58
preparation start drscheme set language level to Beginner open in Presentations – length1.ss – length2.ss – icons.ss – planets0.ss – convert.ss add teachpack convert.ss

preparation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

preparation. start drscheme set language level to Beginner open in Presentations length1.ss length2.ss icons.ss planets0.ss convert.ss add teachpack convert.ss. How to Produce the Best OO Programmers: By Teaching Program Design. Matthias Felleisen Rice University Houston, Texas. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

preparation

• start drscheme • set language level to Beginner• open in Presentations

– length1.ss– length2.ss– icons.ss – planets0.ss– convert.ss

• add teachpack convert.ss

How to Produce the Best OO Programmers:

By Teaching Program Design

Matthias FelleisenRice UniversityHouston, Texas

Current Practice in Introductory Courses

• teach the syntax of a currently fashionable programming language

• use Emacs or commercial PE

• show examples of code and ask students to mimic

• discuss some algorithmic ideas (BigO)

Current Practice: Syntax and PEs

wage_per_hour * number_of_hours = total_wage

In you favorite C++ or Java programming environment:

pointer manipulation

Current Practice: Design vs Tinkering/O

• syntax: tinker until it works

• design: tinker until it works, too

• teaching standard algorithms doesn’t replace a discipline of design

• analyzing algorithms doesn’t say how we should design programs

Lessons: The Trinity

• simple programming language

• programming environment for beginners

• a discipline of design: classes of data

TeachScheme!

TeachScheme! is not MIT Scheme!

• not MIT’s Scheme

• not MIT’s programming environment

• most importantly: not MIT’s non-design– SICP fails the normal student – SICP fails to convey the central role of design– SICP has an outdated idea of OO programming

Part I: The Programming Language

Programming Language: Scheme

• Scheme’s notation is simple: – (, operation, operands, )

• Scheme’s semantics is easy: – it’s just the rules of mathematics: 1+1 = 2

• With Scheme, we can focus on ideas

Programming Language: Scheme Again

• simple syntax

• simple semantics

• powerful PE

• rich language

• it’s a lie!

• more lies!

• do you believe this?

• so where are the GUIs?

length1 returns 0, no matter what input

algebraic syntax

more algebraic syntax

an error message concerning procedures,whatever those things are

Syntax is a Problem

• simple notational mistakes produce strange results -- without warning

• simple notational mistakes produce error messages beyond the students’ knowledge

• … and even in Scheme there are just too many features

Programming Languages: Not One, Many

• language 1: first-order functional PL– function definition and application– conditional expression– structure definition

• language 2: local function definitions

• language 3: functions and effects– higher-order functions– set! and structure mutation– begin

Programming Languages

• arrange programming language in pedagogic layers

• put students into a knowledge-appropriate context

• focus on design ideas relative to this context

Part II: The Programming Environment

On to the Programming Environment

• one PE for all language levels

• the PE must allow instructors to supplement code at all levels --- even if the code does not conform to the level

• the PE must enable interactive exploration

DrScheme: Beginner Level

• error message due to restricted syntax

• check syntax

• pictures are values [if time]

• teachpacks

Part III: Design Recipes

Program Design for Beginners

• foster basic good habits

• the design is rational– its steps explain the code’s structure

• the design focuses on classes of data

• the process is accessible to beginner

Design Recipes

to be designedin out

How do we wire the “program” to the rest of the world?

IMPERATIVE: Teach Model-View Separation

Design Recipes

• the programming environment must support extreme separation of view and model

• demonstrate temperature conversion

The Basic Design Recipe

• data analysis and class definition

• contract, purpose statement, header

• in-out (effect) examples

• function template

• function definition

• testing, test suite development

Design Recipes: Class Definitions

• use rigorous language, not formalism

• naïve set theory– basic sets: numbers, chars, booleans– intervals on numbers– (labeled) products, that is, structures – (tagged) unions– self-references– vectors (much later)

Design Recipes: Class Definitions (2)

(define-struct spider (name size legs))

A spider is a structure:

(make-spider symbol number number)

Design Recipes: Class Definitions (3)

A zoo animal is either • a spider• an elephant • a giraffe • a mouse • …

Each of these classes of animals has its own definition

Design Recipes: Class Definitions (4)

A list of zoo animals is either • empty• (cons animal a-list-of-zoo-animals)

Let’s make examples: • empty (by definition)• (cons (make-spider ‘Asterix 1 6) empty)• (cons (make-spider ‘Obelix 99 6) (cons … …))

Design Recipes: Class Definitions (5)

(define-struct child (name father mother))

A family tree is either • ‘unknown • (make-child symbol a-family-tree a-family-tree-2)

Many, if not most, interesting class definitions are self-referential.

Design Recipes: Templates

• a template reflects the structure of the class definitions (for input, mostly)

• this match helps designers, readers, modifiers, maintainers alike

Design Recipes: Templates (2)

• is it a basic class?

• is it a union?

• is it a structure?

• is it self-referential?

• “domain knowledge”

• case analysis

• extract field values

• annotate for recursion

Design Recipes: Templates (3)

A list of zoo animals is either • empty• (cons animal a-list-of-zoo-animals)

;; fun-for-zoo : list-of-zoo-animals -> ???(define (fun-for-zoo a-loZA) … )

is it a union?

