13
Performance Management: Getting Ready for Accreditation Needs Assessment Survey Community Assessment 1 Online survey Open to anyone interested in this workshop Requested 1 respondent per LHD 52 responses Based on Turning Point PM assessment 6 questions – 5 ranking, 1

Performance Management: Getting Ready for Accreditation Needs Assessment Survey Community Assessment 1 Online survey Open to anyone interested in this

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Performance Management: Getting Ready for

AccreditationNeeds Assessment Survey

Community Assessment 1

• Online survey• Open to anyone interested in this

workshop• Requested 1 respondent per LHD• 52 responses• Based on Turning Point PM assessment• 6 questions – 5 ranking, 1 open ended

Q1. HD Overall readiness/accountability to

implement PM system

2

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

Commitment to implement PM system

31 44 25

Performance managed for some priority areas

19 64 17

Managers trained

10 37 53

Managers accountable

8 33 59

Q1. HD Overall readiness/accountability to

implement PM system

3

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

PM system aligned with SP

13 35 52

PM aligned with budget

8 38 54

Leadership nurtures PM culture

17 46 37

Q2. Current status regarding PERFORMANCE STANDARDS as component

of PM system

4

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

Using PM standards

26 52 22

Using relevant PM standards

22 56 22

Set PM standards for specific time periods

16 54 30

Leaders/mgrs. accountable to PM standards

16 44 40

Q2. Current status regarding PERFORMANCE STANDARDS as component

of PM system

5

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

Processes & methods for choosing performance standards

10 44 46

Standards communicated throughout HD

10 48 52

Standards communicated to stakeholders

2 38 60

Q2. Current status regarding PERFORMANCE STANDARDS as component

of PM system

6

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

Training for staff to use performance standards

12 18 70

Personnel & financial resources to assure HD efforts guided by standards

8 50 42

Q3. Current status regarding PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT as

component of PM system

7

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

Have specific measures for all/most standards, targets, goals

12 48 40

Collect PM data

10 63 27

Training available for staff to understand PM/use PM

8/8

22/23

7069

Q4. Current status regarding PHAB MEASURES related to PM

8

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

Leaders/mgrs. engaged in establishing/ managing PM system

22 51 27

Non-mgt. staff engaged in establishing/ updating PM system

9 40 51

Q4. Current status regarding PHAB MEASURES related to PM

9

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

HD has done PM self-assessment

20 20 60

HD has current functioning PM committee or team

20 24 56

HD has written goals or objective with time frames

13 40 47

Q4. Current status regarding PHAB MEASURES related to PM

10

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

HD has process for monitoring performance of goals & objectives

13 42 45

HD analyzes progress toward achieving goals & objectives, identifies need for improvement

13 36 51

Q4. Current status regarding PHAB MEASURES related to PM

11

Fully operationa

l

Somewhat Barely does or does not

do

HD collects, analyzes performance feedback from customer or stakeholder groups

18 38 44

HD documents staff development in PM

11 32 58

12

Topics to include in PM workshop

• Self-assessment tool• Developing, setting org. objectives, measures,

indicators, standards• Linking CHIP to PM system• Linking individual & agency PM • Linking agency division & individual PM• Software

13

The END

(at least for the

needs assessment

part)