QPR-RLP-011 - Rev 0 - Guidelines for End User Technical Submissions to RLC

GUIDELINES FOR END USER TECHNICAL SUBMISSIONS TO RLC

QPR - RLP – 011 Rev: 0 Date 8th January 09 Page No. 2

CONTENTS

Serial No.

Description

Page No.

1.0 Objective

3

2.0 Definitions and Abbreviations

3

3.0 Scope

5

4.0 Procedure

5

5.0 Related Documents

8

6.0 Attachments: 9 Attachment-A : Submission category code 001- Product pipe corridor 10 Attachment-B : Submission category code 002- Wet Utility Corridor 13 Attachment-C: Submission category code 003- Underground Power Corridor 16 Attachment-D: Submission category code 004- High Pressure Gas Corridor 19 Attachment-E: Submission category code 005- Common Cooling Water Corridor 21 Attachment-F: Submission category code 006- Telecom Corridor 23

Attachment-G: Submission category code 007- LNG Corridor 25 Attachment-H: Submission category code 008- Lay down area 28 Attachment-I: Submission category code 009- Permanent Access Road 31 Attachment-J: Submission category code 010- Lee breakwater& Liquid Product

Berth 34

Attachment-K: Submission category code 011- Camps 36 Attachment-L: Submission category code 012- Other categories 37 Attachment-M: “Covering Sheet” Format 38 Attachment- N: Crossing matrix- Typical example 39 Attachment- O: Drawing # SK-RLC- 02725 Rev.0

40



1. OBJECTIVE

To establish and maintain a documented Guideline to all End- Users & Contractors for making various technical submissions to RLC.

2. DEFINITIONS / ABBREVIATIONS

Approve To accept as satisfactory, permit or officially agree

END USER A Company or firm that uses services, facilities and

occupies RLC land for the purpose of manufacturing a product or providing a service to RLC or other tenants within RLC.

Contractor A party engaged by End User to perform works / or services under a contract

Guideline Similar to a procedure but less prescriptive in nature. Contains general instructions/guidance to carry out a series of actions.

Shall A mandatory action

Should A preferred course of action or activity

QP Qatar Petroleum. RLC RLIC

QP Directorate -Ras Laffan Industrial City. Ras Laffan Industrial City.

CPW Consolidated Permit to Work. RLP Manager, Industrial Planning & Development/ Ras

Laffan Industrial Planning & Development

RIS HSE

Head of Project Services/ Ras Laffan Infrastructure Project Services. Health, Safety and Environment.

RHE RLC- HSE-Environmental Affairs/ Head of Environment.



RHT RLC- HSE- Safety / Head of Safety

RHS Ras Laffan Security

RHF QHDM QTM QCS FGL NGL TLLA Common Corridor Sub- Corridor m QNHD CGIS-QNG95

RLC- HSE-Fire/ Chief Fire Officer Qatar Highway Design Manual Qatar Traffic Manual Qatar Construction Specification Finished Grade Level Natural Ground Level Temporary Land Lease Agreement A Corridor as per RLC drawing # SK-RLC-170 (Latest revision) A Corridor that is allocated to the specific End-User within the Common Corridor. meter Qatar National Height Datum Centre for Geographic Information System- Qatar National Grid 95



3. SCOPE This guideline covers the general requirements for making Technical Submissions by End-Users/ Contractors to RLC. All End Users before installing any permanent/temporary facility in any of the RLIC common areas, are required to submit all the technical details of the proposed installation to RLC for Review and Approval. In this context the ‘common area’ is defined as any area that is outside the battery limits of End-User’s plant.

4. PROCEDURE

The End-Users/Contractors shall submit the technical document detailing the proposed item of work with necessary drawings & documents. The details submitted shall be conclusive and comprehensive with regard to the relevant information to enable easy and quick review. The submission shall be done in accordance with the following procedure.

4.1. Covering Sheet:

All the submissions shall contain a ‘Covering sheet’ as per the Format attached. (See Attachment: M) The covering sheet must contain the following information:

4.1.1. A unique Submission number with date.

4.1.2. Total number of pages included in the Submission.

4.1.3. All the submissions shall be addressed to :

The Manager Industrial Planning & Development Post Box: 22247 Ras Laffan Industrial City Fax: 474-8489, Tel: 474 8471

4.1.4. Information regarding the originator:

Name and Designation of the person to whom RLC’s response

to be sent. Name of the Company or End User.

4.1.5. FAX Number to which RLC response to be sent.

4.1.6. ‘Name of the Project’ and ‘Subject”

4.1.7. ‘Brief Description’ of the request/ content of the submission.



4.1.8. Contact details (Phone number, Mobile number, email ID) of a person with

whom clarifications on the subject matter are to be sought

4.1.9. SUBMISSION CATEGORY CODE

Submissions are categorised under the following headings based on the nature of work/ location of installation. Indicate the appropriate submission category Code in the relevant box provided in the covering sheet. Submissions under each category shall be made in accordance with the relevant attachment. The Attachment-A to L describes the details that are to be submitted.

