Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
5/26/2016
1
Presented by: Judi Kulus, MSN, MAT, RN, NHA, RAC-MT, DNS-CT VP of Curriculum Development [email protected]
What's New? What's Changed? Urgent Updates
QM Manual v10
2 Copyright ©2015
Faculty Disclosure
• I have no financial relationships to disclose
• I have no conflicts of interests to disclose
• I will not promote any commercial products or services
3 Copyright ©2015
Requirements for Successful Completion
• 1.0 contact hour will be awarded for this continuing nursing education activity
• Criteria for successful completion includes attendance for at least 80% of the entire event. Partial credit may not be awarded.
• Approval of this continuing education activity does not imply endorsement by AANAC or ANCC (American Nurses Credential Center) of any commercial products or services.
American Association of Post-Acute Care Nursing (AAPACN)* is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the
American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on accreditation.
*AAPACN d/b/a American Association of Nurse Assessment Coordination
5/26/2016
2
4 Copyright ©2015
Learning Objectives
• Describe the components needed to calculate each new Quality Measure
• List 4 specific Quality Measure vulnerabilities related to MDS accuracy
• Discuss clinical system practices needed for achieving competitive Quality Measures
5 Copyright ©2015
Medicare Quality Reporting Program and Value-Based Purchasing
2016 Goals
All Medicare FFS Linked to Quality
85%
2018 Goals All Medicare FFS Linked to Quality
90%
Impact Act
QRP
6 Copyright ©2015
What to Know
• Six new QMs posted on Nursing Home Compare
• Revised MDS 3.0 QM User’s Manual v10 posted
• Separate draft manual for the claims-based QMs
• Coming soon! Five-Star manual (July, 2016)
– Phase in of 5 of 6 QMS over 6 months beginning in July
– Excludes: Antianxiety/hypnotic Meds QM
5/26/2016
3
7 Copyright ©2015
Six New Measures Added to Nursing Home Compare
Discharge to Community
Emergency Department Use
Re-Hospitalization
Improvement in Function Since Admission
Decline in Mobility
Use of Hypnotics/Anxiolytics
Short-Stay Long-Stay
Includes Events that Occur AFTER Discharge
8 Copyright ©2015
Six New Measures Added to Nursing Home Compare
Claims Based MDS
Based
Use of Hypnotics/Anxiolytics
Decline in Mobility
Improvement in Function Since
Admission
Re-hospitalizations
Emergency Dept Visits
Return to Community
PROVIDER PREVIEW REPORTS
5/26/2016
4
10 Copyright ©2015
Six New Quality Measures
Reported April, 2016 on Nursing Home Compare (Provider Rating Report)
11 Copyright ©2015
Accessing the QM Reports (MDS System)
12 Copyright ©2015
Get Provider Preview Reports in Folder Titled: “st LTC facid'
Accessing the QM Reports (MDS System)
5/26/2016
5
13 Copyright ©2015
Poll Question #1
Has your facility downloaded your Provider Preview Reports?
a. Not yet, but I will do it right after the webinar
b. Yes, I’ve seen them, but we have not had a QAA meeting about them
c. Yes, I’ve seen them and we have begun QAPI Planning to make improvements
d. I’m still unclear about what these reports are and where to find them
14 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Successfully Discharged to Community1
Measure uses UB-04 claim and MDS assessment
data to identify successful community discharges
within 100 days of admission to the SNF, directly
from the hospital, AND who stayed in community
for 30 days without
• Being hospitalized
• Not readmitted to a nursing home
• Did not die in the 30 days after discharge
15 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Successfully Discharged to Community2
Numerator and Denominator Window
• The numerator and denominator include episodes that
started over a 12-month period
• The data are updated every six months (in April and
October of each year), with a lag time of nine months
• (i.e., the data posted in April, 2016 will include
episodes that started 9-21 months prior)
5/26/2016
6
16 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Successfully Discharged to Community3
Numerator
• MDS discharge assessment, Item A2100 = 01, “Community” within 100 calendar days of the start of the episode
AND • UB-04 indicates resident not admitted to a nursing home
within 30 days of the community discharge AND
• No unplanned inpatient hospital stay within 30 days of the community discharge. (Unplanned determined from the principal diagnosis and procedure codes on Medicare claims)
AND • Did not die within 30 days of the community discharge,
as determined from the Medicare Enrollment database
17 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Successfully Discharged to Community4
18 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Successfully Discharged to Community5
Occurrence Code 70: Hospital Stay
5/26/2016
7
19 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Successfully Discharged to Community6
Denominator
• Entered the nursing home within 1 day of
discharge from an inpatient hospitalization
