Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RAPA | 2018 Annual Conference
October 21st – 23rd, 2018
Agenda
8:30 – 9:00 Welcome and Introductions
9:00 – 10:00 An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence
10:00 – 10:30 Break
10:30 – 11:30 Claims: Reviewing the Current Ecosystem& Identifying
Priorities for Improvement.
11:30 – 12:30 Total Line/Jumbo – Is There a Problem to be Solved?
12:30 – 1:45 Lunch
1:45 – 5:30 Roundtable Session
Do Old Dogs Need to Lean New Tricks or Do New Dog Need to Learn
Old Tricks?
Design Thinking Sprint: The Puzzle Project
4:00 – 4:30 Break
Accelerated Underwriting
5:30 Adjourn Day 1
7:00 Cocktail Reception and Dinner
Antitrust StatementThe Association makes no warranties as to the accuracy of the information contained in discussion forums, meeting minutes or presenter materials. The posting of messages, meeting minutes or presentation materials does not constitute knowledge, endorsement or approval by the Association, nor do we accept any liability for the content of any posting. Individuals using these discussion forums do so at their own risk and shall also remain individually responsible for their actions and statements in using these discussion forums. Because the Association is committed to adhering strictly to the United States and Canada antitrust, copyright, trademark, securities and other federal statutes, as well as state or provincial common laws covering libel, slander, defamation, false advertising, invasion of privacy and violations of the rights of publicity, we strongly discourage users of our discussion forums or attendees of our meetings from verbally stating or writing anything that (1) sets or controls prices or terms of products or services and the manners in which products or services are sold; (2) violates the proprietary or personal rights of others; or (3) constitutes an advertisement. Your use of or participation in Association discussion forums or meetings is acknowledgement of your agreement with the above and your promise to use these forums in a professional and courteous manner.
Welcome to New Orleans (or-lins)
Originally inhabited by the Chitimacha tribe, New Orleans was founded in 1718 by the French as La
Nouvelle-Orléans, and named in honor of the Regent of France, Philip II, Duke of Orléans. It was sold to
the U.S. in the historical Louisiana Purchase in1803, and migrated by Americans, French, Creoles,
Africans, Irish, Germans, and Italians.
New Or-lins 10 interesting facts
10. Louisiana is broken into 5 subdivisions called parishes(not counties) - Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard,
and St. Tammy.
9. The city was developed in a rectangle block known as the French Quarter, and well known for Cajun style culinary
dishes. Gumbo anyone?
8. New Orleans is NOT the home of the first Mardi Gras celebration in the United States. The first was in Mobile, Alabama.
Really??
7. Hurricane Katrina in 2005 – levee systems failed and 80% of the city flooded. More than 1,500 died and many were
permanently displaced.
6. The New Orleans Saints won their only Super Bowl appearance in 2010. Five years after the Hurricane Katrina
disaster. The chant "Who dat? Who dat? Who dat say dey gonna beat dem Saints?“ became a rally cry for fans and the city
of New Orleans post-Katrina.
5. The Superdome is the largest enclosed arena in the world. More than two football fields in diameter. That is Super!!
4. Alcohol is available in New Orleans at any moment of the day. Bars can stay open all night and liquor is sold in grocery
stores. Anyone have eggs and bourbon on their grocery list?
3. Lee Harvey Oswald, John F. Kennedy’s ‘assassin’, was born in New Orleans in 1939.
2. New Orleans is where the first opera was performed in the U.S. back in 1796.
1. New Orleans is the birthplace of Jazz and many famous musicians such as Louis Armstrong, Fats Domino, and Harry
Connick Jr.
Enjoy “The Big Easy”
Executive and Initiative Chairs
Eddie Martinez – Chair
Genevra Pflaum – Vice Chair
Greg LaRochell – Past Chair
Garfield McIntyre – Treasurer
Jill Dupuis – Secretary
Susan Whitehead – Membership
Kelly Priest – Planning
Karen Rotondi – Communications
Dalia Khoury – Education
Lynn Martone – Risk Management
Brittainy Jones – Post Level Term
Rhonda Nielsen-Jackson – Data Quality
Mitch O’Campo – Innovation
RAPA RECOGNITION
• Special RAPA Thank You to the spokes that make our
RAPA wheel turn
• Members of our Board
• Initiative Leads and Committee volunteers
• Transitions in-progress
• Treasurer role
• Communications
• Education
• Risk Management
Thanks to our Sponsors!
PLATINUM
BLACK
Thanks to our Sponsors!
SILVER
GOLD
BRONZE
CANADA
US
Membership Overview
• 110 Members
• New Membership Package established
to encourage non-member companies
• Equitable distribution between Direct
Writers and Reinsurers
Other Countries 3%
Canada 41%U.S.A. 56%
2018 Geographic Distribution
Australia, Barbados, Bermuda, Oman Canada U.S.A.
40
%
41
%
7%
12
%
INSURA NCE COMPA NIES REINSURERS RETROCESS IONA IRES V END ORS
INDUSTRY DISTRIBUTION
CommunicationsWebsite
Fully functional with on-going improvements
RAPA content continues to be updated – Whitepapers, SOA, CRC,
Newsletters, etc - Check back frequently
Links to social media
Paypal Integration (reduces cost for Association)
Treasurer’s Report
Healthy Balance remains stable year-over-year
Robust Due Diligence
▪ Budget
▪ Cash Management
▪ Financial Statements
Annual IRS 990 filing completed for the association
Artificial Intelligence
We’re smarter together
September 2018
The journey towards smarter automation has just begun
Ashley Broering, AVP Digital & Smart Analytics
13
What is AI?
