Gandhiagargswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2011-2012/Gandhinagar/GAN...Detailed Project Report (Year 2011 - 12) District Watershed Development Unit Gandhiagar IWMP - 9 ( Dabhoda ) 1.1

Detailed Project Report (Year 2011-12)

District Watershed Development UnitGandhiagar

IWMP-9 (Dabhoda)

1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5

Table no.1: Basic project information ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed ............................................................................................................................................ 7

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area ....................................................................................................................................... 9

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area .......................................................................................................................................... 10

Table no. 6: PIA ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15

Table no. 8: Land use pattern ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 18

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition ................................................................................................................................................................................ 18

11. Edaphic Factors ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ......................................................................................................................................................... 19

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................................. 20

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 20

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 21

Table no. 15: Agriculture ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21

Table no. 16: Irrigation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 22

Table no. 17: Crop details (In Kgs) .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 22

Table no. 19: Drinking water ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources .............................................................................................................................................................. 23

Table no. 21: Demographic information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no. 23: Migration details<.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 25

Table no. 24: Poverty ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 26

Table No 27: Income: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Table No: 29: Work Force Details ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ............................................................................................................................... 33

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details ............................................................................................................................................................................. 35

Table no. 32: SHG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Table no. 33: UG detail ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................................................ 40

............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: ................................................................................................................................................................................ 43

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ..................................................................................................... 43

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .............................................................. 45

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ................................................................................................................................................................................ 72

CHAPTER – 1

PROJECT BACKGROUND

1.1 Project Background

Dabhoda (IWMP-9) project is located in Gandhinagar Taluka, Gandhinagar District of Gujarat state. The project consists of two

micro watersheds with 5F2C5c2 and 5F2C5c1 as their respective codes. The total project area of the watershed is about 6884.7 Ha, of

which 5597.105 Ha is proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).

The nearest town is Gandhinagar which is about 10 Km from project area and well connected by Pucca road. The

Dabhoda Project consists of five villages the detail information of all villages is mentioned in this report. Patel, Chaudhari, Thakore,

Darbar, etc communities are the primary inhabitants of the projects. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on agriculture,

animal husbandry for rearing cattle and labor work.

Table no.1: Basic project information

S. No..

Name of the

project

Villages Gram

Panchayats Taluka District

Area of the

project

Area proposed

to be treated

Total project

cost PIA

Name Census code

1

IWMP-9 Dabhoda Project

Dabhoda 060030048770000 Dabhoda

Gandhinagar Gandhinagar

2307.40 1907.14 228.857

DWDU Gandhinagar

2 Vadodra 060030048760000 Vadodra 1275.00 733.015 87.9618

3 Magodi 060030048750000 Magodi 1355.90 1144.72 137.366

4 Valad 060030048930000 Valad 1594.40 1463.3 175.596

5 Limdiya 060030049010000 Limbadiya 352.00 348.93 41.8716

Total 6884.7 5597.105 671.652

PRIORITY MAP

DABHODACLUSTER

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty index, Percentage of SC/ST,

Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking

water situation in the area, Percentage of degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has

already been developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters, a composite ranking

has been given to Watershed project as given in table no.3.

All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 73.5 to the watershed.

Table no.2: Weight-age of the project

Project name

Project type

Weight age

i ii Iii iv v Vi vii viii ix x xi xii Xiii TOTAL

IWMP 9 Others 7.5 3 0 5 3 0 5 5 10 10 10 15 0 73.5

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed Parameters include components related to Natural Resources and Socio Economic conditions

S. No Criteria Maximum

score Ranges & Scores

1 Poverty Index 10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50% (7.5) 50 to 20% (5) Below 20% (2.5)

2 % of SC/ST population 10 >40% (10) 20 to 40% (5) <20% (3)

3 Actual Wages 5 <min wages (5) >= min wages (0)

4 % of Small Farmer &

Marginal Farmer

10 >80% (10) 50 to 80% (5) <50% (3)

5 Ground water Status 15 Over Exploited (15) Critical (10) Subcritical (5) Safe (0)

6 Moisture index 10 DDP block (10) DP Alluvial Plain (5) Non DDP or DPAP (0)

7 Assured irrigation area 15 <10% (15) 10 to 20% (10) 20 to 30% (5) >30% (reject)

8 Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village

(7.5) partially covered (5) fully covered (0)

9 Degraded land 15 >20% (15) 10 to 20% (10) <10% (5)

10

Productivity potential 10 low production & high potential (10)

moderate production & moderate potential

(5)

High production & low potential (0)

11

Contiguity to watershed 10 Contiguous to previous and

contiguity within the micro WS (10)

Contiguity within micro WS but not to

previous (5)

neither both (0)

Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

IWMP-9 Dabhoda Project 2 5F2C5c1c 5F2C5c2f -

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area S.

No. Village Name

Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency

Objectives of the programme/scheme

Year of commencement

Estimated number of beneficiaries

1 Dabhoda

MGNREGA DRDA Employment Generation 2007-08 809

SARDAR AVAS YOJNA DRDA Housing Facility 2005-06 160

INDIRA AVAS YOJNA DRDA Housing Facility 2005-06 130

T.S.C DRDA Toilet Facility 2009-12 621

MISSION MANGALAM GLPC SHG's 2010-11 1121

2 Vadodra





MISSION MANGALAM GLPC 2010-11 395

3 Magodi






4 Valad






5 Limdiya






Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area

Sl no

Project name

Year starts

Name of villages

No. Of micro

watershed

Watershed

codes

Area under

treatment

Funding

source

Nodal agenc

y PIA

Total cost

Expenditure

incurred up to start of IWMP

% financial completi

on

% physical completi

on

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CHAPTER – 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY

2.1. Project Implementing Agency:-

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs

would be responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous

organizations under State/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayat, Voluntary

Organizations (VOs). The PIA of Dabhoda Watershed project is District Watershed Development Unit, Gandhinagar.

2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit, Gandhinagar:-

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit, Gandhinagar is a district level nodal agency and was established on 6th January 2010

to oversee for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman

of the DWDU. The DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs comprising one Project Manager (deputed from Gujarat Forest

Department) and multi disciplinary team of Agriculture Expert, Civil Engineer, MIS coordinator, System Analyst, Surveyor, Computer

Operator, Accountant and Community Mobilization Expert are recruited. The DWDU, Gandhinagar office is temporarily within District

Watershed Development Unit at Balvantray Mehta Panchayat Bhavan, 2nd Floor, Near District Panchayat Office, Sector - 17. The

objectives of DWDU, Gandhinagar are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development

projects and related development activities in the district. Moreover, DWDU, Gandhinagar will work as PIA for an IWMP – 9 Dabhoda

project from the year 2011 – 12.

2.2.2 Programmers/ project running in the district:-

At present, Seven IWMP projects have been sanctioned by MORD, GOI, and New Delhi for Gandhinagar district. The entry point activities

of all the Seven IWMP projects have been identified and their work is under progress by the respective PIAs in the district. DWDU,

Gandhinagar itself works as a PIA for all the seven projects in Gandhinagar district. DWDU, Gandhinagar is also monitoring a Central

Groundwater Board central government sponsored scheme on "Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dug wells" in the district by

organizing meeting, seminar & field exposure for demonstration structure under I.E.C activities.