• Entered the nursing home within the target
12-month period
• Identified by using Medicare Part A claims
• Excludes inpatient rehabilitation facility and
long-term care hospitalizations
20 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Successfully Discharged to Community7
Denominator Exclusions
• Not Fee-for-Service Parts A and B Medicare during risk period
• Excludes Hospice enrollees during the nursing home episode
• Resident was comatose (B0100 =[01]) or missing data on comatose on the first MDS assessment after the start of the episode
• Missing data on claims or MDS items used to construct the numerator or denominator
• Resident did not have an initial MDS assessment to use in constructing covariates for risk-adjustment
21 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Successfully Discharged to Community8
Covariates
See Tables 8 and 9 in the handouts for the list of
claims-based and MDS-based covariates (pp. 9-11)
5/26/2016
8
22 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents with Outpatient Emergency Department Visit1
Determines the percentage of all new admissions or
readmissions to a nursing home from a hospital
where the resident had an outpatient ED visit
23 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents with Outpatient Emergency Department Visit2
Numerator: Number of residents
• Admitted to an emergency department within 30 days
of entry/reentry to the nursing home
• Includes ED visits that occur after discharged from the
nursing home
• Not admitted to a hospital for an inpatient stay or
observation stay immediately after the visit to the
emergency department
• ER visits are identified using Medicare Part B claims
24 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents with Outpatient Emergency Department Visit3
Denominator: Number of residents who
• Entered or reentered the nursing home within 1 day of
discharge from an inpatient hospitalization
• Entered or reentered the nursing home within the target 12-
month period
• Excludes inpatient rehabilitation facility and long-term care
hospitalizations
5/26/2016
9
25 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents with Outpatient Emergency Department Visit4
Denominator Exclusions
• Not Fee-for-Service Parts A and B Medicare during risk period
• Excludes Hospice enrollees during the nursing home episode
• Resident was comatose (B0100 =[01]) or missing data on comatose on the first MDS assessment after the start of the episode
• Missing data on claims or MDS items used to construct the numerator or denominator
• Resident did not have an initial MDS assessment to use in constructing covariates for risk-adjustment
26 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents with Outpatient Emergency Department Visit5
Covariates
See Tables 5 and 6 of the handouts for the list of
claims-based and MDS-based covariates (p. 6-7).
27 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Re-hospitalized After a Nursing Home Admission1
The percent of short-stay residents who entered or
reentered the nursing home from a hospital and were
re-admitted to a hospital for an unplanned inpatient
stay or observation stay within 30 days of the start of
the nursing home stay
• Planned inpatient readmissions are excluded
• Includes observation stays
• Includes hospitalizations that occur after nursing home
discharge but within 30 days of the stay start date
5/26/2016
10
28 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Re-hospitalized After a Nursing Home Admission2
Planned Re-admissions
• Bone marrow, kidney, or other transplants.
• Maintenance chemotherapy and rehabilitation
• Normal pregnancy, Cesarean section; forceps delivery, vacuum, and breech delivery
• Readmissions to psychiatric hospitals or units
29 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Re-hospitalized After a Nursing Home Admission3
Denominator
• Entered or reentered the nursing home within 1 day of discharge from an inpatient hospitalization; AND
• Entered or reentered the nursing home within the target 12-month period
• Identified by using Medicare Part A claims
• Excludes inpatient rehabilitation facility and long-term care hospitalizations
30 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Re-hospitalized After a Nursing Home Admission4
Denominator Exclusions
• Not Fee-for-Service Parts A and B Medicare during risk period
• Excludes Hospice enrollees during the nursing home episode
• Resident was comatose (B0100 =[01]) or missing data on comatose on the first MDS assessment after the start of the episode
• Missing data on claims or MDS items used to construct the numerator or denominator
• Resident did not have an initial MDS assessment to use in constructing covariates for risk-adjustment
5/26/2016
11
31 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Re-hospitalized After a Nursing Home Admission5
Covariates
See Tables 2 and 3 of the handouts for the list of
claims-based and MDS-based covariates (pp. 2-4).
