Physics – Einstein’s Relativity - TSFX · The School For Excellence 2014 The Essentials – Physics – Einstein’s Relativity Page 3 Newton also assumed that physical quantities

Physics – Einstein’s Relativity

important notes Our policy at TSFX is to provide students with the most detailed and comprehensive set of notes that will maximise student performance and reduce study time. These materials, therefore, include a wide range of questions and applications, all of which cannot be addressed within the available lecture time i.e. Due to time constraints; it is possible that some of the materials included in this booklet will not be addressed during the course of these lectures.

Where applicable, fully worked solutions to the questions in this booklet will be handed to students on the last day of each subject lecture.

Although great care is taken to ensure that these materials are mistake free, an error may appear from time to time. If you believe that there is an error in these notes, please let us know asap ([email protected]). Errors, as well as clarifications and important updates, will be posted at www.tsfx.com.au/vce-updates

The views and opinions expressed in this booklet and corresponding lecture are those of the authors/lecturers and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of TSFX.

These materials are the copyright property of The School For Excellence and have been produced for the exclusive use of students attending this program. Reproduction of the whole or part of this document constitutes an infringement in copyright and can result in legal action. No part of this publication can be reproduced, copied, scanned, stored in a retrieval system, communicated, transmitted or disseminated, in any form or by any means, without the prior written consent of The School For Excellence (TSFX). The use of recording devices is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Recording devices interfere with the microphones and send loud, high-pitched sounds throughout the theatre. Furthermore, recording without the lecturer’s permission is ILLEGAL. Students caught recording will be asked to leave the theatre, and will have all lecture materials confiscated.

it is illegal to use any kind of recording device during this lecture

copyright notice

TSFX - voted number one for excellence and quality in VCE programs.

author(s)

These materials represent the collective effort of many teachers across the state. The principal author of this booklet is:

Dr. Greg Wilmoth, B. Sc (Hons)., Ph.D., Dip. Ed., Grad. Dip. Computing (Senior VCE Teacher – Haileybury College)

lecturer(s)

To ensure that students are afforded every possible advantage in their examinations, our lectures are prepared and delivered by qualified, currently practising VCE teachers and official VCAA exam markers who possess the knowledge and experience to demonstrate the means by which students can achieve the higher ATAR scores. Further details regarding our teachers (including qualifications and experience) may be obtained at http://www.tsfx.com.au/what-is-tsfx/ourteachers/.

“the essentials” lectures, 2014

The School For Excellence 2014 The Essentials – Physics – Einstein’s Relativity Page 1

INTRODUCTION The theory of special relativity, explains how to interpret motion between different inertial frames of reference – that is, places that are moving at constant speeds relative to each other. Special relativity includes only the special case (hence the name) where the motion is uniform. The motion it explains is only if you’re travelling in a straight line at a constant speed. As soon as you accelerate or curve – or do anything that changes the nature of the motion in any way – special relativity ceases to apply. That’s where Einstein’s general theory of relativity comes in, which is not part of this unit of study. Einstein’s Special Relativity theory is based on two key principles: • The principle of relativity: The laws of physics don’t change, even for objects moving in

inertial (constant speed) frames of reference. • The principle of the speed of light: The speed of light is the same for all observers,

regardless of their motion relative to the light source. (Physicists write this speed using the symbol c.)

In the latter part of the 19th century, physicists were searching for the mysterious thing called ether – the medium they believed existed for light waves to wave through. Einstein just removed the ether entirely from his thinking and assumed that the laws of physics, including the speed of light, worked the same regardless of how you were moving – exactly as latter day experiments and mathematics showed them to be! Einstein’s theory of special relativity created a fundamental link between space and time. The universe can be viewed as having three space dimensions – up/down, left/right, forward/backward – and one time dimension. This 4-dimensional space is referred to as the space-time continuum. If you move fast enough through space, the observations that you make about space (dimensions and mass) and time, differ somewhat from the observations of other people, who are moving at different speeds. This is the unification of space-time.


GALILEAN RELATIVITY Galileo’s Principle of Relativity states that all motion is relative to some particular frame of reference, but there can be no frame of reference that has an absolute zero velocity. Galileo stated that you cannot tell if you are stationary or moving uniformly without looking outside your frame of reference. Galileo showed that there was no absolute frame of reference. This would imply that there is somewhere in the Universe that is stationary (or absolute rest). Inertial frame of reference: Frames of reference that are at rest or moving with constant velocity are called inertial frames of reference.

NEWTONIAN RELATIVITY Newton knew that motion was relative, but he believed there was a fixed frame of reference to which all others could be compared. This frame was called the ether. The principle of relativity states that the laws of physics do not depend on the velocity of the frame of reference. Newton’s Laws of Motion do not contradict the principle of relativity. For Example: There are two motor cars. Car A is at rest relative to the ground while Car B is travelling at 25 ms-1 north relative to Car A. Car A increases its speed to 50 ms-1 north in 10 seconds. What is the acceleration of Car A from reference points of the ground and of Car B? The acceleration of Car A relative to the ground is given by:

northmst

va groundtorelative

2)( 0.5

10050 −=−=Δ=

Relative to Car B, the initial speed of Car A is 25 ms-1 south (which we’ll call –25 ms-1), and the final speed is 25 ms-1 north. Therefore the acceleration of car A relative the car B is given by:

northmsa Bcartorelative20.5

102525 −

−

=−=

We can see that the acceleration of Car A, and hence the force and changes in momentum experienced on Car A and its occupants, does not depend on the frame of reference. When you discuss the velocity of an object, you usually assume, without saying so, that the frame of reference is the Earth. In this section, however, we will be analysing motion from different frames of reference and so the frame of reference needs to be stated. A stationary frame of reference and a frame of reference with constant velocity are called inertial frames of reference. Newton’s laws of motion are valid in these inertial frames of reference.


