39
Performance Management Elimination or Revolution: Taking Performance Management to the Next Level Tara Morey, Senior Consultant

Performance Management Tara Morey, Senior Consultanttngfoa.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/2018... · Performance Management Elimination or Revolution: Taking Performance Management

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Perform

    ance

    Management

    Elim

    ination or Revolution:

    Taking Performance Management to the Next Level

    Tara Morey, Senior Consultant

  • 2

  • Objectives

    1.Recognize how performance management tools are

    evolving

    2.Review of best practices

    3.Discover how technology is evolving with the new

    practices in performance management

    4.Use a proven process to revise your organization’s

    performance management process

    5.Understand how pay for performance programs are

    impacted and evolving

    3

  • Performance management

    Performance management

    Performance management

    Performance managementis the systematic process by

    which an organization aligns its resources, systems and

    employees to strategic objectives and priorities.

    [Daniels]: “It consists of three primary elements –

    measurement, feedback, and positive reinforcement."

  • Is Perform

    ance M

    anagement Working?

    Strongly Agree

    Strongly Agree

    Strongly Agree

    Strongly Agree

    It ItItItIs Working As Is

    Is Working As Is

    Is Working As Is

    Is Working As Is

    Strongly Disagree

    Strongly Disagree

    Strongly Disagree

    Strongly Disagree

    It Needs Im

    provement

    It Needs Im

    provement

    It Needs Im

    provement

    It Needs Im

    provement

    Provides business value

    26

    .2%

    73

    .8%

    Managers coach for

    development

    8.2

    %5

    6.5

    %

    Business

    and performance

    goals are aligned

    12

    .8%

    54

    .4%

    Performance expectations

    communicated

    11

    .4%

    41

    .6%

    Exemplary behavior

    recognized & rewarded

    19

    .5%

    30

    .9%

    Source: 2014 Brandon Hall Group Performance Management Study (n=223)

    5

  • Perform

    ance M

    anagement Evolution

    In t

    he

    be

    gin

    nin

    g…

    •D

    iscr

    eti

    on

    ary

    (“b

    lack

    bo

    x”)

    •La

    ck o

    f co

    nsi

    ste

    ncy

    •N

    o f

    orm

    al

    pro

    cess

    •E

    mp

    loye

    e f

    rust

    rati

    on

    Ne

    xt

    ge

    ne

    rati

    on

    •D

    isci

    plin

    ed

    an

    d o

    bje

    ctiv

    e

    •Tr

    an

    spa

    ren

    cy

    •G

    oa

    l se

    ttin

    g a

    nd

    ra

    tin

    g

    •Fo

    cus

    on

    th

    e a

    pp

    rais

    al

    form

    –A

    lo

    ok

    ba

    ck

    •A

    nn

    ua

    l re

    vie

    ws

    •S

    tro

    ng

    lin

    ka

    ge

    to

    pa

    y p

    rog

    ram

    s

    •H

    ea

    vy

    ad

    min

    istr

    ati

    ve

    bu

    rde

    n

    •M

    an

    ag

    er

    an

    d e

    mp

    loye

    e f

    rust

    rati

    on

    Tod

    ay

    •Fo

    cus

    on

    de

    ve

    lop

    me

    nt

    an

    d

    imp

    rov

    em

    en

    t

    •M

    an

    ag

    ers

    as

    coa

    che

    s

    •M

    ore

    fre

    qu

    en

    t d

    iscu

    ssio

    ns

    •S

    imp

    le a

    nd

    le

    ss o

    f a

    n

    ad

    min

    istr

    ati

    ve

    bu

    rde

    n

    •Le

    ve

    rag

    ing

    te

    chn

    olo

    gy

    •M

    ov

    ing

    aw

    ay

    fro

    m n

    um

    eri

    cal

    rati

    ng

    s

    •A

    fo

    cus

    forw

    ard

    •R

    ew

    ork

    ing

    lin

    ka

    ge

    to

    pa

    y

    pro

    gra

    ms

    •E

    ng

    ag

    e p

    ee

    rs,

    sub

    ord

    ina

    tes,

    tea

    m m

    em

    be

    rs,

    cust

    om

    ers

    an

    d

    oth

    ers

    in

    pro

    vid

    ing

    in

    -th

    e-

    mo

    me

    nt

    fee

    db

    ack

    •F

    rust

    rati

    on

    le

    ve

    ls?

    ??

    6

  • 7

  • Perform

    ance M

    anagement Best Practices

    Go

    als

    an

    d

    com

    pe

    ten

    cie

    sE

    va

    lua

    tio

    n

    me

    tho

    ds

    Fre

    qu

    en

    cyF

    req

    ue

    ncy

    Tie

    s to

    oth

    er

    pro

    cess

    es

    Tie

    s to

    oth

    er

    pro

    cess

    es

    8

  • Best Practices

    •Aligned and cascaded from the

    top

    •Managers and employees jointly

    set goals

    •Goals are set annually and

    adjusted as needed

    ‒Updated as relevant and as

    business needs change

    •Goals are job specific

    Goals

    9

  • we heard…

    “Our perform

    ance

    man

    agem

    ent process is

    measures meaningless

    activities. We wan

    t to be

    able to differentiate

    perform

    ance and help

    our workforce grow and

    develop.”

