Process Design Lecture5

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    1/62

    Multi-component Separations Involving High-Recovery or Sharp Product

    Streams

    Feed: Species Moles/hr NBP, TC

    H2 :Hydrogen(Component A) 18 -253

    C1_ :Methane(B) 5 -161

    C2o:Ethylene(C) 24 -104C2_:Ethane(D) 15 -88

    C3o :Propylene(E) 14 -48

    C3+ :Propane(F) 6 -42

    C4 :Heavies(G) 8 -1

    Products: AB, C, D, E, F, G

    1

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    2/62

    (1) Forsharp product streams, we normally use all-sharp or high-recovery separation sequences to

    separate the feed into products. In such sequences,

    each component being separated appears almost

    completely in one and only one product.

    (2) Key component in an all-sharp separation are

    commonly defined by:

    The light key (LK) is the lightest component in the

    bottoms and the heavy key (HK) is the heaviest

    component in the overhead.

    Definitions:

    2

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    3/62

    DEMETHANI

    ZER

    C1

    SPLITTER

    DEPROPANIZER

    C2

    SPLITT

    ER

    DEETHANIZ

    ER

    Feed .

    (A, B)

    H2 . C1

    (C, D)"

    2

    2

    2 .CC

    (C)2

    2C

    (D)"

    2C

    4

    "

    1

    2

    1

    "

    2

    2

    2 .... CCCCC

    (C, D, E, F, G)

    4

    "

    1

    2

    1 .. CCC

    (E, F, G) "1

    2

    1 .CC

    (E, F)

    21

    C

    (E)

    4C

    (G)"

    1C

    (F)

    3

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    4/62

    (sequence a) (sequence b)

    A(LK)B(HK)C

    DEF

    G

    A

    B(overhead)C

    BCDEFG

    (bottoms)

    CD

    EFG

    C

    D

    EF

    G

    E

    F

    98.0BLK

    dd

    (component Bs recovery

    fraction in the overhead)98.0 CHK bb

    (component Cs recovery

    fraction in the bottoms)

    ABCDEF

    G

    A

    BCD

    E

    FG

    AB

    CD

    EF

    G

    C

    D

    E

    F

    4

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    5/62

    How do you synthesize these two

    industrial separation sequences ?

    Which sequence is better ?

    Does your ranking vary with feed

    conditions ?

    Questions:

    5

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    6/62

    Possible Sequencesfor a 4-Component Feed

    ABCD

    BCD

    CD

    A B C

    D

    (Direct sequence)

    Sequence (a) and (b)

    ABCD

    BCD

    BC

    A B

    CD

    6

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    7/62

    Possible Sequencesfor a 4-Component Feed

    ABCD

    AB

    CD

    Sequence (c)

    A C

    B D

    7

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    8/62

    Possible Sequences

    for a 4-Component Feed

    ABCD

    ABC

    BC

    A B

    C(Indirect sequence)

    Sequence (d) and (e)

    ABCD

    ABC

    AB

    A

    BCD D

    8

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    9/62

    FOR A FOUR-COMPONENT PROCESS FEEDSUBGROUPS

    Process Feed

    First Separator

    Feeds to Subsequent

    Separators Products

    A

    B

    C

    D( )decreasing volatility

    A A

    B B

    C

    B

    B C

    C

    D C

    D

    (A)

    (B)

    (C)

    (D)

    (

    (

    )

    )

    (

    (

    (

    )

    )

    )

    9

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    10/62

    FOR A FOUR-COMPONENT PROCESS FEEDUNIQUE SPLITS

    Splits for

    First Separator

    A

    B

    C

    D

    ( )

    A

    B

    C

    A

    B

    C

    B

    C

    D

    B

    CD

    ( )

    ( )

    ( )

    (

    (

    )

    )

    Splits for subsequent Separators

    (

    (

    )

    )

    A

    B

    BC

    C

    D

    A

    B

    C

    D

    A

    B

    C

    D

    (( ))10

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    11/62

    Sequences of Two-Product Separators

    The Combinatorial Problem:Total number of possible sequences for Ncomponents(products) if only type of separator isused (e. g. ordinary distillation)=

    Number of unique feed and product groups =

    Number of unique splits =

    !1!

