39
Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073: SUR gery TIME 24 Nov 2011 Investigators & site staff training

Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal

cell carcinoma.

EORTC study 30073: SURgery TIME

24 Nov 2011

Investigators & site staff training

Page 2: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Overview of presentation

Scientific background and protocol for EORTC study 30073

Tips for organizing the randomization timeline

Operational aspects (translational research logistics, site authorization, interactions with centers)

Page 3: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Participating European sites

Up to 50 sites in Europe

Italy (4)

706 – Brausi 796 – Sternberg

720 – Gontero 797 – Berruti

Belgium (6)

101 – Van Velthoven

104 – Rottey

130 – D’Hondt 1217 – Van Renterghem

150 – Carpentier 1257 – Debruyne

The Netherlands (9)22 – Oddens 335 – De Jong

301 – Bex 324 – Soetekouw

304 – Mulders 342 – Laguna

306 – Boeken Kruger …

308 – Van Moorselaar

310 – Osanto

UK (16)601 – Sim 848 – Savage xxx - Fife

606 – Mead xxx – Mc Laren

610 – Hawkins xxx – Boleti

651 – Kynaston xxx – Farrugia

664 – Bahl xxx – Lydon

669 – Wagstaff xxx – Sheehan

671 – Maraveyas xxx – Newman

7120 – Sundaram …

Page 4: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Participating non-European sites

7 sites outside Europe

Canada (7)754 – Jewett

876 – Reaume

9373 – Wood

181 – Tanguay

9374 –Black

1785 - Lattouf

Page 5: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Scientific background and protocol for EORTC study 30073

Page 6: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Background (1)

• The effective therapy with a high probability of cure is surgical removal of the primary tumor

• Unfortunately, up to 30 % of all patients with renal cell carcinoma have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis with the primary tumor in situ

Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) disease confined to the

kidney

• In exceptional cases pats will benefit from surgery multimodality management that comprises systemic therapy

• In highly selected patients, a combined analysis of both trials demonstrated a survival advantage for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by interferon with a median survival of 13.6 months versus 7.8 months for interferon therapy alone.

Patients with primary

metastatic RCC and multiple non-

resectable metastases

Renal cell cancer is the 7th most frequent cancer and accounts for 2-3 % of all new cancer cases worldwide.

Page 7: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Background (2)

• Criteria for CN: candidate for systemic therapy, significant tumor burden of the primary tumor, absence of significant comorbidity, absence of central nervous system metastasis and low risk of surgical morbidity, performance status and early progressive disease .

• Sunitinib was registered in the US and Europe in 2007 for the treatment of metastatic RCC and became the approved first-line therapy.

• Due to its pharmacodynamics and safety profile sunitinib can be administered in close timing with surgery and is therefore the first-line drug of choice for a combination with surgery

Patients with primary

metastatic RCC and multiple

non-resectable metastases

(con’t)

Page 8: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Objectives and End-points

Principal objective

•To investigate whether the sequence of the nephrectomy in patients who receive sunitinib has an effect on patient outcome.

Secondary endpoin

ts

• Overall survival • Morbidity • Overall response to treatment in the deferred nephrectomy arm including the proportion

of patients who become unresectable• Effect of nephrectomy on early progression in both arms

Primary endpoin

t

• Overall progression free survival. Progression will be defined according to the "RECIST" 1.1 criteria.

Page 9: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Eligibility Criteria (1)

Histologically confirmed metastatic Renal Cell Cancer of clear-cell subtype (tru-cut biopsy) with a resectable asymptomatic in situ primary.

Metastatic RCC: multiple distant lesions at one site mean that patient will not be eligible Resectable: primary tumor must be resectable and resectability not be doubtful at entry

Measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.

Prior therapies Prior systemic therapies for mRCC

Local radiotherapy for bone lesions

Concomitant medications investigational/systemic therapies for mRCC

Systemic corticosteroids and/or other immunotherapies

Sunitinib as background therapy

Disease Status

Page 10: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Eligibility Criteria (2)

Age ≥ 18 years

Life expectancy > 3 months

WHO PS 0 or 1

Adequate bone marrow, coagulation, hepatic & renal function

No more than 3 surgical risk factors

Normal cardiac function (LVEF, ECG).

No serious cardiac illness within the past 12 months (myocardial infarction and/or (un)treatable angina pectoris not responding to treatment)

Uncontrolled HTA Clinical signs of CNS

Pulmonary disease

Patient Status

Page 11: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Eligibility Criteria (3)

Surgical risk factors :

serum albumin CTCAE v4.0 grade 2 or worse (< 3.0 g/dl)

serum LDH > 1.5 x UNL

liver metastases

symptoms at presentation due to mestastases

retroperitoneal lymph node involvement

supra-diaphragmatic lymph node involvement

clinical stage T3 or T4

Patients with active or uncontrolled infections or with serious illnesses, malabsorption syndrome or medical conditions (chronic alcohol abuse, hepatitis, HIV and/or cirrhosis…)

Patient Status (con’t)

Page 12: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Eligibility Criteria (4)

Other malignancies history of malignancies other than RCC within the past five years (except: basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the

skin, in situ carcinoma of the cervix, resected incidental prostate cancer staged pT2 with Gleason Score 6 and postoperative PSA < 0.5 ng/ml).