CATEGORY CODE

DESCRIPTION

ATTACHMENT

001 Product Pipe Corridors A 002 Wet Utility Corridor B 003 Underground Power Corridor C 004 High Pressure Gas Corridor D 005 Common Cooling Water Corridor E 006 Telecom Corridor F 007 LNG Corridor G 008 Lay down Area H 009 Permanent Access Road I 010 Lee Breakwater & Liquid Product

Berth J

011 Camps K 012 Other categories L

4.1.10. PURPOSE OF SUBMISSION:

The purpose of submission shall be indicated in the appropriate box in the covering sheet by inserting a tick mark. For this purpose the following types are identified:

4.1.10.1. For Approval:

The documents that are submitted to RLC for review and issuance of necessary ‘Approval Letter‘, resorts under this type. The approval letter is necessary for End-User/ Contractor to initiate the Consolidated Permit to Work within RLIC.



4.1.10.2. Supplementary submissions: A submission made subsequent to an earlier submission, supplementing the details that are required for RLC’s review. This may be the result of a clarification meeting between RLC & the End-User/Contractor or a voluntary additional submission of details by the originator

4.1.10.3. Revised submissions:

A subsequent submission made after an original submission totally revising the drawings & documents. This must supersede the original submission. This submission may be the result of a discussion/s with RLC or any other authority involved in the approval/concurring process or a voluntary submission due to an Engineering change.

4.1.10.4. Response to RLC letters:

This type is applicable when revised /supplementary submission is made by the End-User taking into consideration various comments/query communicated to the End-User on an earlier submission in writing. This shall essentially reference the earlier communications from RLC.

4.1.10.5. Information & records:

The submissions that are made to RLC wherein no action from RLC is solicited will come under this type. This will be applicable in the case of reports, as-built details, etc.

4.1.11. The submission must indicate previous reference(s)/ correspondence(s), if any.

4.2. Content of the submission : Ras Laffan Industrial City is divided into several Lots & Corridors, based on the Industrial Land Use Plan, earmarked for specific purposes. RLC controls the use of the land within RLIC boundaries in order to ensure efficiencies and to promote sustainable developments. RLC’s Review & Approval process mainly focuses on details which are pertinent to ensure that the proposals are inline with RLC’s Master Plan. This is to achieve possible synergies with, to evade conflicts between and to avoid interferences with existing/future assets of other End-Users. Thus, RLC’s Review/Approval does not absolve the End-User from checking and ensuring the technical content of the document with regard to its conformity with applicable Codes/Standards & process requirements. Hence all End-Users must refrain from



submitting details such as Fabrication Drawings, Piping Isometrics, Stress Calculations, Design documents etc. unless otherwise requested by RLC.

4.2.1. Drawings & Documents :

4.2.1.1. All the documents shall be in A4 size.

4.2.1.2. All drawings shall be in the standard sheet size (A0/A1/A2 or A3)

prepared as per standard engineering practice. Sketches are not acceptable.

4.2.1.3. All Drawings must be numbered with revision.

4.2.1.4. At least 3 sets of Drawings & Documents must be submitted.

4.2.1.5. Soft Copies :

Submission of soft copies are encouraged. However hard copies are essential as stated above. Also, soft copies of drawings must be in AutoCAD compatible with RLC system.

4.2.2. Coordinates :

The submitted drawings shall be in the CGIS-QNG 95 coordinate system. No other coordinate system will be entertained.

4.3 Acknowledgement of Submissions:

If End-User/ Contractor requires acknowledgement, the documents shall be submitted in person and RLC will acknowledge the receipt of the submission from the Office of RLP on the duplicate of the covering sheet. Submissions made through Post, Courier etc. will not be acknowledged.

5. RELATED DOCUMENTS:

QPR-RLP-010 Regulation for planning and construction of camps at RLIC QPR-RLP-009 Guidelines for corridors and corridor crossings. QPR-RLP-007 Regulation for protection of pipe bridges.



6. ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment-A :

Submission category code 001- Product pipe corridor

Attachment-B: Submission category code 002- Wet Utility Corridor

Attachment-C: Submission category code 003- Underground Power Corridor Attachment-D: Submission category code 004- High Pressure Gas Corridor

Attachment-E: Submission category code 005- Common Cooling Water Corridor

Attachment-F: Submission category code 006- Telecom Corridor

Attachment-G: Submission category code 007- LNG Corridor

Attachment-H: Submission category code 008- Lay down area

Attachment-I: Submission category code 009- Access Road

Attachment-J: Submission category code 010- Lee Breakwater & Liquid Product Berth

Attachment-K: Submission category code 011- Camps

Attachment-L: Submission category code 012- Other categories

Attachment- M: “Covering Sheet” Format Attachment- N: “Crossing matrix”- Typical example

Attachment- O: Drawing # SK-RLC- 02725 Rev. 0



ATTACHEMENT- A Submission Category Code -001: PRODUCT PIPE CORRIDOR This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to PRODUCT PIPE CORRIDOR. PRODUCT PIPE CORRIDOR

Product Pipe Corridors provide space for pipelines to distribute feedstock to processing plants, from plants via rundown pipelines to tank farms or the Port for storage and export of products, and for pipelines between End-Users. Pipelines in these corridors carry liquid products and are normally above ground.

A. PRODUCT PIPE CORRIDOR SUBMISSIONS:

1. Conceptual pipeline routings must be finalised in consultation with RLC. This will be

done with reference to the latest revision of the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170, and inline with the RLIC development plans. After finalisation, submit the conceptual routing for RLC’s review and approval.

