5
HOME ABOUT THE JAILHOUSE LAWYER Natural Cures Website They Don't Want You To Know About Freedom History of Corporate Rule Netwars Ron Paul Speaks Out Population Control Agenda Gibson Guitars Raid Story Rights of the Accused Bookshelf Liberty Building Permits Waco Caselaw Collection Habeas Corpus Legal Research Justice Legal Quotes More Quotes Reality Zone Rights Jurisdiction Parens Patriae Free "Person" State Citizenship Blog Jailhouse Lawyer defined Tribute to Gerry Spence Andrew Meyer Story Links Site Awards Notice To Public Servants Marbury v. Madison Pro Se Litigation Jurisdictionary HOW TO WIN ... Without a Lawyer! The Battle For Liberty The Abraham Cherrix Story Liberty Award Are We Doomed to be a Police State? Best Free Autosurf Programs Spiritual Anthology The Drug Story Jordan Page Your Rights: Use 'Em or Lose 'Em ‘Person’ I have used the term ‘person’ a number of times, and I believe it deserves some special attention. It derives from the Latin ‘persona,’ an actor’s mask, used in Greek and Roman times for two purposes…to identify the stage character—for one actor often played more than one role, so he would simply switch masks—and to project his voice by means of a megaphoneshaped mouth…per sona, by sound. Hence, our word ‘personality,’ that about ourselves which we project to others. In some, more than others, a presentation that indeed masks our true character or nature. In the Middle Ages it came to be used as synonymous with ‘homo,’ man or individual. This was not the case in ancient (and modern) Roman law. As one legal historian put it: jus personarum did not mean law of persons, or rights of persons, but law of status, or condition. A person is here not a physical or individual person, but the status or condition with which he is invested. (34 Austins Jur., 363. Emphasis added.) In the 15th century, "person came to be used in legal terminology for one (as a human being, a partnership, or a corporation) that is recognized by the law as the subject of rights and duties." (Merriam Webster’s New Book of Word Histories, 1991. Emphasis added.) Note here that it is only the ‘human being’ in his person, as a subject of rights and duties. As Ortolan says, in his History of the Roman Law: The word ‘person’ (persona) does not in the language of the law, as in ordinary language, designate the

Person & Individual Defined

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

LAW STUDY

Citation preview

  • 4/23/2015 "Person"&"Individual"Defined

    http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston/person.html 1/5

    HOMEABOUTTHEJAILHOUSELAWYERNaturalCuresWebsiteTheyDon'tWantYouToKnowAbout

    FreedomHistoryofCorporateRuleNetwarsRonPaulSpeaksOutPopulationControlAgendaGibsonGuitarsRaidStoryRightsoftheAccused

    BookshelfLibertyBuildingPermitsWacoCaselawCollectionHabeasCorpusLegalResearchJusticeLegalQuotesMoreQuotesReality

    ZoneRightsJurisdictionParensPatriaeFree"Person"StateCitizenshipBlog

    JailhouseLawyerdefinedTributetoGerrySpenceAndrewMeyerStoryLinksSiteAwardsNoticeToPublicServantsMarburyv.MadisonProSeLitigationJurisdictionaryHOWTOWIN...WithoutaLawyer!TheBattleForLibertyTheAbrahamCherrixStoryLibertyAwardAreWeDoomedtobeaPoliceState?BestFreeAutosurfPrograms

    SpiritualAnthologyTheDrugStoryJordanPageYourRights:Use'EmorLose'Em

    PersonIhaveusedthetermpersonanumberoftimes,andIbelieveitdeservessomespecialattention.ItderivesfromtheLatinpersona,anactorsmask,usedinGreekandRomantimesfortwopurposestoidentifythestagecharacterforoneactoroftenplayedmorethanonerole,sohewouldsimplyswitchmasksandtoprojecthisvoicebymeansofamegaphoneshapedmouthpersona,bysound.Hence,ourwordpersonality,thataboutourselveswhichweprojecttoothers.Insome,morethanothers,apresentationthatindeedmasksourtruecharacterornature.IntheMiddleAgesitcametobeusedassynonymouswithhomo,manorindividual.Thiswasnotthecaseinancient(andmodern)Romanlaw.Asonelegalhistorianputit:

    juspersonarumdidnotmeanlawofpersons,orrightsofpersons,butlawofstatus,orcondition.Apersonisherenotaphysicalorindividualperson,butthestatusorconditionwithwhichheisinvested.(34AustinsJur.,363.Emphasisadded.)