Design Recipes: Templates (4)

A list of zoo animals is either • empty• (cons animal a-list-of-zoo-animals)

;; fun-for-zoo : list-of-zoo-animals -> ???(define (fun-for-zoo a-loZA) (cond [ <<condition>> <<answer>> ] [ <<condition>> <<answer>> ]))

what are the sub-classes

Design Recipes: Templates (5)

A list of zoo animals is either • empty• (cons animal a-list-of-zoo-animals)

;; fun-for-zoo : list-of-zoo-animals -> ???(define (fun-for-zoo a-loZA) (cond [ (empty? a-loZA) <<answer>> ] [ (cons? a-loZA) <<answer>> ]))

are any of the potentialinputs structures?

Design Recipes: Templates (6)

A list of zoo animals is either • empty• (cons animal a-list-of-zoo-animals)

;; fun-for-zoo : list-of-zoo-animals -> ???(define (fun-for-zoo a-loZA) (cond [ (empty? a-loZA) … ] [ (cons? a-loZA) … (first a-loZA) … … (rest a-loZA) … ]))

is the class definition self-referential?

Design Recipes: Templates (7)

A list of zoo animals is either • empty• (cons animal a-list-of-zoo-animals)

;; fun-for-zoo : list-of-zoo-animals -> ???(define (fun-for-zoo a-loZA) (cond [ (empty? a-loZA) … ] [ (cons? a-loZA) … (first a-loZA) … … (rest a-loZA) … ]))

Design Recipes: Defining Functions

• templates remind beginners of all the information that is available– which cases– which field values, argument values – which natural recursions are computed

• the goal of function definitions is– to compute with the available values – to combine the computed effects

Design Recipes: Overview

• basic data, intervals of numbers • structures • unions• self-reference in class description

– several different cases [all one recipe]

• mutual references • generative recursion• special attributes:

– accumulators– effects

• abstraction of designs

Design Recipes: Conclusion

• get students used to discipline from DAY ONE

• use scripted question-and-answer game until they realize they can do it on their own

• works well as long as class definitions are “standard”

Part IV: From Scheme to Java

Training OO Programmers

On to Java: What is OO Computing?

Scheme to Java: OO Computing

• focus: objects and method invocation

• basic operations:– creation– select field – mutate field

• select method via “polymorphism”

• structures and functions

• basic operations:– creation– select field – mutate field – recognize kind

• f(o) becomes o.f()

Scheme to Java: OO Programming

• develop class and interface hierarchy

• allocate code of function to proper subclass

• develop class definitions

• allocate code of function to proper cond-clause

Scheme to Java: Class Hierarchy

A list of zoo animals is either • empty• (cons animal a-list-of-zoo-animals)

List of zoo animals

Empty Cons: animal list of zoo animals

Scheme to Java: Code Allocation

;; fun-for-zoo : list-of-zoo-animals -> ???(define (fun-for-zoo a-loZA) (cond [ (empty? a-loZA) ] [ (cons? a-loZA) … (first a-loZA) … … (rest a-loZA) … ]))

List of zoo animals

Empty:

Cons: animal list of zoo animals

Scheme to Java: Ketchup & Caviar

abstract class List_Zoo_Animal { int fun_for_list(); }

class Cons extends List_Zoo_Animal { Zoo_Animal first; List_Zoo_Animal rest;

int fun_for_list() { return 1 + rest.fun_for_list(); }}

class Empty extends List_Zoo_Animal { int fun_for_list() { return 0; }}

Scheme to Java: Ketchup & Caviar

abstract class List_Zoo_Animal { int fun_for_list(); }

class Cons extends List_Zoo_Animal { Zoo_Animal first; List_Zoo_Animal rest;

int fun_for_list() { return 1 + rest.fun_for_list(); }}

class Empty extends List_Zoo_Animal { int fun_for_list() { return 0; }}

Scheme to Java

• the design recipes work step for step for the production of OO programs

• the differences are notational

• the differences are instructive

Why not just Java first?

• complex notation, complex mistakes

• no PE supports stratified Java

• design recipes drown in syntax

Part V: Experiences

Experiences: Rice Constraints

• life-long learners

• accommodate industry long-time

• enable students to gain industry experience after two semesters

• no trends, no fashion

• oo programming components

• until recently: – C++

• now more and more:– Java, true OOP

Experiences: The Rice Experiment

beginners: no experience, up to three years of experience

comp sci introduction:• TeachScheme curriculum• good evaluation• huge growth • many different teachers

applied comp introduction:• C/C++ curriculum• weak evaluations• little growth •several teachers

second semester: OOP, classical data structures, patterns

Experiences: The Rice Experiment

• Faculty with preferences for C/C++ state that students from the Scheme introduction perform better on exams and projects in second course than students from the C/C++ introduction

• Students with lots of experiences eventually understand how much the course adds to their basis

Experiences: Secondary Schools

• trained nearly 80 teachers/professors

• 65 deployed the curriculum, reuse it

• better basis for second courses

• much higher retention rate– especially among females

Conclusion

• training good programmers does not mean starting them on “currently fashionable” tools

• provide a strong, rigorous foundation in data-oriented, class-oriented thinking

• then, and only then, expose to current fashion

Conclusion

• training takes more than teaching some syntax and good examples

• training takes – a simple, stratified language – an enforcing programming environment – a rational design recipe

• Teach Scheme!

The End

Credits

• Findler• Flanagan• Flatt• Krishnamurthi

• Cartwright• Clements• Friedman• Steckler