Upload
micol
View
20
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
PROPOSITION 39 BONDS. LEGAL, AUDIT and CBOC REQUIREMENTS. Proposition 39 Requirements. History November 7, 2000 Voters Approved Proposition 39 “Smaller Classes, Safer Schools and Financial Accountability Act” Amended portions of the California Constitution (Article 13A) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
PROPOSITION 39 BONDSLEGAL, AUDIT and CBOC
REQUIREMENTS
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 2Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements• History
November 7, 2000• Voters Approved Proposition 39• “Smaller Classes, Safer Schools and Financial
Accountability Act”• Amended portions of the California Constitution
(Article 13A)• Added Education Code Sections 15264 – 15288 –
“Strict Accountability in Local School Construction Bonds Act of 2000”
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 3Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Constitution – Article 13A
Bond proceeds can only be used for Construction Reconstruction Rehabilitation Replacement of facilities Acquisition or lease of real property for facilities
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 4Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Constitution – Article 13A
Bond proceeds cannot be used for: Teacher salaries Administrator salaries School operating expenses
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 5Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Constitution – Article 13A
School Board must formulate a projects list School Board must certify that they have:
Evaluated safety needs Evaluated class-size reduction needs Evaluated information technology needs
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 6Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Constitution – Article 13A
School Board must conduct an annual, independent performance audit to ensure that the funds have been expended only on the specific projects listed
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 7Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Constitution – Article 13A
School Board must conduct an annual, independent financial audit of the proceeds from the sale of the bonds until all of those proceeds have been expended for the school facilities projects
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 8Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Education Code Section 15272
Requires establishment of a Citizens’ Oversight Committee
Requires annual independent audits “to assure that funds are spent only on school and classroom improvements and for no other purposes”
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 9Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Education Code Section 15278
Establishes purpose of the Citizens’ Oversight Committee, which shall: Inform the public concerning the expenditure of bond
revenues Actively review and report on the proper expenditure of
funds for school construction Advise the public about compliance with Article 13A of
the State Constitution
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 10Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Education Code Section 15278
Establishes purpose of the Citizens’ Oversight Committee, which shall (continued): Provide oversight for:
Ensuring that bond revenues are expended only for the purposes described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 1 of Article 13A; and
Ensuring that no funds are used for teacher or administrative salaries or other school operating expenses
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 11Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Education Code Section 15278
Citizens’ Oversight Committee may do the following: Receive and review copies of the annual independent financial and
performance audits Inspect school facilities to ensure bond funds are spent in
accordance with Article 13A Receive and review copies of deferred maintenance proposals or
plans Review efforts by the District to maximize bond revenues by
implementing cost-saving measures: Reduce costs of professional fees Reduce costs of site preparation Joint use of core facilities Incorporating efficiencies in schoolsite design Cost-effective and reusable facility plans
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 12Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Education Code Section 15278
Citizens’ Oversight Committee may do the following: Receive and review copies of the annual independent financial and
performance audits Education Code Section 15286 has been added to require the
annual financial and performance audits be submitted to the Citizens’ Oversight Committee by March 31 of each year
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 13Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Education Code Section 15280
School District Governing Board shall provide to the citizen’s oversight committee (without expending bond funds): Necessary technical assistance Administrative assistance
Citizen’s Oversight Committee: Meetings open to the public; properly noticed Report to the Governing Board at least once per year Minutes of meetings are public records Minutes of meetings shall be available on an Internet website
maintained by the District
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 14Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Proposition 39 Requirements California Education Code Section 15282
Describes the composition of the Citizens’ Oversight Committee
Minimum of seven members, of which five must be:1. Active Business member2. Active Senior Citizens’ Organization3. Active Bona Fide Taxpayers’ Organization4. Parent or Guardian of a child enrolled in the District5. Parent or Guardian of a child enrolled in the District, active in
Parent-Teacher Organization District Employees, Officials, Vendors, Contractors and
Consultants are prohibited from serving on the Committee
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 15Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
SCUSD CBOC Bylaws (1/16/2007) Establishes purpose of the Citizens’ Oversight
Committee, which shall (Section 3): Inform the public concerning the District’s expenditure of
bond proceeds (3.1) Review expenditure reports produced by the District to
ensure (3.2): Bond proceeds are expended only for the purposed set
forth in the ballot measure No bond proceeds are used for any teacher or
