See figure 6. These are seated onto
the floors and steelwork at the concourse level.
Cast-in sockets together with stainless steel
fittings provide both for location of the walls and
support for the terrace units.
StairsThe total of number of stairs supplied may
account for 10% of the precast concrete for a
scheme. See figure 2. Stairs can be designed
utilising Bison’s standard mould system and the
appropriate geometry. The design allows for the
use of stair flights with angles supported by
intermediate landings. Finishes are required on
the landings to take up tolerances of
manufacture and site construction. The provision
of stairs allows immediate access to the various
levels making the need for scaffold access
redundant.
Support BeamsAlthough steel is generally used for beam
supports in stadia, concrete raker and support
beams can used. Connection of transverse beams
can be provided using the Bison BSF connector.
This is a simple yet extremely strong connection.
See figure 3 below.
THE MANUFACTURE OF PRECAST COMPONENTS
Terrace and associated unitsThe manufacture of the terrace and associated
units is undertaken utilising steel moulds. See
figure 4. The manufacture of these units utilises
Figure 2: General details of terrace unit
Figure 3: The BSF connectorFigure 4: Mould prior to placingconcrete
50
self compacting concrete and, together with
magnetic formers, allows for a high quality finish
to be obtained. The terrace units are
manufactured using Bison’s standard terrace
mould used on many of the stadia throughout
the country. The terrace units are cast with the
tread part vertical and the beam part horizontal.
This enables all faces of the terrace to be cast
against steel mould faces, except for the rear of
the beam which is a float finish. The units
provided have a fall to the front of 1:100 to
facilitate the removal of water. Handling of the
units is undertaken using standard Deha lifters for
handling in the factory and on the site.
The vomitory walls were cast in vertical steel
battery moulds. Components to allow fixing of
the walls to form a completed unit were cast-in
where required.
Stair manufacture was undertaken using
Bison’s standard stair moulds. The steps are
formed using adjustable formers with preset
treads and a set cut-back rake. The moulds allow
the manufacture of the stairs on their side
ensuring that, apart from one string and the end
of the unit, the cast faces are against the steel of
the mould. A view of a typical stair mould is
illustrated below. Handling of the units was
undertaken using standard Deha lifters for
handling in the factory and the site.
Hollow core flooring is manufactured by slip
forming, using the long-line method. The units
were manufactured with notched and prepared
ends to allow for composite action between the
slabs and the steelwork. The concrete is a dry mix
with a high level of vibration to allow the
formation of the slab.
Manufacture of all the components for the
project was subject to a quality assurance
scheme. Bison Concrete Products Limited were
one of the first to obtain a registration with BSI
for the manufacture of precast concrete. The
system covers the design and manufacture of all
precast components from estimate to delivery.
The system is regularly inspected internally and
externally to ensure compliance with the objects
of the scheme.
The site application of precastIt must be recognised that the expertise of the
installer in the erection of precast concrete is
paramount. The installation of any precast
concrete component requires that the installers
understand the procedures for a successful
installation. The installer must consider the
following:
• The management of the health and safety of
the operation
• The adequate training of the personnel
involved
• Design considerations
• The responsibilities of the general contractor
and the installation contractor
• The importance of the foreman’s role
Figure 5: Installation of terrace units
51
• On site storage of components
• The safe use of cranes etc
• Access to the site and to the working area
• Installation of the components and other site
work
• Protection of the workforce and third parties.
The successful installation of any project relies
entirely upon a well thought out plan of action
and the implementation of safe and correct
procedures to achieve that. The typical installation
of terrace units is shown in Figure 5.
The installation of the terrace units shows the
provision of neoprene pads at the bearing
position with further shims at the toe of the unit.
The initial unit installed sets the standard for the
subsequent units and therefore it is important
that the unit is correctly installed with the correct
level to avoid any back fall of the terrace units.
The units are subsequently sealed to prevent
water ingress.
Vomitory units are installed in a strict order -
walls and head beam, terrace units and finally the
stair unit. The walls are erected with lateral props.
The head wall is then fixed using a cast in bolt
connection. Stainless steel location angles are
provided at the floor level. The terrace units are
then fixed onto stainless steel angles on the sides
of the walls. The stairs are finally fixed seated on
the floor and onto the terrace unit along the
front of the vomitory unit. See Figure 6.
SUMMARYIn summary, the case for using precast
concrete is overwhelming. A well defined design
brief and carefully thought out details are
essential on a fastrack programme. Manufacture
to the right standard, on time requires planning,
manufacturing expertise and good quality
controls. Installation requires to be controlled by
experienced personnel working to a well thought
out erection plan.
Any project relies on the people involved and
therefore the choice of a contractor and his
design team is paramount.
Finally remember: keep it simple, and the
benefits of precast will contribute to a successful
and economic stadium.
Figure 6: Vomitory unit Installation
52
53
Lawrence R Roberts, over the
last 37 years, has been in
various research and technical
service positions with W. R.
Grace and Co., and is currently
Key Accounts Technical
Manager, with global responsibility. He has been
involved in admixture and cement additive
development and investigation, problem
resolution, and in some cases advised in cement
alteration for improved admixture response. He is
past chairman of ASTM subcommittees on
Admixtures and Cement Research, and
participates in many technical organizations
centred on cement and concrete. He holds
Bachelors and Masters degrees in Chemistry.
ABSTRACTThis paper discusses recent advances in our
understanding the interaction of admixtures with
cements. It focuses largely on the use of high
resolution isothermal calorimetry to investigate
the impact of admixtures on cement sulphate
consumption, and how the use of different
admixtures can affect the sulphate level needed
for proper admixture response. Several examples
are given and the employment of the calorimetric
technique explained.
KEYWORDSCalorimetry, Portland cement, Cement, Sulfate,
Sulphate, Isothermal, Hydration, Retardation,
Slump loss, Dispersion, Setting time, Silicate,
Aluminate, C3S, C3A, C4AF.
INTRODUCTIONIn recent years the performance possibilities of
concrete have been greatly widened by the
application of chemical admixtures. Degrees of
placeability, set control, strength development
and durability have been achieved which would
have been impossible without the employment of
admixtures. Nevertheless, there are continually
reported instances in which concrete has not
performed as desired, which can many time be
traced to undesirable interaction between the
admixture chemicals and the cementitious system
employed. No admixture can be expected to work
regardless of the cement composition, just as no
cement can be expected to work with all
admixtures, under all conditions. The key is to
understand the factors that influence the
interaction of admixtures with cements, and take
steps to avoid problems.
In 1995 the present author gave an overview
paper to the Institute of Concrete Technology,
summarizing a number of the principles and
procedures involved in understanding cement
admixture interactions. It is the intent of this
paper to present some of the new techniques
used in resolving such issues, and to discuss a
few recent examples, in the hope that the
information will be useful in avoiding some of
these problems, or at least in resolving them
more quickly. It is not the intent to be exhaustive
by any means, as the subject in its entirety is too
complex for the available space.
Chief among the techniques found useful is
high resolution isothermal calorimetry, which has
been made possible through recent improvements
in equipment sensitivity and convenience. This
allows tracking of the cement sulphate phase
consumption to a degree not previously possible,
without the effort of complex extraction and
chemical analysis, and allows us to demonstrate
that sulphate consumption can be much more
rapid that thought previously, especially in certain
highly dispersed systems.
Due to the author's location in the United
States, the majority of the cements conformed to
the ASTM standards not EN, and are therefore
unmodified Portland cements.
BACKGROUNDThe reader is referred to the previously
mentioned paper[1] and to several others [3-5] for
detailed background to the issue. We will briefly
summarize some key points. Proper setting and
strength development in cements depends on
having the right amount of cement sulphate to
control the aluminate phase reactions in the
cement. Figure 1 summarizes the situation.
RECENT ADVANCES IN UNDERSTANDING OF CEMENT
ADMIXTURE INTERACTIONS
Lawrence R. Roberts, BSc, MSc
W. R. Grace & Co., USA
54
Calcium aluminate compounds are capable of
reacting very quickly with water and in the
absence of sulphate can cause such a significant
exotherm that a cement paste patty can be seen
to steam within a few minutes. Sulphate is added
to control this, and the calcium sulphoaluminate
reaction products deposit on the aluminate
surface and slow down reactions. The required
amount of cement sulphate is influenced by the
factors shown. If the aluminate is not adequately
controlled, then rapid loss of slump and poor or
even non-existent strength gain may ensue, due
to the aluminate hydration products occluding
the surface of the calcium silicates and restricting
their access to water.
Factors Controlling AluminateActivity
The more active the aluminate phases are,
considering C3A and C4AF together, the more
sulphate will need to be supplied. C3A being
more reactive than C4AF, higher C3A cements
generally will require more sulphate. We will see
later that dispersion can affect this relationship.
The finer the cement, the more aluminate surface
area is available, and more sulphate is needed.
If dispersing admixtures are used, more
effective surface area becomes available, and
greater levels of sulphate may be needed. Figure
2 illustrates this effect of dispersants.
Alkali modification of the aluminate phase
occurs when there is not enough sulphate in the
clinkering process to keep the alkali in the alkali
sulphate form. The alkali modified C3A changes
crystal habit from cubic to orthorhombic,
increasing significantly in reactivity, requiring
more sulphate, faster.
Finally, supplementary cementitious materials
such as sub-bituminous coal fly ash or higher
aluminate slags can increase the available
aluminates, requiring higher sulphate availability.
Factors Controlling SulphateAvailability
The sulphate availability is first affected by the
amount added. It should be understood that the
amount found on a certificate of analysis reflects
the total sulphate, both present in the clinker and
added in milling. The clinker sulphate may be
readily available, if in the alkali sulphate phase, or
if alkalis are low, combined into the clinker
minerals, in which case much of the sulphate will
not be available during the early reactions critical
to slump loss and setting.
The hydration state of the sulphate is critical.
The most common form added to cement mills is
natural rock gypsum, although a number of
waste gypsums are increasingly being used. In
hot mills, gypsum dehydrates to plaster, which
dissolves faster than gypsum and thus is preferred
if a rapidly hydrating aluminate must be
controlled. In the case to too much plaster
formation, false set may occur as plaster reacts
Figure 1: Cement sulphate balanceprinciples
Figure 2: Effect of dispersants on sulphate demand
55
with mix water to re-form gypsum crystals, which
stiffen the mix. Usually however, the cement
aluminates react quickly enough to consume the
sulphate, and no false set occurs. In the case
where false set is a concern, or sometimes for
cost reasons, natural anhydrite may be used to
supplement the gypsum. This goes into solution
much more slowly and does not support false set.
Due to its slow dissolution, it may not be able to
control rapidly hydrating aluminates, but can be
ideal for slowly hydrating aluminates. A
complicating factor is that admixtures tend to
sorb out on anhydrite surfaces, further slowing its
dissolution. This can induce aluminate control
problems.
Finally, alkali sulphates, which form during
clinkering, can be a rapid source of sulphate
providing good aluminate control. As kiln fuels
change the alkali sulphate content can vary,
leading to potential variation in aluminate control
and admixture response.[6,7]
Figure 3, below, summarizes the overall
sulphate balance issues, without dealing with the
impact of admixtures. We will use the examples
to discuss the effect of admixtures.
Isothermal ConductionCalorimetry
The isothermal conduction calorimeter had
been used in cement research for more than half
a century. Lerch's ground -breaking work[4],
published in 1946, demonstrated its utility and
showed that calorimetry can define properly
sulphated cements. Researchers have used a
variety of equipment ever since, but most units
have suffered from electric and mechanical
problems, with resultant lack of productivity,
sensitivity and reproducibility. Sensitivity was a
special problem with low aluminate content
(sulphate resisting) cements, as the lower
reactivity of these cements gave poorer signal to
noise ratios. Recently, however equipment has
become available [8] which increases the
convenience and improves the precision of the
results. Figure 4 illustrates both the general form
of the output of isothermal calorimetry and the
particular sensitivity and reproducibility of the
equipment. Heat flow is graphed on the y axis
against time on the x axis, giving a fingerprint of
the hydration behaviour.