Why now?
Why care?
Agenda
Wow, what should we do?
2
3
4
1?
14
What is AI?
2 3 41?
Artificial Intelligence
15
The concept of AI is often mistaken for robots overtaking humanity
16
Artificial intelligence(AI) is the intelligence of a machine that could successfully perform any intellectual task that a human being can.
AI is the computer science term for allowing computers to think like humans
perceiving
reasoning
learning
problem solving
17
High Level AI Spectrum
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEbeginning in the 50s
MACHINE LEARNINGfrom the 80s
DEEP LEARNINGthe last decade
AI represents a spectrum of capabilities whereby machines learn from data
18
Machine learning: algorithms that use data and statistics so that computers get better at performing a task
Reinforcement Learning
Unsupervised Learning
Supervised Learning
Mac
hin
e Le
arn
ing
Tech
niq
ues
New Data
These are birds
Input: Unlabelled Data
“Bird”
“Bird”“Bird”
Take Action
Observe / Get Reward
Check Mate
Input: Labelled Data
Beginning State End State
Got it!
It’s a Bird
I see a pattern
19
Deep learning: a type of machine learning, inspired by biology, that uses multiple software layers to form a “neural network”
INPUT LAYER
HIDDEN LAYERS OUTPUT LAYER
Artificial Neural Network
• Require larger datasets• Generally produce better
results
Key Features:
More Layers = “Deep” Network
20
AlphaGo: A Deep Learning Success Story
Solution: self-play & unsupervised training
Image from: Alphagomovie.com
Image from: https://blog.yellowant.com/before-google-duplex-5-ai-technologies-that-wowed-us-52aa2f942338
Lee Sedolwinner of 18 world titles
computer program
“AlphaGo” vs.
Problem: Once we pass human performance, there is no more good training data
21
There are many branches and applications of AI
Virtual Assistants
Speech to Speech
Translation
Natural Language Processing
Robotics
Recommendation Engines
Analyze textual data written in human language, from words, syntactic structure, to semantic meaning
Studies the computing that relates to, arises from, or deliberately influences emotion or other affective phenomena.
Process images and videos. Recognize objects, identifying depth of objects, direction of light, and the interpretation of images.
Process signals and transform waveforms into words and sentences.
Some examples you may have heard of…
Computer Vision
Affective Computing
Speech Recognition
22
AI models and techniques enable increasingly advanced analytics
Image from: https://becominghuman.ai/lets-talk-about-advanced-analytics-a-brief-look-at-artificial-intelligence-bf1c7a7d3f96
23
Why now?
2 3 41?
24
AI is not a new topicSony first introduced its Autonomous Entertainment Robot, AIBO, in 1999
AIBO ERS-210 from: https://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press_Archive/200010/00-050A/
AIBO ERS-110, released in 1999
• Displays happiness and anger • Detects distance from a certain object• Has a head sensor so owners can praise or discipline the dog
AIBO ERS-110 from: https://www.roboticstoday.com/robots/aibo-ers-110-description
AIBO ERS-210, released in 2000
• Recognizes its own name and simple words• Has additional sensors so it can show “an abundant array of emotions”• Reacts to external stimulus and makes its own judgements
25
An era of massive data & cheap storage makes AI more accessible
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Sto
red
Dig
ital
Info
rmat
ion 2.7 Zetabytes
of data exist today
48hoursof new video every
minute of every day
100terabytes of data uploaded
daily on
44x more data in 2020 than in 2009
The Digital Transformation
Data sizes from: https://analyticsweek.com/content/big-data-facts/
Storage costs from: https://www.computerworld.com/article/3182207/data-storage/cw50-data-storage-goes-from-1m-to-2-cents-per-gigabyte.html
1MB hard drive cost $1M in 1967, today
it’s about $0.02
26
AI is more relevant now because the data explosion has been coupled with an increase in processing power
“Recent advances in hardware have
exponentially increased the
amount of data that can be
processed through deep learning.
Graphical processing units (GPUs) leveraged by video games have increased the speed of
deep learning systems by orders of magnitude,
reducing running times from weeks to days. “
- Dr. Christian Klose, Dr. Nitin Nayak
Decoding the human genome
10 years 1 week
27
AI algorithms have been developing and improving over time
1950 19601940
ANOVA
Fisher's linear discriminant
Naive Bayes classifier
Artificial Neural Network
Perceptron
Logistic regression
Backpropagation
Quadratic classifiers
Hidden Markov models
Nearest Neighbor Algorithm
K-means algorithm
1980 19901970
Multinomial logistic regression
Support Vector Machines
Single-linkage clustering
Expectation-maximization algorithm
CART
CHAID
Self-organizing map
Word Embedding
Boltzmann machine
Bayesian network
Boosting
C4.5
Bootstrap (bagging)
Apriori algorithm
Random Forests
2000 2010
Conditional Random Field
Latent Dirichlet Allocation
MapReduce
Deep Learning
2018
Non-parametric Bayesian
source: Andrew Ng
28
Advances in algorithms, data, and computing power have propelled AI into the spotlight
https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-analytics/our-insights/an-executives-guide-to-ai
AlgorithmsMassive data & cheap storage
Processing power
29
Why care?
2 3 41?
30
AI is already all around us.
1.
31
Voice Recognition in Every Day LifeDeep Learning enables speech recognition systems
Deep Learning revolutionized the field of speech recognition.
Almost all current speech recognition systems are based on Deep Learning.
