Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    1/91

    100

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    2/91

    101

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    3/91

    102

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    4/91

    103

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    5/91

    Exhibit DR 1

    Civil Construction, LLC 2 year report Principals

    104

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    6/91EXHIBIT DR1, PG 001

    105

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    7/91EXHIBIT DR1, PG 002

    106

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    8/91

    Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 76-6 Filed 12/22/14 Page 1 of 2Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 88-4 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 2

    107

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    9/91

    Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 76-6 Filed 12/22/14 Page 2 oCase 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 88-4 Filed 01/12/15 Page 2 o

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    10/91

    Exhibit G.

    Two Recent Contracts wherein CNA, Inc was low Bidder

    109

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    11/91

    110

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    12/91

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    13/91

    112

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    14/91

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    15/91

    -1-

    EXHIBIT J

    Table I Factors Establishing a RICO Enterprise

    114

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    16/91

    -1-

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    )

    JOHN C. CHEEKS, et al )

    Plaintiffs ) Case No. 14-CV-00914 (RCL)

    v. )

    FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION )

    CORPORATION, et al., )

    Defendants. )

    )

    Footnotes to Table 1.

    1. All entities had a common purpose which was, and is, to obtain by illegal actions and fraudulent means DC Government contracts. Additionspecific purposes for each entity are added when appearing in Corporate documents of record.

    2. TheBoyle, supra case places emphasis upon actual inter - workings of functions and activities of the individual entities, on a continuing

    longevity basis sufficient to demonstrate a long-term viable operation amounting to a real overall objective of the RICO Enterprise via

    co-operation . Such relationships are clear from these table taken as a whole. Boyle, supra eliminated the heightened standards and extra text

    requirements previous toBoyle required by some circuits (DOJ Manual at pg. 11, 1)

    3. The Court indicated that although a RICO enterprise must have some longevity "long enough to pursue a course of conduct, nothing in RI

    exempts an enterprise whose associates engage in spurts of activity punctuated by periods of quiescence." Id. (Extracted From DOJ Manuapage 7, 2)

    4. Additionally, it is important to note what the Court stated was not required to establish an enterprise: a structural "hierarchy," "role

    differentiation," a "unique modus operandi," a "chain of command," "professionalism and sophistication of organization," "diversity and

    complexity of crimes," "membership dues, rules and regulations," "uncharged or additional crimes aside from predicate acts," an "internal

    discipline mechanism," "regular meetings regarding enterprise affairs," an "enterprise `name,"' and "induction or initiation ceremonies and

    rituals." 129 S. Ct. at 2245 (quoting Petitioner's Briefs and Oral Argument Transcript).

    115

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    17/91

    -2-

    TABLE 1

    ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EXISTENCE OF A RICO ENTERPRISE

    This Table is prepared under the guidelines set forth in the Department of Justice Manual for Federal Prosecutors in Appendix III, (DOJ Manual)following the Supreme Court Case ofBoyle v. United States, 556 U.S. 938, 129 S. Ct 2237 (2009). Extracted from DOJ Manual, Id, pg. 4

    Date Entity Purpose1

    Relationships2

    Longevity3

    Other4

    Explanation/Document--

    Reference

    On or About

    Jan 1, 2001 JoseRodriguez-CEO

    -and to manage theenterprise

    Executive of InterlockingCompanies

    FMCC, (Pres.,Board of

    Directors or BD);

    Civil Const. LLC (BD);

    Anchor Const.(BD)

    Rodriguez Family

    > 39 years

    Appointed

    1974Exhibit O Defendants Affiliation Matrix

    Complaint Original Exhibit FExhibit S1 pgs 4,5 Longevity

    On or AboutJan 1, 2001

    Francisco R. Neto

    -and to manage anenterprisecompany

    Executive of InterlockingCompanies

    Capitol Paving of DC

    ( Pres. Treas. BD);

    FMCC, VP,BD;

    Rodriguez Family

    >25 years .Exhibit O Defendants Affiliation Matrix

    Complaint Original Exhibit F

    Exhibit S3 pg 11 (since 1985

    On or AboutJan 1, 2001

    Lewis Shrensky

    -and to manage anenterprisecompany

    Executive of Interlocking

    Companies

    FMCC, (Treas. Sec.,BD);

    Civil Const. LLC ( BD)

    > 39 years

    Appointed

    1974Exhibit O Defendants Affiliation MatrixComplaint Original Exhibit FExhibit S1 pgs 4,5 Longevity