2. After the routing is agreed in-principle the End-User will arrive at the requirements

of the sub-corridor based on the process parameters. Once the width requirement is optimized, the exact location of the sub-corridor within the Common Corridor will be advised by RLC.

3. Once the sub-corridor is allocated, the End-User will develop an overall routing

layout clearly indicating the sub-corridor width and location within the common corridor, with all crossings identified and numbered. In this regard a drawing in Plan View is required, clearly identifying all crossings with coordinates in CGIS QNG95 and accompanied with an applicable Crossing Matrix. The Crossing Matrix shall be in accordance with the example attached in Attachment N. RLC can assist in identifying the respective asset owners, if required.

In this context ‘crossings’ mean a location where the allocated sub-corridor intersects in plan (underground or overhead) with another corridor (Occupied , Partially occupied or Unoccupied), as defined in the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170. This overall layout shall be submitted to RLC for review and Approval.

4. Expansion loops shall be vertical.



5. After obtaining the approval for the above overall layout, the End-User shall submit

the following details for RLC’s review and Approval.

a. Non-Crossing locations: Proposed pipe support installation (Excavation details/ Sleeper Details etc) excluding the crossings. The drawing must contain the details as given below, as a minimum. i. Piping Plan with proposed pipe dimensions with all relevant cross

sectional details.

ii. RLC Corridor edges & the allocated sub-corridor edges with relevant coordinates in CGIS-QNG95 system. Relevant dimensions shall be clearly given.

iii. Clearance from the sub-corridor edges shall be indicated. Please see

drawing # SK-RLC-02725 Rev.0, ‘Sketch-A1’ in the ‘attachment O’.

iv. Existing facilities in the same corridor & known planned facilities.

v. Any other information if deemed necessary.

vi. Key Plan

b. Crossing Details:

i. Each crossing must be separately submitted.

ii. The crossing details must conform to RLC’s Guidelines. (Reference: “Guidelines for corridors and corridor crossings“- Document # QPR-RLP-009).

iii. While crossing existing and planned assets of other 3rd Parties,

necessary concurrence shall be obtained from the relevant asset owners.

6. Separate approval for hydro-testing/ pneumatic testing required for the installed

pipelines shall be obtained. 7. The details of the Telltale system to protect the pipe bridges from possible damages

due to movement of heavy vehicles shall be submitted according to the “Regulation for protection of overhead pipe bridges” # QPR-RLP-007.



8. As-built drawings shall be submitted to RLC for records within 6 months after

completion of the construction activities. The As-built drawings shall include two sets of hard copies and a soft copy prepared in AUTO-CAD format compatible with RLC system.



ATTACHEMENT- B Submission Category Code -002: WET UTILITY CORRIDOR This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to WET UTILITY CORRIDOR. WET UTLITY CORRIDOR

Wet Utility Corridor provides space for ‘wet’ utilities such as desalinated water, potable water, and irrigation water. Seawater for back-up firewater could be included in the same corridor in areas where Cooling Water Corridors do not exist. These pipelines are normally laid underground, except Phase I back-up firewater which is aboveground.

B. WET UTILITY CORRIDOR SUBMISSIONS:

1. Conceptual pipeline routings must be finalised in consultation with RLC. This will be done with reference to the latest revision of the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170, and inline with the RLIC development plans. After finalisation, submit the conceptual routing for RLC’s review and approval.

2. After the routing is agreed in-principle, the End-User/ QP-EPC Contractor will

arrive at the requirements of the sub-corridor based on the process parameters. Once the width requirement is optimized, the exact location of the sub-corridor within the Common Corridor will be advised by RLC.

3. Once the sub-corridor is allocated, the End-User/ QP-EPC Contractor will develop

an overall routing layout clearly indicating the sub-corridor width, and location within the common corridor, with all crossings identified and numbered. In this regard a drawing in Plan View is required clearly identifying all crossings with coordinates in CGIS QNG95 and accompanied with an applicable Crossing Matrix. The Crossing Matrix shall be in accordance with the example attached in Attachment N. RLC can assist in identifying the respective crossing owner, if required.




4. After obtaining the approval for the above overall layout, the End-User/ QP-EPC

Contractor shall submit the following details for RLC review & Approval.

a. Non-Crossing locations: The Proposed pipeline routing except in the crossing locations clearly indicating the excavation plan shall be submitted for RLC review and Approval. This must contain the following details, as a minimum.

i. Piping Plan with proposed pipe dimensions with all relevant cross

sectional details.

ii. RLC Corridor edges & the allocated sub-corridor edges with relevant coordinates CGIS-QNG95; Relevant dimensions shall be clearly given.

iii. Existing facilities in the same corridor & known planned facilities.

iv. Normally, the pipelines in the wet utility corridor shall be underground.

