43
Proposal Arguments Addresses problems by calling for action in practice or policy. My proposal regarding Toronto Pet Heaven

Proposal Arguments

  • Upload
    lou

  • View
    54

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Proposal Arguments. Addresses problems by calling for action in practice or policy. My proposal regarding Toronto Pet Heaven. Enthymeme. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Proposal Arguments

Proposal Arguments

Addresses problems by calling for action in practice or policy.

My proposal regarding Toronto Pet Heaven

Page 2: Proposal Arguments

Enthymeme

• Toronto Pet Heaven should be put out of business because they are practicing veterinary medicine without a license, they inflict undue suffering on vulnerable pets and owners, and the company also exploits pet owners financially by drastically inflating the costs of their service.

Page 3: Proposal Arguments

Logos/Ethos/Pathos (the rhetoric triangle)

• If you don't have a particular intended audience in mind, or if you say that your essay is for "everybody" or "society" or "people interested in this topic," your writing will tend too general and unpersuasive.

• Try to think in terms of a scale of resistance to your argument: Between “accord” and “resistance” there is a range of opinions. On what basis do they support or reject your position?

Page 4: Proposal Arguments

Scale of resistance for new stadium ballot initiative

• Accord—those who offered strong support for the initiative .

• Neutral—those who were undecided or uncertain.• Resistance—those who disagreed for a variety of

reasons:Either they had no interest in sports, they were opposed

to public funding of sports, opposed to raising taxes, were opposed to the re-zoning and increased traffic in the area, or were opposed to the retractable roof planned.

Page 5: Proposal Arguments

Resistance to ERA and the Draft for women

• A student who proposes ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment will face resistance from various religious, conservative and feminist groups.

• Right wing groups will argue that it destroys family values and traditional gender roles to have women register for selective service.

• Feminists will object on the basis that women should reject the authority of the military-industrial complex and instead seek quantifiable changes to the power structure in the U.S.

Page 6: Proposal Arguments

Your Audience

• Do you omit, refute, concede or incorporate your audience’s views into your argument?

• Choices about structure, content and tone may differ depending on if your audience is sympathetic, neutral or strongly resistant to your views.

• One-sided vs. Multisided arguments.• The need to overcome “the law of inertia.”

Page 7: Proposal Arguments

• Do you want to persuade your audience through accommodation or refutation of their beliefs or values?

• Your argument requires “presence” in order to have your audience recognize the immediacy of the problem. “Presence” links to pathos.

• You are compelled through the “principle of charity” to fairly summarize opposing arguments.

Page 8: Proposal Arguments

Strategies for Rebutting Evidence

• Deny the truth of the data.• Cite examples and testimony

to counter the data.• Cast doubt upon the

examples being representative, sufficient, or accurate.

• Cast doubt upon the relevance of data or that it’s out of date.

• Call into question the credibility of an authority.

• Question the accuracy or context of quotations.

• Question the way statistical data were produced or interpreted.

Page 9: Proposal Arguments

Rogerian Argument

• Psychologist Carl Rogers developed the strategy of “empathic listening” for addressing resistant audiences and resolving differences.

• It emphasizes the ability to see an issue sympathetically from another’s perspective. Reserve judgments until you understand a person’s reasoning and values.

• Arguments can be threatening. A Rogerian approach emphasizes compromise and synthesis of positions.

• It stresses self-examination, clarification and accommodation and usually delays the thesis.

Page 10: Proposal Arguments

• Your proposal argument should address a real problem based in a controversial issue.

• Controversy implies at least two opposing views exist about an issue regarding the quality of civic life.

• A proposal should be based on problem-solving in your local community.

• Fashion, Creatine, legal drinking age or drug status, etc. are not real problems.

Page 11: Proposal Arguments

Narrow, local, concrete

• Practical proposals call for action to solve a local or immediate problem.• Policy proposals offer a broad or

sweeping plan to solve larger social, economic or political problems.

Page 12: Proposal Arguments

• Is the proposal practical and does it really have a chance of being enacted?• What are the potential positive and

negative consequences of the proposal? You are required to make predictions.