2.2.3 SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunities & Threats) Analysis of the DWDU

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experience staff

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency with separate office

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, North Gujarat University and NGOs for capacity

building and technical guidance

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar

(5) District level monitoring, coordination and cooperation committee

(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audits

Weakness:

(1) Insufficient funds for complete watershed projects per hectare

(2) No permanent staff

(3) No permanent office building

Opportunities:

(1) Sustainable livelihood generation by landless and asset less

(2) Improvement of socio economic status of poor

(3) Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities.

(4) Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities.

(5) Continuous learning

Threats:

(1) Lack of sustainable agriculture development

(2)Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples

(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples

Table no. 6: PIA

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP-9 Dabhoda Project

(i) Type of organization Government

(ii) Name of organization DWDU, Gandhinagar

(iii) Designation & Address Project Manager

(iv)Telephone 079 – 23247442

(v) Fax 079 – 23247442

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level

S. No

. Name

Age

Sex

Designation Qualification Experien

ce Job assigned

Monthly remunerati

on

1 Mr. P C. Pathak 55 M Project

Director B Sc. 33 Yrs. Project Management 54,483/-

2 Ms. Ankita

Singh 26 F

Technical Expert

B. Tech(ECE), PGDFM(Environme

nt) 6 Months

Monitoring & to assist in project management

25,000/-

3 Mrs.Jignaben

Bhatt 34 F

MDT-Agriculture

BRS,M.R.S 15Yrs Agriculture activity & supervision 9,000/-

4 Mr.Kalpesh R.

Chauhan 20 M WDT-Engineer Diploma Engineer 4 Months Engineering Related Works 12,000/-

5 Mrs.Rekhaben

Rathod 32 F

WDT-Community

Mobiliser M.S.W 10Yrs. SHG & Social Awareness programmes 8,000/-

6 Mr.Rahul A.

Raval 23 M

MDT-Agriculture

BRS, M.S.W. 2Yrs. Agriculture activity 8,000/-

7 Mr.Mithun A.

Kalet 24 M WDT-Surveyor I.T.I. Surveyor 4Yrs. Surveying 6,000/-

8 Mr.Sagar Bhojak 25 M WDT-

Accountant B.com 5Yrs. Accounts 7,000/-

9 Mrs.Jyotiben

Naik 36 F WDT-DEO M.A,D.E.O,CCC 6.5Yrs. Maintain Data Cell 6,250/-

CHAPTER – 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology

Dabhoda watershed project is located in Gandhinagar district about 10 kms from district headquarters. The project area is characterized by

high temperature and moderate rainfall. The project area has Sabarmati and Khari river flowing. The project area is 5597.105 ha and is being

proposed to be treated under watershed programmed. Most of the inhabitants procure drinking water through tap water of Gram Panchayat.

3.1.1 Land use pattern

The net geographical area of IWMP – 9 Dabhoda is about 6884.7 ha and has no forest cover but sporadic vegetative cover. About 84%

i.e., 5789.7 ha of land is under agricultural use out of which 100% i.e., 5789.7 ha is under rain fed area. The wasteland in the project area

is around 16.8% i.e., 934.3 ha. Mostly the crops being taken up in the project area are Cotton, Castor, Potato, Wheat and Bajara during

Kharif, Rabi and Summer season.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern

S. No.

Names of villages

Geographical Area of the village

Forest Area

Land under agricultural use

Rainfed area

Perm-anent pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-

cultivable

1 Dabhoda 2307.40

0

1968.10 1968.10 145.10 294.20 45.00

2 Vadodra 1275.00 1078.00 1078.00 145.00 172.10 24.40

3 Magodi 1355.90 1082.00 1082.00 209.00 240.70 33.20

4 Valad 1594.40 1382.00 1382.00 109.00 156.80 55.60

5 Limdiya 352.00 279.60 279.60 65.70 70.50 1.90

Total 6884.7 0 5789.70 5789.70 673.8 934.5 160.1

3.1.2 Soil and topography

Dabhoda watershed project falls under North Gujarat agro climatic zone. The soil is sandy and Golralu. It retains moisture to some

extent. Of the cultivated area, 80% of the area grows food crops among Cotton, Castor, Potato, Wheat and Bajara crops are important.

Cotton is the main non food (cash) crop. Cotton and Castor, Wheat and Potato and Bajara and Shorgum are common Kharif, Rabi and

Summer crops.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography

S. No.

Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha

Names of the villages

Major soil types Topo-

graphy a)Type

b) Area in ha

1

North Gujarat

2307.40 Dabhoda

Deep Black Medium Black To Loamy Sand

1907.14

1-3 % Slope

2 1275.00 Vadodra 733.015

3 1355.90 Magodi 1144.72

4 1594.40 Valad 1463.3

5 352.00 Limdiya 348.93

Total 6884.7 5597.105

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition

S. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Dabhoda

Nil Nil

2 Vadodra

3 Magodi

4 Valad

5 Limdiya

11. Edaphic Factors

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/

year) (mm/ year)

Water erosion

300

A Sheet 2294.81 986.77

B Rill 1791.07 770.16

C Gully 1287.33 553.55

Sub-Total 5373.22 2310.48

Wind erosion 223.88 96.27

Total 5597.11 300 2406.76

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

Dabhoda 2407

7.2 to 7.5 Inherent

Vadodra 1195

Magodi 1186

Valad 879

Limdiya 163

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

Dabhoda

Nil Nil

Vadodra

Magodi

Valad

Limdiya

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions

Name of project Average rainfall- last 5 years Average temperature

IWMP-9 800-1000 mm

Summer Winter

Max Min Max Min

45 35 22 15

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief

Project name Elevation (MSL) Slope range (%) Major streams

IWMP-9 82 1-3% Shabarmati, Khari

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture

The land of Gandhinagar district is fertile and agriculture can be taken up in the area. The ground water depth is around 150 –

200 m and runoff of the soil is not conspicuous. The temperature lies between 15-45 0C and rainfall ranges from 800-1000 mm.

The indiscriminate exploitation of land, water & vegetation has degraded and reduced the productivity. Ground water has

become the major source of drinking water as well as irrigation purpose due to its ubiquitous occurrence, easy availability & reliability.

Although chronologically it is fewer droughts prone compared to Saurashtra & Kutch regions.

The average land holding is about 0.18 ha. Migration ratio of farmers in the region is 0.8% them to ensure their livelihood without much

affecting the demographic profile of the village.