    116

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    18/91

    -4-

    1985Florentino Gregorio

    -and to manage anenterprisecompany

    Executive of interlockingcompanies

    Anchor Cont ( Pres. Sec)

    Rodriguez Family

    >20 yearsExhibit O Defendants Affiliation Matrix

    Complaint Original Exhibit FExhibit S2 Owner pg 1

    2002 Dora Rodriguez(Cooper)

    -and to assistmanaging acompany andsilence Ms.Gallardo

    Executive of interlockingcompanies

    Hawk Enterprises

    Rodriguez Family

    .>12 years

    Exhibit S1, pg14(FMCC employee)

    Exhibit DR1 (Civil Board of Directors)

    1987 Aurora Rodriguez-and to manage anenterprisecompany

    Executive of interlockingCompanies. MemberBoard of Directors

    >20yearsComplaint Original Exhibit FExhibit S1, pg 6(FMCC Employees 2012)

    1985 Cristina R.Gregorio,(Minton)

    -and to manage anenterprisecompany

    Executive of interlockingcompanies

    Anchor Cont ( Pres. Sec)Rodriguez Family

    >20 yearsExhibit O Defendants Affiliation Matrix

    Complaint Original Exhibit FExhibit S1, pg14(FMCC Employee 2012)

    March 6, 2008 SRNInvestors( Partners)

    - and commonowners lease

    property to RICOEnterprise

    owners Shrensky,Rodriguez and Neto

    10 years atleast since2004

    Exhibit S1 pgs, 10(for year) 11,12

    Date appears to be a family leasearrangement to corporation for land

    where plant is located.

    1974 topresent

    Fort Myer

    Construction

    -and to performcontracts

    Interlocking company byexecs. and family

    1974-pres>39 years

    Complaint Original Exhibit FExhibit O Defendants Affiliation Matrix

    Exhibit S1, pg1

    On or AboutJan 1, 2001 Anchor

    Construction,Formerly C&FConstruction.

    -and to sharepersonnel and

    5equipment

    Interlocking company byexecs. and family

    < 25 years Complaint Original Exhibit FExhibit O

    Exhibit S2, pg 1(Date Established)

    Gallardo Affidavit

    Name changed from C&F Construction to

    Anchor Construction Feb 1, 2005

    117

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    19/91

    -4-

    On or AboutJan 1, 2001

    Capitol Paving of

    DC-and to performcontracts

    Interlocking company byexecs. and family

    >25 years Complaint Original Exhibit F Exhibit OAdd Dora to FM fromExhibit S3pg 11(>25 yrs)

    On or AboutSept 13, 2000

    Civil ConstructionLLC, formerlyFMC Civil

    -and to perform

    contracts

    Interlocking company by

    execs. and family

    From atleast 2004

    Complaint Original Exhibit F. Exhibit OExhibit DR1 Dora R. Board of Directors

    Rodriguez and Shrensky family

    Longevity DOT History of Awards Table

    here,

    Gallardo Affidavit

    (Reference page 71, of Original Exhibits list)

    On or AboutJan 1, 2002

    Hawk Enterprises.

    -and to perform

    contracts a shell

    company whenFMCC debarred

    Interlocking company byexecs. and family: Dora

    Rodriguez

    Witness Juanita Gallardo testified that she

    was paid by a FM Civil (C&F) (Anchor)

    while her tenure at Hawk during the relevantperiod

    On or beforeJan 1, 2008 CNA Financial Corp.

    dba CNA Surety

    -and to providebonds enabling

    firms to bid

    Insurance provider toRICO Enterprise

    companies

    >20 years

    On or beforeJan 1, 2004 RICO Enterprise

    On or AboutMay 14, 2009

    Anchor

    Development of DCLLC

    -lease property toAnchor

    Exhibit S2 pg

    DCLLC Company which leases propertyto Anchor

    118

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    20/91

    -5-

    Supplement to Table 1: Longevity

    1. History of Construction Companies AwardsTable

    This Table is derived from Department of Transportation, indicates the longevity of the major construction companies of the RICO Enterprise

    2001-2009

    No.

