Upload
yepa
View
47
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Ragnar Arnason Community Fisheries Management What structure and why? Fame workshop on New Developments in Rights-based Fisheries Management Esbjerg, August 30-31 2005. Subject of this lecture. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Ragnar ArnasonRagnar Arnason
Community Fisheries Community Fisheries ManagementManagement
What structure and why?What structure and why?
Fame workshop onFame workshop on New Developments in Rights-based Fisheries ManagementNew Developments in Rights-based Fisheries Management
Esbjerg, August 30-31 2005Esbjerg, August 30-31 2005
Subject of this lectureSubject of this lecture
Explore the conditions under which Explore the conditions under which community fishing rights will lead to community fishing rights will lead to
economically efficient fisheries economically efficient fisheries managementmanagement
I. BackgroundI. Background
Fisheries management is neededFisheries management is needed
• Research has determined two classes of Research has determined two classes of management methods that can workmanagement methods that can work
(i) Property rights regimes (widely applied)(i) Property rights regimes (widely applied)(ii) Taxes (apparently not been applied)(ii) Taxes (apparently not been applied)
• Fisheries are subject to well known Fisheries are subject to well known problems of economic inefficiencyproblems of economic inefficiency
Key Property Rights SystemsKey Property Rights Systems
1.1. Sole ownershipSole ownership2.2. TURFsTURFs3.3. IQs and ITQsIQs and ITQs4.4. Community rightsCommunity rights
Note: First three are Note: First three are individual rightsindividual rights but the but the fourth is a fourth is a collective rightcollective right
ExperienceExperience• Sole ownership is extremely rare – but Sole ownership is extremely rare – but
works!works!• TURFs more common - work!TURFs more common - work!• IQs fairly common - work to a degreeIQs fairly common - work to a degree• ITQs becoming increasingly common ITQs becoming increasingly common (over (over
10% of the global catch is taken under ITQs)10% of the global catch is taken under ITQs) - work! - work!
So, basically, individual property rights work!So, basically, individual property rights work!
Unfortunately:Unfortunately:Individual property rights cannot be Individual property rights cannot be
applied to all fisheriesapplied to all fisheries
• Sole ownershipSole ownership– Socio-political problemsSocio-political problems
• TURFsTURFs– Technical problems (exclusivity)Technical problems (exclusivity)
• ITQsITQs– Technical problems (enforcement)Technical problems (enforcement)– Socio-political problemsSocio-political problems
Therefore attention has beenTherefore attention has been drawn to drawn to
collective property rightscollective property rights
Community fishing rightsCommunity fishing rights
in particular.....in particular.....
What areWhat arecommunity fishing rights?community fishing rights?
• Fishing rights granted collectively to a Fishing rights granted collectively to a group of agentsgroup of agents
• These rights constitute a property rightThese rights constitute a property right• It gives the group the authority toIt gives the group the authority to
– Defend these rights against outsidersDefend these rights against outsiders– Conduct internal fisheries managementConduct internal fisheries management
Note: Community fishing rights Note: Community fishing rights do notdo not constitute constitute a fisheries management systema fisheries management system
RationaleRationale1.1. Enhances economic efficiency in fishingEnhances economic efficiency in fishing
– Fisheries managementFisheries management– EnforcementEnforcement
2.2. Socio-politically more appropriateSocio-politically more appropriate– More in accordance with tradition - naturalMore in accordance with tradition - natural– More fair - communities can control their own More fair - communities can control their own
destinydestiny3.3. Politically expedientPolitically expedient
– Relieves the government of a difficult problemRelieves the government of a difficult problem
Here only concerned with rationale no. 1Here only concerned with rationale no. 1
Why should community fishing Why should community fishing rights promote efficiency?rights promote efficiency?
