73
TH PR ELEC HE NM REP PROJ EXECUT PROJEC ROJECT DI CTION M SECR PORTI JECT TIVE SPON CT SPONSO IRECTOR PROJEC ORIGINA N SYST PR SO RETAR ING & T MAN (P NSOR –BRA OR KARI F KARI FRE T MANAGE AL PLAN DA REVISION REV TEM M ROJEC OS IRI RY OF S INTEG NAGE PMP) AD WINTER FRESQUEZ ESQUEZ, CH ER LORI ATE: SEPT N DATE: 2/1 VISION: 2.1 MODER CT IS STATE GRITY EMEN ) R, SECRET Z, ELECTIO HIEF INFO I HEWIG, C EMBER 24 1/2016 1 RNIZAT E INTEG SYSTE NT PL TARY OF ST ONS DIREC ORMATION CSW , 2013 TION GRATE EM LAN TATE CTOR OFFICER ED

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PL AN (PMP) - … IRIS/SOS IRIS_Project...Feb 24, 2016 · ect managem evelop and m nagement a ly a project roject manag related to s or testing ac e source and

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

TH

PR

ELEC

HE NMREP

PROJ

EXECUT

PROJEC

ROJECT DI

CTION

M SECR

PORTI

JECT

TIVE SPON

CT SPONSO

IRECTOR –

PROJEC

ORIGINA

N SYST

PR

SO

RETAR

ING &

T MAN(P

NSOR –BRA

OR – KARI F

– KARI FRE

T MANAGE

AL PLAN DA

REVISION

REV

TEM MROJEC

OS IRI

RY OF SINTEG

NAGEPMP)

AD WINTER

FRESQUEZ

ESQUEZ, CH

ER – LORI

ATE: SEPT

N DATE: 2/1

VISION: 2.1

MODER

CT

IS

STATE

GRITY

EMEN)

R, SECRET

Z, ELECTIO

HIEF INFO

I HEWIG, C

EMBER 24

1/2016

1

RNIZAT

E INTEG

SYSTE

NT PL

TARY OF ST

ONS DIREC

ORMATION

CSW

, 2013

TION

GRATE

EM

LAN

TATE

CTOR

OFFICER

ED

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

REVISION 

PREPARIN

ABOUT TH

PROJECT 

1.0 PROJEC

1.1  EX1.2 FUND1.3  CO1.4  D1.5  AS1.6 PRO

2.0 PROJEC

2.1 STAK2.2 PROJ

2.2.1

2.2.3

2.3 EXE

3.0 SCOPE 

3.1 PROJ3.1.13.1.2

3.2 PROJ3.3 CRIT

4.0 PROJEC

4.1 PROJ4.1.14.1.24.1.3

4.2 PRO4.2.14.2.24.2.34.2.4

5.0 PROJEC

5.1 WOR

5.2 SCHE5.4 PROJ

5.4.15.4.2

5.5 STA5.5.1

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N: 2.0

HISTORY ........

G THE PROJEC

HIS DOCUMENT

OVERSIGHT PROC

CT OVERVIEW 

XECUTIVE SUMMA

DING AND SOURCE

ONSTRAINTS ......EPENDENCIES SSUMPTIONS .OJECT RISKS IDEN

CT AUTHORITY

KEHOLDERS ........JECT GOVERNANC1 Describe the o

3 ORGANIZATION

CUTIVE REPOR

.....................

JECT OBJECTIVES 1 Business Obje2 Technical ObjJECT EXCLUSIONS ICAL SUCCESS FAC

CT DELIVERAB

JECT MANAGEME

1 Project Mana2 Deliverable A3 Deliverable AODUCT LIFE CYC1 Technical Stra2 Product and P3 Deliverable A4 Deliverable A

CT WORK .......

RK BREAKDOWN SEDULE ALLOCATIO

JECT TEAM ........1 Project Team2 Project TeamFF PLANNING A1 Project Staff .

GRATERIS)

MANAG

......................

CT MANAGEME

T ....................

CESS MEMORAND

.....................

ARY‐ RATIONALE FES .........................................................................................NTIFIED ..............

Y AND ORGAN

.......................CE STRUCTURE ....organizational

NAL BOUNDARIES,

 .............RTING

......................

.......................ectives ............jectives ..................................CTORS ..............

LES AND METH

ENT LIFE CYCLE ...agement Delivepproval Authocceptance ProCLE ..................ategy ..............Product Developproval Authocceptance Pro

......................

STRUCTURE (WBSON ‐PROJECT TIME

....................... Organizationa Roles and ResAND RESOURCE A.......................

D REP

GEMEN

.....................

ENT PLAN ......

.....................

DUM – DOIT, JUL

.....................

FOR THE PROJECT...................................................................................................................

IZATIONAL ST

.......................

.......................l structure – Or

, INTERFACES AND

.......................

.....................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

HODOLOGY ...

.......................erables ............ority Designatiocedure ..........................................................opment Deliverority Designatiocedure ............

.....................

S) ....................ELINE .......................................al Structure .....sponsibilities ...ACQUISITION .........................

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

.....................

.....................

.....................

LY 2007 ...........

.....................

.........................................................................................................................................

RUCTURE ......

.......................

.......................rg Chart ..........

D RESPONSIBILITIE

.......................

.....................

.......................

........................

........................

.......................

.......................

.....................

.......................

........................ons .........................................................................................rables ..............ons ..........................................

.....................

.......................

.......................

.......................

........................

........................

.......................

........................

NG AND

AN (PM

.....................

.....................

.....................

.......................

.....................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.....................

.......................

.......................

.......................

 ....................ES

.......................

.....................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.....................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.....................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

D INTE

MP)

......................

......................

......................

........................

......................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

........................

......................

........................

...............................................

.......................

........................

......................

......................................................................................................................

......................

.................................................................................................................................................................................................................

......................

........................

........................

.....................................................................................................................

EGRITY

i

......................

......................

......................

.......................

......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

Y

i OF vi

...... III 

...... IV 

...... IV 

....... IV 

....... 1 

........ 1 

........ 2 

........ 3 

........ 4 

........ 5 

........ 5 

...... 10 

...... 10 

...... 12 

...... 12 

...... 14 

...... 14 

...... 15 

...... 15 

...... 15 

...... 15 

...... 16 

...... 16 

...... 17 

...... 17 

...... 18 

...... 27 

...... 29 

...... 30 

...... 31 

...... 32 

...... 36 

...... 37 

...... 37 

...... 37 

...... 38 

...... 42 

...... 43 

...... 44 

...... 47 

...... 47 

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

5.5.25.6 PRO

5.6.1

6.0 PROJEC

6.1 RISK 6.1.16.1.2

6.2 IND6.3 SCOP

6.3.16.4 PROJ

6.4.16.5 COM

6.5.16.5.26.5.3

6.6 PER6.7 QUA

6.7.16.7.26.7.36.7.4

6.8 CON6.8.16.8.2

6.9 PRO

7. 0 PROJE

7.1 A7.2 C

ATTACHM

APPENDIX

AcroDefin

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N: 2.0

2 Non‐PersonneOJECT LOGISTIC1 Project Team

CT MANAGEM

AND ISSUE MANA

1 Risk Managem2 ISSUE MANAGEPENDENT VERPE MANAGEMENT

1 Change ContrJECT BUDGET MA

1 Budget TrackMMUNICATION PLA1 Communicati2 Status Meetin3 Project StatusFORMANCE MALITY OBJECTIV1 quality Stand2 Project and P3 Agency/Custo4 PRODUCT DENFIGURATION M1 Version Contr2 Project Repos

OCUREMENT M

ECT CLOSE .......

Administrative Contract Close 

ENTS .............

X A — DEFINITI

nyms and Abbnitions ............

GRATERIS)

MANAG

el resources ....CS .................... Training ........

MENT AND CON

AGEMENT ..........ment Strategy GEMENT .........RIFICATION AND VT PLAN .............rol ...................ANAGEMENT .......king .................AN ...................ion Matrix ......ngs .................s Reports ........EASUREMENT VES AND CONTdards ...............Product Reviewomer SatisfactiELIVERABLE ACCMANAGEMENTrol ...................sitory (Project L

MANAGEMENT

......................

Close .....................................

......................

 ..............ONS

reviations .............................

D REP

GEMEN

.......................

.......................

.......................

NTROLS ..........

.......................

.......................

.......................VALIDATION ‐ IV&........................................................................................................................................................................................(PROJECT & Q

TROL .......................................

w AND ASSESSMion ..................CEPTANCE PROT ............................................Library) ...........

 ............T PLAN

.....................

.......................

.......................

.....................

.....................

.......................

.......................

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

........................

.......................

........................

.....................

.......................

........................

........................&V ................................................................................................................................................................................................................

QUALITY METRICS...............................................MENTS .....................................OCESS .....................................................................................

.......................

.....................

........................

........................

.....................

.....................

........................

........................

NG AND

AN (PM

.......................

.......................

.......................

.....................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................S) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................

.......................

.....................

.......................

.......................

.....................

.....................

.......................

.......................

D INTE

MP)

......................................................................

......................

...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

........................

......................

.......................

.......................

......................

......................

.......................

.......................

EGRITY

ii

.......................

.......................

.......................

......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

.......................

......................

.......................

.......................

......................

......................

.......................

.......................

Y

i OF vi

...... 47 

...... 48 

...... 48 

...... 49 

...... 49 

...... 49 

...... 49 

...... 49 

...... 51 

...... 51 

...... 52 

...... 52 

...... 54 

...... 54 

...... 55 

...... 55 

...... 55 

...... 56 

...... 56 

...... 57 

...... 57 

...... 57 

...... 58 

...... 58 

...... 58 

...... 59 

...... 60 

...... 60 

...... 60 

...... 61 

...... 62 

...... 62 

...... 62 

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

REVIS

RN

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

2.

2.

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N: 2.0

SION HI

REVISION

NUMBER

.0

.1

.2

.3

.4

.4.3

.5

.0

.1

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ISTORY

DATE

9/24/2013

10/7/2013

10/9/2013

2/4/1420

3/7/2014

4/15/2014

5/12/2015

12/09/2015

02/01/2016

D REP

GEMEN

C

I

A

Fs

P

E

S

P

P

P

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

COMMENT

nitial PMP b

Add WBS as

Final review sponsor

Project Kick-

End of Phase

Status update

Phase 3 Plan

Phase 3 Impl

Phase 3 Impl

NG AND

AN (PM

by SOS CIO

s Attachmen

by executiv

-Off

e 1

es

nning

lementation

lementation

D INTE

MP)

APPRO

DATE

O Kari F

nt B Kari F

ve Kari F

Kari F

Kari F

Kari F

Kari F

Kari F

Kari F

EGRITY

iii

OVED BY /

resquez

resquez

resquez

resquez

resquez

resquez

resquez

resquez

resquez

Y

i OF vi

P

A

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

PREPAR

The workmanager projects.

ABOUT T

Project O

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N: 2.0

RING TH

kbook for prand the projPlease refer

THIS DO

Oversight P

“Project mDepartmenproject clo

The primafacilitate cschedule b

A projectcommunic

“Project mof the projclose). Theffectivelyresponsiblensure timaffected byensures ad

Project proagreed and

“Product dof iterativedeploymen

GRATERIS)

MANAG

HE PROJ

reparation ofject team to r to it while d

OCUMEN

Process M

management pnt and develoose.

ary uses of thcommunicatio

baselines.

t plan inclucations, delive

manager” meaject over the e project man

y coordinate e for develop

mely complety the project

dherence to th

oduct” meansd approved ac

development le disciplines nt implemente

D REP

GEMEN

JECT MA

f the Project use the Projdeveloping t

NT

emorandu

plan” is a formoped in the pl

he project plaon among st

udes at leaserable review

ans a qualifiedentire projec

nager must bthe activitie

ping the projtion of the p

including ene best practic

the final projcceptance crit

life cycle” is such as requ

ed to build a p

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ANAGEM

Managemenect Managemthis PMP for

um – DoIT

mal documentlan phase use

an are to doctakeholders,

t other planand acceptan

d person fromct managemebe familiar wes of the teject plan andproject. The nd users, distces and standa

ject deliveraberia.

a series of seuirements, anproduct or de

NG AND

AN (PM

MENT P

nt Plan is bument Plan inr your projec

T, July 200

nt approved byed to manage

cument planniand docume

ns for issuence, staff acqu

m the lead agent lifecycle (

with project sceam. In addd project sche

project mantributors, andards of the De

bles as define

equential, nonnalysis and deevelop a servi

D INTE

MP)

PLAN

uilt around hen support of ct.

07

y the executivproject exec

ing assumptients approved

e escalation,uisition, and r

ency respons(initiate, plancope and obj

dition, the predule with th

nager interfacd vendors. Thepartment.

d in the proje

n-overlappingesign, implemce.

EGRITY

iv

elping the prsuccessful

ve sponsor ancution, contro

ons and decid scope, cos

, change corisk managem

sible for all asn, execute, coectives, as wroject managhe project teaces with all he project ma

ect plan meeti

g phases compmentation, tes

Y

v OF vi

roject

nd the ol, and

isions, st and

ontrol, ment.

spects ontrol,

well as ger is am to areas

anager

ing all

prised st and

1

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

1.0 PROJThe Projec

1.1 EXEC

Currentlydisjointedelection cfull electvoter regcounty re

After theauditors iobservati

L

L

H

S

Vsoor

Inin

Sw

Lco

Based onmodern, manual pSOS envpreparaticounties

The Secrsystem fr

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

JECT OVct Overview set

CUTIVE S

y, the Secretd software acycle. The Sion cycle fro

gistration, miesult canvass

e 2012 generidentified soions include

Large numbe

Large numbe

High election

ignificant re

Vendor manaoftware relear impossible

nadequate elnadequate ba

ystems do nwithout manu

Limitations eounties that

n these obsercentralized e

processes, anisions a systion, ballot onand the state

retary of Statrom the State

GRATERIS)

MANAG

VERVIEWts the stage for

SUMMAR

ary of State and hardwareSOS has idenom candidateilitary and ovsing and cert

ral election, tome concern:

r of disparat

r of manual

n costs and b

eliance on ve

aged, COTS ase dates ande,

lection nightandwidth to

not adequatelual workarou

xist in currehave adopte

rvations, the election mannd better intetem that allon demand dae.

te has obtaine of South D

D REP

GEMEN

W r the details of

RY- RATIO

(SOS) and te systems anntified 17 syse filing, ballverseas ballotification.

the SOS elecns that must b

te systems,

processes,

udget shortf

endor suppor

systems havd expensive

t reporting someet deman

ly or efficienunds and ine

nt tabulationed voting con

goal of the nagement syegrate the cows for seam

ata, election r

ned ownershDakota, at no

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

the project and

ONALE F

the 33 Countnd many manstems and/orot creation aot delivery, a

ction staff, thbe addressed

falls,

rt with low c

ve “one size enhancemen

olution that ind of election

ntly meet buefficient work

n and resultsnvenience ce

Secretary ofstem that wi

omponents ofmless transitio

results repor

ip of a proveo cost to the

NG AND

AN (PM

d begins the “st

FOR THE

ty Clerk Offnual processr manual proand certificatand election

he county cld for the nex

customer sat

fits all” busint costs mak

involves man night site v

siness and/ork processes,

s reporting soenters.

f State’s Offiill eliminate f conductingon between crting, and ele

en voter elecState of New

D INTE

MP)

tory” of the pr

PROJEC

fices use a mes during a socesses utiliztion, tabulat night report

lerks, and thext election cy

tisfaction,

iness model king system c

anual file provisits,

or statutory r, and

oftware to pr

fice is to impduplicate da

g a statewidecandidate daectronic can

ction managew Mexico, v

EGRITY

PA

oject and plan.

CT

multitude of statewide zed to compltor programmting to state

e statewide ycle. Some o

with inflexichanges diff

ocessing and

requirements

roperly canv

plement a ata entry, rede election. Thata, ballot nvassing for

ement softwvalued at

Y

AGE | 1

.

lete a ming, and

of the

ible ficult

d

s

vass

duce he

ware

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

approximto implemMexico -IRIS willsystems apublic beinformati

[Update –During PIRIS to inproject wmanagemclerks forfurther incosts. [Update –In June, 2business in house compone

These effsystem ancommencby June 3

[Update – The projescheduleat the req2016 relato the Seto the Imtesting of

1.2 FUND

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

mately $1,00ment a custo- the New Ml be a moderand will alloetter access tion as well a

– May 2015Phase 1 and Pnclude Cand

will continue ment system r voter regisncrease unifo

– November2015, the SOand functionstaff to cust

ents of SOS I

forts positionnd will lead ce Phase 3. 30, 2017.