    !12

    NN

    N

    SN

    2

    1

    NNG

    6

    11

    NNNU

    11

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    12/62

    NUMBER OF SEPARATORS, SEQUENCES,

    SUBGROUPS, AND UNIQUE SPLITS FOR SIMPLE

    SEQUENCES USIGN ONE SIMPLE METHOD OF

    SEPARATION

    Number of S, G, U,Number of Separators in Number of Number of Number of

    Components a Sequence Sequences Subgroups Unique Splits2 1 1 3 13 2 2 6 44 3 5 10 105 4 14 15 206 5 42 21 35

    7 6 132 28 568 7 429 36 849 8 1430 45 120

    10 9 4862 55 16511 10 16796 66 220

    12

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    13/62

    n-Butylene Purification by Ordinary Distillation and Extractive Distillation

    Feed: Relative Volatility*Species Mole % ()I ()II

    A: Propane 1.47

    B: 1-Butene 14.75

    C: n-Butane 50.29

    D: trans-Butene-2 15.62

    E: cis-Butene-2 11.96F: n-Pentane 5.90

    *()I = adjacent relative volatility at 150 F for separation

    method I, ordinary distillation()II = adjacent relative volatility at 150 F for separation

    method II, extractive distillation with furfural.

    (C4H3OCHO)

    Products: A, B, C, DE and F.

    1.03

    2.451.18

    2.50

    1.17(nC4/1-C4)

    1.17(nC4/T-2-C4)

    13

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    14/62

    How do you get to following industrial separation sequence?

    A

    BCDEF

    Extractive

    Distillatio

    n

    Solvenet

    Recovery

    CDE II

    FEED

    C3F

    CDE

    1-BUTENE COLUMN

    AB

    DEPROPANIZER

    C3A

    1-BUTENE B

    C+S

    DE+ Solvent

    DE2-BUTENES

    Cn-BUTANE

    RECIRCULATEDSOLVENT

    DEOILEREXTRACTIVEDISTILLATION

    COLUMN

    SOLVENT STRIPPER

    14

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    15/62

    A

    B

    C

    DE

    F

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    A

    B

    CD

    E

    F

    ( )II

    C

    D

    E

    15

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    16/62

    Definition:

    Extractive distillation is a form of distillation involving the

    addition of a solvent which modifies the vapor-liquid equilibria

    of the components to be separated such the separation becomes

    easier. The added solvent has a volatility lower than the

    components to be separated (i.e., the added solvent has a boiling

    point higher than those of the components to be separated). Also,

    it is usually introduced near the top of a column.

    16

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    17/62

    Examples of Extractive Distillation :

    Mixture Solvent

    1-Butene(-6.3 C) and 1,3

    Buradiene(-4.41C) Acetonitrile(81.6 C)

    Nitric Acid(83 C) and Water

    (100C) Sulfuric Acid(300 C)

    Meth1 Cyclohexane(100 C) and

    Benzene(80.1 C) N-Formylmorpholine(243 C)Isooctane(99.2 C) and doiuene

    (110.6 C) Phenol(181.75 C)

    Monomethyiamine(-6.3 C).

    Dimethylamine(7.4 C) and

    Trmethylamine(2.87 C) Water(100 C)Methy1 Cyclohexane(100 C) and

    Toluene(110.6 C) Phenol(181.75 C)

    Acetone(56.2 C) and Methanol

    (62.5 C) Water(100 C)

    17

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    18/62

    Example 1 Extractive Distillation

    Normal Boiling Points, C

    MCH 100.9

    Toluene 110.6

    Phenol Feed

    (Solvent)CH3C6H5: Toluene(T)

    CH3C6H11: MCH(M)

    181.75 extractive

    distillation

    MCH(M)

    Solvent

    R

    ecovery

    Toluene(T)

    Phenol(P)

    (Recycled

    solvent)

    Phenol(P):C6H5OH

    (Make-upsolvent)

    CT 7.9

    18

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    19/62

    19

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    20/62

    If :1. T type of two-product separators are allowed.2. Any mass-separating agent is recovered for recycle in

    the separator following the one into which it is introduced.