32
AI in HealthcareAI can assist doctors in cancer detection
Skin cancer is primarily diagnosed visually, beginning with an initial clinical screening and followed potentially by dermoscopic analysis.
Deep Learning achieves performance on par with tested experts, demonstrating a level of competence comparable to dermatologists.
33
Autonomous Intelligent VehiclesDeep Learning to solve self-driving car tasks
Street Mapping
•Where am I?
Scene Understanding
•Where is everyone else?
Movement Planning
•How do I get from A to B?
Driver State
•What’s the driver up to?
https://selfdrivingcars.mit.edu/
34
Autonomous Intelligent VehiclesDeep Learning to solve self-driving car tasks
Street Mapping
•Where am I?
Scene Understanding
•Where is everyone else?
Movement Planning
•How do I get from A to B?
Driver State
•What’s the driver up to?
https://selfdrivingcars.mit.edu/
35
Autonomous Intelligent VehiclesDeep Learning to solve self-driving car tasks
Street Mapping
•Where am I?
Scene Understanding
•Where is everyone else?
Movement Planning
•How do I get from A to B?
Driver State
•What’s the driver up to?
https://selfdrivingcars.mit.edu/
36
Autonomous Intelligent VehiclesDeep Learning to improve driver safety
Street Mapping
•Where am I?
Scene Understanding
•Where is everyone else?
Movement Planning
•How do I get from A to B?
Driver State
•What’s the driver up to?
https://selfdrivingcars.mit.edu/
37
Man’s best friend is back
Sony is re-launching its robot dog, Aibo, which now uses the same kind of AI that’s in self-driving cars
$2,899 bundle package:
Aibo will be in the US in time for the holidays!
Source: https://www.cnet.com/news/sony-new-aibo-robot-dog-is-finally-coming-to-the-us/
38
AI is changing what we insure…
… and how we insure it
2.
39
AI touches all areas in the Insurance Value Chain
Sales UnderwritingPolicy
AdministrationClaims
40
AI can increase sales and streamline the sales process
➢Reach customers through new distribution channels
➢Personalize communication and provide relevant advice
➢Understand existing and potential customers to
improve upselling & cross-selling
➢Prioritize leads to focus on closing the most promising cases
SalesUnderwritin
g
Policy Administrat
ionClaims
Insurance products can be embedded in Digital Ecosystems to provide relevant product options
AI-enabled Opportunities:
41
AI will fundamentally change the way we assess risk
Pressure from consumers, new data sources, and analytics capabilities have given rise to accelerated underwriting initiatives
➢Improve customer journeys and lower costs by
increasing straight-through processing
➢Increase price flexibility through a more personalized and accurate cost of claims prediction
➢Detect anomalies due to mistakes and nondisclosure
SalesUnderwritin
g
Policy Administrat
ionClaims
AI-enabled Opportunities:
42
AI can help identify and manage risks in existing books of business
Smart home, smart mobility, and smart health devices engage consumers and provide new data streams for AI models
➢Engage policy holders to improve risk awareness and jointly prevent future risks
➢Understand if risk selection was as planned
➢Identify and manage factors that drive claims costs
➢Focus retention efforts to reduce lapse of good risks
SalesUnderwritin
g
Policy Administrat
ionClaims
AI-enabled Opportunities:
43
AI can streamline claims processing
Satellite images can be used to expedite the estimation of damages and claims following a natural catastrophe
➢Improve fraud detection
➢Optimize current claims processing
➢Estimate expected costs from open claims
SalesUnderwritin
g
Policy Administrat
ionClaims
AI-enabled Opportunities:
𝒑𝒊 𝒑𝒊
Satellite 𝑆𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 Satellite 𝑆𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒
44
Source: http://captricity.com/technology/
SalesUnderwriti
ng
Policy Administrat
ionClaims
AI enables digitization and automation along the entire insurance value chainAI-enabled Opportunities:
➢Digitize data
➢Convert unstructured data into a structured format
➢Automate repetitive tasks
45
We can be part of the change
3.
46
Deep learning could account for
$3.5-$5.8 trillion in annual value, across industries …
Source: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/notes-from-the-ai-frontier-applications-and-value-of-deep-learning
AI has the potential to make a big impact
…and $142-$312 billion in
insurance
47
There’s room for AI and humans to coexist
Source: https://hbr.org/2018/07/collaborative-intelligence-humans-and-ai-are-joining-forces
Humans Assisting Machines:
▪ Train machines to perform a task
▪ Explain the outcomes of machine tasks
▪ Sustain the responsible use of machines
Machines Assisting Humans:
▪ Amplify our cognitive strengths
▪ Embody human skills to extend our physical capabilities
▪ Interact with customers and employees, and free up our time
48
What can we do?
2 3 41?
Think about long-standing problems in new ways
Example and illustration from: https://hbr.org/2017/01/are-you-solving-the-right-problems
“Make the wait feel shorter.”Put up mirrorsPlay musicInstall a hand sanitizer
“Make the elevator faster.”Install a new liftUpgrade the motorImprove the algorithm
SOLUTION SPACE
SOLUTION FINDING“The elevator is too slow.”
PROBLEM FRAMING
Reframing the problem
“The wait is annoying.”
Imagine you own a building and your tenants are complaining about the elevator…
“The point of reframing is not to find the “real” problem but, rather, to see if there is a better one to solve.”
- Thomas Wedell-Wedellsborg, HBR, Jan-Feb 2017
50
Look for ways to test potential solutions quickly
Agile and Design Thinking methodologies help teams take a human-centered approach to innovation and develop solutions that people will actually use
• Fail fast
• Iterate on a prototype• Empathize with customers • Shorten the feedback loop
• Think “How might we?”
