Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
As we move into the summer months the PCDS Committee is ever more busy with
current and future meetings. The desire to provide a relevant and interesting variety
of topics and presenters is an ongoing task for which we rely on feedback from
members attending meetings. The evaluation forms we use are studied and where
possible acted upon. We do have difficulty sometimes reconciling those who want
weekdays and others wanting weekends but we try, even then, to provide both at
different times of year and at different venues.
You may have noticed the summer meeting takes place over Friday/Saturday this
year and this is mainly because hotels large enough for us now expect us to book the
same number of bedrooms on Friday if we want Saturday nights. Weddings (not
necessarily royal) being the problem competitor. We would very much like to hear
from those members not attending meetings to contact us and let us know what
might tempt you. Let us know what you want, where and what days you might
prefer.
The first few Essential Dermatology (ED) day courses have been very popular and we
are indebted to members all around the country who have passed on contact
addresses of VTS organisers and commissioners and who have sent out flyers for us.
Not only are we grateful for the help but also for the increased communication with
our membership which we all appreciate especially Carol, our administrator.
Primary Care Dermatology Society Summer 2011
Bulletinpcds.org.uk
Chairman’s Report
The PCDS Trustee Committee
Mr Peter Lapsley Dr Tom PoynerDr Stephen Hayes Dr Jane Rakowski
Dermol knocks out Staph...
…and soothesitchy eczema
The Dermol family of antimicrobialemollients – for patients of all ages who suffer from dry and itchy skin conditions such as atopiceczema/dermatitis.
• Specially formulated to be effective and acceptable on sensitive eczema skin
• Significant antimicrobial activity against MRSA and FRSA (fusidic acid-resistantStaphylococcus aureus)1
• Over 10 million packs used by satisfied patients2
Dermol® 200 Shower Emollient andDermol® 500 Lotion Benzalkonium chloride0.1%, chlorhexidine dihydrochloride 0.1%,liquid paraffin 2.5%, isopropyl myristate2.5%. Dermol® Cream Benzalkoniumchloride 0.1%, chlorhexidine dihydrochloride0.1%, liquid paraffin 10%, isopropylmyristate 10%.Uses: Antimicrobial emollients for the management of dry andpruritic skin conditions, especially eczema and dermatitis, and foruse as soap substitutes. Directions: Adults, children and theelderly: Apply direct to the skin or use as soap substitutes.
Dermol® 600 Bath Emollient Benzalkoniumchloride 0.5%, liquid paraffin 25%, isopropylmyristate 25%.Uses: Antimicrobial bath emollient for the management of dry,scaly and/or pruritic skin conditions, especially eczema anddermatitis. Directions: Adults, children and the elderly: Add to a bath of warm water. Soak and pat dry.
Contra-indications, warnings, side-effects etc: Please refer toSPC for full details before prescribing. Do not use if sensitive toany of the ingredients. In the unlikely event of a reaction stoptreatment. Keep away from the eyes. Take care not to slip in thebath or shower. Package quantities, NHS prices and MAnumbers: Dermol 200 Shower Emollient: 200ml shower pack£3.55, PL00173/0156. Dermol 500 Lotion: 500ml pump dispenser£6.03, PL00173/0051. Dermol Cream: 100g tube £2.86, 500gpump dispenser £6.63, PL00173/0171. Dermol 600 Bath
Emollient: 600ml bottle £7.55, PL00173/0155. Legal category: PMA holder: Dermal Laboratories, Tatmore Place, Gosmore,Hitchin, Herts, SG4 7QR. Date of preparation: January 2010.
References:1. Gallagher J. Rosher P. Temple S. Dixon A. Routine infection
control using a proprietary range of combined antisepticemollients and soap substitutes – their effectiveness againstMRSA and FRSA. Presented as a poster at the 18th Congress ofthe EADV in October 2009, Berlin.
2. Dermol Range – Total Unit Sales since launch. DermalLaboratories Ltd. Data on file.
Adverse events should be reported. Reportingforms and information can be found atwww.yellowcard.gov.uk. Adverse events shouldalso be reported to Dermal.
www.dermal.co.uk
2
Please continue to advertise our meetings to
your colleagues. The main aim of the Society is
to educate GPs in dermatology at all levels. A
special bonus of the ED meetings is the
excellent memory stick (I can say that because I
had only a very small part in its production) which
not only has all the presentations but a wealth of
educational matter including a dermoscopy
starter course which makes it worth the £75
course fee on its own!
Some time ago I asked by email for future QOF
suggestions, albeit at rather short notice. The
response was varied but of the 20 or so replies
the overwhelming response was not to submit
anything! The cynicism of QOF-weary GPs held
sway at this time! I did as suggested but the
BAD did submit quite a selection for
consideration. These included, people with
chronic skin disease should be reviewed annually
and offered a second opinion from an
appropriately trained practitioner in dermatology;
GPs to have a specified number of hours
teaching in skin cancer; reduce mortality due to
the co-morbidities of skin disease; ensure the
quality of GP training for people with skin
disease and people should be treated by the
right person, right place first time. I would not
argue with any of these aims and it is significant
that the wording has changed over the last year
or so to use terms such as “appropriately trained
practitioner” which could include GPs or nurses
rather than the previously ubiquitous
“Dermatologist.”
If you have not looked at the PCDS website
recently I recommend that you give it a look
since there have been many additions and it is
becoming an extremely useful reference site as
well as a low stress teaching aid for registrars
etc. I hear from trainers that it is a great resource
and free!
I look forward to meeting more of you at any, or
all, of our meetings in 2011 and beyond.
Stephen Kownacki
Executive Chair
Our annual meeting of the Primary Care Dermatology Society of Ireland goes
from strength to strength. This year’s meeting was held in Galway on March
4th/5th and was attended by over 200 delegates. A crowded programme,
spread over the 2 days, had something for everybody. Some sessions ran
concurrently to cater for varying levels of dermatology knowledge and
experience among the delegates. Areas covered in depth this year included
atopic eczema, psoriasis, dermatology problems in special groups and
paediatric dermatology.
PCDS members who made very well received presentations were Liz
Ogden, Stephen Hayes and Iain Henderson. We had a great turn out from
our sponsors from the pharmaceutical industry, without whose support the
meeting could not go ahead. Great thanks is due to them all. Leo Pharma
sponsored our gala dinner on Friday night.
Our next meeting is a full day of dermoscopy training with Dr Jonathan
Bowling and Dr Tony Downs on Friday 16th September 2011, at The Royal
College of Physicians, Dublin. With two such experienced and proven
teachers we expect a big turnout of delegates on the day.
Dermatology has done well in the HSE clinical care programme. The aim of
the programme is to deliver timely, effective and appropriate care of a range
of chronic conditions. In Munster we have only had 5 dermatologists in the
public hospital system. This is about to more than double with the
appointment of 2 extra consultants to each of Cork and Limerick, with a
further 2 eventually for Waterford. This should bring about a much delayed,
but badly needed improvement in patient access to specialist care. As the
primary care clinical lead for dermatology I hope to promote and highlight the
essential role general practitioners play in providing dermatology care in the
community. Unfortunately no new funds whatsoever have come the primary
care way though we have been promised we are next in line (but with that
awful provision “should funding allow”). The programme in dermatology has
set a target of reducing referrals from primary care by 10%. It is hoped to
achieve this by developing care pathways for the common chronic,
inflammatory rashes, such as acne, psoriasis and eczema. It is also hoped to
reduce the rate of lesions referred to secondary care. Without extra
resourcing it is difficult to see how this is to be advanced. We live in hope.