    Introducing goal setting to an organization

    10

  • Best Practices

    •Aligned and cascaded from the

    top

    •Managers and employees jointly

    set goals

    •Goals are set annually and

    adjusted as needed

    ‒Updated as relevant and as

    business needs change

    •Goals are job specific

    Goals

    11

  • we heard…

    “Our perform

    ance

    man

    agem

    ent process is

    measures meaningless

    activities. We wan

    t to be

    able to differentiate

    perform

    ance and help

    our workforce grow and

    develop.”

    Introducing goal setting to an organization

    12

  • Introducing goal setting to an organization

    we heard…

    “Our man

    agers will

    struggle to help their

    team

    s set goals that align

    to the organ

    izational

    objectives.”

    Draft goal

    Draft goal

    Draft goal

    Draft goal

    What’s missing?

    What’s missing?

    What’s missing?

    What’s missing?

    Final goal

    Final goal

    Final goal

    Final goal

    Find out about

    possible

    competitors in

    new markets.

    �Specific?

    No

    What form will the output take?

    When is it due?

    What geography will you cover?

    Complete

    competitive

    intelligence

    studies of

    potential

    new

    markets in

    theUS by

    February 1.

    �Measurable

    ?

    No

    Withoutspecificity, it’s difficult to

    apply a metric to this goal.

    �Attainable?

    Yes

    �Relevant?

    Yes

    �Timely?

    No

    Whenis your deliverable due?

    13

  • we heard…

    “At the en

    d of the year,

    our lead

    ership is quick

    to rationalize why an

    em

    ployee co

    uldn’t

    achieve his or her goal”

    Refining goal setting in an organization

    14

  • Best Practices

    •Employees are assessed on a core set of

    common competencies that align with

    organizational culture

    •A competency is defined as a

    knowledge, skill, ability or behavioral

    characteristic that is associated with

    superior performance

    •Competencies must be observable,

    measurable, linked to job requirements,

    and linked to business strategy and

    needs

    •Managers and leaders may have

    additional competencies

    •Everyone is evaluated on job specific

    competencies

    Competencies

    15

  • we heard…

    “We wan

    t to m

    ake sure

    our man

    agers develop

    their skills as lead

    ers of

    the organ

    ization .”

    Introducing competencies to an organization

    16

  • Best Practices

    •Employees complete a self-

    assessment

    •Managers are encouraged to provide

    ratings that differentiate

    (but with no forced distribution

    no forced distribution

    no forced distribution

    no forced distribution)

    •Have a unified process with tailored

    elements for different levels/roles

    •Technology is used to automate and

    enable the process

    •Separate performance discussions

    from compensation conversations

    Evaluation

    Methods

    17

  • How technology fits into the picture

    we heard…

    “It’s tim

    e to m

    ove away

    from paper form

    s.

    We need a process that

    helps man

    agers deliver

    efficien

    t feed

    back.”

    18

  • How technology is evolving

    Focus on goals…

    19

  • How technology is evolving

    Focus on

    feedback…

    20

  • How technology is evolving

    Focus on

    continuous

    conversations…

    21

  • How technology is evolving

    Focus on

    development…

    22

  • Best Practices

    •Conduct formal planning meeting to

    agree on goals at the beginning of the

    period

    •Schedule mid-year, quarterly, or monthly

    “touch base” meetings

    ‒Performance and progress on goals

    ‒Career goals

    ‒Training and development

    •Provide informal feedback as needed

    •Keep performance documentation

    throughout the year

    •Conduct formal appraisal on an annual

    basis

    Fre

    qu

    en

    cy

    23

  • we heard…

    “Our perform

    ance

    man

    agem

    ent process is

    always looking back at

    past perform

    ance. We

    wan

    t to start helping

    employees develop.”

    Introducing development plans to the process

    24

  • we heard…

    “We wan

    t to turn our

    perform

    ance

    man

    agem

    ent process

    into a coaching

    experience. Our

    man

    agers need help in

    delivering tough

    messages and helping

    peo

    ple develop.”

    Creating a coaching experience

    25

  • “Our perform

    ance

    man

    agem

    ent process is

    broken

    . Employees don’t

    know w

    hat is expected of

    them

    . We are thinking about

    getting rid of perform

    ance

    appraisals altogether.”