Key Concepts:
51
Data is the new gold
Deep learning algorithms have a
voracious appetite for data...
…but finding large datasets can be hard.
With appropriate diligence around data use, security, and privacy, it is possible to utilize and share valuable information
• Public data sources• Datasets that other departments may
maintain and use
• External partnerships to share and jointly analyze data
Consider:
52
What AI really means
Why we’re hearing about AI now
Why we should care about AI
We now understand…
What we can do to be part of the change
2
3
4
1?
53
Thank you!
54
General Public Release
Legal notice
55
©2018 Swiss Re. All rights reserved. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivative works of this presentation or to use it for commercial or other public purposes without the prior written permission of Swiss Re.
The information and opinions contained in the presentation are provided as at the date of the presentation and are subject to change without notice. Although the information used was taken from reliable sources, Swiss Re does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or comprehensiveness of the details given. All liability for the accuracy and completeness thereof or for any damage or loss resulting from the use of the information contained in this presentation is expressly excluded. Under no circumstances shall Swiss Re or its Group companies be liable for any financial or consequential loss relating to this presentation.
Sponsored by
Swiss Re
Break
CLAIMS: REVIEWING THE
CURRENT ECOSYSTEM AND
IDENTIFYING PRIORITIES
FOR IMPROVEMENT
58
RA
PA
20
18
AGENDA
Our Hypothesis on the Current Ecosystem
How We Have Addressed Current Challenges
Current Ecosystem Panel Q&A: Featuring Viewpoints of Reinsurer and Insurer
Audience Brainstorming: What are the Needs of Ceding Companies and Reinsurers?
Next Steps
58
RA
PA
20
18
59
RA
PA
20
18
OUR HYPOTHES I S ON THE
CURRENT ECOSYSTEM:
THE REINSURANCE
CLAIMS PROCESS IS
INEFFICIENT
59
RA
PA
20
18
60
RA
PA
20
18
Have inventory and status of all reinsurance claims
ACCURATE
Reinsurance claims are covered by the treaty and claim amounts including expenses are correct
Claims are submitted within agreed upon time standards and reflected in proper financial period
TIMELY
THE IDEAL
OPERATIONAL
CONTROL
FRAMEWORK
COMPLETE
61
RA
PA
20
18
HO W W E HAV E AD D R E S S E D
C U R R E NT C HAL L E NG E S
61
RA
PA
20
18
TAI partnered with a Reinsurer to improve overall process focusing on
improving exchange of seriatim claim data
HOW WE HAVE
ADDRESSED
CURRENT
CHALLENGES
Drive all claims into to TAI and create new extract from TAI of all claims and status
ACCURATE
Leverage the data relationships in TAI to properly allocate the claims amount to correct treaties/shares inclusive of DI,CI,LTD and expenses
Submitted claims are part of regular TAI cycles and reinsurer submits seriatim payment details back for TAI consumption which is also processed as a regular TAI cycle.
TIMELY
COMPLETE
62
RA
PA
20
18
63
RA
PA
20
18TARGET STATE TO ACHIEVE EFFICIENCY IN
REINSURANCE CLAIMS
.
Timely reporting of payments
Automation Eliminates Claim Payment screen
Common Format Supports all types of claims
64
RA
PA
20
18
CLAIM PROOFSExpected increased use of Xpress or continued use of
proprietary secure exchange.
ADDITIONAL
REINSURER
ADOPTIONIncremental value from one reinsurer sending cash seriatim file
THE GAP: WHAT IS
MISSING?
65
RA
PA
20
18
CURRENT ECOSYSTEM PA NEL Q&A:
FEATURING VIEWPOINTS OF:
Candy Tolentino Director, Commercial Reinsurance
Pacific Life Ins. Co.
Andrea HollyProcess Integration – Retrocession Administration Manager
Munich Re
65
RA
PA
20
18
66
RA
PA
20
18
In our current claims
process between
business partners –
WHAT SHOULD WE
CONTINUE?
66
RA
PA
20
18
P A N E L Q U E S T I O N 1
67
RA
PA
20
18
P A N E L Q U E S T I O N 2
67
RA
PA
20
18
In our current claims
process between
business partners –
WHAT SHOULD WE
START?
68
RA
PA
20
18
In our current claims
process between
business partners –
WHAT SHOULD WE
STOP?
P A N E L Q U E S T I O N 3
68
RA
PA
20
18
69
RA
PA
20
18
In our current claims
process between
business partners –
WHAT IS ONE STEP WE
CAN TAKE THAT WILL
HAVE GREATEST
IMPACT?
P A N E L Q U E S T I O N 4
69
RA
PA
20
18
70
RA
PA
20
18
WHAT ELSE CAN WE DO AS AN INDUSTRY COMMITTEE TO
IMPROVE OUR BUSINESS PRACTICES?
70
RA
PA
20
18
BRAINSTORM
71
RA
PA
20
18
WHAT SHOULD BE THE
NEXT STEPS?
71
RA
PA
20
18
72
RA
PA
20
18
APPENDIX – TAI CLAIMS FEATURES
73
RA
PA
20
18
Claims System
How you can benefit:
CONNECT TAI WITH YOUR CLAIMS SYSTEM
Improved accuracy Don’t have to wait for manual data pulls
Speeds up process
Efficiency & Operational Control
74
RA
PA
20
18HOW SHOULD YOU SEND SUPPORTING CLAIMS
EVIDENCE?