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

S. No. Village Total owned land

HHs giving land on lease HHs taking land on lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Dabhoda 697.1 1348.3 262 - - -

2 Vadodra 347 732 196 - - -

3 Magodi 269.6 928.1 159.2 - - -

4 Valad 561 897.2 136.2 - - -

5 Limdiya 213 92 47 - - -

TOTAL 2087.7 3997.6 800.4 - - -

Table no. 15: Agriculture

S. No. Village

Net sown area

One time Two times Three times

1 Dabhoda 1915 930 595

2 Vadodra 1020 528 289

3 Magodi 1030 553 298

4 Valad 1345 665 345

5 Limdiya 252 136 76

TOTAL 5562 2812 1603

Table no. 16: Irrigation

S. No. Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability months

Net area Gross area Availability

months Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area Gross area

1 Dabhoda

Nil

2 Vadodra

3 Magodi

4 Valad

5 Limdiya

Table no. 17: Crop details (In Kgs) Sl no

Village Kharif (Monsoon) Rabi (Winter) Zaid (Summer)

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Dabhoda

Castor Wheat Bajra

715 1519375 2125 553 1529045 2765 156 273000 1750

Paddy Mustard Sorghum

314 612300 1950 326 52160 2350 107 211325 1975

2 Valad

Castor Wheat Bajra

655 1535975 2345 460 1138500 2475 36 66960 1860


78 144300 1850 59 10620 2375 24 54000 2250

3 Magodi

Castor Wheat Bajra

269 638875 2375 197 520080 2640 28 58240 2080

Cotton Potato Sorghum

38 69920 1840 35 841750 24050 22 40920 1860

4 Vadodara

Castor Wheat Bajra

195 460200 2360 178 403170 2265 25 48750 1950

Cotton Potato Sorghum

25 51500 2060 42 94500 2250 16 34800 2175

5 Limbadiya

Castor Wheat Bajra

90 173250 1925 76 209000 2750 21 47250 2250


24 54600 2275 18 3240 2360 16 34320 2145

Table no. 18: Livestock

S. No. Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk

(Buffalo+Cow) Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No milk No Milk Lit/Day No Milk No No No No

1 Dabhoda 2003 6009 1057 4756.5 10765.5 131 32.75 - 86 55 9

2 Vadodra 61 183 820 3690 3873 68 17 830 39 40 7

3 Magodi 110 330 950 4275 4605 325 81.25 - 45 25 5

4 Valad 1505 4515 1595 1777.5 6292.5 410 102.5 110 100 49 8

5 Limdiya 52 156 288 1296 1452 28 7 - 12 - 2

Table no. 19: Drinking water

S. No. Village Ground water table

(mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality

1 Dabhoda 398m

Panchayat Tap Water / Bore Well 12 Months Potable

2 Vadodra 385m

3 Magodi 350m

4 Valad 389m

5 Limdiya 350m

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S. No. Names of

project

CPR Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha)

Particulars Area owned/ In possession of

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

Pvt. persons

Govt.

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify) (specify deptt.)

(specify deptt.)

1 Dabhoda project

Wasteland/ degraded land

1094.40 44.95

Pastures 4.00 1

Village Ponds/ Tanks

52.5 35.2

3.2 Socio-Economic Profile

3.2.1 Demographic Status

Dabhoda watershed project mainly covers five villages namely Dabhoda, Vadodara, Magodi, Valad and Limbadia which has total

6193 household with a net population (as per base-line survey) of 31324 with 16041 males and 15303 females. The sex ratio is about

953 females to 1000 males. There are about 137 BPL families. The average family size is of five members. The literacy rate is 59.82

percent with male literacy rate of 61.29 percent and a female literacy rate 38.71 percent.

The major castes in these villages are Patel, Chaudhari, Thakore, Darbar and others. Majority of population is involved in

agriculture and animal husbandry.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

S. No. Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Dabhoda 12400 6339 6061 555 291 264 4.48 50 29 21 0.40

2 Vadodra 5635 2886 2749 335 175 160 5.94 7 4 3 0.12

3 Magodi 4616 2389 2227 457 251 206 9.90 19 11 8 0.41

4 Valad 7508 3827 3681 155 75 80 2.06 301 156 145 4.01

5 Limdiya 1165 600 585 10 5 5 0.86 10 5 5 0.86

TOTAL 31324 16041 15303 1512 797 715 4.64 387 205 182 1.16

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

S. No. Village Literacy Literacy

% above age 14

Literacy % below

age 14 Total population

Total % Male % Female %

1 Dabhoda 7178 57.89 4517 62.93 2661 37.07 70 30 12400

2 Vadodra 3071 54.50 1928 62.78 1143 37.22 65 35 5635

3 Magodi 2691 58.30 1628 60.50 1063 39.50 77 23 4616

4 Valad 4336 57.75 2722 62.78 1614 37.22 80 20 7508

5 Limdiya 823 70.64 473 57.47 350 42.53 66 34 1165

TOTAL 18099 59.82 11268 61.29 6831 38.71 72 28 31324

Table no. 23: Migration details<

S. No. Village Total population

Migration Migration by months Main

reason for migration

Income during migration /

month Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6

months

1 Dabhoda 12400 58 51 7 30 24 6

job 6500-8000

2 Vadodra 5635 41 35 6 27 22 5

3 Magodi 4616 35 33 2 20 17 3

4 Valad 7508 53 49 4 28 23 5

5 Limdiya 1165 19 18 1 13 12 1

TOTAL 31324 206 186 20 118 98 20

Table no. 24: Poverty

S. No. Village Total Household BPL

% of BPL HH Total Land

less HH % of land

less HH 0-16 16-20 Total

1 Dabhoda 2403 272 460 732 30.36 1155 48.06

2 Vadodra 1107 29 112 141 12.74 367 33.15

3 Magodi 935 101 197 298 31.87 275 29.41

4 Valad 1511 56 246 302 19.99 589 38.98

5 Limdiya 237 71 17 88 42.51 109 45.99

Total 6193 529 1032 1561 27.494 2495 39.12

Infrastructure facilities

Dabhoda project villages are well connected to Gandhinagar headquarters with pucca roads. The villages have electricity connection. All

villages have primary school and only Dabhoda and Valad villages is having higher secondary education, which is where students of

nearby villages including the other three project village students go for the secondary education.

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

S. No

. Village

Pucca road

to the villag

e (Y/N)

Schools Colleges (Number

)

Post Office

(Distance)

Banks (Number

)

Distance from

nearest market

yard (Chiloda

)

Milk collection centre (Number

)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperative

s / CBIs (Number)

Any other institutio

n

LP

UP

HS

1 Dabhod

a Y 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 4 1 0 ITI-1

2 Vadodra Y 1 1 0 0 0 1 12 2 1 0 0

3 Magodi Y 1 1 0 0 1 0 15 1 1 0 0

4 Valad Y 1 1 1 0 1 1 13 1 1 0 0

5 Limdiya Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 1 0 0

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

S. No. Village HHs with

electricity

HHs with safety

latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with

TV set

HHs with cooking

gas

HHs with Drinking

water

HHs with freedge Land

line Mobile

2-wheeler

4-wheeler

1 Dabhoda 2411 1854 225 6018 2725 895 2353 2398 2245 1487

2 Vadodra 1107 921 103 2511 1233 455 1023 1085 1235 697

3 Magodi 935 723 89 2415 1152 365 898 909 854 437

4 Valad 1511 1246 159 3547 1948 740 1402 1489 1426 705

5 Limdiya 237 215 26 605 265 85 209 220 214 155

3.3. Livelihood pattern

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they go as daily wage

labourers at elsewhere for earning. So, the economies of these rural villages basically depend upon agriculture & animal husbandry

through dairy co-operatives. Machinery & equipments other than transport equipments, metal products parts except machinery &

equipment, non-metallic mineral products & food products are the main non agriculture economic activities adjoining to the urban areas

of the district.