Newton also assumed that physical quantities such as mass, time, distance and so on were absolute quantities. This means that their values don’t change whatever the frame of reference. This would seem to make sense as you wouldn’t expect the size of an object to change as it travels faster. Put simply, the relative velocity of two bodies is given by the following relationship:

Velocity of B relative to A = Velocity of B − Velocity of A

ABBrA VVV −= EXAMPLE 1 As a man stands on the road, a car due north approaches at 20 ms-1. (a) What is the velocity of the car relative to the man? (b) What is the velocity of the man relative to the car? Solution Velocity of the car = 20 ms-1 S Velocity of the man = 0 (a) ABBrA VVV −= = 20 – 0 = 20 ms-1 S

(b) NmsSmsVVV BAArB11 2020200 −− =−=−=−=

(Note that the vector –20 ms-1 south is the equivalent to 20 ms-1 north.)


QUESTION 1 You are in interstellar space and know that your velocity relative to Earth is 3.5 × 106 ms–1 away from Earth. You then notice another spacecraft with a speed, towards you, of 5 × 105 ms–1. Is the other craft heading toward or away from Earth, and at what speed? Solution QUESTION 2 An aeroplane can fly at 130 ms–1 through the air. The pilot wants to fly to a destination 500 km due north and then fly straight back. However, there is a west wind blowing at 50 ms–1. (a) In the absence of any wind, how long would the return trip take? (b) Given the 50 ms–1 west wind, how long will a return trip take if the pilot heads the plane so that the actual ground velocity is due north or south? (c) On another occasion there is a 50 ms–1 north wind blowing. Compare the time for a return trip to the same destination on this occasion with that in part (b). Solution


THE DOPPLER EFFECT The Doppler Effect is also an example of Newtonian relativity. It is an example of how objects moving relative to an observer may seem to be different because of their movement. Let’s consider a stationary source ‘S’ emitting a single frequency sound. An observer at all points around the source would detect the same frequency. For example, in figure (a) the wavelength of the sound is the same in all directions.

If, however, the source is moving at constant speed, such as to the right as in figure (b), the sound reaching observer 1 (O1) has a shorter wavelength than the sound arriving at observer 2 (O2). In fact the sound reaching O1 has a longer wavelength than the original source of sound. This phenomenon will result in observer 1 hearing a higher frequency sound than observer 2. You may have noticed this as a noisy car passes you. The faster the source, the more pronounced is the effect. The wavelength of the source is modified by the amount the source moves in one period.

QUESTION 3 Which one of the following statements is the best statement about inertial frames of reference? A Inertial frames must be stationary. B Inertial frames must be accelerating. C The laws of physics have the same form in all inertial frames. D Inertial frames cannot be moving at close to the speed of light.


MICHELSON — MORLEY EXPERIMENT James Maxwell proposed that light was an electromagnetic phenomenon that took time to get from one place to another and that light behaved as a wave. It was commonly accepted that waves, such as water waves and sound, transfer energy and require a medium through which to travel. These waves do not exist without their media. But what is the medium for light? It was proposed that the medium through which light travels is the luminiferous ether that was thought to permeate all matter and space. The speed of light was measured to be 3.0 x 108 ms-1, but relative to what? Presumably it was relative to the ether, but no one could prove that it existed. The dilemma was that if the speed of light was relative to the ether, then someone in another frame of reference would observe a different speed for light. The most famous attempt to detect this ether was the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887. This experiment attempted to measure the ether wind that should be blowing against the Earth as it moved through the ether. As the Earth revolves around the Sun it travels at about 30 kms-1, relative to the Sun. While this is considerably slower than the speed of light, in fact

about th000,101

of the speed of light, a beam of light emitted into the ether wind would travel

at 299970 kms-1, whereas a beam emitted in the opposite direction would travel at 300030 kms-1. A beam emitted across the wind would travel at the speed of light. It was not possible to directly measure the speed of light to the accuracy needed, so Michelson and Morley compared the speed of light on two paths perpendicular to each other. The comparison was achieved by reflecting light from a single source back and forward between two sets of mirrors mounted at right angles and fixed rigidly to a block of granite floating on a bath of mercury. If the light was travelling into the wind, the velocity relative to the Earth is vc − and the time

for this leg of the journey is vc

Lt

−=1 .

On the return journey the wind is behind the light so its velocity relative to the Earth is vc +

and the time is vc

Lt

+=2 .