The Profile plan (longitudinal) showing the proposed pipeline elevation must be submitted. There must be a minimum cover of 1.00 m with respect to the Finished Grade Level (FGL) or Natural Ground Level (NGL), whichever is lower, or as required by RLC.

v. Clearance from the sub-corridor edges shall be indicated. Please see

drawing # SK-RLC-02725 Rev.0, ‘Sketch-B1’ in the ‘attachment –O’.

vi. Any other information if deemed necessary.

vii. Key Plan




iii. While crossing existing and planned assets of other 3rd Parties,





pipelines shall be obtained. 6. As-built drawings shall be submitted to RLC for records within 6 months after




ATTACHEMENT- C Submission Category Code -003: UNDERGROUND POWER CORRIDOR This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to Underground Power Corridor. UNDERGROUND POWER CORRIDOR Underground power corridor provides space for routing underground power cables at the following rated voltages: 0.415kV, 3.3kV, 6.6 kV, 11kV, 33kV, 132kV, 220kV, and 400kV.

C. UNDERGROUND POWER CORRIDOR SUBMISSIONS:


2. After the routing is agreed in-principle the End-User will arrive at the requirements of the sub-corridor based on the cable design parameters. Once the width requirement is optimized, the exact location of the sub-corridor within the Common Corridor will be advised by RLC.


layout clearly indicating the sub-corridor width, and location within the common corridor, with all crossings identified and numbered. In this regard a drawing in Plan View is required clearly identifying all crossings with coordinates in CGIS QNG95 and accompanied with an applicable Crossing Matrix. The Crossing Matrix shall be in accordance with the example attached in Attachment N. RLC can assist in identifying the respective crossing owner, if required.




4. After obtaining the approval for the above overall layout, the End-User shall

submit the following details, for RLC review and Approval. a. Non-Crossing locations: The Proposed cable routing except in the

crossing locations clearly indicating the excavation plan shall be submitted for RLC review and Approval. This must contain the following details, as a minimum.

i. Cable routing Plan with proposed corridor width.

ii. Cross section showing the cable arrangement/configuration and spacing.

iii. The clearance between centre line of the outer cables and the edge

of the trench bottom shall be 200 mm minimum and shall be 500 mm minimum from the edge of the corridor. This will give a minimum clearance of 1000 mm between centre line of the outer cables and the centre line of future outer cables in the adjacent corridors.

iv. Clearance from the sub-corridor edges shall be indicated. This Clearance shall be decided based on the power ratings in consultation with RLC. End-Users shall take into consideration in their cable design the effects of future cables which will be installed 1000 mm apart. Please see drawing # SK-RLC-02725 Rev.0, ‘Sketch-C1’ in the ‘attachment-O’. Should this condition cause a substantial de-rating of the cable capacity, then a wider corridor is required, and shall be included in the Land Lease Agreement.

v. RLC Corridor edges & the allocated sub-corridor edges with relevant

coordinates CGIS-QNG95. Relevant dimensions shall be clearly given.

vi. Existing facilities in the same corridor & known planned facilities.

vii. The Profile plan (longitudinal) showing the proposed cable elevation

must be submitted. There must be a minimum cover of 1.10 m with respect to the Finished Grade Level (FGL) or Natural Ground Level (NGL) whichever is lower.

viii. Joint bays and cable snacking shall be located within the approved

corridor limits.

ix. Any other information if deemed necessary.



x. Key Plan.




iii. Joint bays shall not be located at the crossings.

iv. While crossing existing and planned assets of other 3rd Parties,






ATTACHEMENT- D Submission Category Code -004: High Pressure Gas Corridor. This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to High Pressure Gas Corridor. HIGH PRESSURE GAS CORRIDOR The pipelines containing gaseous and mixed phase feed stocks and products are categorised under High Pressure Gas Corridor. The High Pressure Gas pipelines are buried in most of the cases. The buried Gas pipelines may be bunded (Soil Blanket) if required.

D. HIGH PRESSURE GAS CORRIDOR SUBMISSIONS:


2. After the routing is agreed in-principle, the End-User will arrive at the requirements of the sub-corridor based on process parameters. Once the width requirement is optimized, the exact location of the sub-corridor within the Common Corridor will be advised by RLC.

3. Once the sub-corridor is allocated, the End-User will develop an overall routing layout clearly indicating the sub-corridor width, and location within the common corridor, with all crossings identified and numbered. In this regard a drawing in Plan View is required clearly identifying all crossings with coordinates in CGIS QNG95 and accompanied with an applicable Crossing Matrix. The Crossing Matrix shall be in accordance with the example attached in Attachment N. RLC can assist in identifying the respective crossing owner, if required. In this context ‘crossings’ mean a location where the allocated sub-corridor intersects in plan (underground or overhead) with another corridor (Occupied , Partially occupied or Unoccupied), as defined in the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170. This overall layout shall be submitted to RLC for review and Approval.



4. After obtaining the approval for the above overall layout, the End-User shall submit the

following details for RLC review & Approval. a. Non-Crossing locations: The Proposed pipe routing, except at the crossing

locations, clearly indicating the excavation plan shall be submitted for RLC’s review and Approval. This must contain the following details, as a minimum.

i. The routing Plan with proposed pipe dimensions with relevant cross

sectional details.

ii. RLC Corridor edges & the allocated sub-corridor edges with relevant coordinates CGIS-QNG95. Relevant dimensions shall be clearly given.

iii. Existing facilities in the same corridor & Known planned facilities.

iv. The Profile plan (longitudinal) showing the proposed pipeline

elevation, NGL, FGL, etc. must be submitted. There must be a minimum cover of 1.50 m with respect to the Finished Grade Level (FGL) or Natural Ground Level (NGL) whichever is lower.

v. Clearance from the sub-corridor edges shall be indicated. Please

see drawing # SK-RLC-02725 Rev.0, ‘Sketch-C1’ in the ‘attachment-O’.

vi. Any other information if deemed necessary.

vii. Key Plan



ii. The crossing details must conform to RLC’s Guidelines. (Reference:

“Guidelines for corridors and corridor crossings“- Document # QPR-RLP-009).

iii. While crossing existing and planned assets of other 3rd Parties, necessary concurrence shall be obtained from the relevant asset owners.





