Upload
chito-permejo
View
97
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quality Control
Lucila B. Rabuco, PhD
Objectives of Laboratory Quality Assurance
OBJECTIVES OF LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE
• Primary Goal
the production of high quality data through
measurement instruments
measurement techniques
that are accurate, reliable, & adequate for its intended purpose
Should be accomplished in a cost effective manner under a laboratory quality assurance program with the following objectives:
Objectives:
1. To measure the accuracy and precision of results within and between laboratories.
2. To continuously assess the reliability of data generated by the laboratory.
3. To detect training needs of the laboratory staff.
4. To identify weak methodology and provide a continuing source of research problems.
5. To provide a permanent record of instrument performance as a basis for validating data and projecting repair or replacement needs.
6. To upgrade the overall quality of laboratory performances.
7. To improve record keeping and report generation.
8. To ensure the integrity of the samples submitted to the laboratory.
9. To help ensure that the laboratory results will withstand legal scrutiny in regulatory actions.
8. Aesthetics
DIMENTIONS OF QUALITY
1. Performance
2. Features
4. Conformance to specifications
3. Reliability
5. Durability
6. Serviceability
7. Perceive quality
DEFINITIONS OF QUALITY
1. Quality is a distinctive inherent feature.
2. Quality is a distinguished attribute.
3. Quality is a degree of excellence.
4. Quality is the totality of features and
characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy given needs.
5. Quality is fitness for use.
7. Quality is freedom from deficiencies.
6. Quality is fitness for purpose.
14. Quality is the loss imparted to society by products.
8. Quality is conformance to specifications.
9. Quality is conformance to requirements.
10. Quality is zero defects,
11. Quality is customer satisfaction.
12. Quality is uniformity around a target.
13. Quality is the opposing force to lower cost and higher productivity.
QUALITY CONTROL
Definition
• Process of monitoring laboratory
analyses to ensure accuracy of results.
Good Quality Control Program
Monitors test performance
Helps identify problems
Helps in assessing reliability of results
Quality Assurance
Encompasses every aspect of the laboratory operation from patient identification, sample acquisition to the clear reporting of the final laboratory result.
Specificity = TN x 100
All w/o disease
( FP + TN )
Specificity
A measurement of the incidence of negative results in persons known to be free of disease (true negative)
Sensitivity = TP x 100
All with disease
( TP + FN )
Sensitivity
A measure of the incidence of positive results in persons known to have a condition ( true positive )
Basic quality control involves the analysis of specific control fluids (serum, urine, CSF) at the same time patient samples are analyzed for the constituents of interest
Terms used in Quality Control
• Accuracy
An indication of how close the answer obtained to the true value
Precision
Indicates how close the single values are to one another
Interassay vs intra-assay reproducibility
Quality Control Materials
drawn from a pool either from human or animal source
marketed commercially or may be prepared in the laboratory; Freeze-dried for long term stability
2 levels : “normal range”
“abnormal range”
may be obtained either “assayed” or “non-assayed”
Uses of quality control data
To identify if:
1. The assay is malfunctioning & no data obtained are reliable.
2. A problem with the assay is developing and needs to be corrected
1. (2S) One control value exceeds
± 2sd from the mean
2. (3S) One control value exceeds
± 3sd from the mean
Levy-Jennings Plot (Shewhart Plot)
Trend analysis of quality control data
Westgard Rules for Quality Control
A set of criteria developed to improve quality of monitoring, decrease subjectivity in data analysis, and provide some help in troubleshooting.
3. 2 (2S) Two consecutive control values exceed the same limit, either ± 2sd
4. R (4S) The numerical difference between two control values within the same run exceeds 4sd
5. 4 (1S) Four consecutive values (control) exceed either ± 1sd
6. 10 (x) Ten consecutive results all lie on the same side of the mean
Relationship between accuracy and precision
The Levy – Jennings Plot
Use of the Westgard rules
Violations of the 1 (2S) and 1 (3S) Westgard rules
Violation of the R (4S) Westgard rule.
Violations of the 2 (2S) and 4 (1S)
Westgard rules
Violation of the 10 () Westgard rule
Laboratory Quality
Control
An Overview
Definitions (1)
Quality Control - QC refers to the measures that must be included
during each assay run to verify that the test is working properly.
Quality Assurance - QA is defined as the overall program that
ensures that the final results reported by the laboratory are correct.
“The aim of quality control is simply to ensure that the results
generated by the test are correct. However, quality assurance is
concerned with much more: that the right test is carried out on the right
specimen, and that the right result and right interpretation is delivered
to the right person at the right time”
Definitions (2)
Quality Assessment - quality assessment (also known as
proficiency testing) is a means to determine the quality of
the results generated by the laboratory. Quality assessment
is a challenge to the effectiveness of the QA and QC
programs.
Quality Assessment may be external or internal, examples
of external programs include NEQAS, HKMTA, and Q-
probes.
Variables that affect the quality of results
The educational background and training of the
laboratory personnel
The condition of the specimens
The controls used in the test runs
Reagents
Equipment
The interpretation of the results
The transcription of results
The reporting of results
Errors in measurement
True value - this is an ideal concept which cannot be
achieved.
