PHILOSOPHY

HISTORY OF

Aristotle said: “All men by nature desire to know.” He further stated that philosophy begins in wonder. If so, its origin must lie as far back

as humanity.

Thales[Miletus, 624-546 BC]

Central theme:

- the substance from which the universe is made, that is, “What is everything made

of, or what kind of “stuff” goes into the composition of things such as earth, clouds, and oceans.

- He argued that in spite of the differences between various things, there is a basic similarity between them all. He assumed that some single element, some “stuff,” a stuff that contained its own principle of action or change, lay at the foundation of all physical reality.

He thought that this stuff is WATER.

Anaximander[Miletus, 610 - 546 BC]

Anaximander made bold inquiries; he questioned the myths, the knowledge of the

old, the heavens, and even the gods themselves.

Meteorology is a perfect example for this. Anaximander explained the

wind as the fine and moist effluvium of air massing together and set in motion by the sun. He

explained rain as coming from vapor sent up by the things

beneath the sun.

He also founded the sciences of geography and astronomy.

Moreover, he was the first man in Greece who drew a map of the known world, which was later

refined by travellers and other scholars.

Anaximander[Miletus, 610 - 546 BC]

While there were many unique aspects in Anaximander’s meteorology, geography and

cosmology, what he is ultimately known for is his theory of the apeiron. The apeiron is the

Boundless or the Infinite. Anaximander held that the universe is boundless and that the

number of worlds in it is infinite. Thus the argument develops from the physical model of the cosmos and carries on the idea of cosmic

balance into a striking metaphysical argument.

Pythagoras[Samos, 582 - 500 BC]

- born in Turkey and is considered as father of modern scientific &

mathematical thought. the Pythagorean theorem about right-

angled triangles: a²+b²=c².

- he saw numbers in everything. He was convinced that the divine

principles of the universe, though imperceptible to the senses, can be expressed in terms of relationships of numbers. He therefore reasoned that the secrets of the cosmos are revealed by pure thought, through

deduction and analytic reflection on the perceptible world.

This eventually led to the famous saying that “all things are numbers.”

He is convinced that NUMBERS HOLD THE KEY TO GRASPING THE

NATURE OF REALITY.

Heraclitus[540-480 BCE]

The Greeks before Heraclitus focused on the essence of things, its nature and

being, which they deemed unchangeable. In contrast, Heraclitus said: "You cannot step into the same river twice, for fresh

waters are ever flowing in upon you." This simple sentence expresses the gist of his

philosophy, meaning that the river isn't actually the same at two different points

in time. - It is a radical position and Heraclitus was the to conceive it. He

looked at everything being in the state of permanent flux and, hence, reality being merely a succession of transitory states. He told people that nothing is the same now as it was before, and thus nothing

what is now will be the same tomorrow. With this he planted the idea of

impermanence into Greek thought, and indeed, after Heraclitus Greek philosophy

was not the same anymore.

Parmenides and Zeno[Elea, 515 - ? BC]

Heraclitus maintained that everything changes, and since philosophers love

to argue, it is perhaps unsurprising that someone stated the exact

opposite, namely that nothing ever changes. This view was put forward

by Parmenides, son of Pyres who came from Elea, a Greek foundation

in southern Italy.Parmenides stated that the senses deceive us and, hence, our perception of the world does not reflect the world as it really is. Instead, the real world is something above our apprehension and can only be apprehended through logic. His chief doctrine is that the only true being is "the One" which is indivisible and infinite in time and space.

Zeno said: motion and change is an illusion

The runner starts at the beginning of the racecourse and reaches the goal in a given

time. In this example of motion, the runner traverses a series of units of distance, foot

perhaps. Zeno holds, that each unit of distances can be divided into smaller

distances, 1/2 foot, 1/4 foot, 1/8 foot and so on, until at last we have an infinite number of

distances. How can the runner traverse an infinite number of distances in a finite

amount of time?