Page 13: Proposal Arguments

Local Topics

• Avoid any topic on a national or international scale. Select a topic connected to your life at university or your community.

• Offer a proposal to ban plastic shopping bags.• Offer a proposal to ban plastic water bottles.• Offer a proposal to have green bins installed in

city parks to collect dog poop.• Offer a proposal to have a bike lane installed on

Bloor Street.

Page 14: Proposal Arguments

More topics

• What are problems you can identify on campus? (dorms, safety, financial aid, transportation)

• At your place of employment? (customer traffic, merchandise display, company policy)

• Problems in your neighbourhood? (lighting, safety, dangerous intersections, garbage dumping

Page 15: Proposal Arguments

Claim-Type Strategy and audience appeal

• We should do X (Proposal Claim)• Because X is a Y (categorical claim). Appeals to

audience’s values• Because X will lead to good consequences

(causal claim). Appeals to audience’s idea of good/bad consequences.

• Because X is like Y (resemblance claim). Appeals to audience’s feelings about favourable/unfavourable analogy/precedent.

Page 16: Proposal Arguments

5 parts to drafting your essay

• In the first section, introduce your audience to a problem. Describe it and provide a summary. Say that it can be solved.

• In the second part, present your enthymeme, your claim (we should/should not) +because +reasons. Explain the specifics of how your solution works.

Page 17: Proposal Arguments

• In the third part, give a summary of all the opposing views or solutions and explain why they aren’t valid. You do that by accommodating or refuting alternatives.

• For the fourth section, justify your proposal. It is feasible, solves the problem, and is the best solution.

• Your fifth section offers a conclusion where you re-state your proposal, the main arguments and issue a call for your audience to act.

Page 18: Proposal Arguments

Legalizing Marijuana

Audience: City Council to offer a referendum.Logos builds upon your audience’s willingness to

adopt a more practical solution to solving the “war on drugs.” The present approach implemented for more than 30 years doesn’t work.

Establish ethos or your credibility by stating you’re not a pot smoker. Draw upon pathos by describing how it eased your grandma’s glaucoma symptoms.

Page 19: Proposal Arguments

Part One

• Define the problem:The prohibition on marijuana creates a powerful black

market and gang warfare, results in hazardous illegal grow-ops and in wasted millions of dollars and police enforcement in the failed “war against drugs.” Studies say 40% of Canadians smoke marijuana recreationally, thus turning law-abiding citizens into criminals. In the midst of the growing financial crisis we could benefit from the added tax revenue.

Page 20: Proposal Arguments

Part Two

Enthymeme:• Marijuana should be legalized because

prohibition has allowed a violent drug cartel to flourish, prohibition criminalizes a large percentage of law-abiding citizens, and the taxes collected from legal sales would be beneficial in funding a host of social programs.

Page 21: Proposal Arguments

Proposal

• Stop prosecuting people for possessing marijuana or growing it for personal use.

Page 22: Proposal Arguments

Part three

• Canada’s prosecutorial policy on marijuana and drugs in general has not worked and has been a black hole to swallow funding and human resources. We have to abandon the commitment to following the model set by the U.S. And try something else. Cite number of drug busts and grow-ops each year. If pot smokers have their own supply, the consumer demand for black market weed disappears.

Page 23: Proposal Arguments

Part 4 and 5

• Justify your proposal by citing the percentage of law-abiding adults who smoke weed. Construct a resemblance argument by using Amsterdam as a set precedent for a mix of civic order and marijuana legalization.

• Conclude by summarizing your argument.

Page 24: Proposal Arguments

Style tips from Lesson 3

• Clear writing recognizes that when you narrate events, characters are presented as subjects and their actions are presented as verbs.

• Once upon a time, as a walk through the woods was taking place on the part of Little Red Riding Hood, the Wolf’s jump out from behind the tree occurred, causing her a fright.

