Upload
omar
View
32
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Preparing for 2017 RA Update. March 2014. 2017 Tampa Bay Reasonable Assurance Update . Annual assessment of water quality and attainment status of chl - a thresholds (TBEP) 2012 through 2016 5-year TN, TP and TSS and hydrologic loading report (2012-2016) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Preparing for 2017 RA Update
March 2014
2017 Tampa Bay Reasonable Assurance Update
• Annual assessment of water quality and attainment status of chl-a thresholds (TBEP)– 2012 through 2016
• 5-year TN, TP and TSS and hydrologic loading report (2012-2016)
• Update Projects Database through 2016 (NMC participants and TBEP)
• Assessment of allocation attainment (NMC Consultant)
• Investigate reallocation, including interim allocation finalization (NMC Consultant)
NMC Key Elements:Everyone participates
All invited to participate in a collaborative process– Public sector– Private sector- industries– Regulatory agencies– Agriculture (FDACS)– Electric utilities– Any entity with a discharge
permit
Expanding Participation• Help in identifying contact information for
entities (> 1 ton allocation) not currently participating.
• Consider entities and CDDs with < 1 ton allocation be included in the “small source” category for each bay segment.
• Other?
NMC Key Elements:Projects Database
Database to track projects and nutrient reductions– RA, TMDL, permits – Project entry is
responsibility of each party
– Database maintenance responsibility of organizer
http://apdb.tbeptech.org
Incorporating credits/debits• Original use: means to track cumulative
progress towards 17 ton reduction goal.• With allocation, each entity may want to
track credits and debits for their own use.
Recommendation: Special NMC meeting devoted to Database, specifically for quantifying credits available.
NMC Key Elements:Participants develop draft allocations
NMC decided to reallocate TN loads for the 2017 RA Update
Questions include:New or expanded sources: is the existing transfer framework to demonstrate offsets or transfers adequate?How to address existing ‘interim allocations’
Recommendation: Special NMC meeting on reallocation (could be paired with Database meeting for a full day)
NMC Key Elements:Pooled Funding
‘Declaration of Cooperation’ – In 2009, all parties signed on to
act in good faith– Agreement to contribute funds to
support technical workNMC participants contribution $6K every 5 years: greater than 1 ton $500 every 5 years: less than 1 ton
NMC Technical Contractor Roles
• Nutrient and hydrologic loadings from all entities
• Hydrologic adjustment calculations• Assess RA/TMDL attainment• Facilitate NMC technical decisions
(allocation, transfers, new and expanded sources, etc)
• Prepare RA documents, with TBEP • Enhance project database if needed
TBEP Roles
Organizing entity (TBEP)1. Organize and facilitate meetings; assessments;
discussions; serve as point of contact2. Maintain and enhance databases 3. Manage technical contractor4. Request and manage contributions5. Prepare annual assessments on progress6. Report to stakeholders, agencies and the public7. NMC technical support, with NMC Contractor
Current Funding Status$63,000 currently available in NMC funds
account (some entities have already contributed for 2017 RA Update).
$200,000 (not to exceed) needed for NMC Tech Contractor for 2017 RA Update tasks, based on 2009 RA expenditures.
TBEP roles currently not supported by NMC funds (estimated at $20K per year). Request $10K per year if budget allows.
Potential Funds
43 entities with allocations over 1 ton X $6,000 once every 5 years =
$258,000
30 entities with allocation 1 ton or less X $500 once every 5 years =
$15,000
Max potential = $273,000
Reality Check
In 2009: 27 entities (63%) over 1 ton contributed
3 entities less than 1 ton contributed
Total contributions: $171,100
Total invoices from Tech Contractor: $230,000
Remaining amount paid from TBEP Work Plans; no longer available due to Fed budget reductions
Budget RequirementsMinimum needed: $200,000 for Tech
Contract (no TBEP)Would need 34 of 43 participants to contribute at $6000 each once every 5 years ($1200 per year)
With $10K per year for TBEP support: $250,000 for Tech Support plus TBEP
Would need 42 of 43 to contribute at $6000 each
Recommended Next Steps• Expanding Participation- ideas?• Special NMC meeting devoted to
Database, specifically for quantifying credits available.
• Special NMC meeting on reallocation (could be paired with Database meeting for a full day)
• Funding the NMC- recommendations from the NMC
Extra slides
Potential Options: Increase by $1000
Minimum needed: $200,000 for Tech Contract (no TBEP)Would need 29 of 43 participants to contribute at $7000 each, once every 5 years ($1400 per year)
With $10K per year for TBEP support: $250,000 for Tech Support plus TBEP
Would need 36 of 43 to contribute at $7000 each
Potential Options: Increase by $2000
Minimum needed: $200,000 for Tech Contract (no TBEP)Would need 25 of 43 participants to contribute at $8000 each, once every 5 years ($1600 per year)
With $10K per year for TBEP support: $250,000 for Tech Contract plus TBEP
Would need 31 of 43 to contribute at $8000 each