    Ref. Contract or IFB

    No. Company with Low Bid Est. Date1 01-0160-AA-2-0-KA Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 2001

    2 01-0098-AA-2-0-KA Fort Myer Construction Corp. 2001

    3 00-0171-AA-2-0-KA Fort Myer Construction Corp. 3/7/2002

    4 01-0134-AA-2-0-KA Fort Myer Construction Corp. 3/14/2002

    5 02-0045-AA-2-0-KA Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 3/27/2002

    6 01-0157-AA-2-0-KA Fort Myer Construction Corp. 4/17/2002

    7 02-0037-AA-2-0-KA Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 4/18/2002

    8 02-0024-AA-2-0-KA Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 5/5/2002

    9 KA2004B0010JJ Fort Myer Construction Corp. 5/12/2004

    10 KA2003B0070JJ Civil Construction LLC 7/27/2004

    11 KA2004B0018JJ Civil Construction LLC 12/15/2004

    12 POKA2004B0026VH Fort Myer Construction Corp. 4/5/2005

    13 KA2003B0073JBW Civil Construction LLC 5/5/2005

    14 2003B0074FH Fort Myer Construction Corp. 5/26/2005

    15 KA2005B0016LS Fort Myer Construction Corp. 7/8/2005

    16 POKA-2004-B-0044-CR Fort Myer Construction Corp. 10/13/2005

    17 KA2005B002JJ Civil Construction LLC 1/24/2006

    18 KA2005B0015LS Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 4/5/2006

    19 KA2005B0030-FH Civil Construction LLC 4/19/2006

    119

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    21/91

    -6-

    20 2005B0019LS Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 7/10/2006

    21 KA2005B0044JJ Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 9/6/2006

    22 KA2005B0029LS Fort Myer Construction Corp. 10/3/2006

    23 KA2006B0008JJ Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 10/4/2006

    24 KA2004B0020CB Fort Myer Construction Corp. 10/17/2006

    25 KA2006B0002VH Fort Myer Construction Corp. 1/11/2007

    26 KA2006B0099JJ Fort Myer Construction Corp. 3/21/2007

    27 KA2006B0012JJ Fort Myer Construction Corp. 7/12/2007

    28 KA2007B0033 Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 7/20/2007

    29 POKA-2005-C-0031-CB Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 8/20/2007

    30 KA2006B0013 Anchor Construction Corp. 2/25/2008

    31 KA2007B0137 Civil Construction LLC 4/9/2008

    32 KA2007B0121 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 6/10/2008

    33 KA2008B0098 Civil Construction LLC 7/2/2008

    34 2008B0104 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 8/18/2008

    35 DCKA2009-B-0025 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 3/18/2009

    36 DCKA2009-B-0183 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 7/29/2009

    37 DCKA2008-B-0120 Civil Construction LLC 8/28/2009

    38 DCKA2009-B-0100 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 9/18/2009

    39 DCKA2009-B-0092 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 9/22/2009

    40 DCKA2009-B-0193

    120

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    22/91

    Exhibit K

    Table II-Criminal Violations by RICO enterprise

    121

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    23/91

    1

    Table 2 Criminal Violations by the RICO Enterprise

    Part 1 Signing of Non-Collusion Affidavits

    The Non-Collusion Affidavits, required and submitted with each Invitation for Bid (IFB), was a false document

    when signed by the construction company bidder, and its authorized signatory. If in fact as here (demonstrated

    by witness Gallardos testimony) collusion had occurred, then, the signing of the Affidavit would be a criminal

    violation under a District of Columbia law, likely qualifying as a criminal act of perjury and or/ uttering, along with

    criminal conspiracy in violation of the Sherman and Clayton Anti Trust Acts.

    The standard bidding procedures before signing the Non-Collusion Affidavit, as attested to by Gallardo, (book

    keeper for Hawks Enterprise whos salary was paid by an alleged competitor FMC Construction now Anchor

    Construction Corporation ) demonstrate the conspiracy process and the false swearing as a matter of continuing

    practice as follows:

    For about 15 years the RICO enterprise modus operand is described by a former insider, former insider, witness/

    prospective plaintiff, Juanita Q. Gallardo, as recorded in sworn statements caused to be transcribed by

    undersigned counsel.

    Gallardo's statements describe the standard procedure for bidding on contracts at the time she was the

    bookkeeper for one of the group of centralized accountants for the participants in each official bid. First the

    estimators for FMCC would develop bid numbers for all of the bidding participants. The numbers for bidding

    would be delivered to each companies office by Courier, the Couriers name was Antonio Bras. After Bras was

    incarcerated on a bribery charge, the new Courier was another person named Rodriguez. Next the individual

    bidders would prepare their individual bids with their coordinated plan set by Fort Myer Construction Company.

    (Ref. expected testimony of witness Gallardo).

    Once completed each bid would be submitted to the agency (DOT or DCWASA) in accordance with the procedures

    for that particular IFB. Part of the bidding documents was the inclusion of the Non-Collusion Affidavit under oath

    signed by each of the companiesrepresentatives.

