Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Pivotal “New England Journal of Medicine” papers 2014
Phase 3 Trial data
Stefan Zeuzem, MD University of Frankfurt
Germany
4th HCV Therapy Advances Meeting
Paris, December 12-13, 2014
Disclosures
• Consultancies: Abbvie, BMS, (Boehringer Ingelheim), Gilead, (Idenix), Janssen, Merck, Novartis, (Roche), Santaris, (Vertex)
• Honoraria for lectures: Abbvie, BMS, (Boehringer Ingelheim), Gilead, Janssen, Merck, (Roche)
Phase III Trials of IFN-free Regimens: Genotype 1
• Sofosbuvir + Ledipasvir ± RBV
• Ion-1: TN ± cirrhosis; 12 vs. 24 wks
• Ion-2: TE (incl. PI-failure), ± cirrhosis; 12 vs. 24 wks
• Ion-3: TN w/o cirrhosis; 8 vs. 12 wks
• Paritaprevir/r + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RBV
• Sapphire-I: TN w/o cirrhosis; 12 wks
• Sapphire-II: TE w/o cirrhosis; 12 wks
• Turquoise-II: TN and TE ± cirrhosis; 12 vs. 24 wks
• Pearl-II, -III, IV: ± RBV
ION-1: SOF/LDV ± RBV in GT1 tx-naive patients SV
R12
(%)
99,5 100,0 99,1 100,0 99,3 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 97,1 100,0
0
20
40
60
80
100
SOF/LDV12 weeks
SOV/LDV + RBV12 weeks
SOV/LDV24 weeks
SOF/LDV + RBV24 weeks
n N
141 142
143 143
143 143
211 212
66 66
211 211
67 67
212 214
66 68
Overall GT1a GT1b
141 141
215 215
71 71
SOF = 400 mg/day; LDV = 90 mg/day; RBV = 1000 or 1200 mg/day. Subgroup results do not include patients who withdrew consent or who were lost to follow-up. Error bars: 95% CI.
Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1889-98
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals
100 100 99 100 97 100 97 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Absence of Cirrhosis Cirrhosis
179/179 32/33 178/178 33/33 181/182 31/32 179/179 36/36
SV
R12
(%)
12 Weeks 24 Weeks
LDV/SOF + RBV LDV/SOF + RBV LDV/SOF LDV/SOF
ION-1: SVR12 by Presence of Cirrhosis
Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1889-98
12 Weeks 24 Weeks
Patients, n (%) LDV/SOF
n=214 LDV/SOF+RBV
n=217 LDV/SOF
n=217 LDV/SOF+RBV
n=217 SVR12 211 (99) 211 (97) 212 (98) 215 (99) Breakthrough 0 0 1 (<1) 0 Relapse 1 (<1) 0 1 (<1) 0 Lost to Follow-Up 2 (<1) 4 (2) 2 (<1) 2 (<1) Withdrew Consent 0 2 (<1) 1 (<1) 0
Single on-treatment breakthrough was due to non-adherence
Two of 865 subjects (0.23%) had post-treatment relapse
– Both had NS5A-resistant variants at baseline and at relapse
16% of all subjects had NS5A RAVs at baseline, with 96% achieving SVR
ION-1: Reasons for Not Achieving SVR
Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1889-98
ION-3: SOF/LDV ± RBV in GT1 tx-naive patients
SOF = 400 mg/day; LDV = 90 mg/day; RBV = 1000 or 1200 mg/day. * One patient achieved SVR12, but was not subgenotyped. Error bars: 95% CI.