In this equipment cement paste may be mixed
either inside or outside the cell. Our experience is
that the higher energy of outside mixing is
needed to replicate the agitation of concrete
mixing. In at least one case, field concrete
problems were reproduced by outside mixing,
where companion tests (in another laboratory)
did not demonstrate the problem when the water
plus admixture was simply injected into the cell
containing the cement. When the other
laboratory repeated the work by outside mixing,
the problem was reproduced.
After initial mixing, a rapid exotherm occurs
which comprises both initial heat of wetting and
direct aluminate phase reaction with water. This
is shown by the initial descending curve. Then a
dormant period ensues, due to coverage of the
reacting cement grains largely by the reaction
products of the sulphate with the aluminate
phases. After a while the reaction of the calcium
silicates (C3S) begins, which is responsible for true
set and strength development. The area under
this curve is roughly proportional to the early
strength, as it reflects the heat output from the
reaction, and is thus a measure of the total
reaction. At some point during the hydration,
the sulphate used to react with the aluminates is
depleted by that reaction, and a second reaction
begins. There is some disagreement where this is
all conversion of the original reaction product, the
Figure 3: Overall sulphate balance
Figure 4: High Resolution IsothermalCalorimetry showing subtle sulphatedepletion peak and excellentreproducibility
56
trisulphate form known as AFt or more commonly
ettringite, to the monosulphate form designated
AFm, of if it is direct reaction of the aluminates
with water. For convenience then we simply
designate this the "sulphate depletion reaction".
It is characteristically less distinct, the greater the
iron content of the cement. It is in these cements
that the new calorimetry technology allows us to
see the depletion peak, whereas in earlier work
that was frequently not visible.
When this peak shows up, as it does here in
Figure 4, well after the silicate peak maximum,
cements generally have few response issues to
admixtures. However, when cements have less
sulphate and it is depleted earlier, as shown in
Figure 5, we may see problems when admixtures
are used which increase the demand for sulphate
further. We must emphasise that this cement by
itself is perfectly balanced and meets
specifications, but may not respond to admixtures
as well as one with more sulphate.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Excessive admixturedose resulting in sensitivity tominor cement changes
In 2002 a bridge deck placement resulted in
concrete which did not set. This occurred despite
temperatures approaching 35ºC. On investigation
it was found that the concrete producer had
been using a combination of admixtures, both
plasticisers. One, a so-called "mid-range water
reducer" (MRWR) in U. S. parlance, had little
impact on set. The other, a conventional "water
reducer" or plasticiser, was a moderately strong
retarder.
The producer was experienced in using them
in combination, with the mid range water reducer
at a fixed dose, the other at variable dose to
adjust for temperature. On the day in question
reported slump loss at the site cause the producer
to increase the plasticiser dose, expecting to
lengthen set. Instead he got rapid slump loss, but
the concrete put in place with difficulty failed to
set and required removal. The doses in question
were approximately 550 ml/100 kg of the MRWR,
and 250 ml/100 kg of the plasticiser. The standard
dose of the plasticiser was 125 ml/100 kg.
Numerous samples of cement were received
and investigated both by calorimetry and
chemical analysis. It was found that the cement
had been reduced in sulphate content by
approximately 0.5% compared to recent
shipments which had worked well. Yet of all the
samples encountered, only the sample from that
day failed to set. See Figure 6. Note that the
problem cement sample had a much higher initial
exotherm, indicating higher aluminate reaction,
than did the other samples from the same plant,
or the two alternate cements. It then failed to
show any silicate reaction over the test interval.
This behaviour is characteristic of this kind of
problem - when the sulphate is too low is seems
frequently to act as a switch, and the hydration is
entirely shut off, not mere delayed a few hours.
On further investigation in to the chemistry of
the various samples, it was found that the sample
which failed to set normally had a soluble alkali
content of 0.54% as Na2O, whereas similar
samples which hydrated normally with the high
admixture doses had soluble alkali of 0.62 to
0.70 percent. No other significant differences
could be found.
It would appear then that the high admixture
doses, in combination with a reduced sulphate
level, put this cement in the very edge of
performance problems, so that a very small
difference in the rapidly available alkali sulphate
was enough to make a critical difference. This
was confirmed by the addition of extra sulphate,
in the form of plaster, to the isothermal
calorimeter mixes. As seen in Figure 7, this
addition eliminated the problems in setting
Figure 5: Early sulphate depletion peaks
Figure 6: Lack of set and strengthdevelopment with one cement sampleand 550 ml/100 kg of the MRWR, and250 ml/100 kg of plasticiser.
57
Example 2: Acceleration problemswith alkali-modified C3A
Our second example covers a cement which
was found to have variable response to non
chloride accelerators. In the extreme case, the
accelerators would cause several hours
retardation. We investigated the problem using
both isothermal calorimetry and quantitative x-ray
diffraction. The results showed that variations in
the degree of alkali modification of the cement
were causing the extremes of variation, and while
extra sulphate helped, the real solution was
control of the alkali content in the aluminate
phase of the cement.
Figure 7 summarizes the problem. This is most
extreme cement sample, and it can be seen that
while the cement hydrates normally by itself at
23ºC, giving a C3S peak maximum at about 8
hours, addition of the non chloride accelerator
causes numerous early hydration peaks of
unknown composition, followed by a delayed C3S
peak with a maximum at about 18 hours.
Addition of various levels of sulphate as plaster
improved the situation, but even at 1.14%, while
there was greater reaction as shown by the
increased area under the curve, there was no
acceleration of the C3S peak maximum. Note in
all these cases the very
high early aluminate
hydration peak.
Since sulphate addition
did not completely restore
performance, the cement
samples were further
investigated by
quantitative x-ray
diffraction. Alkali-modified
orthorhombic C3A shows
distinctly under x-ray
diffraction and we were
able to pick out three
cements at low, medium
and high levels of orthorhombic C3A. The cement
in Figure 7 was the highest level. We then tested
the early cement exotherm in duplicate, with the
results shown in Figure 8. Note that the time
scale in this chart is greatly expanded, with the
maximum time being 6 hour. The initial
exotherm is greater the greater is the proportion
of orthorhombic C3A.
Problems of this type typically relate to
variation in the sulphate level of the fuel used to
burn the clinker. When the fuel becomes low in
sulphate, alkali is forced into the aluminate
phase. In this case discussion with the technical
staff of the cement company resulted in more
predictable performance.
Example 3: Setting problemswith very low C3A cementassociated with dispersion
Our final example covers another case of
extended set. A large placement of concrete
containing both a polycarboxylate superplasticiser
and a corrosion inhibitor failed to set. The
cement, an ASTM Type V (highly sulphate
resisting) had a nominal 3% C3A content, but
quantitative x-ray diffraction indicated it was near
zero. Thus essentially all the aluminate in the
Figure 7: Normal set and strength development restored at550 ml/100 kg of the MRWR, and 250 ml/100 kg of plasticiser,0.5% SO3 as plaster added to mix water in all samples.
Figure 8: Lack of accelerationperformance of a non-chloride acceleratorin conjunction with a plasticiser, withimprovement by sulphate addition.
Figure 9: Initial exotherms of threecements at different levels of alkali-modified (orthorhombic) C3A
58
cement was in the C4AF or ferrite form. The
sulphate content was 1.8%, a normal amount for
such a low aluminate clinker, but analysis for the
gypsum phases indicated only 0.7% was present
as gypsum, plaster, anhydrite or syngenite. Thus
more than half of the sulphate was locked in the
cement clinker phases, and unavailable in the
early stages of hydration.
Figure 10 summarises the hydration behaviour.
This is a different representation of the
calorimetry output, with the left showing the
hydration to half an hour, the right showing the
hydration to 20 hours. The cement alone
hydrates normally, but the combination of the
polycarboxylate superplasticizer and corrosion
inhibitor in the mix water give a much larger
initial exotherm. Subsequent silicate reaction is
completely suppressed and the curve follows the
baseline out to 20 hours. Interestingly, when
both admixtures are delayed by one minute, the
initial exotherm is significantly reduced, and
normal silicate hydration is achieved.
Figure 11 shows the impact of adding
sulphate. The curves indicated as cement only
contain only the cement, while the others contain
the mixture of admixtures, added in the mix
water, and various levels of added sulphate as
plaster. These are 0, 0.13%, 0.5%, 0.75%, and
1%. When significant amounts of extra sulphate
are added, normal setting behaviour is restored,
even though the early exotherm is not reduced.
0.13% does not help, and 0.5% helps only
marginally. This indicates that the character of the
reaction products must be modified by the
sulphate.
Close inspection of the plain cement shows
the sulphate depletion to occur at about 7 hours,
confirmed by expanding the chart for multiple
replicates of the plain cement. See Figure 12. Yet
inspecting the admixtured sample's early peak
shows a slight inflection on the 0% sulphate
curve starting at about _ hour, while the addition
of only 0.13% SO3 moves this out to about 0.35
hours, confirming it is the sulphate depletion
Figure 10. Initial and 20 hour calorimeter curves of problem system showing positiveimpact of one minute delay in addition
Figure 11: Initial and 20 hour calorimeter curves of problem system with addedsulphate at various levels, showing change in sulphate depletion time andrestoration of silicate hydration
59
peak. 0.5% SO3, which is beginning to achieve
silicate hydration, moves the depletion peak to
about 0.6 hours. Thus close inspection of the
curves easily shows the progressive increase in
time to depletion by addition of sulphate.
So what is causing this problem and why do
either delaying the addition or adding sulphate
solve the problem? The answer is complex and
still somewhat conjectural, so we will deal with it
as bullet points for clarity:
• The cement is low on sulphate, with
depletion occurring before the peak of the
silicate reaction
• The cement has lots of ultrafines (10% less
than 1 micrometre) which will be rich in
ferrite phase.
• Without admixtures these will be clumped
together, and have insufficient surface to
coat all the silicate phases.
• On initital hydration these will release iron
hydroxides which will glue the clumps
together more strongly.
• Thus hydration is normal.
• When the admixtures are present in the mix
water, the ferrite particles are strongly
dispersed and coat the silicates. When the
iron hydroxides are released, they further
coat the silicates. The corrosion inhibitor
strengthens the hydroxide barrier, preventing
water from getting to the silicate
• When the admixtures are delayed, the
clumps which form are strongly enough
glued together that they don't disperse as
well, and the coating of the silicates in not
enough to prevent hydration.
• When extra sulphate is added, some of the
iron is found as the iron sulphates which are
not stabilized by the corrosion inhibitor, and
this the barrier can be attacked by the water
and the silicates hydrate normally.
Work too extensive to report in detail showed
these effects to be dosage sensitive to both
admixtures, and that the critical product to be
delayed is the polycarboxylate superplasticiser. It
is important to note that this work showed that
the ferrite phase of a very low C3A cement was
capable of consuming the sulphate in about 15
minutes. Thus care must be taken with these
kinds of cements when strong dispersion is
achieved through the powerful newer
polycarboxylate admixtures.
CONCLUSIONSHigh resolution isothermal calorimetry is the a
very effective tool for understanding the
behaviour of cement in the presence of
admixtures. It is simple to run and requires no
expensive chemical analysis to get useful data.
Sulphate control of aluminate phase hydration
frequently is key to effective admixture
performance.
Excessive admixture dosage can exacerbate
cement-admixture problems and should be
avoided. If higher doses of plasticiser or
superplasticiser seem to be needed, review of mix
components for their natural water demand is in
order as likely something has changed.
Reaction in the first few minutes can strongly
influence the hydration behaviour.
High levels of dispersion can influence the rate
of C4AF consumption strongly.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to express his
appreciation to his colleague Paul Sandberg, PhD,
who developed much of the data shown here,
and to W. R. Grace & Co. for permission to
publish.
