Upload
rajeshwary-cool
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
1/30
PORTERS MODEL FORCELLULAR SERVICE
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
2/30
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
3/30
Introduction
Most vibrant sector with highest growth rate more than 60lakh customers are added every month
Airtel is a market leader with 28.09% market share andVodafone on the 2 nd place with 23.56% market share .
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
4/30
IntroductionIndia has a total of 960.9 Million telecom subscribers,
comprising of 929.37 Million mobile subscribers & 31.53Million wire-line subscribers.The Indian tele density now stands at 79.28%.
Rank in world in network size 3rd
Teledensity (per hundred populations) 79
Telephone connections (In Million)
Fixed 929.37
Mobile 31.53
Total 960.9
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
5/30
Challenges Faced by telecom industry
Unlike many countries where the allocation of spectrum is
separate from the grant of license to provide service, in India
licenses are still bundled with the allotment of a certain amount
of spectrum.
Telecom manufacturing in India is not in pace. With only a
few equipment manufacturers currently operating in the country.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
6/30
Market leader AIRTEL
Market Challenger Reliance, VodafoMaket Follower TATA, IDE
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
7/30
Buyer Power High
Buyers in Telecom industry generally land in twocategories: Individual and Enterprise Customers like ITcompanies, Banks etc. There are many number oftelecom providers in the market with big product
variance and cheaper prices which gives buyer manyoptions to select operators and thus have a largebargaining leverage.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
8/30
Buyer Power
Lack of Product differentiation Lack of differentiation among the service provider
Airtel, Relience, Idea and all other companies have
similar prices for similar products and less likely for
any one to maintain product differentiation and
hence buyers have the option to switch over .
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
9/30
Buyer Power
Buyers switching cost
Low switching cost.Low new connection cost.switching has become more easier.Meaning Low switching cost and high buyer power.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
10/30
Buyers information
Buyers information regarding the availability of other
options has become high
Increased social networking, high advertisementsthrough TV, hoardings, banners and word of mouth,
buyers are well informed about the substitute products
with better offerings urban as well as rural areas.
Means high buyer power
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
11/30
Buyers ability to backward integrate
Not much intermediaries between the producer
and the consumers. High Investment required for
backward integration.
Less likely to have backward integration and
hence low buyer power
Buyer Power
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
12/30
BUYER POWER CONCLUSION
Buyers can easily change their service providers.
Buyers power is very low.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
13/30
SUPPLIER POWER
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
14/30
Suppliers Power - Low
Suppliers switching cost LowSuppliers information High
Suppliers ability to forward integrate Low
Medium cost of switching since changing
their hardware would lead to additional cost in
modifying the architecture.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
15/30
Suppliers Power Analysis Suppliers for the Telecom Operators
The suppliers bargaining power has increased influence on the
profitability of the company. Increase in the bargaining power of
the supplier will lead to a decrease in profits or increase in the
price of the end product(Buyer).
There is a price war happening between the different mobile
operators, so even the suppliers are chosen carefully so that they
do not drag down the profitability of the company .So the
suppliers have less bargaining power in this industry.
1.Mobile Tower Companies2. Aluminum Providers3. Other Raw material providers
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
16/30
Suppliers Power Analysis
Mobile Tower companies in India
There are two types of tower companies in India
1.Telecoms owned tower companies
2.Independently telecom tower companies
(ITTC)
TelecosOwned,
72%
ITTC, 28%
Telecos Owned
ITTC
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
17/30
Suppliers Power
List of Mobile Operator and their Tower Services .
Operator Tower Service
Bharti BIL/ITL
Reliance RITLVodafone ITL
BSNL MTNL, BSNL and Others
Idea ITL
Tata Viom
Less Bargaining power because of morenumber of suppliersLittle or no forward Integration
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
18/30
Suppliers Power
Sim Card Manufacturers
Sim card for the mobile operators are mostlyproduced in India and some are imported.
The mobile operators doesnt alwaysprocure the sim card from a single supplier toavoid any delays.
The Bargaining power of suppliers is less
There is little or no threat of forwardintegration .
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
19/30
SUPPLIERS POWER CONCLUSION
Suppliers has less Bargaining power dueto the Presence of many suppliers.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
20/30
Threat of Substitutes - Moderate
Buyer tendency To
Substitute
Relative PricesPerformance Of
Substitut e
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
21/30
Threat of Substitutes
Buyer Propensity to Substitute
Internet subscriber base increasing in India by 18.06%, compared to 10.60% for GSM/CDMA services.
Representations from the industry and from within theDoT to open up Net telephony.
It provides unified access license, which includes
broadband and Internet companies such as Googleand Skype to offer telephony services for international calling and PC-to-PC domestic calls.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
22/30
Threat of Substitutes
Relative PricesInternet Telephony eating into the revenue ofGSM/CDMA telephony.
Performance of SubstituteVoice quality is an issue with internet telephony.Internet voice services also currently limited dueto regulatory road blocks.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
23/30
THREAT OF SUBSTITUTESCONCLUSION
Increasing threat from the substitutes.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
24/30
Entry baarriers -highGovernment and legal barriers:-
There are restriction are been placed by the Government of India and TRAI.This makes new entries difficult to entry
Spectrum License cost- Lotteries, auctions.
Capital requirement:-
Bharti has invested close to Rs. 230 billion to create the cellular infrastructurewith 45,000 towers across the country
Cost of maintaining one tower is estimated at Rs. 70,000-75,000 per month.
If tower is rented then monthly rent of Rs. 45,000-50,000 for active network
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
25/30
ENTRY BARRIERS CONCLUSION
Not much Threats from new entries asgovernment has imposed certainRegulations.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
26/30
INTENSITY OF COMPETITION(HIGH)
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
27/30
Intensity of Competition (High)Competitors are numerous.
Growth is (high)
Cellular service lacks switching costs and there is no major price or offer difference so this locks in the buyers and protects company toraid on its customers buy another
6-7 players in each region
Exit barriers (medium)
Investment is high for starting as well as buying license.
Very less time to gain advantage by an innovation
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
28/30
INTENSITY COMPETITION
CONCLUSION
Companies have cut throat competition.
They to gain subscribers from other serviceproviders.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
29/30
CONCLUSION
This factor makes the telecom industrymoderately attractive for the new playersand investors but companies need to face
Certain restrictions while making a newentry and have to be innovative to staycompetent in the market.
7/31/2019 Porters model for cellular service
30/30