The total time for the journey is:

−

=+

+−

=+=

2

221

1

2

c

vc

L

vc

L

vc

Lttt


Their interferometer was capable of detecting very tiny time differences based on principles of interference patterns, which is discussed in more detail in Unit 4 Physics. Basically, since light is assumed to have wave properties, then two light waves can interfere with each other. If they are in phase, i.e. crest meets crest, then superposition gives us a greater crest. This is constructive interference and with light this is represented by a band of bright light. If however, the waves are half a wavelength out of phase, then one crest and one trough meeting at the same point of space will cancel themselves out, which is called destructive interference and would be seen as a dark band. These interference patterns had been clearly documented and explained by Young. Michelson reasoned that two beams of light split from a single source could be sent on different paths and on return produce an interference pattern that would enable them to see whether the waves are in phase, or have experienced a phase shift. Presumably, if these rays were sent on the same length journey and at the same speed then the time each ray takes on the journey should be identical, and the rays would be ‘in phase’. If, however, the rays travel at different speeds to each other, then the time taken for the journey would be different and on return would have a slight phase difference. In order to bring the waves back into phase, he had a path length adjustment, enabling him to change the path length of one beam by minute amounts.

A simplified diagram of Michelson and Morley’s apparatus. (Nelson Physics Units 3 & 4 3rd Ed)


Their equipment had sufficient precision to be able to adjust path lengths by fractions of a wavelength, hence make allowances for minute time differences in the journeys of the split beam. As mentioned before, a path difference equal to half the wavelength of the light used will result in a bright fringe being replaced with a dark fringe. Through the telescope, Michelson could see fringes displaced by much less than this. Consider red light of wavelength 700 nm.

Using λfv = and T

f1= we get

Tcv

λ== and c

Tλ= .

An adjustment of one full wavelength of a 700 nm beam corresponds to a time difference of:

sc

T 158

9

103.2100.310700 −

−

×=××

== λ

Using an 11 m path for the light, Michelson predicted a time difference for the two beams in the order of 3.7 x 10-16 s. This would produce a clearly discernible phase shift, well within the capability of the equipment. Michelson and Morley rotated the apparatus fully and made observations at different times of the day and at different times of the year. This enabled one beam of light to be projected either in the direction the earth was travelling, or away from the direction it was travelling, or even across the direction it was travelling. Also, any time difference should change smoothly as the apparatus is rotated so that the beams point in different directions. It made no difference. The interference did not alter by any measurable amount. The light took the same time for the light to travel the two paths regardless of the motion of the Earth. Michelson’s interferometer was, however, capable of detecting these tiny time differences if they did indeed exist. The inability of Michelson and Morley to detect the presence of the ether, provided an important platform for the theory on relativity that Einstein was soon to propose.

QUESTION 4 Michelson and Morley performed an experiment to measure the speed of light with respect to the ether. They believed that Earth moved in its orbit with speed v relative to the ether. They believed there should be a difference in the measured speed of light depending on whether it was measured parallel or perpendicular to the direction of Earth’s movement through the ether. The Michelson–Morley experiment found the ratio of the speed of light measured parallel to the Earth’s motion through the ether the speed of light measured perpendicular to the Earth’s motion through the ether to be: A Slightly less than one. B Equal to one. C Slightly greater than one. D Significantly greater than one.


QUESTION 5 Which of the following statements best describes what the Michelson-Morley experiment attempted to measure? A The speed of Earth through space. B Changes in the speed of Earth through space. C Accuracy obtainable with an optical interferometer. D Differences in the speed of light in different directions. QUESTION 6 Which one of the following best describes what follows directly from the measurements of the Michelson–Morley experiment? A Earth travels through a stationary ether. B The ether may exist, but it is not detectable. C The speed of light near the surface of Earth depends on the direction in which it is

measured travelling. D The speed of light near the surface of Earth is the same in all directions.


THEORY OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY

In 1905 Albert Einstein introduced his Theory of Special Relativity. It did away with the idea of the existence of the ether, and argued that there was no absolute frame of reference. His theory was based around two clear propositions: First postulate: The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference – the Principle of Special Relativity. Second postulate: The speed of light has the same value, c, in all inertial frames. It does not depend on either the speed of the source or the speed of the observer. The physics based on these postulates has become known as special relativity. The second postulate completely contradicts Newtonian relativity, and seems to go against common logic. Newtonian relativity tells us that if we are seated on a train going 20 ms-1 and we throw a ball in the direction of travel also at 20 ms-1, then the ball relative to the ground would be travelling at 40 ms-1. If light conformed to Newtonian relativity we would expect light to go faster or slower depending upon whether we are moving towards or away from the source, but all experiments show that this is not the case. Compare this with the findings of Michelson and Morley. The speed of light in a vacuum is 3.00 x 108 ms-1 regardless of the speed of the observer or the source. Newtonian physics works as a very good approximation only for velocities much less than c. The faster something moves, the more obvious it is that the Newtonian world does not match reality.


Consider the following thought experiment: Imagine that you’re on a spaceship (top diagram) and holding a laser so it shoots a beam of light directly up, striking a mirror you’ve placed on the ceiling. The light beam then comes back down and strikes a detector. You see a beam of light go up, bounce off the mirror, and come straight down.

The bottom diagram depicts another observer, who we’ll call Lucy, who is in a stationary craft observing the moving craft go by. In this stationary craft, Lucy sees the beam travel along a diagonal path. However, the spaceship is traveling at a constant speed of half the speed of light (0.5c). According to Einstein, this makes no difference to you — you can’t even tell that you’re moving. However, if astronaut Lucy was spying on you, as in the bottom of the figure, it would be a different story. Lucy would see your beam of light travel upward along a diagonal path, strike the mirror, and then travel downward along a diagonal path before striking the detector. In other words, you and Lucy would see different paths for the light and, more importantly, those paths aren’t even the same length. This means that the time the beam takes to go from the laser to the mirror to the detector must also be different for you and Amber so that you both agree on the speed of light. This phenomenon is known as time dilation, where the time on a ship moving very quickly appears to pass slower than on Earth. If you apply Lorentz transformation equations (later in this booklet), the speed of light works out exactly the same for both observers.