Table No 27: Income:

S. No. Village Agriculture

(Lakhs) Animal Husbandry Casual labour Others Total

1 Dabhoda 321.51 302.45 41.55 35.14 700.65

2 Vadodra 102.46 85.48 14.69 9.45 212.08

3 Magodi 235.68 198.75 21.84 16.81 473.08

4 Valad 291.78 227.25 30.21 21.76 571

5 Limdiya 51.08 33.15 7.05 4.29 95.57

TOTAL 1002.51 847.08 115.34 87.45 2052.38

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

S. No. Village

Benefit type 1

Benefit type

2

Benefit type 3

Total income

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Dabhoda

Nil

2 Vadodra

3 Magodi

4 Valad

5 Limdiya

Table No: 29: Work Force Details

S. No. Village Total workforce Agriculture Animal

husbandry (AH)

Agriculture + AH

Casual labour

Services Handicraft Others

1 DABHODA 2715 1113 950 733 326 190 0 136

2 VADODARA 1251 513 438 338 150 88 0 63

3 MAGODI 1057 433 370 285 127 74 0 53

4 VALAD 1707 700 598 461 205 120 0 85

5 LIMBADIYA 268 110 94 72 32 19 0 13

TOTAL 6998 2869 2449 1889 840 490 0 350

Problems faced in Agriculture

1. Urbanization of existing land:

As Gandhinagar district is the capital of Gujarat state, the villages situated in and around the area are being urbanized. Most of the

agricultural land is being made into residential area and construction made for commercial purpose. Due to this, the agricultural

production is also decreasing.

2. Degradation of land by high use of fertilizers:

With high of chemical fertilizers, the fertile agricultural land is getting degraded and as a result it leads to soil pollution. The farmers

should be made aware of the use of bio – fertilizers instead of chemical fertilizers.

3. Traditional farming methods:

This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as

multiple cropping. They use less FYM and other input in a proper way that is why they don’t get 100% output.

4. Lack of adequate machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill etc. The old

machinery takes more time in tillage practices. So it leads to low productivity.

5. Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land

productivity. The farmers should be made aware and must be encouraged to go for good quality seeds, fertilizers and pesticides when

necessary.

6. Lack of rural credit:

Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need credit mainly for the

purchase of various inputs such as seed, fertilizers, and pesticides and for repair of implements. They use long term credit for buying

land, and for investment to improve the quality of land, buying the new implements and improving irrigation facilities.

CHAPTER – 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES

Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy is been adapted by Government of India especially in the rain fed regions of semi-arid

tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy

and less incidence of migration. The inherent low fertility of crops results in high productivity of crops which have a very low biological

efficiency.

Several studies have identified that there is a need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development.

The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation in enhancing the watershed developmental

agro – horti based, forestry based & dairy developmental activities for livelihood interventions.

4.1. Scientific Planning

1. Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The

Dabhoda Watershed Project consists of four micro- watersheds. Further Dabhoda watershed project is in continuation with other

past watershed projects. This gives an element of continuation of the programme.

2. Base line Survey (Holistic Approach)

To access the impact of any watershed development programme, a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts

a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey

has been undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Village

Panchayat Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which has been filled by visiting each

and every house-hold in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage,

SC/ST population, number of BPL household, livestock population, and Net consumption rate in the village, average milk

production of the cattle’s and various schemes running and their benefits to be accrued. Bio-physical survey has been undertaken

to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, various irrigation networks in the area,

crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, bio fertilizer, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

3. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the 44 Stake – holders

towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholders’ communities and their local and

indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for

planning, implementing, and monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. This

decrease the effort of the ground staff i.e. WDT members and involves more of villagers as implementers. Various PRA techniques

like resource mapping, social mapping, and seasonal calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the

village in general and in watershed specifically. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various

tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), introduction of

economically viable plant species, Fodders crops, various active institutions and their significance in the life of the rural farmers.

4. Use of GIS and Remote sensing for Cartographic planning

Use of various high scientific tools has been promoted extensively at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps like topographical maps,

geographical map, cadastral map, thematic maps i.e., vegetation, density, & Sr.ope maps for collecting coordinates & altitude of

ware points were created. For Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Canal, Roads, Rivers, Ground water

Status, Nurseries, Check dams, Boribund, Cross bund, Drinking water situation Sr.ope percent. These were all given proper

weightages according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency(SR.NA) taking into account various features like the

Sr.ope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land.

Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project

area. This will be used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying

various location specific for soil and water conservation structures.

c) Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique has been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and Flow

accumulation. This model overlaid over cadastral map Hel to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam

etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurring while calculating the catchment area of a check dam

precisely.

PRA – Activities

Dabhoda Vadodara

Limbadiya Valad

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No.

Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used

(A) Planning Cluster approach Yes Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute Baseline survey Yes Hydro-geological survey Yes Contour mapping Yes Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/run-off cover Yes Ridge to Valley treatment Yes Online IT connectivity between (1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes (2) DRDA and SLNA Yes (3) SLNA and DoLR Yes Availability of GIS layers 1. Cadastral map Yes 2. Village boundaries Yes 3. Drainage Yes 4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 5. Land use Yes 6. Ground water status Yes 7. Watershed boundaries Yes 8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)

Weather Station Yes

(B) Inputs 1. Bio-pesticides 2. Organic manures 3. Vermicompost Yes 4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 5. Water saving devices Yes 6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 7. Bio-fencing 8. Nutrient budgeting Yes 9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers Any other (please specify)

Institution formation in Watershed

4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village.

This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram sabha of the village selects the chairman of the

watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. The Watershed Committees were formed accordingly in the

Five villages of Isanpur project. The watershed committee has a pivotal role during various processes like the PRA and overall

planning of various points.

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

Name Designatio

n M/F

SC

ST

SF

MF

LF

Land-less

UG

SHG

GP

Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

Function/s assigned#

Dabhoda

Solanki Kanubhai Ramjibhai President M Y Y B.A.L.L.B.

Watershed Manageme

nt

Solanki pareshkumar Kalyansinh

Secretary M Y Y B.A.L.L.B.

Parmar Nikulbhai Narayanbhai Member M Y Y 10 PASS

Mir Ranjitbhai babubhai Member M Y Y 12 PASS

Parmar Nagarji Kalaji Member M Y Y 10 PASS

Patel bhaveshbhai vinodbhai Member M Y Y 12 PASS

Patel Dilipbhai vishnubhai Member M Y Y GREJUIET

Solanki pravinsinh Nathubhai Member M Y Y 12 PASS

Solanki meenaben shakraji Member F Y Y 10 PASS

Solanki kusumben bhikhaji Member F Y Y 10 PASS

Chauhan Kalpesh W.D.T M Y Dip. Civil

Valad

Parmar Maheshkumar Devajibhai

President M Y Y 10 PASS

Watershed Manageme

nt

Valand Geetaben manubhai Secretary F Y Y 12 PASS

Parmar veenaben manilal Member F Y Y 12 PASS

Rabari Kalabhai shankrabhai Member M Y Y 7 PASS

Patel bhaveshbhai vinodbhai Member M Y Y 12 PASS

Rathod Ranjitsinh Kacharsinh Member M Y Y Y 8 PASS

Parmar Maheshbhai jeevanbhai

Member M Y Y 10 PASS

Thakor Budhaji Galji Member M Y Y 5 PASS

Thakor BABUJI somaji Member M Y Y 10 PASS


Limbadiy Patel Rameshbhai kantibhai President M Y Y 10 PASS Watershed

a Patel Harsadbhai Babubhai Secretary M Y Y 10 PASS Management Patel Sakarben Ranchhodbhai Member F Y Y 7 PASS