Kowdley KV, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1879-88
SVR1
2 (%
)
94,0 93,1 95,4 93,0 92,4 94,8 97,7 95,5 97,7
0
20
40
60
80
100
SOF/LDV*8 weeks
SOV/LDV + RBV8 weeks
SOV/LDV12 weeks
n N
159 171
159 172
163 172
202 215
42 43
201 216
42 44
206 216
43 44
Overall GT1a GT1b
8 Weeks 12 Weeks
Patients, n (%)
LDV/SOF n=215
LDV/SOF + RBV n=216
LDV/SOF n=216
SVR12 202 (94) 201 (93) 206 (95) Breakthrough 0 0 0 Relapse 11 (5) 9 (4) 3 (1) Lost to Follow-Up 1 (<1) 5 (2) 7 (3) Withdrew Consent 1 (<1) 1 (<1) 0
All virologic failures were due to relapse (n=23) – 9 subjects had baseline RAVs, 8 subjects with no RAVs, 6 subjects with new
RAVs 18% of subjects had baseline NS5A RAVs, and 90% achieved SVR12
ION-3: Reasons for Not Achieving SVR
Kowdley KV, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1879-88
Patients, n (%)
LDV/SOF 8 Weeks
n=215
LDV/SOF + RBV
8 Weeks n=216
LDV/SOF 12 Weeks
n=216
AEs 145 (67) 165 (76) 149 (69)
Grade 3‒4 AEs 2 (<1) 8 (4) 7 (3)
Death 0 0 0
Grade 3‒4 laboratory abnormality 7 (3) 18 (8) 16 (7)
Hemoglobin <10 g/dL 0 11 (5) 1 (<1)
Hemoglobin <8.5 g/dL 0 0 0
SAEs occurred in 4 (2%) of LDV/SOF 8 weeks, 1 (<1%) of LDV/SOF+RBV 8 weeks, and 5 (2%) of LDV/SOF 12 weeks Treatment D/C due to AEs occurred in 0 of LDV/SOF 8 weeks, 1 (<1%) of LDV/SOF+RBV 8 weeks, and 2 (1%) of LDV/SOF 12 weeks
ION-3: LDV/SOF ± RBV Safety Summary
Kowdley KV, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1879-88
Preferred term, n (%)
LDV/SOF 8 wk
n=215
LDV/SOF + RBV 8 wk
n=216
LDV/SOF 12 wk n=216
Overall 145 (67) 165 (76) 149 (69)
Fatigue 45 (21) 75 (35) 49 (23)
Headache 30 (14) 54 (25) 33 (15)
Nausea 15 (7) 38 (18) 24 (11)
Insomnia 11 (5) 26 (12) 15 (7)
Irritability 3 (1) 29 (13) 9 (4)
Diarrhea 15 (7) 13 (6) 9 (4)
Arthralgia 9 (4) 11 (5) 16 (7)
Constipation 9 (4) 13 (6) 8 (4)
Dizziness 6 (3) 13 (6) 9 (4)
Rash 3 (1) 19 (9) 5 (2)
Pruritus 2 (<1) 16 (7) 5 (2)
Cough 3 (1) 12 (6) 7 (3)
Anemia 2 (<1) 17 (8) 2 (<1)
Muscle Spasms 3 (1) 11 (5) 6 (3)
Dyspnea 0 11 (5) 1 (<1)
ION-3: Adverse Events (≥ 5% in Any Arm)
Kowdley KV, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1879-88
ION-2: SOF/LDV ± RBV in GT1 tx-experienced pts SV
R12
(%)
93,6 96,4 99,1 99,1 95,3 95,5 98,8 98,9 87,0 100 100 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
SOF/LDV12 weeks
SOV/LDV + RBV12 weeks
SOV/LDV24 weeks
SOF/LDV + RBV24 weeks
n N
82 86
84 88
84 85
102 109
20 23
107 111
23 23
108 109
24 24
Overall GT1a GT1b
87 88
110 111
23 23
SOF = 400 mg/day; LDV = 90 mg/day; RBV = 1000 or 1200 mg/day. * One patient achieved SVR12, but was not subgenotyped. Error bars: 95% CI.
Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1483-93
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals
93 96 100 98 94 97 98 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Failed PegIFN+RBV Failed Protease Inhibitor + PegIFN+RBV
SV
R12
(%)
40/43 62/66 45/47 62/64 58/58 49/50 58/59 51/51
12 Weeks 24 Weeks
LDV/SOF + RBV LDV/SOF + RBV LDV/SOF LDV/SOF
ION-2: SVR12 in PegIFN+RBV vs. PI+PegIFN+RBV Failures
Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1483-93
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals
95 100 99 99 86 82 100 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Absence of Cirrhosis Cirrhosis
SV
R12
(%)
83/87 19/22 89/89 18/22 86/87 22/22 88/89 22/22
12 Weeks 24 Weeks
LDV/SOF + RBV LDV/SOF + RBV LDV/SOF LDV/SOF
ION-2: SVR12 - Absence of Cirrhosis vs. Cirrhosis
Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1483-93
12 Weeks 24 Weeks
Patients, n (%) LDV/SOF
n=109 LDV/SOF+RBV
n=111 LDV/SOF
n=109 LDV/SOF+RBV
n=111 SVR12 102 (94) 107 (96) 108 (99) 110 (99) Breakthrough 0 0 0 1 (<1) Relapse 7 (6) 4 (4) 0 0 Lost to Follow-Up 0 0 0 0 Withdrew Consent 0 0 1* (<1) 0
* One patient withdrew consent after the post-treatment Week 4 visit, at which HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL
Single on-treatment breakthrough was due to documented non-adherence 11 subjects had virologic failure were due to relapse
– 6 subjects had baseline RAVs, 5 subjects with no RAVs 14% of subjects had NS5A RAVs at baseline, with 89% achieving SVR
Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1483-93
ION-2: Reasons for Not Achieving SVR
Ledipasvir / Sofosbuvir FDC label (GT 1)
Patient population
US Label
EU Label Practical
recommendation (Germany)
Treatment-naive w/o cirrhosis
12 wks 8 wks (> 6 MIU/mL HCV RNA)
12 wks 8 wks may be considered in TN pts
8 wks (low VL) 12 wks (> 6 MIU/mL HCV RNA)
Treatment-naive with cirrhosis
12 wks 24 wks* 12 wks + RBV
Treatment-experienced w/o cirrhosis
12 wks 12 wks 24 wks should be considered for TE pts with uncertain subsequent tx options
12 wks
Treatment-experienced with cirrhosis
24 wks 24 wks* 12 wks + RBV
Decompensated cirrhosis
--- 24 weeks + RBV 24 wks ± RBV
*12 weeks may be considered for pts deemed at low risk for clinical progression and who have subsequent tx options
Phase III Trials of IFN-free Regimens: Genotype 1
• Sofosbuvir + Ledipasvir ± RBV
• Ion-1: TN ± cirrhosis; 12 vs. 24 wks
• Ion-2: TE (incl. PI-failure), ± cirrhosis; 12 vs. 24 wks
• Ion-3: TN w/o cirrhosis; 8 vs. 12 wks
• Paritaprevir/r + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RBV
• Sapphire-I: TN w/o cirrhosis; 12 wks
• Sapphire-II: TE w/o cirrhosis; 12 wks
• Turquoise-II: TN and TE ± cirrhosis; 12 vs. 24 wks
• Pearl-II, -III, IV: ± RBV
SAPPHIRE-I: HCV GT1 treatment-naive patients
Feld JJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1594-603
SVR1
2 (%
)
96,2 95,3 98,0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Overall GT1a GT1b
n N
455 473
307 322
148 151
Treatment-naive
Error bars: 95% CI.
3D + RBV x 12 wks
3D: co-formulated Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid
RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d
SAPPHIRE-I: Breakthrough and Relapse Rates
Event, n/N (%)
3D + RBV (N=473)
SVR12 455/473 (96.2)
Virologic failure
Breakthrough 1/473 (0.2)
Relapse 7/463 (1.5)
Prematurely discontinued study drug* 7/473 (1.5)
Lost to follow-up after completion of treatment 3/473 (0.6)
*Patients (n=7) who prematurely discontinued without breakthrough; 2 due to adverse events, 5 withdrew consent/ lost to follow-up.
