19
Pooled EU cohorts – implications of age differences in mortality Marcis Trapencieris 1 Isabelle Giraudon, Albert Espelt, Martina Pejak-Markelic, Robert DeBono, Thomas Clausen, Andrei Botescu, Jozica Selb, Janusz Sieroslawski, Marcel Buster, Joao Matias For presentation at EMCDDA DRD expert meeting October 17, 2013. Lisbon, Portugal

Pooled EU cohorts – implications of age differences in ... · Pooled EU cohorts – implications of age differences in mortality Marcis Trapencieris1 Isabelle Giraudon, Albert Espelt,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Pooled EU cohorts

    – implications of

    age differences in

    mortality

    Marcis Trapencieris1

    Isabelle Giraudon, Albert Espelt, Martina Pejak-Markelic, Robert DeBono, Thomas Clausen, Andrei Botescu, Jozica Selb, Janusz Sieroslawski, Marcel Buster, Joao Matias

    For presentation at EMCDDA DRD expert meeting

    October 17, 2013. Lisbon, Portugal

  • Aim of this study

    � To investigate age differences in mortality in

    a pooled EU multisite cohort of treated

    opioid users

  • Methods

    � Descriptive statistics

    � Feasibility for age-period-cohort analysis

    � APC models with aggregated vs individual data

    � Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort (HAPC) Models

    � Mixed effects models or hierarchical linear models (HLM)

    � Cross-classified random effects models

    � Accelerated Longitudinal Panel Designs, e.g. Growth Curve Models might be interesting

  • APC analysis

    � Impossible to obtain meaningful estimates of the clear contributions of age, time, and cohort to study mortality

    or:

    � conducting of APC analysis is an esoteric art that should be left to a handful of skilled mathematicians

  • So. What about the EU pooled

    mortality cohort data?

    Cohort

    Age (Time)

    Period – available but …

    Cohort – available but …

    Age – available but …

    Country effect

  • Year of entry

  • Length of follow-up

  • Year of birth

  • Age at entry

  • Differences in age at entryOldest drug

    users: NL, NO, ES

    Youngest drug

    users: RO, MT, LV

  • Length of follow-up

  • Age at death

  • Person years of life lost*Per person ES RO NL MT LV CR SI NO PL

    Mean 26.8 37.3 18.9 34.0 34.9 30.7 29.7 25.1 32.5

    Median 26.9 38.1 19.1 35.3 36.3 32.9 31.3 25.4 35.6

    25th 21.7 34.2 13.1 30.3 31.3 24.4 22.9 19.5 24.7

    75th 32.5 41.7 24.2 41.3 40.1 37.2 37.1 30.7 40.6

    * Assumed 65 years of age

    Per country

    /cityES RO NL MT LV CR SI NO PL

    Sum (in 1000s) 24.0 4.1 6.6 1.6 14.6 7.1 3.9 5.3 16.1

  • CMR by country by year of

    entry

  • Cohort-periodMost common cohort

    CohNo.

    Year of birth

    Age at start

    Age at end

    ES 12 ‘66-’68

    RO 16 ‘78-’80

    NL 10 ‘60-’62

    MT 14 ‘72-’74

    LV 17 ‘81-’83

    CR 15 ‘75-’77

    SI 16 ‘78-’80

    NO 10 ‘60-’62

    PL 16 ‘78-’80

  • Limitations

    � The ones Isabelle mentioned earlier

    � Not necessarily the first treatment

    � A few countries have data, though

    � Unable to control for health status when

    entering cohort

  • Summary� Preliminary analysis

    � Mortality rates considerably higher among opioids users as compared with general population but varies by country and cohort

    � Three countries (ES, NL, NO) with significantly older cohorts

    � Four of the younger cohorts (CR, MT, RO, SI) with significantly lower mortality rates (CMR or SMR)

    � Two of the younger cohorts (LV, PL) with as high mortality rates as three oldest cohorts

    � Mortality figures in some cohorts relatively small and aggregation criteria might need revision

  • Further plans

    � Explore use of APC models further in the EU

    pooled cohort

    � Possibly make comparisons even more

    difficult with involving more countries ;)

    � «Synthetic» cohorts if data allows

  • Thank you!Inputs, suggestions, questions.

    [email protected]