    This table should be used in conjunction with Table 1, in that it alleges the fact of the criminal violations meetingthe requirement of two criminal acts within a ten year period of time 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1961 1A (5).

    The second column in the following table contains the Company or Name of the Individual who

    Plaintiffs allege have committed an alleged Criminal Act by signing and/or filing and or approving a

    false Non-Collusion Affidavit. (Plaintiffs submit that each false non-collusion affidavit filed with the

    District of Columbia bidding officials is a criminal violation involving perjury and or uttering and/or

    Common Law Fraud as well as a RICO enterprise act by each signatory of each such false non-collusion

    affidavit.) Accordingly, each bidder is listed following first by Individual and/or Company Name,

    associated with that particular invitation for bid (IFB). Accordingly, for each false IFB

    every person or Corporation participating in that deceptive sworn event has in fact performed a

    criminal act within the definitions of the Federal and State law as Ordered to be particularized by the

    Court.

    Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 101-10 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 7

    122

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    24/91

    2

    Violations

    (see Endnote No. 1 for

    applicable Statutory or

    Common Law definitions)

    Perjury and/or Utteringand/or Conspiracy in

    filling Non-Collusion Affidavits

    Item

    IFB Non Collusion

    Affidavit wasSubmitted

    Date, (onor about) Location

    SupportingExhibits

    1 Jose Rodriguez

    (NON-Collusion

    Affidavits) and

    (Gallardo

    Testimony)

    referenced

    immediately

    forgoing.

    2 IFB 080020 8/19/2008 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 12

    3 IFB 090080 3/24/2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 44 IFB 090020

    1 4/1/ 2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 7

    5 DCKA-2013-B-0029 3/18/2013 DOT Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 3

    6 Francis R. Neto

    7 IFB 080020 8/6/ 2008 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 13

    8 IFB 090080 3/ 25/2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 9

    9 IFB 090020 4/1/ 2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 5

    10 DCKA-2013-B-0029 3/18/2013 DOT Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 1

    11 Lewis Shrensky

    12 IFB 0800201 8/19/2008 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 10

    13 IFB 090020

    1

    4/1/ 2009DCWASA Bid Room DC

    Exhibit NC1, pg 714 IFB 090080

    1 3/25/2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 8

    15Fort Myer

    Construction Co.

    16 IFB 080020 8/19/2008 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 12

    17 IFB 09080 3/24/2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 4

    18 DCKA-2013-B-0029 3/18/2013 DOT Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 3

    19 Anchor Construction

    20 IFB 080020 8/ 6/2008 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 11

    21 IFB 090020 4/ 1/2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 6

    22 DCKA-2013-B-0029 3/15/2013 DOT Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 2

    23 Capitol Paving of DC

    24 IFB 080020 8/19/ 2008 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg

    25 IFB 090080 3/ 25/2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 9

    26 IFB 090020 4/1/2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 5

    27 DCKA-2013-B-0029 3/18/2013 DOT Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 1

    Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 101-10 Filed 03/09/15 Page 2 of 7

    123

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    25/91

    3

    28 Civil Construction LLC

    29 IFB 080020 8/18/ 2008 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 10

    30 IFB 090020 4/1/ 2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 7

    31 IFB 090080 3/ 25/2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 8

    32 DCKA-2009-B-O193 DOT Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg

    33

    34 Florentino Gregorio35 IFB 080020 8/ 6 2008 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 11

    36 DCKA-2013-B-0029 3/15/2013 DOT Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 2

    37 IFB 090020 4/ 1/ 2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 6

    38

    39 Cristina R. Gregorio,(Minton)

    40

    41 IFB 0800201 8/ 6 2008 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 11

    42 IFB 0900201 4/ 1/ 2009 DCWASA Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 6

    43 DCKA-2013-B-00291

    3/15/2013 DOT Bid Room DC Exhibit NC1, pg 2

    44

    45 Dora Rodriguez (Cooper)

    Notes

    1.

    This footnote indicates that the Chief Executive or Principal of this company did not sign this

    particular Non-Collusion Affidavit but was signed by a subordinate in the Corporation.

    Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 101-10 Filed 03/09/15 Page 3 of 7

    124

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    26/91

    4

    Table 2 Criminal Violations by the RICO Enterprise:

    Part 2 History of Contract Awards Table - Longevity

    The history of contract awards, from the Department of Transportation, indicate the longevity

    of the major construction companies in the RICO Enterprise

    No.Ref. Contract or IFB

    No. Company with Low Bid Est. Date

    1 01-0160-AA-2-0-KA Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 2001

    2 01-0098-AA-2-0-KA Fort Myer Construction Corp. 2001

    3 00-0171-AA-2-0-KA Fort Myer Construction Corp. 3/7/2002

    4 01-0134-AA-2-0-KA Fort Myer Construction Corp. 3/14/2002

    5 02-0045-AA-2-0-KA Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 3/27/2002

    6 01-0157-AA-2-0-KA Fort Myer Construction Corp. 4/17/2002

    7 02-0037-AA-2-0-KA Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 4/18/20028 02-0024-AA-2-0-KA Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 5/5/2002

    9 KA2004B0010JJ Fort Myer Construction Corp. 5/12/2004

    10 KA2003B0070JJ Civil Construction LLC 7/27/2004

    11 KA2004B0018JJ Civil Construction LLC 12/15/2004

    12 POKA2004B0026VH Fort Myer Construction Corp. 4/5/2005

    13 KA2003B0073JBW Civil Construction LLC 5/5/2005

    14 2003B0074FH Fort Myer Construction Corp. 5/26/2005

    15 KA2005B0016LS Fort Myer Construction Corp. 7/8/2005

    16 POKA-2004-B-0044-CR Fort Myer Construction Corp. 10/13/2005

    17 KA2005B002JJ Civil Construction LLC 1/24/2006

    18 KA2005B0015LS Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 4/5/2006

    19 KA2005B0030-FH Civil Construction LLC 4/19/2006

    20 2005B0019LS Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 7/10/2006

    21 KA2005B0044JJ Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 9/6/2006

    22 KA2005B0029LS Fort Myer Construction Corp. 10/3/2006

    23 KA2006B0008JJ Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 10/4/2006

    24 KA2004B0020CB Fort Myer Construction Corp. 10/17/2006

    25 KA2006B0002VH Fort Myer Construction Corp. 1/11/2007

    26 KA2006B0099JJ Fort Myer Construction Corp. 3/21/2007

    27 KA2006B0012JJ Fort Myer Construction Corp. 7/12/2007

    28 KA2007B0033 Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 7/20/2007

    29 POKA-2005-C-0031-CB Capitol Paving of D.C., Inc. 8/20/2007

    30 KA2006B0013 Anchor Construction Corp. 2/25/2008

    31 KA2007B0137 Civil Construction LLC 4/9/2008

    Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 101-10 Filed 03/09/15 Page 4 of 7

    125

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    27/91

    5

    32 KA2007B0121 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 6/10/2008

    33 KA2008B0098 Civil Construction LLC 7/2/2008

    34 2008B0104 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 8/18/2008

    35 DCKA2009-B-0025 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 3/18/2009

    36 DCKA2009-B-0183 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 7/29/2009

    37 DCKA2008-B-0120 Civil Construction LLC 8/28/2009

    38 DCKA2009-B-0100 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 9/18/2009

    39 DCKA2009-B-0092 Fort Myer Construction Corp. 9/22/2009

    Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 101-10 Filed 03/09/15 Page 5 of 7

    126

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    28/91

    6

    Table 2 Criminal Violations by the RICO Enterprise:

    Part 5 History of Bribery

    Violator Bribery Code:

    Florentino Gregorio Pleaded Guilty to bribing city

    inspectors

    2002 DC Washington Post

    Article

    Fort Myer Construction

    Co

    Fort Myer Construction Corp., which

    had received a three-year

    suspension in April, 2003 after two

    employees were convicted of bribing

    city highway inspectors

    2003 DC Washington Post

    Article

    Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 101-10 Filed 03/09/15 Page 6 of 7

    127

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    29/91

    7

    Table 2 Alleged Criminal Violations by the RICO Enterprise:

    Part 6 Violent Acts

    Violation Rico Violent Acts Violation:Item Defendant Document or Event Date, (on or

    about)

    Location Supporting Exhibit Comment

    1RICO

    Enterprise

    Vehicle Tampering: wheel fell off car Cheeks

    was driving from Control Arm Ball Joint.9/21/2012 Deanwood, DC

    Exhibit V1 PhotosExhibit V2 NHST Admin

    2Vehicle Tampering: wheel fell off car Cheeks

    was driving from Control Arm Ball Joint.

    Summer Fall

    2012 1110 6th

    St. NW,DCExhibit V1 Photos

    Exhibit V2 NHST Admin

    3Vehicle Tampering: wheel fell of bus Cheeks

    was driving. Bolts loosened.