TAI X-Press Private FTP Email Regular Mail
75
RA
PA
20
18
.
EDC Claims Extract File (EDI Claims)
Automate recording of payments
Comprehensive data feed, for
internal use and for reinsurers
ENHANCEMENTS INTRODUCED LAST YEAR
Cash Flow extract (Claims Reimbursement feed)
76
RA
PA
20
18
.
CLAIMS EDI EXTRACT
Streamline claims reporting and eliminate the need for paper notices
Efficiency & Operational Control
77
RA
PA
20
18
BENEFITS
.
Timely reporting of payments
Automation Streamlined workflows
Common Format Comprehensive data
elements
Supports all types of claims
in one file format
78
RA
PA
20
18
.
CLAIMS REIMBURSEMENT EXTRACT
Automates and enhances the tracking of collected claims
Efficiency & Operational Control
79
RA
PA
20
18
BENEFITS
.
Timely reporting of payments
Automation Eliminates Claim Payment screen
Common Format Supports all types of claims
© 2018 TAI. All Rights Reserved.
THANK YOU!
© 2018 TAI. All Rights Reserved.
All-in-one Life Reinsurance
Software Solution.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
Reinsurance Study of Highly Insured PersonsTotal Line/Jumbo – is there a problem to be solved?
Brian MillmanVice President, Underwriting [email protected]
Amy RaymondDirector, Product [email protected]
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
84
Agenda
▪ Fraud
▪ History/Objective of ReSHIP
▪ Methodology
▪ Study Challenges
▪ Findings
▪ Case Studies
▪ Next Steps/Future State
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
85
▪ Playing Dead
▪ A Journey Through the World of Death Fraud
by Elizabeth Greenwood
https://www.npr.org/books/titles/489305469/playing-dead-a-journey-through-the-world-of-death-fraud
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
86
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
87
▪ Steve Israel
▪ John Darwin
▪ Skip Tracer
▪ Michael Jackson?
▪ The Philippines
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
88
Agent Organized Opportunistic Misrepresentation
• Medical
• Financial
• Producer
• Murder
• Foreign Death
• Fake Death
• Jumbo
• Foreign Travelers
• Para-med Fraud
• Churning
• Stacking
• Rebating
• Bogus
Applicant
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
89
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
90
Jumbo Limit Timeline
$50 Million
2005
Today
$65 Million, there is no buffer
$75 Million & Introduction of No Jumbo Layer
of $10M
Introduction of Super Jumbo layer,
- but No Jumbo eliminated by 4/2003
Post 9-11, loss of capacity
Super Jumbo layer disappears at end of 2004
2013
1999
2001
2003
2004
1998
Jumbo notification2008
Courtesy of
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
91
▪ Membership Model
▪ Data Coordination
▪ Receiving PHI / PII daily
▪ Analytics
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
92
Study Objective
▪ Reinsurance Study of Highly Insured Persons (ReSHIP) was developed to help quantify and define an industry-wide concern—the extent of jumbo limit breaches across the U.S. life insurance industry.
▪ Analyzes in-force policy data gathered from all participants
▪ Links highly-insured individuals (>$50 million) in life insurance together
▪ ReSHIP was successfully piloted in 2009 (8 reinsurers).
▪ MIB expanded the scope for ReSHIP 2013 by inviting direct writers (with significant internal retention)
▪ Repeated same effort for another study in 2017.
▪ Despite the history of jumbo limits varying, MIB has used the $65 million Jumbo Limit as a standard for all of the ReSHIP studies.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
93
2017 Participants/Timeline
▪ 7 - returning reinsurers
▪ 4 - new direct writers
▪ Obtained commitments and signed contracts by year end 2016
▪ Delivered data to MIB by June 1, 2017
▪ MIB delivers final results to study participants by September 30, 2017
One reinsurer and one direct writer contributed data but chose not to be named.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
94
Study Methodology
▪ Aggregate data across all companies and participants
▪ Identify/de-dupe individuals and policies
▪ Similar individuals in same submission and across submissions
▪ Name Match Confidence applied (Last/First Name, DOB, Gender)
▪ ‘Very confident' matches either match exactly or extremely close on all identifying criteria.
▪ 'Confident' matches will include small discrepancies in the identifying criteria.
▪ 'Less confident' matches had more discrepancies.
▪ Policy matching logic applied
▪ De-duping was based on matching Issue Date, Policy Number (deemed equal or close) and Face Amount
▪ Ceding company was removed as a duplicate criteria value after analysis showed it was increasing aggregated inforce totals for many individuals
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
95
Methodology Cont’d
▪ Report contains any individual with an aggregate exposure of at least $50 million and bands were defined as:
▪ $50 to $64.9 million
▪ $65 to $99.9 million
▪ $100+ million
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
96
Study Challenges
▪ Participation, timing of submissions
▪ Missing reinsurers and large direct writers with wholly retained business
▪ Mergers and acquisitions change blocks of business over time
▪ Treaty Limits vary – difference by company and by product
▪ Aggregating the Policy level details
▪ Policy Number submissions vary across companies, and often included common suffixes and prefixes
▪ Logic was defined to determine if one policy number was contained within the other
▪ Errors or inconsistencies in the data
▪ Variations in total face amounts per submitter. At least one Reinsurer’s records seemed to double the total face amount on records inflating overall inforce
aggregates.