FURTHER READING
1. ROBERTS, L. R., Dealing with Cement -Admixture Interactions, Institute ofConcrete Technology Yearbook 1995-1996
2. DODSON, V. H. and HAYDEN, T. D., AnotherLook at the Portland Cement/ChemicalAdmixture Incompatibility Problem, Cement,Concrete, and Aggregates, CCAGDP, Vol.11, No. 1, p. 52-56
Figure 12: Sulphate depletion peaks ofmultiple tests on the plain cement
60
3. SANDBERG, P. and ROBERTS, L., Studies ofCement-Admixture Interactions Related toAluminate Hydration Control by IsothermalCalorimetry, ACI Special Publication SP-217,2003, p. 529-542.
4. LERCH, W., The influence of gypsum on thehydration and properties of portlandcement pastes, Proceedings,1946, Vol. 46,of the American Society for TestingMaterials
5. JIANG, S., KIM, B.G. and AITCIN, P.-C.,Importance of Adequate Soluble AlkaliContent to Ensure Cement/SuperplasticizerCompatibility. Cement and ConcreteResearch, 1999, Vol. 29, p. 71-78.
6. POLLITT, H. W. W. and BROWN, A.W., Thedistribution of alkalies in portland cementclinker”, 1968, Proceedings of the 5th Int.Symp. On the Chemistry of Cement, Tokyo.
7. ODLER, I. And WONNEMANN, R., Effect ofAlkalies on Portland Cement Hydration, I.Alkali Oxides Incorporated into theCrystalline Lattice of Clinker Minerals,Cement and Concrete Research,1983, Vol.13, p. 477-482
8. WADSÖ, L., et al., The isothermal heatconduction calorimeter: a versatileinstrument for studying processes inphysics, chemistry and biology, 2001, J. Chem. Educ. 78 p. 1080-1086
61
Andy Rogers joined the
concrete industry in 1984 and
has moved from Area Technical
Supervisor in North Wales for
RMC to QA/QC Engineer for
major civils contracts in Qatar,
to Area Technical Manager in North Wales for
RMC covering Cheshire, Merseyside, Lancashire
and North Wales. He is currently working in Libya
as Contract Co-ordinator where he is in charge of
the assessment and review of contract quality and
works procedures, technical and materials
specifications.
ABSTRACTThis paper describes the production of 1900
km of large diameter prestressed concrete pipes
and their installation on the Great Man Made
River Project, to transport water from desert
aquifers to fertile coastal areas.
KEYWORDSConcrete pipes, Prestressing, Design, Sprayed
concrete, Plant, Admixtures, Superplasticisers.
INTRODUCTIONGlobal warming is a fact. Predictive modelling
indicates that arid regions will become drier and
that wetter regions will receive more rain; overall
precipitation will increase. For example, the flow
of the Yukon River in Canada is expected to
increase by over 40% but those of the Nile and
Mekong Rivers will diminish by over 20%.
Growing populations in the areas short of
water have compounded the problem as
discussed at the 3rd World Water Forum in March
2003 (see Appendix 1) where the global situation
was summarised as:
• 1.2 billion people in developing countries
lacked access to safe drinking water
• 2.4 billion people were without adequate
sanitation
• 4 million children were dying each year from
water-related diseases.
As reported in New Scientist articles “Running
on Empty” (21st August 2004 edition) and
“Asian Farmers Suck the Continent Dry” (28th
August 2004 edition) the short-term solution of
drilling local wells is depleting groundwater
stocks, which is unsurprising as an Olympic-sized
swimming pool would irrigate enough crops to
feed only one person for a year.
The anticipated widening gap between the
haves and the have-nots of water supplies
presents a problem that spans international
frontiers. The solutions are necessarily of similar
proportions.
The Great Man-made River Project (GMRP) in
Libya, North Africa, is a case study for the
problems associated with such an undertaking.
Geographical scaleThe pipelines planned are shown in Figure 1.
The project intends to tap underground
reservoirs of water, or aquifers, situated under the
north-east corner of the Sahara desert in Libya
and transport it to the coastal regions where the
soil is fertile and the population is concentrated.
Although the population of Libya is under 6
million, the land area of the country is over seven
times greater than that of the United Kingdom.
To put the scale of the project in perspective,
1900 kilometres of pipeline are required;
equivalent to laying a line from Scotland to
Northern Italy via Belgium, Holland, Germany,
France and Switzerland.
The water reserves are contained in four large
aquifers and two smaller ones in the north of the
country. The four larger ones (Murzug, Kufra,
Sarir and Hamad) are shown in Figure 2 and
THE GREAT MAN-MADE RIVER PROJECT, LIBYA
Andy Rogers, MICT
Price Brothers (UK) Ltd
Figure 1: Pipeline network
62
contain a volume of water estimated at over 120
billion cubic metres.
The flow rate anticipated once all the pipes are
in full production is greater than that of the River
Thames.
Construction scaleThe project has been split into three phases;
the cost of each is shown in Table 1.
The infrastructure items included in the
costs are
• Roads
• Power Stations
• Production Plants
• Wells and Pipelines
• Pumping Stations
• Reservoirs
• Distribution Lines
• Operation and Maintenance Facilities.
Although none of these items are of
extraordinary construction, the size of every facet
of the project throws up amazing statistics. For
example, the reservoirs’ capacities are shown
below:
The concrete required could construct a path
to the moon.
The prestressing wire needed could encircle
the earth over 280 times.
The transporters for the pipes would travel a
total distance that reaches the sun and back!!
The logistics are quite literally astronomical!
Why use prestressed concretecylinder pipe (PCCP)?
A comparison of the relative benefits of pipe
materials is given in Appendix 2. Alternative
materials to cement and aggregates were not
readily available in Libya; pipes other than
concrete would be imported as a finished article
resulting in little of the expenditure benefiting the
country.
Figure 2: Main aquifer locations
Main Contract Daily Water CostAward Date Production, m3 US $ Billion
Phase I 1983 2,000,000 5.53
Phase II 1990 2,500,000 8.05
Phase III 1999 1,680,000 6.00
TOTALS 8,180,000 19.58
Table 1: Project cost
Figure 3: Pipe being lifted into trench
Reservoir Capacity M m3
Ajdabiya Holding 4.0
Al Gardabiya 6.8
Omar Mukhtar 4.7
Al Khadra 24.0
63
Fabricating locally, where possible, gives a
boost to economies by providing employment
and a market for materials and services; there are
also opportunities created to expand the local
workforce skills base. Four m diameter pipes
were required for the volumes of water
envisaged; this diameter requires a high degree of
stiffness from the pipe wall.
Pipe design principles are detailed in the
American Water Works Association C304 (latest
edition is C304-99) “Design of Prestressed
Concrete Cylinder Pipe” and roughly follow the
considerations taken for arch spans. Thus, for
small diameters, steel and plastic piping give
adequate stiffness with reasonable economy. As
stiffness is a cubic function of thickness, the pipe
walls for large pipes are necessarily thick.
Concrete is a value-for-money bulk stiffness
provider and for an extended design life,
particularly where water exposure is concerned,
this is a construction material which improves
with age.
The design life also means that operation and
maintenance costs become more significant.
Figure 4 shows an extract from a report
performed by Wisconsin Municipal Engineers and
clearly demonstrates the value of PCCP in
accordance with AWWA C301 “Prestressed
Concrete Pressure Pipe, Steel Cylinder Type”.
Technically and economically, PCCP was the
choice for the Great Man Made River Project.
PCCP for the projectMain supply pipes are 7.52 m long with an
inside diameter of 4 m.
Each finished pipe weighs 75 tonnes using
approximately 26m3 of concrete and up to 18
kilometres of high-carbon steel prestressing wire.
A cross section of the pipe is shown in Figure 6.
Figure 4: Pipe operation and maintenance costs
Figure 5: Pipe profile
Figure 6: Pipe Cross Section
64
The concrete is used to encase a thin-walled
steel cylinder which provides the water-
tightness. The joints rings for the steel cylinder
are welded to give a spigot and bell at each
end (see Figure 8)
Resistance to tensile forces imposed on the
concrete caused by internal pressures, self-
weight and earth loads is provided by placing
the concrete in permanent compression by
wrapping the concrete core in steel wire at a
specified pitch and tension.
The remaining operations do not contribute
to the structural performance but provide
protection to the wire. These involve a thin
coating of bonded mortar followed by the
application of a waterproof membrane; the
preferred membrane for the project is coal-tar
epoxy resin. Each operation in itself is fairly simple
and can be represented schematically as shown in
Figure 7; however, the outputs required and the
size of each pipe once again required outsize
plant.
Plant OperationsOver 500,000 pipes were required at rates of
up to one per production line every 15 minutes;
five production lines were needed, each 2.5
kilometres long and one kilometre wide (see
Figure 9).
The manufacturing plants were designed and
constructed by Price Brothers and were
commissioned in 1986. They are still fully
operational.
Technical Difficulties withConcrete and Mortar
From sourcing of sufficient materials to the
magnified consequences of quality control
problems, the project scale presents several
challenges to a concrete technologist.
Brega plant benefits from a huge limestone
Figure 8: Bell and spigot joint
Figure 7: Schematic representation ofPCCP manufacturing process
Figure 9: Aerial photograph of Sarir PCCPmanufacturing plant
65
deposit. The view from ground level in Sarir (see
figure 10), however, gives no clue where to find
aggregates in the desert….
……. but a satellite picture tells a different
story (see Figure 11).
The ancient river courses were revealed which
then allowed the focussing of a ground-
penetrating radar (GPR) survey.
GPR is affected by moisture variations in the
ground. Desert conditions were perfect for a fast,
accurate survey.
The deposits proved to be in thin beds
requiring a highly mobile set-up. With a coarse
aggregate recovery rate expected at 5% - 7% the
raw material needed separating in situ to be
economical.
Four track-mounted, mobile screening units
were custom made (see Figure 12) and could be
remotely operated.
Bulldozers ramp up the desert from a depth of
approximately 2m and front loaders then feed the
mobile screening plant (see Figure 13). All
aggregate over 3mm discharges directly into 40
tonne dumpers.
The aggregate proved to be predominantly
rounded 3-10mm (using ASTM terminology,
which was the basis for the concrete
specification).
The specified characteristic cylinder
compressive strength of 42 MPa (equivalent to a
cube strength of 54 N/mm2) as defined in AWWA
C301 was achievable. Some pipe designs,
however, required 48 MPa concrete which was
unattainable without very high cement contents
(which caused excessive shrinkage, heat of
hydration and creep) due to the ceiling strength
associated with the round aggregate. The
solution lay in separately processing oversized
material and using the crushed aggregate to
improve bond strengths.
Efforts to improve strength without increasing
cement contents led to research into the
performance of new superplasticisers; modified
polycarboxylate ethers in lieu of melamine-based
admixtures (Melment products) showed
significant improvements in compressive strengths
at constant free water/cement ratio 0.35 (see
Figure 14).
Figure 10: Ground level view of Sarir
Figure 11: Satellite photograph
Figure 12: One of four mobileaggregate screening plants
Figure 13: Mobile screening plant inoperation
Figure 14: Admixtures - primary lab trials
66
Use of PFA was examined, particularly for its
effect on in situ strength at elevated temperature.
Later age strength gains shown by cylinders were
reflected in situ despite pipe storage conditions
which encouraged desiccation.
Variable C3A contents in cement supplies
coupled with inconsistent admixture addition and
mixing times gave variable bleed characteristics.
The lift rate of 7.5 m in 15 minutes with heavy
external vibration gave rise to extensive sand
streaking (see Figure 15). This sand streaking is
known to be reflected at the concrete/steel
cylinder interfaces although it is not visible. With
the removal of the cement by this scouring
passivation of the steel cylinder is not assured.
The pipes are not acceptable in this condition (see
Figure 16).
The avoidance of sand-streaking was achieved
through more robust mix design with increased
cohesion and lower slump but more importantly
by educating and training site personnel.
Although the inner and outer concrete pipe
walls were only 75 mm and 175 mm thick
respectively, in situ temperature rises were
significant. This was due to the inner pipe
annulus being sealed by the top and bottom
pallets to effectively provide insulation against
heat loss. This became a problem when
demoulding at night or in the cooler months.