    July- August

    2012 Penn. Ave NW, DCWitness:

    Wayne Greenwich

    4Vehicle Break in Cheeks was driving when

    parked.8/23/13 1111 6

    thSt NW, DC

    Exhibit P1 Police Rpt.

    5 Death Threat2/27/2010

    DuPont Circle, DC Exhibit P1 Police Rpt.

    NOTE: Evidence exists in the form of photographs and supporting testimony for all of the above.

    Case 1:14-cv-00914-RCL Document 101-10 Filed 03/09/15 Page 7 of 7

    128

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    30/91

    Exhibit L

    Table III Gallardo Sworn Statements-Excerpts

    129

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    31/91

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    __________________________________________

    )

    JOHN C. CHEEKS, et al )

    )

    Plaintiffs ) Case No. 14-CV-00914 (RCL)

    v. )FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION )

    CORPORATION, et al., )

    )

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    Table III. EXCERPTS-SWORN STATEMENTS OF GALLARDO

    According to Gallardo during her tenure at Hawk 2003-2005a period in which Fort

    Myer Construction Corporation (FMCC) was debarred from federally subsidized infrastructure

    contractsFMC Civil (Now Civil Construction Company-LLC) did collude with FMCC and the

    pooled companies at the Beaver Road location (i.e., Hawk, C&F Construction and DC Line, Inc.)

    to share equipment, resources and personnel, and to coordinate bids in unlawful subversion of the

    federal court debarment order and District of Columbia government statutes and rules.

    Upon being duly sworn, on April 9, 2012, the following [extracted] statements, inter-alia,

    representing attorneys work product were elicited from Gallardo in response to undersigned

    counsels questions:

    Charlton: So, I want you to reorient your story and tell us who is the boss and who

    are the subordinates, and how does it work.

    Gallardo: Fort Myer [FMCC] obviously is [at] the top, so to speak. From Fort

    Myer, five companies...operated kind of from the same money, which was DC

    -1-

    130

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    32/91

    Line, Hawk Enterprises, C&F Construction...[and] FMC Civil, which is now Civil

    Construction....FMC [Civil] changed their name because...of the debarment

    troubles that Fort Myer was having....

    Charlton: And how do you know that?

    Gallardo: Um, the articles of incorporation. When [I] originally came on board, it

    was around the time that the divorce was happening....

    Charlton: Who was separating?

    Gallardo: Uh, Florentino Gregorio [the current president of Anchor Construction

    Corporation, formerly C&F Construction, and then-husband of Cristina Rodrigues

    Gregorio] and Cristina [Gregorio] Rodrigues....They were separating the assets of

    the company [C&F Construction] at the time....Joe [Jose] Rodrigues needed to

    know what [accounts payable were] open [and] what receivables [were

    pending]...because basically he was the front...the big money....

    Charlton: Jose Rodrigues?

    Gallardo: Jose Rodrigues, yesthe part owner of Fort Myer Construction. Um, he

    needed to know where the companies all stood. So, we all had to do

    financials...for all the companies.

    Charlton: And you were privy to all that?

    Gallardo: Yes....[and, more], the chief estimators would meet with Mr. Rodriguesand the other superintendents from Fort Myer....Obviously they couldnt do it

    under Fort Myer, so...we needed to bid the work out...[and as to who was

    involved], FMC Civil. Most of those went to FMC Civil....

    -2-

    131

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    33/91

    Charlton: Okay. Now, what other companies were involved in this at that time?

    Gallardo: Uh, FMC [Civil] at the time, which is now Civil Construction, Hawk

    and Fort Myers estimators did our numbers for those bids.

    Charlton: So, Hawk turned in a bid; Fort Myer turned in a bid. Then they

    2collaborated together?

    Gallardo: Well, Fort Myer could not bid at that time. They were debarred,

    remember? They just did the leg work of the numbers and the estimating...

    Charlton: Okay. Well, who else turned in bids with Hawk?

    Gallardo: Uh, FMC [Civil]

    Charlton: So, Civil....Instead of the debarred company, they used Civil?

    Gallardo: Yes

    Charlton: Now, was there anybody else used?

    Gallardo: Yes. Hawk.

    Charlton: No, I mean anybody that you havent mentioned. For example, was

    Anchor in on this?

    Gallardo: C&F? Yes. C&F Construction bid the same. Yes....

    Charlton: Did you see the C&F people in the room at the same time, discussing

    the bid?

    Gallardo: Um, no. The courier....Uh, Fort Myer had a courier, and his route was to

    give us the same package....