▪ Bottom Line
▪ Results likely include false positives and overstatement of aggregate in-force values for some, but ultimately provide a meaningful representation.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
97
Records
Total records submitted for ReSHIP 1,131,704
Number of records that were submitted and returned in results 56,225
Individuals
Number of Individuals returned in the results 19,524
Number of individuals with in force between 50 and 64.9 million 8,513
Number of individuals with a breach 6,294
Number of individual with a contestable breach 772
Policies
Number of policies that breached 9,748
Number of contestable policies that breached 1,103
ReSHIP 2017 Results
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
98
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
99
Example- “Clean” Case
Policy number, issue date and face amounts vary making de-duping simpler and less subjective
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
100
Example- Face Amount
Same policy number, issue date, different face amounts for each record
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
101
Example- Double Face Amount
Same policy number, issue date, different face amount counts as New
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
102
User “experience”
MIB’s role
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
103
2013 chart - Concentration of top 50 Individuals (Total Inforce)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 10 20 30 40 50Ag
gre
ga
te In
Fo
rce
(M
illio
ns
)
Count of Policies
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
104
2013 chart - Concentration of Individuals 51-100 (Total Inforce)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 10 20 30 40 50
Count of Policies
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
105
Is there a better way to solve this problem?
▪ Transactional
▪ At policy issue
Issues
▪ Use of data
▪ FCRA
▪ Coverage
▪ Better matching /de-duping
MIB
Member
Reply: Brian Millman - $70,000,000
123XYZ; 2 IAI
Co 1 Co 2 Co 3
MIB U/W
Services
Brian Millman
Code: 123XYZ
IAI: 2 RepliesBrian Millman
$5,000,000
Brian Millman
$25,000,000
Brian Millman
$40,000,000
MIB Financial U/W Services
Inquiry: Brian Millman
April 2014
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited.
© 2018 MIB Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this information without prior MIB approval is strictly prohibited
106
Sponsored by
LOGiQ3
Lunch
Roundtables
Design Thinking Sprint:
The Puzzle Project
Accelerated Underwriting
Do Old Dog Need to Learn
New Tricks OR Do New Dogs
Need to Learn Old Tricks
Sponsored by
Hannover Re
Break
Sponsored by
Cocktails & Dinner
RAPA | 2018 Annual Conference
October 23, 2018
Agenda
8:45 – 9:00 Welcome and Agenda Review
9:00 – 10:00 Transformation & Innovation
10:00 – 10:30 Break & Conference Evaluation Survey
10:30 - 12:00 Initiative Updates
- Education
- Risk Management
- Data Initiative
- Post Level Term
- Innovation
12:00 – 12:30 Project and Initiative Breakout Meetings
12:30 Adjourn
2019 Conference
Mark your calendar for the 2019 Annual Conference!!
October 20th – 22nd, 2019
Savannah, GA Marriott - Mansion on Forsyth Park
Sponsorship Opportunities
$5,000
Platinum
$3,000
Gold
$2,500
Silver
$1,500
Bronze
$1,000
2018 Conference Evaluation Survey
Sponsored by
Break
Initiative Strategy
Purpose: To improve the effectiveness and efficiency of RAPA member's reinsurance
understanding and processes. The initiatives work streams provides the
opportunity for members to work together on education, training, and to benefit
from robust collaboration with industry experts within the working groups.
Want to join an Initiative? Just contact one of
the leads
Education: Dalia Khoury
Data: Rhonda Nielsen-Jackson
Risk: Lynn Martone
Post Level: Brittainy Pratt
Innovation: Mitch O’Campo
Thinking of a new initiative?
Submit your suggestion to Eddie Martinez
RAPA
DATA
EDUCATION
RISK
PLT
INNOVATION
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
EDUCATION INITIATIVE
Education Initiative
Purpose
To develop training material for different
processing functions and ultimately have case
studies.
The training material includes the following topics:
▪ Treaty Fundamentals and Provisions
▪ Glossary of Reinsurance Terms
▪ Workflow of New Business
▪ Workflow of Maintenance
Education Initiative
Our 2018 mandate is to develop a webinar to inform RAPA
members and non-members of the educational material
available, how to access it and the costs (if any).
Future plans under discussion include a webinar about
Best Practices and another about Post Level Term.
Education Initiative
Deliverables
4Q2018 – RAPA/Education Initiative Webinar
1Q 2019- Post Level Term
If you have ideas for webinars or podcast, let us know
Education Initiative
WHAT IS RAPA?
WHY SHOULD YOU BECOME A RAPA MEMBER?
WHO WILL BENEFIT?
WHY SHOULD YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL CONFERENCE?
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjil7r9pOjdAhWd2YMKHe6_A54QjRx6BAgBEAU&url=http://www.jatengpos.com/2012/10/dprd-jogja-pertanyakan-efektivitas-forpi-337365&psig=AOvVaw1D7_geVLB7zTcBvpiGh2Yw&ust=1538587767466664http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj-wY7avujdAhVF34MKHTAGCFQQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=http://tradezyone.com/&psig=AOvVaw2QcI5VY0z7FftdAiiNHmQo&ust=1538594872042119https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjVwo3Rw-jdAhVk5YMKHQJgDhsQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=https://laurelplace.ca/delta-chamber-networking-evening/&psig=AOvVaw3d_BLF9nGr4owmHoIhU9dl&ust=1538596174306731
Education Initiative
New Members are welcome
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwja35bQxejdAhVJ9YMKHYF0DQcQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=http://www.inlandempireafp.com/index.php?page%3D82&psig=AOvVaw3aHSsbuG8IFdKPfDsyUVpz&ust=1538596706415237
RISK INITIATIVE
Risk Initiative
Lynn Martone, Swiss Re
Amalia Figueiras, Prudential Financial
Risk Initiative
The RAPA Risk Management initiative team works to develop tools and techniques related to risk identification,
assessment and mitigation, as well as assessing audit and compliance reviews of the reinsurance administration
function. The key goal is to provide common reinsurance guidelines and methodology approaches for direct
writers, reinsurers and retrocessionaires.