Patients with any history of malignancies who are disease-free for more than 5 years

Contraception Women must be post-menopausal with a total cessation of menses of >1 year Women of childbearing potential must not be pregnant (negative serum pregnancy test at entry) or lactating; and

must agree to use effective contraceptive methods (with a documented failure rate < 1% e.g.; vasectomized partner sterile prior to trial entry and sole sexual partner or double-barrier contraception) from 2 weeks before to enrollment. The duration of the contraception will depend on the treatment that patient will receive

Written informed consent

Participation in the translational research program Patients will be eligible for the translational research program if they are eligible for the clinical trial and have given

their written informed consent to participate in this program. If patient refuses to take part in the translational research project, patient remains eligible for the clinical trial.

Informed consent

Page 13: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Trial Design

458 eligible patients

Immediate Nephrectomy

Nephrectomy Sunitinib

Deferred nephrectomySunitinib Nephrectomy Sunitinib

R

Page 14: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Treatment Schedule (1)

Immediate nephrectomy arm

Cycle 1 (6 wk) Cycle 2 (6 wk)

4 weeks of sunitinib

2 weeks break

Progression status at week 16

Progression status every 12 weeks

Cycle 3 (6 wk) Cycle 4 (6 wk)

Progression status at week 28

NE

PH

RE

CT

OM

Y

4 weeks rest after nephrectomy

Sunitinib until withdrawal criterion

In both arms, the interval between the randomization and the start of treatment should not exceed 48 hours.

Page 15: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Treatment Schedule (2)

Deferred nephrectomy arm

Sunitinib until withdrawal criterion

NE

PH

RE

CT

OM

Y

4 weeks of sunitinib

2 weeks break

Cycle 1 (6 wk) Cycle 2 (6 wk) Cycle 3 (4 wk)

Progression status at week 28

Cycle 4 (6 wk) Cycle 5 (6 wk)

4 weeks rest after nephrectomy

Progression status every 12 weeks

Progression status at week 16

Sunitinib will stop the day before surgery (# end week 4)

Criteria for surgery ■ Non systemic progressive disease (RECIST 1.1 criteria).

■ Recovery from toxicity due to sunitinib specifically interfering with surgery.

■ Patients must not have more than 3 surgical risk factors.

Page 16: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Tips for organizing the randomization timeline for centres with a waiting list (1)

Based on experience from the NKI

• At the first contact with the patient crudely check general eligibility, inform about the trial and possible inclusion

• place patient on the waiting list for surgery at the time of first contact, except if patient definitely refuses to participate

• once the potential date for surgery is known, randomization can be planned 48 hours in advance

• instruct planning staff not to communicate the potential date for surgery directly to the patient as this may cause misunderstanding.It should be used for internal communication and planning of the randomization date.

Page 17: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Tips for organizing the randomization timeline for centres with a waiting list (2)

• Inform the patient as early as possible about the date of randomization. Explain, that admission for surgery or start of medical treatment will take place within 48 hours of randomization. This will allow the patient to prepare well in advance for the two options depending on randomization. Don’t wait with this information until randomization as an admission within 48 hours may completely surprise the patient.

• perform new CT scans, tru-cut biopsies and other eligibility checks if required in the waiting time. Don’t do this first and plan the patient subsequently if your centre has a long waiting time for surgery. If the patient turns out not to be eligible, it is easier to cancel the planning

Page 18: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Tips for organizing the randomization timeline for centres with a waiting list (3)

• Nevertheless, if at all possible, the waiting time should not be too long as we discovered that patients experience it as a waste of time if they randomize for sunitinib first. In their view they could have started right away in retrospect if only it would have been known earlier. Again, good communication is essential: Patients should be informed that metastatic RCC is not an emergency

Page 19: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Tips for organizing the randomization timeline for centres with a waiting list (4)

Regarding the 50 % chance of loosing surgery time there are several options to follow:

• At the NKI we have a pool of planned alternative patients. There are patients who do not mind to be informed at short notice in exchange for a chance to shorten the waiting time.

• Use of ‘trial slots’.

• Performing surgery after the regular program as an ‘emergency’

Page 20: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Treatment and Schedule modifications (1)

1. PRE-SURGICAL PERIOD

Dose and schedule modifications of sunitinib will follow the standard recommendations of the drug and the decision will be based on the investigator's judgment.