32 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Who Improved Performance on Transfer, Locomotion,
and Walking in the Corridor1
Captures the percentage of short-stay residents who
were discharged from the nursing home that gained
more independence in transfer, locomotion, and
walking during their episodes of care
33 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Who Improved Performance on Transfer, Locomotion,
and Walking in the Corridor2 Numerator
• Short-stay residents who: – Have a valid discharge assessment-return not
anticipated (A0310F = [10]) and a valid preceding 5-day assessment (A0310B = [01]) or admission assessment (A0310A = [01]*); AND
– Have a change in performance score that is negative ([Discharge] - [5-day or admission assessment] < [0]), using the earlier assessment if resident has both 5-day and admission assessments
*Uses the earliest assessment if both submitted
5/26/2016
12
34 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Who Improved Performance on Transfer, Locomotion,
and Walking in the Corridor3 Performance calculation
• Sum of:
– G0110B1 (transfer: self- performance)
Plus
– G0110E1 (locomotion on unit: self-performance)
Plus
– G0110D1 (walk in corridor: self-performance)
• ADL Scores of 7’s (activity occurred only once or twice) and 8's (activity did not occur) recoded to 4's (total dependence)
35 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Who Improved Performance on Transfer, Locomotion,
and Walking in the Corridor4
• Numerator Example
MDADL 5-Day/ Admission
Discharge Return Not Anticipated
Transfers Self-performance = 3 Self-performance = 2
Locomotion on Unit Self-performance = 2
Self-performance = 1
Walk in corridor Self-performance = 8
Self-performance = 3
Totals 3 + 2 + 4 = 9 2 + 1 + 3 = 6
MDALD Score Improves and Adds to the Numerator
36 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Who Improved Performance on Transfer, Locomotion,
and Walking in the Corridor5
Denominator
• Short-stay residents who meet all of the
following conditions, except those with
exclusions:
– Have a valid discharge assessment (A0310F =
[10], Discharge Return Not-Anticipated), AND
– Have a valid preceding 5-day assessment
(A0310B = [01]) or admission assessment
(A0310A = [01])
5/26/2016
13
37 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Who Improved Performance on Transfer, Locomotion,
and Walking in the Corridor6
Exclusions
• Prior assessment is the 5-day or Admission assessment
and coded
– Comatose (B0100 = [1])
– Life expectancy of less than 6 months (J1400 = [1])
– Hospice (O0100K2 = [1])
• Prior assessment and target assessment
– Missing data in G0110B1, G0110D1, or G0110E1
– Residents with no impairment (sum of G0110B1, G0110D1 and
G0110E1 = [0]) on the 5-day target assessment
– Residents with an unplanned discharge on any assessment
during the care episode (A0310G = [2])
38 Copyright ©2015
Percent of Short-stay Residents Who Improved Performance on Transfer, Locomotion,
and Walking in the Corridor7 Covariates • (From the 5-day or admission assessment)
• Age (<=54, 55-84, or >84) (A0900)
• Gender (A0800)
• Severe cognitive impairment (C0500, C0700, and C1000)
• Long-form ADL Scale (G0110A1 + G0110B1 + G0110E1 + G0110G1 + G0110H1 + G0110I1 + G0110J1) (categorized by tercile in the quarter)
• Heart failure (I0600)
• CVA, TIA, or stroke (I4500)
• Hip fracture (I3900)
• Other fracture (I4000)
LONG STAY QUALITY MEASURES
5/26/2016
14
40 Copyright ©2015
Residents Whose Ability to Move Independently Has Worsened1
Captures long stay residents who experienced a decline in independence in locomotion.
41 Copyright ©2015
Residents Whose Ability to Move Independently Has Worsened2
Numerator • Long-stay residents with a selected target assessment and at
least one qualifying prior assessment who have a decline in locomotion when comparing their target assessment with the prior assessment.
• Decline identified by:
– Recoding all values (G0110E1 = [7, 8]) to (G0110E1 = [4])
– Increase of one or more points on the “locomotion on unit: self-performance” item between the target assessment and prior assessment (G0110E1 on target assessment – G0110E1 on prior assessment ≥1)
42 Copyright ©2015
Residents Whose Ability to Move Independently Has Worsened3
Denominator
• Long-stay residents who have a qualifying MDS 3.0 target
assessment and at least one qualifying prior assessment,
except those with exclusions (see next slide)
5/26/2016
15
43 Copyright ©2015
Residents Whose Ability to Move Independently Has Worsened4
Exclusions (Handout p.13)
• Residents satisfying any of the following conditions: – Comatose or missing data on comatose (B0100 = [1, -])
at the prior assessment.
– Prognosis of less than 6 months at the prior assessment as indicated by:
– Prognosis of less than six months of life (J1400 = [1]), OR
– Hospice use (O0100K2 = [1]), OR
– Neither indicator for being end-of-life at the prior assessment (J1400 ≠ [1] and O0100K2 ≠ [1]) and a missing value on either indicator (J1400 = [-] or O0100K2 = [-])
44 Copyright ©2015
Residents Whose Ability to Move Independently Has Worsened5
Exclusions (Handout p.13) (Con’t)
• Residents satisfying any of the following conditions: – Resident totally dependent during locomotion on prior
assessment (G0110E1 = [4, 7, or 8])
– Missing data on locomotion on target or prior assessment (G0110E1 = [-]).