Feld JJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1594-603
SAPPHIRE-I: AEs Occurring in >10% of Patients
Event, n (%)
3D + RBV (N=473)
Placebo (N=158)
P Value
Any AE 414 (87.5) 116 (73.4) <0.05 Fatigue 164 (34.7) 45 (28.5) NS Headache 156 (33.0) 42 (26.6) NS Nausea 112 (23.7) 21 (13.3) <0.05 Pruritus 80 (16.9) 6 (3.8) <0.05 Insomnia 66 (14.0) 12 (7.6) <0.05 Diarrhea 65 (13.7) 11 (7.0) <0.05 Asthenia 57 (12.1) 6 (3.8) <0.05 Rash 51 (10.8) 9 (5.7) NS
Adverse events (AEs) were generally mild.
Feld JJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1594-603
SAPPHIRE-I: Laboratory Abnormalities
No cases consistent with Hy’s law
Elevations in total bilirubin were mainly transient and predominantly indirect bilirubin
1 patient received EPO; no patient was transfused
Ribavirin dose was modified due to AE(s) in 26 (5.5%) 3D + RBV recipients
Event, n (%)
3D + RBV (N=469)
ALT >5X ULN 4 (0.9) AST >5X ULN 3 (0.6) Alkaline phosphatase >5X ULN 0 Total bilirubin >3X ULN 13 (2.8) Hemoglobin <10-8.0 g/dL 27 (5.8) <8.0-6.5 g/dL 0 <6.5 g/dL 0
Feld JJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1594-603
SAPPHIRE-II: HCV GT1 tx-experienced patients
Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1604-141
SVR1
2 (%
)
96,3 96,0 96,7
0
20
40
60
80
100
Overall* GT1a GT1b
n N
286 297
166 173
119 123
Treatment-experienced
* One patient achieved SVR12, but was unable to be subgenotyped. Error bars: 95% CI.
3D + RBV x 12 wks
3D: co-formulated Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid
RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d
SAPPHIRE-II: HCV GT1 tx-experienced patients
SVR1
2 (%
)
95,3 100,0 95,2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Priorrelapse
Priorpartial
response
Priornull
response
n N
82 86
65 65
139 146
Treatment-experienced
Error bars: 95% CI. Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1604-141
3D + RBV x 12 wks
3D: co-formulated Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid
RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d
SAPPHIRE-II: SVR12 and Reasons for Non-Response
No patient had breakthrough and 2.4% of patients had a relapse
All relapses occurred 2-8 weeks post-treatment
All Patients (N=297)
Prior Relapsers
(N=86)
Prior Partial Responders
(N=65)
Prior Null Responders
(N=146) SVR12, n/N (%) 286/297
(96.3) 82/86 (95.3)
65/65 (100)
139/146 (95.2)
Virologic failure, n
Breakthrough 0 0 0 0
Relapse 7 1 0 6
Prematurely discontinued study drug,* n
4 3 0 1
*Patients (n=4) who prematurely discontinued without breakthrough; 3 due to adverse events, 1 withdrew consent during week 11
Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1604-141
PEARL-II and -III: Paritaprevir/r + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RBV
Ferenci P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1983-92 Andreone P, et al. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:359-365
GT1b naive, 12 weeks (PEARL-III)
99,5 99.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
RBV No RBV
GT1b experienced, 12 weeks (PEARL-II)
96,6 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
RBV No RBV
207 209
85 88
SVR1
2 (%
)
209 210
91 91
Co-formulated paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d
PEARL-IV: Paritaprevir/r + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± RBV for 12 weeks in GT1a treatment-naive patients
Ferenci P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1983-92
