17
1 CCSE Energy Week 10/16/10 Changing out light bulbs is NOT cost effective!

Pec at ccse 2010

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Pec at ccse 2010

1

CCSE Energy Week 10/16/10

Changing out light bulbs

is NOT cost effective!

Page 2: Pec at ccse 2010

2

Building systems and technologies

HVAC/RAuditing

Commissioning

Renewable Energy

Smart Grid

Green IT Water Recycling

Smart Building

Integration

Energy Management

Performance

Roofing, Daylighting, Ventilation

Page 3: Pec at ccse 2010

3

the challenge

72% of all US electricity

According to the USGBC, buildings consume . . .

14% of all potable water

38% of all GHG emissions

… and generate

Page 4: Pec at ccse 2010

4

the challenge

61% of all fossil fuels making power

According to the USGS and USEIA, power plants waste. . .

48% of all our fresh water

… and

Page 5: Pec at ccse 2010

5

Low hanging fruit

• Changing out light bulbs or delamping• Retro-commissioning• Changing out a/c units• Old DSM programs like express efficiency

Result: 10 - 15% savings

Page 6: Pec at ccse 2010

6

Let’s compare

Cream skim• Light bulbs

• $50,000 Cost• ROI 40%• 10% energy savings• 0.1% op cost savings

Integrated bundle• HVAC, Controls,

Daylighting, Fenestration• $400,000 Cost + 4%• ROI 15%• 80% energy savings• 15% op cost savings

Page 7: Pec at ccse 2010

7

Over the last fifteen years PE Consulting has engineered over

$1 billion in energy savings

for it’s clients.

Page 8: Pec at ccse 2010

8

Doug’s loading order

Results: 90 - 100% savings

Page 9: Pec at ccse 2010

9

My pet peeves

• Designing around first cost• Energy decisions based on Simple Payback• Designing around LEED points• Not mandating performance metrics• Lack of performance metrics• Lack of continuous benchmarking

Page 10: Pec at ccse 2010

10

w/o benchmarking

• No idea what your limitations or potential are

• Vendor can sell you anything

“If I added up all the savings these vendors told me I’d get, I would save over 150% of what we consume…”

Page 11: Pec at ccse 2010

11

With benchmarks

• Faster decision making• Recognition from management• Stakeholder buy in from all users• Eligible for rebates• EPA Energy Star Portfolio Manager, CBEP• Baseline to judge performance from

Page 12: Pec at ccse 2010

12

EPA Energy Star Portfolio Manager

• Benchmarks across the nation, graded on the curve.

• So don’t get TOO excited if you reach 75%

• Grade against your top peers AND your targets.

Page 13: Pec at ccse 2010

13

w/o performance monitoring

• Driving by watching (only) the rear view mirror• May take months to spot problems, costing $$$• Leed Platinum NC that wouldn’t even make

LEED Silver EBO&M.

Page 14: Pec at ccse 2010

14

With performance monitoring

• Immediate alerts of problems• Prevent (or at least predict) equipment failures

before they happen• Reduce or eliminate comfort calls• Protect your investment• Best Practice Tip - use outside consultant

(at a minimum for setup and validation).

Page 15: Pec at ccse 2010

15

15

How to Fund Energy Efficiency

Utility Spend

Maintenance & Operations Budget

Capital Budget

Savings

Savings

Savings

Grants, Rebates and Tax Credits

Page 16: Pec at ccse 2010

16

What to do

• Benchmark• Master Plan• Audit• Design and Retrofit• Commission and Certify• Refine or start over

Page 17: Pec at ccse 2010

888.LEED.4US | peconsulting.com

sustainability for the 21st century