2. SURGICAL PERIOD

Immediate nephrectomy arm

Given the primary endpoint, if the interval from baseline disease assessment to surgery date exceeds 4 weeks, re-staging of the disease should be performed again.

Page 21: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Treatment and Schedule modifications (1)

Deferred nephrectomy arm

If during the course of cycle 3, a patient has to interrupt sunitinib due to a side effect, the disease assessment must be performed after recovery as close as possible to surgery.

If the recovery period leads to a delay in surgery for > 2 weeks compared to the initially scheduled date, the patient will be taken off protocol treatment but should continue to be followed for protocol endpoints (progression and survival).

In case of severe hematuria necessitating intervention during the three pre-surgical courses, sunitinib must be stopped temporarily.

In case of an overdose of sunitinib, surgery should be delayed by 3 days according to the half life of the active metabolite.

3. POST-SURGICAL PERIOD

In both arms

If the delay > 4 wk recovery period the patient will not be eligible for evaluation of the primary endpoint, but will be followed for evaluation of secondary endpoints.

Page 22: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Treatment Withdrawal Criteria

Withdrawal criteria are defined as:

Disease progression

Occurrence of second malignancy

Unacceptable toxicity based on the investigator's judgment.

Patient decision.

In case of withdraw due to other reason than disease progression:

■ Pats should not receive any other cancer treatment before their disease progresses, unless

this is clearly not in the best interest of the patient.

■ Follow up must be continued for progression and survival as per protocol

Page 23: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Clinical Evaluation (1)

• Biopsy: if the histological diagnosis of “clear-cell” subtype is not established patients need to undergo a transcutaneous tru-cut needle biopsy of the primary tumor.

Before randomization

• Radiological assessment includes the primary tumor and the metastases according to RECIST 1.1 criteria

Within 4 wks prior to random.

• Medical history• WHO PS, blood pressure, pulse rate, body weight and height• Cancer signs and symptoms• Assessment of adverse events (CTCAE 4.0)• LVEF, 12-lead ECG • Serum pregnancy test• Complete blood counts & Serum chemistry

Within 2 wks prior to random

Page 24: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Clinical Evaluation (2)

Before random.

Post surgical period Fol.up weekly if discontinue

due tox.

Fol. up until PD

after PDQ 12 weeks for survival4 wks post

surg.week 16 Week 28 After week

28

Q 12 wks

Medical history

WHO PS, BP, PR, W, H

Cancer signs and symptoms

Adverse events

Cardiac function

Serum pregnancy test

Hematology (2)

Serum chemistry (3)

Radiological assessment (RECIST 1.1)

(4 wks)

(Re-staging)

(Q 12 wk)

Survival status

Immediate nephrectomy arm

Page 25: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Clinical Evaluation (3)

Deferred nephrectomy arm

Before random.

Pre-surgical period Post surgical period Fol.up weekly if discontinue

due tox.

Fol. up until PD

after PDQ 12

weeks for survival

Week 4 Week 16 Week 20 Week 28 Week 32 After week 28,

Q 12 wks

Medical history

WHO PS, BP, PR, W, H

Cancer signs and symptoms

Adverse events

Cardiac function

Serum pregnancy test

Hematology (2),

Serum chemistry(3)

Radiological assessment (RECIST 1.1)

(4 wks)

(Re-staging)

(Q 12 wk)

Survival status

Page 26: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Clinical Evaluation (4)

Follow ups must still be provided for the study endpoints (progression free survival and overall survival).

In addition, for patients that withdraw due to adverse event, follow up for adverse event will continue on a weekly basis until any associated adverse event has resolved or clinical judgment deems necessary. It will consist of:

Medical examination

Assessment of adverse events

Complete blood counts, if needed

Serum chemistry, if needed

Cardiac function, if needed

Other tests, if needed

In both arms, for the patients who discontinue treatment in absence of progression:

Page 27: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Criteria for Evaluation (1)RECIST 1.1

Measurable disease: presence of at least one measurable lesion. If the measurable disease is restricted to a solitary lesion, its neoplastic nature should be confirmed by cytology/histology

Page 28: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Criteria for Evaluation (2)RECIST 1.1

Measurable lesionTumor lesions: that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter to be recorded) as ≥ 20 mm with chest x-ray, and as ≥ 10 mm with CT scan or clinical examination [using calipers].

Bone lesions: are considered measurable only if assessed by CT scan and have an identifiable soft tissue component that meets these requirements (soft tissue component > 10 mm by CT scan).

Malignant lymph nodes: must be ≥ 15 mm in the short axis to be considered measurable; only the short axis will be measured and followed. All tumor measurements must be recorded in millimeters (or decimal fractions of centimeters) by use of a ruler or calipers

Tumor lesions situated in a previously irradiated area, or in an area subjected to other loco-regional therapy: are usually not considered measurable unless there has been demonstrated progression in the lesion.

