Upload
others
View
11
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Putting Floquet theory to work:Random hopping systemsRandom hopping systems
and topological phases with time dependent Hamiltonians p g p p
Yue (Rick) Zou (Goldman Sachs, Hong Kong)Netanel Lindner (Caltech, IQI)Ryan Barnett (UMD)Ryan Barnett (UMD)Victor Galitski (UMD)Gil Refael (Caltech)
Funding:gPackard Foundation,
Sloan Foundation,NSF
Exotic wave functions seeking parent Hamiltonian
• Motivation: realizing interesting Hamiltonians using temporal modulation.
Inspiring example: Fractional quantum Hall in optical lattices,Sorensen, Demler, Lukin (2004)
• Personal obsession: Dyson singularity in random hopping systems.
• Current fascination: 2d Topological insulators.d opo og c su o s.
Outline
Part 1 – Random hopping
• Dyson singularity in random hopping models.
Part 1 Random hopping
• Dynamic localization.
• Modulated Anderson disorder - properties.p p
• Experimental realization
P t 2 T l i l hPart 2 – Topological phases
• 2d Topological phases crash course
• How can we topologize the trivial?
• Experimental realization (?)
R d h i d lRandom hopping models
Particle-hole symmetric localizationR d h i i 1d• Random hopping in 1d:
sjsiij cctH ,,ij
t
2 3 4 5 6 7
Particle-hole symmetric localizationR d h i i 1d• Random hopping in 1d:
sjsiij cctH ,,ij
• Chiral (sublattice) symmetry – delocalized state at band center in 1d and 2d.Gade, (1993), Motrunich, Damle, Huse, (2001).
• Random hopping localization vs. interactions in 2d?
See M. Foster, A. Ludwig. Etc.
• Mott glass phase for random bosons (incompressible and gapless).
Altman, Kafri, Polkovnikov, GR (2006), Orignac, Le Doussal, Giamarchi (1998).
Properties of a random hopping model
D i f )(E
Dyson (1953)Thouless (1972)Fisher (1994)
• Denstity of states:
kuE cos2
Pure chain:
)(E
kuEk cos2
22421)(
EuE
Random hopping chain:1)(
E
EEE 3ln
1~)(
• End-to-end wave function decay:End to end wave function decay:
/1 ~ L
L e
||ln~ EE
Experimental realization? • Disorder typically produced by a speckle potential:
From Fallani , Fort, Inguscio, 08
See also exp’s by:Aspect,
D MDeMarco, etc.
)(xV• Effective potential:
)(xV
sjsiij bbuH ,, iii bbvx
random hoppingProblem:Anderson!
ij
sjsiij ,, i
random potential
Anderson insulator vs. random hopping• Denstity of states:
)(E )(E
E E• End-to-end average correlations:
||ln~ EE constE ~
• Dyson singularity Anderson insulator
I t ti bProblem:Anderson!
• Interacting bosons: Mott glass Bose glass
(incompressible, gapless) (compressible, gapless)
)(xV
Dynamic localization
• Periodically Tilted chain:
Holthaus, Arimondo, and others
)(xV• Periodically Tilted chain:
i
iiii bbbbuH 11i
iii
i bbtFx )cos(
x
ftfVV
fAA
iii chbbtFiuH ..sinexp 1
1
0sin )sin()()(
mm
tix tmxJxJe • Use:fAA
tFxtxf sin),(
iii chbbFuJHH ..)( 10
)(xV
Dynamic localization• Periodically Tilted chain: )(
i
iiii bbbbuH 11
iii
i bbtFx )cos(
x
iii chbbFuJHH ..)( 10
W
F
Fully localized flat-band
u2u2
F
band widthW
u2u2
Eckart, Holthaus,…, Arimondo (2008)
)(xV
Modulated on-site disorder
• Modulated disorder: )(xV• Modulated disorder:
i
iiii bbbbuH 11i
iii
i bbv )cos( t
x
iii
ii chbbtvviuH ..sin)(exp 11
1
0sin )sin()()(
mm
tix tmxJxJe • Use:
i
iiii chbbvvuJHH ..)( 110
More honest analysis: Floquet Hamiltonians
• Periodically varying Hamiltonian:
)(tVHH )(0 tVHH
)()( TtVtV with .0)(0
T
tVand:
• Hamiltonian
0
T
Floquet operator:
tHdtiTU
0
)(exp)(
• Energy eigenstates Quasi-energy states:
TiTU )( 0 2n
Tin
neTU )( 0,0 n T 2
Floquet vs. Random hopping: DOS• Compare exact Floquet quasi energy states with averaged random hopping H:
i
iiii chbbvvuJH ..)( 110
• Compare exact Floquet quasi-energy states with averaged random hopping H:
vs. )cos(ˆ)( 0 tnvHtHi
ii
Density of states:
H i Di d idth
- Floquet
- Time averaged HHopping:1u
Disorder width:10|| iv
- Time averaged H
Floquet vs. Random hopping: DOS• Compare exact Floquet quasi energy states with averaged random hopping H:
i
iiii chbbvvuJH ..)( 110
• Compare exact Floquet quasi-energy states with averaged random hopping H:
vs. )cos(ˆ0 tnvHHi
ii
Localization Length
Effectivedisorder
FloquetHopping:
1uDisorder width:
10|| iv
- Floquet
- Time averaged H
Low frequency de-localization?• Surprising trend appears in the low frequency regime:• Surprising trend appears in the low frequency regime:
FFrequency
Hopping:1u
Disorder width:10|| iv
Possible experimental realization
• Speckle potential interaction:
)(3)(2
rIcrV
)(2
)( 30
rIrV
0
• To produce modulation: f(t)
To produce modulation:
)(~ 0 tf t
f(t)
• Use Bragg spectroscopy to obtain DOS.