ATTACHEMENT- E Submission Category Code -005: Common Cooling Water Corridor This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to Cooling Water Corridor. COMMON COOLING WATER CORRIDOR This corridor provides space for the following services;

Cooling Seawater headers for supply of seawater to End-Users. Cooling Seawater headers for return of seawater from End-Users to Receiving

Basin/ Outfall Channel. Piping headers for distribution of seawater as Back-up Firewater System.

The pipelines can be installed underground or aboveground.

E. COMMON COOLING WATER CORRIDOR SUBMISSIONS:

1. Conceptual pipeline routings must be finalised in consultation with RLC. This will be done with reference to the latest revision of the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170, and inline with the latest RLIC development plans. After finalisation, the conceptual routing shall be submitted to RLC for review and approval.

2. Once the corridor is allocated, the QP/ EPC Contractor will develop an overall routing

layout clearly indicating the corridor width, with all crossings identified and numbered. In this regard a drawing in Plan View is required clearly identifying all crossings with coordinates in CGIS QNG95 and accompanied with an applicable Crossing Matrix. The Crossing Matrix shall be in accordance with the example attached in Attachment N. RLC can assist in identifying the respective crossing owner, if required.

In this context ‘crossings’ mean a location where the allocated corridor intersects in plan (underground or overhead) with another corridor (Occupied , Partially occupied or Unoccupied), as defined in the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170. This overall layout shall be submitted to RLC for review and Approval.



3. After obtaining the approval for the above overall layout, the QP/ EPC Contractor

shall submit the following details for RLC’s review & Approval.

a. Non-Crossing locations: The Proposed pipe routing except in the crossing locations clearly indicating the excavation plan shall be submitted for RLC review and Approval. This must contain the following details, as a minimum.

i. The proposed piping routing Plan, including pipe dimensions and relevant

cross section details.

ii. RLC Corridor edges with relevant coordinates CGIS-QNG95. Relevant dimensions shall be clearly given.

iii. Existing facilities in the same corridor & Known planned facilities.

iv. For underground installations, the Profile plan (longitudinal) showing the

proposed pipe elevation must be submitted. There must be a minimum earth cover of 1.00 m with respect to the Finished Grade Level (FGL) or Natural Ground Level (NGL) whichever is lower.


vi. Key Plan




iii. While crossing existing and planned assets of other 3rd Parties, necessary

concurrence shall be obtained from the relevant asset owners.

iv. Anchor blocks shall be located at least 10 m away from the crossing locations.





ATTACHEMENT- F Submission Category Code -006: Telecom Corridor This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to Telecom Corridor. The Telecom cables are normally laid underground. TELECOM CORRIDOR This corridor provides space for installing telecom cables for End Users, QP or Utility related Telecom cables. F. TELECOM CORRIDOR SUBMISSIONS:

1. Conceptual pipeline routings must be finalised in consultation with RLC. This will be

done with reference to the latest revision of the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170, and inline with the RLIC development plans. After finalisation, submit the conceptual routing for RLC’s review and approval.

2. After the routing is agreed in-principle and the requirements are known, the exact

location of the telecom duct within the Common Corridor will be advised by RLC. 3. The End-User will develop an overall routing layout clearly indicating the location within

the common corridor, with all crossings identified and numbered. In this regard a drawing in Plan View is required clearly identifying all crossings with coordinates in CGIS QNG95 and accompanied with an applicable Crossing Matrix. The Crossing Matrix shall be in accordance with the example attached in Attachment N. RLC can assist in identifying the respective crossing owners, if required.

In this context ‘crossings’ mean a location where the allocated telecom duct intersects in plan (underground or overhead) with another corridor (Occupied , Partially occupied or Unoccupied), as defined in the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170. This overall layout shall be submitted to RLC for review and Approval.




the following details for RLC’S review & Approval.

a. Non-Crossing locations: The proposed cable routing except in the crossing locations clearly indicating the excavation plan shall be submitted for RLC review and Approval. This must contain the following details, as a minimum.

i. The routing Plan with proposed duct dimensions & spacing.

ii. RLC Corridor edges & the allocated telecom ducts with relevant coordinates in CGIS-QNG95 system. Relevant dimensions shall be clearly given.

iii. Existing facilities in the same corridor & known planned facilities.

iv. The Profile plan (longitudinal) showing the proposed duct elevation, must be

submitted. There must be a minimum cover of 0.60 m with respect to the Finished Grade Level (FGL) or Natural Ground Level (NGL) whichever is lower.


vi. Key Plan




iii. While crossing existing and planned assets of other 3rd Parties, necessary

concurrence shall be obtained from the relevant asset owners.

iv. The bottom elevation of the proposed pull boxes shall be clearly indicated in the longitudinal section. This shall not be installed in a crossing location.