QUESTION 7 According to Einstein’s theory of special relativity, which one of the following does not depend on the motion of the observer? A The order of occurrence of two events. B The time interval between two events. C The distance between two points. D The speed of light. QUESTION 8 Is it possible for light to travel slower than 3.0 x 108 ms-1? Solution Here we need to emphasise that Einstein’s 1905 theory of relativity deals only with frames of reference in constant relative motion (that is, inertial frames of reference). For this reason it is called the special theory of relativity. Special relativity does not deal with accelerated situations. Ten years later, Einstein put forward the general theory of relativity, which does deal with situations in which acceleration occurs (that is, with non-inertial frames of reference). As part of this theory he showed that in an accelerated frame of reference, time also slows down. The General Theory of Relativity is not part of the current VCE course.


TIME DILATION This equation:

2

2

1c

v

tt o

−

=

is known as the time dilation formula. It is called time dilation because time intervals measured by a clock in a reference frame at rest with the observer are always greater than the time intervals measured by the clock in a reference frame in motion relative to the observer. This is an unavoidable consequence of the result that all observers will measure the same speed for light. The time dilation factor appears frequently in relativity so it is convenient to give it a symbol of its own, γ (gamma).

i.e.

2

2

1

1

c

v−

=γ (this is also called the Lorentz factor)

We can therefore simply write t = toγ. Where: t is the time measured by an observer who sees the event as moving. to is the time measured by an observer who is at rest relative to the event being measured. It can also be called the proper time.

A quick inspection of the expression for γ will convince you that, as 2

2

c

v is almost zero for

normal speeds we are likely to encounter on a daily basis, γ is normally very close to one. So for ordinary speeds, time dilation is not an issue. A useful rearrangement of this relationship is:

2

11γ

−= cv


As the denominator of the expression for gamma must be equal to or less than 1, gamma is always equal to or greater than 1 (although extremely close to 1 at any normal speed). Thus time in the moving frame, as seen from the stationary frame, will always appear to elapse more slowly (t ≥ to). Because it was H. A. Lorentz who first introduced the factor γ in an attempt to explain the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment, it is often known as the Lorentz factor. Gamma, for a speed of 0.5 c, is about 1.155 s. In other words, there is a 15.5% difference in the time intervals measured by two observers – one at rest relative to the event and the other with a relative motion of 0.5 c. Unlike in Newtonian physics, in special relativity we find that time intervals are not invariant but relative to the observer.

This graph demonstrates how the Lorentz factor varies according to the speed of the moving frame. There are two three minute clock timers, one on a spacecraft travelling at 0.5 c, and the other kept on Earth. At the expiration of 3.0 minutes in the spacecraft it is found that 3 min 28 sec has elapsed on earth. Those on Earth think it is the astronaut’s clock that is running slow because he is in motion relative to them. To summarise, it is often said ‘moving clocks run slow’. Note that to is used to time the event in the reference frame in which it is at rest; t is the time for the same event from a reference frame in relative motion. In general, to is referred to as proper time, not because it is any more correct than t but because it belongs to the event (as in ‘property’). Proper time intervals are always measured to be shorter than any other time intervals. Remember that time dilation is about measurements in different inertial frames; it is a result of relative movement between the frames.


Motion Makes Clocks Run Slowly!!

EXAMPLE 2 One of the many subatomic particles discovered in the last 50 years is the mu-meson. In laboratories, they have been found to have an average life of 2.3 × 10–6 s. They have also been discovered arising from interactions between cosmic rays and air molecules high in the atmosphere, at an elevation about 10 000 m. These mu-mesons have very high velocities of above 0.999 c. Will any of these mu-mesons reach the ground? Solution The average life of the mu-mesons will appear longer relative to the stationary observer on the ground. to is the proper time recorded in the frame of reference of the mu-mesons, and t is the time recorded in the frame of reference of Earth.

2

2

1c

v

tt o

−

=

and since 999.0=c

v

2

6

999.01103.2

−×=

−

t

st 5101.5 −×= From an Earth reference point of view, the mu-mesons would appear to exist for 5.1 x 10-5 seconds, but to the mu-meson itself, it only exists for 2.3 x 10–6 seconds.


Using a simple speed relationship, we can find the time it would take a mu-meson to travel the 10,000 m at 0.999 c.

distancespeed

time=

therefore,

58

10000 3.3 100.999 3.00 10

distancetime seconds

speed−= = = ×

× ×

This time is less than the measured lifetime of the mu-meson, therefore the mu-mesons will be detected on the ground. Global positioning systems depend on satellites moving in orbit. Nanosecond accuracy is required for the GPS but the timing would be out by more than 30 microseconds if Newtonian physics was used which would give inaccuracies of up to a kilometre. To achieve a high degree of accuracy, it has to compensate for relativistic effects including time dilation. Time dilation has been experimentally demonstrated. Using two identical and extremely accurate clocks, one was placed in an orbiting satellite and the other remained on earth. Comparison some time later revealed the clock on the rapidly moving satellite was slow compared to the clock remaining on Earth.