Patel Hansaben Babulal Member F Y Y 7 PASS

Patel Rinkuben Harsadbhai Member F Y Y 8 PASS

Patel Rashikbhai Maganbhai Member M Y Y 10 PASS

Thakor Arjanji Shanaji Member M Y Y GREJUIET

Patani Gangaben Nenaji Member F Y Y 12 PASS

Thakor Reekhaben Raguji Member F Y Y 12 PASS

Parmar Madhuben Poonabhai Member F Y Y 7 PASS

Rathod Rekhaben Devjibhai W.D.T F Y MSW

Magodi

Patel Govindbhai Bababhai President M Y Y 10 PASS

Watershed Manageme

nt

Patel Kishorbhai Kantibhai Secretary M Y Y Y FYBA

Thakor Dahyaji Ramsangji Member M Y Y Y 10 PASS

Patel Palakbhai Amrutbhai Member M Y Y 10 PASS

Thakor vikramji Ramaji Member M Y Y Y 7 PASS

Patel jeeviben Poonambhai Member F Y Y Y Y 5 PASS

Patel Madhuben Chhotabhai Member F Y Y Y 5 PASS

Vaghela Hansaben Bhamarsinh Member F Y Y 10 PASS

Parmar poonajabhai Ramabhai Member M Y Y Y 5 PASS

Raval Kanabhai Laxmanbhai Member M Y Y Y 5 PASS


Vadodara

Thakor Melaji Kalaji President M Y Y S.Y B.COM

Watershed Manageme

nt

Thakor Prahaladji Amaji Secretary M Y Y Y S.Y B.A

Parmar Ajanaben Rameshbhai Member M Y Y Y 12 PASS

Pandya Jayshreeben Rakeshkumar

Member M Y Y 12 PASS

Thakor Dinaji Fataji Member F Y Y 10 PASS

Parmar Arvindbhai Muljibhai Member F Y Y 10 PASS

Rabari Ramjibhai Hartanbhai Member F Y Y 10 PASS

Thakor Rameshji somaji Member M Y Y 8 PASS

Thakor Kanuji saburji Member M Y Y GREJUIET

Thakor Arjunji Bhikhaji Member M Y Y 7 PASS

Raval Rahulkumar Arjanbhai W.D.T M Y

Table no. 32: SHG detail

S. No. Village Name

Total no.shgs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 DABHODA 2 2 3 7

(i)Landless 13 27 40 0 17 17 13 11 24

(ii) SF 20 13 33 5 12 17 14 3 17

(iii) MF 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 2 2 3 7 36 40 76 5 29 34 27 14 41

2 VALAD 3 2 2 7

(i)Landless 18 33 51 8 17 25 7 6 13

(ii) SF 17 12 29 3 0 3 5 4 9

(iii) MF 7 8 15 12 3 15 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3 2 2 7 42 53 95 23 20 43 12 10 22

3 VADODARA 3 2 0 5

(i)Landless 17 23 40 11 23 23 7 6 13

(ii) SF 12 16 28 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3 2 0 5 34 39 73 11 23 23 7 6 13

4 MAGODI 3 2 2 7

(i)Landless 7 13 20 5 3 8 0 0 0

(ii) SF 23 21 44 6 3 9 0 0 0

(iii) MF 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 3 2 2 7 45 34 79 11 6 17 0 0 0

5 LIMBADIYA 2 2 0 4

(i)Landless 11 23 34 1 13 14 11 12 23

(ii) SF 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 2 2 0 4 22 23 45 1 13 14 11 12 23

Table no. 33: UG detail

S. No. Village Name

Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category


1 DABHODA 12 1 10 23

(i)Landless 187 88 275 31 26 57 8 5 13

(ii) SF 221 139 360 39 26 65 0 0 0

(iii) MF 58 0 58 5 0 5 0 0 0

(iv) LF 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 476 227 703 75 52 127 8 5 13

2 VALAD 11 1 9 21

(i)Landless 189 116 305 20 31 51 6 4 10

(ii) SF 297 88 385 29 38 67 0 0 0

(iii) MF 97 0 97 9 1 10 0 0 0

(iv) LF 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 590 204 794 58 70 128 6 4 10

3 VADODARA 7 0 3 10

(i)Landless 50 12 62 9 2 11 5 2 7

(ii) SF 66 19 85 11 3 14 0 0 0

(iii) MF 64 0 64 6 0 6 0 0 0

(iv) LF 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 184 31 215 26 5 31 5 2 7

4 MAGODI 7 0 9 16 (i)Landless 198 99 297 34 11 45 5 3 8

(ii) SF 256 89 345 45 29 74 0 0 0

(iii) MF 99 0 99 12 2 14 0 0 0

(iv) LF 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 559 188 747 91 42 133 5 3 8

5 LIMBADIYA 1 0 1 2

(i)Landless 16 12 28 4 1 5 3 0 3

(ii) SF 28 8 36 7 0 7 0 0 0

(iii) MF 19 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 66 20 86 11 1 12 3 0 3

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Names of Villages

Amount earmarked for

EPA Entry Point Activities planned Estimated cost Expected outcome

1 Dabhoda 9.15

Drinking Water Pipeline 1.49

Drinking Water Facility Drinking Water Pipeline 2.24

Drinking Water Pipeline 1.58

Radi 1.58 Protection from Soil Erosion

Radi 2.07

Total 9.15

2 Magodi 5.49

Pipeline For Havada 2.79 Drinking Water Facility for Cattles

Dhobighaat with shed 2.68 Cloths Washing facility for

Women

Total 5.49

3 Vadodara 3.51


Radi 1.57

Total 3.51

4 Limbadiya 1.67 Drinking Water Pipeline 1.67 Drinking Water Facility

Total 1.67

5 Valad 7.04


Dhobighaat with Shade 1.19 Cloths Washing facility for

Women

Protection Wall 3.36 Protection from Soil Erosion

Total 7.02

Total 26.84 - 26.84 -

Village : VadodaraRuddey Repairing

For ease in Transportation during Monsoon and Prevention of Soil Erosion

Identified EPA Photos of cluster with complete information

Village : VadodaraRuddey Repairing

For ease in Transportation during Monsoon and Prevention of Soil Erosion

Village Name: Dabhoda (Ruddey)

Village Name : LimbadiaProposed EPA- Drinking Water Pipeline

Length: 350 Met

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence

approach should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 56% percent is allotted

for this work.

Ridge Area Treatment Plans:

It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in

Vasana watershed. For the ridge area treatment of Vasana watershed following structure are been Proposed after interaction among

Gram Sabha, watershed committee, Project Manager and other field staff of project.

1. Check dams

Check Dam is a structure constructed using cement and concrete across the river of comparatively wider water channel. This

structure is preferred where the height of both the banks of river is considerably high and the width of river channel or stream is

less.

Advantages of check dams: The advantages of check dams are that they store surface water for use both during and after the

monsoon. They help in ground water recharge of the area. Recharge of water helps in raising the water table in the area. Availability of

water ensures the increase of agricultural yield by multi-cropping.