    Then :

    For example :N = 4 components

    Ordinary distillation only gives

    SN = 5

    Ordinary distillation plus extractive distillation with phenol gives

    1

    !1!

    !12

    NN T

    NN

    NS

    110

    14

    24862

    14862

    10

    4025

    N

    N

    N

    S

    TS

    N

    S

    20

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    21/62

    HEURISTICS

    Heuristics Used in Heuristic and Evolutionary Strategies forSynthesis of Separation Sequences

    Type SeparatorsReference Applied Heuristics Used

    Lockhart (1947) Distillation 1, 6

    Harbert (1957) Distillation 2, 3

    Rod & Marek (1959) Distillation 4

    Heaven (1969) Distillation 1, 2, 3, 5Rudd and his co- General 1, 2, 3, 6, 8

    workers (1971-73) 12, 13

    King (1971) and General 1, 2, 3, 7, 11

    Thomp son and King

    (1972a, b)Stephanopoulos (1974), General 7 plus evol.

    and Stephanopoulos rules

    and Westerberg (1976)

    21

    HEURISTICS

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    22/62

    HEURISTICS

    Heuristics Used in Heuristic and Evolutionary Strategies forSynthesis of Separation Sequences

    Type SeparatorsReference Applied Heuristics Used

    Freshwater & Henry (1975) Distillation 1, 2, 3, 5, 6

    Mahaec (1976) and General 6, 11 plus evol.

    Mahalec & Motard rules

    (1977a, b)Seader & Weaterberg General 1, 2, 3, 9, 11, 12,

    (1977) 13, 18 plus

    evol. rules

    Nath & Motard (1978) General 9, 10, 11, 14, 15

    17, 19 plus

    evol. Rules

    Doukas & Luyben (1978) Distillation 1

    Hartmann (1979) and General 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 16

    Hartmann and 19

    Hacker (1979)22

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    23/62

    Heuristic Rules.

    1. Remove components one-by-one as overhead products.2. Save the most difficult separation for last.

    3. Favor 50-50 splits.

    4. Sequence with the minimum total vapor flow.

    5. Make high recovery fractions last.

    6. Separate the more plentiful components first.

    7. Choose the cheapest as the next separator.

    8. Remove the thermally unstable and corrosive material early.

    9. Perform least-tight separation first.

    10. Favor sequences with the smallest product set.11. Avoid separations using a mass-separating agent (MSA).

    12. Remove a MSA from one of the products in another,

    subsequent separation product.

    23

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    24/62

    Heuristic Rules

    13. A separation method using a MSA cannot be used to isolate.

    14. Favor distillation.

    15. Separate first the components which might undergo undesirable

    reactions.

    16. Set splits fractions of the key components to pre-specified values.

    17. Avoid extreme processing conditions.

    18. Favor ambient operating pressure.

    Nishida, Stephanopoulos, Westerberg(1980)

    24

    H i ti S th i f Hi h R Sh M lti t

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    25/62

    Heuristic Synthesis of High-Recovery or Sharp, Multi-component

    Separation Sequences (Nadgir and Liu, 1983; Liu, 1987)

    Classification of Heuristics

    Method Heuristics (M Heuristics) :Favor the use of certain separation methods under given problem specifications

    Design Heuristics (D Heuristics) :Favor specific separation sequences with certain desirable properties

    Species Heuristics (S Heuristics) :Based on the property differences between the species to be separated

    Composition Heuristics (C Heuristics) :Related to the effects of feed and product composition on separation costs

    Nadgir, V. M. and Y. A. Liu, Studies in Chemical Process Design and Synthesis. 5. ASimple Heuristic Method for Systematic Synthesis of Initial Sequences forMulti-component Separation, AIChE Journal, 29, 926-934 (1983).

    Liu, Y. A., Process Synthesis: Some Simple and Practical Developments, Chapter 6,in Recent Development in Chemical Process and Plant Design, Y. A. Mebee, Jr. and W.R. Epperly, editor, Wiley, NY (1987), pp. 147-168 and 245-260.

    25

    A Si l R k O d d H i ti M th d

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    26/62

    A Simple, Rank-Ordered, Heuristic Method(Nadgir and Liu, 1983)

    a. Decide the separation method to be used :

    M1: Favor ordinary distillation

    M2: Avoid vacuum and refrigeration

    b. Identify the forbidden splits, and essential first and last separations :

    D1: Favor smallest product set

    S1: Remove corrosive and hazardous components first (also : reactivecomponent, monomer)

    S2: Perform difficult separations last

    c. Synthesize the initial separation sequences :

    C1: Remove most plentiful component first

    C2: Favor 50/50 split

    d. Remove products and recycle stream as distillates.

    If not possible, take vapor from reboiler.26

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    27/62

    Rank-Ordered Heuristics:(1) The heuristics are to be applied one by one in the given order.

    Higher-ranked heuristics appear first.

    (2) If any heuristic is not important in, or not applicable to, the

    synthesis problem, the next one in the method is considered.

    (3) If two heuristics give different recommendations regarding thenext split, we should follow the guideline suggested by the

    higher-ranked heuristic.For example, heuristic C1 overrules heuristic C2.

    27

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    28/62

    Heuristic M1 (Favor Ordinary Distillation)

    a. All other things being equal, favor separation methods using only

    energy separating agent (e.g., ordinary distillation), and avoidusing separation methods (e. g., extractive distillation) which

    require the use of species not normally present in the processing,

    i. e., the mass separating agent (MSA).

    b. If the separation factor or relative volatility of the key components< 1.10, then the use of ordinary distillation is not

    recommended. or

    c. An MSA may be used provided it improves .

    d. When an MSA is used, remove it immediately follow the separatorinto which it is used. In other words, always try to remove MSA early.

    HKLK,

    HKLK,

    CT 10

    28

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    29/62

    Heuristic M1 (Favor Ordinary Distillation)

    A LLK Light Component

    B LK Light Key (e. g. 98% of B appears in overhead)

    C HK Heavy Key (e. g., 97% of C appears in bottoms)

    D HHK

    E HHK

    Increasing

    Normal

    BoilingPoint BC or HKLK,

    Heavy

    Components

    29

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    30/62

    Minimumrequiredforconsideration

    ofextractivedistillation

    or

    Minimum

    requiredfor

    considerationofL/Lextraction

    Sounders, M., CEP, 60 (2) , 75-82 (1964) 30

    Example 2 Extractive distillation

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    31/62

    Add nonvolatile component to modifys

    Example 2 Extractive distillation.

    B HNO3

    S

    HNO3BC

    H2O

    CH2O

    SH2SO4

    H2OCS

    H2SO4

    e. g., B = HNO3

    C = H2O

    S = H2SO4

    31

    Example 3 Azeotropic Distillation

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    32/62

    Add component that forms an azeotropewith one or more of feed component

    Example 3 Azeotropic Distillation.

    e. g., B = Ethanol

    C = Water

    S = Benzene

    volatile

    S-rich

    C-rich

    recycle

    BCS ternary heterogeneousazeotrope

    B+C azeotrope

    Cwater

    BC

    Bethanol

    B+Cazeotropa

    32

    E t ti

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    33/62

    Extraction

    B

    B+S

    B+C

    C

    C(+B)

    B+C

    C+S(+B)

    S

    B S

    C

    a B/C distillation

    33

    R ti Di till ti

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    34/62

    Reactive DistillationAdd reactive component to modify s

    C

    SB

    B

    C

    C+S

    e. g., B, C = xylenes: = 1.03S = organometallic: B, CS: 30

    B : meta-xyleneC : para-xyleneS : sodium cumene

    34

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    35/62

    Heuristic M2 (Avoid Vacuum and Refrigeration)

    a. All other things being equal, avoid excursions in temperature

    and pressure, but aim high rather than low.

    b. If vacuum operation of ordinary distillation is required, liquid-

    liquid extraction with various solvents might be considered.

    c. If refrigeration is required, cheaper alternatives to distillationsuch as absorption might be considered.

    35

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    36/62

    Relative Costs of Cooling and Heating at Different

    Temperatures (Berthouex and Rudd, 1977)

    Roomtemperature

    Cooling water

    Ammonia refrigerant

    Liquid nitrogen

    $/Kcal

    Temperature

    Low pressuresteam

    High pressure

    steam

    Fuel oilBurner

    Heating

    Cooling

    36

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    37/62

    -100-200 0 100 200 300 400 500 600Atmospheric boiling point, C

    Recommended Ranges of Pressure and Temperature

    for Separation Operations (Souders, 1964)

    Favor: High P and Low T

    Low P and High T"

    Avoid:

    High P and Tor

    Low P and T"

    Pressureofoperation,

    atm

    100

    10

    1.0

    0.1

    37

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    38/62

    Heuristic D1 (Favor Smallest Product Set)

    When multi-component products are specified, favor sequences

    that yield these products directly or with a minimum of blending,

    unless separation factors or relative volatilities are appreciably

    lower than those for a sequence which requires additional

    separators and blending.

    38

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    39/62

    An Example for Heuristic D1

    Feed :

    Normal BoilingSpecies Mole% Point, TC

    A 25 140

    B 25 160

    C 25 180

    D 25 200

    20

    20

    20

    T

    39

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    40/62

    An Example for Heuristic D1

    Good Sequences for Different Product Sets :

    a. Products : A, BC, D

    b. Products : A, C, BD

    ABCD

    A

    BC

    D

    B

    D

    Product Set for Separation:

    (A, BC, D)

    A

    BCD

    A

    BCD

    B

    CD

    C

    D

    BD

    Product Set for Separation:

    (A, B, C, D)

    C

    40

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    41/62

    Heuristic S1

    Remove corrosive and hazardous components first.

    (Essential first separations)

    also reactive components and monomers

    Heuristic S2 (Perform Difficult Separations Last)a. All other things being equal, perform the difficult separations

    last,

    b. Separations where the relative volatility of the key componentsis close to unity should be performed in the absence of non-key

    components. 10.1~05.1, HKLK

    (Essential last separations)

    CT 1041

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    42/62

    Heuristic C1 (Remove Most Plentiful Component First)

    A product composing a large fraction of the feed should be

    separated first, provided that the separation factor or relative

    volatility is reasonable for the separation.

    hr

    molesb 1

    70A

    20B

    10C

    A 70

    B 20

    C 10

    B

    C

    70A

    20B

    10C

    A 70B 20

    C 10

    A

    B

    CT

    15

    CT 15

    42

    An Example for Heuristics S1, S2 and C1 :

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    43/62

    p ,

    [See Rudd, et al. (1973), pp.197-199, Problem 9]

    Industrial Sequence for Separating Chlorination and

    Alkylation Products in the Manufacture of Detergent

    I. Reactions :

    (Chlorination)

    (Alkylation)

    HClClHCClHC 251222412(kerosene) (chlorine) (keryl (hydrogen

    chloride) chloride)

    C12H5Cl + C12H25 - + HCl(keryl (benzene) (keryl benzene) (hydrogenchloride) chloride)

    43

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    44/62

    An Example for Heuristics S1, S2 and C1 :

    [See Rudd, et al. (1973), pp.197-199, Problem 9]

    Industrial Sequence for Separating Chlorination and

    Alkylation Products in the Manufacture of Detergent

    II. Reaction Products to be Separated into Pure Components

    Normal BoilingSpecies Mole/hr Point, TC T

    A: HCl 1 -85

    B: Benzene 5 80

    C: Kerosene 1 214

    D: Keryl Benzene 1 250

    E: Heavy Ends

    Relative

    Flow Rate( )

    165

    134

    36

    44

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    45/62

    An Example for Heuristics S1, S2 and C1 :[See Rudd, et al. (1973), pp.197-199, Problem 9]

    III. Key Questions :

    a. Species: Any corrosive and hazardous components?

    Split A/BCD (essential first separation)

    b. : Any difficult separations?

    Split C/D (essential last separation)

    c. C1: Any plentiful components?

    Split B/CD (desirable early separation)

    T

    45

    A E l f H i ti S1 S2 d C1

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    46/62

    An Example for Heuristics S1, S2 and C1 :[See Rudd, et al. (1973), pp.197-199, Problem 9]

    IV. Initial Separation Sequence

    AB

    C

    D

    A(HCl)

    B

    C

    D

    B(Benzene)

    C

    D

    C(Kerosene)

    D(Keryl Benzene)

    46

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    47/62

    BC D

    47

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    48/62

    Heuristic C2 (Favor 50/50 Split)

    If the component compositions do not vary widely, sequences

    which give a more nearly 50/50 or equimolal split of the feedbetween the distillate (D) and bottoms (B) products should be

    favored, provided that the separation factor or relative volatility

    is reasonable for the split.

    F(Feed)

    100 hrmolesb1

    D(overhead) 50, 40, 5

    B(Bottoms) 50, 60, 95

    D

    Bor

    B

    D

    48

    Coefficient of Ease of Separation (CES)

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    49/62

    Coefficient of Ease of Separation (CES)

    If it is difficult to judge which split is closest to 50/50

    and with a reasonable separator factor or relative

    volatility, then perform the split with the value

    of the coefficient of ease of separation (CES)

    highest

    ])()log[(

    1

    HKLKd

    b

    b

    dfCES

    Where orDBf / BD / Such that 1f

    T or 100)1( 49

    Fractional recoveries of light-key(LK) and heavy-key(HK)

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    50/62

    components in sharp or high-recovery separations :

    Overhead Bottoms

    LK dLK 0.98 bLK 0.02

    HK dHK 0.02 bHK 0.98

    As an approximation,

    To simplify the calculations of CES in sharp separations, we may

    use

    02.0

    98.0

    LKb

    d

    02.0

    98.0

    HKd

    b

    fCES

    50

    M CES (C ffi i t f E f S ti )

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    51/62

    More on CES (Coefficient of Ease of Separation)

    Separator

    Feed

    100hr

    moles

    hr

    moles

    hr

    moles

    Overhead, D

    e. g., 70, 60, 50, 30, 20

    Bottoms, B

    e. g., 30, 40, 50, 70, 80

    Split ratio

    D/B or B/D 18020

    ,70

    30,

    50

    50,

    60

    40,

    70

    30

    B/D D/B

    (Boiling-Point Difference) or 11 , HKLK

    CES T

    D

    Bor

    B

    D

    1

    D

    Bor

    B

    D

    Close to one, 50/50 split

    The larger the or (-1), the easier the separation

    T

    T

    51

    Examples of the Synthesis of Sharp or High-Recovery Separation Sequences

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    52/62

    Example 1: Multicomponent Distillation Sequencing for

    Thermal Cracking of Hvdrocarbons

    1. Feed Normal BoilingSpecies Moles/Hr Point, T C T CES

    A: Hydrogen 18 -253B: Methane 5 -161C: Ethylene 24 -104

    D: Ethane 15 -88E: Propylene 14 -48F: Propane 6 -42G: Heavies 8 -1

    2. Products : C, D, E, F and G.

    3. Key Questions :a. Products: Any multi-component products ?

    b. Species: Any corrosive and hazardous components ?c. T: Any difficult separations ?d. Moles/hr: Any plentiful components ?e. CES: Any easy and balanced (50/50) splits ?

    AB,

    72

    92 23.0

    5714.6

    401.1

    41 4.0

    19.6

    18.16

    16

    Example:

    CESA/BCDEFG

    = 0.239272

    18

    T

    D

    Bor

    B

    D

    52

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    53/62

    1. M1 (favor ordinary distillation) and M2 (avoid vacuum and refrigeration):

    Use ordinary distillation with refrigeration at high pressure.

    2. D1 (favor smallest product set):Avoid splitting AB (a single product).

    3. S1 (remove corrosive and hazardous components first):

    Not applicable.

    4. S2 (perform difficult separations last):

    Split C/D and E/F last,

    5. C1 (remove most plentiful components first):

    Not applicable.

    6. C2 (favor 50/50 split):

    Split AB/CDEFG with the largest CES = 19.6

    and AB as a single product.