Our annual meeting next year will be on the 24th/25th February 2012. The
venue has yet to be finalised. Options being explored are Croke Park, Dublin
and Killarney. Why not put this date in your diary for next year.
Dr Johnny Loughnane
News From Ireland
Editorial Summer 2011
Wow – summer has arrived very early this year. I’m still
catching up after a tropical Easter in Sheffield and two
lovely long weekends. I’m very excited as I have the
opportunity to attend Glastonbury this year. I will be
helping some colleagues from Exeter and the South West in
the “mole watch” tent. Being very new to festivals and having
very little knowledge of trendy new bands I would like any
advice that you have to offer. This includes advice on who to
watch, camping gear, avoiding the mud and any appropriate
fashion tips.
I recently found there were a few perks to being Editor of the
Bulletin. I have been sent a book to review for members of the
PCDS.
Acute Adult Dermatology,
Diagnosis and Management by
Daniel Creamer, Jonathan Barker
and Francisco Kerdel.
This book was published by
Manson Publishing £29.95.
I really liked this book. It’s good
value and pitched at a level that
would suit GPs with an interest
in dermatology and
dermatology trainees. The information
was presented in a clear and concise way. There were
excellent clinical photos illustrating each disease. The diseases
are broken down into clinical features, differential diagnoses,
4 5
complications and investigations. The
treatment is then broken down into
immediate and long term management.
It covers a wide variety of dermatology
and also covers some tropical
dermatoses. It would be an invaluable
resource to have in your top drawer to
use as a quick reference. The publishers
have offered 15% discount for members
of the PCDS. If you wish to take
advantage of this, please contact me via
pcds.org.uk.
Acne Academy
This is an excellent new online resource
developed by a group of dermatologists,
Stephen Kownacki as a GP with a
special interest, a pharmacist and nurse
specialist to provide information to both
patients and health care professionals.
It provides access to balanced practical
information about acne, advice on self
management and where to seek help. It
is a valuable resource for patients and
their families and well worth directing
them to the website.
For health care professionals there are
links to other useful resources and also
recent updates on treatment guidance and relevant up to date research.
http://www.acneacademy.org/
New Guidance on prescribing antibiotics with combinedhormonal contraception
The Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare have recently updated their 2005
guidance on drug interactions with hormonal contraception1. This obviously affects the
advice given when prescribing oral antibiotics for a wide variety of dermatological
conditions.
There is no longer the need to advise that additional precautions are required when
using combined hormonal contraception (CHC) with antibiotics that are not enzyme
inducers. This includes both short and prolonged courses of oral antibiotics.
Rifampicin-like drugs (e.g. rifampicin, rifabutin) are the only antibiotics that are enzyme
inducers and that have consistently been shown to reduce serum levels of
ethinylestradiol. Rifampicin is used in conditions such as cutaneous TB infections,
hydradenitis suppuritiva and folliculitis decalvans. The advice given in such cases
would be to use a form of contraception that is not affected by enzyme inducing drugs
such as the mirena coil or depo provera. This advice is directly in line with guidance
from the World Health Organisation
(WHO2) and the US Medical Eligibility
Criteria for contraceptive use3.
The Faculty admits adopting a cautious
approach in the past despite the lack of
evidence supporting a causal relationship
between antibiotics that are not enzyme
inducers and reduced COC efficacy. The
revised guidance is based on direct
evidence from clinical trials and also
indirect supporting evidence.
This will obviously change the way that
we have traditionally practiced both in
dermatology and general practice over
(for some of us) many years. I thoroughly
recommend that you read the guidance
and for those interested review the
evidence.Helen Frow
References1. http://www.ffprhc.org.uk/Default2.asp?Section=Publications&SubSection=ClinicalGuidance2
2. World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (3rd edn). 2010
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9789241563888/en/index.html
3. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010. 2010.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr59e0528.pdf
6 7
Understanding the Histology Report: Part Two – Inflammatory Dermatoses
Introduction
Most histopathologists find the diagnosis of inflammatory
dermatoses more challenging than that of skin tumours and
their difficulty may be reflected in the histology report. There are
reasons for this.
The skin has a relatively limited number of ways in which it can
react to injury, and this is reflected in histological similarities
between conditions that may, clinically, be completely unrelated.
In many cases the histological features of inflammatory skin
biopsies may just be non-specific.
Clinicopathological correlation is essential if the correct
diagnosis is to be achieved. The request form needs to show
the patient’s age, along with the distribution, gross appearance
and treatment history (topical steroids, for example, can modify
features). The duration of the lesion or rash is important, as the
histology of an inflammatory dermatosis can change as it
evolves. Most importantly, a clinical differential diagnosis should
be given on the request form. The return on any “hopeful”,
blind biopsy is low!
To help reach a diagnosis, pathologists have developed an
approach to inflammatory skin biopsies using pattern analysis -
recognizing a major pattern to the inflammatory process,
allowing classification of it into one of several groups, and then
refining the diagnosis using more subtle details. The late
Bernard Ackermann was one of the first to use this method,
which he documented in a textbook1 that includes a series of
very detailed algorithms. The most recent version of this
publication can be found online2. David Weedon has provided an
alternative approach3, and his is widely used in the UK.
Weedon describes several major tissue reaction patterns (Figure
1), and a few minor ones specific to just a small number of
conditions. Identifying the tissue reaction pattern, and combining
it with the distribution or pattern of inflammation in the dermis
and subcutis (Figure 2), provides a simple algorithmic approach
that can guide the pathologist towards the correct diagnosis.
Below, I describe Weedon’s major tissue reaction patterns, and
include some details about common diagnoses in those
categories. I have attempted to explain some of the histological
terms you might come across in the histology report.
The Major Tissue Reaction Patterns
1. The lichenoid reaction pattern (“interface dermatitis”)
The essential feature in lichenoid conditions is damage to the
cells at the base of the epidermis, where the epidermis
“interfaces” with the underlying dermis. Lichen planus (LP) and
discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) are good examples from
the two main groups of lichenoid conditions.
In LP, cell damage and death is mostly via apoptosis, a type of
individual cell necrosis often called “programmed cell death”,
and a result of attack by T lymphocytes. Apoptosis gives rise to
the so-called Civatte or colloid bodies, which are necrotic
remnants of keratinocytes (epidermal cells). The repeated
damage and loss of the basal cells in LP nibbles away at the
normal rounded outline of the basal epidermis such that it
becomes more angular (“saw-toothing”). In DLE, vacuolar
(hydropic) change predominates. This appears as vacuoles or
spaces around the injured basal keratinocytes.
The dermal inflammatory infiltrate in LP consists mainly of
lymphocytes, is relatively heavy and superficial, and so is
described as “band-like”. DLE has a much lighter infiltrate and
also involves skin appendages.
2. The psoriasiform reaction pattern
This is a type of epidermal hyperplasia in which there is a regular
pattern of elongation of the epidermis (specifically of the rete
ridges).
Psoriasis is the archetypal example. Other clues to a diagnosis
of psoriasis include thinning of the suprapapillary plate, the strip
of epidermis lying over the top of the papillary dermis, and the
presence of prominent neutrophils (acute inflammatory cells).
Neutrophils can give rise to subcorneal abscesses (of Munro)
and the so-called “squirting papillae”, areas where they are
seen passing through the epidermis from the blood vessels in
the papillary dermis below.
Lichen Simplex chronicus is another psoriasiform dermatosis.