QUESTION 9 A deep space traveller moving at 0.25 c sends a ten second radio transmission to a space station that he is approaching. How long is the radio signal that is received at the space station? A 12.0s B 10.3s C 10.0s D 9.7s


A spacecraft takes off on a trip to a distant star system 25 light years away at a speed, relative to earth of 0.995 c. Upon arrival it returns to Earth at a similar speed.

QUESTION 10 What is the value of gamma? (the Lorentz factor) A γ = 1.0 B γ = 5.0 C γ = 10.0 D γ = 20.0 QUESTION 11 How long in Earth’s frame did it take the craft to reach the star system? A 24.5 yrs B 25.0 yrs C 25.1 yrs D 50 yrs QUESTION 12 How long does it take the traveller in his reference frame to reach the star system? A 2.5 yrs B 24.5 yrs C 25.0 yrs D 25.5 yrs


QUESTION 13 How long did the trip take the traveller? A 5.0 yrs B 10 yrs C 50.0 yrs D 51 yrs QUESTION 14 If the traveller left a twin back on earth, what would be the age difference upon return of the craft to earth? A 5.0 yrs B 45.2 yrs C 50 yrs D no difference


SIMULTANEOUS EVENTS Measurement of time in different reference frames produces interesting effects on what may normally be considered to be simultaneous events. What may be seen as simultaneous events in one inertial frame may be seen to be not simultaneous when viewed from another frame of reference. This became known as the relativity of simultaneity. In the following example, a light is positioned midway between the ends of a train carriage. Two sensors are positioned at each end, each triggering a green light which is used to indicate when the light reaches the end of the carriage.

(from Nelson Physics VCE Units 3 and 4 3rd Ed)

A thought experiment consisting of one observer midway inside a speeding train carriage and another observer standing on a platform as the train moves past. A flash of light is given off at the centre of the carriage just as the two observers pass each other. The observer onboard the train sees the front and back of the carriage at fixed distances from the source of light and as such, according to this observer, the light will reach the front and back of the carriage at the same time.

The train-and-platform experiment from the reference frame of an observer onboard the train. Each sensor would be triggered at the same timesensor and the green indicator lights switch on together.

velocity


The observer standing on the platform, on the other hand, sees the rear of the carriage moving (catching up) toward the point at which the flash was given off and the front of the carriage moving away from it. As the speed of light is finite and the same in all directions for all observers, the light headed for the back of the train will have less distance to cover than the light headed for the front. Thus, the flashes of light will strike the ends of the carriage at different times. In this reference frame sensor A is rushing towards the light coming from the central light and will therefore be triggered first. Sensor B is moving away from the light waves and takes longer to be triggered.

Reference frame of an observer standing on the platform (length contraction not depicted). The simultaneous events in the reference frame of the train are not simultaneous outside the train!


LENGTH CONTRACTION If time measurements are different relative to different inertial frames, what happens to measurements of space or length? The length of objects moving at relativistic speeds undergoes a contraction along the dimension of motion. An observer at rest (relative to the moving object) would observe the moving object to be shorter in length. That is to say, that an object at rest might be measured to be 20 metres long; yet the same object when moving at relativistic speeds relative to the observer/measurer would have a measured length which is less than 20 m. The object is actually contracted in length as seen from the stationary reference frame. The amount of contraction of the object is dependent upon the object's speed relative to the observer. There is no contraction in length at right angles to the motion; therefore other dimensions like width and height are not affected by this contraction. If the fast moving object was a spacecraft, the dimensions of the craft to an observer inside it would appear to be exactly the same as before the journey commenced.

2

2

1c

vL

LL o

o −==γ

This equation is known as the Lorentz contraction.

The term proper length of an object, is the length measured by an observer at rest relative to the object.


EXAMPLE 3 The space shuttle travels at close to 8000 ms–1. Imagine that as it travels east–west it is to take a photograph of Australia, which is close to 4000 km wide. Because of its speed, the space camera will see everything on Earth slightly contracted. (a) About how much less than 4000 km will Australia appear to be in this photograph? (b) Will the north–south dimension of Australia be smaller as well? Solution

(a)

2

2

1

1

c

v−

=γ

( )28

2

10380001

1

×−

=γ = 1.00000000036

≈×=60000000003.1

104 6

L 3 mm less than the 4000 km

(b) Only measurements in the direction of motion are affected. Motion is perpendicular to the north–south direction, so this dimension is not affected.

A moving object will appear shorter, or appear to travel less distance, by the factor γ.

Einstein’s length contraction equation: γ

oLL = .

QUESTION 15 Which one of the following is the best description of the proper length of an object travelling with constant velocity? A The length when measured by any observer at the same location. B The length when measured by an observer at rest relative to the object. C The length when both ends of the object are measured at the same time. D The length when measured with a proper standard measuring stick. QUESTION 16 Which of the following statements about proper length is the most accurate? A The proper length of an object can only be measured by an observer who is moving

relative to the object. B The proper length of an object is sometimes less than another measure of the length of

the object, and sometimes greater than or equal to another measure of the length of the object.

C The proper length of an object is always less than another measure of the length of the object.

D The proper length of an object is always greater than or equal to another measure of the length of the object.


QUESTION 17 Two spaceships, Discovery and Enterprise, are both travelling relative to an inertial frame of reference at 0.8 c in the same direction. Spaceship Discovery shines a light beam forward towards Enterprise as shown.