This initiative is divided into two sub-teams with focus on:
Reinsurance Administration Risk Assessment:
The Risk Assessment sub-team has developed a risk assessment matrix (spreadsheet) detailing and defining
strategic, operational and compliance risks. We have concentrated our efforts on assessing the key sub risks to the
function and defining how it leads to risk mitigation. During 2018, our team completed the following:
• Confirmed all risk classifications in the matrix have been reviewed and populated appropriately.
• Assigned control names and risk categories to relevant key controls
• Took a deep dive into the Operational Sub Risks including; Quality Assurance, Collusion, Fraud, STOLI,
and Outsourcing
This updated document will be added to the RAPA website for your review.
Reinsurance Audit & Compliance Reviews:
The Audit & Compliance sub-team has identified what criteria should be used when selecting audit candidates.
Our areas of concentration focused on taking a deep dive into the administration and audit of term conversions.
During 2018, we completed the following:
• Reached out to committee members, as well as industry contacts, to discuss the world of term conversions.
• Researched and documented industry facts and insights regarding term conversion administration, audit
practices, pain points, etc.
• Drafted the Administration view/practices to complete best industry approaches (and insights) when auditing
term conversions.
• Drafting the Audit view/practices (and insights) of white paper to be shared with the industry.
Risk Initiative
Next Steps - 2019
Risk Assessment:
• Gather feedback from larger population
regarding: what are your pain
points/biggest risk?
• Treaty negotiations, administration
and set up?
• Ongoing adherence?
• Financial reporting?
• KPI’s?
• Based on feedback, this subcommittee will
continue to take a deep dive into the next
relevant sub risk.
Audit & Compliance:
• Continue writing of Audit practices and
combine with Administration practices to
complete white paper for final review.
• Publish Term Conversion white paper on
RAPA site.
• Continue discussions and research on next
key audit topic identified by team in 2018 /
PLT.
Thank you to all who took time from
their day job to support this initiative!
Lynn Martone, Swiss Re
Amalia Figueiras, Prudential
Laura D’Andrea, Prudential
Garfield McIntyre, Munich Re
Anthea Cote, Munich Re
Ricky Peterson, Munich Re
Carolyn MacPherson, Swiss Re
Carol Arada, Swiss Re
Janice Lawrence, Pac Life
Alan Woodlard, RGA
Barbara Beicker, USAA
Kelly Priest, LOGIQ3
Karl Martone, Martone & Martone
Antonio Layne, RBC
Thomas Trent, Transamerica
Jennifer Atlee, Hannover Re
Kim Langstaff, Hannover Re
Glenn Beuschel, Munich Re
Chantal Lessard, Optimum Re
John Whitaker, RGA
Bethany Stivenson, Axa
Troy Leach, Canada Life
Zayda Marie, Associated Consulting
DATA QUALITY INITIATIVE
Data Initiative
Initiative Participants
➢ Initiative Chair: Rhonda Nielsen-Jackson, Hannover Re
Dean Santos, Munich Re Toni Ollerton, Aurigen Re
Sumitra Kumhare, Pacific Life Re Diana Aversa, Pacific Life Re
Genevra Pflaum, Hannover Re Grace Sirianni, Munich Re
Eileen Ah-Fat, Canada Life Kate Coyle, Ohio National
Duane Pfaff, Voya Lisa Clarke, Logiq3
Mindy Epstein-Hinshaw, Logiq3 Saline Smith, Swiss Re
Melinda Bynoe, BMO Reinsurance Dzan Dinh, Munich Re
Karen Lipka, RGA Allison Forde, RBC
Maureen Headley, Met Life Tom Kuenzel, Ameriprise Financial
Paul Winters, Q-Perior Tom Hartlett, Logiq3
Purpose
• Create a document for Guidelines for Reinsurance Reporting, in essence a document of
best practices for specific areas of reinsurance administration and data quality.
• The document includes information, samples and realistic scenarios. Topics:
▪ Reporting Issues
▪ Communication/Notifications
▪ Data Quality
▪ Conversions
▪ Taking a Treaty from paper to system implementation
▪ Samples of typical reinsurance reporting, i.e. Policy Exhibit, Transaction files, etc.
Data Initiative
Data Initiative
Deliverables & Milestones
1) Reinsurance-Reporting-Guidelines-and Best-Practices living document versions
1-6 have been rolled out between October 2014 and November 2017
❖ Currently available on the RAPA website @
http://www.reinsadmin.org under Initiatives and Data Management
2) Reporting Guidelines and Best Practices status:
a) Complete
▪ Reporting Issues
▪ Communication/Notifications
❖ Communicating New System, Data or Administration to Business
Partners is available on RAPA website and not required to be a
RAPA Member to use.
▪ Conversions
▪ Taking a Treaty from paper to system implementation
▪ Samples of typical reinsurance reporting, i.e. Policy Exhibit,
Transaction files, etc
b) Same topic – new twist
▪ Data Quality
http://www.reinsadmin.org/
Initiate
RAPA: Data Quality Initiative
Support
Create a Team of Advisors
SMART Goal Set
Develop a Plan
Execute
Complete Objective
RAPA Data Quality Initiative: Project Cycle
Big Data
Tre
aty
Com
pli
an
ce
The alignment of accurate data with its intended
use
Data Quality
Initiate
RAPA: Data Quality Initiative
Focus:Data Quality: Treaty Compliance
• How can we better state the administration requirements written in the treaty?