Recent fascinations:
Topological phases
First observed topological insulator: CdTe, HgTe heterostructures
HgTe
CdTe
nmdd c
6X •
CdTe
Bernevig, Hughes, Zhang (2006)Koenig,.., Molenkamp.., Zhang (2007)
First observed topological insulator: HgTe• HgTe dispersion (per spin): Dirac cone with small band gap g p (p p ) g p
ˆ0 dH
zppbmypxpd ˆ)(ˆˆ 22 zppbmypxpd yxyx )(
0,0 bm (Trivial) 0,0 bm (Topological)E E
xp
yp xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
)(3.0,2.0 topononbm
Ep
Wrapping the unit sphere?
spheren ˆ z
E
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topononbm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?E
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topononbm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
EWrapping the unit sphere?
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topononbm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?E
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topononbm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?E
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
)(3.0,2.0 topobm
E
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?
Ep
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topobm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?E
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topobm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?E
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topobm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?E
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topobm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?E
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topobm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?E
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
What makes a phase topological?
dH
0 ddn
ˆ )( 22 ppbmppd
• TKNN invariant:
dH 0 ddn )(,, yxyx ppbmppd (map BZ to unit sphere)
E
)(3.0,2.0 topobm
yxBZp
yxxy pn
pnndpdp
he ˆˆˆ
4
2
Wrapping the unit sphere?E
spheren ˆ z
p
spheren z
xx
xpyp
Can we induce a topological phase with radiation effects?S i h l i l H T ll• Start with non-topological HgTe wells:
n
ztA ˆcos
ddn
ˆ
ˆ0 dH 0 dH
zppbmypxpd yxyx ˆ)(ˆˆ 22
0, bm
Irradiation effectsS i h l i l H T ll• Start with non-topological HgTe wells:
n
ztA ˆcos
ddn
ˆ
ˆ0 dH
ˆ)(ˆ
dT
0 dH
zppbmypxpd yxyx ˆ)(ˆˆ 22
0, bm)(ˆexp 21
0
pnssHdtiS S
Irradiation effectsS i h l i l H T ll• Start with non-topological HgTe wells:
ztA ˆcos
)(ˆexp
pnssHdtiST
)(exp 210
pnssHdtiS S
Floquet topological phase
ˆ dH 0 dH
zppbmypxpd yxyx ˆ)(ˆˆ 22
ztA ˆcos
E
xpyp
Equilibration in a Floquet topological phase? (Work in progress)
• Phonons can provide bath for low-energy, low momentum relaxation.p gy,
Experimental realization In (Hg,Cd)Te wells?
HgTe
CdTe(Initially Non- ztB ˆcos HgTe
CdTeTopological)
tB cos
(Tera-Hertz frequencies)
• Using Zeeman coupling:mTB 10~
K1.0~
• Electric field: • Electric field: Linear Stark effect enhancement
mVE 1~ mVE 1~
K10~ kiEErrV
)(
Summary and conclusions
• Periodically modulated systems could be used to stabilize unique
quantum statesquantum states.
R i f d h i M d l d kl l• Recipe for random hopping: Modulated speckle potential.
• Topological insulator on demand: modulate the subband gap.
• Open questions:
Relaxation into a steady state – will the unique properties shine out?y q p p