Learning Outcome 1: Produce useful ideas and concepts using Brain Storming (C)

Student’s Evidence Date

Idea generation. Post it notes showing our initial ideas.

Idea generation. Asana task showing ideas on how to move the maglev train.

Skype group discussions and meetings in library brainstorming for ideas and concepts for maglev train.

Idea categorization and Idea Integration. We compiled a few designs that we thought would be most suitable for this project. Each idea was discussed and explained thoroughly and their designs were drawn out in

15/4/2015

21/4/2015

21/4/2015

sketches.

Decision Matrix

Idea Evaluation

With the help of the decision matrix and through discussions as a group, we decided on the fan propelled model as our final project design. We concluded that it meets the criteria needed for an applicable maglev model and it would be able to fulfil the requirements given to us. The requirements include – run on a 1meter long maglev track

– the ability to carry and transport load

- to move forward to one end, stop, and then move backwards to return to original position

28/4/2015Fan propelled model

Electromagnetic propulsion model (utilizing solenoids and Arduino)

Internal magnet propulsion model

Cost 3 2 4

Ease of Manufacturing

4 1 3

Energy Efficiency 3 3 3

Ability to carry load

3 3 1

Mobility 3 5 2

Final Score 16 14 13

We also took into account that this idea is not costly and does not require a huge amount of effort to construct. With these reasons, we concluded that it would be the most suitable and viable design for our maglev train model.

Reflection: When this project was first assigned to us, we stated brainstorming on ideas. I made sure that I got my ideas and concepts through to my group members and at the same time listen to theirs while keeping an open mind. For the idea generation stage, members were able to come up with multiple ideas and we were quickly able to identify which ideas would be most suitable for the project. I felt that for the most part, all group members were aware about the maglev train concept. Any unclear points that members had were brought up for discussion in meetings, skype group discussions and also tutorial lessons by consulting our lecturer or tutor. We always made sure to keep each other updated on the ongoing status of our project, members did a good job of dividing the work and were cooperative in the process. In the future, I would suggest that each member be clear on the concept so that we can all have a good grasp of what is needed for the project. After multiple discussions, we ended up with three designs out of the many that were suggested in the beginning. Each member had their own opinions about which design would be the most suitable. I personally felt that the fan propelled model would be the best for our model as it is fairly easy to construct and can fulfil all tasks that were given to us. Therefore, we all took our time with this part to make sure we all agree on the best design for our model with the help of the decision matrix. As I was assigned largely to work on comparing the different models and outline the decision matrix, I made sure to do research on the various models before presenting these ideas for the group. We sat together and discussed each aspect of the three models to eventually come to the conclusion of which would be the best. I made sure to weigh in on what I thought are the pros and cons of each idea and design. At the end of the day, we all were able to agree on the fan propelled model as our final design choice. Overall I am glad that we were able to conduct many discussions as a group and we made sure to be productive in each meeting. For the most part, participation of group members were good although some did miss out on a few meetings and skype group discussions.