Accepted true value - the value approximating the
true value, the difference between the two values is
negligible.
Error - the discrepancy between the result of a
measurement and the true (or accepted true value).
Sources of error
Input data required - such as standards used, calibration values, and
values of physical constants.
Inherent characteristics of the quantity being measured - e.g. CFT
and HAI titre.
Instruments used - accuracy, repeatability.
Observer fallibility - reading errors, blunders, equipment selection,
analysis and computation errors.
Environment - any external influences affecting the measurement.
Theory assumed - validity of mathematical methods and
approximations.
Random Error
An error which varies in an unpredictable manner, in magnitude
and sign, when a large number of measurements of the same
quantity are made under effectively identical conditions.
Random errors create a characteristic spread of results for any test
method and cannot be accounted for by applying corrections.
Random errors are difficult to eliminate but repetition reduces the
influences of random errors.
Examples of random errors include errors in pipetting and changes
in incubation period. Random errors can be minimized by training,
supervision and adherence to standard operating procedures.
Random Errors
x
x x
x x
True x x x x
Value x x x
x x x
x
x
x
Systematic Error
An error which, in the course of a number of measurements of
the same value of a given quantity, remains constant when
measurements are made under the same conditions, or varies
according to a definite law when conditions change.
Systematic errors create a characteristic bias in the test results
and can be accounted for by applying a correction.
Systematic errors may be induced by factors such as variations in
incubation temperature, blockage of plate washer, change in the
reagent batch or modifications in testing method.
Systematic Errors
x
x x x x x x x
True x
Value
Internal Quality Control Program for Serological Testing
An internal quality control program depend on the use of
internal quality control (IQC) specimens, Shewhart
Control Charts, and the use of statistical methods for
interpretation.
Internal Quality Control Specimens
IQC specimens comprises either (1) in-house patient sera
(single or pooled clinical samples), or (2) international
serum standards with values within each clinically
significant ranges.
Shewhart Control Charts
A Shewhart Control Chart depend on the use of IQC specimens and is
developed in the following manner:-
Put up the IQC specimen for at least 20 or more assay runs and record
down the O.D./cut-off value or antibody titre (whichever is applicable).
Calculate the mean and standard deviations (s.d.)
Make a plot with the assay run on the x-axis, and O.D./cut-off or
antibody titre on the y axis.
Draw the following lines across the y-axis: mean, -3, -2, -2, 1, 2, and 3
s.d.
Plot the O.D./cut-off obtained for the IQC specimen for subsequent assay
runs
Major events such as changes in the batch no. of the kit and instruments
used should be recorded on the chart.
Westgard rules
The formulation of Westgard rules were based on statistical
methods. Westgard rules are commonly used to analyse data in
Shewhart control charts.
Westgard rules are used to define specific performance limits for a
particular assay and can be use to detect both random and systematic
errors.
There are six commonly used Westgard rules of which three are
warning rules and the other three mandatory rules.
The violation of warning rules should trigger a review of test
procedures, reagent performance and equipment calibration.
The violation of mandatory rules should result in the rejection of the
results obtained with patients’ serum samples in that assay.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Shewhart Chart
+3 sd
-3 sd
+2 sd
-2 sd
-1 sd
+1 sd
VZV IgG ELISA: Target Value = 49 U/ml
An
tibo
dy U
nits
Target value
Assay Run
Warning rules
Warning 12SD : It is violated if the IQC value exceeds the
mean by 2SD. It is an event likely to occur normally in less
than 5% of cases.
Warning 22SD : It detects systematic errors and is violated
when two consecutive IQC values exceed the mean on the
same side of the mean by 2SD.
Warning 41SD : It is violated if four consecutive IQC values
exceed the same limit (mean 1SD) and this may indicate the
need to perform instrument maintenance or reagent calibration.
Mandatory rules
Mandatory 13SD : It is violated when the IQC value exceeds
the mean by 3SD. The assay run is regarded as out of control.
Mandatory R4SD : It is only applied when the IQC is tested in
duplicate. This rule is violated when the difference in SD
between the duplicates exceeds 4SD.
Mandatory 10x : This rule is violated when the last 10
consecutive IQC values are on the same side of the mean or
target value.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Westgard Rules: 1 3SD
+3 sd
-3 sd
+2 sd
-2 sd
-1 sd
+1 sd
VZV IgG ELISA: Target Value = 49 U/ml
An
tibo
dy U
nits
Target value
Assay Run
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Westgard Rules: 10X
+3 sd
-3 sd
+2 sd
-2 sd
-1 sd
+1 sd
VZV IgG ELISA: Target Value = 49 U/ml
An
tibo
dy U
nits
Target value
Assay Run
Follow-up action in the event of a violation
There are three options as to the action to be taken in the event of a
violation of a Westgard rule:
Accept the test run in its entirety - this usually applies when
only a warning rule is violated.
Reject the whole test run - this applies only when a
mandatory rule is violated.
Enlarge the greyzone and thus re-test range for that particular
assay run - this option can be considered in the event of a
violation of either a warning or mandatory rule.