The effects were mitigated by
• Depressing the initial concrete temperature
by using ice
• Use of mist curing
• Use of thermocouples to monitor in situ,
kiln and ambient temperatures
• Careful timing of kiln opening and
demoulding.
Occasionally, water spraying malfunctions
would give localised rapid cooling leading to
thermal cracking (see Figure 17).
Other developments researched and
implemented to improve the pipe manufacturing
process include incorporating styrene butadiene
latex in sprayed mortar to increase consolidation
and reduce absorption, and the pre-coating of
pre-stressing wire with sodium nitrite-based
corrosion inhibitor.
Many opportunities have been taken to
examine the wealth of information generated byFigure 16: No remedy for extensivesand-streaking
Figure 15: Sand-streaked pipes
Age Cylinder Core Core/Cylinder (%)
28-Days 60.5 MPa 53.7 MPa 88.8
56-Days 66.5 MPa 57.3 MPa 86.2
Figure 17: Thermal cracks cause bylocalised cooling water spray (Note thecalcium carbonate deposit caused by thereaction between water-bornecarbonates and the lime leached fromthe concrete).
67
such a large project. This information, in the
hands of experienced concrete technologists, has
led to constantly reducing reject rates, savings on
material costs and an improved final product.
It remains to be seen if or when more water
re-distribution schemes on the same scale as the
Great Man-Made River Project will be necessary. If
they are, it would make sense to take note of the
lessons learned in Libya.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to express his
appreciation to his colleague Paul Sandberg, PhD,
who developed much of the data shown here,
and to W. R. Grace & Co. for permission to
publish.
Acknowledgement is given to Ken McGinley,
Brown and Root North Africa, for many of the
facts and illustrations.
APPENDIX 1
Extract from India’s Address
Global:a) 1.2 billion people in developing countries
lacked access to safe drinking water.
b) 2.4 billion people are without adequate
sanitation.
c) 4 million children died each year from
water-related diseases.
National:a) In India, 125 million people lack access to
safe drinking water
b) In India, 700 million people lack access to
sanitation facilities & defecate in open.
c) In India, 1 million children lose their lives
to diarrhoea every year
d) India is one among the developing
countries facing serious drinking water
problems. It was reported that a major
freshwater crisis is gradually unfolding in
India as a result of inadequate water
management and environmental
degradation by human action.
1. Actionsa) “WASH Campaign” in South India is
launched by Centre for Community Health
Research
(CCHR). The objective is to raise
consciousness about sanitation and
hygiene, gain the commitment of political,
social and opinion leaders and ultimately,
bring about the structural and behavioural
changes that will provide a permanent
solution to this preventable international
crisis.
b) Rainwater Harvesting.
c) Water Quality Control (WQC) and Water
Quality Surveillance (WQS) programme.
2. CommitmentsIt is the duty of every body to work together,
in order to attain the goal. Global, National and
local stakeholders should co-operate with
participatory approach.
3. Recommendations1) Access,
2) Finance,
3) Participatory,
4) More concern to the “poorest of the
poor”.
68
PCCP56 years of use in the US and Canada, 32,000 km in service
Supplies 90 out of North America’s 100 largest metropolitan areas
200 million people in North America depend on PCCP
All pipelines supplied by Price Brothers since 1943 are still in service.
ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES OF DIFFERENT MATERIALS FOR PIPE CONSTRUCTION
APPENDIX 2
Advantages
Ductile Iron
• Good corrosion resistancewhen coated
• High strength
Concrete
• Good corrosion resistance
• Widespread availability
• High strength
• Good load supporting capacity
Vitrified Clay
• Very resistant to acids and most chemicals
• Strong
Thermoplastics (PVC, PE, HDPE, ABS)
• Very lightweight
• Easy to install
• Economical
• Good corrosion resistance
• Smooth surface reduces friction losses
• Long pipe sections reduce infiltrationpotential
• Flexible
Thermosets (FRP)
• High strength
• Lightweight
• Corrosion resistant
Disadvantages
• Heavy
• Requires careful installation to avoid cracking
• Heavy
• Susceptible to attack by H2S and acids whenpipes are not coated
• Joints are susceptible to chemical attack
• Brittle (may crack); requires carefulinstallation
• Short length and numerous joints make itprone to infiltration and more costly to install
• Susceptible to chemical attack, particularly bysolvents
• Strength affected by sunlight (UV protection)
• Requires special bedding
• High material cost
• Brittle, requires careful installation
• High installation cost
6969
Dr. Mouloud Behloul is a
structural and materials
engineer and has been involved
since 1994 in the study and
engineering of ultra-high
performance fibre reinforced
concrete. He was Project Manager of several R&D
projects and Project Manager for the construction
of structures. Currently, he is Technical Director,
Ductal®. for the Lafarge Group, in Paris, France
. ABSTRACT
Ductal®, a new material technology developed
over the last decade, is a combination of superior
technical characteristics of strength, ductility and
durability, whilst providing high quality surface
aspect on mouldable products.
This technology offers flexural resistance
exceeding 40 MPa with ductility and compression
strength beyond 200 MPa. As a result of its
tensile strength and ductility it is possible to avoid
reinforcement bars in structural elements.
Ductal® covers a range of formulations that
can be adapted to meet specific demands of
different customer segments, enhancing the
usage value and contributing to the overall
construction performance, reducing labour
requirement, enhancing durability, lowering
maintenance need and increasing total life cycle.
Ductal®’s unique combination of superior
properties enables designers to create thinner
sections, longer spans and higher structures that
are lighter, innovative in geometry and form,
while providing superior durability and
impermeability against corrosion, abrasion and
impact.
A number of reference prototypes in Ductal®
already exist in different countries both in
structural and architectural segments. A number
of selected references such as the recent
footbridges, retrofitting elements and
architectural realisations will be illustrated in this
article. Currently there are many other innovative
applications of this material in projects at
different stages of development.
KEYWORDS:Ultrahigh performance concrete, Ductility, Self-
placing concrete, Applications, Ductal®.
INTRODUCTIONDuctal®, the outcome of the research over the
last 10 years in the area of concrete, is a new
construction material technology belonging to
the UHPFRC family, with very high durability,
compressive strength, flexural resistance with
ductility and aesthetics.
The Ductal® technology was developed by the
combined efforts of three companies, Lafarge,
the construction materials manufacturer,
Bouygues, contractor in civil and structural
engineering and Rhodia, chemical materials
manufacturer. With this joint effort through
intensive research and development, a material
product range was patented, industrialised and
commercialised [1].
There were more than 15 universities and 6
testing laboratories in different disciplines and
countries which participated in the important
research effort over several years.
In France, new recommendations for the
design of structures and elements made of
ultrahigh strength concretes reinforced with fibres
were issued in May 2002 [2]. These
recommendations were established by a BFUP
working group (Béton Fibré Ultra Performant)
coordinated by SETRA (Road and traffic
governmental agency) and with representatives
from the construction industry (contractors,
control agencies, suppliers, certification
authorities).
Through the development period, several
prototypes were manufactured, prior to extensive
use in various civil works, structural and
architectural applications.
Ductal® TECHNOLOGY: THE RESULT OF A DECADE OF RESEARCH
Ductal® refers to a simple concept, minimising
the number of defects such as micro-cracks and
pore spaces, that allow achievement of a greater
Ductal®: ULTRA-HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
FOR A WIDE RANGE OF APPLICATIONS
Dr. Mouloud Behloul
Lafarge Group, France
7070
percentage of the potential ultimate load carrying
capacity defined by its components and provide
enhanced durability properties. To apply that
concept, a concrete was proportioned with
particle sizes ranging from a maximum of
approximately 600 µm, down to less than 0.1 µm
to obtain a very dense mixture which minimized
void spaces in the concrete.
A Ductal® research program was conducted
based on the following principles:
• enhancement of homogeneity by elimination
of coarse aggregate
• enhancement of density by optimization of
the granular mixture
• enhancement of the microstructure by post-
set heat-treatment
• enhancement of ductility by incorporating
adequate size fibres
• maintaining mixing and casting procedures
as close as possible to existing practice.
By applying the first three principles, it was
possible to define a concrete with very high
compressive strength, but with not enough
ductility compared to a conventional mortar. The
inclusion of adequate fibres improves drastically
the tensile strength and provides a substantial
level of ductility.
The various Ductal® formulations are all based
on an optimised composition combining
homogeneity and granular compacted density.
To enhance performances, especially
mechanical ones, the option of heat treatment
can be chosen. For each application according to
technical and economical challenges, the Ductal®
technology is adjusted to achieve the most
adapted product to the customer’s requirements.
As described above, Ductal® is an Ultra High
Performance Concrete reinforced with fibres.
These fibres can be made of steel (Ductal®-FM),
made of organic material (Ductal®-FO) or a
combination of both steel and organic material
(Ductal®-AF).
The fresh mix of all these ranges of materials
have very useful properties in term of fluidity and
self placing. Most of the standard industrial
batching facilities are able to mix Ductal® with
only minor adjustments.
The Ductal® matrix is very fine and dense and
shows outstanding capacity to replicate any kind
of surface textures. By using adequate pigments a
very wide range of colouring effects can be
achieved. Thanks to these properties, Ductal® is a
favoured material for architectural applications
where combining high mechanical properties with
outstanding aesthetics for a castable mineral-
based material.
In the case of lower mechanical requirement
the steel fibres can be replaced by fewer organic
fibres and heat treatment may not be required.
This range of material is named Ductal®-FO.
Mechanical Properties andAnalysis
Ductal®-FM, the first developed mix, is
designed for structural applications where high
bending and direct tensile strengths are required.
These mechanical properties are achieved by
using short steel fibres. A content of 2% by
volume of 13-15 mm length fibres with diameters
around 0.2 mm emerged as the best option out
of thousands of tests.
Figure 1 shows the bending behaviour of
Ductal®. It can be observed that it has an ultimate
bending strength which is over twice its first
crack stress and more than ten times the ultimate
stress of conventional mortar. Such very high
strength and consequent ductility allows the
design of structures without any secondary
passive reinforcement and no shear
reinforcement.
The ductile behaviour observed in the bending
test before the peak is characterised by multiple
cracking, without any localisation of a major
crack, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 1: Ductal® behaviour in bending
71
Figure 2 (left) shows an image obtained by X-
ray scanning, where can be seen the high density
of fibres (2% volume) of a 40x40x40 mm cube
sawn from a Ductal® beam (courtesy of TOMO-
ADOUR). Figure 2 (right) shows multiple cracking
in the tensile zone as observed after bending
failure; it is noticeable that the crack widths are
so small that they cannot be seen by the naked
eye and the surface needs to be wetted with
alcohol to reveal the cracks; the appearance of
the single visible crack coincides with the peak
load (“localisation” process).
Creep & Shrinkage BehaviourCreep and shrinkage are probably the most
outstanding characteristics of Ductal®. Creep was
tested by ECN [3]. For normal concrete the so-
called creep coefficient can reach 3 to 4, for high-
performance concrete the creep coefficient is
reduced, but the delayed strain is already higher
than the elastic one. The creep coefficient of
Ductal® is less than 0.8 and, when a thermal
treatment is applied, the creep coefficient is as
low as 0.2 (Figure 3) [4]. When using prestressing
technology, the prestress losses are substantially
reduced.
This very surprising result has been analysed [5],
and this analysis will certainly impact our view on
the creep mechanisms and theory.
As the water to cement ratio is very low,
Ductal® does not exhibit any drying (no weight
loss can be measured) nor drying shrinkage. A
high autogenous shrinkage can be observed (300
to 400 microstrain) but when a heat treatment is
applied, this shrinkage is completed at the end of
the treatment and, when this treatment is over,
absolutely no residual shrinkage occurs (Figure 4).
Fire And High Temperature Fire resistance is one of the main issues for
developments in the building industry. For
material developments like any concrete, Ultra
High Performance Concretes are listed in the M0
class of products (non-inflammable) which slow
down the spread of fire. However, the very low
porosity of UHPCs induces greater internal
stresses. In these materials, the porosity is totally
enclosed, which prevents water vapour (steam)
from escaping. By increasing the pressure within
the material the spalling phenomenon occurs.