    Creating a coaching experience

    26

  • Best Practices

    •Can link to pay

    •Link to succession planning

    •Link to development and training

    Tie

    s to

    oth

    er

    pro

    cess

    es

    27

  • Linking Perform

    ance to Pay

    The most common ways employers support a pay for

    performance culture include:

    1.Deliver annual salary increases that provide for

    differentiation between your top and bottom

    performers

    2.Pay annual bonuses to reward for company, team

    and individual success

    3.Offer long-term incentives to the leadership team

    to drive sustained and profitable growth

    28

  • A Culture W

    ith N

    o Pay for Perform

    ance

    Unclear expectations

    and priorities

    Non-performers are

    overcompensated, never

    want to leave

    Reduced incentive for

    employees to be high

    performers

    Higher turnover and likely

    to lose frustrated top

    performers

    REDUCED BUSINESS

    REDUCED BUSINESS

    REDUCED BUSINESS

    REDUCED BUSINESS

    RESULTS

    RESULTS

    RESULTS

    RESULTS

    29

  • we heard…

    “We have a pay for

    perform

    ance philosophy but

    man

    agers don’t know how to

    differentiate pay effectively.”

    Linking Pay to Perform

    ance

    MIN

    MA

    X

    Ex

    ce

    lle

    nt

    E5

    5.5

    0%

    -8

    .00

    %

    Ab

    ov

    e E

    xp

    ec

    tati

    on

    sA

    E4

    3.0

    0%

    -6

    .00

    %

    Va

    lue

    d

    V3

    1.0

    0%

    -3

    .50

    %

    Ne

    ed

    s I

    mp

    rov

    em

    en

    tN

    I2

    0.0

    0%

    -0

    .00

    %

    Un

    sa

    tis

    fac

    tory

    U1

    0.0

    0%

    -0

    .00

    %

    Pe

    rfo

    rma

    nce

    Ra

    tin

    gs

    30

  • we heard…

    “Our co

    mpan

    y is m

    oving away

    from perform

    ance ratingsan

    d

    hope to sim

    plify the process. ”

    Linking Pay –

    Rewards For Contribution

    “On” or “Off”

    Track

    Methodology

    Documentation

    and Guides

    Rewards for

    Contribution

    31

  • we heard…

    “Our top perform

    ers are

    leaving for different

    opportunities an

    d

    experiences.”

    Link to Succession Planning

    Need to plan for anticipated

    labor shortages (e.g., baby

    boomer exodus)

    Need to extend succession

    planning efforts beyond the

    top layers of management

    Need to obtain visibility into

    existing leadership skills or

    need to know where they

    need to be developed

    32

  • Evolving Your Perform

    ance M

    anagement Process

    33

  • we heard…

    “We haven

    ’t done

    anything in

    perform

    ance

    man

    agem

    ent for years.

    Each m

    anager is doing

    his or her own thing.

    It’s tim

    e we got on the

    same page.”

    Using a pilot group

    34

  • we heard…

    “The cu

    lture here will

    not open

    ly accep

    t perform

    ance

    man

    agem

    ent. M

    ay have

    to sell an

    d even force

    it.”

    Identify Barriers

    35

  • Steering Committee

    36

  • To transition, our clients are…

    1.

    Receiving top down support to change the

    way performance is managed

    2.

    Forming cross functional committees to

    lead the initiative and to present

    recommendations

    3.

    Obtaining employee feedback/input

    through surveys or focus groups

    4.

    Branding the initiative

    5.

    Recognizing a need to go back and clarify

    organizational goals first

    6.

    Moving away from ratings (e.g., 3.5) and

    moving to some sort of qualitative rating

    (e.g., on track/off track, meets

    expectations/does not meet expectations)

    7.

    Moving away from just an annual appraisal

    to quarterly conversations (“check-ins”)

    and a year end review

    8.

    Providing Directors and Managers with

    conversation and goal setting training

    9.

    Striving to align goals across the

    organization (not necessarily cascaded)

    10.

    Realizing the culture shift that takes

    time, training and communication to

    develop

    11.

    Beginning by focusing not on job

    specific competencies but on

    organizational competencies and values

    (while they improve job descriptions and

    job competencies along the way)

    12.

    Leveraging technology to manage the

    process more efficiently

    13.

    Focusing on performance process first,

    then compensation

    14.

    Conducting pilot groups with areas of

    the organization that are more goal

    focused already

    15.

    Taking the time to do this right –on

    average, our clients have invested six

    months to develop the performance

    management foundation

    37

  • For performance management to work, it must

    undergo significant changes and shift toward:

    •Providing clarity on what the organization expects of

    each employee

    •A focus on user friendliness and manageability

    •Ongoing, less formal performance conversations

    •Developing managers to be better coaches

    •Fostering an environment that encourages

    employees to own their development

    38

  • Questions?

    Tara

    Tara

    Tara

    Tara Morey

    Morey

    Morey

    Morey

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    216

    216

    216

    216- ---875

    875

    875

    875- ---1909

    1909

    1909

    1909

    39