    Inthe15thcentury,"personcametobeusedinlegalterminologyforone(asahumanbeing,apartnership,oracorporation)thatisrecognizedbythelawasthesubjectofrightsandduties."(MerriamWebstersNewBookofWordHistories,1991.Emphasisadded.)Noteherethatitisonlythehumanbeinginhisperson,asasubjectofrightsandduties.AsOrtolansays,inhisHistoryoftheRomanLaw:

    Thewordperson(persona)doesnotinthelanguageofthelaw,asinordinarylanguage,designatethe

  • 4/23/2015 "Person"&"Individual"Defined

    http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston/person.html 2/5

    physicalman.Inthefirst,itiseverybeingconsideredascapableofhavingorowingrights,ofbeingtheactiveorpassivesubjectofrights.

    Wesayeverybeing,formenarenotalonecomprisedtherein.Infact,lawbyitspowerofabstractioncreatespersons.becauseitmakesofthembeingscapableofhavingorowingrights.

    Weshallthereforehavetodiscriminatebetween,andtostudy,twoclassesofperson:physicalornaturalpersons,forwhichwefindnodistinctivedenominationinRomanjurisprudencethatistosay,themanpersonandabstractpersons,whicharefictitiousandwhichhavenoexistenceexceptinlawthatistosay,thosewhicharepurelylegalconceptionsorcreations.

    Inanothersense,veryfrequentlyemployed,thewordpersondesignateseachcharactermaniscalledupontoplayonthejudicialstagethatistosay,eachqualitywhichgiveshimcertainrightsorcertainobligationsforinstance,thepersonoffatherofsonassubjecttohisfatherofhusbandorguardian.Inthissensethesamemancanhaveseveralpersonaeatthesametime.(Emphasisadded.)

    TheInternalRevenueCodeisRomanorcivillaw,togetherwithitssibling,maritimeoradmiraltylaw.Thus,asIdiscussbelow,theSupremeCourtclearlystatesthatallincometaxesareoncorporations,assetforthintheCorporationTaxActof1909,notonpeople.Thatiswhyall48titlesalwaysspeakofpersons,neverpeople,humanbeings,ormenorwomenafictioncanonlydealwithafiction.

    ThiswasmadeclearevenbeforetheConstitution,inTheFederalistPapers,No.15:

    Exceptastotheruleofapportionment,theUnitedStateshaveanindefinitediscretiontomakerequisitionsformenandmoneybuttheyhavenoauthoritytoraiseeitherbyregulationsextendingtotheindividualcitizensofAmerica.(Emphasisadded.)

    Letmeputalittlefleshonthesebones.TheSupremeCourtstatedinEdwardsv.CubaRRCo.,268US628that:

    themeaningofincomeasusedintheCorporationExciseTaxLawof1909isnottobedistinguishedfromthemeaningofthesamewordasusedintheIncomeTaxLawof1913andtheRevenueActof1916.MerchantsLoan&TrustCo.v.Smietanka255US509.(Emphasisadded.)

    However,aspointedoutbyKennethWeiland,itisofinteresttonote,also,aFederalClaimsCourtcase,MarylandCasualtyCo.v.U.S.:

    BytheactofAugust5,1909,aspecialexcisetaxwasimposedupontheprivilegeofcarryingonbusinessbycorporations.Itwasinrealityalicensetocarryonbusiness.TheIncomeTaxActofOctober3,1913,shouldbeconsideredasastatutoryconstructionoftheactofAugust5,1909,insofarasitrelatedtothebasisoftaxation.(DecemberTerm,191617[52C.Cls.]Emphasisadded.Thiswilltakeonfurthermeaningtowardtheendofthispaper.)