Spalling has been almost suppressed by using
adequate organic fibres. Above 150°C such fibres
begin to soften and melt, thereby providing
escape routes for trapped steam. This approach
was applied to a new Ductal®. As the matrix is
completely closed when compared to an HPC
matrix, very important work was performed in
order to up-grade Ductal® and to find the correct
mix, geometry of fibres and the dosage when
Figure 3: Ductal® basic creep [3]
Figure 4: Ductal® shrinkage: afterthermal treatment, no shrinkage isobserved [3]
Figure 2: 3-D image (left), multiple cracking (right)
72
keeping the target of ultra high strength, very
good workability and no spalling when subjected
to fire.
Different kinds of structures, loaded or
unloaded columns, loaded and unloaded beams,
were tested in France (CSTB) and Finland (VTT),
under ISO fire with success. Direct tensile
hot tests were also performed by the Politecnico
di Milano [6].
The mechanical properties of this new
Ductal® referred to as Ductal®-AF are similar to
Ductal®-FM.
DurabilityThe microstructure of Ductal® is completely
closed and prevents the intrusion of any
aggressive agent. Such characteristics give the
material an ultra-high durability performance.
Full characterisation of the durability properties
of the material were performed in different
laboratories - INSA Toulouse, LCPC, EDF/CEMETE,
ESPCI, Mines de Nancy, LERM - in which the
porosity distribution, gas permeability,
carbonation, chlorine diffusion, leaching and the
MNR microstructure characterisation tests were
made. Also the chemical stability of the material
was checked [7].
Freeze-thaw tests were performed on Ductal®
samples at CEA [8] and also at CEBTP. The tests
were performed for 300 cycles above the
normative 100 cycles without any degradation.
UHPFRCs materials stand up to chemical
conditions under which ordinary reinforced
concretes are rapidly and severely damaged.
Laboratory tests were performed by CSIC (Spain)
in which Ductal® was submitted to different
aggressive chemical compounds (calcium sulfate,
sodium sulfate, acetic acid, ammonium sulfide
and nitrate and also sea water and distilled
water). The results exhibit a very good resistance
to chemical attack [2].
Other severe operating condition tests were
performed at IFP in which Ductal® was submitted
to different gases (CO2, CH4, H2S), at high
temperature (120°C) and high pressure (7MPa)
showing again unexpected high resistance.
Ageing tests were also performed at CSTB in
which the self-sealing of Ductal® was
demonstrated [9].
APPLICATIONSThe ultra high performance of Ductal® opens
up applications in different domains requiring at
least :
• ultra high strength
• durability
• architectural aspects
Mechanical StrengthA material with such high ultimate
compressive and flexural-tensile strength offers
interesting opportunities in the field of
prestressed concrete. As might be expected, the
high flexural tension capacity also gives rise to
extremely high shear capacity. This allows
Ductal® to carry the shear loads in a structure
without providing auxiliary shear reinforcement.
The elimination of passive reinforcement
makes it possible to use thinner sections and a
wider variety of innovative and acceptable cross-
sectional shapes. The current structural precast
shapes used for prestressed beams in bridges and
buildings have been shaped for concretes with
much lower strength properties. Their dimensions
and design would not allow to take advantage of
very high performances of Ductal®. In order to
make the best use of the higher mechanical
properties, there are several opportunities to
introduce new shapes in prestressed beam
design. Through such re-design approach of the
elements the beam dead load can be reduced by
a factor of three.
Figure 5: Seonyu footbridge, Korea (left) and Sakata Mirai footbridge, Japan (right)
73
Among these kinds of applications we can list
the Shepherds Traffic Bridge erected in
Australia[10], 5 footbridges: Sherbrooke footbridge
in Canada, Seonyu footbridge in Korea (Figure 5)[11], Sermaises footbridge in France, Sakata Mirai
(Figure 5) and Akakura footbridges in Japan and
the canopies of the LRT station of Shawnessy
(Figure 6).
Durability Oriented Applications The durability of Ductal® is as important as the
mechanical strength. Combining strength and
durability, Ductal® can be an ideal solution for
structures in severe environments. Also the
durability of the material lowers maintenance
costs and makes the solution very competitive.
Ductal® was used in several durability/fire
resistance oriented applications like the beams
and girders (more than 2000) used for the
Cattenom power plant cooling tower in France,
the retained earth anchorages (more than 6000)
used in Réunion Island (Figure 7) and the Ductal®-
AF used for the construction of composite
columns in the Reina Sofia Museum in Madrid
(Spain).
Architectural ApplicationsThe use of a concrete-like material but with
almost unlimited possibilities of appearance,
texture and colour has excited architects by giving
them access to an unexpected new world of
shapes and volumes. Ductal® was used in several
architecturally oriented applications like the bus
shelters in Tucson (USA), flower pots in Rennes
(France), shower booths, sun shades (Fig. 8),
façade panels in Monaco and Kyoto clock tower
in Japan.
CONCLUSIONDuctal® is a new technology of ultra high
strength concretes that constitutes a
breakthrough in concrete mix design. This family
of products is characterised by a very dense
microstructure and very high compressive
strength achieving and possibly exceeding 200
MPa. Steel and organic fibres or a combination of
both are one of the major components of the
material, enhancing the bending strength,
ductility and fire resistance.
The three main categories of applications are:
- Mechanical strength: The very high
mechanical properties combined with prestressing
technology offer engineers and architects a lot of
opportunities to design elegant structures by
avoiding heavy steel reinforcement. Ductal®
technology gives access to very slender and
elegant structures like footbridges.
- Durability: the very dense microstructure of
the Ductal® matrix offers a material which resists
very aggressive environments and therefore opens
up a very wide range of applications.
Figure 6: Ductal®-FO canopies - LRTTrain Station, Shawnessy, Canada
Figure 7: Ductal®
retained earthanchors – La RéunionIsland
Figure 8: Architectural applications -examples
Flower pots, Rennes
Sun shades, La Doua university Lyon
74
- Architectural: a very wide range of textures
and colours effects are accessible to Ductal®.
Such properties provide architects with very high
potential of innovative design in all elements that
build up new architecture.
REFERENCES1. Orange, G.; Dugat, J.; Acker, P.; ‘A new
generation of UHP concrete: Ductal®.Damage resistance and micromechanicalanalysis’, Proc. of the 3d Internat. RILEMWorkshop, HPFRCC3. (1999), 101-111.
2. BFUP. AFGC, ‘Ultra High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concretes, InterimRecommendations’, AFGC publication,France, (2002).
3. Loukili, A; Richard,P and Lamirault,J; ‘AStudy on Delayed Deformations of an UltraHigh Strength Cementitious Material’;Fourth CANMET/ACI/JCI Conference,Special Publication, American ConcreteInstitute SP-179. (1998) 929- 950.
4. Acker, P.; ‘Why does Ultrahigh-PerformanceConcrete (UHPC) exhibit such a LowShrinkage and such a Low Creep ?’;Proceedings of: Autogenous Deformationsof Concrete, ACI Fall Convention, Phoenix,USA (2002).
5. Acker, P.; ‘Swelling, shrinkage and creep: amechanical approach to cement hydration’;Concrete Science & Engineering, Vol. 37(2004) 11-17.
6. Behloul, M.; ‘Fire resistance of Ductal Ultrahigh Performance Concrete’; Proc. FIB 2002,Osaka, Japan. Vol. 2. (2002) 101-110.
7. Vernet, C.; ‘UHPC Microstructure andrelated Durability Performances - LaboratoryAssessment and Field Experience Examples’;PCI / FHWA 3rd International Symposium onHPC, Orlando, USA (2003).
8. ‘Conteneur haute intégrité à base de lianthydraulique tenue aux cycles gel/dégel’;Rapport scientifique 1997-CEA, Directiondu cycle du combustible- ISSN 0429-3460,(1997) 152-159.
9. Pimienta, P.; Chanvillard, G.; ‘Retention ofthe mechanical performances of Ductalspecimens kept in various aggressiveenvironments’; Fib Symposium, Avignon,France (2004).
10. B.Cavill and G.Chirgwin. ‘The worlds firstDuctal road bridge Sherpherds gully creekbridge, NSW’; 21st Biennial Conference ofthe Concrete Institute of Australia, Brisbane(2003).
11. Behloul,M.; Lee, KC.; ‘Ductal Seonyufootbridge’; Structural Concrete. 4 (4),(2003) 195-201.
12. Hartmann, J.; Graybeal, B.; Perry, V.;Durukal, A.; ‘Early Results of the FHWAUHPC Research Program’; InternationalConference on Advanced Materials forConstruction of Bridges, Buildings andOther Structures, Davos, Switzerland(2003).
13. Chuang, E.-Y.; Ulm, F.-J.; ‘Two-phasecomposite Model for high performancecementitious composites’; M.ASCE Journalof Engineering Mechanics, (2002)1314-1323.
Abbreviation Name ExplanationBFUP Béton Fibré Ultra Performant Ultra high performance fibre-
reinforced concreteSETRA Service d’Etudes Techniques French administration for roads and
des routes et autoroutes bridgesECN Ecole Centrale de Nantes Engineering school at Nantes, FranceCSTB Centre Scientifique et Technique Testing/approval organisation for
du Batîment building application (Private/Public), FranceVTT Vattion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus Technical Research Centre of FinlandINSA Institut National des Engineering school, France
Sciences AppliquéesLCPC Laboratoire Centrale des Ponts Government laboratory for roads and
et Chaussées bridges FranceEDF/CEMETE Electricité De France Testing laboratory of the electricity
distributor in FranceESPCI Ecole Spéciale de Physique et Physics and Chemistry university
Chimie Industrielles – Paris, France LERM Private testing laboratory, FranceCEA Commissariat de l’Energie Atomique Atomic Energy Agency. France.CEBTP Centre d’Essais pour le Batiment Private laboratory for civil engineering,
et les Travaux Publics FranceCSIC Spanish testing laboratory, Madrid, SpainIFP Institut Français du Petrol French Oil Institute
LIST OF ORGANISATIONS
75
Mario Corradi is a graduate in
Industrial Chemistry from Milan
University. He is the Senior Vice
President of Technology and
Development for Business Unit
Admixtures System Europe of
Degussa Construction Chemicals. He has more
than 30 years of experience in R&D and
technology management in construction
chemicals.
ABSTRACTThe Italian high speed rail network is a part of
the European Project for the reorganisation of the
rail transport system to link the countries of the
Union by 2010. The section between Milan and
Bologna has a length of 182 km and crosses
Lombardia and Emilia regions. In the province of
Modena there is a complex system of bridges that
cross the existing motorways, urban roads, the
Panaro and Secchia Rivers. The main contractor
for the 24,760 m bridges is the Modena Scarl
Consortium. The bridge network consist of 755
omega shaped precast beams of 24 to 31.5 m
span and 9 cast in situ beams of 136 m span.
This complex system required innovative
construction techniques and a special precast
factory was set up by the contractor Pizzarotti.
The prefabrication process starts with the
assembly of the reinforcement cages in 8
templates that are able to produce 2 cages per
day. The assembly is completed with the anchor
heads, ducts with the prestressing cables and are
then positioned on the casting beds.
The particular shape and the density
of the reinforcement required a
concrete with some specific
properties. Durability was another
requirement. Specific admixtures
were developed for this project and
their mechanism of action is
presented in this paper. Also, some
details on the design and
construction techniques adopted on
this project are presented. In spite
of the complexity of the works the
Project was completed ahead of the
scheduled date.
KEYWORDSRailways, Viaducts, Bridges, Precasting plant,
Prestressing, Reinforcement, Formwork, Concrete
mix, Superplasticisers, Monomers.
INTRODUCTIONThe Italian high speed rail network is a part of
the European Project for the reorganisation of the
rail transport system to link the countries of the
Union by 2010. The Italian link extends over 1400
km along the main routes from Turin to Venice
and from Milan to Sicily with links to the rest of
Europe (see Figure 1).