    CT

    CT

    FE

    DC

    16

    6

    /

    /

    53

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    54/62

    CES

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    CD

    E

    F

    G

    19.6

    18.1

    Initial

    Separation

    Sequence

    54

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    55/62

    For separating CDEFG, splits C/D and E/F are performed last

    so that the remaining splits to be chosen are CD/EFG and

    CDEF/G. Split CD/EFG is done first since it has a larger CESof 28.7:

    CD/EFG CDEF/G

    f 28/39 8/59T 40 41

    CES 28.7 5.6

    55

    A

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    56/62

    A

    B

    CD

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    FG

    EF

    G

    C

    D

    C

    D

    EF

    E

    F

    G

    Difficult Split

    Difficult Split

    24 C

    15 D

    14 E6 F

    8 G

    16C

    6C

    ? CD/EFG

    ? CDEF/G

    This sequence performs splits C/D and E/F last are it is exactly thesame as the one being practiced in the industry.

    56

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    57/62

    The second sequence can be obtained by making the split

    ABCD/EFG first, which has the second largest CES of 18.1.

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    ABC

    D

    E

    F

    G

    Single product?

    16C(last)

    6C(last)

    57

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    58/62

    Another Initial Separation Sequence :

    A

    B

    C

    DE

    F

    G

    AB

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    A

    B

    G

    C

    D

    C

    D16C

    E

    F

    E

    F6C

    Last Separations

    CES=19.6(large)

    CES=18.1(2nd largest)

    [See King, C. J., Separation Processes,

    2nd Edition, McGraw Hill (1980), P.718]

    58

    Example 2: Multi-component Distillation Sequencing for n-Butylene

    P ifi ti b O di d E t ti Di till ti

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    59/62

    Purification by Ordinary and Extractive Distillation.

    1. Feed:

    Relative Volatility*

    Species Mole % ()I ()II (CES)I (CES)IIA: Propane 1.47

    B: 1-Butene 14.75

    C: n-Butane

    D: trans-Butene-2 15.62

    E: cis-Butene-2 11.96F: n-Pentane 5.90

    *()I = adjacent relative volatility at 150 F for separation method I, ordinary

    distillation()

    II = adjacent relative volatility at 150 F for separation method II, ordinaryextractive distillation with furfural (C4H3OCHO)

    2. Products: A, B, C, and F.(Example) (CES)I,A/BCDEF =

    (CES)II,ABCDE/F =

    163.2100145.253.98

    47.11001 2

    B

    D

    404.9100150.250.9490.51001 2

    d

    DBor

    BD

    2.45 2.163

    1.18 1.17 3.29

    1.70 1.510 35.25

    2.50

    50.30 1.03

    3.485

    9.404

    DE

    59

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    60/62

    3. Key Question :

    a. Products: Any multi-component products ?

    b. Species: Any corrosive and hazardous components ?

    c. Mole%: Any plentiful components ?

    d. Relative Volatilities: Any difficult separations ?

    e. (CES): Any easy and balanced (50/50) splits ?

    60

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    61/62

    1. M1 (favor ordinary distillation):

    Use extractive distillation for C/D and ordinary distillation for all other splits.

    2. M2 (avoid vacuum and refrigeration):

    Use refrigeration at high pressure.

    3. D1 (favor smallest product set):

    Avoid splitting DE (a single product)

    4. S1 (remove corrosive and hazardous components first):

    Not applicable.

    5. S2 (perform difficult separations last):

    Split C/DE last (difficult extractive distillation), so that the added solvent

    (furfural) can be recovered at the end without having to worry about its

    presence as a contaminant in earlier splits.6. C1 (remove most plentiful components first):

    C(50.30 mole %) dominates the feed, but it is not separated first due to S2.

    Note: Heuristics are ranked in their relative importance according to their given order, e. g.,

    Heuristic S2 overrides Heuristic C161

    Separation Sequencing for Example 2

  • 7/29/2019 Process Design Lecture5

    62/62

    7. C2 (favor 50/50 split):

    (a) Split ABCDE/F first with the largest (b)Favor AB/CDE over A/BCDE

    (CES)I = 9.404 (Split C/DE last)

    (Split C/DE last, avoid splitting DE) A/BCDE AB/CDEf 1.47/92.63 16.22/77.88

    (-1)100 145 18

    CES 2.301 3.749

    A

    B

    C

    D

    EF

    A 1.47

    B 14.75

    C 50.30

    D 15.62

    E 11.95

    F

    Initial

    Separation

    Sequence

    A

    B

    C

    DE

    F

    A

    B

    C

    DE

    F

    A

    B

    IIE

    D

    C

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E