– January, 2

ect’s gap anad to commen

quest of the Dated to hostincretary to su

mplementatiof the IRIS El

DING AND

GRATERIS)

MANAG

0,000. The Somized and in

Mexico SOS Irn, integratedow for uniforto voting infoas quick diss

] Phase 2 of thdidate Filing

developmenthat will inte

stration and ormity of ele

r 2015] OS completenal requiremomize and dIRIS. (Phase

ned the agento a more thPhase 3 of t

016]

alysis and dence in FebruDoIT Secretng election m

upplement mn phase. Thlection Nigh

D SOURC

D REP

GEMEN

SOS has beentegrated eleIntegrated Rd system tharm data colleformation sucsemination o

he project, th, Results Rent of SOS IRegrate all proelection ma

ection data a

ed a 6 monthments documdeliver the voe 3)

ncy to better horoughly dethe project b

evelopment uary, 2016 anary Ackley, management

materials alrehe team has aht Reporting

CES

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

en granted peection manag

Reporting andat will reduceection and stch as sample

of election ni

he SOS implporting, and

RIS; thereby,ocesses and nagement. F

and processe

hs’ requiremeents to be usoter registra

baseline reqeveloped sofegan in Aug

environmentnd continue conducted r

t systems in ady providealso hired a tmodule. Tes

NG AND

AN (PM

ermission to gement systd Integrity Se the 17 currtatewide repe ballots andight results.

lemented cerd Electronic C, implementisystems util

Full implemes and signifi

ents assessmsed by the IR

ation and ele

quirements aftware develgust 2015 an

nt configuratithrough Jun

research andthe cloud and to the PCCtesting contrsting is to be

D INTE

MP)

modify the em for the S

System (SOSrent disparat

porting as wed polling loca

rtain componCanvass. Phing a modernlized by the entation of ticantly reduc

ment in orderRIS developmection manag

and expectatiopment contd is schedule

ion and set une, 2016. Thd interviews dnd provided C regarding fractor to proe completed

EGRITY

PA

software in State of NewS IRIS). SOSte and/or manell as allow tation

nents of the hase 3 of the n election SOS and cou

this system wce operating

r to gather ment vendorgement

ions of the ntract to ed to comple

up activities he project teaduring Januatwo (2) repofunding to m

ovide end to by March, 2

Y

AGE | 2

order w S nual the

SOS

unty will

r and

new

ete

are am, ary, orts move end 2016.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

SOURC

LAWS CHAPTSECTIO

LAWS SENATGENERSECRESTATEELECTPROGR

Laws 20101, Sec(pg 193of State

CERTIFI

Da

10/23/201

Initiation/

12/17/201Change

05/27/201Change

2/1/2016

Implemen

(this reque

Total

1.3 CON

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

CE

OF 2013, TER 227, ON 4

2014, TE BILL 313RAL FUND,ETARY OF E,

IONS RAM

015, Chapterction 7(12), ), Secretary

ICATION HIST

ate

13

/Planning

14

15

ntation

est)

STRAINT

GRATERIS)

MANAG

AMOUN

$3

3,

$1

r $1,

TORY (INCLUDE A

Amount

$311

$190

$500

$900

$1,901

TS

D REP

GEMEN

NT

311,000

190,000

,400,000

ANY PREVIOUS PRO

Fun

,000 Laws o

,000 Laws 2

,000 Laws 2

,000 Laws 2

,000

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ASSOCRESTR

NONE

NONE

REQUIRRELEAFUNDS

OJECT OR PHASE CE

nding Source(s

of 2013, Chapt

2014, Chapter

2015, Chapter

2015, Chapter

NG AND

AN (PM

CIATED RICTIONS

RES ASE OF S BY PCC

ERTIFICATIONS)

s) (use specific

ter 227, Sectio

63, Section 4

101, Section

101, Section

D INTE

MP)

APPRO

DOIT;

DOIT;

DOIT;

citations to law

on 4, Election

, Elections Pro

7(12)

7(12)

EGRITY

PA

OVERS

SPD

SPD; PCC

SPD; PCC

ws, grants, etc.

s Program

ogram

Y

AGE | 3

.)

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Constrain

NUMBE

1

2

3

1.4 DEPE

Types inc M D

enin

Epr

NUMBE

1

2

3

4

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

nts are factor

ER D

InasJuanel

Bre

Bch

ENDENCI

clude the folM- Mandatory dD- Discretionaryncompass partin the project lif- External deproject activities

ER DESCR

Sole soprotests

Contracand wit

The prowithin forward

New le

GRATERIS)

MANAG

rs that restri

DESCRIPTI

nternal staff ssignments. une, 2016 annd election slection supp

Budget projecequirements

Budget, scopehanges the o

IES

llowing and dependencies ay dependenciesicular approachfe cycle. endencies are ds such as purch

RIPTION

ource for BPrs

ct approval athin budget i

oject’s infrasthe first quad with softw

eadership at t

D REP

GEMEN

ct the projec

ION

resources ar Phase 3 dev

nd Septembestaff resourcort.

ctions have bdefined.

e, and time oothers.

should be asare dependencis are dependenhes because a s

dependencies thasing/procurem

ro contracts

and project cidentified in

structure plarter of 2016

ware developm

the SOS con

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ct by scope, r

re available ovelopment aer – Novembces being 100

been estimat

of project ar

ssociated wiies that are inhencies defined byspecific sequen

that involve a rment

will be appr

certification project plan

atform is appso that the pment activiti

ntinues to sup

NG AND

AN (PM

resource, or

only on a paactivities wilber, 2016 (6 0% dedicate

ted without h

e inter-relate

ith each depeerent to the woy the project m

nce of activities

relationship be

roved withou

will occur an.

proved by theproject may ies.

pport the pro

D INTE

MP)

schedule.

art time basisl be restrictemonths) dued to Primary

having full p

ed - a chang

endency listeork being donemanagement teas is preferred, b

etween project

ut

at times

e DoIT move

oject.

EGRITY

PA

s due to otheed from Aprie to technicay and Genera

project

e in one

ed. e. am. This may abut not mandat

activities and n

TYPE M,D

E

E

E

M

Y

AGE | 4

er il – al al

also tory

non-

D,E

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

1.5ASSUM

Assumptio

NUMBE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1.6 PROJIn this setaken to m

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

MPTIONS

ons are plannin

ER D

Epac

Tsp

Tto

Tfo

Cp

Tp

Tel

VIR

JECT RISKection identifmaximize ac

GRATERIS)

MANAG

S

g factors that,

DESCRIPTI

Executive sporovide adequccomplish d

The South Dapecific requi

The project oo perform wo

The project collowed by t

Changes to scroject’s form

Tabulator venrogramming

Tabulator venlection night

VREMS vendRIS system.

KS IDENTfy and descrictivity that w

D REP

GEMEN

for planning pu

ION

onsors and leuate staffing

deliverables b

akota Total Virements for

organization ork and reso

harter and suthe project te

cope, schedumal change c

ndors will acg tabulators a

ndors will prt reporting.

dor will prov

TIFIED ibe how each

will result in

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

urposes, will b

eadership stag resources inby the projec

Vote framewNew Mexic

structure deolve issues in

ubsequent pream and upd

ule, and budgcontrol proce

ccept SOS geand ballots.

rovide result

vide a tool fo

h risk will bminimizing

NG AND

AN (PM

be considered tr

akeholders sn the IT andct schedule.

work can be co election c

scribed will n a timely m

roject managdated as need

get will be hesses.

enerated ele

ts files in pre

or accessing

e managed.probability

D INTE

MP)

rue, real, or cer

support the pd business un

customized ode and requ

be put in plamanner.

gement planded.

handled throu

ction definit

e-determined

g data for mig

Include the and impact

EGRITY

PA

rtain.

project and wnits to

to meet the uirements.

ace and used

n will be

ugh the

tion file for

d format for

gration to ne

steps that wof each risk.

Y

AGE | 5

will

d

ew

ill be .

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Risk 1

Descrip

SOS prgovernmmethodahead ocloud ststate go

Risk 2

Descrip

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

tion -

referred ment cloud

dology is curof an enterptrategy for tovernment

tion -

GRATERIS)

MANAG

hosting rrently

prise the NM

Pr

MthAdopr20nahobeupfomtocofinprD

CafaprescchC

Pr

D REP

GEMEN

robability: M

Mitigation Strhat is thorou

Azure as the ocuments inresented to 016, provideationwide sosting electieing placed opdates and reorward using

managing theo include IV&onsultant comnal transitionrocess, we w

DoIT.

Contingency Pffected by application decommendachedule, scohange. Pres

Committee fo

robability: Low

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

Medium

rategy: Provugh and conplatform fo

n accordanccommittee ed DoIT witurvey (deveion manageon PCC Febequest fundi

g the expertis project with&V. In additmpany verifn to live ope

will maintain

Plan: Identa change in pdeployment ations. Revisope, budget ent revised or approval

w

NG AND

AN (PM

Impmisin sbud

vided formancise in its aor IRIS. Coce with DoITin Novembeth white paeloped by thement systembruary 2016 ming for implese of the sofh a top-flightion, we will

fy the securiteration. Thron an open com

tify all aspecplatform anplan based se TARC doand resourcplan to Exel.

ImpaMIS

D INTE

MP)

pact : High –ssed deadlinscope and/ordget

al business argument foompleted allT standardser 2015. Inper and rep

he NM SOS)ms in the clomeeting to pementation aftware vendoht project mal have an expty of the IRIoughout the mmunication

cts of projecnd develop n

on DoIT ocuments, pces to accomecutive Stee

act : HIGH – C

SSED DEADLIN

EGRITY

PA

– could causnes, reductior increase in

case to DoIor selecting l TARC s and February,

port of a ) regardingoud. Requespresent projeactivities. Mor, while tighanagement tepert security

IS prior to thentirety of thns posture w

ct that are new

project mmodate ering

COULD CAUS

NES

Y

AGE | 6

se on n

T

g st ect

Move htly eam y he he

with

SE

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Loss\Illproject

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

lness of coreteam memb

GRATERIS)

MANAG

e bers

MupdoCas

D REP

GEMEN

Mitigation Strap plans if thaocuments so ontingency Pssignments

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ategy: Determat person leftnew staff calan: Monitoclosely.

NG AND

AN (PM

mine "key" pt. Keep detan step in mo

or workload

D INTE

MP)

personnel anailed requiremre readily.

d and person

EGRITY

PA

d develop baments

nnel

Y

AGE | 7

ack-

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Risk 3

Descrip

Reliancresourcproject

Risk 4

Descrip

Compestaff resand proinvolvestatus qworkinproject

Risk 5

Descrip

Failureuser req

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

tion -

ce on contraces to accom

goals

tion -

ting demansources - Saogram staff d in mainta

quo while alg on multipinitiatives

tion -

e to identify quirements

GRATERIS)

MANAG

acted mplish

Pr

MasorCof

ds on ame IT are

aining lso

ple new

Pr

MtorequoftaCnoreimm

all

Pr

MexanCprfuredeCre

D REP

GEMEN

robability : Hig

Mitigation Strassociated cosrganized. ontingency Pf completing

robability : Hig

Mitigation Strao the success egularly in wuickly and mf external resasks to occurontingency Pot have hardesources as nmplementatio

modules that w

robability: ME

Mitigation Straxperienced sund the Countontract staffrocess. Priorunctions are meview and acetermine cusontingency Pelease.

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

gh

ategy: Closelts. Keep pro

lan: Make sulong term su

gh

ategy: Execuof this proje

weekly projecmanaging expsources to ac in parallel wlan: Delay im

d deadlines anneeded to accon strategy thwill be most

EDIUM

ategy: Thorouubject mattety Clerk officf is also highlritize requiremet. Developceptance pla

stom code nelan: Address

NG AND

AN (PM

ImpaCOM

COST

ly monitor cooject reposito

ure internal support and a

ImpaON C

PRO

utive manageect; resource ct meetings topectations of ccomplish prwhenever posmplementationd dedicate acomplish prohat prioritizerelied upon

Impa

ugh needs aser experts (foces with sevely experience

ements to ensp and follow an. Conduct geds and prio

s missed func

D INTE

MP)

act : HIGH - AMPLETE WORK

TS INCREASE ontract resouory up to dat

staff is traineadministratio

act : HIGH - MCONTRACT STA

OJECT DEADLIN

ement is stroncontention i

o facilitate restakeholdersoject goals. Sssible. on of other padditional ex

oject goals. Des customizain 2017.

act: MEDIUM

ssessment plaocus groups) eral levels of ed with electsure essentiaa formal reqgap analysis

orities.ctionality in f

EGRITY

PA

ABILITY TO

K BY DEADLINE

urces and te and well

ed and capabon.

MORE RELIANC

AFF; EFFECT O

NES ngly commitis addressed esolving issus. Strategic uSchedule pro

projects that xternal

Develop softwation of those

M

anned with at both the Sapproval. ion projects l business

quirements steps to

future softwa

Y

AGE | 8

E;

ble

CE

ON

tted

es use oject

do

ware e

SOS

and

are

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Risk 6

Descrip

Existingis not fuunderst

Risk 7

Descrip

Reluctastakehoclerk usparticip

Risk 8

Descrip

Difficulconvers

Risk 9

Descrip

SOS chLeaderproject

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

tion -

g Election Pully analyzetood

tion -

ance from kolders or couser communpate

tion -

lty with datsion

tion -

hange in ship could dactivities

GRATERIS)

MANAG

Process ed or

Pr

MprsyduprCenca

key unty nity to

Pr

MeneaanCpr

a

Pr

MofdapacoCdi

disrupt

Pr

Mmhoelsc

D REP

GEMEN

robability: ME

Mitigation Strarocesses and ystem early euring 2016 Project. ontingency Pnvironment tapture and m

robability: LOW

Mitigation Strancourage buyarly in the prnd timely tesontingency Project team c

robability: LOW

Mitigation Straf needs assessata conversioart of the gaponfiguration ontingency Pifficulties ma

robability: LOW

Mitigation Stramanagement p

ow IRIS playlection respocheduled to k

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

EDIUM

ategy: Work perspectives

enough to catPrimary and

lan: Conductto full user a

mitigate prob

W

ategy: Commy-in and partroject and fosting and trailan: Identify

can address n

W TO MEDIU

ategy: Includsment; develon and migrap analysis/deactivities of lan: None - D

ay increase p

W

ategy: Presenplan to new lys an integransibilities. C

keep project

NG AND

AN (PM

Impa

with focus grs. Conduct mtch design flaGeneral elec

t iterative roudience (bey

blems early.

Impa

municate projticipation. Rrm focus groining. potential issneeds/concer

UM Impa

de an analysislop data convation to a devevelopment eFY16.

Data migratioproject cost a

Impa

nt project oveleadership to

al role in the Continue withmomentum

D INTE

MP)

act: MEDIUM

roups to bettmock electionaws. Track lctions and in

oll out of soluyond project

act: HIGH

ject progressRequest clerkoups. Also, e

sues as early rns and garn

act: MEDIUM

s of data migversion stratvelopment en

environment

on is requireand cause del

act: HIGH

erview, beneo gain supporSOS’s abilityh project actgoing.

EGRITY

PA

M

ter understann with new lessons learncorporate in

ution in test team) to

s regularly tok participatioensure adequ

as possible sner participat

M

gration in scotegy. Performnvironment aset up and

ed but lays.

fits and projrt. Demonsty to carry outivities as

Y

AGE | 9

nd

ned nto

o on uate

so tion.

ope m as

ject trate ut its

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Risk 10

Descrip

Softwarsmall bnot be acontracrequire

2.0 PRSTRU

The Projeidentifieshierarchi

2.1 STAKList all oare indivbe positivmay also

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

tion -

re vendor isusiness andable to meetct deliverablements on ti

ROJECT UCTURE

ect Organizas the other orical configur

KEHOLDEf the major siduals and ovely or nega

o exert influe

GRATERIS)

MANAG

Csu

s a d may t le ime

Pr

Mtomthth20deCvere

AUTHO

ation describrganizationaration of thos

ERS stakeholders

organizationsatively affectence over the

D REP

GEMEN

ontingency Puccess of the

robability: ME

Mitigation Strao closely mon

methodology fhe SDLC. Reheir staff to c0% retainageevelopment. ontingency Pendor who caequirements.