ATTACHEMENT- G Submission Category Code -007: LNG CORRIDOR This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to LNG Corridor Pipeline Routing. LNG CORRIDOR: This corridor provides space for installing End Users’ LNG Run Down pipelines to storage and/ or vessel loading facilities including the routing through the main Breakwater/ New main breakwater.

G. LNG CORRIDOR SUBMISSIONS:


2. After the routing is agreed in-principle the End-User will arrive at the requirements

of the sub-corridor based on the process parameters. Once the width requirement is optimized, the exact location of the sub-corridor within the Common Corridor will be advised by RLC.


layout clearly indicating the sub-corridor width, and location within the common corridor, with all crossings identified and numbered. In this regard a drawing in Plan View is required clearly identifying all crossings with coordinates in CGIS QNG95 and accompanied with an applicable Crossing Matrix. The Crossing Matrix shall be in accordance with the example attached in Attachment N. RLC can assist in identifying the respective crossing owner, if required.

In this context ‘crossings’ mean a location where the allocated sub-corridor intersects in plan (underground or overhead) with another corridor (Occupied , Partially occupied or Unoccupied), as defined in the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170. This overall layout shall be submitted to RLC’s for review and Approval.




the following details for RLC’s review & Approval.

a. Non-Crossing locations: The Proposed pipeline routing except in the crossing locations shall be submitted for RLC’s review and approval. This must contain the following details as a minimum.

i. The routing Plan with proposed pipe dimensions with relevant cross

sectional details.

ii. For LNG pipelines considering the process constraints, horizontal expansion loops are permitted. However to the extent possible this shall be nested.

iii. RLC Corridor edges and the allocated sub-corridor edges with relevant

coordinates CGIS-QNG95. Relevant dimensions shall be clearly given.

iv. Existing facilities in the same corridor & known planned facilities.

v. Piping Plan with proposed pipe dimensions & spacing.

vi. Clearance from the sub-corridor edges shall be indicated. Please see drawing # SK-RLC-02725 Rev.0, ‘Sketch-A1’ in the ‘attachment-O’.

vii. Any other information if deemed necessary.

viii. Key Plan



ii. Loops shall not be located at crossings.

iii. The crossing details must conform to RLC’s Guidelines. (Reference:

“Guidelines for corridors and corridor crossings“- Document # QPR-RLP-009).

iv. While crossing existing and planned assets of other 3rd Parties,



pipelines shall be obtained.



6. As-built drawings shall be submitted to RLC for records within 6 months after completion of the construction activities. The As-built drawings shall include two sets of hard copies and a soft copy prepared in AUTO-CAD format compatible with RLC system.



ATTACHEMENT- H Submission Category Code -008: LAYDOWN AREA This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to lay down areas. LAYDOWN AREA Temporary Site Facilities, Storage yards etc. that are planned in the allocated tract to the End-user/Contractor by RLC under Temporary Land Lease Agreement for facilitating the installation/construction activities, are known as Lay Down areas.

H. LAY DOWN AREA SUBMISSIONS: The End-User/Contractor shall submit the following details for RLC’s review. The review of the details by RLC mainly focuses on the Health, Fire & Life Safety and Environmental aspects.

1. Environmental Baseline Assessment (EBA):

Environmental Base line Assessment Study of the tract shall be done by the contractor in coordination with RLC-RHE section prior to commencement of any activity. Necessary request shall be made for this purpose by the End-User /Contractor.

2. Site Levelling:

The Site levelling of the allocated tract shall be done only after getting necessary approval from RLC taking into consideration the EBA recommendations also. If good top soil exists and inspected by RHE section, the same has to be removed & deposited in the location approved by RLP. The submission for site levelling must contain the following: a. The boundary coordinates as per the TLLA

b. NGL and the proposed FGL of the site in QNHD.

c. The drainage and soak way details (All storm water generated inside the area

shall be managed within the area. In no case this could be let out into RLC drains).

d. Key plan showing the location.



3. Fencing Details:

All temporary lay down areas must be properly fenced. All non-fenced areas will be treated as common areas as defined earlier and RLC CPW procedure will be applicable for all work in non-fenced area. The submission for the Fencing must contain the following: a. The Layout of Fencing with Coordinates in CGIS-QNG95 as per TLLA

b. Details of Fence and Gates. There shall be minimum two exits (gates with

minimum wide of 6 m) from each enclosed area.

c. Fencing shall be covered with a cloth mesh, so as to avoid litter blowing from the site due to wind.

d. Key Plan

4. Temporary Site Facilities: These include the buildings, storage yards, work shops, fabrication shops etc. that are built in lay down areas to facilitate construction. The submission for temporary site facilities must contain the following; a. The Layout showing the internal land use plan & building layouts.

b. Facilities like sand blasting & painting areas, concrete batching plant, chemical

storage, workshop- servicing area, fuel storage, sewage storage, location of DG (Diesel Generator) sets etc. shall be explicitly shown in the layout drawings and shall meet Environmental requirements as advised by RLC-RHE & RHF.

c. There shall be minimum 6 m clearance between the buildings & 4 m clearance

from the fence line.

d. Details of Fire Alarm System, Emergency lighting, Fire extinguishers & Fire water.

e. The Fire & Life Safety Report in consultation with RLC-RHF.

f. The internal road layout including the details of tie-in to the RLC road network.

g. Details of proposed traffic control system at the tie-in location.



h. Details of waste segregation / Storage areas.

i. Details of sewage quantities that requires treatment in RLC wastewater

treatment facilities.

j. Key Plan.