    BeitnotedthatintheCaliforniaPenalCodepersonisclearlydistinguishedfromCitizen.PenalCode228states:"Anycitizenofthisstatewhoshallfightaduel"Whileat232itstates:"Anypersonofthisstatewhofightsaduel"(Emphasisadded.)

    "Incommonusage,thetermpersondoesnotincludethesovereign[and]statutesemployingthe[word]areordinarilyconstruedtoexcludeit."Wilsonv.OmahaIndianTribe,442U.S.653,667(1979),quotingUnitedStatesv.CooperCorp.312U.S.600,604(1941).

  • 4/23/2015 "Person"&"Individual"Defined

    http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston/person.html 3/5

    IndividualThetermofartindividualisalsofrequentlyemployedinthecodes.Whichisevenmoresneaky,becausemostpeoplebelievethiswordtobe,forallintentsandpurposes,synonymouswithahumanbeingwhatthelawreferstoasanaturalperson.Romanlawhardlyreferredtosuchaphysicalbeing,excepttherareusageofsingularispersonawhich,however,stillemployspersona,therebypreservingajuridicalnexus,inapplicabletoasentientman(homo).Anabstract,fictitiouspersonisneeded.RecallJudgeBork,onpage11,above,sayingthat90%ofthoseinprisonweretherebecausetheyconsentedtotheprocess?Youconsentwhenyouagreetobesubjecttoastatutedealingwithpersonswhichwehaveseentobefictionalcorporateconstructsorentities.Thecodeanyofthe48titlesonlyappliestoahumanbeingatthepoints/heagreestotakeonthecharacter,status,personaofanartificialjuristicpersona.Alwaysrememberthatwhenthecodesays"anyperson,"itmeans"anypersoninthejurisdictionofthiscode."Oneobligatesoneselftothecivilcodebyanactofassumpsiti.e.,volunteeringtobethatperson.(Assumpsit:"Apromiseorengagementbywhichonepersonassumesorundertakestodosomeactorpaysomethingtoanother."BlacksLawDictionary,6thedition.RecalltheChisholmcase,above.)Youwillneverseeinanycode,Stateorfederal,thewordmanorwomanorpeopleatleastIdontrecallhavingdonesoonlythejuristic,statutoryperson.

    PeopleareunderstandablyconfusedaboutonwhatIbelievetobethecorrectsignificationofaparticularclassofpersons,namely,anaturalperson.Itisalmostalwaysusedlooselytorefertothephysical,sentienthumanbeing.Indeed,instatutorylawthisisthetermofchoiceforalivingmanbutalwaysinaqualifiedsense.At26CFR1.60494(f)Definitionsweread:

    Thetermnaturalpersonmeansanyindividual,butshallnotincludeapartnership(whetherornotcomposedentirelyofindividuals),atrust,oranestate.(Emphasisadded.)

    Noticecarefullyhowtheyseeitasbothpossibleandnecessarytoqualifyindividual.Ifthistermstoodforalivingman,itwouldbepointlessandridiculoustosaythatitcouldnotbeatrustoranestate!Theywouldntsaythatamanshallnotincludeanestate.

    Sothen,weseethatperson,naturalperson,andindividualareallfictitiouslegalcreations.And,ifyouacquiescetobeinganyofthem,inalegalsetting,youtherebyagreethatthecodeaddressesandappliestoyou.