administrative salaries or other operating expenses
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 16Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
SCUSD CBOC Bylaws (1/16/2007) Establishes purpose of the Citizens’ Oversight
Committee, which shall (Section 3)(continued): Present to the Board, in public session an annual written
report which shall contain the following (3.3): A statement whether the District is in compliance with
the requirements of Article XIIIA, Section 1(b)(3) of the California Constitution; and
A summary of the Committee’s proceedings and activities for the preceding year
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 17Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
SCUSD CBOC Bylaws (1/16/2007) Citizens’ Oversight Committee may do the following
(Section 4.1): Receive and review copies of the annual independent
financial and performance audits Inspect some of the facilities and grounds for which bond
proceeds have been or will be expended Receive and review copies of deferred maintenance
proposals or plans developed by the District Provide input and advise to District staff and the Board
regarding the selection of an independent auditor for performance audit of bond funds
Make requests for copies or inspection of District records in writing to the Chief Financial Officer
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 18Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
SCUSD CBOC Bylaws (1/16/2007) Citizens’ Oversight Committee is not empowered to
do any of the following (Section 3.4): Approval of construction contracts Approval of construction change orders Appropriation of construction funds Handling of legal matters Approval of construction plans and schedules Approval of Deferred Maintenance Plans Approval for sale of bonds
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 19Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
SCUSD CBOC Bylaws (1/16/2007) Citizens’ Oversight Committee is not responsible for any of
the following (Section 3.5): Projects financed through the State of California, developer fees,
COPs, lease/revenue bonds or sale of surplus property (all sources not involving Proposition 39 bond proceeds)
Establishment of priorities and order of construction for bond projects Selection of architects, engineers, soils engineers, construction
managers, project managers, CEQA consultants and other professional service firms required to complete the bond projects
Approval of design for bond projects Selection of independent audit firm, performance audit consultants
and other consultants necessary to support the activity of the committee
Approval of an annual budget for the Committee necessary for the committee to carry out its activities
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 20Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Performance Audit Standards Performance Audit Standards
Described in Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (the “Yellow Book”)
Did not exist in GAGAS in 2000 when Proposition 39 was passed
Added to GAGAS in 2003; further enhanced in 2007
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 21Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Performance Audit Standards Recent Developments:
SB 1473 (EC 15286) Introduced 2/19/10 Amended 3/25/10 and 4/12/10 First hearing 4/14/10 Passed Assembly 8/16/10; Passed Senate 8/26/10 Signed by Governor 9/22/10 Became effective January 1, 2011 EC 15286 clarifies Education Code to state that the Performance
Audit required under Proposition 39 must be done in accordance with Generally Accepted Governmental Auditing Standards
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 22Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Performance Audit Standards GAGAS General Standards
Independence Professional Judgment Competence Continuing Professional Education Quality Control
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 23Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Performance Audit Standards GAGAS Fieldwork Standards
Reasonable Assurance Significance Audit Risk Planning Supervision and Review Sufficient, Appropriate Evidence Audit Documentation
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 24Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Performance Audit Standards GAGAS Reporting Standards
Reporting Report Contents
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 25Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Performance Audits What will the Auditor look for?
Internal Controls Documentation of the control environment Verification that the controls work Compliance with laws and regulations Compliance with District controls
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 26Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Performance Audits What will the Auditor look for?
Bond Expenditures Expenditure details agree with District’s financial
statements / General Ledger Sample of expenditures
District procedures are followed Compliance with Bond provisions Compliance with project list School / classroom improvements; not teacher or
administrator salaries
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four®
© 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP 27Audit | Tax | Advisory | Risk | Performance
Crowe Horwath LLP is an independent member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member firm of Crowe Horwath International is a separate and independent legal entity. Crowe Horwath LLP and its affiliates are not responsible or liable for any acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath International or any other member of Crowe Horwath International and specifically disclaim any and all responsibility or liability for acts or omissions of Crowe Horwath International or any other Crowe Horwath International member. Accountancy services in Kansas and North Carolina are rendered by Crowe Chizek LLP, which is not a member of Crowe Horwath International. This material is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial or legal advice. Please seek guidance specific to your organization from qualified advisers in your jurisdiction. © 2012 Crowe Horwath LLP
Performance Audits What will the Auditor look for?
Oversight Committee Relationship to the Governing Board Compliance with oversight responsibilities
Reports to the Board Committee meeting minutes Accessibility of website information