What is the speed of the light beam according to the captain on spaceship Enterprise? A 0.2 c B 0.8 c C c D 1.8 c QUESTION 18 On a stationary outpost in deep space Jim observes a spacecraft heading straight towards him at high speed (0.9c). When the spacecraft is 1000 km away (as measured by Jim), the pilot sends a flash of light. Which of the following is closest to the time that the flash takes to reach the post as measured by Jim? A 1.0 milliseconds B 1.8 milliseconds C 3.3 milliseconds D 3.8 milliseconds QUESTION 19 The pilot of the spacecraft, Allen, measures the distance between himself and the outpost at exactly the same time that he sends the flash of light. Which of the following is closest to the distance that he measures? A 440 km B 900 km C 1000 km D 2300 km


QUESTION 20 If we observe a speeding rocket ship we find that (one or more): A Its clocks seem to be going fast. B Its clocks seem to be going slow. C Its length appears to be shorter than normal. D Its length appears to be longer than normal. Solution QUESTION 21 In deep space, two spacecrafts are heading directly towards their home base. Spacecraft X passes spacecraft Y at a relative speed of 0.6c. At the instant both craft are alongside each other, both send a radio message to their home base. Which of the following statements about the arrival time of the message received at the home base is correct? A The signal from craft X will arrive before the signal from craft Y. B The signal from craft Y will arrive before the signal from craft X. C Craft X has a value of γ = 1.45 and this will mean that its signal will arrive about 45%

sooner than the signal from craft Y. D Both signals will arrive at the same time. QUESTION 22 Two cars are approaching an intersection from opposite directions. Car A is coming from the north, and car B approaches from the south. A strong wind is blowing from north to south. At a particular instant they are both 100 m from the intersection and travelling at the same speed, which is only slightly slower than the wind speed. Which of the following best describes which signal arrives first at the intersection. A The sound from car A arrives first. B The sound from car B arrives first. C The sound from both cars arrives at the intersection at the same time. D The sound signal from car B never reaches the intersection. QUESTION 23 If we observe a speeding rocket ship we find that (one or more): A All its dimensions appear smaller. B All its dimensions appear normal. C Its width appears smaller. D Its width appears normal.


QUESTION 24 George speeds along in his rocket ship and passes Henry at 0.9 c who happens to be looking out the window of his space station. George holds a one metre ruler parallel to the direction of his velocity. (a) What is the length of the ruler as seen by George? (b) What is the length of the ruler as measured by Henry? Solution QUESTION 25 An alien spacecraft travels through the atmosphere at very high speed and perpendicular to the ground. Just before it crashes on Earth it goes past the top of a 150 m tall tower. It measures the height of the tower to be only 100 m. Which of the following options is the best estimate for the speed of the spacecraft: A 0.57 c B 0.75 c C 0.82 c D 0.90 c


A space mission is planned to a distant star 12 light years away. The spacecraft will average a velocity of 0.5 c to get there.

QUESTION 26 What distance away from Earth will the star system be from the perspective of the spacecraft crew? A 6 light yrs B 10.4 light yrs C 12 light yrs D 24 light yrs QUESTION 27 How long will the journey take from the perspective of the Earth-based command unit? A 10.4 years B 12 years C 20.8 years D 24 years QUESTION 28 How long will the journey take according to the crew of the craft? A 10.4 years B 12 years C 20.8 years D 24 years


RELATIVE MASS We have already discussed length and time as relative values. The third relative quantity to consider is mass. Einstein argued that the mass of an object will be measured to be greater as its speed increases. The relationship that demonstrates this is:

2

2

1c

v

mm o

−

=

or could be considered as: omm γ= .

The term mo is known as the rest mass as measured in a stationary inertial reference frame; m is the measurement of the mass of the object in a reference frame that is moving at velocity v relative to the stationary frame. This relationship demonstrates that as an object’s velocity approaches the speed of light, its mass will greatly increase.

As v approaches c, the term 2

2

1c

v− approaches zero.

What happens if the speed of the moving object exceeds c? If this is indeed possible, the

term 2

2

1c

v− would be the square root of a negative number which is invalid. Could it be

that the speed of a moving object cannot exceed the speed of light? Another way of looking at this is to consider that as it gets faster it gets heavier, therefore giving it more inertia and making it get harder to move. As the object approaches the speed of light, the mass of the object approaches infinity.


EXAMPLE 4 What is the relativistic mass of an electron whose speed is measured to be 2.0 x 108 ms-1? (Note the rest mass of an electron is 9.109 x 10-31 kg.) Solution

2

2

1c

v

mm o

−

=

=

( )( )28

28

31

103

100.21

10109.9

×

×−

× −

= 2

31

67.01

10109.9

−

× −

= 1.22 x 10-30 kg

As demonstrated the mass of a rapidly moving body increases. This has a number of implications in devices involving high speed electrons such as cathode ray tubes, particle accelerators and the synchrotron. With the synchrotron (which is a Detailed Study topic in Unit 4) electrons are accelerated in a circular path. We know from our studies of motion that the turning force is given by

r

mvFc

2

= . In order to maintain a fixed radius path at very high speeds, relativistic changes

to mass need to be taken into account, in other words, mass is also a variable. As mass increases, so too must the turning force. The relativistic increase in mass of the electrons in a TV tube needs to be taken into account by the engineers who design TVs or the picture would be small and distorted.