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Name of villages

Initiation of village level institution

Capacity building

IEC activities

Baseline survey

Hydro-geological

survey

Identifying technical support agencies

Consolidateion phase

Estimated Cost (Rs. in lakh)

1 Dabhoda 1.60 8.01 1.83 0.82 1.03 0.43 6.87 20.60

2 Vadodra 0.62 3.08 0.70 0.32 0.40 0.17 2.64 7.92

3 Magodi 0.96 4.81 1.10 0.49 0.62 0.26 4.12 12.36

4 Valad 1.23 6.15 1.40 0.63 0.79 0.33 5.27 15.80

5 Limdiya 0.29 1.47 0.33 0.15 0.19 0.08 1.26 3.77

IEC Activity – Slogan Painting on Wall

(1). DABHODA - 35

(2). VADODARA - 15

(3). MAGODI - 30

(4). VALAD - 27

(5). LIMBADIYA - 15

TOTAL……- 122

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Village Name

Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category


1 DABHODA 8 1 5 14

(i)Landless 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 5 5

(ii) SF 269 13 282 39 26 65 0 0 0

(iii) MF 120 8 128 5 0 5 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 0 415 44 26 70 0 5 5

2 VALAD 5 0 2 7

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 177 9 186 29 38 67 0 0 0

(iii) MF 133 3 136 9 1 10 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 310 12 322 38 39 77 0 0 0

3 VADODARA 3 0 2 5

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 46 12 58 11 3 14 0 0 0

(iii) MF 19 7 26 6 0 6 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 65 19 84 17 3 20 0 0 0

4 MAGODI 4 0 2 6

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 76 8 84 14 0 14 0 0 0

(iii) MF 32 15 47 5 0 5 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 108 23 131 19 0 19 0 0 0

5 LIMBADIYA 3 0 1 4

(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(ii) SF 9 5 14 5 0 5 0 0 0

(iii) MF 17 4 21 2 0 2 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 0 35 7 0 7 0 0 0

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Name of Villages

Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging structures

Construction of new recharging structures

Total target

No. Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Estimated cost

No. Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Estimated cost

1 Dabhoda

Recharge Bore

- - - 6 no. 18.8 19.2 18.8 19.2

Total for the village 18.8 19.2 18.8 19.2

2 Vadodara

Recharge Bore

- - - 1 no. 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.2


3 Valad

Recharge Bore

- - - 8 no. 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6


4 Magodi

Recharge Bore

- - - 5 no. 16 16 16 16

Total for the village 16 16 16 16

5 Limbadiya

Recharge Bore

- - - 1 no. 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2


Village: Dabhoda (Check-Dam) Village: Dabhoda (Check-Wall)

Village Name: Dabhoda (Recharge Bore) Village: Magodi (Protection Wall)

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. No.

Names of Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs

involved Average annual income from activity per

SHG

1 Dabhoda

Vermi compost to SHG 1

Agro Centre to SHG 2

Wheat Thresher to SHG 1

Rotavator to SHG 1

Sivan class(tailoring Activity) 2

2 VALAD

Cattle shade for Hiefers to SHG 1



Rotavator to SHG 1


3 MAGODI



Ground Nuts Thresher 1

Rotavator to SHG 1


4 VADODARA

Vermi compost to SHG 1


Rotavator to SHG 1


5 LIMBADIYA

Fodder Development (SHG) 1



Total 31

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target

S. No

.

Name of villages

Ridge area treatment

Drainage line

treatment

Nursery

raising

Land developme

nt

Crop demonstratio

ns

Pasture developme

nt

Fishery developme

nt

Non-conventional energy

Any other (Recharg

e)

Total Estimate

d cost (Rs. In lakhs) (a) (b) (a) (b)

(a)

(b)

(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)

1 Dabhoda

3 no.

6.81 - - - - 22 3.08

0.25 0.2 6

No. 19.2

19 no.

26.38

- - - -

2 no.

6.3 - - - -

2 no.

3.1 - -

3 no.

1.1 - -

1 nos

0.9 - - - -

13 No.

41.86

- -

7 no.

22.15

- - - -

Total

108.6

- - - - 22 3.08

0.25 0.2 6

No.

19.2

2 Vadodar

a

12 no

43.86 - - - - 0.25 0.2 1

No. 3.2

1 no 2.55 - - - -

Total

46.41 - - - - 0.25 0.2 1

No.

3.2

3 Limbadi

ya

6 no 16.2

4 - - - - 0.25 0.24

1 No.

3.2

1 no 3.93 - - - -

Total

20.17

- - - - 0.25 0.24 1

No.

3.2

4 Magodi

2 no - - - - 5

No. 16

6 no 11.2

5 - - - -

6 no 24.5 - - - -

1 no 1.5 - - - -

6 no 22.6

8 - - - -

Total

59.93

- - - - 5

No.

16

5 Valad

3 no.

8.25 - - - - 19.7

5 2.76

5

No. 16

10 No

14.7 - - - -

12 no.

35.72

- -

5 no.

8.2 - -

6 No

2.25 - - - -

4 No

3.6 - -

4 No

9.6 - - - -

Total

82.32

- - - - 19.7

5 2.76

5

No.

16

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*

S. No

.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executi

ng agency

Target

(i) Ridg

e area (R)

(ii) Drainag

e line (iii) (i)

(ii) Communit

y

(iii) Others

(pl. specify

)

(i) UG

No. of units (No./

cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

(D)

Land

dev. (L)

Pri-vat

e

(ii)SHG

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

M W O T

1 Dabhod

a

Check dam R L Wc 5 no. 7.43

2016-2017

Check wall R D L Wc 19 no. 26.38

C.C. lining R L Wc 45

Rm. 6.3

Protection Wall L Wc 299 Rm.

42.51

Pond Deepening L Wc 36774 Cmt.

22.98

Radi

Recharge Bore L C Wc 6 No. 19.2

Drinking Water Pipeline

Pond Outlet

Check Wall Maintenance

R Wc 2 no. 3.1

Bamboo Plantation with

Check Wall R Wc 4 no. 1.35

Afforastration R Wc 1 nos 0.9

Dhobigath

Water Injecting By Pipeline In Old Recharge

Structure

Total 128.1

2 Vadodar

a

Check-Dam R Wc 1 no. 2.78

2016-2017

Check wall

C.C. lining

Protection Wall L Wc 311 RMT

43.24

Pond Deepening

Radi

Recharge Bore L Wc 1 no. 3.2


Pond Outlet


Bamboo Plantation

Afforastration

Dhobigath


Structure

Total 49.2

3 Magodi

Check-Dam

2016-2017

Check wall R D L Wc 6 no. 12.25

C.C. lining


24.94

Pond Deepening L Wc 3470 20.46

6Cmt.

Radi 1 1.1

Recharge Bore L Wc 5 no. 16

Pipeline for Hawada

Pond Outlet 1 no. 2.00


Bamboo Plantation

Afforastration

Dhobigath


Structure

Total 76.25

4 Linbadiy

a

Check-Dam

2016-2017

Check wall

C.C. lining


16.78

Pond Deepening L Wc 5823 Cmt.

3.44

Radi

Recharge Bore L Wc 1 no. 3.2


Pond Outlet


Bamboo Plantation

Afforastration

Dhobigath


Structure

Total 23.37

5 Valad

Check-Dam R C WC 4 No 6.79

2016-2017

Check wall R D L C WC 10 No 14.59

C.C. lining

Protection Wall

Protection Wall L C WC 12 no.