– Prior assessment is a discharge with or without return anticipated (A0310F = [10, 11])
– No prior assessment is available to assess prior function
– Target assessment is an admission assessment (A0310A = [01]), a PPS 5-day (A0310B = [01]), or the first assessment after an admission (A0310E = [01]), or A0310B = [06]
45 Copyright ©2015
Residents Whose Ability to Move Independently Has Worsened6
Covariates (Handout p.13)
From the prior assessment:
• Eating (self-performance): Needs help (G0110H1)
• Eating (self-performance): Dependence (G0110H1)
• Toileting (self-performance): Needs help (G0110I1)
• Toileting (self-performance): Dependence (G0110I1)
• Transfer (self-performance): Needs help (G0110B1)
• Transfer (self-performance): Dependence (G0110B1)
5/26/2016
16
46 Copyright ©2015
Residents Whose Ability to Move Independently Has Worsened7
Covariates (Handout p.13)(Con’t) • Walking in corridor (self-performance): Independence (G0110D1)
• Walking in corridor (self-performance): Needs some help (G0110D1)
• Walking in corridor (self-performance): Needs more help (G0110D1)
• Severe cognitive impairment (C0500, C0700, and C1000)
• Linear age (A0900)
• Gender (A0800)
• Positive vision change score calculated from prior assessment to latest assessment with non-missing value after prior assessment (B1000)
• No oxygen use on prior assessment (O0100C2 = [0]) and oxygen use on latest assessment with non-missing value after prior assessment (O0100C2 = [1])
47 Copyright ©2015
Residents Who Receive Antianxiety/Hypnotic Medication1
Captures long stay residents receiving an antianxiety and/or hypnotic medication. It excludes residents who are receiving hospice care or have a life expectancy of less than 6 months
48 Copyright ©2015
Residents Who Receive Antianxiety/Hypnotic Medication2
Numerator
• Long-stay residents with a selected target assessment
where any of the following conditions are true:
– For assessments with target dates on or before 03/31/2012:
– Antianxiety medications received (N0400B = [1]), or
– Hypnotic medications received (N0400D = [1]).
– For assessments with target dates on or after 04/01/2012:
– Antianxiety medications received (N0410B = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
7]), or
– Hypnotic medications received (N0410D = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
7]).
5/26/2016
17
49 Copyright ©2015
Residents Who Receive Antianxiety/Hypnotic Medication3
Denominator
• Long-stay residents with a selected target assessment,
except those with exclusions (see next slide
50 Copyright ©2015
Residents Who Receive Antianxiety/Hypnotic Medication4
Exclusions
• The resident did not qualify for the numerator and any of the following is true:
– For assessments with target dates on or before 03/31/2012: (N0400B = [-] or N0400D = [-])
– For assessments with target dates on or after 04/01/2012: (N0410B = [-] or N0410D = [-])
– Any of the following related conditions are present on the target assessment (unless otherwise indicated):
– Life expectancy of less than 6 months (J1400 = [1])
– Hospice care while a resident (O0100K2 = [1])
Improving and Maintaining QM scores
5/26/2016
18
52 Copyright ©2015
Poor QM Score Contributors
• Staff don’t understand the QM scores
• Lack of PIPs for poor performing QMs
• Not all shifts are included in CQI
• Lack of coordination across the care continuum
53 Copyright ©2015
Poll Question #2
How would you rate your facility’s Quality Measure management system?
a) Fair
b) Average
c) Good
d) Excellent
54 Copyright ©2015
Tips to Improved Scores
• Manage QMs PROACTIVELY rather than Retrospectively
• Download and review QM scores Monthly
• Review scores as a team
• Sample audit resident charts
• Evaluate and enhance Transitions of Care Program
• Understand the Reimbursement Implications
5/26/2016
19
55 Copyright ©2015
Tips to Improved MDS Accuracy
• Ensure accuracy of MDS assessments
• Shore up documentation
• Utilize the entire care team
• Code with integrity
QUESTIONS
57 Copyright ©2015
Resources
MDS 3.0 Quality Measures User’s Manual v10
• https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-
Instruments/NursingHomeQualityInits/Downloads/MDS-30-QM-Users-
Manual-V10.pdf
CMS Five-Star Quality Rating System website
• https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/certificationandcomplianc/fsqrs.html
57
5/26/2016
20
58 Copyright ©2015
Resources
Claims-based QM Technical Specifications Manual
• https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/CertificationandComplianc/Downloads/New-Measures-Technical-Specifications-DRAFT-04-05-16-.pdf
Claims-based QM Technical Specifications Appendices • https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-
Certification/CertificationandComplianc/Downloads/APPENDIX-New-Claims-based-measuresTechnical-Specifications-04-05-16.pdf
SNF PPS Proposed Rule • https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-04-25/pdf/2016-09399.pdf
59 Copyright ©2015
Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing (SNF VBP) Program • https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-
Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/Other-VBPs/SNF-VBP-Proposed-Rule-ODF-Presentation.pptx