QUESTION 29 According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, the relativistic mass, m, of a body of rest mass mo, depends on its speed. Which one of the curves below best shows how the relativistic mass varies with speed?

QUESTION 30 What is the relativistic mass of an electron travelling at 0.9 c? The mass of a stationary electron is 9.1 x 10-31 kg. A 2.1 x 10-30kg B 9.1 x 10-30kg C 2.1 x 10-31kg D 9.1 x 10-31kg QUESTION 31 What is the relativistic mass of an electron travelling at 0.99 c? A 2.1 x 10-31kg B 2.1 x 10-30kg C 6.45 x 10-30kg D 9.1 x 10-29kg


QUESTION 32 How many times heavier is an electron travelling at 0.999 c compared to an electron at rest? A 10 B 22.4 C 25.6 D 1000 QUESTION 33 If a spaceship is travelling at 99% of the speed of light, why can’t it simply turn on its engine and accelerate through and beyond the speed of light? Solution


MASS — ENERGY Mass-energy equivalence is a consequence of special relativity. Einstein expressed the kinetic energy of an object as:

( ) 21 cmKE o−= γ

which can be rearranged as:

This equation shows that mass has energy and that energy has mass, and that energy is released when mass is lost. Conservation of energy implies that any situation where there is a decrease in mass of particles, there must be an accompanied increase in kinetic energies of the particles, such as a nuclear reaction. Similarly, the mass of an object can be increased by taking in kinetic energies.

EXAMPLE 5 The rest mass-energy of an electron is 8.2 x 10-14 J. An electron moves fast enough so its total mass-energy increases by 30%. (a) What is the kinetic energy of the moving electron? (b) What is the speed of the moving electron? Solution (a) Total mass-energy = kinetic energy + rest mass-energy KE = 30% of 8.2 x 10-14

= 0.3 x 8.2 x 10-14

= 2.5 x 10-14J

(b) 2

11γ

−= cv and 3.1=γ

23.111 −= cv

cv 64.0=


A little rearranging leads to the equation: oF t m vγ=

That is, the impulse as we see it in our frame is equal to γ times the Newtonian momentum. We can interpret this as meaning that the momentum can be seen as:

o oP m v Pγ γ= =

where Po is the momentum (mv) as we would see it in classical mechanics. This provides further evidence that speed cannot exceed the speed of light.

EXAMPLE 6 What impulse is needed to bring a rocket ship of mass 2000 kg to 0.99 c? Solution

2

2

1

1

c

v−

=γ

09.799.01

12

=−

=γ

Since 1128 102.4100.399.0200009.7 −×=××××== kgmsvmP γ

In a nuclear bomb a few grams of mass are lost with the energy as the uranium undergoes fission, releasing the equivalent of hundreds of gigajoules (1012 J) of energy. Millions of tonnes of TNT (chemical) explosive would be required to produce this much energy.


QUESTION 34 In a particle accelerator, an alpha particle of mass 6.64 × 10–27 kg is accelerated to high speed from rest. The total amount of work done on the alpha particle is equal to 7.71 × 10–10 J. Which one of the following is closest to its final speed? A 0.80c B 0.85c C 0.90c D 0.95c QUESTION 35 A stationary proton has a rest mass energy of 1.50 x 10-10J. When a proton is accelerated from a speed of γ = 1.05 to a speed of γ = 1.10, which of the following is closest to the amount of work done on the proton during its acceleration? A 4.2 x 102 J B 4.2 x 10-9 J C 7.5 x 10-12 J D 8.6 x 10-15 J QUESTION 36 Melbourne uses around 200 000 GJ of energy each day. Most of this energy is provided by burning about 100 000 tonnes of coal each day. (a) What loss in chemical mass would there be each day with this amount of coal being burnt? (b) What daily loss would there be in the mass of the uranium fuel if this amount of energy

was produced by a nuclear reactor? Solution


QUESTION 37 Which of the following statements best explains why it is impossible to accelerate particles to the speed of light?

A The kinetic energy of particles tends towards an infinite value as they approach light

speed. B It is directly forbidden by one of Einstein’s postulates. C As particles increase in speed their rest mass tends towards an infinite value. D The length of the path taken increases to infinity.


ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS QUESTION 38 A car is moving at high speed (0.9c) along a straight track and is heading straight for a pole which Jason is standing next to. When the car is 1.00 km from the post (as measured by Jason), the driver sends a flash of light from the car.

Which of the following is closest to the time that the flash of light takes to reach the pole (as measured by Jason)? A 0.75 microseconds B 0.9 microseconds C 1.65 microseconds D 3.33 microseconds QUESTION 39 The driver of the car measures the distance between himself and the post at exactly the same time that he sends the flash of light. Which one of the following is closest to the distance that he measures? A 0.22 km B 0.44 km C 0.50 km D 1.15 km


QUESTION 40 On another occasion, Susan observes the racing car. She is standing exactly midway between two posts, A and B. At the instant the car passes her, the driver sends simultaneous flashes of light forwards and backwards towards the posts. The car is travelling at 0.9c towards post B as shown below.