    Charlton: So, the courier from Fort Myer picked up the stuff at Civil and delivered

    it to you?Gallardo: Yes. (Various pages, April 9, 2012 recorded transcript from tape

    recorded attorneys work product of that evening).

    -3-

    132

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    34/91

    EXHIBIT O

    Defendants Affil iation Matrix

    Capital

    Paving of DC Inc.* Ref

    Fort Myer Constructi on

    Corporation** Ref

    G&G, C&P Construct ion,

    Anch or Cons truct ion*** Ref FM - Civil Constru ction Ref

    Owner Jose Rodriguez SLBDC

    Pres Francisco R. Neto XTX 2007 Jose Rodrigues CA 1974 Florentino Gregorio

    VP Phuong Tran XTX 2007 Francisco Rodrigues Neto CA 1974

    Treas Francisco R. Neto XTX 2007 Lewis Shrensky CA 1974

    Sect Luis Neto XTX 2007 Lewis Shrensky CA 1974 Florentino GregorioV. Pres Christopher Kearns AI

    Incorp AI

    Incorp AI

    employee Dora Rodriguez (Minton)

    Board Francisco R. Neto XTX 2007 Jose Rodrigues CA 1974 Cristina Rodriguez Gregorio AI Lewis Shrensky MGR

    Board Francisco Rodrigues Neto CA 1974 Florentino Gregorio AI Jose Rodriguez

    Board Lewis Shrensky CA 1974 Dana B Stebbins AI Dora Rodriguez (Minton)

    Board Barbara Shrensky EXTax 19 Jose Rodriquez AI Lauren Shrensky

    Board Aurora Rodriguez Francisco Rodrigues Neto AI Jason Shrensky AI

    `

    Source:Articles of Incorporation and Public Tax Documents Filed with the District of Columbia Government

    * Relationships: Francisco Rodrigues Neto Relationships: Dora Rodriguez (Minton)

    i Jose Rodriguez - Brother to Francisco Rodrigues Neto Daughter of Jose and Aurora Rodriguez Board of Director, Civil and FMCC

    Sister of Cristina Rodriguez

    ** Relationships: Jose Rodriguez

    ii Francisco Rodrigues Neto Brother to Jose Rodrigues Relationships: Florentino Gregorio

    Former husband of Cristina Gregorio

    *** Relationships: Cristina R. Gregorioiii Daughter of Jose and Aurora Rodriguez Board of Director, Anchor Construction Corp

    iv Jose Rodriquez - Father of Christina R Gregorio

    v Francisco Rodrigues Neto - Uncle to Christina R. Gregorio

    Former Husband of Florentino Gregorio

    133

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    35/91

    Exhibit P-1

    Police Reports: Mercedes Break in and Threat at DuPont Circle

    134

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    36/91EXHIBIT P1, PG 001

    135

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    37/91EXHIBIT P1, PG 002

    136

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    38/91EXHIBIT P1, PG 003

    137

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    39/91EXHIBIT P1, PG 004

    138

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    40/91

    EXHIBIT S - 1

    Fort Myer

    Department of Small and Local Business

    Development Applications

    Excerpts

    139

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    41/91

    PrintReport

    Page 2 of 12

    Department

    of

    Small & Local Business Development

    CBE ANALYSIS REPORT

    r ~ i je n c e o f Ab-U-lty-ioQualify-'-NOT Q u a l i f Y - fo r ~ ~ - r t :W - ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ . s ~ 6 i . l ~ i e ~ G f i f _ a i g - I ~_ - - - . . .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - . . . . .- - - . . .

    j

    in c lu din g aU d o c um entat ion u se d to m ake de ten n ina ti on

    r

    L B E

    I--~~~~m's prin~:~IOffiCe is I ~ ~ : ; ~ ~ ; ; ~ ~ - : ; : : - ; -. . - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - . - _ - _ . , . - _ - . .

    i

    (check aUthat apply)

    1 s t : More than 50% of assets in DC excluding bank account

    L J More than 50% of employees are DC residents

    [}More than 50% of owners are DC residents

    L ? J More than 50% of total sales or other revenues are derived in DC

    List other supporting documents received

    (i.e., DC taxes, lease/deed, driver's license. utility bill, etc .. );

    A current DC Lease Amendment, Certificate of Occupancy for the current DC address, FY 2010

    &

    2009 DC SUB

    Corporation Business Franchise and FY 2010 & 2009 Federal S Corporation Tax Returns because September ends the

    company's fiscal year.