35.96

Pond Deepening

Radi DWDU 3 no. 7.7

Radi

Recharge Bore L 8 no 25.6


C

Pond Outlet


R Wc 5 no. 1.83

Bamboo Plantation

R Wc 6 No 2.25

Afforastration R Wc 4 No 3.6

Dhobigath


Structure

Total 98.32

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No

.

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Ridg

e area (R)

(ii) Drainag

e line (iii) Lan

d dev. (L)

(i) Privat

e

(ii) Communi

ty

(iii) Others

(pl. specify

)

(i) UG

Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated cost Expected

month & year of

completion (mm/

yyyy)

(D) (ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

1 DABHOD

A

Green Manuring L P WC 31.5 - 4.41

2015-16

Bamboo Plantation

L L

WC 1

500 1.1

Afforastration L WC 1 1111 0.9

2 VALAD

Green Manuring L P WC 22 - 3.08

Bamboo Plantation L L

WC 2.5 1100 2.25

Afforastration L WC 3.5 4444 3.6

3 LIMBADIY

A Fodder

L C

SHG

1 1.39

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities

S. No

.

Name of village

Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Privat

e

(ii) Communit

y

(iii) Others

(pl. specify

)

(i) UG Estimate

d cost Expected month & year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

(ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

1 DABHODA

Green Manuring (Ikkad) P 88.UG 3.05

Drip Irrigation system P 72.UG 17.28

Green Net house P 15.UG 9

Vermi compost to SHG P 1.SHG 1.2

Agro Centre to SHG P 2.SHG 2.5

Wheat Thresher to SHG P 1.SHG 1.5

Rotavator to SHG P 1.SHG 1

Animal Camp

C

3 1.20

Cattle Stand With Stand C 3 3

Hand Cart P 5.UG 0.75

Sivan class(tailoring Activity) P SHG 3.00

2 VALAD

Green Manuring (Ikkad) P 79.UG 2.76


Green Net house P 8.UG 4.8

Cattle shade for Heifers to SHG P 1.SHG 1.20




Animal camp

C

3 1.20

Cattle Stand With Stand C

2.00

Sivan class(tailoring Activity) P 2.SHG 2.24

3 MAGODI


Green Net house P 5.UG 3



Ground Nuts Thresher P 1.SHG 1.5


Animal Camp

C

3 1.20

Cattle Stand With Stand C 4 2.00


4 VADODAR

A

Promotion of Floriculture P 2.UG 0.70


Green Net house P 4.UG 2.4

Vermi compost to SHG P 1.SHG 1.20



Animal Camp

C

2 .80

Cattle Stand With Stand C 5 2.50

Sivan class(tailoring Activity) P SHG 1.31

5 LIMBADIY

A

Crop Demonstration (SRI Technique in Paddy)

P 1.UG 0.24


Fodder Development (SHG) C 1.SHG 1.39



Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No.

Name(s) of the villages

CPR particulars

Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of beneficiaries

1 Dabhoda West land Check Dem 5 7.43

Ponds Pond Deepning 9 22.98

2 Vadodara West land Check Dem 1 2.78

Ponds Pond Deepning - -

3 Valad West land Check Dem 4 6.79

Ponds Pond Deepning - -

4 Magodi West land Check Dem - -

Ponds Pond Deepning 34706 CMT 20.46

5 Limbadiya West land Check Dem - -

Ponds Pond Deepning 1 3.44

Capacity Building:-

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights,

knowledge and experience needed to solve problems expeditiously for sustainable livelihood of groups or individuals substantially.

There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going

beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into

account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in

developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Scope of capacity building:-

Income Generation Activities

o Stitching

o Food Processing

o Post Harvest management practices

Fodder development and Management

Afforestation

Gram Vatika

Crop Information

Meteorological Information

Alternative Land Use Plan

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation

Information Dishemination on Audio/Video

Dairy Development and Management

Rural Craft

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

Sr. No.

Name of the Training Institute

Full Address with contact

no., website & e-mail

Type of Institute#

Area(s) of speciali-zation$

Accredita-tion details

Trainings

Reference Year

No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees

to be trained

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra

Randheja, Gandhinagar

Research Institute

Agriculture/ Horticulture/

Animal Husbandry

Govt. 2012-16 2 29

2 Development Support Centre

Ahmedabad NGO Capacity building

Society Registration

Act

2012-16 18 370

3 BISAG Gandhinagar Space application

Remote sensing Govt. 2012-16 2 22

4 Dantiwada Agriculture University,

Dantiwada University Agriculture and Allied fields

Govt. 2012-16 2 120

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

Sr. No. State Project Stakeholders Total no. of persons No. of persons to

be trained No. of training programmes

Estimated cost

1 Gujarat

PIA 2 2 1 4800

WDTs 6 6 15 216000

UGs 22 22 3 158400

SHGs 256 450 5 1152000

WCs 56 56 6 806400

GPs 5 5 1 12000

TOTAL 347 541 31 2349600

*As per Requirement modification will be made during implementation

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Pamphlets and posters DWDU, Gandhinagar 1.24

Awareness about watershed programmes

2 Wall Paintings DWDU, Gandhinagar 1.29

3 Banners and hoardings DWDU, Gandhinagar 1.40

4 Video Shows DWDU, Gandhinagar 1.45

CHAPTER – 5

BUDGETIN

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

S. No. Budget component Cost requirement

1 Administrative costs 67.17

2 Monitoring 6.72

3 Evaluation 6.72

4 Entry Point activity 26.87

5 Institution and Capacity Building 33.58

6 Detailed Project Report 6.72

7 Watershed Development Works 376.13

8 Livelihood activities for asset less 60.45

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 67.17

10 Consolidation phase 20.15

TOTAL 671.68

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

S. No. Village

Activity

EPA Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed Development

Work

Livelihood for Asset less

Production System and

Micro enterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Dabhoda 915427 1144284 228857 12815980.8 2059711.2 2288568 686570.4 20139398

2 Vadodra 351847 439809 87961.8 4925860.8 791656.2 879618 263885.4 7740638

3 Magodi 549466 686832 137366 7692518.4 1236297.6 1373664 412099.2 12088243

4 Valad 702384 877980 175596 9833376 1580364 1755960 526788 15452448

5 Limdiya 167486 209358 41871.6 2344809.6 376844.4 418716 125614.8 3684701

Total 2686610 3358263 671653 37612545.6 6044873.4 6716526 2014957.8 59105429

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

S. No. Village Total cost requirement Total funds

available under IWMP

Gap in funds requirement Work taken

1 Dabhoda 204.93 171.64 33.29 Pond deepening & GGRC and

RKVY

2 Vadodra 24.41 16.71 7.7 GGRC and RKVY

3 Magodi 37.99 26.09 11.9 GGRC and RKVY

4 Valad 48.76 33.36 15.4 GGRC and RKVY

TOTAL 316.09 247.8 68.29 -

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Village Activity to be

carried out

Fund made available to IWMP due to convergence

(Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which convergence took place

Reference no. of activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for

convergence was taken

1 Dabhoda Pond Deepening 11.003 MGNREGS

Table-49 Vilage Level

2 Dabhoda Drip Irrigation 50.04 GGRC and RKVY

3 Vadodra Drip Irrigation 14 GGRC and RKVY

4 Magodi Drip Irrigation 32.9 GGRC and RKVY

5 Valad Drip Irrigation 41.3 GGRC and RKVY

6 Limbadiya Drip Irrigation 9.1 GGRC and RKVY

TOTAL 158.743 - - -

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S. No.