Which one of the following best describes when the flashes of light reach the posts, as observed by Susan? A Post A receives the flash of light first. B Post B receives the flash of light first. C Post A and Post B receive a flash of light at the same time. D It is not possible to predict which receives a flash of light first. A meteor is heading directly towards the surface of a planet at a constant speed of 0.85c. Observers on the surface of the planet observe it at a time when it is a distance x above the surface in their reference frame. The observers calculate the time that the meteor will take to reach the surface of the planet as 784 microseconds. QUESTION 41 Which one of the following is closest to the distance x? A 105 km B 200 km C 235 km D 380 km QUESTION 42 Which one of the following is the best estimate of the time, as measured by the meteor, for it to reach the surface of the planet? A 1488 microseconds B 784 microseconds C 666 microseconds D 413 microseconds


QUESTION 43 Which one of the following best describes the time of the meteor’s descent to the planet surface as measured by the meteor, and the time as measured by the observers on the surface of the planet? A Only the meteor measures the proper time. B They are both measurements of proper time in their own reference frames. C Neither are measures of proper time. D Only the observers measure the proper time. QUESTION 44 Muons and antimuons are anti-particles of each other and they have the same mass. When a muon meets an antimuon both are destroyed and two photons (gamma rays) are formed. If the two particles are effectively stationary, then the two photons have a total energy of 3.38 × 10–11 J. Using this data, which one of the following is closest to the mass of a single muon? A 1.13 × 10–28 kg B 1.88 × 10–28 kg C 3.76 × 10–19 kg D 5.64 × 10–19 kg QUESTION 45 Scientists observe the path of a particle created in a detector that exists for only a short period, leaving a path of only 5.4 mm. Its speed was measured at 2.5 x 108 ms-1, giving γ = 1.81. What is the proper lifetime of the particle? A 1.2 x 10-11 s B 2.4 x 10-11 s C 3.3 x 10-11 s D 5.4 x 10-11 s QUESTION 46 A spaceship is travelling through space with a value of γ = 1.04 relative to a stationary observer. Which of the following values of ‘γ’ is closest to that of a spaceship travelling at twice the speed, relative to the stationary observer. A 1.08 B 1.12 C 1.16 D 1.20

SOLUTIONS


FOR ERRORS AND UPDATES, PLEASE VISIT

WWW.TSFX.COM.AU/VCE-UPDATES

QUESTION 1

Away from Earth at 3.0 × 106 m s–1.

QUESTION 2 (a) 128 minutes (b) 139 minutes (c) 150 minutes

QUESTION 3 Answer is C QUESTION 4 Answer is B QUESTION 5 Answer is D QUESTION 6 Answer is D QUESTION 7 Answer is D QUESTION 8

Light will travel slower than 3.0 x 108 ms-1 in media with refractive indices greater than 1.00.

QUESTION 9 Answer is B

2

2

1c

v

tt o

−

=

and since 25.0=c

v

225.010.10

−=t

st 32.10=

QUESTION 10 Answer is C QUESTION 11 Answer is C

25 25.10.995

distancetime years

speed= = =


QUESTION 12 Answer is A

Time for the traveller will seem to go at one-tenth (1/γ) the rate of Earth time, so when he gets there his clocks (or calendar) will say that it took only 2.5 years. This is the time as seen in the traveller’s frame from the Earth’s frame, as well as in his own frame.

QUESTION 13 Answer is A

The traveller perceived that it took just 5 years.

QUESTION 14 Answer Is B

From an Earth reference point the total journey would have taken 50.2 years, whereas for the traveller it would have only been 5.0 years. The Earth-bound twin would be 45.2 years older than the traveller twin. QUESTION 15 Answer is B QUESTION 16 Answer is D QUESTION 17 Answer is C QUESTION 18 Answer is C QUESTION 19 Answer is A QUESTION 20 Answer is B and C QUESTION 21 Answer is D QUESTION 22 Answer is A QUESTION 23 Answer is D QUESTION 24 (a) 1.0 m (b) 0.44 m QUESTION 25 Answer is B


Because the craft is moving relative to the star there will be a length contraction.

2

2

1c

vL

LL o

o −==γ

yearslightc

cL 4.10866.01225.01125.0112 2

22

=×=−=−=


QUESTION 27 Answer is D

12 240.5EARTH

distancet years

speed c= = =

QUESTION 28 Answer is C

yearscv

st o

MISSION 8.205.04.10 ===

QUESTION 29 Answer is D QUESTION 30 Answer is A

2

2

1c

v

mm o

−

= = 2

31

90.01

10109.9

−

× −

= 2.1 x 10-30 kg

QUESTION 31 Answer is C

2

2

1c

v

mm o

−

= = 2

31

99.01

10109.9

−

× −

= 6.45 x 10-30 kg


γ=0m

m

4.22999.01

12

=−

=γ

QUESTION 33

p = γmv, so as v approaches c, γ approaches infinity. In other words, as it goes faster its mass increases and it becomes more difficult to accelerate. QUESTION 34 Answer is C QUESTION 35 Answer is C

QUESTION 36 (a) 2 g (b) 2 g


QUESTION 37 Answer is A QUESTION 38 Answer is D QUESTION 39 Answer is B QUESTION 40 Answer is C QUESTION 41 Answer is B QUESTION 42 Answer is D QUESTION 43 Answer is A QUESTION 44 Answer is B QUESTION 45 Answer is A QUESTION 46 Answer is D

Documents

Physics – Einstein’s Relativity - TSFX · The School For Excellence 2014 The Essentials – Physics – Einstein’s Relativity Page 3 Newton also assumed that physical quantities