Page 25: Proposal Arguments

• Once upon a time, as a walk through the woods was taking place on the part of Little Red Riding Hood, the Wolf’s jump out from behind the tree occurred, causing her a fright.

Subjects are not characters; subjects are instead actions expressed as abstract nouns, walk and jump. The verbs was taking and occurred do not name actions.

Once upon a time, Little Red Riding Hood was walking through the woods, when a wolf jumped out from behind a tree and frightened her.

Page 26: Proposal Arguments

Simple Vs. Whole subjects

• The Federalists’ argument in regard to the destabilization of government by popular democracy WAS BASED on their belief in the tendency of factions to FURTHER their self-interest at the expense of the common good.

• The characters (italicized) are not the subject of the sentence (argument is), the actions (bold) are not verbs (caps), but are rather abstract nouns.

Page 27: Proposal Arguments

• The Federalists ARGUED that popular democracy DESTABILIZED government, because they BELIEVED that factions TENDED to FURTHER their self-interest at the expense of the common good.

• Characters (italicized) are subjects (boldface) and all the actions are verbs (capitalized and boldface).

Page 28: Proposal Arguments

• Action refers to all literal or figurative movement, mental processes, relationships, and conditions. Present action by using verbs.

• Your writing will be unclear by offering too many abstract nouns derived from verbs and adjectives. The technical name for these nouns is nominalization.

• You can nominalize a verb by making it a gerund: She flies (her flying) We sang (our singing).

Page 29: Proposal Arguments

Nominalization

• FROM VERBSDiscover discoveryResist resistanceReact reactionIntend intentionDiscuss discussionEvaluate evaluationInvestigate investigation

• FROM ADJECTIVESCareless carelessnessDifferent differenceProficient proficiencyDifficult difficultyIntense intensityAccurate accuracyClear clearly

Page 30: Proposal Arguments

• If you can place “the” in front of the word, it means it’s a nominalization. If you can place “to” in front of the word, it means it’s a verb.

• Some nominalizations and verbs are identical such as hope, result, request, review and repair.

• For revision, change confusing nominalization into verbs and make the character the subject.

Page 31: Proposal Arguments

• The intention of the committee IS to audit the records.

• The committee intends to audit the records.• The agency CONDUCTED an investigation into

the matter.• The agency INVESTIGATED the matter.• We did a review of the evolution of the brain.• We REVIEWED how the brain EVOLVED.

Page 32: Proposal Arguments

WHEN TO USE NOMINALIZATIONS

• As a subject, it refers to a previous sentence (These arguments depend on an unproven claim [...] This decision can lead to positive changes).

• Nominalizations replace the awkward “the fact that” (The fact that she acknowledged the problem impressed me [...] Her acknowledgement of the problem impressed me).

Page 33: Proposal Arguments

• A nominalization names what would be the object of the verb ( I accepted what she requested [...] I accepted her request).

• A nominalization refers to an overly familiar concept that almost acts like a character (Few problems have divided us as abortion on demand).

Page 34: Proposal Arguments

• Now compare the following two sentences. Which one

seems clearer?• 2a. Despite her knowledge of the need by cities for more

money, the governor executed a veto of a bigger education budget to give encouragement to cities for an increase in local taxes.

• 2b. Although the governor knew that the cities needed more money for schools, she vetoed a bigger education budget to encourage the cities to increase their local taxes.

Page 35: Proposal Arguments

Voice The car was driven by him or He drove the car

• Voice describes the relationship between the action/verb in a sentence and the subject.

• When the subject is the agent or is in command of the verb/action, it is in active voice.

• When the subject is the target or receiver of the verb/action, it is in passive voice.

• Passive voice occurs when the subject and direct object switch roles.

Page 36: Proposal Arguments

Active and Passive Voice

• The passive voice is often a great enemy of concise

writing, in part because the associated subject and verb is weak. If the direct object (“Rats and mice”) controls the action, the voice is passive:

Rats and mice were experimented on by him. • If, on the other hand, the subject of a sentence (“He”)

is on the delivering end of the action, the voice is said to be active:

He experimented with rats and mice.