SVR1
2 (%
)
97.0 90,2
0
20
40
60
80
100
RBV No RBV
97 100
185 205
Co-formulated paritaprevir/ ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d
TURQUOISE-II: SVR12 rates in HCV GT1 treatment-naive and experienced cirrhotic patients
Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1973-82
0
20
40
60
80
100 88.6
12-week arm
24-week arm
98.5 94.2 100
GT 1a GT 1b
3D + RBV
SVR1
2, %
Pat
ient
s
124/140 67/68 114/121 51/51
3D: co-formulated paritaprevir/ ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid
RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d
TURQUOISE-II: SVR12 Rates by Prior Treatment Response in HCV Subtype 1a
0
20
40
60
80
10092.2
12-week arm
24-week arm
92.9
Naïve Prior Relapse Response
3D + RBV
SVR1
2, %
Pat
ient
s
59/64 14/15 52/56 13/13
93.3 100 100 100 80.0 92.9
11/11 40/50 10/10 39/42
Prior Partial Response
Prior Null Response
HCV Subtype 1a Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1973-82
3D: co-formulated paritaprevir/ ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid
RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d
TURQUOISE-II: SVR12 Rates by Prior Treatment Response in HCV Subtype 1b
0
20
40
60
80
100100
12-week arm
24-week arm
100
Naïve Prior Relapse Response
3D + RBV
SVR1
2, %
Pat
ient
s
22/22 25/25 18/18 20/20
100 100 85.7 100 100 100
6/7 14/14 3/3 10/10
Prior Partial Response
Prior Null Response
HCV Subtype 1b Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1973-82
3D: co-formulated paritaprevir/ ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid
RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d
TURQUOISE-II: SVR12 Rates by Surrogates of Portal Hypertension and Hepatic Function
0
20
40
60
80
100 88.9
12-week arm
24-week arm
97.0
<100 ≥ 100
3D + RBV
SVR1
2, %
Pat
ient
s
40/45 151/163 32/33 133/139
92.6 95.7 84.0 88.9 92.9 96.8
21/25 170/183 16/18 149/154
<35 ≥35 Baseline Platelet Count
(x109/L) Baseline Serum Albumin
Count (g/L)
Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1973-82
3D: co-formulated paritaprevir/ ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid
RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d
TURQUOISE-II: Patients Not Achieving SVR12
Event, n/N (%)
12-Week Arm
24-Week Arm
Patients not achieving SVR12 17/208 (8.2) 7/172 (4.1)
Premature discontinuation 4/208 (1.9) 3/172 (1.7)
Adverse event, n 4 1
Withdrew consent/other, n 0 2
Virologic failure
Breakthrough 1/208 (0.5) 3/172 (1.7)
Relapse through PTW12 12/203 (5.9)* 1/164 (0.6)**
Virologic failure occurred in 17/380 patients (4.5%) 15 of these patients had at least 1 resistance-associated variant at the time of virologic failure
• D168V (NS3) and Q30R (NS5A) seen most frequently in GT1a-infected patients
The significance and persistence of these variants are under investigation
*7/12 were GT1a null responders. **Significant difference.
Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1973-82
TURQUOISE-II: Chemical and Hematologic Abnormalities
ALT elevation • Asymptomatic, transient, and improved or resolved with ongoing
study drug dosing Bilirubin elevation
• Transient, predominantly indirect, no discontinuations due to hyperbilirubinemia
Hemoglobin decrease • Managed with reduction of ribavirin dose in 34 patients (8.9%)
12-Week Arm (N=208)
24-Week Arm (N=172)
ALT >5x ULN (%) 2.9 0 Total bilirubin >3x ULN (%) 13.5 5.2 Hemoglobin (%) <10 g/dL 7.2 11.0 <8.0 g/dL 1.4 0.6
ULN: upper limit of normal.
Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1973-82
100 100 97,1 97,1 97,1
0
20
40
60
80
100
RVR EOTR SVR4 SVR12 SVR24
• Due to interactions between calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and study regimen, modified dosing was advised
– Tacrolimus: 0.5 mg QW or 0.2 mg every 3 days; cyclosporine: 1/5 the daily pre-study dose QD
• No acute or chronic rejection • 1 d/c due to AEs; 2x SAEs • 5 patients (14.7%) received EPO
SVR rates in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV G1 infection receiving ABT-450/r/ombitasvir + dasabuvir + RBV
• No lab abnormalities, except 2 x elevated bilirubin at a single time point
• No virologic breakthrough • One pt had virologic relapse (post-treatment day 3)
Kwo et al., NEJM 2014
• High RVR and SVR rates in F0–2 patients • Well-tolerated • CNI dosing was manageable using PK guidance
established in prior DDI study in volunteers • Antiviral therapy may benefit patients before
acceleration of fibrosis
3D + RBV (N=34) SVR12 SVR24
Day 0 Week 24 To Week 72 CORAL-1: Efficacy results
Patie
nts (
%)
34/34 34/34 33/34 33/34 33/34
Baseline demographics 3D + RBV (N=34) Median time since transplantation 39.5 months Male (%) 79.4 Mean age (years) 59.6 Fibrosis stage F0/F1/F2 (%) 17.6/38.2/44.1 IL28B non-CC 76.5 HCV subtype G1a/G1b (%) 85.3/14.7 Mean HCV RNA (log10 IU/mL) 6.6 Immunosuppression TAC/CSA (%) 85.3/14.7 Mean CrCl (mL/min) 90.5 Mean ALT (U/L) 78.9 Mean AST (U/L) 63.9 Mean GGT (U/L) 170.3
(Week 4) (Week 24)
Putative Label of Paritaprevir/r + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin
Patient population Recommended schedule
Treatment-naive w/o cirrhosis HCV-1a for 12 weeks with RBV HCV-1b for 12 weeks w/o RBV
Treatment-naive with cirrhosis
12 weeks with RBV
Treatment-experienced w/o cirrhosis
HCV-1a for 12 weeks with RBV HCV-1b for 12 weeks w/o RBV (?)
Treatment-experienced with cirrhosis
12 weeks with RBV 24 weeks in HCV-1a prior NR
Other Studies in Patients Infected with HCV-1
SVR12 rates for daclatasvir (DCV) + SOF ± RBV in GT 1
Sulkowski MS, et al. N Engl J Med 2014;370:211–21
Prop
ortio
n of
pat
ient
s (%
)
*DCV 60 mg once daily, SOF 400 mg once daily ± RBV 1000/1200 mg/day
GT 1 (82% GT 1a), Rx-naïve N=82: DCV + SOF ± RBV for 12 weeks*
GT1 (80% GT 1a), prior PI non-responder N=41: DCV + SOF ± RBV for 24 weeks*
100 95
0
20
40
60
80
100
Category 1 Category 2
41/41 39/41
DCV + SOF DCV + SOF DCV + SOF + RBV DCV + SOF + RBV
Prop
ortio
n of
pat
ient
s (%
)
100 95
0
20
40
60
80
100
21/21 19/20
Lawitz E, et al. Lancet 2014 ITT: intent-to-treat;
SMV: simeprevir; VF: virological failure
7% 7% 7%
0
20
40
60
80
100
SMV/SOF±RBV SMV/SOF + RBV SMV/SOF + RBV SMV/SOF SMV/SOF 24 weeks 12 weeks Overall
SVR12 Non-VF* Relapse
93% 100% 93% 93% 94%
2/30 1/14 2/27 3/87 2/87
28/30 16/16 13/14 25/27 82/87
3% 2%
COSMOS Cohort 2: SVR12 – primary endpoint (ITT population)
*Patients who did not achieve SVR12 for reasons other than virological failure
Prop
ortio
n of
pat
ient
s (%
)
COSMOS Cohort 2: SVR12 by GT 1 subtype and baseline NS3 Q80K polymorphism*
*Excluding patients who discontinued for non-virological reasons
GT 1b GT 1a without Q80K 100 100
93 88
95