Empedocles[Acragas, 490 - 430 BC]

- there are four primordial elements: earth, air, fire and water.

Empedocles came to the conclusion that motion

and change actually exist and that at the same

time reality is fundamentally

changeless, allowing the validity of both Heraclitean and

Parmenidean doctrines and combining them into

a new and surprising concept.

Love (harmony) is the uniting force that attracts

all things, thereby creating something new, and Strife (discord) is the

dividing force that separates and destroys

things.

Anaxagoras[500-428 BC]

- Anaxagoras agreed with Empedocles that all coming into and going out of being is

merely the composition and decomposition of existing substances, but he rejected

Empedocles' Love and Strife theory, probably because there was no scientific

reason that spoke for it.MIND is something infinite and self-controlling, and that is has been mixed

with no thing, but is alone itself by itself. The process by which matter is formed, he argued, is separation. The material world, which springs from the all-containing "One" creates itself through continuous dichotomization. It produces forms of multiplicity with increasing complexity. According to Anaxagoras, this process is originated and controlled by "mind" (nous).

Leucippus and Democritus[460 - 370 BC]

Leucippus and Democritus did not accept the Eleatic hypothesis that "everything is one" and that change and motion is an illusion.

Change, they explained, is an observation that does not deceive the senses; change is real, it happens on account of the recombination of more rudimentary substances.

They held that the nature of things consists of an infinite number of extremely small

particles, which they called atoms. Atoms are physically, but not geometrically, indivisible.

Democritus described atoms as being indestructible and completely full, i.e.

containing no empty space. Because of their indestructibility, atoms are eternal.

They hold that the universe is composed of an infinite number of minuscule, indestructible particles of matter, which through their combinations and movements, produce all phenomena.

The most famous is the homo-mensura (man-measure) statement: man is the measure of all

things, of the things that are, that they are, and of the things that are not, that they are not.” Each

individual is the ultimate standard of all judgments that one makes.

Protagoras490 –420 BCE Agnosticism - the claim that we cannot know

anything about the gods.

Protagoras' prose treatise about the gods began "Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not or of what sort they may be. Many things prevent knowledge including the obscurity of the subject and the brevity of human life."

Socrates469-399 B.C.

He was committed for the pursuit of truth unlike the Sophists. He was also attempting to discover the foundation of the good life. He linked knowing & doing, so that to know the good is to do the good.

The doctrine of Socrates can be summed up in two words: concepts, morality -- or better, moral concepts.

The concept is that of which all think when they speak of a thing. In the rational part of every man there exist some notions which are common to all and hence enjoy universality and necessity, and which form the substratum of true understanding or knowledge. True science is universal; that is, it is

common to all men and to all times; it is objective, and is not subject to the changes of fortune.

Plato (427-347 BCE)

Plato’s Theory of Knowledge

Plato distinguishes four degrees of knowledge:Apprehension of pure sense images, such as dreams and imaginations;Perceptive knowledge of sensible objects, the purpose of which is to form a particular judgment, such as "This rose is red;...this light is beautiful";Mathematical knowledge -- for instance, the apprehension of the particular shape of the perceived rose.Philosophical knowledge, which consists in the apprehension of the Ideas, as absolute, unconditioned and eternal realities.

The four degrees of knowledge may be reduced to two fundamental classes:1. Sense knowledge, which includes apprehension of sensorial images, and perception of sensible objects;2. Intellective knowledge, which includes mathematical notions and knowledge of ideas.

Aristotle (384-322 BC)

Ethics, for Aristotle, has the purpose of establishing what is the end that man,

according to his nature, must attain, and also from what source his happiness comes.

The end of man, as for every being, according to the doctrine established in metaphysics, is the realization of the form, the attainment of

the perfection due to his nature.

Ethics

Now man is a rational animal, and hence his end will be the attainment

of wisdom. The actions which bring one to the realization of this

perfection of living according to

reason are called virtues. Virtue, is not the end, but the means to

attain perfection, and consists in a conscious action fulfilled according

to reason.