Here the hyperplasia is less regular, lymphocytes rather than
neutrophils predominate and the suprapapillary plate is thicker.
Bowen’s disease can be psoriasiform but marked keratinocyte
atypia is present.
3. The spongiotic reaction pattern
Spongiosis is the presence of fluid between keratinocytes, and
when florid can cause microvesicle formation. It is seen in a
variety of conditions including atopic or allergic dermatitis -
eczema means "to bubble up".
A feature often seen with spongiosis is exocytosis, the
presence of leucocytes (white blood cells) in the epidermis,
usually lymphocytes. Other features help narrow the diagnosis,
such as the presence of numerous eosinophils in an allergic
dermatitis. In long-standing cases of eczema, the prolonged
scratching can cause superimposed lichen simplex chronicus
(see above).
4. The vesiculobullous reaction pattern
Vesicles and bullae can occur in a variety of conditions such as
eczema and lichen planus, but this reaction pattern includes
those where they are a primary feature. Classification is by a
Fig 1: Lichen planus with band-like inflammation and“saw-toothing”. Inset shows Civatte bodies (onearrowed)
Fig 2: The regular epidermal hyperplasia of psoriasis Fig 3: Epidermal vesicle formation (between arrows)in a case pemphigus
Dr Jason DaviesConsultant Histopathologist, North Devon District Hospital, Barnstaple
Lichenoid (‘interface dermatitis’)
Psoriasiform
Spongiotic
Vesiculobullous
Granulomatous
Vasculopathic
Combined
Superficial perivascular inflammation
Superficial and deep dermal inflammation
Folliculitis and perifolliculitis
Panniculitis
Table 1: Major tissue reaction patterns
Table 2: Patterns of inflammation
8
combination of light microscopy (LM) and immunofluorescence
(IMF).
The LM feature of most value is the level where the
vesicle/bulla forms, either intra-epidermal, or sub-epidermal,
the latter in the vicinity of the basement membrane on which
the epidermis sits. The type of associated inflammatory cell
helps to refine the diagnosis. Intra-epidermal blistering
dermatoses include the various types of pemphigus and
Grover’s and Darier’s diseases. The commonest sub-epidermal
dermatosis is bullous pemphigoid and prominent eosinophils
are a distinguishing feature.
IMF is important in diagnosis but needs to be performed on
fresh tissue – hence the need for special transport media. For
example, the LM features of dermatitis herpetiformis and
linear IgA disease can be identical. However, IMF allows their
separation, showing a linear band of IgA staining along the
lower epidermis in the latter, whilst DH has patchy, granular
IgA deposits in the papillary dermis.
5. The granulomatous reaction pattern
Granulomata are aggregates of histiocytes (macrophages) and
these cells can fuse to form giant cells. There are several types
of Granulomata. They can be “naked”, meaning they lack a
significant lymphocyte rim, as in sarcoidosis, they can be
“caseating” (showing central necrosis) as in tuberculosis,
whilst some infective processes, including fungal infections,
can give rise to suppurative granulomata, rich in neutrophils.
Prominent giant cells are a clue to foreign body granulomas,
and the causative foreign material may be detected using a
polarising attachment on the microscope. Finally, in palisaded
granulomata the histiocytes line up in orderly fashion around
the periphery. This is characteristic of granuloma annulare and
rheumatoid nodules.
6. The vasculopathic reaction pattern
The classification of vasculitis is beyond the scope of this
article, but involves vessels of varying sizes and locations.
Ancillary tests such as serology are required in many, but some
are biopsied. Any biopsy for suspected vasculitis should
include subcutaneous tissue, to ensure sampling of
medium-sized vessels as would be involved in polyarteritis
nodosa.
A diagnosis of vasculitis necessitates identifying primary injury
to vascular spaces. Damage can cause swelling of endothelial
cells (which line the interior of vessels), vessel wall necrosis,
and leakage of red cells into the surrounding dermis
(erythrocyte extravasation).
The histological appearances can be very difficult to separate
from the secondary vessel damage that occurs at the edges of
non-specific ulcers. In such cases the histopathologist will
examine vessels away from the ulcer’s vicinity.
Leucocytoclastic (hypersensitivity) vasculitis is probably the
most frequently biopsied. This involves small venules in the
superficial dermis. Histologically there is bright red fibrinoid
necrosis in the vessel wall and a florid surrounding infiltrate of
neutrophils and fragmented nuclear debris from degenerate
neutrophils, termed leukocytoclasis.
7. Combined reaction patterns
Mixed patterns can occur. For example, some drug reactions
can be both spongiotic and lichenoid, and there are
granulomatous forms of vasculitis (eg Wegener’s).
Conclusion
Inflammatory skin biopsy diagnosis can be difficult, but with a
combined clinical and histopathological approach, most cases
can be resolved. The MDT meeting can be an effective forum
to discuss problematic biopsies.
I hope that in these two short articles I have helped increase
your understanding of some aspects of histopathology reports.
However, dermatopathology is an extensive subject and I have
only been able to cover a small area. If you have a report that
you just don’t understand then contact your histopathologist –
most are approachable!
References1. Ackerman AB. Histological diagnosis of inflammatory skin diseases. Lea andFebiger. 1978
2. http://www.derm101.com
3. Weedon D. Skin pathology. 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone. 2009.
Fig 4: Tuberculous granuloma of skin with central, caseous necrosis (arrow)
ANTHELIOS XLMELT-IN CREAM SPF50+ PPD 42
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Suitable for:
Nowavailable onprescription
MELT-IN CREAM SPF50+ INGREDIENTS – C28936/1 : AQUA / WATER • C12-15 ALKYL BENZOATE • GLYCERIN • ETHYLHEXYL SALICYLATE • TITANIUM DIOXIDE • BUTYL METHOXYDIBENZOYLMETHANE • BIS-ETHYLHEXYLOXYPHENOL METHOXYPHENYL TRIAZINE • ALCOHOL DENAT. • PENTYLENE GLYCOL • OCTOCRYLENE • CYCLOPENTASILOXANE • STEARIC ACID • POTASSIUM CETYL PHOSPHATE • DIMETHICONE • METHYL METHACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMER • MYRISTYL MYRISTATE • NYLON-12 • PETROLATUM • ETHYLHEXYL TRIAZONE • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE • AMMONIUM POLYACRYLDIMETHYLTAURAMIDE / AMMONIUM POLYACRYLOYLDIMETHYL TAURATE • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL • CASSIA ALATA LEAF EXTRACT • DISODIUM EDTA • DROMETRIZOLE TRISILOXANE • GLYCERYL STEARATE • HYDROXYPROPYL METHYLCELLULOSE • MALTODEXTRIN • PEG-100 STEARATE • PHENOXYETHANOL • STEARYL ALCOHOL • TEREPHTHALYLIDENE DICAMPHOR SULFONIC ACID • TOCOPHEROL • TRIETHANOLAMINE
www.laroche-posay.co.uk
THE HIGHEST UV
ANTHELIOS XL MEL
THE HIGHEST UV
ANTHELIOS XL MEL
A AND UVB V VA AND UVB PRO
T-IN CREA L LT-IN CREAM SPF50+
TIONTECA AND UVB PRO
T-IN CREAM SPF50+
TIONnprescriptio
available onwNo
T-IN CREAM SPF50+
T-IN CR MELLT-IN CREAM SPF50+ ANTHELIOS XL
than the EurSPF 50+ / PPD 42: UV>
T-IN CREAM SPF50+ ANTHELIOS XL
ommendationecopean rthan the Eurection higher otA pr PPD 42: UV VA pr
42PPD
ommendationection higher
aben-frarP>
e-francagrrF>
esiser-ratW>
abltosPhot>
eeaben-fr
eee-fr
anttesis
ectionotA+UVB pre UV VA+UVB prabl
ection
ection of skin frotPror:e fablSuit
ed filtentatP>
ogicoldermate tancerolT>
adiation in abnormalUV romection of skin fr
em MEXtering sysed filt
olontral cogiced under tese t
adiation in abnormal
®OPLEXem MEX
onicadiation, chrrodermatphotor
aneous photcutection of skin frotPr
ent herpes labialis.ecurror ronicoses, including thoseodermat
o genetic disortosensitivity dueaneous photadiation in abnormalUV romection of skin fr
ent herpes labialis.esulting frroses, including those
deo genetic disoradiation in abnormal
10 11
Being a relative newcomer to the PCDS and not knowing
any of my fellow delegates, I walked into the Grand Hyatt
Hotel with some trepidation on Friday 13th. When we first
met in the library over a glass of wine and delicious canapés, my
trepidation totally melted away and the warm friendship of the
PCDS shone through and I soon felt that this was going to be a
good weekend and the educational part had not yet started.