    Thisiswhysomehaveanaversiontoreferringtotheirappearanceincourtasbeinginpropriapersonawhichsomedotoavoidpleadingprose,foroneself,whenappearingwithoutanattorney.Theydontwanttorepresentthemselves,butbethemselves.And,sinceinpropriapersonameansinonesownproperperson,itwouldseemtoovercomethisobjection.BethisasitmayandIamawareofmanyargumentsproandconthecourtstillreferstoyourappearanceasbeingprose.Personally,ifIfoundmyselfinthatsituation,Iwouldappearinrerumnatura,intherealmofactualityinexistence,(BlacksLawDictionary,6thedition)theoppositeofbeingafictitiousperson.

    Weshouldlook,too,attheveryfirstterminthegeneraldefinitionchapterfortheentireIRC:Section7701(a)(1)andwelltheyshouldbeginthere,forallstatutorylawrestsonthefoundationofthisjuristicfabrication.

    Person.Thetermpersonshallbeconstruedtomeanandincludeanindividual,atrust,estate,partnership,association,company,orcorporation.

  • 4/23/2015 "Person"&"Individual"Defined

    http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston/person.html 4/5

    Therefore,sincewenowknowthat,inlaw,personcannotbeanythingbutafictitiousjuridicalcreation,itfollowsineluctablythatifindividualissaidtomeantheexactsamething,thenitmustalsorefertothesametypeofunnaturalandartificialentityasperson.

    ThisisprettywellnaileddownbyacoupleofcitesfromtheCFR.At5CFR582.101(4)weread:

    Personsmayincludeanindividual,partnership,corporation,association,jointventure,privateorganizationorotherlegalentity,andincludesthepluralofthattermpersonmayincludeanyoftheentitiesthatmayissuelegalprocessassetforthin(Emphasisadded.)

    In7CFR400.303(m)wefind:

    Personmeansanindividual,partnership,association,corporation,estate,trust,orotherlegalentity,andwheneverapplicable,aStateorapoliticalsubdivision,oragencyofaState.(Emphasisadded.)

    Hereitisintheregulations,anindividualisalegalentity,nota(wo)man,asentienthumanbeing.

    So,itmakesperfectsensethat5USC552a(a)(2)shouldholdthat"thetermindividualmeansacitizenoftheUnitedStatesoranalienlawfullyadmittedforpermanentresidence(3)"(Emphasisadded.)Foracitizeniscertainlyajuristicperson.

    Adiscussionofperson,however,wouldnotbecompletewithoutreferenceto26USC7343Definitionofterm"person."ThisisattheveryendofChapter75Crimes,OtherOffensesandForfeitures,whichincludessuchgoodiesas7203Willfulfailuretofilereturn,supplyinformation,orpaytax,whichbegins:"Anypersonrequiredunderthistitletopay"(Emphasisadded.)

    Section7343readsinitsentirety:

    Thetermpersonasusedinthischapterincludes[isrestrictedto]anofficeroremployeeofacorporation[suchastheU.S.orsomecompanyincorporatedinthefederalzone],oramemberoremployeeofapartnership,whoassuchofficer,employee,ormemberisunderadutytoperformtheactinrespecttowhichtheviolationoccurs.

    Forstarters,Section7203isapenaltysectionandmakesnoattempttoestablishanyliability.Plus,theimplementingregulationsareinTitle27BATFmeaningthatitisexclusivelyfortheiruse,withexcisetaxes!IthasnothingtodowiththeIRS.Leavingallthataside,doyoubelievethatyoucouldbechargedasbeingthepersondescribedabove?Doyouworkforthefederalgovernmentoradomestic(U.S.,notState)corporation?

  • 4/23/2015 "Person"&"Individual"Defined

    http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston/person.html 5/5

    (NEWUPDATED2NDEDITION!)"NaturalCuresTheyDon'tWantYoutoKnowAbout"

    ~byKevinTrudeau~CLICKHERETOORDERTHISINCREDIBLEBOOK!

    (TheNaturalCuresBookAsSeenonTV)BOOKSAREINSTOCK&READYTOSHIP!

    "THEREALITYZONE"

    MyStumbleUponPage

    Search: AllProducts

    Keywords: