Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Slide 1 Dr. John R. Barr, Motorola

March 2003Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Submission Title: [WG-TG3 Closing Report March03]

Date Submitted: [14March03]

Source: [John Barr] Company [Motorola]Address [1303 E. Golf Road, Schuamburg, IL 60196]Voice:[+1 847 576-8706], FAX: [+1 847 576-6758], E-Mail:[[email protected]]

Re: [02424r0P802-15_TG3-November02-Meeting-Objective-and-Agenda.xls]

Abstract: [TG3 Chair Report to 802.15 WG]

Purpose: [TG3 chair report to WG to update them on work completed at DFW.]

Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by 802.15.

March 2003

Dr. John R. Barr, MotorolaSlide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks

TG3 Closing ReportMarch 2003, DFW

Texas

802.15

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Agenda

• Goals of March Meeting

• Sponsor Ballot Status

• Motion to add 802.15.3 to REVCOM agenda

• Motion to empower BRC

• Goals for May Meeting

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Goals for March

Conference call status, including approval of any ad hoc business.

Sponsor ballot comment resolution.

• Update draft as required.

? Approve sponsor ballot recirculation.

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

SB1 Comment Status

E T W ABailey N-Y 16 16 32 16 16 0Bain N-Y 16 26 42 26 26 0Barr N-Y 0 4 4 4 4 0Gifford N-Y 13 13 26 13 13 0Gilb N-Y 1 31 32 31 31 0Gubbi N 0 5 5 5 0 5 150-154Heberling N-Y 26 26 52 26 26 0Ho N 274 166 440 166 166 0 Offline YES VoteKowalski N-Y 4 6 10 6 6 0Lynch N-Y 0 9 9 9 9 0Miller N-Y 0 9 9 9 9 0Odman N-Y 1 18 19 18 18 0Roberts N-Y 0 8 8 8 8 0Rudnick N-Y 8 19 27 19 19 0Shvodian N-Y 1 17 18 17 17 0Struik N 4 42 46 42 10 32 Did not respondWelborn N-Y 0 9 9 9 9 0Yes Voters Y 15 23 38 23 23 0

379 447 826 447 410 37

SB1 Voter NotesTotalComments Resolved

Vote Open

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

SB2 Comment Status

E T W A SB1 SB2Bailey Y1 9 9 18 9 9 0 0Barr Y1 8 25 33 25 25 0 0Gifford Y1 2 1 3 1 1 0 0Gilb Y1 3 6 9 6 6 0 0Gubbi (N) 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 150-154Ho Y1 72 12 84 12 12 0 0 Offline YES VoteOdman Y1 9 10 19 10 10 0 0Shvodian Y1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0Struik N 0 3 3 3 0 32 3 Did not respondShipp Y1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

104 67 171 67 64 37 3

SB1 Voter NotesTotalComments Resolved

VoteOPEN

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Motion to the TG3

Move to empower the 802.15.3 SBRC to update D16 to D17 and release for sponsor ballot recirculation under LMSC Procedure 10.

Mover: Al Heberling Second: Jim Allen

For – 5

Against – 0

Abstain – 0

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Motion to the WG

Move to empower the 802.15.3 SBRC to update D16 to D17 and release for sponsor ballot recirculation under LMSC Procedure 10. (TG 5/0/0)

Mover: John Barr Second: Jim Allen

For –

Against –

Abstain –

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Conditional Approval Support• D16 Recirculation Ballot

– Closed – 8March2003 (15-day)– 74 Approve/2 Disapprove/6 Abstain (97%)– Disapprove Comments (package)– Confirmation Schedule

• Pre-D17 on 24March2003– Inform IEEE-SA of ballot in two weeks

• SBRC comments on 31March2003• D17 Released for SB on 5April2003

– Copy to IEEE-SA and REVCOM

• D17 SB Starts on 7April2003(15-day)• D17 SB Closes on 22April2003• SBRC Meeting in Chicago on 24April2003

– Submit to REVCOM for 5May2003 Meeting

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

802.15.3 SB No Vote Resolution• D15 Remaining Disapprove Votes:

– Raju Gubbi – 5 Comments (1 Rebuttal)– Rene Struik – 32 Comments (No Response)– All disapprove comments were provided to the

sponsor ballot pool along with D16. No additional NO votes were received supporting these comments. D16 had 97% approval.

• D16 Remaining Disapprove Votes:– Rene Struik – 3 Comments (No Response)

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Rajugopal Gubbi submitted the following comment during the 802.15.3/D15 sponsor ballot: CID 153: Clause: 00Subclause: 00Page: 00Line: 00Comment Type: TR COMMENT START:Summarise all PHY timing parameters in one table in 11.2.7 ref: CID 69 - LB22 A summary all PHY dependent parameters (aCCADetectTime,aPHYSIFS-Time etc.) in a table with actual values at one place instead of spreading them all around the PHY clause is very desirable from implementors'view. An example would be Table-64 for MAC parameters. Although Table-120 provides a list of just the IFS parameters in a table, even there the for actual values the readers have to scrouge through the individual subclauses, which can easily be avoided.COMMENT END:SUGGESTED REMEDY:Make the change as requested.SUGGESTED REMEDY END:RESPONSE:ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE. Make a table of all of the pZZZYyy parameters and their values, this will follow the format of table 65 in clause 8.RESPONSE END:

CID 153 Rebuttal

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Rajugopal Gubbi’s Email Response (18Feb2003):

TR-153 - Why is this ACCEPT in PRINCIPAL? Why not simplify the process by saying ACCEPT? If there is any deviation to listing parameters in one, single comprehensive table, the resolution will be unacceptable to me.

802.15.3 Technical Editor’s Reply (19Feb2003):

In the suggested resolution, you did not exactly specify what was to be done, so it was an accept in principle. To do an Accept, we need exact text or changes to be made. I put the following parameters in one table: pPHYMIFSTime, pPHYSIFSTime, pCCADetectTime, pPHYChannelSwitchTime with the associated timing information.

It makes it more difficult to read the PHY clause in the draft to have them in a single table rather than the location where the measurement is defined, but it wasn't a big deal to move them either.

In any event, the comment is really editorial, we have not changed any of the technical requirements in the standard, just the location of the information. All of the timing information is defined in exactly the same way as it was before.

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

D16 added Table 80: PHY layer timing parameters.

802.15.3 Chair’s Request to D16 sponsor ballot negative voters (8March2003):

Please submit a recirculation ballot with your vote on D16. This will help us get a clean record for all of the previous NO voters.

Rajugopal Gubbi’s Response (9March2003):

Please refer to the following section of the SB announcement.

"NOTE: You must respond to a Recirculation Ballot if you wish to change your initial vote. If you do not respond to a Recirculation Ballot, your last vote will be carried forward."

Hence what you are asking is completely unnecessary, since the NO votes will be carried through.

802.13.3 Chair’s Request for Reconsideration (12March2003):

Please review D16 and your comments one more time and let me know whether the new draft satisfies any of your outstanding unsatisfied comment resolutions from the first sponsor ballot.

End of Resolution Record for CID 153.

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Motion to the Task Group

Move to seek approval of the WG to place IEEE 802.15.3 D17 on the May REVCOM agenda subject to successful completion of recirculation ballot following LMSC Procedure 10.

Mover: Jim Allen Second: Al Heberling

For – 5

Against – 0

Abstain – 0

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Motion to the Working GroupMove to place IEEE 802.15.3 D17 on the May

REVCOM agenda subject to successful completion of recirculation ballot following LMSC Procedure 10.

TG3 Approval: 5/0/0

Mover: Jim Allen Second: John Barr

For –

Against –

Abstain –

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Goals for May

• Conference call status, including approval of any ad hoc business.

• Review and address any REVCOM issues.

• Editing recommendations for IEEE-SA .

• Prepare for final approval

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

SBRC Ad Hoc Meeting

• April 24, 2003 – Schaumburg, IL– Hosted by Motorola– Noon to 5PM– Address D17 Sponsor Ballot Comments

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Publicity Committee Input• IEEE 802.15.3 sponsor ballot has >97% approval.

Task group has reviewed all of the technical comments and is preparing an updated draft (D17) for recirculation in April.

• IEEE-SA will have pre-standard copies of IEEE 802.15.3 available for distribution in April.

• IEEE 802.15.3 draft standard is expected to be submitted for final approval following successful recirculation in May.

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

802.15.3 Application Space

March 2003


doc.: IEEE 802.15-03/078r0

Submission

Ultra Wide Bench (UWB)

Documents

Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)