Bright and early on the Saturday morning Childhood Eczema
was on the menu, with a lecture by Dr Sue Lewis-Jones with an
overview of the treatment of some of those difficult to treat
eczematous rashes. The use of patch testing for allergens, Oral
Allergy Syndrome, emollient usage and the use of calcineurin
inhibitors in children was discussed. This was followed up by a
lecture on the Eczema Education Programme in Germany by Dr
Sylke Gellrich, a Community Dermatologist with the Charité
Medical Facility in Berlin. It certainly impressed on me that the
key to treating eczema at all ages is ’education, education,
education’ and how well patients respond to an education
scheme. It also impressed us that Dr Gellrich, whose native
language is obviously not English; was able to deliver an
excellent lecture in English despite this.
Changing the tact somewhat, Dr Stephen Jones, Consultant
Dermatologist in the Wirrall and President of BAD helped iron
Friday 13th May – Sunday 15th May 2011
out a lot of the indecisions regarding the diagnosis of
Connective Tissue Disorders. Some of the tips given included
the fact that the rash on the hands related to Dermatomyositis
occurs mainly over the dorsal interphalangeal joints whereas
the similar rash in SLE occurs between the joints leaving the
joints somewhat spared. The continuum between DLE and
SLE was explained as well as many other gems of information.
The final act of the Saturday morning was a very energetic
lecture by Professor Eggert Stockfleth, Consultant
Dermatologist at Charité Medical Faculty. His lecture on Skin
Cancers and Actinic Keratoses was very interesting from the
point of view of the differences in the aggression of treatment
of AK’s in Germany compared to this country. Some of this
may be as a result of the fact that the city of Berlin has almost
as many dermatologists as the whole of the United Kingdom.
The burden of skin cancers is increasing throughout the world
not only because of the depletion of the ozone layers but also
because of the amount of immunosuppression, both natural
and iatrogenic. Are we building a new as yet unknown
population suffering from cancers from the use of the biologic
medications? – Probably!!
That’s enough of the academic stuff for the first day. It was
now time for a lesson in the exceptionally interesting history of
Berlin. The bus tour around the city filled the afternoon and
covered all the well-known sites such as the Reichstag, the
Brandenburg Gate, the Holocaust Memorial, the remains of the
Berlin Wall and Checkpoint Charlie. Some of us apparently saw
Yusuf Islam aka Cat Stevens from the coach. Some even tried
to climb the remnants of the wall. Someone should have told
them they could have walked around it in this day and age!
Later in the evening we were taken for a meal at the Altes
Zollhaus where we had the conference dinner and another
chance to meet and talk to our colleagues from all over the
country. One of the things about putting a group of GP’s
together is that you always find someone in the group who
knows something that you don’t know anything about but
would like to. I suppose that’s one of the advantages about
being a generalist.
The next morning Dr Sue Lewis-Jones lectured about her
experiences in advising the Ethiopian dermatologists on setting
up their dermatology service. There was an awful lot of
pathology on show including leprosy, leishmaniasis and even
boring old eczema! Dr Lewis-Jones gave a very good
explanation of the various types of leprosy and their treatment
as well as enlightening us about the vast numbers of patients
seen in a day in the local hospital.
It was then time for some more Berliner expertise in the form
of Dr Sandra Phillip of the Charité University Medical Centre.
Her subject was Psoriasis and its Comorbidities. She produced
compelling evidence to suggest that those patients with
moderate to severe psoriasis should be screened for metabolic
syndrome and given the appropriate advice regarding weight,
smoking and exercise. This is in addition to psoriasis’ well
known rheumatological and gastroenterological co-morbidities.
This is something that will more than likely change my view on
these patients in the future. Talking of the future, we next
went into the past with a very entertaining lecture by Dr Ralf
Hartmann of the Bundeswehr Krankenhaus, Berlin entitled
‘Dermatology – What has changed in the Past 20 years?‘ The
lecture was extremely amusing in parts with a lot of references
to the fact that in the US dermatologists are ‘Beauty Surgeons’
and do not to deal with the important pathological dermatology.
The final lecture was presented by Dr Stephen Jones who
showed us a number of interesting cases, including a case of
Dermatitis Artefacta where the patient self-harmed the skin to
such an extent that he frequently required hospital admission.
This was finally resolved by telling the patient that he could
come into hospital when he had no more lesions. This led to a
marked reduction in his self-harming pattern. What an amazing
effect the mind has over pathological processes and how
problems can be solved with a little lateral thinking.
After our lunch we all gradually departed to the various corners
of the United Kingdom having been well fed, watered and
rested and definitely better educated in Dermatology, the
German Dermatology Service and the History of Berlin.
Personally, I would strongly recommend the PCDS to arrange
further similar conferences in other parts of Europe on a
regular basis.
Richard Lonsdale
PCDS 2nd European Meeting:Grand Hyatt Hotel, Berlin
12 13
Sewing with Christy
My last article covered all the basics of local anaesthesia
including administration, equipment and a few personal
tips. In this article I will describe two of the most common
methods of administration, ‘field block’ and ‘nerve block’.
Firstly, the most conventional method is the “field block“, this
is used because in most cases of removal of skin lesions, there
is no clear cut single nerve supply to the target area involved.
Mark out the contour of the lesion to be excised with a surgical
marker (conventional ball point pen can tattoo the skin
permanently!) then plan your excision skin margin and draw this
as well. Wherever possible this should be a 4 mm margin for
BCCs, 6mm margin for SCCs and 2mm margin for lesions of
uncertain diagnosis. If the lesion is not marked prior to injecting
the local, the definition of the lesion could easily be lost to the
eye once the area is swollen and blanched by the local
anaesthetic. The field block should cover at least 5mm beyond
the area marked out for excision as your sutures will be placed
about 2–4mm from the edges of the wound. When using the
vertical mattress suturing technique to close the cavity (surgical
dead space), a wider area needs to be anaesthetised as the
furthest entry and exit point of the suture will be placed at the
outer borders of the cavity left behind.
For the field block technique, insert the needle into the skin
and advance forward to the furthest point which needs to be
anaesthetised. A 27 gauge ophthalmic needle is very useful
here as it is flexible with a long barrel and narrow gauge
(Sterican 27G x40mm length needle made by Braun. Bottom
right needle on diagram 1). Since this needle has a small
gauge, it is much easier and quicker to draw the anaesthetic
with a standard green needle from the bottle, then use the
Sterican needle to inject. Always inject slowly and withdrawing
at the same time. The continuous movement of the needle
ensures that even if the anaesthetic is inadvertently injected
into a blood vessel, only a small amount of local will be placed
into the circulation.
When rapid anaesthesia is required, inject intra-dermally,
however, be aware that this can be very painful. When a shave
excision is planned, the injection is placed superficially at a 15
degree angle with the bevel facing upwards ,the skin becomes
raised and blanched. This will lift the target lesion off the skin
surface and make it lot easier to shave with either a size 10
blade or curette.
When injecting into the subcutaneous layer of the skin at a 45
degree angle the technique is a lot less painful but, be patient,
the anaesthetic will take a lot longer to work. It is very difficult
to gauge how much local anaesthetic is needed when injecting
into deeper plane i.e. subcutaneously, as there is no certainty
where the anaesthetic has ended up.
If the operating site is extensive, it may be necessary to insert
the needle more than once. In this situation always re-insert
the needle into the skin which is already numb. The anaesthetic
is injected in a ring fashion, around the planned surgery area,
ensuring all the sensory nerves to the site are blocked.
The second technique is the “Nerve block” where the
anaesthetic is targeted to an area next to the root of one or two
specific nerves which supply the planned surgery area. For this
method to be effective a sound understanding of the
anatomical distribution of the nerve supply at the procedure
site and its surface marking is essential to achieve a successful
block. It is always useful to visualise the nerve pathway to
know where to inject the anaesthetic. Once the exact position
of the nerve has been identified insert small amount (1-2 ml) of
local anaesthesia and sit back and wait. All nerve blocks takes
time to work, allow 10-20 minutes and will fail if it is wrongly
placed or not enough time been allowed for it to take effect . A
small amount of local anaesthesia is enough to numb a large
area of skin and does not produce distortion of the local
anatomy surrounding the target lesion. On the other hand this
method does not produce local vaso-constriction which may
make the procedure more difficult to perform.
Nerve blocks are most commonly used on fingers and toes
blocking the digital nerves supply. Fingers and toes are both
supplied by 2 dorsal and palmar or plantar nerves. The four
point injection (approximately 1ml of plain Xylocaine at each
site) technique is commonly used (Diagram 2). This method is
very useful in ingrowing toe nail or any procedure in the fingers
or toes.
When injecting into fingers or toes one should always use plain
Xylocaine to avoid the theoretical risk of Adrenaline
vaso-constriction causing vascular necrosis).
Another common nerve block is Supratrochlear and
Supraorbital nerve block. Place about 1ml of Xylocaine on the
medial end of eyebrow and same amount on the eyebrow in
line with mid pupillary point .This will numb half of the forehead
and scalp up to vertex region. (Diagram 3) However it may
cause temporary weakness of the Orbitcularis muscle and lead
to temporary drooping eyelid for a few hours. Always warn
patients about this possibility. It is a useful method as basal
cell carcinoma are commonly located on the forehead.
Mental nerve blocks will numb the lower half of lip area and
chin. The Mental nerve exits the lower jaw via the mental
foramen which is situated at the lower jaw root of the 2nd
pre-molar tooth. Retract the lower lip to view the lower gum,
identify the 2nd premolar tooth and inject below the tooth.
(below tooth number 20 and 29 on Diagram 4)
Finally, a useful general tip is to use an anaesthetic cocktail!
Combine a short acting and long acting anaesthetic agent to
prolong the effect and give the patient a better post op
experience (6-8 hours of pain free duration). Simply add the
same amount of short acting Xylocaine with or without
adrenaline to the same amount of Levo bupivacaine (0.25% of
Chirocaine).
A relaxed and pain free patient is a pleasure to work on. All
these local anaesthetic techniques take time and practice to
perfect so don’t get discouraged when it doesn’t work the first
time, just keep trying.
Practice safely and I will cover orientation of incision, cutting
and dissecting technique, control of bleeding in the next article.
Christy Chou
Diagram 1 Diagram 2 Diagram 3
Diagram 4
14 15
Recruiting patients with rare skindisease into two national trials
The Stop Gap TrialChief Investigator: Professor Hywel Williams, University of
Nottingham
Lead Clinician: Dr Tony Ormerod, University of Aberdeen
Trial Manager: Eleanor Mitchell, University of Nottingham
Pyoderma Gangrenosum (PG) is a painful ulcerating skin
condition that often affects people with an underlying systemic
disease (such as IBD, RA). It starts as a reddish purple papule
or blister in the skin that develops into a large, deep spreading
ulcer in a matter of days. People with PG are often
misdiagnosed, which can lead to inappropriate surgical
procedures which can worsen the condition. Many ulcers do
not heal and those that do may take many months, resulting in
lengthy hospital admissions. Patients often have recurrent
episodes of PG and may have multiple lesions.
The study is comparing prednisolone and ciclosporin which our
pilot study revealed are the two most commonly used
systemic treatments for PG (results awaiting publication).
However, currently there is no ‘gold-standard’ treatment as
there has been no large scale RCTs in this area. The purpose of
this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety for prednisolone
and cyclosporin; the hypothesis behind this being that
ciclosporin gains control of the disease more rapidly and reduces
time to healing for patients with PG compared to treatment with
oral prednisolone. For patients who warrant topical therapy,
there is also a parallel observational study. STOP GAP is a
pragmatic trial which has been designed to reflect normal care
as far as possible. Each patient has to attend 4 visits as part of
the study for a maximum period of 6 months or until the wound
has healed (whichever is first). Investigators can see patients as
part of their routine care in between the trial visits if necessary.
To be eligible to participate in the trial, patients must have a
clinical diagnosis of PG and not have taken one of the study
drugs for the previous month. They must be over the age of 18
years and able to give written, informed consent. A full list of
eligibility criteria can be found on the STOP GAP website.
We need your help!
The UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network (www.ukdctn.org) is currently running two large
randomised controlled trials of rare skin conditions in 50 hospitals across the UK.
The STOP GAP Trial (Study of Treatments for Pyoderma Gangrenosum Patients) is recruiting
patients with the rare, ulcerative skin condition ‘Pyoderma Gangrenosum’. The BLISTER Trial (The
Bullous Pemphigoid Steroids and Tetracylines Study) is recruiting patients with bullous pemphigoid.
The UK DCTN are keen to promote these trials to all healthcare professionals involved in the
management of these disorders and more information about the studies is detailed below
Recruitment of patients for this trial is taking place in
secondary care dermatology departments around the UK but
many patients are seen in the community by GPs and nursing
teams involved in wound care. In order for us to reach the
target of 140 patients by April 2012, it is important that as
many patients as possible with PG are considered for entry
into the trial. Therefore, if you see a patient with PG in your
surgery, the STOP GAP study team would be grateful if you
would consider referring them to a Dermatologist involved in
the trial. A full list of hospitals involved in the study can be
found on the website, or by contacting the trial manager
directly.
The STOP GAP Trial is now the largest ever trial in PG and the
results will significantly contribute to the world literature of
Pyoderma Gangrenosum and how to manage this disease
more effectively.
The trial is being funded by the National Institute for Health
Research (NIHR) as part of a Programme Grant awarded to the
Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology at the University of
Nottingham.
For more information about the trial, please visit the website:
www.stopgaptrial.co.uk or contact Eleanor Mitchell, Trial
Manager: 0115 8230489 or [email protected]
The Blister Trial
Chief Investigator: Professor Hywel Williams, University of
Nottingham
Lead Clinician: Professor Fenella Wojnarowska
Trial Manager: Anna Sandell, University of Nottingham
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common of the
autoimmune blistering skin diseases in Western Europe.
BP is a serious condition with a significant associated morbidity
and mortality rate. Widespread tense and haemorrhagic
blisters, skin erosions and severe itching cause patients a great
deal of distress and pain. Patients are often admitted to
hospital for initial treatment; estimates of admission rates vary,
but they are generally high (up to 100%) thus representing a
significant cost to the NHS.
A Cochrane systematic review addressing the treatment of
bullous pemphigoid highlighted the lack of the evidence
informing our current treatment and UK guidelines. However,
the severity of symptoms and lesions in bullous pemphigoid
make treatment mandatory (usually with oral corticosteroids).
It is thought that in this susceptible elderly population that this
corticosteroid treatment contributes to the high mortality rate.
Therefore, the avoidance of systemic corticosteroids in this
vulnerable group of patients is highly desirable and a safer,
effective, low cost alternative is needed.
There is some evidence that tetracyclines may be effective in
treating bullous pemphigoid. Tetracyclines are cheap and
readily available broad-spectrum antibiotics which have other
non-antibiotic properties. In bullous pemphigoid, they are
thought to work by decreasing the complement-mediated
inflammatory response at the basement membrane zone by
suppressing neutrophil chemotaxis and mediators of the
inflammatory response. Doxycycline is the tetracycline used in
this study as it has fewer gastrointestinal side effects than
oxytetracycline, has a better bioavailability and is easier to
swallow as the tablets are smaller, all of which should improve
adherence to the study.
BLISTER is comparing the efficacy and safety of prednisolone
versus doxycycline is a pragmatic trial which is designed to
reflect normal care as much as possible. Patients are involved
for 52 weeks and this involves 7 visits as part of the study.
Patients who are eligible need to have been naïve of treatment
with prednisolone or doxycycline for BP or any other condition
for 1 year and need to have 3 or more significant blisters on 2
or more body sites.
There are 57 hospitals taking part in this study across the UK
and 12 months left to recruit, so please get in contact with me
if you believe you could boost recruitment with patients from
your site. The most important thing to remember when
referring these patients to secondary care is that the patient
should not have started any systemic treatment for this
disease but they can be receiving topical steroids.
The trial is being funded by the National Institute for Health
Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme,
Department of Health, United Kingdom,
For more information about the trial, please visit the website:
www.blistertrial.co.uk or contact Anna Sandell, Trial Manager:
0115 8230510 or [email protected]
February 2011 – April 2011
In the search for new knowledge,
sometimes studies have to be performed
to reiterate the blatantly obvious. We
have become so obsessed with evidence
based medicine, that occasionally,
backtracking is necessary to provide the
evidence base which we have assumed
all along. As an example, we have a
paper from Germany that shows1 that if
you are exposed to more ultraviolet light
as a consequence of your occupation,
you are more likely to develop a
squamous cell carcinoma. There you go.
Point proved, now move on.
In a similar vein, but of possibly greater
significance, is a multinational study2 that
looks at the changes within the skin and
peripheral blood in patients with psoriasis.
This shows that, if psoriasis improves
following sun exposure, there is a rapid
reduction in both local and systemic
inflammatory markers. Now there are
confounding factors, such as stress
reduction, but the effect does seem to
follow ‘natural irradiation’. It is interesting to
note, however, that this was a study
performed on twenty experimental subjects
who were taken to the Canary Islands and
exposed to ‘controlled sun exposure’. A few
skin biopsies and a blood test or two seems
a small price to pay for 16 days ‘exposure’.
It is rare that a paper looks at the specific
constraints in which the vast majority of us
work on a daily basis. Tacrolimus ointment can be used to both treat and prevent
flares in atopic eczema. Over a twelve month period, despite the study3 being
sponsored by the makers of tacrolimus ointment, a twice weekly maintenance
regime significantly delayed and reduced the number of exacerbations compared
with standard, reactive regimes. We often spend so long treating diseases, we
forget that it is often better and, in these trying times, cheaper, to prevent them in
the first place.
More psoriasis and ultraviolet light. Clarification now exists as to the best treatment
regime for the application of topical treatments during a course of phototherapy4. It
seems almost counterintuitive, but also seems to make some form of sense that the
application of emollients immediately prior to treatment with narrowband ultraviolet
light therapy can block the beneficial effects of the irradiation. If, however, they are
applied thirty minutes prior to treatment, they have no effect. Whether this is a
physical barrier or a local effect isn’t clarified, but it seems wise to advise the
application of treatments after phototherapy.
Back to tacrolimus5. More evidence to support the proactive paradigm of the
treatment of atopic eczema. Just to confuse the picture slightly, it would appear that
the use of topical steroids on a twice weekly basis may be more efficacious than
topical tacrolimus when used in the same manner. There are occasions when the
production of evidence actually serves to confuse, rather than clarify. It does,
however, create the need for more trials. Does research create research? I can see
the need for a trial to decide...
Comparative studies seem to be this bulletin’s theme. So here’s another one6.
Photodynamic therapy and topical Imiquimod have become standard treatments for
the treatment of actinic keratoses (although it is interesting to note that topical
5-fluorouracil seems to have been completely ignored...). Both studied treatments
are well tolerated, but photodynamic therapy seems to create a higher level of
patient satisfaction. This is not really surprising. In these days of instant this and
instant that, anything that provides a ‘single shot treatment’ would seem to have an
advantage over a treatment that needs application – both of the treatment vehicle on
a regular basis, but also by the sufferer from the disease.
Adult onset atopic dermatitis has recently been recognised as a disease entity in its
own right. Although it shares some features of the more commonplace atopic
Journal Watch
dermatitis (AD), the aetiology and risk factors require defining. Cigarette smoking,
both active and passive, has been shown to be an independent risk factor for the
development of adult onset AD7. As a tool to discourage people from smoking – and
parents from smoking in front of their children – however, the threat that they
develop eczema in later life seems not to carry as much weight as it perhaps should.
When an article is entitled ‘What’s new in acne?’8, it’s always worth a look at, after
all, acne must be one of the commonest primary care presentations of skin disease.
As it turns out, there’s quite a lot. Benzoyl peroxide is enjoying a bit of a resurgence
at the moment, and it appears that stronger preparations demonstrate no benefit
over weaker ones. Topical retinoids are due for a resurgence and it is reassuring to
note that they do not cause an initial worsening of acne and the irritation that they
cause usually settles by 8-12 weeks of use. The evidence for continuing to use
cyproterone acetate containing oral contraceptives becomes weaker and weaker –
particularly in light of recent problems reported in the press – just about any ‘pill’
seems to demonstrate a reduction in lesion count. Light treatments, particularly
photodynamic therapy, show little benefit over topical treatments. Spironolactone
doesn’t appear to be effective (do you know anyone who has actually used this?)
and, finally, diet may or may not have an influence on severity of acne. Helpful
results like that are always accompanied by a call for more robust research...
Slightly more compact is a study looking at alitretinoin for hand eczema9. This study
was sponsored by the makers of Toctino and, without prejudice, shows that
alitretinoin is well tolerated and effective, with ‘distinct therapeutic benefits’ in the
treatment of chronic hand eczema. Fancy that! On a more considered note, it does
seem that this is a useful new treatment for when other strategies have failed.
Whether it will make the leap to primary care remains doubtful.
Hopefully, by the time you read this, it will be topical and necessary to discuss
sunscreen use10. Sunscreens are traditionally organochemical and physical-mineral
preparations. This study looks at adding antioxidants to sunscreens to improve the
protection offered. It appears that there is a benefit in combining such products that
offers protection over and above that which is offered by the constituents alone.
This combination was particularly effective in preventing photoaging. Expect a
proliferation of new products to hit the shelves...sometime.
The use of photography as an aid to referral management has long been a
contentious topic. In the wilds of Scotland, a study was set up using a novel
approach11. Instead of relying upon the referring practitioner to send a blurry image
captured on a mobile phone, professional medical photographers were engaged to
photograph suspect lesions before the images were reviewed by a dermatologist
and triaged into treatment clinics. Despite the increased cost of the image capture,
this model actually worked out both more cost effective and improved the delivery
of definitive care on the first hospital visit. This could well be a model worth pursuing
elsewhere.
There couldn’t be a bulletin without an advance in immunology. Recently, a model
for autoimmune diseases has been developed where the immune response is
skewed away from regulatory T cells and towards specific T-helper cells (Th1 and
Th17). In this study12, this hypothesis was applied to the pathogenesis of vitiligo. We
have always lumped vitiligo in with other autoimmune diseases, now we appear to
be getting to the root cause of it. This study demonstrated increased levels of
Interleukin-17 in both lesional skin and in circulating serum suggesting an important
role for this particular cytokine in the pathogenesis of vitiligo. As we know from
psoriasis, once an interleukin has been identified, it is only a matter of time before
someone develops a monoclonal antibody
against it. Interesting stuff.
Despite basal cell carcinoma being the
most common cutaneous malignancy, the
anatomical cell of origin is still uncertain.
There is gathering evidence that it may be
a tumour of the hair follicle13, although
there are still some contrary voices being
heard. If you combine all these
hypotheses, then the genesis of BCCs
from mutated stem cells, of either
follicular or inter-follicular origin becomes
increasingly likely. What, I can hear you cry
over your hazelnut latte, is the relevance
of all this? If the stem cell can be
identified, then it can be targeted
specifically – perhaps using receptor
proteins in a more precise fashion than the
current, more shotgun blast like
treatments.
Halo naevi are an interesting phenomenon.
They can present on their own, be a
marker for the presence of a melanoma or,
it seems14, in a subset of patients, can be
the trigger for vitiligo. There does seem to
be some overlap between these two,
otherwise distinct, entities. This may,
along with the interleukin story above, lead
to a greater understanding of the
pathogenesis of vitiligo.
Finally, we have a paper from Brian
Diffey15 looking at the time we spend
outdoors. Whilst this seems, well, less
high powered than some papers we have
looked at, it is nonetheless extremely
important considering the rather delicate
state that the majority of the population
finds itself in with regard to vitamin D
synthesis. Sun exposure, during the
summer months, of 5-30 minutes , three
times a week, is probably adequate to give
an adequate vitamin D status. It would
seem that we easily do this, with, during
the summer months, an average of 1-2
hours being spent outdoors per day. This,
however, may not be comprehensive as
the time of day is almost as important as
the duration of exposure. This may explain
why the majority of the British population
is vitamin D insufficient during the winter
months. I would suggest reading the rest
16 17
18
I’m writing this having just returned from Berlin. Another excellent meeting in what is
a fascinating city. The Russians may have got the idea of a wall from the Romans and
who knows after the recent election another Hadrian or Antonine equivalent may be
appearing if Alex gets his way! Good to see that 25% of the delegates in Berlin were
from Scotland. What do you call a Scots woman with one leg?…..EILEEN.
The more I hear of the fiasco of the NHS “reforms” south of the border the more I’m
glad I’m in the barbaric north. I wondered about having a debate with the motion of
“NHS Scotland should be fully independent” but I have already filled the programme
for the Scottish meeting on 12th/13th November at Westerwood with such
interesting speakers and topics I had no space left. Topics include bullous disorders,
connective tissue disorders, psychodermatology, feet and sex amongst others. I
washed my kilt after last year’s ceilidh…. I couldn’t do a fling with it!
Before Berlin I attended a meeting for GPwSIs which included Clinical Assistants and
Hospital Practitioners at Crieff Hydro. This will hopefully be an annual event so if you
feel you fall into the category of the above have a word with your local LEO rep.
We have the Essential Dermatology Course in Glasgow on May 26th and have been
told there are 70 delegates for this. This shows there is a real hunger for
dermatological knowledge in these parts.
For patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, PSALV are running a
self-management course in June in Glasgow – further information on the PSALV
website.
The Skin Care Campaign Scotland and the Dermatology Council both met on the 3rd
of March. I was unable to attend but some points of note from the minutes include
the Sun Awareness Campaign to be run in schools had not been implemented by the
Holyrood government. Nicola Sturgeon was in favour of it, however, it was uncertain
which department was in charge of moving it forward. Nicola Sturgeon did say that
some indicator for measuring psoriasis treatment was on the Health Secretary’s
agenda. There was, however, nothing agreed either by the government or the RCGP
about compulsory dermatology education for GP registrars despite Dr Sue
Lewis-Jones highlighting this need 2 years ago! The wheels of bureaucracy etc!
The new SIGN guideline on the Management of Atopic Eczema in Primary Care has
now been published for your perusal on the website (No. 125). If you wish to hear
about the recommendations from this guideline, Dr Doug Smith who was on the
Guideline Development Committee will be doing a workshop on these at the Scottish
meeting in November.
I think that’s all for now. Have a great summer.
One last joke…
What do you call a Scotsman without his 4-legged friend?...Douglas
Iain Henderson
News From Northof the Border
of this bulletin outdoors, in the sun,
with adequate protection and a small
refereshing cup of antioxidants – tea,
perhaps. Julian Peace
References1. Schmitt et al - Occupational ultravioletexposure increases the risk for thedevelopment of cutaneous squamous cellcarcinoma: a systematic review andmeta-analysis. BJD2011:164;291-307
2. Soyland et al – Sun exposure induces rapidimmunological changes in skin and peripheralblood in patients with psoriasis.BJD2011:164;344-355
3. Healy et al - Cost-effectiveness of tacrolimusointment in adults and children with moderateand severe atopic dermatitis: twice weeklymaintenance treatment vs. Standard twice dailyreactive treatment of exacerbations from a thirdparty payer (UK National Health Service)perspective. BJD2011:164;387-395
4. Skellet et al - A randomised, double-blind,negatively controlled pilot study to determinewhether the use of emollients or calcipotriolalters the sensitivity of the skin to ultravioletradiation during phototherapy with narrowbandultraviolet B. BJD2011:164;402-406
5. Schmitt et al – Efficacy and tolerability ofproactive treatment with topical corticosteroidsand calcineurin inhibitors for atopic eczema:systematic review and meta-analysis ofrandomised controlled trials.BJD2011:164;415-428
6. Serra-Guillen et al – A randomisedcomparative study of tolerance and satisfactionin the treatment of actinic Keratosis of the faceand scalp between 5% Imiquimod cream andphotodynamic therapy with methylaminolaevulinate BJD2011:164;429-433
7. Lee et al – Lifetime exposure to cigarettesmoking and the development of adult onsetatopic dermatitis BJD2011:164;483-489
8. Smith et al – What’s new in acne? Ananalysis of systematic reviews published in2009-2010.CED:36;119-123
9. DIrschka et al – An open-label studyassessing the safety and efficacy of allitretinoinin patients with severe chronic hand eczemaunresponsive to topical corticosteroidsCED:36;149-154
10. Wu et al – Anti-oxidants add protection to abroad-spectrum sunscreen. CED:36;178-187
11. Morton et al – Community photo-triage forskin cancer referrals: an aid to service deliveryCED:36;248-254
12. Bassiouny et al – Role of interleukin-17 inthe pathogenesis of vitiligo CED36:292-297
13. Sellheyer – Basal cell carcinoma: cell oforigin, cancer stem cell hypothesis and stemcell markers BJD2011:164;696-711
14. Van Geel et al – Prognostic value and clinicalsignificance of halo naevi regarding vitiligoBJD2011:164;743-749
15. Diffey – An overview of the time peoplespend outdoors. BJD2011:164;848-854
and
to
Children with atopic eczema?
Oilatum®
(light liquid paraffin)
Prescribing Information (Please refer to full Summary of Product Characteristics before prescribing)
Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at www.yellowcard.gov.uk. Adverse events should also be reported to Stiefel, a GSK company on 0800 221 441.
NICE guidelines recommend complete emollient therapy for children with atopic eczema. This isthe use of emollients for washing, bathing and moisturising, even when the atopic eczema is clear.1
Patient adherence to an emollient regime has the potential to reduce the need for GP consultations.1
When prescribing Oilatum, ‘Soak and Smooth to Soothe’2–4 is a simple way of explainingcomplete emollient therapy to your patients.
Oilatum® Junior (Light liquid paraffin 63.4% w/w)Uses Liquid bath additive for the treatment of contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, senilepruritus, ichthyosis and related dry skin conditions. Dosage and administration Topicaluse only. Use as frequently as necessary. Oilatum Junior should always be used with water,either added to the water or applied to wet skin. Adult bath: Add 1-3 capfuls to an 8-inchbath of water, soak for 10-20 minutes and pat dry. Infant bath: Add ½-2 capfuls to a basinof water, apply gently over entire body with a sponge and pat dry. Contra-indicationsNone. Precautions Patients should be advised to take care to avoid slipping in the bath.If rash or skin irritation develops treatment should be stopped. Drug Interactions Noneknown. Pregnancy and lactation Safety in human pregnancy or lactation has not beenestablished. Side effects None Legal category: GSL. Presentation and Basic NHScost 150ml £2.82, 250ml £3.25, 300ml £5.10 and 600ml £5.89 Product Licence (PL)no. PL 19494/0064. PL holder GlaxoSmithKline UK Limited, 980 Great West Road,Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS. Trading as Stiefel, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge,Middlesex, UB11 1BT. Last date of revision January 2011. Oilatum Junior is a registeredtrademark of Stiefel, a GSK company.
Oilatum® Shower Gel Fragrance-Free (Light liquid paraffin 70% w/w) Uses Treatment of contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, senile pruritus, ichthyosis andrelated dry skin conditions. Dosage and administration Topical use only. Adults, childrenand the elderly: always apply to wet skin, normally as a shower gel. Use as frequently asnecessary. Shower as usual. Apply liberally to wet skin and massage gently. Rinse briefly
and lightly pat the skin dry. Contra-indications None. Precautions Patients should beadvised to take care to avoid slipping in the shower. Should not be used on greasy skin.Drug Interactions None. Pregnancy and lactation Inadequate evidence regarding thesafety of Oilatum Shower Gel Fragrance-Free in human pregnancy and lactation. Sideeffects None. Legal category: GSL. Presentation and Basic NHS cost: 150g £5.15Product Licence (PL) no. PL 19494/0065. PL holder GlaxoSmithKline UK Limited, 980Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS. Trading as Stiefel, Stockley Park West,Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB11 1BT. Last date of revision January 2011. Oilatum ShowerGel Fragrance-Free is a registered trademark of Stiefel, a GSK company.
Oilatum® Junior Cream (Light liquid paraffin 6% w/w and white soft paraffin 15% w/w)Uses Treatment of contact dermatitis, atopic eczema, senile pruritus, ichthyosis and relateddry skin conditions. Dosage and administration Topical use only. Use as often asrequired. Apply to the affected area and rub in well especially after washing. Oilatum JuniorCream is suitable for adults, children and the elderly. Contra-indications Hypersensitivityto any of the ingredients. Precautions Cetostearyl alcohol and potassium sorbate maycause local skin reactions (e.g. contact dermatitis). Hospital users are advised to followlocal procedures and policies for using topical products on in-patients. Drug InteractionsNone. Pregnancy and lactation There are no restrictions on the use of Oilatum JuniorCream during pregnancy or lactation. Side effects May cause irritation in patientshypersensitive to any of the ingredients. Legal category: GSL. Presentation and Basic
NHS cost Tube: 150g £3.38, Pump pack: 350ml £4.65, 500ml £4.99, 1050ml £9.98.Product Licence (PL) no. PL 19494/0076 and PL 19494/0072 PL holderGlaxoSmithKline UK Limited, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS.Trading as Stiefel, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB11 1BT. Last date ofrevision February 2011. Oilatum Junior Cream is a registered trademark of Stiefel, a GSK company.
References:1. NICE Guideline 57. Atopic eczema in children. December 2007. Available at:
http://www.nice.org.uk. Last accessed March 2011. 2. Oilatum Junior Summary of Product Characteristics, 2010. 3. Oilatum Shower Gel Fragrance-Free Summary of Product Characteristics, 2010. 4. Oilatum Junior Cream Summary of Product Characteristics, 2011.
Date of preparation: March 2011 UK/MARK/0287j/11
2nd Floor, Titan Court, 3 Bishop Square, Hatfield AL10 9NA T: 01707 226024 F: 01707 226001 E: [email protected] W: pcds.org.uk
Forthcoming Meetings 2011
Members of the corporate membership scheme
Essential DermatologyRCP, LondonFriday 9th September 2011
Autumn MeetingLady Margaret Hall, OxfordThursday 22nd September 2011
Essential DermatologySt John's Hotel, SolihullFriday 23rd September 2011
Dermoscopy for BeginnersCrowne Plaza LiverpoolWednesday 28th September 2011
Essential DermatologyNewcastle Marriott Metro CentreFriday 14th October 2011
Basic Skin SurgeryGuys & St Thomas' Education Centre, LondonThursday 20th & Friday 21st October 2011
Advanced Skin SurgeryGuys & St Thomas' Education Centre, LondonFriday 21st & Saturday 22nd October 2011
Advanced Dermoscopy CourseBMA House, LondonThursday 27th October 2011
Essential DermatologyWoodbury Park Hotel, ExeterThursday 3rd November 2011
Scottish MeetingWesterwood Hotel, CumbernauldSaturday 12th & Sunday 13th November 2011
Dermoscopy for BeginnersLeicester MarriottThursday 17th November 2011
Spring MeetingCavendish Conference Centre, LondonFriday 9th March 2012
There is currently much work going on behind the scenes as we get ready to launch the
website with the new software.
Once up and running the new software will have the following benefits:
• The chapters on clinical guidance will run in a standard format, which will not only make
for better reading but it will make updating a lot easier
• Clicking on images will enable them to be opened up into a bigger window
• On-line payments
Once the new software is up and running there are a variety of new chapters including
vitiligo, dermatitis herpetiformis and Neurofibromatosis 1.
As ever any thoughts or suggestions about the websites are welcome.
Best wishes
Tim Cunliffe
Website Update...
www.pcds.org.uk...www.pcds.org.uk...www.pcds.org.uk...www.pcds.org.uk...