Upload
guri
View
19
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Quality Inquiry: User Perspectives on Virtual Reference Practice. Marie L. Radford , Ph.D. , Associate Professor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist OCLC ASIS&T 2009 Annual Meeting November 6-11. 2009 Vancouver, BC. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Quality Inquiry: User Perspectives on Virtual Reference Practice
Marie L. Radford, Ph.D. , Associate ProfessorRutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D., Senior Research ScientistOCLC
ASIS&T 2009 Annual MeetingNovember 6-11. 2009 Vancouver, BC
Libraries Today – Rapid Change
• Vying for information seekers’ attention
• Must re-engineer to accommodate users’ workflows & habits
Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, & Librarian Perspectives
IMLS funded project with 4 phases:Focus group interviewsTranscript analysis (850)Online surveys – 496 Total
175 VRS librarians, 184 VRS non-users, 137 VRS users
Telephone interviews - 283 Total100 VRS librarians, 107 VRS non-users, 76 VRS users
Online Surveys
•Descriptive statistical analysis– Demographic– Multiple-choice– Likert-type
•Qualitative analysis– Open-ended – 2 critical incident (CI) questions
•Adults & Net Gen
The Net Generation
•Born 1979 - 1994• Millennials• EchoBoomers• Gen Y
•Socially networked environment •Different communication & information-seeking behaviors
VRS User Demographics (N=137)
Net Gen (N=49)•Female (51%, 25)•19-28 years old
(47%, 23)•Caucasian (67%, 33)
Adult, 29+ (N=88)•Female (68%, 60)•36-45 years old
(38%, 33)•Caucasian (84%, 74)
"The probability that I will use reference services again is"
82%
92%
76788082848688909294
Net Gen VRS Users Adult VRS Users
Excellent orVery Good
VRS Users Likely to be Repeat Users Net Gens (N=49) Adults (N=88)
Chat Least Intimidating to VRS Users Net Gens (N=49) Adults (N=88)
"I am least intimidated by"
04%14%
6%
76%
016%
5%
33%
47%
01020304050607080
FtF Phone Email Text Chat
Net GenVRS Users
Adult VRSUsers
Recommendation Important to VRS UsersNet Gens (N=49)
• Used VRS because recommended
• Recommended VRS more than adults
What Attracts Users to VRS? Users (N=137)
•Convenience, Convenience, Convenience–Available 24/7 •Working from home• Nights or weekends
– Immediate answers – Lack of cost – Efficient
•Less intimidating
Why Users Don’t Always Choose VRS?Net Gens (N=49)
• Unhelpful answers• Non-subject specialists• Slow connections• Scripted messages• Cold environment
What Would Attract Users to VRS?Net Gens (N=49)
•Faster & easier software•Personalized interface•Reliable co-browsing•More service hours•Kiosk & cybercafe access•Experienced, tech-savvy librarians
What We Learned
• FtF & VRS Users want– Extended hours of service – Access to electronic
information– Interact w/ friendly
librarians – Relationships with
librarians
What We Can Do
• Encourage service use– Creative marketing • Promote full range of
options• Reassure young people VRS
is safe
– Build positive relationships whether FtF, phone, or online
End Notes• This is one of the outcomes from the project
Seeking Synchronicity: Evaluating Virtual Reference Services from User, Non-User, and Librarian Perspectives
• Funded by IMLS, Rutgers University, & OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
• Special thanks to Co- PI, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist, OCLC
• Project web site: http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/synchronicity/