GT 1a with Q80K 100 100
88
100 96
SMV/SOF±RBV
Prop
ortio
n of
pat
ient
s (%
)
SMV/SOF + RBV SMV/SOF + RBV SMV/SOF SMV/SOF
24 weeks 12 weeks Overall
6/6 11/11 11/11 4/4 7/7 4/4 5/5 13/14 7/8 3/3 7/8 3/3 18/18 38/40 25/26
100
80
40
20
0
60
100 100 100 100 100
Lawitz E, et al. Lancet 2014
SMV/SOF + RBV
100 100 94
100 98 100 100 91
86 95
0
20
40
60
80
100
SMV/SOF±RBV SMV/SOF + RBV SMV/SOF SMV/SOF 24 weeks 12 weeks Overall
16/16 12/12 6/6 9/9 15/16 10/11 7/7 6/7 44/45 37/39
F3 fibrosis F4 fibrosis
COSMOS Cohort 2: SVR12 by METAVIR score*
*Excluding patients who discontinued for non-virological reasons
Lawitz E, et al., Lancet 2014
Prop
ortio
n of
pat
ient
s (%
)
HALLMARK-DUAL: SVR12 With Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir in GT1b HCV
• Breakthrough: 9 (4%) treatment naive, 26 (13%) nonresponders, 20 (9%) IFN ineligible/intolerant • Relapse: 5 (3%) treatment naive, 7 (4%) nonresponders, 12 (6%) IFN ineligible/intolerant • 28 of 73 patients with NS5A-L31 and/or Y93 variants at baseline achieved SVR12
Manns M, et al. Lancet 2014; Jul 26 epub ahead of print
SVR12, % (n/N) Daclatasvir (60 mg qd) + Asunaprevir (100 mg bid) x 24 weeks
Treatment naive 90 (182/203)
Null responders 82 (98/119)
Partial responders 81 (68/84)
All IFN ineligible/intolerant 82 (192/235)
Advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis with thrombocytopenia
73 (56/77)
HALLMARK-DUAL: Adverse Events
*1 patient with confirmed Gilbert’s syndrome met laboratory but not clinical criteria for potential drug-induced liver injury. Patient had grade 3 increased hepatic enzymes and grade 4 ALT abnormality. Patient completed treatment and achieved SVR12. †Most commonly ALT/AST elevations that resolved off treatment (7 patients, 6 of 7 achieved SVR12).
• Serious AEs* occurred in 6% treatment-naive pts, 5% nonresponders and 7% IFN ineligible-intolerant pts
• AE leading to discontinuation† in 3%, 1% and 1%, respectively
• Grade 3/4 hemoglobin < 90 g/L in 0, 0.5% and 0, respectively
• Grade 3/4 ALT > 5 x ULN in 3%, 2% and 2%, respectively • Grade 3/4 AST > 5 x ULN in 3%, 1% and 1%, respectively • Grade 3/4 total bilirubin > 2.5 x ULN in 0.5%, 0 and 1%,
respectively
Manns M, et al. Lancet 2014; Jul 26 epub ahead of print
Other Studies in Patients Infected with HCV-2 or 3
Overall Treatment Naive Treatment Experienced
SVR
4 (%
)
n/N = 2/ 2
30/ 33
12/ 13
85/ 100
100
80
60
40
20
0
93 97 84
93 100 91 92 85
68/ 73
210/ 250
29/ 30
86/ 92
No Cirrhosis Cirrhosis
7/ 8
27/ 45
88
60
No Cirrhosis Cirrhosis Overall
12 Wks SOF + RBV in GT2 24 Wks SOF + RBV in GT3
Zeuzem S, et al., NEJM 2014
VALENCE Efficacy : SVR12
Conclusions • Two IFN-free regimen will be / are approved for HCV
genotype 1 infected patients in IV/2014 – I/2015 • Response to previous (IFN-based) therapy will be
less relevant • Cirrhosis (more granular differentiated) and
potentially baseline HCV RNA are expected to remain as baseline predictors for SVR
• Main differentiation between regimens • SVR and safety in patients with advanced disease • Drug-drug interactions
• Treatment options for cirrhotic patients, patients with renal impairment and those infected with HCV-3 need further refinement