11
Synergies between future Landsat and European satellite missions for better understanding coupled human-environment systems Warren Cohen (USDA-FS), Patrick Griffiths (HU Berlin), Hermann Kaufmann (GFZ Potsdam, Germany), Robert Kennedy (Boston U), Pedro Leitão (HU Berlin), Volker Radeloff (U Madison), Achim Röder (U Trier, Germany), Ruth Sonnenschein (EURAC, Bolzano, Italy), Thomas Udelhoven (U Trier, Germany), Sebastian van der Linden (HU Berlin), Björn Waske (U Bonn, Germany) Patrick Hostert Tobias Kuemmerle Dirk Pflugmacher Landsat Science Team Meeting, Buellton, February 10-14, 2013

Patrick Hostert Tobias Kuemmerle Dirk Pflugmacher

  • Upload
    tamah

  • View
    55

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Synergies between future Landsat and European satellite missions for better understanding coupled human-environment systems. Patrick Hostert Tobias Kuemmerle Dirk Pflugmacher. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

Synergies between future Landsat and European satellite missions forbetter understanding coupledhuman-environment systems

Warren Cohen (USDA-FS), Patrick Griffiths (HU Berlin), Hermann Kaufmann (GFZ Potsdam, Germany), Robert Kennedy (Boston U), Pedro

Leitão (HU Berlin), Volker Radeloff (U Madison), Achim Röder(U Trier, Germany), Ruth Sonnenschein (EURAC, Bolzano, Italy), Thomas

Udelhoven (U Trier, Germany), Sebastian van der Linden(HU Berlin), Björn Waske (U Bonn, Germany)

Patrick HostertTobias KuemmerleDirk Pflugmacher

Landsat Science Team Meeting, Buellton, February 10-14, 2013

Page 2: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

2

Overall goals

Exploring dense and long time series Creating Landsat-based products across large areas Integrating Landsat with future Sentinel-2 and EnMAP data Central and Eastern Europe, SE-Asia, S-America

Page 3: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

3

December 2012 – February 2013

Testing Landsat-based time series analysis with yearly data and based on the full archive depth (since TM)

Focus on the Carpathian Mountains of Eastern Europe: LULCC mapping and development of LU intensity metrics

Focus on SE-Asia: improved forest degradation mapping for REDD+ Focus on Brazil: understanding pasture/cropping dynamics in

Amazonia and their implications for carbon fluxes

Page 4: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

4USGS INPE

Data transfer INPE - USGS

Page 5: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

5USGS INPE

Data transfer INPE - USGS

Page 6: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

6USGS INPE

Data transfer INPE - USGS

Page 7: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

7USGS INPE

Data transfer INPE - USGS

Page 8: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

8

150 Images Stack – Single Pixel Profiles

Intensive Pasture

Understanding pasture dynamics from deep time series

Page 9: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

9

150 Images Stack – Single Pixel Profiles

Intensified Pasture

Understanding pasture dynamics from deep time series

Page 10: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

10

150 Images Stack – Single Pixel Profiles

Extensified Pasture

Understanding pasture dynamics from deep time series

Page 11: Patrick  Hostert Tobias  Kuemmerle Dirk  Pflugmacher

11

Arising questions, remaining problems

How error-prone are some of the “traditional” analysis results in highly dynamic environments?

How reliable are business-as-usual scenarios / baselines e.g. for REDD+ based on “snapshots”?

What does that mean for quantifying “additionality” estimates?

We need better haze and smoke flagging in the wet tropics. Deriving reliable and transferable metrics from deep time series in

highly dynamic environments is challenging.