Page 37: Proposal Arguments

• The program has been suspended by the dean.

The dean has suspended the program.• The results of the experiment were studied by

the researchers. The researchers studied the results of the

experiment.

Page 38: Proposal Arguments

Nic Maronese Hip To Be Square

• Douglas Haddow, in his piece “Hipster: The Dead End of Western Civilization” from the September issue of Adbusters, explores modern “hipster” culture by engaging it directly. He immerses himself in hipster parties, opening his piece by describing his experience at a popular club frequented by the type: a gaggle of smokers standing outside the club adopt what they believe to be a rebellious attitude by quietly cursing the club staff under their breath.

• Haddow recalls in detail the “music” – to his ears nothing more than a melodic massacre set to a techno beat – being spun by the DJ; he tries conversing with a young lady. When he asks, she assures him that this is, indeed, a hipster party, but that she is not a hipster.

Page 39: Proposal Arguments

• He outlines in brief the history of the nature of Western culture, defining it by its tendency to simply buck the conventions of the previous decade’s culture: Western culture is best defined as counter-cultural. He finds that this trend, however, has slowed in the last decade; now the various youth counter-cultural movements that once defined the West have been amalgamated into a blasé genre that escapes definition. This is the genre Haddow refers to as the “Hipster”.

Page 40: Proposal Arguments

Josie Elfassy

How to Sell Maxi Pads and Dish Soap: an Ad AnalysisAs women, our lives constantly get in the way of having fun and pampering ourselves. Dishes, sudsy water, and the dreaded ‘that time of the month’ are our enemies and we try to put up a decent fight against them, but the attack is relentless. The only way we can shield ourselves from the horrors of this war is if we listen to the profound advice of Always maxi pads and Fairy dish soap. Ladies, salvation has finally arrived.

Page 41: Proposal Arguments

• Fairy and Always use visuals and copy to attract their target audiences. Fairy uses crystal champaign glasses, a pile of plates, a granite countertop and a sleek faucet to show the clean-up of a dinner party. These visuals also set a standard for the Fairy brand. They create an image of a mid-upper class kitchen, and thus a mid-upper class consumer of their product. This ad suggests that wealthy, sensible women who throw parties are still stuck with the dishes, but all is not lost because Fairy will make sure their skin is not dried out by their soap. The target audience is any woman, age 27-45, young enough to feel empowered by the model who cares about her skin; old enough to be responsible for piles and piles of dishes. The ‘party’ element in the ad creates a narrative about the life of the single gal who has time to throw parties and worry about the dishes the next day while giving herself a facial. This fantasy is being used to allure married women, most likely with children, who can only dare to dream about the fun, single lifestyle.

Page 42: Proposal Arguments

• Always has a slightly different audience. Although their audience is also clearly female, Always cater to a much younger crowd. The blue colors, the bumper car, the whimsical lines, and the text give the ad an uplifting tone. Always uses phrases such as ‘occasional bumps’ and ‘whatever day it happens to be’ to make light of the situation – the period. The ‘period problem’ is so simple that a contoured pad can solve all the issues that come with menstruation. The (plentiful) copy not only makes light of our problem, it also gives us a suggestion on how to live out lives, full of fun. Words like ‘always’, ‘ultra’ and ‘secureguard’ give the brand a dependable and trustworthy face while the ridiculously ironic slogan ‘Have a happy period’ turns the brand into a caring friend (even though it seems like mockery) . The simplification and ‘easy breezy’ attitude signal that the target audience is teenage girls who are still struggling to get used to womanhood, any woman over the age of 25 would be used to her ‘own’ brand and might be considered too old to try a new brand.

Page 43: Proposal Arguments

• Both Fairy and Always use images, colors, and words to make themselves the saviors for all women who have to live ‘womanly lives’. These ads make their viewers into miserable mothers and teenagers locked away because of their misfortunes. The characteristics the ads assign to women are enough to make any of us wallow in self pity and dream of a fairy godmother to come turn us into a carefree and whimsical princess.