ATTACHEMENT- I Submission Category Code -009: Permanent Access Roads This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to main Access roads. PERMANENT ACCESS ROADS: Permanent access roads are the roads that interconnect the main Plant/Tank Farm/Camps/ similar permanent installations of an End-User with RLC road. This submission must have the following details.

I. PERMANENT ACCESS ROAD SUBMISSIONS:

1. Conceptual Road Layout must be finalised in consultation with RLC based on the relevant Traffic study reports. This layout will be done with reference to the latest revision of the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170 and inline with the RLIC development plans.

2. After the conceptual layout is agreed, the End User /Contractor must develop the

detailed road drawings with all required details including the longitudinal profile based on the agreed conceptual layout. Typical layout shall contain the following:

a. Alignment of road & Longitudinal Profile. b. Existing facilities c. Known planned facilities d. Coordinates of Right Of Way (ROW) and at crossing locations in

CGIS-QNG95 e. Road markings & Traffic signage details as per QTM f. Key Plan

3. In the layout, all crossings must be identified and numbered. In this regard a

drawing in Plan View is required clearly identifying all crossings with coordinates in CGIS QNG95 system and accompanied with an applicable Crossing Matrix. The Crossing Matrix shall be in accordance with the example attached in Attachment N. RLC can assist in identifying the respective crossing owner, if required. In this context, ‘crossings’ mean a location where the allocated road intersects in plan (underground or overhead) with another corridor ( Occupied , Partially occupied or Unoccupied) defined in the RLC Common Corridor Drawing # SK-RLC-00170. This overall road layout shall be submitted to RLC for review and Approval.



4. Depending upon the terrain if natural waterways /existing drains/future drains are interrupted by the proposed road, necessary culverts shall be provided. This shall be done in consultation with RLC.

5. After obtaining the approval for the above layout drawings, the End-User shall

submit the crossing details for RLC’S review & Approval.

a. Crossing Details:

If the proposed access road crosses an existing utility or a proposed corridor the details of the crossing shall be submitted to RLC separately. The following crossing methodology must be followed while preparing the details:

Category CROSSING METHODOGLY TO BE ADOPTED.

Existing Future

Product Pipe Corridor

Pipes on existing sleepers: Provide

Culvert

No provision required. (Necessary culvert will be provided by other End-Users as & when required by open cut method.

Wet Utility Corridor

Provide necessary protection as per the requirement of the asset owner.

Provide Duct Bank (Type # 9 as per drawing No. SK-RLC-00163) to cover the entire width.

Power Corridor

Provide necessary protection as per the requirement of the asset owner.

Provide Duct Bank (Type # 8 as per drawing No. SK-RLC-00163) to cover the entire width.

HP Corridor

Provide necessary protection as per the requirement of the asset owner

No provision required.

Common Cooling Water Provide necessary protection as per the requirement of the asset owner

No provision required

Telecom

Provide necessary protection as per the requirement of the asset owner

No provision required

LNG Corridor

Provide Culvert

No Provision required. (Necessary culvert will be provided by other End-Users as & when required by open cut method with permission.



6. While crossing existing and planned assets of other 3rd Parties, necessary concurrence shall be obtained from the relevant asset owners.





ATTACHEMENT- J Submission Category Code -010: LEE BREAKWATER & LIQUID PRODUCT BERTH This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to pipeline /cable routing through the existing Lee Breakwater Pipe Racks & Liquid Product Berths (also known as Jetties). LEEBREAK WATER & LIQUID PRODUCT BERTH: In the Lee Breakwater & Liquid Product Berths of RLC, the End-User has to route the pipes through the pipe-racks/bridges previously constructed by RLC for the common use of the Liquid Product Berth Occupiers. The following details are required for submissions related to Lee Breakwater and Liquid Product Berth.

J. LEE BREAKWATER & LIQUID PRODUCT BERTH SUBMISSIONS:

1. The conceptual pipeline routings along the existing pipe rack must be finalised in consultation with RLC. This routing will be done based on the available space and inline with the RLIC development plans.

2. After the routing is agreed in-principle, the End-User will arrive at the exact

location of pipelines based on the process parameters and the same shall be approved by RLC.

3. After obtaining the approval for the above overall routing, the End-User shall

submit the following details for RLC’s review & Approval.

a. Piping Plan with proposed pipe dimensions, spacing and details of the existing/planned assets in the same pipe-rack. There shall be cross-sectional details showings different elevations of the pipe racks/bridges.

b. Details of modification required to the existing pipe-rack, if required.

c. Crossing details must be submitted separately, with necessary

concurrences from other relevant asset owners.

d. Existing facilities in the same pipe rack and known planned facilities.

e. Jetty Layout showing the allocation of loading arms, allocation of space behind the loading arms, equipment layout in the allocated jetty area, etc,



f. 3D model output from PDS/ PDMS shall be presented to RLC. On

acceptance of the 3D model, a hard copy shall be submitted for detailed review and approval by RLC.

g. Model review of the End Users designs shall be carried out in three

phases (viz. 30%, 60% and 90%).3D Model shall include all the existing, known planned facilities/ utilities.

h. Any other information if deemed necessary.