    ,

    I

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. ... .. .. _

    ..

    _ - - . _ _ . .

    '.

    _ - .. . . . . . ..

    -- - -

    _ . _ ,

    :

    i-=:---..,--------- - --------- ----.--- - -------.- ----.- -..---- -----....-..-----j

    . D B E

    i

    N/ A

    l----- ------- ------ ---------.------ -.. ---- -.----- --- ..---. .

    I

    ROB

    i

    j

    N'A

    ~

    j.. '''., ~ ~.''''~-~___t__-''''.

    ''''-.---~._u_----

    .m. _ ..... .,.__ _ ._. ,....

    v . _. . , . .. .

    .~_ __ ~ __ ._ . _ .___ __ .

    I OZ E

    I

    1\

    You are located in Enterprise and Empowerment Zone: 10-20% Poverty level- Census Tract 90.2

    2237 33RD STREET NE

    Documents of Qualifying Applicant:

    Phy s i c a l review o f lax rec o rd s an d bu s ine s s reqislratlone

    . .... .. . . .... . .. . . ... .. . '. _ v ._ _ . _ . v ~ ' i

    FY 1989 thru 2010 DC Corporation Business

    Franchise Tax Returns have a DC mailing and

    business address listed.

    of Continuous Years in DC

    39.00 yrs.

    From; 2 /14 /1974

    To 2 /812013

    verttication of Business RegistrationfLicense:

    OCR/>.

    Verification of Tax Filings:

    T

    &

    R

    Certificate of Good Standing

    .. i

    Taxes paid 21 years in DC From: i ; ; i 9 8 9

    L ._ . _ . j _ , . _ . _ . m .. . ' . .. . . _ .. . ._ . . ,_ _ ,_ .. ~ ~ ' . ., .. . , ._ , ~ . . . . _ ~ . .. _ .. . . ~w. , _ , _ h_ __ ~__

    i V O - S -

    I

    I N iA

    .--:-:-=---+ -------- ------- ----- - - ------ --- - --.-- ---.,--- ..--

    -

    LME I I

    ....._J_;o_it~_fi_I~:::~:~~_?~_c_~eCb ~:~:_:~_~_~_~_f~~~~::_~:~~:~sC~~:~~~~~~~a;~:I~_~~~:~::_ ..3~~~~d_d_re_s::~: __. .. .. l

    To:

    12/31/2010

    http://lsdbe,dslbd,dc,gov/application/Reports/ReportPage9,aspx

    EXH IB IT S

    1,

    PG 001

    2/J 5/2013

    140

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    42/91

    Printkeport

    Page 3 of12

    Department of Small & Local Business Development

    CBE ANALYSIS REPORT

    IdentifiCation

    of O v 7 n c r s - - - - . - - - - . - . .m Fort My~_::9D_~ ~uc~f.1_(;g:poration __ ..._ ..__ _ _........ ....- -.-.-- - ----- j

    Resident Owned Business (ROB) ~?~~~~y~~~Q(l~.B..~~lr~~ssJ?_BE) .._.__ ..

    I

    Owner Nam el Home Address : % Owned D C Resident Y/ N) . R~~~~'~=r~G'=-=en=d'~e=r=;=====P=e=rs=o 'na=I=N=~=\~=~o=rt='h=='--='='=..=....

    =...

    ...-- ..T-.-.-- ..- --- -c - ---- - .- - - -- - . .- .

    m---- ,...... --_ ,-_ - ..

    . . L

    51

    J _ . . ._ . , . . _ . . . . . . ..

    Hispanic

    Male

    N/A

    I

    49, N ,

    Caucasian ,Male

    N/A

    , o tornac 854-1317 i: : i

    1 _ , _ , , _ , _ ' _ _ _ _.

    _c .. ..-.- ----- - - -. .---- '

    IEvidence of the Ability to Qualify/Not Qualify for ROB or DBE (including documentation of residency & minority

    [status, review of driver's license, personal & business tax returns, stock certificates, personal

    i~ : '.~ .t1 -(;~:> .. : .lc .) _ . _ _ . . .. .. .. ._...

    I For ROB:

    N/A

    For DBE:

    N/A

    http://lsdbedslbd dc gov/application/Reports/ReportPage9aspxEXHIBITS1PG 002 2/15/2013

    141

  • 7/25/2019 Part 2 Pages 101-190 Cheeks v Fort Myer

    43/91

    PrintReport

    Page 8 of 12

    Department of Small & Local Business Development

    CBE ANALYSIS REPORT

    I nr