ORITY A

bes the roles al groups thase groups. It

s in this projes that are actted as a resule project and

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

lan: None – Lproject.

EDIUM

ategy: Imposenitor tasks anfor QA, requ

equire contracoordinate wie in contractUtilize separlan: None – Van modify th.

AND ORG

and responsat are part of t exists to cla

ect, and statetively involvlt of project

d its results.

NG AND

AN (PM

Leadership s

Impa

e strong projnd quality. Duirements maactor to suppith agency p

t deliverablesrate vendor fVendor is sol

he TotalVote

GANIZA

sibilities of tf the project aarify interact

e why they hved in the pro

execution o

D INTE

MP)

support is ess

act: MEDIUM

ject managemDevelop and management a

ply a project roject manags related to sfor testing acle source andsoftware to m

ATIONAL

the project teand graphication with the

have a stakeoject, or whor project com

EGRITY

PAG

sential to the

M

ment structumaintain cleaand all cyclesmanager froger. Include

software ctivities. d is the only meet NM IR

L

eam. It also ally depicts te project team

. Stakeholdeose interestsmpletion. Th

Y

GE | 10

e

ure ar s of om

RIS

the m.

ers may

hey

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE

PARTICIPAN

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

NAME

BRAD

E

MARY

KARI F

ANDRE

MAND

GREGO

NTS SOS ELADMIN

COUNTSTAFF

MEDIA

BALLOPROGRSYSTE

BALLOSYSTE

PROJEC/IV&V

TESTIN

GRATERIS)

MANAG

WINTER

QUINTANA

FRESQUEZ

EW ROUSH

Y VIGIL

ORY ROCKSTROH

LECTION NISTRATION STA

TY CLERKS AND, STATEWIDE

A & PUBLIC

OT\TABULATOR RAMMGERS; VR EMS; IRIS VENDO

OT PRINTING EM VENDORS

CT MANAGEMENVENDORS

NG VENDOR

D REP

GEMEN

STAKE IN

EXECUTI

EXECUTI

PROJECT

ELECTION

ELECTION

H IT TECHN

AFF SUBJECT

SUBJECT EXPERTSSYSTEM U

EASIER &ACCESS TRESULTS

R

MORE SEINTEGRATIMELY A

MORE SEINTEGRATIMELY A

NT PROVIDEMANAGEALL ASPETO ENSURMEET CUREQUIRE

CONDUCENSURE FUNCTIOPERFORMREQUIRE

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

N PROJECT

VE SPONSOR

VE SPONSOR

SPONSOR and CI

NS BUREAU

NS BUREAU

NICAL LEAD

MATTER EXPER

MATTER S; PRIMARY USER

& MORE TIMELY TO ELECTION

S

EAMLESS SYSTEMATION; MORE ACCESS TO DATA

EAMLESS SYSTEMATION; MORE ACCESS TO DATA

E SERVICES TO E AND CONTROL ECTS OF PROJECRE DELIVERABL

USTOMER EMENTS

T TESTS TO IRIS MEETS

ONAL AND MANCE EMENTS

NG AND

AN (PM

ORGANIZA

SECRETARSTATE’S O

SECRETARSTATE’S O

IO SECRETARSTATE’S O

SECRETARSTATE’S OELECTIONS

SECRETARSTATE’S OELECTIONS

SECRETARSTATE’S ODIVISION

RTS SECRETARSTATE’S O

COUNTY COFFICES

M

A

DOMINION

M

A

AES & ROB

T LES

CSW (PROJMANAGEMBURGER, C(IV&V)

TBD- CONTNEGOTIATPROGRESSNOV, 2015

D INTE

MP)

ATION TI

RY OF FFICE

SE

RY OF FFICE

DEST

RY OF FFICE

ELan

RY OF FFICE – S BUREAU

EL

RY OF FFICE – S BUREAU

EL

RY OF FFICE – IT

SO

RY OF FFICE

EL

CLERK’S COELAD

N & BPRO

BIS

JECT MENT) & CARROLL

TRACT IN TIONS IN S AS OF

EGRITY

PAG

ITLE

ECRETARY OF ST

EPUTY SECRETATATE

LECTIONS DIRECnd CIO

LECTIONS STAFF

LECTIONS STAFF

OFTWARE DEVEL

LECTION STAFF

OUNTY CLERK; LECTION DMINISTRATORS

Y

GE | 11

TATE

ARY OF

CTOR

F

F

LOPER

S

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

2.2 PROJ

2.2.1 DES

County Cler

IT Suppo

Elections  Su

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

JECT GOV

SCRIBE THE

rk Taskforce

ort Staff

upport Staff

GRATERIS)

MANAG

VERNAN

ORGANIZAT

MandElection

D REP

GEMEN

CE STRU

TIONAL STRU

Brad Win Secretary oExecutive S

Mary QuintanSecretary oExecutive S

Kari FresqElections  Dire

Project Sp

dy Vigil, ns  Bureau

Gregory RoSOS Project

Bpro Develop

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

UCTURE

UCTURE – O

nter,of StateSponsor

na, Deputy of StateSponsor

quez,ector/CIOponsor

AndreElectio

ockstroh,  Manager

pment Staff

NG AND

AN (PM

ORG CHART

ew Roush,ons  Bureau

D INTE

MP)

EGRITY

PAG

Burger, CarroAssociates

IV&V Contrac

CSW EnterprisPM Contract

TBDTesting Contra

Y

GE | 12

oll 

tor

sesor

ctor

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

2.2.2 DES

ROLE

EXECUTSPONSO

PROJEC

SOS PROMANAGCAL LEA

USER EDCLERK

DEVELOTEAM

CORE PRTEAM

FOCUS G

ES

CO

ITS

ES

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

SCRIBE THE

TIVE OR(S)

CT SPONSO

OJECT GER/TECHNAD

DUCATIONLIAISON

OPMENT

ROJECT

GROUPS

Election upport Staff

County ClerkOffice Staff

T Support taff

External olution

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ROLE AND M

RESPON

Ensure

R MaintaSecuresclear reApprovavailab

NI

Ensuredeliverapproprissues aoverall

N/ Ensurecommumeetinglogistic

Ensure custominput inpotentiproject

Core prand clethe proj

f

k

Act as produciproject responswill be oversigcommitimpleminto proparticip

D REP

GEMEN

MEMBERS OF

NSIBILITY

appropriate

ains ultimate s executive cequirements ves plans, scbility of resou

s SOS projeables are beiriate commuare being ideproject is be

s frequent counicate and rgs, and devecs coordinati

product is dmer expectationto requiremal solutions,team throug

roject stakeherk liaison wject, setting

subject matting deliverabsponsor and

sible for testresponsible

ght. Externalttee and will

mentation deloject at apprpating in req

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

F THE PROJE

resources an

authority ovcommitmentand directiohedules, andurces.

ct resources ing met, deliunication is oentified, repoeing comple

ommunicatioresolve counelops and oveion with cler

developed acons are met.

ments and des and acting a

gh the full so

holders incluill assist in dproject requ

ter experts bybles within td project manting and accefor infrastru

l solution prol be primarilliverables. Propriate timequirements ga

NG AND

AN (PM

ECT STEERIN

nd priority i

ver, and respt, approvals,

on are providd budgets, an

are being miverable acceoccurring wiorted, and m

eted as define

on with clerknty clerk conersees trainirks.

ccording to s The develosign, developas technical oftware deve

uding managdriving the duirements, an

y sharing of the project s

anager. Businepting deliveucture deplooviders will ly responsiblProject Teames to completathering or u

D INTE

MP)

NG COMMITT

s set for the

ponsibility fo, and fundingded for the pnd ensures ti

managed, proeptance is ocith project co

mitigated anded.

ks, acts as clncerns duringing efforts. M

specificationopment team ping prototyexperts in le

elopment life

gement, devedirection andnd logistical

f expertise. Rcope as definess users werables. IT Ayment and imbe selected ble for major

m members wte deliverabluser accepta

EGRITY

PAG

TEE

project.

or, the projecg. Ensures roject. imely

oject ccurring, ommittee, an

d that the

lerk liaison tg project Manages

ns and ensurimust provid

ypes, validatieading the e cycle.

elopment tead decisions o

managemen

Responsible ined by the

will generallyAdministratomplementatiby the steeriproject

will be pulledles such as

ance testing.

Y

GE | 13

ct.

nd

to

ing de ing

am, of nt.

for

y be ors ion ing

d

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

ROLE

P

IV&V CONTRA

PM CON

TESTINGCONTRA

2.2.3 OR

T T

colofo

2.3 EXEC E

CA

Eon

Pw

TC

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

roviders

ACTOR

NTRACTOR

G ACTOR

RGANIZATION

The Project MThe Clerk Liaounty clerk oogistical taskormal comm

CUTIVE RExecutive spoCommittee wAcceptance oExecutive spo

n weekly staroject spons

when they areThe Agency CCommittee m

GRATERIS)

MANAG

RESPON

IV&V requireof the p

R Senior resourcdeliveroccurrireportecomple

Testingto minitest plamanageimplem

NAL BOUNDA

Manager is exaison will woffices to coks with Coun

munication pr

REPORTIonsor(s) are

which is respoof all Deliveronsor(s) are atus report cosor is respone unable to aCIO is respo

members. 

D REP

GEMEN

NSIBILITY

will be utilizments are be

project.

project mances are beingable acceptang with projd, and mitig

eted as defin

g contractor wimize risk. Tan developmement and m

mentation pha

ARIES, INTE

xpected to cork with sub

ommunicate nty Clerk Ofreparation.

NGrequired to ponsible for frables as direincluded in orrespondensible for comattend status onsible for re

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

zed to ensureeing implem

nager who is g managed, pance is occurject committ

gated and thaed.

will guide thThey will havent. They wi

monitoring ofase.

RFACES AND

coordinate mbject matter estatus, articu

ffices such a

participate infinal approvaected by the the weekly p

nce. mmunicating

meetings. eporting to th

NG AND

AN (PM

e adequacy omented as def

lead for the project delivrring, approptee, and issuat the overall

he testing neve influence ill also servef testing thro

D RESPONSIB

meetings and experts, focuulate and res

as coordinatin

n the bi-weeal of all projeSecretary o

project statu

g project stat

he DoIT and

D INTE

MP)

of planning fined in the p

project. Ensverables are bpriate commues are beingl project is b

eeds of the pron the testin

e to assist wioughout the

BILITIES

product delius groups, ansolve issues, ng testing, tr

ekly Executivect Requiremf State 

us meetings a

tus to execut

d the Project

EGRITY

PAG

and that planning pha

sures projectbeing met,

munication is g identified, being

roject in ordng strategy aith

ivery. nd statewideand manage

raining, and

ve Steering ments and

and are inclu

tive sponsor

t Certificatio

Y

GE | 14

ase

t

der and

e e

uded

s

on

3

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Tpr

3.0 SCOP

3.1 PROJ

3.1.1 BUS

NUMBE

BUSINESOBJECTI

BUSINESOBJECTI

BUSINESOBJECTI

BUSINESOBJECTI

BUSINESOBJECTI

3.1.2 TEC

NUMBE

TECHNICOBJECTI

TECHNICOBJECTI

TECHNICOBJECTI

TECHNICOBJECTI

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

The IV&V Croject. 

PE

JECT OBJ

SINESS OBJE

ER

SS IVE 1

SS IVE 2

SS IVE 3

SS IVE 4

SS IVE 5

CHNICAL OB

ER

CAL IVE 1

CAL IVE 2

CAL IVE 3

CAL IVE 4

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ontractor wi

JECTIVE

ECTIVES

DESCR

Improvmanual

Reduceadequat

Establisadminis

Improvproductcustomcounty Improv

BJECTIVES

DESCR

Utilize statewid

Reduce

Ensure applica

Replace

D REP

GEMEN

ill provide bi

S

RIPTION

ve efficiencyl processes a

e costs – redutely meet NM

sh standardstration area

ve customer ts that are n

m, agile systeclerks.

ve voter data

RIPTION

IT to automde.

e IT system c

business conations are add

e and consol

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

imonthly rep

– automate and improve

uce reliance M election r

dization anas.

satisfactionnot prone tom that meet

validation a

mate, standard

complexity.

ntinuity requdressed.

lidate legacy

NG AND

AN (PM

ports through

time consumintegration b

on costly sorequirements

nd uniform

n – Reduceo integrationts the require

and data inte

dize, and str

uirements of

y equipment

D INTE

MP)

hout the dur

ming and errbetween ele

oftware systes.

mity in cri

e reliance on by implemements of th

egrity via sys

eamline elec

f mission cri

and applicat

EGRITY

PAG

ation of the

ror prone ction system

ems that do n

itical elect

on commercmenting a mohe SOS and

stem interfac

ction process

itical

tions.

Y

GE | 15

ms.

not

ion

cial ore the

ces

ses

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

NUMBE

TECHNICOBJECTI

TECHNICOBJECTI

3.2 PROJ

This projdevelopinInformatreduce du

3.3 CRITI

Identify tunderstanBusinessSee also

NUMBE

QUALITY

QUALITY

QUALITY

QUALITY

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ER

CAL IVE 5

CAL IVE 6

JECT EXC

ject will inclng key systeion System ouplicate key

ICAL SUC

the critical snding the ab Owner, as wsection 6.7 Q

ER

Y METRICS

Y METRICS

Y METRICS

Y METRICS

GRATERIS)

MANAG

DESCR

Implemintegratstate re

Reduce

CLUSION

lude replacinem interfacesor e-pollbooentry.

CCESS FA

uccess factoility of the pwell as the aQuality Obje

DESCR

1 Ability includinLive, an

2

Regularduration

3

Project and pladecision

4 Project

D REP

GEMEN

RIPTION

ment moderntes critical pquirements a

e IT mainten

NS

ng many elecs. However,

ok systems, h

ACTORS

ors for achievproject to meability of the ectives and C

RIPTION

to export anng tabulationnd election nr executive sn of the proj

o Requo Risko Finao Chano Deli

developmen

ans must cleans made dur

stays on tim

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

, custom elerocesses andare met.

nance costs.

ction managit does not i

however, inte

ving successeet the end gproject team

Controls.

nd import dan software, bnight reportisteering comject to facilituirements m

k managemeancial oversinge\Issue miverables acc

nt methodoloarly reflect thring this proj

me, on scope

NG AND

AN (PM

ection managd systems wh

ement systeminclude replaerfacing wit

s in this projegoals of the Em to stay wit

ata seamlesslballot printining.

mmittee meettate:

managementnt

ight management

ceptance

ogy must behe project deject.

, and within

D INTE

MP)

gement systehile ensuring

ms and procacing the Cath these syste

ect. Metric aExecutive Spthin schedule

ly across votng systems, D

tings must b

e followed – eliverables, t

n budget.

EGRITY

PAG

em that g federal and

cesses and ampaign Finaems is plann

are key to ponsor and the and budget

ting systemsDemocracy

be held for th

all documentasks, and

Y

GE | 16

d

ance ned to

he t.

s

he

nts

4

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

NUMBE

QUALITY

4.0 PROJ

4.1 PROJ

PROJEC

INITIATPHASE:

PLANNIDESIGN

IMPLEMPHASE:IMPLEM

CLOSEOMAINTE

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ER

Y METRICS

JECT DE

JECT MAN

CT PHASE

TION : DEFINE

ING PHASEN

MENTATIO: DEVELOP

MENT

OUT PHASENANCE

GRATERIS)

MANAG

DESCR

5 Measurfeedbac

ELIVERA

NAGEME

DELIV

E:

ON P\

SE:

D REP

GEMEN

RIPTION

re enhanced ck received i

ABLES A

ENT LIFE

VERABLE

Define soft

Define maj

Gap Analy

Project Ma

Map Busin

Define TecArchitectur

IV&V Con

PM Contra

Developme

Testing Co

System Derequiremen

Data Conve

User Accepexecution

End User T

Implementa

IT Adminisimplemente

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

service delivin regards to

AND ME

E CYCLE

tware require

or milestone

sis between

anagement Pl

ness Requirem

chnical and Are to include

ntract Award

act Award

ent and Impl

ntract Awar

sign & Devents, customiz

ersion Plan

ptance and T

Training Doc

ation Strateg

stration standed

NG AND

AN (PM

very and useo the project.

ETHODO

ements and i

es and set pr

current syst

lan

ments to Fun

Application e security

d

lementation

rd

elopment Plazations, repo

Test Plans –

cumentation

gy –producti

dards and bu

D INTE

MP)

er satisfactio.

OLOGY

implementat

roject critica

tems and pro

nctional Des

Specification

Contract Aw

an – Finalizeorting, and se

Mock electi

ion cutover s

usiness conti

EGRITY

PAG

on via positiv

tion strategy

al path

oposed system

sign

ns &

ward – BPro

e system desecurity profi

on setup and

strategy

inuity mode

Y

GE | 17

ve

y

ms

sign iles

d

l

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

4.1.1 PRO

Project Dmethodorequirem

DELIVERA

NUMBER

DEL-1

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

OJECT MAN

Deliverables logy require

ments of the p

ABLE DE

ProCh

GRATERIS)

MANAG

AGEMENT D

are work proements and sproject.

ELIVERABLE

oject harter

D REP

GEMEN

Production

Software m

Lessons Le

DELIVERABL

oducts or arttandard proj

DESCRI

The Projoverall sstructurepermissiProject Cprovide with aderelated pphase of

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

n monitoring

maintenance

earned

LES

tifacts that arject managem

PTION

oject Charter scope for thee, and when ion to proceCharter for Cthe Project C

equate knowplanning to cf the project

NG AND

AN (PM

and adminis

terms docum

are driven byment practic

r for Certifice project, thesigned is coed with the pCertificationCertification

wledge of thecertify the in.

D INTE

MP)

stration

mented

y the project ces regardles

ation sets the governanconsidered project. The

n is used to n Committeee project andnitiation

EGRITY

PAG

managemenss of the prod

ACCEPT

e e

e d

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

AccordinrequiremeState of Nand proce

StandardContent Format

Accordinrequiremestandardstemplates

Quality R

Monthly bowners anteam.

Presentatirequired acertificatiDoIT and

Y

GE | 18

nt duct

ANCE

ble nce

ng to DoIT ents and

NM policies edures.

ds for and

ng to DoIT ents, s and s.

Review

by business nd project

ion as and ion by d PCC.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL-2

DEL-3

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

CeFo

ProMaPla

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ertification rm

oject anagement an

D REP

GEMEN

The Reof Fundgoes fordeals wproject, the leveproject. incorporproject c

“Project documenand the Odevelopeproject eThe primdocumenfacilitateand docuscheduleleast othecontrol, cand accemanagem

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

quest for Cds form is sur any of the

with the finas well as o

el of planninMany of t

rated into charter.

management nt approved bOffice of the Sed in the plan execution, conmary uses of thnt planning ase communicatument approve baselines. Aer plans for iscommunicatio

eptance, staff ment.

NG AND

AN (PM

Certification ubmitted whe certificationancial aspother topics ng that has gthe questionthe prepara

t plan” is a forby the executivSecretary of Sphase used to

ntrol, and projhe project plassumptions antion among stved scope, cos

A project plan ssue escalatioons, deliverabacquisition, a

D INTE

MP)

and Releashen a projecon phases. Ipects of th

that indicatgone into thns have beenation of th

rmal ve sponsor State and o manage ject close. an are to nd decisions, takeholders, st and includes at

on, change ble review and risk

EGRITY

PAG

e ct It

he te he n

he

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

AccordinrequiremeState of Nand proce

StandardContent Format

Accordinrequiremestandardstemplates

Quality R

Monthly bowners anteam.

Presentatirequired acertificatiDoIT and

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

Accordinrequiremestandardstemplates

StandardContent Format

Accordinrequiremestandardstemplates

Y

GE | 19

ble nce

ng to DoIT ents and

NM policies edures.

ds for and

ng to DoIT ents, s and s.

Review

by business nd project

ion as and ion by d PCC.

ble nce

ng to DoIT ents, s and s.

ds for and

ng to DoIT ents, s and s.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL-4

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

IVCoRe

GRATERIS)

MANAG

&V ontract & eports

D REP

GEMEN

“Indepen(IV&V)”project torequiremwhether phase fulthe previby an orgagency. Iassessmeall projecindependcontracto

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ndent verifica” means the po determine c

ments and the the products lfill the requirious stage, boganization indIndependent vent reporting.cts subject to dent verificatior unless waiv

NG AND

AN (PM

ation and validprocess of evacompliance wprocess of deof a given derements estab

oth of which adependent of verification a The Departmoversight to

ion and validaved by the De

D INTE

MP)

dation aluating a

with specified etermining evelopment blished duringare performedthe lead

and validationment requires engage an ation epartment.

EGRITY

PAG

Quality R

Monthly bowners anteam.

Presentatirequired acertificatiDoIT and

g d

n

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

Shall be rand approSOS projcommittetasks beincompletedtested.

StandardContent Format

Will be acDoIT requfor IT ProServices Cscope, terconditionbe determapproval Project StCommitteproject te

Y

GE | 20

Review

by business nd project

ion as and ion by d PCC.

ble nce

reviewed oved by the ect steering

ee of all ng d and

ds for and

ccording to uirements ofessional Contract rms and ns and shall mined by the

of the teering ee and eam.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL-5

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

PM

GRATERIS)

MANAG

M Contract

D REP

GEMEN

The SOon SOS externalthe risk.bring asand aid

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

S identified are a risk to

l PM resourc. In addition,s undefined bits success.

NG AND

AN (PM

that competo the project.ce will serve, expert expebenefits to th

D INTE

MP)

ting demand. Use of an

e to mitigate erience will he project

EGRITY

PAG

Quality R

Will be acDoIT requfor IT ProServices Cscope, terconditionbe determapproval Project StCommitteproject te

s DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

Shall be rand approSOS projcommittetasks beincompletedtested.

StandardContent Format

Will be acDoIT requfor IT ProServices Cscope, terconditionbe determapproval Project StCommitteproject te

Y

GE | 21

Review

ccording to uirements ofessional Contract rms and ns and shall mined by the

of the teering ee and eam.

ble nce

reviewed oved by the ect steering

ee of all ng d and

ds for and

ccording to uirements ofessional Contract rms and ns and shall mined by the

of the teering ee and eam.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL-6

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

TeCo

GRATERIS)

MANAG

sting ontract

D REP

GEMEN

The SOon SOS externalserve tothe testiSOS. Exundefinesuccess.

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

S identified are a risk to

l, expert-levemitigate the

ng strategy axpert experieed benefits t.

NG AND

AN (PM

that competo the project.el testing rese risk as weland processeence will brito the projec

D INTE

MP)

ting demand. Use of an source will ll as improvees in the ing as

ct and aid its

EGRITY

PAG

Quality R

Will be acDoIT requfor IT ProServices Cscope, terconditionbe determapproval Project StCommitteproject te

s

e

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

Shall be rand approSOS projcommittetasks beincompletedtested.

StandardContent Format

Will be acDoIT requfor IT ProServices Cscope, terconditionbe determapproval Project StCommitteproject te

Y

GE | 22

Review

ccording to uirements ofessional Contract rms and ns and shall mined by the

of the teering ee and eam.

ble nce

reviewed oved by the ect steering

ee of all ng d and

ds for and

ccording to uirements ofessional Contract rms and ns and shall mined by the

of the teering ee and eam.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL-7

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

IT Co

GRATERIS)

MANAG

Service ontracts

D REP

GEMEN

The Depand the Generaltemplate

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

partment of IState Purcha

l Services hae for all IT r

NG AND

AN (PM

Information asing Divisioave establishrelated contra

D INTE

MP)

n Technologyon of

hed a acts.

EGRITY

PAG

Quality R

Will be acDoIT requfor IT ProServices Cscope, terconditionbe determapproval Project StCommitteproject te

y DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

Shall be rand approSOS projcommittetasks beincompletedtested.

StandardContent Format

Will be acDoIT requfor IT ProServices Cscope, terconditionbe determapproval Project StCommitteproject te

Y

GE | 23

Review

ccording to uirements ofessional Contract rms and ns and shall mined by the

of the teering ee and eam.

ble nce

reviewed oved by the ect steering

ee of all ng d and

ds for and

ccording to uirements ofessional Contract rms and ns and shall mined by the

of the teering ee and eam.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL-8

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

RisAsandMa

GRATERIS)

MANAG

sk sessment d anagement

D REP

GEMEN

The DASSESSfulfill thwritten inceptioproduct more freEach risproject aOversig

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

DoIT InitiSMENT temhe following

risk asseon of a proj

developmeequently forsk assessmenactivity in p

ght Process m

NG AND

AN (PM

ial PROJEmplate whichg requiremenssment repject and at ent lifecyclr large high-rnt shall be i

project schedmemorandum

D INTE

MP)

ECT RISKh is meant tont: “Prepare port at thend of each

le phase orisk projectsincluded as dule.” Projecm.

EGRITY

PAG

Quality R

Will be acDoIT requfor IT ProServices Cscope, terconditionbe determapproval Project StCommitteproject te

K o a

he h

or s. a

ct

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

As set forContract Aor requireProject Taccordingrequiremestandardstemplates

StandardContent Format

Accordinrequiremestandardstemplates

Y

GE | 24

Review

ccording to uirements ofessional Contract rms and ns and shall mined by the

of the teering ee and eam.

ble nce

rth in the Agreement ed by the eam and

g to DoIT ents, s and s.

ds for and

ng to DoIT ents, s and s.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL-9

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ProSch

GRATERIS)

MANAG

oject hedule

D REP

GEMEN

A tool udependeperformmileston

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

used to indicencies, and a

ming activitienes.

NG AND

AN (PM

ate the plannassigned resoes and for me

D INTE

MP)

ned dates, ources for eeting

EGRITY

PAG

Quality R

Weekly mand risk uProject MProject TExecutiveCommitte

Project Mfollows pescalationchanges tor new ris

Risk ManPlan and included with certidocumentand PCC presentatimonthly r

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

Weekly: PManagerteam monand documprogress a

Weekly: uproject scincluded wProject StReport toSponsors Steering C

Updated sprovided with DoITcertificatidocument

Y

GE | 25

Review

monitoring updates by

Manager to eam and e Steering ee.

Manager proper n steps with to existing sks.

nagement Risk Log as required ification ts for DoIT

ions and reporting.

ble nce

Project and project

nitor tasks ment and issues.

updated chedule with tatus

o Executive and

Committee.

schedule as required T and PCC ion ts.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL-10

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

MoProReDo

GRATERIS)

MANAG

onthly oject Status

eports to oIT

D REP

GEMEN

s Project srequire Dproject mapprovedbasis to t

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

status reports.Department ovmanager shall d project statuthe Departme

NG AND

AN (PM

For all projeversight, the l submit an agus report on aent.

D INTE

MP)

ects that lead agency

gency a monthly

EGRITY

PAG

StandardContent Format

MS ProjeExcel For

Quality R

Weekly rProject TProject Sp

Presentatirequired acertificatiDoIT and

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

Project Mprovides updated MReport informat byeach mon

Monthly Report suDoIT by teach mon

StandardContent Format

DoIT MoReport tem

Quality R

Review bProject Oand clarifprovided by SOS

Y

GE | 26

ds for and

ect or MS rmat.

Review

eview by eam and ponsors.

ion as and ion by d PCC.

ble nce

Manager SOS with

Monthly n DoIT y the 9th of nth.

Status ubmitted to the 10th of

nth.

ds for and

onthly mplate.

Review

by DoIT Oversight fication as needed

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL-11

4.1.2 DEL

Completethe perso

DEL

NUM

DEL

DEL

DEL

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ProCloRe

LIVERABLE

e the followion or persons

LIVERABLE

MBER

L-001

L-002

L-003

GRATERIS)

MANAG

oject oseout

eport

APPROVAL A

ing table to is who have a

DELIVER

Project C

InitiationCertificat

Project M

D REP

GEMEN

This is tproject bproject ccertifica

AUTHORITY

identify the dauthority to a

RABLE

Charter

n & Planningtion Form

Management

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

the Templatebe officially closure is theation process

Y DESIGNATI

deliverablesapprove each

g Phase

Plan (PMP)

NG AND

AN (PM

e used to reqy closed. Note last phase s.

IONS

s this projecth deliverabl

APPROV

(WHO C

APPROV

Project & Agen

Project & Agen

) Project

D INTE

MP)

quest that thete that of the

t is to produce.

VERS

CAN

VE)

Sponsor ncy CIO

Sponsor ncy CIO

Sponsor

EGRITY

PAG

e DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

Accordinrequiremetemplatesof NM poprocedure

StandardContent Format

DoIT andNM.

Quality R

Monthly bowners anteam.

Presentatirequired acertificatiDoIT and

ce, and to na

DATE APP

October 7

October 2

Initial Sept24, 2013;

Y

GE | 27

ble nce

ng to DoIT ents and s and State olicies and es.

ds for and

d State of

Review

by business nd project

ion as and ion by d PCC.

ame

PROVED

7, 2013

3, 2013

tember

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DEL

NUM

DEL

DEL

DEL

DEL

DEL

DEL

DEL

DEL

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

LIVERABLE

MBER

L-004

L-005

L_006

L-007

L-008

L-009

L-010

L-011

GRATERIS)

MANAG

DELIVER

IV&V Co

#19173 BAssociate

IV&V Re

PM Cont

Contract Enterpris

ENR TesAmendm

ENR Concontract#ActivitiesDue date

IT ServicImplemen

BPRO FYCONTRAPROGREdate: 2/1/

Risk Ass

Project S

Monthly DoIT

Project C

D REP

GEMEN

RABLE

ontract Phas

Burger, Carres

eports

tract Phase 3

# 19172, CSses, LLC

sting Contracment Phase 3

ntract amend#19173 execus commence: 3/1/2016

ce Contractsntation

Y16 GAP ANACT SIGNAESS AS OF /2016

essment and

chedule

Project Statu

Closeout Rep

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

e 3

roll

SW

ct

dment to uted.

ed in 1/2016.

Phase 3

NALYSIS ATURES IN 01/2016. Du

d Manageme

us Reports to

port

NG AND

AN (PM

APPROV

(WHO C

APPROV

& Agen

Project & Agen

Project & Agen

.

Project & Agen

N ue

Project & Agen

ent Project & Agen

Project & Agen

o Agency

Project & Agen

D INTE

MP)

VERS

CAN

VE)

ncy CIO

Sponsor ncy CIO

Sponsor ncy CIO

Sponsor ncy CIO

Sponsor ncy CIO

Sponsor ncy CIO

Sponsor ncy CIO

y CIO

Sponsor ncy CIO

EGRITY

PAG

DATE APP

Revision 2/1/2016

Contract AAugust 20

Reports: T

Contract AAugust 20

Reports: T

ENR ConAmendmeExecution

January 20

Reports: T

BPro TBD

Upon finalsignature

Weekly, asupdated

Monthly, aproduced

On project

Y

GE | 28

PROVED

Award 15

TBD

Award 15

TBD

ntract nt

016

TBD

l

s

as

t close

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

4.1.3 DEL

Describe

TthCprww

Ifois

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

LIVERABLE

the process

The Project Shat specifica

County Clerkroject manag

will vote to acwriting, to the

f the deliveraf the reason s presented f

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ACCEPTANC

that this pro

Sponsor and tions and req

k Focus Grouger will repoccept or rejee Project Spo

able is rejectfor the rejec

for acceptanc

D REP

GEMEN

CE PROCEDU

oject will use

the project tquirements aup will be enort testing reect the deliveonsor for ap

ted, the projection, and acce again.

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

URE

e for the form

team will revand/or contrangaged for usults back toerable and prproval of pa

ect team wilctions require

NG AND

AN (PM

mal acceptan

view compleact obligatio

user acceptano core projecrovide the te

ayment of ve

ll inform theed by the ven

D INTE

MP)

nce of all de

eted deliveraons have beence testing, act team. Theeam’s majoriendor invoice

Project Spondor before

EGRITY

PAG

liverables:

ables to certien satisfied. as needed, an project teamity decision,es.

onsor, in writthe delivera

Y

GE | 29

ify

nd m , in

ting, able

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

4.2 PROD

“During developmPROCES

Phase

Initiation

Planning

Impleme

Testing

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

DUCT LIF

the project mment lifecyclSS Memoran

n

g & Design

ntation

GRATERIS)

MANAG

FE CYCLE

managementle methodolondum

D REP

GEMEN

E

t lifecycle, agogy approve

Summary o

Project scopdeliverables

Definition orequiremenbreakdown

Implementaconfiguratiosoftware, haand customreports

User accept

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

gencies shald by the Dep

of Phase

pe of work as identified

of system ts, work schedule

ation and on of projectardware, dat

mizations incl

tance testing

NG AND

AN (PM

ll select and partment.” P

K

and Pr

G

Pr

TA

W

RePl

SoFYDco

IV

PM

ENIV

t tabases, luding

SoCom

D

Dan

UACo

g(UAT) UA

D INTE

MP)

implement aPROJECT O

Key Delivera

roject Charte

ap Analysis

roject Manag

ARC docum

Work Breakdo

equirementslan

oftware DesiY16 Gap Anevelopment

onfiguration

V&V Contra

M Contract

NR Testing V&V Contra

oftware Devontract FY1

modernization

ata Convers

esign, confignd deploy so

AT and Systontract

AT Test Pla

EGRITY

PAG

a phase prodOVERSIGHT

ables

er

gement Plan

ments

own Structu

s Manageme

ign Contractnalysis and Environmen

act

amendment act

velopment 7 Software n and rollout

ion

gure, build, toftware solut

tem Testing

ans

Y

GE | 30

duct T

n

ure

nt

t

nt

to

t

test, tion.

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Phase

Deploym

Maintena

4.2.1 TEC

This projelection msuccessfuMicrosofneeded toincludinguptime w

Unlike thlicenses amanagemThe databinformatifactor audevice. A

The sourFoundatistaff and the systembe condu

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ment

ance

CHNICAL ST

ject will inclmanagementul solution bft Azure mano dynamicalg early votin

with geo-repl

he existing eallowing the

ment staff anbases will beion will be mthentication

Audit trails a

rce code willion and the oby external m will be m

ucted using th

GRATERIS)

MANAG

TRATEGY

lude installint system for uilt in a Micnaged servicly increase s

ng and electiolication capa

lection manae software tond polling site encrypted,masked by de. Users must

are maintaine

l be owned aongoing mainvendor suppaintained in he test instan

D REP

GEMEN

Summary o

and System

Transition tproduction

Maintenancdecommissiproject closlearned

ng and custouse in New

crosoft SQL ce environmesystem resouon night repoabilities for b

agement syso be utilized tes as needed connectionsefault on thet login with ed for all dat

and maintainntenance andport. A separorder to cre

nce of the sy

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

of Phase

m testing

to operationsenvironmen

ce of new syioning old syseout and les

mizing the eMexico. ThServer & .N

ent. This soluurces during orting time pbusiness con

stem in New and deployed. System ses will be via e user interfaa user name ta changes.

ned by New Md support wirate developate formal so

ystem.

NG AND

AN (PM

K

SyTe

M

D

s in nt

Pr

En

Sy

ystems; ystems; ssons

Mfo

Anag

existing Southe Total VoteNet software ution will prpeak times i

periods. Thentinuity.

Mexico, thied to state, coecurity will b 248 bit SSLace. Users wand passwo

Mexico in Vill be comple

pment, test, aoftware rele

D INTE

MP)

Key Delivera

ystem and Peesting

Mock Election

elivery Sign

roduction Cu

nd user train

ystem Docum

Maintenance aor internal IT

nnual maintgreements w

th Dakota Te solution is platform run

rovide the SOin the electio

e solution pro

is solution haounty, and lobe much impL, and sensit

will authenticord plus use a

Visual Studioeted by bothand productioease gates. Tr

EGRITY

PAG

ables

erformance

n Plan

n Off Docum

utover Plan

ning

mentation

and support T operations

enance with vendor(s

otal Vote a highly nning in the OS the agiliton cycle ovides 99%

as unlimitedocal electionproved as weive voter

cate via two a USB eTok

o Team h internal SOon instance raining will

Y

GE | 31

ments

plan

s)

ty

d user n ell.

ken

OS IT of also

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Maintenacontinuinannual sawill also externallyautomate

4.2.2 PRO

Product Dmethodorequirem

DELIVE

NUMBE

PRJ-1

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ance costs arng maintenanavings by redincrease sysy hosted and

e many manu

ODUCT AND

Deliverableslogy require

ments of the p

ERABLE

ER D

D

GRATERIS)

MANAG

re expected tnce on existiducing hardwstem integratd supported sual processe

PRODUCT D

s are work prements and sproject.

DELIVERABLE

Design Docum

D REP

GEMEN

to dramaticaing systems.ware refreshtion where nsystems thats, and increa

DEVELOPME

roducts or artandard proj

E

ments

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ally decrease The SOS an

h and annual needed, elimt don’t meet ase election o

NT DELIVER

rtifacts that aject managem

DESCRIPTI

Software DDocument/

Gap Analy

Requireme

NG AND

AN (PM

e by year threnticipates resoftware lic

minate the useexisting busoversight ca

RABLES

are driven byment practic

ION

Design /Vendor Pro

ysis

ents Manage

D INTE

MP)

ee of the proealizing overcenses expene and cost fosiness requirapabilities.

y the producces regardles

oposal

ement Plan

EGRITY

PAG

oject comparr $600,000 innses. The SOor existing rements,

ct managemess of the prod

ACCEPTA

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

As definecontract sof work aapprovedproject steering committeand IT operationstaff

Standardfor Contand Form

As definecontract sof work

Y

GE | 32

red to n

OS

ent duct

ANCE

ble nce

ed in scope and d by

ee

ns

ds ent mat

ed in scope

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

PRJ-2

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

Sy

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ystems Spec

D REP

GEMEN

cifications

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

Data conve

Map businfunctional

Software cspecificatio

NG AND

AN (PM

ersion specif

ness requiremdesign

customizatioons

D INTE

MP)

fications

ments to

on

EGRITY

PAG

Quality Review

Weekly smeeting wproject steering committe

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

As definecontract sof work aapprovedproject steering committeand IT operationstaff

Standardfor Contand Form

As definecontract sof work

Quality Review

Weekly smeeting wproject steering committe

Y

GE | 33

status with

ee

ble nce

ed in scope and d by

ee

ns

ds ent mat

ed in scope

status with

ee

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

PRJ-3

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

Sy

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ystems Arch

D REP

GEMEN

hitecture

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

IT Infrastrutechnical, asecurity

NG AND

AN (PM

ucture Diagrapplication,

D INTE

MP)

rams – and

EGRITY

PAG

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

As definecontract sof work aapprovedproject steering committeand IT operationstaff

Standardfor Contand Form

As definecontract sof work

Quality Review

Weekly smeeting wproject steering committe

Y

GE | 34

ble nce

ed in scope and d by

ee

ns

ds ent mat

ed in scope

status with

ee

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

PRJ-4

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

SyTe

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ystem and Aesting

D REP

GEMEN

Acceptance

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

FunctionalUAT

Mock Elec

System and

NG AND

AN (PM

l software te

ction Plan

d Performan

D INTE

MP)

st plan –

nce testing

EGRITY

PAG

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

As definecontract sof work aapprovedproject steering committeand IT operationstaff

Standardfor Contand Form

As definecontract sof work

Quality Review

Weekly smeeting wproject steering committe

Y

GE | 35

ble nce

ed in scope and d by

ee

ns

ds ent mat

ed in scope

status with

ee

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

PRJ-5

4.2.3 DEL

Completethe perso

DELIVE

NUMBE

PRJ-1

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

O

LIVERABLE

e the followion or persons

ERABLE

ER

GRATERIS)

MANAG

Operations re

APPROVAL A

ing table to is who have a

DELIVERA

Design Do

D REP

GEMEN

quirements

AUTHORITY

identify the dauthority to a

ABLE

ocuments

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

Training M

Business P

Y DESIGNATI

deliverablesapprove each

NG AND

AN (PM

Manuals

Process Diag

IONS

s this projecth deliverabl

APPROV

CAN AP

Project Project

D INTE

MP)

grams

t is to produce.

VERS (WHO

PPROVE)

Team and Sponsor

EGRITY

PAG

DeliverabAcceptanCriteria

As definecontract sof work aapprovedproject steering committeand IT operationstaff

Standardfor Contand Form

As definecontract sof work

Quality Review

Weekly smeeting wproject steering committe

ce, and to na

O DATE

APPROV

Y

GE | 36

ble nce

ed in scope and d by

ee

ns

ds ent mat

ed in scope

status with

ee

ame

VED

5

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

DELIVE

NUMBE

PRJ-2

PRJ-3

PRJ-4

PRJ-5

4.2.4 DEL

Describe

TthCMScoo

IfSb

5.0 PROJ

5.1 WORK

A WBS iwork scostructure package objective

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ERABLE

ER

LIVERABLE

the process

The Project Shat specifica

County ClerkManager will

teering Comommittee’s mf vendor inv

f the deliveraponsor, in wefore the del

JECT WO

K BREAK

is a deliverabope of the pro

(WBS) or thidentifier an

es, and the m

GRATERIS)

MANAG

DELIVERA

Systems S

Systems A

System an

Operation

ACCEPTANC

that this pro

Sponsor and tions and req

k Focus Groul prepare test

mmittee memmajority dec

voices.

able is rejectwriting, of thliverable is p

ORK

KDOWN S

ble-oriented oject. Descrihe work pac

nd provide a milestones an

D REP

GEMEN

ABLE

Specification

Architectur

nd Acceptan

ns requirem

CE PROCEDU

oject will use

the project tquirements aups will be eting results d

mbers will vocision, in wri

ted, the Exece reason for presented for

STRUCTU

grouping ofibe the workkages withingeneral desc

nd deliverabl

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ns

e

nce Testing

ments

URE

e for the form

team will revand/or contraengaged for udata for revieote to accept iting, to the P

cutive Steerithe rejectionr acceptance

URE (WB

f project elemk activities thn the WBS. Icription of thles of each w

NG AND

AN (PM

APPROV

CAN AP

Project Project

Project Project

g Project Project

Project Project

mal acceptan

view compleact obligatiouser acceptaew by the pror reject theProject Spon

ing Committn, and actione again.

BS)

ments that orhat compriseIdentify the he tasks or awork packag

D INTE

MP)

VERS (WHO

PPROVE)

Team and Sponsor

Team and Sponsor

Team and Sponsor

Team and Sponsor

nce of all de

eted deliveraons have beeance testing aroject team. e deliverablensor for appr

tee will inforns required b

rganizes ande the work brWBS eleme

activities, thee.

EGRITY

PAG

O DATE

APPROV

October 2015

October 2015

liverables.

ables to certien satisfied. and the ProjeThe Executi

e and providroval of pay

rm the Projeby the vendo

d defines thereakdown

ent or other we definition o

Y

GE | 37

VED

ify

ect ive e the

yment

ect or

e total

work or

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

The WBScontracteits receip

5.2 SCHE

The projeThe projehighlight

The tableGantt cha

Please pr

9/2/2013

10/1/2

9/1/

In

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

S for Phase 3ed Project Mpt and accept

EDULE AL

ect timeline ect timeline t key events

e below shouart can be us

rovide a mor

013

/2013 ‐ 11/30/2013

Projectnitiation/Planning

12/1/20

PCand

GRATERIS)

MANAG

3 of the IRISManager will

tance.

LLOCATI

is a high-levdoes not repsuch as deliv

uld provide ased to meet t

re detailed pr

1/1/2014

013 ‐ 1/10/2014

Phase 1 ‐didate Filing

2/4/20

Pre‐Primary D Candidate

Prima

PhasReportin

D REP

GEMEN

S Implementbe responsib

ION -PRO

vel view of pplace the neeverable due

a high level vthe timeline

roject schedu

4/1/2014

SecretaSO

High Level P201

014

esignatione Filing

3/11/2014

ry Candidate Filing

3/18/2014

Write‐In Candidate F

1/11/2014 ‐ 5/2/2014

e 2 ‐ Election Night ng, Electronic Canvas

4/14/2014

1st CampaigReport Due

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

tation is one ble. It will be

OJECT TI

project activied for a detaidates and w

view of the prequirement

ule as an att

4

ary of StateOS IRISProject Sched13 ‐ 2014

6/3/2014

Primary Election Day

Filing

ss

4

gn e

5/6/2014

Absentee Voting Begins

6

Filing DaMin

NG AND

AN (PM

of the earlye made avail

IMELINE

ities with a filed project s

when go/no-g

project timet.

achment to t

7/1/2014

dule

y

6/24/2014

ay Independent/nor/Write‐Ins

D INTE

MP)

y deliverablelable upon r

E

focus on projschedule and

go decisions

e line, or a su

this plan.

10/1/2014

11/

General 

10/7/201

Absentee Votin

EGRITY

PAG

s for which equest follow

oject milestond it is to are made.

ummary-leve

12

4

/4/2014

Election Day

14

g Begins

Y

GE | 38

the wing

nes.

el

2/31/2014

Gene

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

11/4/2014

1/1/20

Phas

11/4/2014

eral Election Day

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

015 4/1/2015

1/1/2015 ‐ 6/30/2

se 3 – Requirements

GRATERIS)

MANAG

7/1/2015 10/

2015

 Gathering 

D REP

GEMEN

/1/2015 1/1/201

SecretaSO

High Level P201

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

16 4/1/2016

ary of StateOS IRISProject Sched14 ‐ 2017

7/1/201

Phase 3 – VoElection 

6/7/201

Primary Elect

NG AND

AN (PM

dule

15 ‐ 4/30/2017

oter Registration & Management 

11/

General 

16

tion Day

D INTE

MP)

/4/2016

Election Day

EGRITY

PAG

6

5/1/2017 ‐ 6

Project Cl

Y

GE | 39

6/30/2017

6/30/2017

ose Out

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

5.3 PROJ

Costs estassociatecycles, orbreakdowappropriadeliverab

Phase / A

SOS UmTasks

IRIS Pha(COMPL

RequiremAssessmPhase 3

(COMPL

IV & V fPlanningImplemeand ClosPhases

PM for PImplemeand ClosPhases

Testing fPlanningImplemeand ClosPhases

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

JECT BUD

timates are thed rates or fer people. Th

wns as needeate format foble).

Activity

mbrella

ase 1 & 2 LETE)

ments ment for

LETE)

for g, entation seout

Planning, entation seout

for g, entation seout

GRATERIS)

MANAG

DGET

he costs appees. Resourcehe total cost ied. Match thor the projec

Associated

IV&V

Project Man

Testing

Security Ass

IRIS Candid

IRIS Electio

Use Cases

Functional R

Test Cases

Initial assess

Monthly sta

Election Nigrecommenda

Close out re

PMP

WBS

TARC

Project Dash

Weekly and

Testing plan

Testing over

(Testing inc

D REP

GEMEN

lied to an aces can includis critical anese cost esti

ct size and cu

Deliverables

nagement

sessment

date Filing M

on Night Repo

Requirements

sment

atus reports

ght Reportingations report

eports

hboard

d Biweekly St

n

rsight

cludes System

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ctivity in a prde equipmend should be mates with t

ustomer requ

s

odule

orting Modul

s Matrix

g Testing asse

eering Comm

m and UAT)

NG AND

AN (PM

roject by assnt, material, consistent wthe actual biuirements (e

le

essment and

mittee Meeting

D INTE

MP)

signing resoutechnology,

with the propilled amount.g., by WBS

gs

EGRITY

PAG

urces with processing

posal; includts. Use an S, milestone,

Estimated Budget

$311

$190

$155

$285

$80

Y

GE | 40

de

or

,000

0,000

5,000

5,000

0,000

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Phase / A

SoftwareDevelopPhase 3 Implemeand ClosPhases

Hosting

Security Assessmend of ImplemePhase

TOTAL

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

Activity

e ment for Planning, entation seout

Platform

ment near

entation

LS

GRATERIS)

MANAG

Associated

IRIS Voter R

IRIS Electio

Import and c

Import and c

Microsoft ACloud

Conduct sec

Conduct reavendor

D REP

GEMEN

Deliverables

Registration M

on Manageme

cleanup of Vo

cleanup of str

Azure Platform

curity assessm

assessment fol

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

s

Module

ent Module

oter data

reet file data

m as a Service

ment and prov

llowing corre

NG AND

AN (PM

e in the Gover

vide findings

ection by the s

D INTE

MP)

rnment

software’s

EGRITY

PAG

Estimated Budget

$830

$25

$25

$1,901

Y

GE | 41

0,000

5,000

5,000

,000

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

MAJOR D

Major

BPro – IRINight Repo

Security A

IV&V Pha

Requireme

BPro – IRIEnvironmebuild, initia

BPro – IRIand systemElection en

BPro – IRIProductionmanageme

Project Ma

Security A

Testing (Sy

Hosting (1

IV&V & E

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ELIVERABLE

r Project DelivM

IS Phase 1 andorting, e-Canv

ssessment Pha

ase 1&2

ents Assessmen

IS Phase 3 – Gent Configuratal data migrati

IS Phase 3 – Som testing, legacynd- to- end test

IS Phase 3 – Usn deployment, Pent, transition t

anagement Pha

ssessment Pha

ystem + UAT)

year) Phase 3

Election Night R

GRATERIS)

MANAG

SCHEDULE AN

verable and PMeasure

d 2 – Candidateass

ases 1&2

nt for Phase 3

ap Analysis, Dtion, Database ion, QA plan, T

oftware customy data converst

ser training, ITProduction issto operations

ase 3

ase 3

Phase 3

Reporting Test

D REP

GEMEN

ND PERFORM

erformance

e Filing, Electio

Development design and Training plan

mization, UAT sion, Mock

T training, ues

ting Phase 3

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

MANCE MEASU

Bud

(in thou

on $

$

$

$

$

$

NG AND

AN (PM

URES

dget

usands) D

$311,000 6/3

$190,000 6/3

$175,000 6/3

$580,000 6/3

$75,000 6/3

$285,000 6/3

$25,000 6/3

$80,000 6/3

$25,000 6/3

$155,000 6/3

D INTE

MP)

Due Date

30/2014

30/2015

30/2016

30/2017

30/2017

30/2017

30/2017

30/2017

30/2017

30/2017

EGRITY

PAG

Project Pha

Planning, ImplementatiCloseout

Planning

Planning, Implementati

Closeout

ImplementatiCloseout

ImplementatiCloseout

Planning, ImplementatiCloseout

ImplementatiCloseout

Implementati

ImplementatiCloseout

Planning, ImplementatiCloseout

Y

GE | 42

ase

on,

on,

on,

on,

on,

on,

on

on,

on,

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

5.4 PROJ

5.4.1 PRO

Insert a gconfiguraThe OS sidentifyinprojects, managem

County Cler

IT Suppo

Elections  Su

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

JECT TEA

OJECT TEAM

graphical Orgation defininshould be simng the core pconsider usi

ment reportin

rk Taskforce

ort Staff

upport Staff

GRATERIS)

MANAG

AM

M ORGANIZA

ganization Cng levels of pmple and strproject team ing a secondng.

MandElection

D REP

GEMEN

ATIONAL ST

Chart here. Tprogram manaightforwardby shading

d OS to ident

Brad Wi Secretary oExecutive S

Mary QuintanSecretary oExecutive S

Kari FresElections Dire

Project Sp

dy Vigil, ns Bureau

Gregory RoSOS Project

Bpro Develop

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

RUCTURE

The Organizanagement and. Include rotheir respecttify core proj

nter,of StateSponsor

na, Deputy of StateSponsor

quez,ector/CIOponsor

AndreElectio

ockstroh, t Manager

pment Staff

NG AND

AN (PM

ational Strucnd may identole names antive boxes o

oject team. T

ew Roush,ons  Bureau

D INTE

MP)

cture (OS) istify all proje

nd people’s non the chart. The OS can a

EGRITY

PAG

a hierarchicect personnelnames. ConsOn complex

also be used

Burger, CarroAssociates

IV&V Contrac

CSW EnterpriPM Contract

TBDTesting Contra

Y

GE | 43

cal l. sider x for

oll sctor

sestor

ctor

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

5.4.2 PRO

List the tcomprehmembersa specific

ROLE

ExecutivSponsor

Project

SOS ProManage/Techni

Clerk L

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

OJECT TEAM

team membeensive listins involved toc role.

ve r

Sponsor

oject ement cal Lead

iaison

GRATERIS)

MANAG

M ROLES AN

ers, their roleg including

o ensure busi

RESPONSIB

Ensure appresources ais set for th

Project ovedecision mauthority

Provide promanagemeimplementoversight

SOS electiooversight eliaison to ctraining ansupport; lomanagemeformal statand commuclerk distrib

D REP

GEMEN

ND RESPONSI

e, responsibithose from tiness objecti

BILITY

propriate and priority he project.

ersight and making

oject nt and ation

ons and expertise; clerks; d user gistics nt; prepare us reports unication forbutions

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

IBILITIES

ility and functhe organizatives are met

NAME

Brad Wi

Kari Fre

Gregory

r

Mandy V

NG AND

AN (PM

ctional manation managinand the ven

inter

esquez

y Rockstroh

Vigil

D INTE

MP)

ager. Make sng the proje

ndor member

FUNCT

AREA

Secreta

Electioand CI

SOS IT

SOS E

EGRITY

PAG

sure to incluct, business rs that may h

TIONAL

A

ary of State

ons DirectorO

T Division

lections

Y

GE | 44

ude a

have

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

ROLE

Clerk FoGroup

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ocus

GRATERIS)

MANAG

RESPONSIB

Subject maAs needed support forbusiness redeterminingoals and duser accept

D REP

GEMEN

BILITY

atter experts;project

r defining equirements;ng project deliverables;tance testing

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

NAME

;

; g

*RebeccBernalill

*RomanBernalill

*Dave KChaves

*Elisa B

*Ray AnCibola

*Janice GAna

*Lorrie MAna

*WhitneLincoln

*RichardMcKinle

*Joanne Salas - M

*Vivian Trujillo

*DeannaOtero

*Denise Otero

*Kim Ch

*Robyn Otero

*Selina M

*FrancelRio Arri

*DeAunRooseve

*Tanya SJuan

*Diego RMiguel

*GeraldiSan Mig

*Louann

NG AND

AN (PM

ca Martinez -lo

n Montoya - lo

Kunko -

Bro - Cibola

nn Garcia -

Giron - Don

Munoz - Do

ey Whittaker

d Palochak -ey

E. Padilla Mora

Gurule - Mora

a Montoya -

Guerra -

havez - Oter

Holmes -

Maes - Otero

lla Montoya iba

n Searl - elt

Shelby - San

Romero - Sa

ine Gutierrezguel

na Sanchez

D INTE

MP)

FUNCT

AREA

-

na

ona

r -

-

ro

o

a -

n

an

z -

StatewClerk O

EGRITY

PAG

TIONAL

A

wide County Offices

Y

GE | 45

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

ROLE

SOS IT

SoftwarDevelopImplem

IV&V C

Project Contrac

Testing

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

Systems

re pment/

mentation

Contractor

Manager ctor

Contactor

GRATERIS)

MANAG

RESPONSIB

System arcimplementoperationalrequiremenanalysis

Developmeimplementadeliverable

IV&V projvalidation dand ElectioReporting Tassessment

Senior projmanagemeimplementoversight

Provide tesoversight amanageme

D REP

GEMEN

BILITY

chitecture, ation and l nts; business

ent & ation

es

ject deliverableson Night Testing t

ject nt and ation

sting and nt

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

NAME

s

Gregory

Brandon

Nick Beh

Lori He

TBD

NG AND

AN (PM

y Rockstroh

n Campea

hrmann

ewig

D INTE

MP)

FUNCT

AREA

SOS IT

BPro, IDevelo

BurgerAssoci

CSW E(ProjecManag

EGRITY

PAG

TIONAL

A

T Division

Inc.(Softwaropment)

r, Carroll ates (IV&V)

Enterprises ct gement)

Y

GE | 46

re

)

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

5.5 STAF

Completeproject coVendor t

5.5.1 PRO

Resource

Kari Fresq

Gregory R

Mandy Vig

BPro

IV&V

PM Contra

Testing C

5.5.2 NO

Use this

Resource

Hosting S

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

F PLANN

e the chart bommitment.eam membe

OJECT STAF

quez

Rockstroh

gil

actor

ontractor

N-PERSONN

section to lis

ervice Provide

GRATERIS)

MANAG

NING AND

below identif Project staf

ers

FF

Cost Estimate

830.0

155.0

285.0

80.0

NEL RESOURC

st services or

Cost Estimate

r 25.0

D REP

GEMEN

D RESOU

fying the proff should inc

EstimatedHours

CES

r product (H

Estimatedunits/hour

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

URCE ACQ

oject team mlude State, C

d Availability

.5

.7

.9

1.0

.1

1.0

.1

HW/SW and

d rs Availability

1

NG AND

AN (PM

QUISITIO

members and Contract, Cu

Skill Set

Management

IT Manageme

Elections

Development;solution implementatio

IV&V

Project Management

Software TestDesign and Management

such) neede

y Source

Microsoft Azure GovernmeCloud

D INTE

MP)

ON

details concustomer (Bus

Work Pro

Project D

ent Task Direprocess/imanager

Clerk liaisUAT, comcoordinat

;

on

Softwareproject ta

IV&V De

Task Direprocess

ting Testing doversight

ed for project

Work Pr

ent

Azure c

EGRITY

PAG

cerning theirsiness Owne

oduct/Deliverabl

Direction

ection/workflowinternal projectr

son; SME; trainmmunication antion

e implementatioasks

liverables

ection/workflow

design and t

t

roduct/Deliverab

loud services P

Y

GE | 47

r er), or

le

w t

ning; nd

on

w

ble

PAAS

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

5.6 PROJ

Logisticsvendor reresources

The Clerthe count

U

T

S

F

5.6.1 PR

Describeusers, sysdocumen

Resource

None iden

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

JECT LOG

s describes hesources wils. Training s

rk Liaison wity focus grou

User Accepta

Training

cheduling fo

ormal Projec

ROJECT TEAM

training if astem admini

nt or part of t

ntified at this tim

GRATERIS)

MANAG

GISTICS

how the projell physically specifically r

ill manage loups, and the

ance Testing

ocus group m

ct Status Co

M TRAINING

any needed bistrators or bthe transition

Cost Estimate

me

D REP

GEMEN

ect managerwork togeth

related to pro

ogistical taskstatewide co

meetings

mmunicatio

G

by project teabusiness ownn to operatio

EstimatedHours

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

, project teamher. Include aoject team m

ks and coordounty clerk o

n with Coun

am membersners; those shons planning

d Availability

NG AND

AN (PM

m, the businanything to

members sho

dination betwoffices. Log

nty Clerk Of

s. This is nohould be han

g.

y Skill Set

D INTE

MP)

ness owner/cdo with movuld be inclu

ween the coristical tasks

ffices

ot to include ndled within

Work Prod

EGRITY

PAG

ustomer andving or startided here.

re project teawill include

training for n a training

duct/Deliverable

Y

GE | 48

d any ing

am, e:

end

e

6

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

6.0 PROJ

6.1 RISK

PMBOK

Risk: “Aproject’s

Issue: “Aunder dis

Both Risksimilar w

6.1.1 RIS

The risk mitigatioand the rregular re

6.1.2 ISS

Issues are

6.2 INDEP

Independdeterminproducts stage, boorganizat

For Phasinclude oacceptan

Update N

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

JECT MA

AND ISSU

K©:

n uncertain eobjectives.”

A point or mascussion or o

ks and Issueways.

SK MANAGE

assessment con strategy. Tisks will be eporting by t

SUE MANA

e tracked on

PENDEN

dent Verificane complianc

of a given dth of which tion. Describ

es 1 and 2, Aoversight of dce testing be

November 20

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ANAGEM

UE MANA

event or con”

atter in questover which th

s can signifi

MENT STRA

conducted atThese actionmanaged anthe Project M

AGEMENT

n project dash

T VERIFI

ation and Vace with specidevelopmentare performbe the proces

An IV&V wdeliverableseing complet

015:

D REP

GEMEN

MENT A

AGEMEN

ndition that, i

tion or dispuhere are opp

icant impact

TEGY

t the start ofns were consind assessed rManager dur

hboard and d

ICATION

alidation (IVified requiremt phase fulfiled by an orgss that will b

as awarded t relating primted.

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

AND CON

NT

if it occurs, h

ute, or a poinposing views

t a project’s

f the project idered whenegularly throring status m

discussed at

N AND VA

&V) means ments and thll the requireganization inbe employed

to Pods, Inc.marily to req

NG AND

AN (PM

NTROLS

has a positiv

nt or matter ts or disagree

success, and

includes iden building theoughout the

meetings.

weekly proj

ALIDATIO

the process he process oements estabndependent od to meet IV&

., Contract #quirements b

D INTE

MP)

S

ve or negativ

that is not seements.”

d both shoul

entified riskse project maproject life

ject status m

ON - IV&V

of evaluatinof determininblished durinof the develo&V requirem

# 10-000-00-being met an

EGRITY

PAG

ve effect on a

ettled and is

ld be handled

s and the anagement pcycle includ

meetings.

V

ng a system tng whether thng the previoopment ments.

-00043A, to nd user

Y

GE | 49

a

d in

lan ding

to he

ous

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

For Phas19173, inservices tmeet projmitigated

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

e 3, an IV&Vn August 201to ensure project requiremd when possi

GRATERIS)

MANAG

V contract w15 and will boject managments, user aible.

D REP

GEMEN

was awardedbe in place fement practiacceptance te

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

d to Burger, Cfor the duratiices are sounesting is wel

NG AND

AN (PM

Carroll and Aion of the prnd, softwarell run and pr

D INTE

MP)

Associates, Croject. IV&V implementa

roject risks a

EGRITY

PAG

Contract # V will providation deliverare identified

Y

GE | 50

de rables d and

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

6.3 SCOP

The follo

A Projecdescribe project. The PCR

6.3.1 Cha

6

To ensurmaintainbaseline

A PCR clog and trpotential availabili

The steps

1. A2. T

S3. T

d4. T

te5. If

Sre

6. Ifre

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

PE MANA

owing proces

t Change Rethe change,

R must be app

ange Contro

6.3.1.1 Cha

re timely anded. A changrequirement

an be initiatracked by thchanges mu

ity.

s of the chan

A Project teamThis team me

ponsor. The Project M

etermine criThe change iseam memberf the change ponsor and Bepository forf the change eflect this de

GRATERIS)

MANAG

AGEMENT

ss will be fol

equest (PCRthe rationale

proved by th

l

ange Cont

d effective dee refers to ants established

ed by anyonhe Project Must be analyz

nge control p

m member iember prepar

Manager worticality as ws added to thrs. is approved

BPro and prr tracking. is deferred o

ecision.

D REP

GEMEN

T PLAN

llowed if a c

) will be thee for the cha

he Project Sp

rol Proces

elivery of thny modificatd during the

ne on the projManager, and

zed for impa

process inclu

dentifies a fures a PCR an

rks with the well as impache weekly sta

d by the Projeovided to th

or rejected, t

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

change to the

vehicle for ange and the

ponsor and B

ss

he project, a ftion or new design porti

oject team, mmust be appct on schedu

ude:

function not and forwards

Project Sponct on cost, scatus project

ect Sponsor,e Project Ma

the Project M

NG AND

AN (PM

e SOW is req

communicateffect the ch

BPro prior to

formal chandevelopmenion of each p

must be formproved by thule, function

already idento the Proje

nsor and Dechedule, or reagenda for d

, the PCR is anager to up

Manager wil

D INTE

MP)

quired:

ating change.hange will h

o implement

ge control pnt that deviatphase of the

mally documehe Project Spnality, cost, a

ntified as a dct Manager

velopment tesources. discussion by

signed by thpdate change

ll update the

EGRITY

PAG

. The PCR mhave on the

tation.

rocess will btes from the project.

ented in a chponsor. All and resource

deliverable. and Project

team to

y all project

he Project e log and pro

change log

Y

GE | 51

must

be

hange

oject

to

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

6.4 PROJ

Costs estassociatecycles, orbreakdowappropriadeliverab

6.4.1 BUD

Delivera

Software(All Pha

IV&V (A

Project M

RequiremProject Sof Phase

Testing C

Security

Microso

Total

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

JECT BUD

timates are thed rates or fer people. Th

wns as needeate format foble).

DGET TRACK

ables

e Developmenses)

All Phases)

Management

ments AssessmSchedule (COe 2)

Contractor (P

Assessment

ft Hosting Co

GRATERIS)

MANAG

DGET MA

he costs appees. Resourcehe total cost ied. Match thor the projec

KING

nt & Impleme

(Phase 3)

ment & InitiaOMPLETED a

Phase 3)

(All Phases)

osts

D REP

GEMEN

ANAGEM

lied to an aces can includis critical anese cost esti

ct size and cu

EsBuAlPh

entation $

al at end

$

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

MENT

ctivity in a prde equipmend should be mates with t

ustomer requ

stimated udget ll hases

EsBuPh

$1,110.9

$174.9

$285.0

$190.0

$80.0

$35.2

$25.0

$1,901.0

NG AND

AN (PM

roject by assnt, material, consistent wthe actual biuirements (e

stimated udget hase 3

$830.0

$155.0

$285.0

$80.0

$25.0

$25.0

$1,400.0

D INTE

MP)

signing resoutechnology,

with the propilled amount.g., by WBS

Actual Costs Phases 1&2

$252.0(Actual)

$19.9

NA

190.0

(Actual =Budget)

NA

$10.2

NA

$472.1

EGRITY

PAG

urces with processing

posal; includts. Use an S, milestone,

Actual Costs Phase 3

0 )

9

A

0

= )

A

2

A

Y

GE | 52

de

or

Total Costs All Phases

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

BUDGET

Commemainten

ProfessioServices

Hardwar

Software

TOTA

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

T TRACKING B

nts: Items in nance and sup

Descrip

nal DesigDevel

RequiAnaly

IV&VElectioReporTestin

ProjecManag

SysteUAT TPhase

Hostin

SecuriAsses

re

e

AL

GRATERIS)

MANAG

BY FISCAL YE

chart are plapport estimat

ption

gn & opment

rements ysis

V & on Night rting ng

ct gement

em and Testing 3

ng

ity sment

D REP

GEMEN

EAR

anning and imtes provided i

FY14 & Prior

$281,000

$20,000

$10,000

$311,000

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

mplementatioin the FY18&

FY15

$190,000

$190,000

NG AND

AN (PM

on costs for F&After colum

FY16

$175,00

0

$120,00

$155,00

0 $450,00

D INTE

MP)

FY14 – FY17mn.

FY17

00 $655,0

00 $35,0

00 $130,0

$80,0

$25,0

$25,0

00 $950,0

EGRITY

PAG

7. Ongoing

FY1

(AMainte

Su

000

000

000

000

000

000

a

000 G

Y

GE | 53

18&After

Annual enance and

upport)

$25,000

(annual)

$25,000

(annual assessment)

$198,000 (annual)

Grand Total

$1,901,000

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

6.5 COMM

Communstakeholdneeds to them, andhowever the appro

6.5.1 CO

Cdprbyo

WHO

CORE PRTEAM

PROJECMANAGPROJEC

PROJECMANAGOVERSI

EXECUTSPONSOPROJEC

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

MUNICA

nication planders, executiaddress whod by whom. a high level

opriate Appe

MMUNICATI

Communicatiashboard to roject memby team memf project stat

ROJECT

CT GER & CT SPONSO

CT GER & DOITIGHT

TIVE OR & CT SPONSO

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ATION PL

nning involveive sponsorso needs whatThe comple

l summary oendix.

ION MATRIX

ion will be passign tasks

bers will be hmbers through

tus at least m

TYPE

Team M

R

Status m

T Status R

R

Status M

D REP

GEMEN

AN

es determini, project teamt informationexity of the pf that plan w

X

primarily mas and deadlinheld weekly hout the wee

monthly.

Meeting

meeting

Report

Meeting

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ing the informm and othersn, when theyproject may rwill need to b

anaged by thenes to projec

and email wek. Project S

FREQ

Weekly

Weekly

Monthl

Monthl

NG AND

AN (PM

rmation and cs as needed.y will need itrequire a sepbe included h

e project mact team memwill be used fSponsor will

UENCY

y

y

ly

ly

D INTE

MP)

communicat The commut, how it wilparate commhere and a re

anager usingmbers. Status

for regular cinform exec

PURP

Reviemake resolv

Providupdatedeliveand isexecu

ProgreDoIT

Ensursponsoprojecsupporesour

EGRITY

PAG

tion needs ofunication plall be given to

munication peference mad

g the project meetings wi

communicaticutive spons

POSE

w progress; assignments

ve issues

de progress es on erables, riskssues to

utive sponsor

ess updates tOversight

re executive or has currenct status and orts ongoing rce assignme

Y

GE | 54

f the an o lan; de to

ith ion ors

s;

s,

rs

to

nt

ents

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

FOCUS G

6.5.2 STA

Tmnrew

6.5.3 PRO

TacPMthP

6.6 PERF

The Projecontrol thcollectedusage, anforecastin(budget)

The detaischedulesetup thethe IV&Vcompletethe projeacceptan

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

GROUPS

ATUS MEETI

The core projmeet monthly

ecessary. Adequirements,

wider particip

OJECT STAT

Team membeccomplishmroject Mana

Monthly, the hat will be foroject Certif

FORMANC

ect Managerhe project. E

d for measurind error ratesng future proand quality.

iled project p, and quality

e structure foV contractoreness of eachct cost, schece of the del

GRATERIS)

MANAG

Focus gr

INGS

ect team wily for regular d hoc meetin, completingpation and in

TUS REPORT

ers will be rements, issues,ager will con

Project Manorwarded to fication Com

CE MEAS

r and ExecutEach project ing the progrs, and of estaojects. At a m

plan includey. The develoor the reviewr, involving eh deliverableedule, and quliverable.

D REP

GEMEN

roup meetin

ll hold weekmeetings an

ngs with focug user acceptnput is neces

S

esponsible fo risks, and w

nsolidate statnager (SOS CDoIT on a m

mmittee.

SUREMEN

tive Sponsorwill need to ress of a projablishing a hminimum m

es milestonesopment team

ws. Each mileend users ane. Once the duality metric

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ngs As nee

kly meetingsnd will be cous groups witance testingssary.

or preparing work plans fotus and a proCIO) will prmonthly basi

NT (PROJ

r define the phave an esta

oject against historical dat

metrics must b

s\deliverablem lead will idestone will b

nd focus groudeliverable hcs, the Projec

NG AND

AN (PM

ded

. The Execuonvened on aill be held, a

g, or for othe

a weekly staor the prior aoject status wrepare the Dois and will pr

JECT & Q

project metriablished metits planned btabase, whicbe establishe

es that confodentify delivbe evaluated ups as needehas been revict Sponsor w

D INTE

MP)

dedica

DefineFormaprojecaccept

utive Steeringa more frequas needed, foer project del

atus report toand upcominwill be compoIT Monthlyresent, as ne

QUALITY

ics that will trics programbudget, sche

ch will aid ined for time (

orm to a certaverable revie

by the core ed, to ensure iewed and ev

will perform

EGRITY

PAG

ated to proje

e project goaal reports onct progress, utance testing

g Committeeuent basis, asor defining liverables wh

o communicng week. Thpleted each wy Status Repeeded, to Do

Y METRIC

be used to m. Metrics aedule, resourn planning an(schedule), c

ain cost, ew points and

project teamquality and

valuated agasign off and

Y

GE | 55

ect

als; n user g

e will s

here

cate e

week. port IT’s

CS)

are rce nd cost

d m and

ainst d

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

6.7 QUAL

Quality Mneeds forthat deterimprovemsummary

6.7.1 QUA

Describeand assesobjective

Identify eperformatool or m

NUMBE

QUALITY

QUALITY

QUALITY

QUALITY

QUALITY

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

LITY OBJ

Managementr which it warmine the qument, withiny in this docu

ALITY STAN

the agency,ssed by the pes were achie

each of the pance of the a

measure such

ER

Y METRICS

Y METRICS

Y METRICS

Y METRICS

Y METRICS

GRATERIS)

MANAG

JECTIVE

t includes thas undertakeuality policy,n the quality ument and re

DARDS

, industry or project. Theseved.

project qualictual produc as number o

DESCR

1 Ability includinLive, an

2 Regularduration

3 Project and pladecision

4 Project

5 Measurfeedbac

D REP

GEMEN

S AND CO

he processes en. It include, objectives, system. If a efer to the ap

regulatory pse quality sta

ty standardsct and/or servof project re

RIPTION

to export anng tabulationnd election nr executive sn of the proj

o Requo Risko Finao Chano Deli

developmen

ans must cleans made durstays on tim

re enhanced ck received i

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ONTROL

required to ees all activiti

quality assuseparate Qu

ppropriate ap

project perfoandards will

s that are direvice. For eacviews or Pro

nd import dan software, bnight reportisteering comject to facilituirements m

k managemeancial oversinge\Issue miverables acc

nt methodoloarly reflect thring this proj

me, on scope

service delivin regards to

NG AND

AN (PM

L

ensure that ties of the oveurance, qualiuality Plan isppendix.

ormance stan be used to a

ectly relatedch quality stoject Status.

ata seamlesslballot printining.

mmittee meettate:

managementnt

ight management

ceptance

ogy must behe project deject. , and within

very and useo the project.

D INTE

MP)

the project werall manageity control, as used, inclu

ndards that wassess wheth

d to the projetandard, iden

ly across votng systems, D

tings must b

e followed – eliverables, t

n budget.

er satisfactio.

EGRITY

PAG

will satisfy thement functiand quality de a high lev

will be followher the qualit

ect and not tontify the trac

ting systemsDemocracy

be held for th

all documentasks, and

on via positiv

Y

GE | 56

he ion

vel

wed ty

o the cking

s

he

nts

ve

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

6.7.2 PRO

R

R

P

M

T

6.7.3 AG

The Projethey feel would bemembers

Example

Areas of

Agency a

Quality o

Manages

Productiv

6.7.4 PR

How the services avendor dproduct.

Ton

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

OJECT AND P

Review Type

Requirements

Plans

Milestones

Testing

ENCY/CUST

ect Managerthe project i

e helpful to ts.

s:

f feedback

awareness

of communic

s project task

ve Meetings

RODUCT DE

client takes agreements;

developed co

The project mnce the cont

GRATERIS)

MANAG

PRODUCT R

Quality Stan

OMER SATIS

r should asseis going, andthe success o

cations

ks

ELIVERAB

procession oconfiguratiode; test case

manager willtract has been

D REP

GEMEN

REVIEW AND

ndard Tools

SFACTION

ess the on-god how team mof the project

When

Status meet

Status meet

Status meet

Status meet

BLE ACCEP

of the produon settings; ses, routines, a

update this n awarded to

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

D ASSESSM

s

oing sense ofmembers aret and the pro

tings

tings

tings

tings

PTANCE PR

uct. Delivery status of patand scripts;

document too the solutio

NG AND

AN (PM

MENTS

Reviewer

f the projecte acting on tofessional gr

H

W

W

W

W

ROCESS

of media; mtches to COTand other ite

o identify pron provider.

D INTE

MP)

R

t stakeholderthe project. Trowth of the

How Often

Weekly

Weekly

Weekly

Weekly

manuals; conTS products;ems required

rocess of pro

EGRITY

PAG

Reports

rs about howThis feedbacproject team

ntracts; licen; in-house ord to operate t

oduct deliver

Y

GE | 57

w ck m

ses; r the

ry

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

D

6.8 CONF

Configurdocumenetc.) and awarenes

TalTcoPP

6.8.1 VER

Pcoar

6.8.2 PRO

“Provide tbut not limstrategies lead agencreview” P

Aal

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

Deliverable

FIGURAT

ration Managnts, etc.) will

owned by (ess are critica

The Project Mll critical do

Team membeontrolled byroject Teamroject Mana

RSION CONT

roject documonvention anre maintaine

OJECT REPO

to the Departmmited to the pand plan, percy must make

PROJECT OV

A shared projll project do

GRATERIS)

MANAG

TION MAN

gement deterl be managede.g., Agency

al.

Manager willcuments are

ers can read the Project

m Members mager for appr

TROL

ments are nand the versioed in the proj

OSITORY (PR

ment all projeproject plan, priodic project e available all

VERSIGHT P

ject repositocumentation

D REP

GEMEN

Final Ap

NAGEME

rmines how d (tracked, ay managing t

l be responsi tracked anddocuments iManager to

must use tracropriate acce

amed with thon control paject reposito

ROJECT LIBR

ect managemproject schedu

reports, requl deliverables

PROCESS Me

ry has beenn is stored.

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

pproval Process

ENT

project inforapproved, stothe project o

ible for settind maintainedin the repositensure versi

ck changes aneptance, filin

he version nuage is updateory.

RARY)

ent and produule, initial anduirements ands in a repositoemorandum.

setup and m

NG AND

AN (PM

s C

rmation (fileored, securedor the Custom

ng up a projd for use by ttory but chaioning and mnd send chan

ng, and versio

umber identied on all pro

uct deliverabld periodic risk

d design documory with open

maintained by

D INTE

MP)

Customer Acce

es, reports, dd, accessed, mer). Standa

ect repositorthe core projanges and upmaster files anged documon control.

fied in the noject docume

les. Deliverabk assessmentsments for entaccess for th

y the Project

EGRITY

PAG

eptance Criteria

designs, memversion cont

ards and team

ry and ensurject team. Pr

pdates are are not altere

ments to the

naming ents. All vers

bles shall inclus, quality tire project. The Department

t Manager w

Y

GE | 58

mos, trol,

m

ring roject

ed.

sions

ude

he t to

where

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

6.9 PROCProjects oservices fshould besolicitatioshould al

Spr

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

CUREMENoften have sfrom outsidee included hon planning,ll be include

tandard Statrofessional s

GRATERIS)

MANAG

NT MANAome elemene the organizere. Activiti, evaluation d.

te of New Mservice contr

D REP

GEMEN

AGEMENnt of procurezation. The pes such as a and selectio

Mexico procuracts require

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

NT PLANment, i.e. th

procedures tomake-or-bun; inspection

urement guided for this pr

NG AND

AN (PM

e requiremeno be used to

uy analysis; wn and accept

delines will broject.

D INTE

MP)

nt to purchahandle thes

writing requtance; contra

be followed f

EGRITY

PAG

ase goods ande procureme

uirements; act closeout

for all

Y

GE | 59

d/or ents

7

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

7. 0 PROJ

Project Cproject acmandatorthe Agenthe last hContractuformal ac

7.1 ADMI

Administverificatiactivitiesaccordanclosing isare continproject’s project’s

Items tha A D D

ac B

ar L

an

7.2 CONT

Contract verificati

In additioContract

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

JECT CL

Close will alwctivities andry step in the

ncy/Unit thathours againstual activitiescceptance of

INISTRATIVE

trative Closeion that objes are adminisnce with the Ws too great anngent on theproject manobjectives.

at required adAll deliverablDeliverables Deliverable Acceptance fo

Baseline Verirchives upda

Lessons Learnd incorpora

TRACT CLOS

close is simion for contr

on to the AdClosure:

GRATERIS)

MANAG

LOSE

ways consistd an external e project lifet is responsibt the project,s meet the cof the project

E CLOSE

e occurs at bctives and dstratively cloWBS and shnd audits ina

e project’s conagement co

dministrativles as specifmust be acce

Acceptance Form, must beification – Pated with therned – Lessoated into futu

SE

milar to adminract close.

dministrative

D REP

GEMEN

t of administvendor is em

e cycle. Admble for mana, and providiontractual nework produc

both the end odeliverables wosed out. Adhould not be accurate. Thomplexity annsultant to t

e close: fied in this doepted by SOForm – for ee signed and roject delive

e current artins learned seure project p

nistrative clo

e Closure, the

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

trative projecmployed. Co

ministrative aaging the proing transitioneeds, such ascts.

of phase andwere met. A

dministrativedelayed to p

he specific prnd size. Projailored Proje

ocument muOS, in writing

very formal filed in the

erables shoulifacts. essions shou

plans, proced

ose in that it

e following

NG AND

AN (PM

ct activities ompleting boactivities comoject, such asn for the stafs executing a

d end of projAcceptance ise closure occproject end.roject close aect managerect Close pro

ust be complg. deliverable Project Repold be invento

uld be condudure, and art

involves pro

actions shou

D INTE

MP)

and possiblyoth sets of acmplete the ins lessons leaff to other asa procureme

ject. This clos formalized curs on a “byAt that poinactivities forrs should woocedures to

leted and acc

in the phaseository. oried and th

ucted after thifacts.

oduct and pr

uld be taken

EGRITY

PAG

y contractuactivities is a nternal needsarned, recordssignments.ent audit and

osure consistand phase

y-phase” basnt, the burdenr a given proork with the compliment

cepted.

e, deliverable

e project

he phase/ pro

rocess

to complete

Y

GE | 60

al

s for ding

d

ts of

sis in n of oject

t the

e

oject

e

A

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

PAb

Cdd

FclF

ATTACH

AttachmeProject P

A

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

rocurement Agreement T

oth parties. Contract File

ocumentatioocumentatioormal Acceplosure shoulile.