The Italian State Railway has appointed TAV
(Treno Alta Velocità) for the design and
construction of the 1100 km of the track and the
General Contractor is Cepav Uno. The guiding
principle for the design of this section was to
increase the capacity of the whole railway system
by integration with the existing network with the
maximum respect of the environment by the use
of advanced technology and high quality
standards
The section between Milan and Bologna has a
length of 182 km and crosses Lombardia and
Emilia regions. The railway track follows the
“Autostrada del Sole” motorway to Modena. In
the province of Modena the track deviates from
the motorway and there is a complex system of
bridges that cross the existing motorways, urban
roads, the Panaro and Secchia Rivers (see Figure 2).
ADVANCED CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY FOR A COMPLEX
BRIDGE SYSTEM WITH LOW ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Dr. Mario Corradi
Degussa Construction Chemicals Europe, Italy
Figure 1: The European High Speed Train Network
76
The track will cross the territory of 42
communes. There are four types of construction
involved: embankments (63%), viaducts (34%),
trenches or cuts (2.7%) and tunnels (0.3%). The
main contractor for the 24,760 m bridges is the
Modena Scarl, a Consortium Pizzarotti,
Snamprogetti and Aquater .
THE MODENA VIADUCTS SYSTEM
The system of viaducts develops over a length
of 24,760 metres and consists of two types of
structures. The major part consists of omega-
shaped precast and prestressed beams produced
in a plant specially build for this project. The
location of the plant was selected so as to be
equidistant from the various viaducts to be
constructed. 755 beams were produced for a
total length of 23,538 metres of which 713
beams have a span of 31.50 metres, 28 beams of
29.00 metres and 14 beams of 24 metres. The
remaining 1223 metres were cast in situ as
continuous beams, 9 in number, having a span of
136 metres.
THE PRECAST CONCRETE PLANT
The reinforcement assemblyThe reinforcement cages are produced in a
147.5 x 74.4 m shed where there are 8 templates
for the assembly of the reinforcement. The head
of the formwork is already positioned and its
inclination is regulated as per the design. A
squad of 12 persons complete the assembly of
the reinforcement for one beam in 4 days. The
weight of the cage for the 31.50 m span beam is
about 33 tonnes. 10 cages are produced per
week. The assembly already has the prestress
ducts and the 20 cables already positioned. Each
cable has 12 tendons of 0.6”. The handling of
the reinforcement is carried out with the help of
4 gantry cranes, each of 12.5 tonne capacity. The
assembled cage is transported to the casting bed
by a special lifting and transport system. Figure 3
shows assembly of the reinforcement cages.
The concrete production plant The concrete production plant has two
terminals for discharging the concrete. At the first
point, used only in case of emergency, is the
traditional type where components are loaded
into the truck mixer for subsequent mixing and
transport. The second point has two forced action
pan mixer, each of 3.2 m3 capacity. These mixers
discharge the concrete into two agitating
containers of 7 m3 capacity. From these containers
the concrete is fed into two pumps for
transporting and distributing it to the forms.
Figure 4 shows the plant.
The concrete casting shed andformwork
The dimensions of the shed where the omega
shaped beams are cast are 37.20 m x 133.50 m.
There are 2 casting beds with 3 external
formworks each. Each bed is provided with an
internal form which moves on a rail track. The
Figure 3: The reinforcement assemblytemplate
Figure 2: Track section between Milan and Bologna
Figure 4: The concrete production plant
77
internal and the external forms are equipped with
fixed electric vibrators of 1.7 of kW and 2000 kg
centrifugal force with variable frequency. These
vibrators are operated in sequential zones. The
upper part of the pour is compacted with
electrical poker vibrators. Two gantry cranes of
12.5 tonne capacity are available for supporting
the production process. Each casting bed has an
independent compressed air plant and water
supply for cleaning out the concrete pump and
the hose. The pour for the standard 31.50 m
beam requires 276 m3 of concrete and the pour is
completed in four hours. After about 24 hours,
when the concrete has achieved a compressive
strength of 30 MPa, the internal formwork is
extracted and the forms at the two extremities of
the beam are removed. At this stage the beams
are partially prestressed to 35% of the design
value and transported to the stockyard. Two
beams are produced daily with a total of 10
beams per week. Figure 5 shows the set-up in the
casting shed.
In the stockyard the beams are placed on
columns where the bearings have been
positioned. There are 16 stations for this type of
operation. These bearings are then fixed to the
beam. When the concrete in the beam achieves a
compressive strength of 45 MPa, the final post-
tensioning of the cables is carried out. The cables
are then injected with a special grout made with
Flowcable, a specific admixture for these types of
applications.
THE CONCRETEThe concrete for the beams had some special
requirements. The characteristic compressive
strength (fck) was 45 MPa and the minimum
strength at 24 hours was 30 MPa for the
application of the initial post tensioning (35% of
the design value). The cement used was type
CEM I 52,5. A limestone filler, two types of sand
and three classes of coarse aggregates with a
maximum size of 32 mm were used. The
consistence class of the fresh concrete was S5
(slump > 220 mm). The mixture composition, per
cubic metre, is given in Table 1.
The superplasticiser used was specially
formulated for this project and is based on the
state of the art Total Performance Control
concept. The mechanism of action of the
superplasticiser is briefly illustrated here.
Superplasticiser PCE SKYSuperplasticiser PCE SKY is based on
innovative polycarboxylic ether polymers designed
according to a specific balance between electrical
charges, side chains, length of the main
backbone, new functional monomers and
molecule geometry. This nanotechnology is the
fruit of the experience built up over several
decades in the design of polymers in the nano-
metric scale and in the comprehension of the
phenomena occurring between superplasticisers
and the cement surface. In order to better
understand the novelty of these molecules, it is
worthwhile to summarise the mechanism of
action of the state of the art superplasticisers.
In general, traditional superplasticisers such as
beta naphthalene formaldehyde condensate,
which are formed by a backbone with negative
functional groups attached to it, act through a
mechanism of adsorption of the molecules onto
the cement particles. This creates an electrostatic
repulsive effect which results in the dispersion of
cement particles. However, because of the
hydration process, the molecules are subsequently
covered by the crystals of the hydration products
Figure 5: Positioning of the internalformwork
Cement CEM I 52,5 360 kg
Limestone filler 4.5% 85 kg
Sand 0-2 mm 7.5% 102 kg
Sand 0-8 mm 37% 702 kg
Gravel 8-12 mm 11% 209 kg
Coarse aggregate 15-22 mm 23% 436 kg
Coarse aggregate 22-32 mm 17% 322 kg
Water 137 l
PCE Superplasticiser 5.2 l
W/C 0.39
Table 1: The concrete mixturecomposition
78
thus causing a decrease of the repulsive effect
and loss of workability over time.
The polycarboxylate superplasticisers available
on the market nowadays are characterised not
only by the presence in their structure of electrical
charges but also of side chains. The side chains
improve not only the water reducing effect but,
especially the workability retention properties due
to their steric effect.
However, due to the intrinsic nature of their
chemical structure, an optimisation of the water
reduction capabilities leads to a worsening of the
workability retention and vice-versa.
Therefore, using this kind of technology, which
has been anyway the most effective one available
so far, is a compromise between water reduction
and workability retention obtained.
A complication in the mechanism of action of
the existing superplasticisers is the chemical
composition of cement that, in some cases,
prevents the complete exploitation of the
performance of the admixture. The cause of this
incompatibility can often be found in what
happens in the first minutes of the hydration
process. In the first few minutes the water reacts
with the aluminate phases of cement forming a
dense growth of crystals, or what can be
compared with a “lawn”, of ettringite, which can
have a thickness in the range of microns.
Depending on the kinetics of formation of
ettringite and the kinetics of adsorption of the
superplasticiser, which has dimensions in the
range of nano-metres, we can have two different
situations (Figure 6):
• The adsorption of the superplasticiser is
above the ettringite “lawn”. In this case
there is a good dispersing effect
• The adsorption of the superplasticisers is
below the ettringite “lawn”. In this case the
superplasticiser is being covered and,
therefore, cannot act any longer. In this
situation part of the superplasticiser may be
considered to be wasted.
Since the chemical composition of the cement
can considerably influence the kinetics of
formation of ettringite, it is clear that it can play
an important role in the compatibility between
the cement and the superplasticiser.
As previously mentioned, the usual tool to
control the rate of adsorption and workability
retention of a state of the art polycarboxylic
polymer is the ratio between the negative
charges and the side chains, which also affect the
water reduction capability.
The key aspect of the SKY molecules is the
presence of new functional monomers which
control the adsorption rate of the polymer
without having a side effect on the water
reduction. The hypothesis of the mechanism of
action is that these new monomers act as
“parachutes” slowing down the adsorption, and
thus controlling the workability retention; and not
wasting the polymer that could be adsorbed
under the ettringite “lawn” (Figure 7).
Figure 6: Adsorption of the superplasticiser
79
This allows the obtaining of an independent
control on the water reduction and on the
workability retention. These two properties are
opposing performances in the state of the art
superplasticisers technology.
But with the innovative superplasticisers it is
possible to minimise the sensitivity of the
polymers with respect to the chemical
composition of the various cements (Figure 8).
“TAILOR MADE” BEAMSMany specialists and authorities are involved in
the planning and selection of the route that the
railway track has to take. They include
management of the transportation system,
electrical, mechanical and hydraulic engineers
(waterway crossings), specialists in environmental
studies and analysis of environmental impact,
Figure 7: Parachute effect of the monomers
Figure 8: Balancing performances of concrete with SKY polymer
80
acoustic engineers (for urban sites) and landscape
architects, just to list a few players in the decision
making. All this must fulfil many criteria related
to user comfort, speed of use, security of the
existing structures during construction,
harmonious integration into the surroundings.
The bridge engineer plays a central role in this
process. To overcome the diverse type of
obstacles such as, motorways, state highways and
urban roads and river crossing, encountered on
this route, two techniques of bridge construction
were selected for the cast in situ concrete. 9
viaducts of 136 m span and consisting of
sections 40 m, 50 m and 40 m between the
piers. These beams also have an omega shape
section and made up of sections of 53.10 m,
57.45 m and 25.4 m. The construction technique
adopted is such that the load distribution in the
structure is as if it was a monolithic hyper static
structure.
Figure 9 shows the construction phase of
beams cast with the traditional formworks and
Figure 10 shows the construction of beams with
self supporting formwork across the Secchia River.
CONCLUSIONSThe construction of the bridge network around
Modena posed major challenges which required
innovative solutions that took in consideration the
environmental impact. On its completion by the
end of 2005 it will link the south of Italy to the
rest of Europe through Bologna.
FURTHER READING
1. Impresa Pizzarotti & C., Sistema ViadottiModena: Le Travi ad Omega, InternalPublication, November 2004 (in Italian).
2 Corradi, M., Khurana, R., Magarotto, R.,Total Performance Control: An innovativetechnology for improving the performancesof fresh and hardened ready mixedconcrete, Proceedings of ERMCO Congress,Helsinki, June 2004.
Figure 9: Construction of Modena Westinter-crossing
Figure 10: Construction of the bridgeacross the Secchia River
81
Kshemendra Nath is currently
working with Elkem India
Private limited, part of the
Norway-based Elkem ASA, as
the Deputy Managing Director,
responsible for the Elkem
Materials business in India and the SAARC
countries. He is a civil engineering graduate with
more than 17 years of experience in the building
materials, construction and ready-mixed concrete
industry in India. He is also a corporate member
of the Institute of Concrete Technology. Prior to
joining Elkem, Kshemendra Nath worked as the
General Manager sales and marketing and also as
General Manager – Technical and Marketing of
RMC Readymix India Limited, part of the RMC
Group plc UK.
ABSTRACTThis paper discusses the use of high
performance microsilica concrete for the Bandra-
Worli sea link project in Mumbai. The sea-link
which is built over the Arabian sea is subject to
severe exposure and high ambient temperatures.