Page 29: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Criteria for Evaluation (3)RECIST 1.1

All other lesions (or sites of disease), including small lesions

Bone lesions without a measurable soft tissue component

leptomeningeal disease, ascites, pleural/pericardial effusions, lymphangitis cutis/pulmonis, inflammatory breast disease, lymphangitic involvement of lung or skin and abdominal masses followed by clinical examination.

Nodes that have a short axis <10 mm at baseline are considered non-pathological and should not be recorded or followed.

Non Measurable lesions

Page 30: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Criteria for Evaluation (4)RECIST 1.1

Target and non target lesions

Target lesion (TL)

• Up to a maximum of 5 lesions (maximum of 2 lesions per organ) • size (lesions with the longest diameter), representative of all involved organs, reproducible for repeated measurements. • Pathological nodes: short axis of ≥ 15 mm by CT scan (baseline sum). •Baseline Sum of TL= longest diameter of tumor lesions + short axis of lymph nodes

Non target lesion (NTL)

• All non-measurable lesions (or sites of disease) including :pathological nodes (those with short axis ≥ 10 mm but < 15 mm)• Any measurable lesions over and above those listed as target lesions are considered non-target lesions.• These lesions should be noted at baseline and should be followed as “present” or “absent”.

Page 31: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Criteria for Evaluation (5)RECIST 1.1

Evaluation of Response

Complete Response (CR)

•Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. •Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures < 10mm•Tumor markers must have normalized .•Residual lesions (other than nodes < 10 mm) thought to be non-malignant should be further investigated (by cytology or PET scans) before CR can be accepted.

Partial Response (PR) • At least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. • Non target lesions must be non-PD.

Stable Disease (SD) Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters on study.

Page 32: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Criteria for Evaluation (6)RECIST 1.1

Evaluation of ResponseProgressive Disease (PD)

at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) AND an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm.

Appearance of new lesions will also constitute PD (including lesions in previously unassessed areas).

In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression of non-target disease may be accepted as evidence of disease progression

If the evidence of PD is equivocal (target or non-target), treatment may continue until the next assessment, but on further documentation, the earlier date must be used

Page 33: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Criteria for Evaluation (7)RECIST 1.1

Evaluation of response to take into account:

Response of target lesions

Response of non target lesions

Presence of new lesions

Page 34: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Disease Evaluation criteria (8) RECIST 1.1

Best Overall Response Evaluation

Target Lesions

Non-Target Lesions

New Lesions

Overall Response

CR CR No CR

CR SD No PR

PR Not PD No PR

SD Not PD No SD

PD Any Yes or No PD

Any PD Yes or No PD

Any Any Yes PD

Page 35: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Translational research: patient eligibility

Eligible patient

Objectives TR:1. Identify possible molecular markers that correlate with

response, prognosis and overall survival

Written consent for TRNo consent for TR

Eligible for study Eligible for study and TR

Page 36: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Translational Research

Before random.

During treatment

Week 16 Surgery 6 mo. After random

Paraffin embedded tumor block

♦1

(Tru-cut biopsy)

♦2

(specimen from surgery)

Fresh frozen tissue

♦1

(Tru-cut biopsy)

♦2

(specimen from surgery)

Blood sample 10 ml

♦ ♦ ♦

1. In the immediate nephrectomy arm: native tumor tissue will be obtained from nephrectomy specimen.

2. In deferred surgery arm: for those patients who will not undergo surgery, it’s strongly recommended to perform a transcutaneous tru-cut needle biopsy of the primary tumor

Page 37: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Preparation and storage TR samples (1)

1) Blood samples

Centrifugation at 2000 g; 10 minT = Room temperature

3 storage tubes1 ml serum/tube

Label: Protocol 30073Subject seqidSample date; Serum

10 mlblood

At baselineAt surgeryAt 6 months

Freeze and

store at -80°C

30-60 min

Room temp

Page 38: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Preparation and storage TR samples (2)

3 biopsies

2) Tissue samplesBiopsy samples

Room temp 30 minutes max

Pathology department

Biopsies 1/tube in storage tube (3ml)

Label: Protocol 30073Subject seqidSample date; paraffin/frozen tissueLocal inventory code

1 formaldehyde fixed paraffinTumor biopsy (at least)

Freeze and store at -80°C

Store at Room temp

Page 39: Randomized Phase III trial comparing immediate versus deferred nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. EORTC study 30073:

Preparation and storage TR samples (3)

2) Tissue samples

Blocks or punch biopsies8/tube in storage tubes (3ml)

Label: Protocol 30073Subject seqidSample date; paraffin/frozen tissueLocal inventory code

Nephrectomy samplesStore at Room temp

1 formaldehyde fixed paraffinTumor block (at least)

Room temp 30 minutes max

Freeze and store at -80°C

Pathology department