Upload
buithuy
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Process Improvement in the Aerospace Industry CMMI and Lean Six Sigma
Rick Hefner, Ph.D. [email protected]
USC CS510
Agenda
• Current Challenges Facing the Aerospace Industry
• Current Industry Approaches – Capability Maturity Model Integrated – Lean Six Sigma
• Northrop Grumman Approach
2
NDIA Top 5 Systems Engineering Issues (2006)
• Key systems engineering practices known to be effective are not consistently applied across all phases of the program life cycle.
• Insufficient systems engineering is applied early in the program life cycle, compromising the foundation for initial requirements and architecture development.
• Requirements are not always well-managed, including the effective translation from capabilities statements into executable requirements to achieve successful acquisition programs.
• The quantity and quality of systems engineering expertise is insufficient to meet the demands of the government and the defense industry.
• Collaborative environments, including SE tools, are inadequate to effectively execute SE at the joint capability, system of systems (SoS), and system levels.
3 Systems Engineering Update, NDIA Top 5 Issues Workshop. July 26, 2006. Briefing by Mr. Robert Skalamera
Agenda
• Current Challenges Facing the Aerospace Industry
• Current Industry Approaches – Capability Maturity Model Integrated – Lean Six Sigma – Agile
• Northrop Grumman Approach
4
Heritage of Standards for Systems Engineering
5
EIA / IS 632
ISO/IEC 15288
Mil-Std-499B Mil-Std-
499A
1994
1994
1994
1998 2002
1974
(Not Released) Mil-Std-499
1969
(Trial Use) IEEE 1220
1998
(Full Std)
Legend Supersedes Source for
EIA 632
1998
EIA/IS 731
SE CM
IEEE 1220
(Full Std) (Interim Standard)
2002 CMMI-
SE/SW/IPPD
(Interim Standard)
(FDIS)
ISO/IEC 19760
2002
(PDTR)
2002 ISO/IEC 15504 (FDIS)
Standards for Systems Engineering, Jerry Lake, 2002
The Frameworks Quagmire Sarah A. Sheard, Software Productivity Consortium
6 http://stsc.hill.af.mil/crosstalk/1997/sep/frameworks.asp
Two Complimentary Approaches to Process Improvement
Data-Driven (e.g., Lean Six Sigma)
• Clarify what your customer wants (Voice of Customer)
– Critical to Quality (CTQs)
• Determine what your processes can do (Voice of Process)
– Statistical Process Control
• Identify and prioritize improvement opportunities
– Causal analysis of data
• Anticipate your customers/ competitors (Voice of Business)
– Design for Six Sigma
Model-Driven (e.g., CMMI)
• Determine the industry best practice – Benchmarking, models
• Compare your current practices to the model
– Appraisal, education
• Identify and prioritize improvement opportunities
– Implementation – Institutionalization
• Look for ways to optimize the processes
7
Agenda
• Current Challenges Facing the Aerospace Industry
• Current Industry Approaches – Capability Maturity Model Integrated – Lean Six Sigma
• Northrop Grumman Approach
8
What is the Capability Maturity Model Integrated?
• The CMMI is a collection of industry best-practices for engineering, services, acquisition, project management, support, and process management
– Developed under the sponsorship of DoD – Consistent with DoD and commercial standards
Three Constellations sharing common components and structure
• CMMI for Development - used by engineering organizations
• CMMI for Acquisition - used by buyers (e.g., govt. agencies)
• CMMI for Services - used by service providers (e.g., help desk)
9
Basic Building Blocks – 22 Process Areas
Project Management • Project Planning • Project
Monitoring and Control
• Supplier Agreement Management
• Integrated Project Management)
• Risk Management
• Quantitative Project Management
10
Engineering • Requirements
Development • Requirements
Management • Technical
Solution • Product
Integration • Verification • Validation
Support • Configuration
Management • Process and
Product Quality Assurance
• Measurement and Analysis
• Decision Analysis and Resolution
• Causal Analysis and Resolution
Process Management • Organizational
Process Focus • Organizational
Process Definition
• Organizational Training
• Organizational Process Performance
• Organizational Performance Management
Implemented by each project
Implemented by the organization
Expected Practices Provide Guidance for Implementation & Institutionalization
11
SG 1 Establish Estimates SP 1.1 Estimate the Scope of the Project SP 1.2 Establish Estimates of Work Product
and Task Attributes SP 1.3 Define Project Lifecycle Phases SP 1.4 Estimate Effort and Cost
SG 2 Develop a Project Plan SP 2.1 Establish the Budget and Schedule SP 2.2 Identify Project Risks SP 2.3 Plan Data Management SP 2.4 Plan the Project’s Resources SP 2.5 Plan Needed Knowledge and Skills SP 2.6 Plan Stakeholder Involvement SP 2.7 Establish the Project Plan
SG 3 Obtain Commitment to the Plan SP 3.1 Review Plans That Affect the Project SP 3.2 Reconcile Work and Resource Levels SP 3.3 Obtain Plan Commitment
GG 2 Institutionalize a Managed Process GP 2.1 Establish an Organizational Policy GP 2.2 Plan the Process GP 2.3 Provide Resources GP 2.4 Assign Responsibility GP 2.5 Train People GP 2.6 Manage Configurations GP 2.7 Identify and Involve Relevant
Stakeholders GP 2.8 Monitor and Control the Process GP 2.9 Objectively Evaluate Adherence GP 2.10 Review Status with Higher Level
Management GG 3 Institutionalize a Defined Process
GP 3.1 Establish a Defined Process GP 3.2 Collect Improvement Information
Project Planning – Implementation Project Planning - Institutionalization
Practice Ratings for the Organization/Projects
12
How is the CMMI Used for Process Improvement?
13 www.sei.cmu.edu/ideal/
IDEAL Model
Typical CMMI Benefits Cited in Literature
• Reduced costs – 33% decrease in the average
cost to fix a defect (Boeing) – 20% reduction in unit
software costs (Lockheed Martin)
• Faster Schedules – 50% reduction in release
turnaround time (Boeing) – 60% reduction in re-work
following test (Boeing)
• Greater Productivity – 25-30% increase in
productivity within 3 years (Lockheed Martin, Harris, Siemens)
• Higher Quality – 50% reduction of software
defects (Lockheed Martin)
• Customer Satisfaction – 55% increase in award fees
(Lockheed Martin) 14
Agenda
• Current Challenges Facing the Aerospace Industry
• Current Industry Approaches – Capability Maturity Model Integrated – Lean Six Sigma
• Northrop Grumman Approach
15
What is Lean Six Sigma (LSS)?
• Lean Six Sigma is a powerful approach to improving the work we do
• LSS improvement projects are performed by teams
• Teams use a set of tools and techniques to understand problems and find solutions
• Lean Six Sigma integrates tools and techniques from two proven process improvement methods
16
+
Six Sigma
• A management philosophy based on meeting business objectives by reducing variation
– A disciplined, data-driven methodology for decision making and process improvement
• To increase process performance, you have to decrease variation
17
Defects Defects
Too early Too late
Delivery Time
Reduce variation
Delivery Time
Too early Too late
Spread of variation too wide compared to
specifications
Spread of variation narrow compared to
specifications
• Greater predictability in the process
• Less waste and rework, which lowers costs
• Products and services that perform better and last longer
• Happier customers
DMAIC Roadmap
18
Define Control Analyze Improve Measure
Define project scope
Establish formal project
Identify needed data
Obtain data set
Evaluate data quality
Summarize& baseline data
Explore data
Characterize process & problem
Identify possible solutions
Implement (pilot as needed)
Define control method
Implement
Update improvement project scope & scale
Document
Select solution
Evaluate
[Hallowell-Siviy 05]
DMAIC Toolkit
19
Benchmark
Contract/Charter
Kano Model
Voice of the Customer
Voice of the Business
Quality Function Deployment
GQIM and Indicator Templates
Data Collection Methods
Measurement System Evaluation
Statistical Controls:
Control Charts
Time Series methods
Non-Statistical Controls:
Procedural adherence
Performance Mgmt
Preventive measures
Control Improve Measure Define Analyze Design of Experiments
Modeling
ANOVA
Tolerancing
Robust Design
Systems Thinking
Decision & Risk Analysis
PSM Perform Analysis Model
Cause & Effect Diagrams/ Matrix
Failure Modes & Effects Analysis
Statistical Inference
Reliability Analysis
Root Cause Analysis, including 5 Whys
Hypothesis Test
Design for Six Sigma (e.g., DMADV)
20
Define Verify Analyze Design Measure
Define project scope
Establish formal project
Identify customers
Research VOC
Benchmark
Quantify CTQs
Explore data
Design solution
Develop detailed design
Develop pilot
Evaluate pilot
Scale-up design
Predict performance
Document
Refine predicted performance
Lean
• Series of tools and techniques refined by Toyota and called the “Toyota Production System”
– Called “Lean” by Womack, Jones and Roos in The Machine That Changed the World
• Focused on increasing efficiency by eliminating non-value added process steps and wasteful practices
• Being adopted world-wide by both manufacturing and transactional based organizations
• Utilizes tools like “Value Stream Mapping,” “Just in Time” and “Kaizen”
21
LEAN FOCUS: ELIMINATE WASTE AND REDUCE CYCLE TIME
Wastes in Production
•
22
Types of
Waste
CORRECTION
WAITING
PROCESSING
MOTION
INVENTORY CONVEYANCE
OVERPRODUCTION
Repair or Rework Any wasted motion
to pick up parts or stack parts. Also wasted walking
Wasted effort to transport materials, parts, or finished goods into or out of storage, or between processes.
Producing more than is needed before it is needed
Maintaining excess inventory of raw mat’ls, parts in process, or finished goods.
Doing more work than is necessary
Any non-work time waiting for tools, supplies, parts, etc..
Organizational Adoption: Roles & Responsibilities
• Champions – Facilitate the leadership, implementation, and deployment
• Sponsors – Provide resources
• Process Owners – Responsible for the processes being improved
• Master Black Belts – Serve as mentors for Black Belts
• Black Belts – Lead major Six Sigma projects – Typically requires 4 weeks of training
• Green Belts – Lead minor Six Sigma teams, or serve on improvement teams under a Black Belt
– Typically requires 2 weeks of training
23
A Typical Lean Six Sigma Project in Aerospace
The organization notes that systems integration has been problematic on past projects (budget/schedule overruns)
A Six Sigma team is formed to scope the problem, collect data from past projects, and determine the root cause(s)
The team’s analysis of the historical data indicates that ineffective peer reviews are leaving significant errors to be found in test
Procedures and criteria for better peer reviews are written, using best practices from past projects
A pilot project uses the new peer review procedures and criteria, and collects data to verify they solve the problem
The organization’s standard process and training is modified to incorporate the procedures and criteria, to prevent similar problems on future projects
24
Agenda
• Current Challenges Facing the Aerospace Industry
• Current Industry Approaches – Capability Maturity Model Integrated – Lean Six Sigma
• Northrop Grumman Approach
25
Northrop Grumman Approach: Mission Success Requires Multiple Approaches
26
Process Effectiveness
Program Effectiveness
Mission Assurance & Enterprise Excellence
Operations Effectiveness
Dashboards for Enterprise-Wide
Measurement
Communications & Best-Practice Sharing
Robust Governance Model (Policies, Processes,
Procedures)
Risk Management
Systems Engineering
Independent Reviews & Cost Estimates
Training, Tools, & Templates
CMMI Level 5 for Software, Systems, and
Services
ISO 9001 and AS-9100 Certification
Six Sigma
Organizational Infrastructure Required for CMMI Level 3
27
Policies, Processes, Templates & Tools
Best-Practice Libraries
Process Group
Audits & Appraisals Measurement Repositories Predictive Modeling
Developing and maintaining mature processes requires significant time and investment in infrastructure
Process Improvement Training Program
Communications
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71
UCL
_X
Def
ects
per
com
pone
nt
Component #
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71
UCL
_X
Def
ects
per
com
pone
nt
Component #
Northrop Grumman Approach: Institutionalizing Our Improvements
28
Internal Best Practices
ISO/AS9100 Findings
CMMI Appraisal Findings
Policy
Procedures
Process
eToolkit PAL
Workbench StartIt! My MS Portal
Tools
Information
Checklists and Guides
Templates and Examples
Disposition
Independent Audits
• Systems/ Software Engineering Process Group
• QMS Working Group
• Program Management Advisory Board Lessons Learned
& Metrics
Analysis
Customer Comments
Configuration Control Board
External Best Practices
Industry Standards
Six Sigma Projects
We systematically analyze quality and process data and trends to determine
how to improve our processes
We improve our process assets based on internal and external best
practices
Deployed to
programs
Increasing program efficiency
msCAS
PCDB
Northrop Grumman Approach: Lessons Learned
• Multiple improvement initiatives helps encourage a change in behavior as opposed to “achieving a level”
– Reinforces that change (improvement) is a way of life
• Benefits results from institutionalizing local improvements across the wider organization
– CMMI establishes the needed mechanisms
• CMMI and Lean Six Sigma compliment each other – CMMI can yield behaviors without benefits – Lean Six Sigma improvements based solely on data may miss innovative
improvements (assumes a local optimum)
• Training over half the staff as Lean Six Sigma Green Belts has resulted in a change of language and culture
– Voice of Customer, data-driven decisions, causal analysis, etc. – Better to understand/use tools in everyday work than to adopt the “religion”
29