1.1. In fisheries managementIn fisheries management– Better informationBetter information– More appropriate incentivesMore appropriate incentives
2.2. In fisheries enforcementIn fisheries enforcement– Better informationBetter information– More appropriate incentivesMore appropriate incentives– More powerful sanctionsMore powerful sanctions
Experience with Experience with community fisheries management community fisheries management
1.1. Empirical:Empirical:– Not much evidenceNot much evidence– Primarily anthropological and social evidence Primarily anthropological and social evidence
(not very hard data)(not very hard data)– Mixed outcomes – some fairly good, some Mixed outcomes – some fairly good, some
worse worse (Note: Tend not to observe the really bad ones)(Note: Tend not to observe the really bad ones)
2.2. ExperimentalExperimental– Mixed outcomesMixed outcomes
Outcomes of community fisheries Outcomes of community fisheries management seem to depend very much management seem to depend very much
on the particular situationon the particular situation
Crucial to adopt the appropriate Crucial to adopt the appropriate community design community design !!
So:So:
II. Design PrinciplesII. Design Principles
Conditions that contribute to efficient Conditions that contribute to efficient community fisheries managementcommunity fisheries management
High quality property rightHigh quality property right
1.1. SecuritySecurity2.2. ExclusivityExclusivity3.3. PermanencePermanence4.4. TransferabilityTransferability
Property rights attributes Property rights attributes [0,1][0,1]
High quality High quality Each attribute close to Each attribute close to 11
Perfect and actual property rightsPerfect and actual property rights
Actual property right
SecuritySecurity
ExclusivityExclusivity
PermanencePermanence
TransferabilityTransferabilityPerfect property right
TheoremTheorem(not proven in the paper)(not proven in the paper)
The lower the value of the property right The lower the value of the property right the less efficient is the associated the less efficient is the associated
economic activityeconomic activity
Community property rights should Community property rights should be as high quality as possible!be as high quality as possible!
Inclusive membershipInclusive membership
This means:This means:1.1. No outsiders at the beginningNo outsiders at the beginning2.2. No-one can leave to become an No-one can leave to become an
independent operator in the fisheryindependent operator in the fishery
(I.e. no-one can operate outside the (I.e. no-one can operate outside the community rules)community rules)
TheoremTheoremIf community management is successful, If community management is successful,
individual fishers will benefit from leavingindividual fishers will benefit from leaving- provided they can do so with impunity- provided they can do so with impunity
Fisheries communities should be Fisheries communities should be inclusiveinclusive
Homogeneous membershipHomogeneous membership
TheoremTheoremIf fishing community members are not If fishing community members are not
identical, bargaining identical, bargaining will notwill not lead to the lead to the most efficient fisherymost efficient fishery
- unless (perhaps) benefits are transferable- unless (perhaps) benefits are transferable
1.1. The composition of the fisheries community The composition of the fisheries community should be as homogeneous as possibleshould be as homogeneous as possible
2.2. I should only include fishermen – not other I should only include fishermen – not other professions or interestsprofessions or interests
3.3. It should preferably only include owners of It should preferably only include owners of fishing capital – not fishing labourfishing capital – not fishing labour
This implies:This implies:
Pay-offs as sharesPay-offs as shares
TheoremTheoremIf fishing community members receive benefits If fishing community members receive benefits
that are increasing in aggregate benefitsthat are increasing in aggregate benefits
(1) The bargaining solution is efficient!(1) The bargaining solution is efficient! (2) The competitive solution is efficient!(2) The competitive solution is efficient!
If at all possible, the fishing community should If at all possible, the fishing community should be set up so that each member’s benefits are an be set up so that each member’s benefits are an increasing function of aggregate benefitsincreasing function of aggregate benefits
This suggestsThis suggests
(1) Limited companies have this property(1) Limited companies have this property(2) Within-community ITQs have this propety(2) Within-community ITQs have this propety
NoteNote
Fishing CommunityFishing Community Practical design guidancePractical design guidance
- Summary -- Summary -1.1. The community rights should be as high The community rights should be as high
quality as possiblequality as possible2.2. The community should be inclusive – i.e. The community should be inclusive – i.e.
include all fishers in the areainclude all fishers in the area3.3. The community should have as The community should have as
homgeneous membership as possiblehomgeneous membership as possible4.4. Each membes pay-off should be Each membes pay-off should be
increasing in the aggregate pay-offincreasing in the aggregate pay-off
EndEnd