Name of Private Sector

Partner Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution Partnership

Interventions Expected Outcomes

Comments a)MoU b)Contract

c) Any other (pl. specify)

IWMP Private sector

- - - - - - - -

CHAPTER – 6

OUTCOMES

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:*

S. NO.

Names of

Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Dabhoda 5126 0 34307 11665 39434 62 0 446 152 659 17 0 76 27 120

2 Vadodra 1970 0 13186 4483 15156 24 0 171 58 253 7 0 29 10 46

3 Magodi 3077 0 20592 7001 23669 37 0 268 91 396 10 0 46 16 72

4 Valad 3933 0 26323 8950 30257 47 0 342 116 506 13 0 58 21 92

5 Limdiya 938 0 6277 2134 7215 11 0 82 28 121 3 0 14 5 22

TOTAL 15045 0 100686 34233 115731 181 0 1309 445 1934 51 0 223 80 353

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sr. No. Names of villages

No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of

migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Dabhoda 58 31 65 52

2 Vadodara 41 22 54 43

3 Valad 35 19 56 45

4 Magodi 53 29 62 50

5 Limbadiya 19 10 51 41

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level (Meters) Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)

1 Dabhoda Bore Well

150-170 Meters 115-145 Meters

2 Vadodara Bore Well

3 Valad Bore Well

4 Magodi Bore Well

5 Limbadiya Bore Well

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

S. No. Names of Villages

Availability of drinking water Quality of drinking water

Comments (No. of months in a year)

Pre-project Expected Post

project Pre-project

Expected Post-project

1 Dabhoda

12 12 Potable Potable -

2 Vadodara

3 Valad

4 Magodi

5 Limbadiya

Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project areas

Name of village Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.

Area Average Yield per ha (qtl)

(ha) (ha)

DABHODA

Kharif

Castor 715.00 19.23 807.95 22.31

Paddy 314.00 21.80 342.26 24.42

Rabi

Wheat 553.00 22.36 635.95 26.38

Mustard 326.00 24.00 352.08 26.88

Zaid

Bajra 156.00 20.79 176.28 24.32

Sorghum 107.00 6.32 129.47 7.27

Village total 2171.00 114.50 2443.99 131.58

VALAD

Kharif

Castor 655.00 20.30 740.15 23.55

Paddy 78.00 20.36 85.02 22.80

Rabi

Wheat 460.00 23.12 529.00 27.28

Mustard 59.00 27.96 63.72 31.87

Zaid

Bajra 36.00 24.29 40.68 28.42

Sorghum 24.00 6.89 29.04 7.92

Village total 1312.00 122.92 1487.61 141.85

MAGODI

Kharif

Castor 269.00 19.78 303.97 22.94

Sorghum 38.00 34.00 45.98 39.10

Rabi

Wheat 197.00 22.37 226.55 26.40

Potato 35.00 270.00 39.55 297.00

Zaid

Bajra 28.00 21.56 31.64 25.23

Sorghum 22.00 7.12 24.42 8.19

Village total 589.00 374.83 672.11 418.85

VADODARA

Kharif

Castor 195.00 18.90 220.35 21.92

Sorghum 25.00 6.14 30.25 7.06

Cotton 38.00 6.10 43.70 7.50

Rabi

Wheat 178.00 23.10 204.70 27.26

Potato 42.00 265.00 47.46 291.50

Zaid

Bajra 25.00 19.96 28.25 23.35

Sorghum 16.00 5.98 19.36 6.88

Village total 519.00 345.18 594.07 385.48

LIMBADIYA

Kharif

Castor 90.00 18.20 101.70 21.11

Paddy 24.00 18.30 26.16 20.50

Rabi

Wheat 76.00 20.39 87.40 24.06

Mustard 42.00 28.65 45.36 32.66

Zaid

Bajra 21.00 23.31 23.73 27.27

Sorghum 16.00 6.58 19.36 7.57

Village total 269.00 115.43 303.71 133.17

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be

covered through IWMP

1 Dabhoda 295.2 0

2 Vadodara 161.7 0

3 Valad 179.66 0

4 Magodi 173.12 0

5 Limbadiya 41.85 0

TOTAL 851.53 0

Table no. 58: vegetative cover

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Dabhoda 300 2

2 Vadodara 166 0

3 Valad 176 5

4 Magodi 207 0

5 Limbadiya 46 0

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of Village

Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No. Yield Income(Lecks/day) No. Yield Income

1 Dabhoda

Milch-animals

Cow 1057 4756 1.9 1300 6325 2.55

Buffalo 2003 6009 2.7 2464 7992 3.62

Draught Purpose animals

Bullock 86 - 0.028 106 - 0.04

Animals for other purpose

Goat 131 33 0.0082 161 44 0.01

2 Vadodara

Milch-animals

Cow 820 3690 1.47 1009 4908 1.97

Buffalo 61 183 0.62 75 243 0.83


Bullock 39 - 0.13 48 - 0.17


Goat 898 207 0.052 1105 275 0.07

3 Valad

Milch-animals

Cow 1595 4777.5 1.91 1962 6354 2.56

Buffalo 1505 4515 2.03 1851 6005 2.72


Bullock 45 - 0.015 55 - 0.02


Sheep 123 25 0.01 151 33 0.01

Goat 202 57 0.19 248 76 0.25

4 Magodi

Milch-animals

Cow 950 4275 1.71 1169 5686 2.29

Buffalo 110 330 0.14 135 439 0.19


Bullock 100 - 0.033 123 - 0.04


Goat 520 125 0.031 640 166 0.04

5 Limbadiya

Milch-animals

Cow 288 1296 0.52 354 1724 0.70

Buffalo 52 156 0.07 64 207 0.09


Bullock 12 - 0.004 15 - 0.01


Goat 28 7 0.00175 34 9 0.002

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

1 IWMP-9 Dabhoda

Backward linkages No Yes Yes Seed certification No Yes Yes Seed supply system No Yes Yes Fertilizer supply system No Yes Yes Pesticide supply system No Yes Yes Credit institutions Yes Yes Yes Water supply Yes Yes Yes Extension services No Yes Yes Nurseries No Yes Yes Tools/machinery suppliers Yes Yes Yes Price Support system No Yes Yes Labour No Yes Yes Any other (please specify) No Yes Yes Forward linkages No Yes Yes Harvesting/threshing machinery Yes Yes Yes Storage (including cold storage) No Yes Yes Road network Yes Yes Yes Transport facilities Yes Yes Yes Markets / Mandis Yes Yes Yes Agro and other Industries No Yes Yes Milk and other collection centres No Yes Yes Labour Yes Yes Yes Any other (please specify) No Yes Yes

------------------------------------------- XXXXXX------------------------------------------

Documents

Gandhiagargswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2011-2012/Gandhinagar/GAN...Detailed Project Report (Year 2011 - 12) District Watershed Development Unit Gandhiagar IWMP - 9 ( Dabhoda ) 1.1