This necessitated the use of high performance
concrete in the structure with stringent concrete
specifications, particularly on its resistance to
chlorides and water penetration. The transporting
and placing of high performance concrete in the
sea was a challenging task. The success of the
sea-link is crucial, as there are a few more similar
projects in the pipeline in Mumbai including the
extension of this sea-link to south Mumbai and a
bigger 22 km long trans-harbour link project
connecting Mumbai and New Mumbai.
KEYWORDSHigh performance concrete, Microsilica,
Durability, Slump retention, Pile, Pile cap, Precast
box girder.
INTRODUCTIONThe Bandra-Worli Sea-Link is a prestigious
project that envisages the construction of 5.86
km long eight-lane freeway to be built across the
Arabian sea. The sea-link is expected to de-
congest traffic in Mumbai and reduce travel time
to south Mumbai. Most of the concrete specified
for this project is high strength, high
performance.
Distinctive features of this bridge are:
(a) Out of the 5.86 km length, the length of
the bridge portion is 4 km including a
500m long cable-stayed portion,
(b) Two independent four-lane, cable-stayed
bridges of 500 m length on a single pylon
of 126 metre height,
(c) Two independent four-lane, cable-stayed
bridges of 350 m length at the Worli end,
(d) The bridge is supported on friction piles.
The piles are drilled and concreted in the
sea bed, 8-10 m below water level,
(e) There are two curves on the sea-link, for
which different types of trapezoidal
segments (in plan) are necessary.
(f) The superstructure consists of precast,
prestressed box girders.
The segmental construction is made of high
performance concrete (HPC), M60 grade, with
Microsilica. The segments are post-tensioned
longitudinally. Each Segment will accommodate
four lanes of traffic and the maximum weight of
each will be about 140 tonnes. Total concrete
required is estimated at 200,000 m3, out of
which about 100,000 m3 of M 60 grade concrete
will be required for about 3050 precast segments.
The remaining concrete is for piles, pile caps,
piers and pier caps in the sea.
The sea-link will provide a faster and safer
north / south traffic corridor. It is expected that
this facility will cut down by approximately 45
minutes, the time taken to reach Worli from
Bandra, a suburb of Mumbai. In the second
phase, which is currently in the planning stage,
Worli will be connected with Nariman Point in the
central business district of Mumbai in the
southernmost part of the city.
HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE
MaterialsOrdinary Portland Cement (OPC)
OPC 53 grade conforming to IS-12269 was
selected for use in concrete.
HIGH-PERFORMANCE MICROSILICA CONCRETE FOR THE
BANDRA-WORLI SEA-LINK, MUMBAI
Kshemendra Nath, BTech, MICT
Elkem India Private Limited
82
Microsilica
Elkem Microsilica in slurry form (50:50)
conforming to ASTM C - 1240, was used for the
high performance concrete. The slurry was
produced at site in two blender units having the
capacity to produce and store 2 tonnes of
Microsilica in slurry form and were installed near
the batching plant.
Fly ash
ASTM Class F fly ash conforming to the
requirement of ASTM C-618 from field 3 of the
thermal power station at Dahanu, 90 km from
Mumbai, was utilized after conducting the
necessary physical and chemical tests.
Aggregates
Crushed basalt rock of maximum size 20mm
was used as coarse aggregate. Fine aggregate
consisted of crushed sand manufactured from
basalt rock and river sand from the Ambica river.
Admixture
A sulphonated naphthalene formaldehyde-
based high-range water reducing admixture
conforming to ASTM C - 494 Type G was used.
Durability tests specified for the concrete
included a water penetrability test and a rapid
chloride penetration test. The specifications were:
• Concrete shall meet a permeability of less
than 25mm as determined by the DIN 1048
test
• Chloride penetrability when tested as per
AASHTO 227 shall be between 100 and
1000 coulombs.
Concrete ProductionConcrete was from two plants each producing
90 m3/hour; one for the precast yard, and one for
the in situ casting. Both plants were supplied with
silica fume in a slurry form, from two individual
mixer units at each plant. This enabled the rapid
and thorough dispersion of the silica fume
throughout the low w/c ratio mix.
The concrete produced for the in situ casting
had to be transported and placed within the sea
and thus required special arrangements. The
concrete, after mixing at batching plant, was
discharged through a conveyor into the transit
mixers mounted on barges, which then hauled it
to the placing point. The concrete, after arrival at
the placing point ,was taken in buckets, which
discharged into the concrete pumps located on
the jack-up platform. The concrete was finally
placed by means of a pump.
Figure1: Plant truck to skip
Figure 2: Skip to transit mixer on abarge
Figure 3: Barge to offshore piling rig
Figure 4: Barge skip to pour into pilingrig
83
Precast segments
About 100,000 m3 of concrete of grade M 60
meeting the specified durability parameters was
used in the casting of the precast box girders.
Typical compressive strength results obtained
are given below:
Pile Concrete
M-50 Grade Microsilica concrete was specified
for the in situ piling. Since the batching plant was
situated on shore and the average transportation
time amounted to 3 hours, the concrete was
designed to give a slump of 180 mm at 3 hours
after mixing. In the high ambient temperatures
prevailing in Mumbai, establishing the mix proved
to be really challenging.
Typical compressive strengths achieved were as
follows;
Continuos improvements were made to the
mix to arrive at the optimal costs and the current
mix design is reproduced in Table 1 below.
Pile Cap Concrete
As per the project specifications, the
characteristic strength of the concrete in the pile
cap is 60 MPa. The target mean strength has
been stipulated as 74 MPa.
Typical compressive strength results achieved
for the pile cap concrete are as below:
The pile cap was to be cast at a level of 2-4 m
below the mean sea level within the tidal
variation. Further, due to the large dimensions of
the pile cap, control of temperature of the
concrete and thermal gradients were essential to
prevent the development of thermal cracks. From
these considerations, the specifications required
that the maximum temperature of concrete
should be limited to 70ºC and the maximum
temperature difference between the core and the
surface should be limited to 20ºC.
Installing thermocouples at different locations
in the pile cap monitored the temperature of the
concrete. The maximum temperature observed
was 68ºC and the difference between the core
and surface of concrete was less than 20ºC.
MIX OPTIMIZATIONContinuous improvements and
monitoring of the performance of the concrete
have resulted in optimization of the mix. The
current mix proportions are shown in the table on
the following page.
CONCLUDING SUMMARYThe effective use of high performance
microsilica concrete is possible, economic and
practical in the Indian environment.
The success of the high performance concrete
application in the Bandra-Worli sea-link will
hopefully result in similar specifications for
important structures, especially those subjected to
aggressive environments. This will also lead to the
concept of life cycle cost gaining currency in India
and will encourage good construction practices
and better concrete structures to be built.
Figure 5: Artist’s view of Bandra-WorliSea-link when completed
Characteristic Strength M60
Target strength 74 MPa
Minimum Microsilica content 10% of
cement
Maximum W/c ratio 0.35
Compressive strength (20 hours) 22 MPa
Compressive strength (48 hours) 35 MPa
Slump (Initial) 200 mm
Slump (3 hours) 160 mm
Time Strength (MPa)
20 hours 26
1 day 30
48 hours 40
3 days 52
7 days 64
28 days 75
Time Strength (MPa)
3 days 33
7 days 48
28 days 64
Time Strength (MPa)
3 days 39
7 days 56
28 days 76
84
Material Mix quantities (kg/m3)
Grade of concrete M 50 M 60 M 60
Unit type Pile Precast Segment Pile Cap
Cement 364 420 300
Microsilica slurry 36 42 40
Flyash 0 0 196
Total binder content 400 462 536
20 mm aggregate 520 540 577
10 mm aggregate 450 460 500
River sand 470 440 423
Crusher dust 480 480 327
Free water 134 127 134
Admixture 3% 3.2% 2.50%
Water/binder ratio 0.34 0.27 0.25
Initial slump 220 200 220
Final slump 200 (3 Hrs) 190 (2 Hrs) 170 (4 Hrs)
Table 1: Current mix details
Limits are ourChallenge.
Our daily challenge is to push the limits to find unusual solutions. We do it by applying our innovation potential and our understanding
of the market. Using this combination, we get more out of concrete. We are constantly creating new and better properties for concrete, expanding
its field of application. That means added value for everyone in the project.
Degussa Construction Chemicals (UK),
Albany House, Swinton Hall Road, Swinton, Manchester M27 2DT
Tel: 0161 794 7411 Fax: 0161 727 8881
e-mail: [email protected] www.degussa-cc.co.uk Adding Value to Concrete
O S C R E T E
range ofadmixturesfor concreteand mortar
• Water repellents• Super plasticisers• Accelerators• Plasticisers/
process aids for semi dryproduction
• Retarders• Air entrainers• Mould release
agents
is the brand name of ADMIXTURESmanufactured and distributed by:
Christeyns UK LtdRutland Street, Bradford, West Yorkshire,BD4 7EA, UK
Tel: 01274 393286 Fax: 01274 309143
The
FM 09569
O S C R E T E
Impress the customers!Let them see you’ve reached
QSRMC Certificationfor ready mixed concrete
QSRMC is controlled by a Governing Board on which concreteproducers and major designers, specifiers and users of concrete –Highways Agency, National House-Building Council, Government
Construction Clients’ Forum, Ove Arup & Partners, BalfourBeatty Civil Engineering, Institution of Structural Engineers,
The Concrete Society – actively participate
Specified byname
Accepted withoutquestion
QSRMC 1 Mount Mews High Street Hampton TW12 2SH Tel: 020 8941 0273Visit the quality concrete website: www.qsrmc.co.uk
For our certification services covering other products/systems visit our new website: www.cpcert.co.uk
85
ADVANCED CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY DIPLOMA:
SUMMARIES OF PROJECT REPORTS 2004
The project reports are an integral and important part of the ACT Diploma.
The purpose of the projects is to show that the candidates can think about a topic or problem in alogical and disciplined way. The project normally spans some six months. Significant advances can bemade and several of the projects have evolved into research programmes in their own right.
Summaries of a selection of projects submitted during the 2003 - 2004 course are given in thefollowing pages.
PROJECT TITLE: AUTHOR:
THE EFFECTS OF RESTRICTED COVER AND CONGESTED REINFORCEMENT S. BrownON THE MOVEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF AGGREGATE
A PRACTICAL EVALUATION OF THE USE OF SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE G.F.R. EvansIN POWER-FLOATED INDUSTRIAL FLOORS
A STUDY OF VARYING SOURCES OF PORTLAND CEMENTS WITH B. HiscockSUPERPLASTICISING ADMIXTURES
A full list of earlier ACT projects, dating back to 1971 when the individual project was introduced as arequirement for the Advanced Concrete Technology Diploma examination, was published in the 2000 - 2001edition of the ICT yearbook. A list of subsequent reports is obtainable from the ICT.
Copies of the reports (except those that are confidential) are held in the Concrete Information Ltd (CIL) Libraryand these can be made available on loan. Subscribers to the CIL’s information service, Concquest, may obtaincopies on loan, free of charge. Requests should be addressed to: Concrete Information Ltd, 4 Meadows BusinessPark, Blackwater, Camberley, Surrey GU17 9AB.
ICT members may address their requests to: The Executive Officer, Institute of Concrete Technology, 4 MeadowsBusiness Park, Blackwater, Camberley, Surrey GU17 9AB. Copies can then be obtained from CIL free of charge.
8686
SUMMARYThis project examines the use of self-
compacting concrete (SCC) for industrial flooringapplications.
It includes a general background to thedevelopment of SCC and describes in detail arange of tests for measuring the fresh properties(workability, bleed and settlement) of theconcrete. These are those recommended in theEFNARC specification.
The process of selecting constituent materialsfor SCC is examined in detail, with particularemphasis on aggregates.