. 4. Structural Design :

Since the pipes are routed through a pipe rack/bridge previously built by RLC, it is mandatory for the End User to carry out necessary structural analysis & design verifications, based on the piping stress analysis out put & other loads as per applicable design codes and standards.

a. Load Verification table

The Load Verification Table shall be updated and submitted to RLC for review. This is to ensure that the existing pipe-rack is structurally adequate to resist the loads from the proposed assets. The permission for hydro testing will be given only after the satisfactory submission of the Load Verification Table.

b. Surge Analysis:

End Users must carry out necessary surge analysis to ensure that the forces transferred to the existing pipe-racks/ bridges are within the values considered in the original design. In case, if it exceeds the same, separate arrangement has to be proposed in consultation with RLC so that excessive forces/stresses are not transferred to the existing members.

5. Separate approval shall be obtained for hydro-testing/ pneumatic testing required

for the installed pipelines.

6. As-built drawings shall be submitted to RLC for records within 6 months after completion of the construction activities. The As-built drawings shall include two sets of hard copies and a soft copy prepared in AUTO-CAD format compatible with RLC system.



ATTACHEMENT- K Submission Category Code -011: CAMPS This attachment briefly describes the requirements/details that are to be included in a submission pertaining to Camps in RLIC.

K. CAMP SUBMISSIONS:

1. As per circular # 24/2006 dated 28th May, 2006 & # 31/2007 dated 5th April, 2007, all labourers who are performing work at RLIC must be accommodated inside the boundaries of RLIC. For this purpose the End-Users can utilise the existing RLC camps if vacancies are available or build their own Camps, if not.

2. In lieu of building a new camp, if vacant camps built by other End-Users or

Contractors are available, they can take over the camp with prior permission from RLC subject to conditions stipulated by RLC.

3. For building a new camp in the land allotted to the End-User/ Contractor for that

purpose, it is mandatory to submit all relevant information regarding proposed camps to RLC for review and Approval. This shall be as follows:

a. Camps are to be constructed strictly as per the latest revision of the

‘’REGULATION FOR PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION OF CAMPS AT RLIC’, document # QPR-RLP-010.

b. All submissions related to camps shall be as per the relevant clause for

Technical Detail submission in the above Regulation.

4. As-built drawings shall be submitted as per above Camp Regulation. The As-built drawings shall include two sets of hard copies and a soft copy prepared in AUTO-CAD format compatible with RLC system.



ATTACHEMENT- L Submission Category Code -012: OTHER CATEGORIES

L. OTHER SUBMISSIONS:

The submissions pertaining to the construction /installation items that are not covered under any of the above 11 categories shall be treated as “Category 012 –OTHER CATEGORIES”

Attachment M Page No. 38

NAME OF THE COMPANY (LOGO)

SUBMISSION REFERENCE No. xxxxxDate: xxxxx

NUMBER OF PAGES: xxxxxTO FROM The Manager Industrial Planning & Development, Post Box No: 22247 Ras Laffan Industrial City Fax: 474 8489 Tel: 474 8471

------------------(Name of the Originator) ------------------(Name of the Company)

REPLY TO BE FAXED TO : XXXXXXXXXX

NAME OF THE PROJECT: SUBJECT:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION

---------------------------Name of the Contact Person (for clarifications, if any, on the subject) Tel : Mobile : Email : SUBMISSION CATEGORY CODE: PURPOSE OF SUBMISSION (Please tick) Approval Supplementary submission* Revised submission * Response to RLC letters* Information and Records *Previous references 1. 2.

(Leave this space blank- for RLC purpose only)

Attachments:

Signature Name

Reference C

rossing Identification drawing no. 123456 (P

lan View

)A

TTAC

HM

ENT- N

EastingN

orthingEasting

Northing

e.g.C

C-1

Crossing of D

olphin Energy above

grade product pipelinesE

231456.123N

461123.123E

231123.123N

456123.123

"U

C-1

Crossing of existing underground

power cable 33kV

E231456.123

N461123.123

******

"C

C-2

Crossing of R

LC C

omm

on Wet

Utility C

orridor (10m w

ide)E

231456.123N

461123.123E

231123.123N

456123.123

Mr. D

olphin Energy, C

onstruction Manager, Tel. 1234567,

fax: 1234567, mobile:123456, denergy@

dolphin.com.qa

CR

OSSIN

G M

ATR

IX: TYPICA

L EXAM

PLE

Crossing

No.

Crossing D

escriptionA

sset Ow

ner & C

ontact Details

Crossing Lim

its/Location

RLC

, Manager Industrial P

lanning & D

evelopment, M

r. Abdul

Qader Q

addumi, Tel.4748871, fax:474*&

&^

RLC

, Manager Industrial P

lanning & D

evelopment, M

r. Abdul

Qader Q

addumi, Tel.4748871, fax:474*&

&^

K:\R

LP\N

ew R

egulations- Draft 2008\Technical subm

ission procedure\Approved on 02-02-2009\A

ttachments\A

ttachment - N

- Crossing M

atrix-Page no. 39

Page No. 40

ATTACHMENT- O

Drawing No. SK-RLC-02725 Rev.0

(Sketch A1, B1, C1 & D1)