HMENTS

ents are incluPlan for appr

Appendix A -

GRATERIS)

MANAG

Audit – Theerms and Co

Creation – Aon should be on. ptance and Cd be submitt

S

uded for addrovals and ch

- Acronyms,

D REP

GEMEN

e Project Maonditions to

A contract fibaselined an

Close – A doted by the ve

ditional inforhange manag

abbreviatio

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

anager and Prensure all ite

ile, archivingnd archived,

ocument thatendor, accep

rmation, butgement purp

ons and defin

NG AND

AN (PM

roject Sponsems met req

g all project , including in

t accepts thepted by SOS

t are not formposes. Examp

nitions

D INTE

MP)

sor should requirements ag

and contracnvoices, cos

contract comand filed in

mally considples

EGRITY

PAG

eview the vegreed upon b

ctual sts, and proje

mpletion andthe Contrac

dered part of

Y

GE | 61

endor by

ect

d ct

f the

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

ACRON

OCIO IPP PMI

PMBOKPMC PMO PMP QM WBS

DEFIN

Acceptan

The criteor other a

Acceptan

Formal teand to en

Assumpt

PlanningAssumptformal ri

Baseline

A specifias the baprocedur

Commit

A pact th

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

NYMS AN

OfficeIntegrProjec

K ProjecPrograPrograProjecQualitWork

ITIONS

nce Criteria

eria that a sysauthorized e

nce Testing

esting condunable the cus

tions

g factors thattions generalsks.

e

ication or prosis for furthe

res. [IEEE-S

ment

hat is freely a

GRATERIS)

MANAG

APP

ND ABBRE

e of the Chierated Projectct Managemct Managemam Managemam Managemct Managemty ManagemBreakdown

a

stem or comntity. [IEEE

ucted to detestomer to det

, for planninlly involve a

oduct that haer developmTD-610]

assumed, vis

D REP

GEMEN

PENDIX

EVIATION

ef Informatiot Plan

ment Institutement Body of

ment Consulment Office

ment Plan ment n Structure

mponent mustE-STD-610]

ermine whethtermine whe

ng purposes, a degree of ri

as been formment, and that

sible, and ex

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

A — DEF

NS on Officer

. f Knowledgeltant

t satisfy in o

her or not a sether or not t

will be consisk. They ma

mally reviewt can be chan

xpected to be

NG AND

AN (PM

FINITION

e

order to be ac

system satisfto accept the

sidered true,ay be docum

wed and agreenged only th

e kept by all

D INTE

MP)

NS

ccepted by a

fies its accepe system. [IE

, real, or certmented here,

ed upon thathrough forma

parties.

EGRITY

PAG

a user, custom

ptance criterEE-STD-610

tain. or converted

t thereafter sal change co

Y

GE | 62

mer,

ria ]

d to

erves ontrol

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Configur

A discipldocumenthose chacomplian

Configur

The tools

Constrai

Factors thgenerally

Continge

The deveproject su

Crashing

Taking ahow to g

Critical

The seriedefined alongest p

Depende

Dependeusually resometimeencompamandator

Depende

Dependehard logi

Depende

A produca second

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ration Man

line applyingnt the functioaracteristics,nce with spec

ration Man

s and proced

ints

hat will (or dy be consider

ency Planni

elopment of uccess if spe

g

ction to decret the maxim

Path

es of activitieas those activpath through

encies, Discr

ncies defineevolve arounes referred to

ass particularry in the proj

encies, Man

ncies that aric.

ency Item

ct, action, pieindividual o

GRATERIS)

MANAG

agement (C

g technical aonal and phy record and cified requir

agement Li

dures to acce

do) limit thered constrain

ing

a managemeecified risk e

rease the totamum duratio

es that determvities with flthe project.

retionary

ed by the prond current Bo as soft logr approaches

oject life cycl

ndatory

re inherent to

ece of informor group so t

D REP

GEMEN

CM)

and administysical characreport chang

rements. [IEE

ibrary Syste

ess the conten

e project mannts.

ent plan that events occur

al duration an compressi

mines the duloat less than

oject manageBest Practices

ic, preferreds because a sle.

o the work b

mation, etc., they can perf

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

trative directteristics of age processingEE-STD-610

em

nts of the so

nagement tea

identifies al.

after analyzinion for the le

uration of then or equal to

ement team. s in a particu

d logic, or prspecific sequ

being done. I

that must beform a plann

NG AND

AN (PM

tion and surva configuratig and implem0]

oftware basel

am’s options

lternative str

ng a numbereast cost.

e project. Tho specified va

They shouldular applicatreferential louence of acti

In some case

e provided bned task.

D INTE

MP)

veillance to iion item, conmentation st

line library.

s. Contract p

rategies to b

r of alternati

he critical paalue often ze

d be used wition area. Thogic. This maivities is pref

es, they are r

by one indivi

EGRITY

PAG

identify and ntrol changetatus, and ve

provisions w

e used to en

ives to determ

ath usually ero. It is the

ith care and hey are ay also ferred, but n

referred to as

idual or grou

Y

GE | 63

s to erify

will

sure

mine

not

s

up to

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Delivera

Any meaa project

Duration

The numcomplete

Duration

Shortenincost.

End Use

The indivdeployed

Effort

The numexpressed

Fast Tra

Compressequence

Float

The amoproject fi

Formal R

A formalparties foactivities

Integrat

A plan cr

Lessons

The learnidentified

Method

A reasonperformin

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

able

asurable, tangor part of a

n

mber of work e an activity

n Compress

ng the projec

er

vidual or grod in its enviro

mber of labor d as staff ho

acking

ssing the proje, such as de

unt of time tinished date.

Review

l meeting at or comment s and of the p

ed Project P

reated by the

Learned

ning gained fd at any poin

nably compleng a task and

GRATERIS)

MANAG

gible, verifiaproject that

periods (notor other proj

sion

ct schedule w

oup who willonment.

units requirurs, staff day

ject schedulsign and con

that an activ.

which a proand approvaprogress of t

Plan

e project man

from the pront during the

ete set of ruled arriving at

D REP

GEMEN

able outcomis subject to

t including hject element

without redu

l use the sys

red to compleys, or staff w

e by overlapnstruction.

ity may be d

duct is preseal. It can alsothe project.

nager reflect

ocess of perfe execution o

es and critert a desired re

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

e, result, or io approval by

holidays or ot.

ucing the pro

stem for its in

ete an activiweeks.

pping activiti

delayed from

ented to the eo be a review

ting all appr

forming the pof the project

ria that estabesult.

NG AND

AN (PM

item that muy the project

other nonwor

oject scope. O

ntended ope

ity or other p

ies that wou

m its early sta

end user, cuw of the man

roved project

project. Lesst.

blish a precis

D INTE

MP)

ust be produt sponsor or

rking period

Often increa

erational use

project eleme

uld normally

art without d

ustomer, or onagement an

ts and sub-p

sons learned

se and repeat

EGRITY

PAG

ced to compcustomer.

ds) required t

ases the proje

when it is

ent. Usually

be done in

delaying the

other interestd technical

projects.

d may be

table way of

Y

GE | 64

plete

to

ect

y

ted

f

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Methodo

A collectengineeri

Mileston

A scheduprogress.

Non-tech

Agreemeactivities

Perform

Collectinmeasurem

Procurem

Determin

Product

The featu

Project L

The leadetechnical

Project M

The applproject redevelopm

Program

A group ongoing

Program

An organprojects.

Project M

The role controls, responsib

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

ology

tion of methoing approach

ne

uled event fo.

hnical Requ

ents, conditios of an archit

mance Repor

ng and dissemment, and fo

ment Plann

ning what to

Scope

ures and func

Leader (Tec

er of a technl direction to

Managemen

ication of knequirementsment and del

m

of related prwork.

m Managem

nizational enAs a specifi

Manager

with total buadministers

ble to the cu

GRATERIS)

MANAG

ods, proceduhes to the de

or which som

uirements

ons, and/or ctectural and

rting

minating perorecasting.

ning

procure and

ctions that c

chnical)

nical team foo the staff wo

nt

nowledge, sk. Project Malivery of the

rojects mana

ment Office

ntity responsiic reference

usiness respo, and regulatstomer.

D REP

GEMEN

ures, and stanevelopment o

me individua

contractual tesoftware pro

rformance in

d when.

haracterize a

or a specific torking on th

kills, tools, aanagement isarchitecture

aged in a coo

ible for manin this docum

onsibility fortes a project

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

ndards that dof a product.

al is accounta

erms that affoject.

nformation. T

a product or

task, who hae task.

and techniqus also respone and softwar

ordinated wa

nagement andment, the Of

r an entire pt. The projec

NG AND

AN (PM

defines an in.

able and that

ffect and dete

This include

service.

as technical r

ues to projectnsible for there project.

ay. Programs

d oversight office of the C

project. The ict manager is

D INTE

MP)

ntegrated syn

t is used to m

ermine the m

es status repo

responsibilit

t activities toe oversight o

s include an

of the organiChief Inform

individual ws the individ

EGRITY

PAG

nthesis of

measure

management

orting

ty and provid

o meet the of the

element of

ization’s mation Office

who directs, dual ultimate

Y

GE | 65

des

er.

ly

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Project C

A documprovides activities

Project M

A formalprimary ucommunbaselines

Project S

A tool usactivitiesMicrosof

Project S

The work

Project S

The indivwill playcritical o

Quality

The degr

The degrexpectati

Quality M

The procstandards

Risk

Possibilit

Risk Ma

An approgive a moidentifica

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

Charter

ment issued bthe project m

s.

Managemen

l, approved duses of the pication amons. The Projec

Schedule

sed to indicas and for meeft Project are

Scope

k that must b

Sponsor

vidual that p a key role inrganizationa

ree to which

ree to which ions. [IEEE-

Managemen

cess of monits and identif

ty of sufferin

anagement

oach to problore accurateation, analys

GRATERIS)

MANAG

by senior mamanager wit

nt Plan

document usproject plan ang stakeholdct Managem

ate the planneeting milestoe tools used t

be done to de

provides the pn securing fual issues, and

a system, co

a system, coSTD-610]

nt

toring speciffying ways to

ng loss.

lem analysis understandi

sis, prioritiza

D REP

GEMEN

anagement thth the author

sed to guide are to documders, and docent Plan (PM

ed dates, depones. Softwato develop p

eliver a prod

primary sponunding, negod approving

omponent, o

omponent, o

fic project reo eliminate c

s, which weiing of, the riation, and co

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

hat formally rity to apply

both projectment plannincuments appMP) is a proj

pendencies, are products project sched

duct with the

nsorship forotiating for rkey project

r process me

r process me

esults to detecauses of pro

ghs risk in aisks involvedontrol.

NG AND

AN (PM

authorizes thorganization

t execution ang assumptioproved scopeject plan.

and assignedsuch as AB

dules.

e specified fe

r an approvedresources, fadeliverables

eets specifie

eets custome

ermine id theoduct non-co

a situation byd. Risk Man

D INTE

MP)

he existencenal resource

and project cons and decise, cost, and s

d resources fT’s Workbe

eatures and f

d project. Thacilitating res.

ed requireme

er or user ne

ey comply wompliance.

y using risk pagement inc

EGRITY

PAG

e of a projects to project

control. The sions, facilitschedule

for performiench and

functions.

his individuasolution of

ents.

eeds or

with relevant

probabilitiescludes risk

Y

GE | 66

t. It

ate

ing

al

t

s to

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Risk Ma

The colleproject.

Risk Ma

Risk mitithreshold

Scope Ch

Any chanproject co

Software

The periois no longrequiremphase, op

Stakehol

Individuapositivelyalso exer

Standard

Mandatosoftware

Statemen

A descrip

System R

A conditicondition

Subproj

A smalle

Task

A sequen

A well-dcheckpoicompleti

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

anagement P

ection of pla

anagement

igation seeksd.

hange

nge to the prost or schedu

e Life Cycle

od of time thger available

ments phase, dperation and

lder

als and organy or negativert influence o

d

ry requiremedevelopmen

nt of Work

ption of all th

Requiremen

ion or capabn or capabilit

ect

er portion of

nce of instruc

defined unit oint into the son criteria (p

GRATERIS)

MANAG

Plan

ns that descr

s to reduce t

roject scope.ule.

e

hat begins whe for use. Thdesign phasemaintenanc

nizations thaely affected over the proj

ents employnt

he work requ

nts

bility that muty needed by

the overall p

ctions treate

of work in thtatus of the ppost conditio

D REP

GEMEN

ribes the Ris

the probabili

A scope ch

hen a softwahe Software Le, implemen

ce phase, and

at are activelas a result o

ject and its r

yed and enfor

uired compl

ust be met ory a user to so

project.

ed as a basic

he software pproject. Taskons). (see act

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

sk Managem

ity and/ or im

ange almost

are product iLife Cycle ty

ntation phased, sometimes

ly involved iof project exeesults.

rced to presc

eting a proje

r possessed bolve a proble

unit of work

process that ks have readtivity for con

NG AND

AN (PM

ment activitie

mpact of a ri

t always requ

is conceivedypically incl

e, test phase,s, retirement

in the projececution or pr

cribe a discip

ect, which is

by a system em. [IEEE-S

k. [IEEE-ST

provides madiness criterintrast.)

D INTE

MP)

es to be perfo

sk to below

uires an adju

d and ends wludes a conc installationt phase.

ct, or whose roject compl

plined unifo

s provided by

component STD-610]

TD-610]

anagement wia (precondit

EGRITY

PAG

ormed on a

an acceptab

ustment to th

when the softwcept phase, , and checko

interests maletion. They

rm approach

y the custom

to satisfy a

with a visibletions) and

Y

GE | 67

le

he

ware

out

ay be may

h to

mer.

e

SOS

SYST

PROJ

REVISION

Team

A collectdefined fof the tea

Technica

Those reqExamplerequirem

Traceab

The degrdevelopmrelationsh

Work Br

A deliverscope of project w

INTEGTEM (IR

JECT M

N 2.0

tion of peoplfunction for aam and have

al Requirem

quirements ts of technica

ments.

ility

ree to which ment procesship to one an

reakdown S

rable-orientethe project.

work.

GRATERIS)

MANAG

le, often drawan organizat other prima

ments

that describeal requireme

a relationshs, especially nother. [IEE

Structure

ed grouping Each descen

D REP

GEMEN

wn from divtion or a projary responsib

e what the soents include f

ip can be estproducts havE-STD-610]

of project elnding level r

ORTIN

NT PLA

2/1/2016

verse but relaject. Team mbilities.

oftware mustfunctional, p

tablished betving a prede]

lements that represents an

NG AND

AN (PM

ated groups, members ma

t do and its operformance

tween two oecessor-succ

organizes ann increasingl

D INTE

MP)

assigned to ay be part-tim

operational ce, interface, a

or more prodessor or mas

and defines thly detailed d

EGRITY

PAG

perform a wme participan

constraints. and quality

ducts of the ster-subordin

he total workdefinition of t

Y

GE | 68

well-nts

nate

k the