Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Technical Work Group
1
Pollutant Scope and Setting Concentration Levels
June 29, 2016
Pollutant Scope and Setting Concentration Levels
2
Scope of Pollutants • What pollutants and why • Concentration averaging times
Setting Concentration Levels
• How risk-based concentrations are calculated • Inclusion of multiple exposure pathways
What air toxics are included in other programs?
3
Regulated in California
Federally Listed Hazardous Air Pollutants
Regional Concerns
Evaluated by Workplace Safety and
Public Health Agencies
Regulated Pollutants
Fees
Permitting
Reporting
What is the basis for including or excluding pollutants?
4
Monitored at levels of
concern
Modeled at levels of concern
Designated high priority by other agencies
Listed by EPA
Significance to public health
Federally regulated
Based on program structure
Broad Definition
Other states
State specific
Federal agencies
Highly Inclusive
What are the pros and cons for different groups of pollutants?
5
Considerations: • Ability to focus on and prioritize problem pollutants • Flexibility to address new pollutants of concern • Certainty/Predictability • Complexity for users • Workload to update and maintain • Links pollutants to program structure or needs
What are the pros and cons for different groups of pollutants?
6
1. Significance to public health
Monitored at levels of
concern
Modeled at levels of concern
Designated high priority by other agencies
What are the pros and cons for different groups of pollutants?
7
Broad Definition
Other states
State specific
Federal agencies
2. Highly Inclusive
What are the pros and cons for different groups of pollutants?
8
Listed by EPA
3. Federally regulated
What are the pros and cons for different groups of pollutants?
9
4. Based on program structure
Regulated Pollutants
Fees
Permitting
Reporting
What risk-based concentration (RBC) averaging times do
other programs use?
Annual to lifetime duration
• cancer effects
• chronic non-cancer effects
Short-term duration
• 24-hr exposure
• 8-hr exposure
• 1-hr exposure
10
Importance of RBC averaging times?
Averaging time should be relevant to exposure duration
and/or modeling/monitoring period
• Comparing a sample collected over 24 hours to a chronic protective
value will be very conservative, likely over-conservative.
• RBC values generally increase as averaging times decrease.
What modeling/monitoring durations are currently used
by Oregon’s program?
• Has been 24-hour and annual durations
11
What are the advantages and limitations of shorter-
term RBCs?
12
Considerations: • Protectiveness against high
intensity, short-term exposures
• Context for short-term monitoring results
• Difficulty of finding/deriving/maintaining short-term RBCs
Pros and Cons of Shorter-Term RBC’s?
13
Advantages/limitations of using cancer risk as a
basis for short-term RBCs?
Considerations
• Some programs use Occupational Exposure Levels as basis of
short term RBCs, many of which are based on cancer
• Scientific certainty about effect of short term exposure on
overall lifetime cancer risk
14
Pros and Cons of using cancer risk as a basis for
short-term RBCs?
15
Topics for July Technical Workgroup Meeting
discussions:
• Pros and Cons of methods other programs use for setting
RBCs
• Advantages/limitations of adjusting RBCs for cross-media
exposure pathways?
16
Pollutant Scope & Setting Concentration Levels
Final thoughts?
• Any last questions?
• Do we need further discussion in July?
17