Five SCC mix designs were used in aprogramme of trial mixes. These included mixesbased on both Portland cement and acombination of Portland cement and fly ash. Themixes were tested using a range of rheologicaltests and also for compressive strength. Followingthe trials a mix containing Portland cement alone,with a 28 day compressive strength of 30 N/mm2,was selected for use in large scale trial panels (1.5m x 1.0 m x 0.50 m). This was compared to aconventional concrete of similar cement content.
Following placing the panels were power-floated. Visual observation combined withexamination of cores cut through the panels wasused to assess the effects of the finishing process.
It was concluded that:
• SCC mix design for industrial flooringrequires careful attention to the finefractions of the aggregate and fillers. Theamount of additions (extenders) should beminimised
• the use of a light vibrating beam prior topower-floating was beneficial for SCC
• the application of the power-float to theSCC should be delayed slightly relative toconventional concrete
• the use of fog sprays or plastic coveringimmediately after placing the SCCimproves the finishability
• overall, correctly proportioned SCC can befinished to the same standard asconventional concrete
• the cost of the SCC used in the trials wasonly about 10% higher than theequivalent conventional concrete.
A PRACTICAL EVALUATION OF THE USEOF SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE INPOWER-FLOATED INDUSTRIAL FLOORS
By: G.F.R. Evans
THE EFFECTS OF RESTRICTED COVERAND CONGESTED REINFORCEMENT ONTHE MOVEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OFAGGREGATE
By: S. Brown
SUMMARYThis project deals with the effect of coarse
aggregate size on the homogeneity of concrete inthe cover zone and in areas of congestedreinforcement.
Laboratory work involved casting both smallbeams (500 x 225 x 300 mm deep) and largerreinforced concrete columns (225 x 225 x 2100 mmhigh) The maximum aggregate size in the concretevaried from 19.0 mm to 26.5 mm and the cover tothe reinforcement or spacing between bars variedwithin the range 13 mm to 35 mm. This providedspecimens where the ratio of the depth of cover (orbar spacing) to the maximum aggregate sizeranged from 0.75:1 to 1.0:1 to 1.25:1.
Cores were cut from the hardened concrete toexamine visually the distribution of the coarseaggregate around the reinforcing bars. Although nohoneycombing was observed, it was apparent thatat a cover to aggregate size ratio of 1.0 or less, theconcrete surrounding the reinforcing bar wascharacterised by a lack of coarse aggregate and apaste-rich matrix. This in turn could increase the riskof cracking and reduce the resistance of the coverconcrete to the ingress of aggressive agents such aschlorides.
When the aggregate grading was altered toinclude more of the smaller (intermediate) sizefractions, the concrete surrounding the reinforcingbars became more homogeneous and less rich inpaste.
The conclusions drawn from this study were:
• the depth of cover or minimum spacingbetween reinforcing bars should be greaterthan 1.0 x the maximum aggregate size anda ratio of 1.25:1 is preferred
• sufficient spacer blocks should be used toensure that the correct cover is maintained
• the overall aggregate grading shouldinclude sufficient proportions of theintermediate size fractions to enable theconcrete directly surrounding the reinforcingbars to be homogeneous and not containexcessive amounts of cement paste
• concrete workability should be increased insections with congested reinforcement.
8787
A STUDY OF VARYING SOURCES OFPORTLAND CEMENTS WITHSUPERPLASTICISING ADMIXTURES
By: B. Hiscock
SUMMARYThe use of superplasticisers is now part of
established good concreting practice. However,their performance can vary and this report isconcerned with the interaction of Portlandcements from different sources together withthree types of superplasticiser.
Six differing cements were used, chosen forcompositional and physical variation. The cementscomplied with BS EN 197-1:2000.
The three superplasticers were representativeof sulphonated naphthalene and melamineformaldehyde condensate types together with thenew polyacrylic carboxylate or ‘comb’ type ofadmixture.
Admixture dosages varied from 500 ml to1500 ml/100 kg cement using ten mixes, one ofwhich was the control. A standard mixingsequence was used throughout.
Variation in concrete performance wasmanifested in plastic density, itself reflecting airentrainment and/or improved compaction.
The finer the cement the higher thesuperplasticiser dose required to achieve a givenworkability.
The effect of high alkali content in reducingworkability, particularly for polysulphonatedsuperplasticisers has been previously recorded.However, in this work the correlation wastenuous. A similar trend was found for the effectof varying the C3A content. The expectedcorrelation of low C3A with increased admixtureeffectiveness was not generally observed.
It is recommended that, due to theinconsistency of admixture performance withcement properties, trial mixes should be used toestablish their effectiveness on a case by casebasis.
88
ICT RELATED INSTITUTIONS & ORGANISATIONS
ASSOCIATION OFCONSULTING ENGINEERSAlliance House12 Caxton StreetLondon SW1H 0QLTel: 020 7222 6557www.acenet.co.uk
ASSOCIATION OF INDUSTRIALFLOORING CONTRACTORS33 Oxford StreetLeamington SpaCV32 4RATel: 01926 833 633www.acifc.org.uk
ASSOCIATION OF LIGHTWEIGHTAGGREGATE MANUFACTURERSWellington StRipleyDerbyshire DE5 3DZTel: 01773 746111
BRE (BUILDING RESEARCHESTABLISHMENT) LTDBucknalls LaneGarstonWatford WD25 9XXTel: 01923 664000www.bre.co.uk
BRITISH BOARD OF AGRÉMENTP.O.Box 195Bucknalls LaneGarstonWatfordHerts WD25 9BATel: 01923 665300www.bbacerts.co.uk
BRITISH CEMENT ASSOCIATION4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 608700www.bca.org.uk
BRITISH PRECASTCONCRETE FEDERATION60 Charles StreetLeicester LE1 1FBTel: 0116 253 6161www.britishprecast.org.uk
BSI STANDARDSBritish Standards House389 Chiswick High RoadLondon W4 4ALTel: 020 8996 9000www.bsi.org.uk
BRITPAVEBritish In-Situ ConcretePaving Association4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 33160www.britpave.org.uk
CEMENT ADMIXTURES ASSOCIATION38a Tilehouse Green LaneKnowleWest MidlandsB93 9EYTel: 01564 776362
CEMENTITIOUS SLAG MAKERS ASSOCIATIONCroudace HouseGoldstone RoadCaterhamSurrey CR3 6XQTel: 01883 331071www.ukcsma.co.uk
CONCRETE ADVISORY SERVICE4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 607140www.concrete.org.uk
CONCRETE BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT GROUP4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 33777www.cbdg.org.uk
CONCRETE INFORMATION LTD4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 608770www.concrete-info.com
CONCRETE REPAIR ASSOCIATIONAssociation House99 West StFarnhamSurrey GU9 7ENTel: 01252 739145www.cra.org.uk
THE CONCRETE CENTRE4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 606800www.concretecentre.com
THE CONCRETE SOCIETY4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 607140www.concrete.org.uk
CONSTRUCT4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 38444www.construct.org.uk
CIRIAConstruction Industry Research& Information Association
6 Storey’s GateWestminsterLondon SW1P 3AUTel: 020 7222 8891www.ciria.org.uk
CORROSION PREVENTION ASSOCIATIONAssociation House99 West StFarnhamSurrey GU9 7ENTel: 01252 739145www.corrosionprevention.org.uk
INSTITUTE OF CORROSIONCorrosion HouseVimy CourtLeighton BuzzardBeds LU7 1FG Tel: 01525 851771www.icorr.org
INSTITUTE OF MATERIALSMINERALS & MINING1 Carlton House TerraceLondon SW1Y 5DBTel: 020 7451 7300www.materials.org.uk
INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERSOne Great George StreetLondon SW1P 3AATel: 020 7222 7722www.ice.org.uk
INSTITUTION OF HIGHWAYS& TRANSPORTATION6 Endsleigh StreetLondon WC1H 0DZTel: 020 7387 2525www.iht.org
INSTITUTION OFROYAL ENGINEERSBrompton BarracksChathamKent ME4 4UGTel: 01634 842669
INSTITUTION OFSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERS11 Upper Belgrave StreetLondon SW1X 8BHTel: 020 7235 4535www.istructe.org.uk
INTERPAVEConcrete Block Paving Association60 Charles StreetLeicester LE1 1FBTel: 0116 253 6161www.paving.org.uk
MORTAR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION38-44 Gillingham StreetLondon SW1V IHUTel: 020 7963 8000www.mortar.org.uk
QSRMCQuality Scheme for ReadyMixed Concrete1 Mount Mews High Street, HamptonMiddlesex TW12 2SHTel: 020 8941 0273www.qsrmc.co.uk
QUARRY PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION38-44 Gillingham StreetLondon SW1V IHUTel: 020 7963 8000www.qpa.org
RIBARoyal Institute of British Architects66 Portland PlaceLondon W1B 1ADTel: 020 7580 5533www.architecture.com
SOCIETY OF CHEMICAL INDUSTRY14/15 Belgrave SquareLondon SW1X 8PSTel: 020 7598 1500www.sci.mond.org
UNITED KINGDOM ACCREDITATION SERVICE21-47 High StreetFelthamMiddlesex TW13 4UNTel: 020 8917 8400www.ukas.org.uk
UNITED KINGDOM CAST STONE ASSOCIATION4 Meadows Business ParkStation Approach BlackwaterCamberley GU17 9ABTel: 01276 608771www.ukcsa.co.uk
UNITED KINGDOM QUALITY ASH ASSOCIATIONRegent HouseBath AvenueWolverhamptonWV1 4EGTel: 01902 576 586www.ukqaa.org.uk
89
Published by:THE INSTITUTE OF
CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY4 Meadows Business Park,
Blackwater, Camberley, Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel/Fax: 01276 37831Email: [email protected]
Website: www.ictech.org
ICT YEARBOOK 2005-2006
EDITORIAL COMMITTEE
Professor Peter C. Hewlett (Chairman)BRITISH BOARD OF AGRÉMENT LTD
& UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE
Peter C. OldhamCHRISTEYNS UK LTD
Dr. Bill PriceLAFARGE CEMENT UK
Graham TaylorINSTITUTE OF CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
Laurence E. PerkisINITIAL CONTACTS
Rights reserved. No part of this publication maybe reproduced or transmitted in any formwithout the prior written consent of the
publisher. The comments expressed in thispublication are those of the Author and not
necessarily those of the ICT.
ISSN 1366 - 4824£50.00
Engineering CouncilProfessional Affiliate
Covers ICT 2005 20/8/2005 11:59 am Page 2
Yearbook: 2005-2006
CONCRETE TECHNOLOGYINSTITUTE OF
The
The I
NSTI
TUTE
OF
CO
NC
RETE
TEC
HN
OLO
GY
- Y
earb
oo
k:
2005-2
006
TheINSTITUTE OF CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY
4 Meadows Business Park, Blackwater, Camberley, Surrey GU17 9AB
Tel/Fax: 01276 37831Email: [email protected] Website: www.ictech.org
THE ICTThe Institute of Concrete Technologywas formed in 1972 from theAssociation of Concrete Technologists.Full membership is open to all thosewho have obtained the Diploma inAdvanced Concrete Technology. TheInstitute is internationally recognisedand the Diploma has world-wideacceptance as the leading qualificationin concrete technology. The Institutesets high educational standards andrequires its members to abide by a Codeof Professional Conduct, thus enhancingthe profession of concrete technology.The Institute is a Professional Affiliatebody of the UK Engineering Council.
AIMSThe Institute aims to promote concretetechnology as a recognised engineeringdiscipline and to consolidate theprofessional status of practisingconcrete technologists.
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIESIt is the Institute's policy to stimulateresearch and encourage the publicationof findings and to promotecommunication between academic andcommercial organisations. The ICTAnnual Convention includes a TechnicalSymposium on a subject of topicalinterest and these symposia are wellattended both by members and non-members. Many other technicalmeetings are held. The Institute isrepresented on a number of committeesformulating National and InternationalStandards and dealing with policymatters at the highest level. TheInstitute is also actively involved in theeducation and training of personnel inthe concrete industry and thoseentering the profession of concretetechnologist.
Covers ICT 2005 20/8/2005 11:59 am Page 1