Dean Santos Director, Reinsurance Administration Individual Reinsurance OperationsMunich Re Canada (Life)
Sumitra KumbhareAVP OperationsPacific Life Re | Retro
Toni OllertonSenior Business Analyst, North America LifePartnerRe
Diana Aversa, ACSSenior Treaty AnalystPacific Life Re | Retro
Support
Create a Team of Advisors
SpecificClear and concise goals.
•Create a Mission Statement
•Identify purpose and objective
MeasurableAbility to track progress.
•Develop plan withmilestones for completing the documentation with the Data Quality focus team
AchievableSet challenging, yet achievable goals.
•Plan allows for review and feedback by the committee
•Distribute to participants of the RAPA - Data Quality Initiative
RelevantGoals that are relevant to our overall plan.
•Complete the documentation on the focus for RAPA - Data Quality Initiative
•Opportunity of standardization by creating the basis of expected data
•Communicate and promote approach through RAPA
TimelyTarget finish time.
•Recruit participants for the committee
•Assign accountabilities to committee members
•Set up touch points with participants of the RAPA - Data Quality Initiative
•Update RAPA on the focus and approach for the Data Quality Initiative
•Promote initiative and next steps
SMART Goal Set
Data Quality: Treaty Compliance
Our mission is to ensure that the highest quality of data is
delivered through the coordination of our efforts for the purpose of lowering the
risk of systemic issues.
Data Quality Mission Statement
SMART Goal Set
Purpose: Ensure that data produced adheres to the treaty and satisfies both business and the technological requirements.
✓ Treaty, Plan fields identification
✓ Data requirements and validation
Client Data Files
Data Transformation
Internal Stakeholders
✓ File types (Inforce, Transaction, Billing, Claims)
✓Meeting the needs of our stakeholders
SMART Goal Set
CESSION ADMINISTRATION
1. REPORTING, BILLING AND PAYMENT OF ACCOUNTS
Reporting
(1) The reporting period will not be less frequent than quarterly.
(2) The Cedant will provide the Reinsurer with the minimum data requirements within 30 days of the end of the applicable reporting period, reflecting all reinsurance transactions taking place during the reporting period, with respect to Policies reinsured under this Agreement as set forth in the Reinsurer's Minimum Data Reporting Requirements, as amended from time
to time, in an electronic data interchange (EDI) format acceptable to the Reinsurer. the Reinsurer's current version of its Minimum Data Reporting Requirements as at the Effective Date
is attached as an Appendix to the Agreement. If the information reasonably required by the Reinsurer for the maintenance of proper records and appropriate actuarial reserves changes,
the original format agreed upon by the Cedant and the Reinsurer for the details reported by the Cedant will be updated to the extent possible. Any changes to the data field layout last
agreed to with the Reinsurer must be communicated in writing to the Reinsurer at least 30 days before the end of the applicable reporting period.
Sample: Current
Objective: Reestablish the requirements in the treaty to clearly state the needs of the Reinsurer to better utilize technology and to satisfy the needs of our stakeholders. Develop treaty language to be used as a source of reference with a minimum data requirements template that is promoted by RAPA.
SMART Goal Set
Jul 2018•Create deck and plan on the Data Quality focus
Aug 2018•Discuss advisory committee review
• Incorporate feedback
Sep 2018• Share the deck with
RAPA Data Quality group
Oct 2018• Discuss at the RAPA
Conference
Feb 2019• Prepare a draft
• Advisory committee review
Mar 2019• Complete proposal
Apr 2019• Discuss at the RAPA
Spring Conference
• Determine next steps
Develop Plan
Treaty: Cession Administration
Minimum data requirements
Frequency of the reporting
Consistent file name and data
format
File type provided (Inforce,
Transactional, Billing, Claims)
Machine readable format
Plan allocation
Communication of changes to:
Data transmission
File format
Actuarial reserves
Execute
Minimum data
requirements
Frequency of the
reporting
Communication of changes to:
Data transmission
File format
Actuarial reserves
Elements for the ProposalCurrent
Factors for completeness:
1. Utilizing the Treaty as the agreement to support our administrative requirements.
2. Developing a sample of Treaty wording for Cession Administration that can be used as reference.
3. Promoting a base of reference in communicating the needs of a reinsurer through RAPA.
Complete Objective
Minimum data requirements
Frequency of the reporting
Consistent file name and data
format
File type provided (Inforce,
Transactional, Billing, Claims)
Machine readable format
Plan allocation
Communication of changes to:
Data transmission
File format
Actuarial reserves
Administration Requirements
POST-LEVEL TERM INITIATIVE
POST LEVEL TERM
STARTING AT THE END
RAPA PLT Committee
2018
Data Inconsisten
cies
Shock Lapse
Timing Issues
Premium Inaccuracies
Data Analysis & Reporting
System Administrati
on
Standardization
Product Innovation
Addressing Financial Volatility
For many years, level term policies entered into administration systems have been entered as quickly and efficiently as possible. Often times the need to enter plans
with descriptive titles and actual term periods has been overlooked and due to time constraints there has been a
lack of forethought to what happens at the end of the level period. Conventional thinking has been that the policy would terminate prior to the post level period.
What happens if it does not?
So that is where we start…at the end.
Why do we need to discuss PLT?
Experience shows that policies are approaching and entering the post level term period more frequently and that is leading to some industry wide issues:
• Data Inconsistencies
• Premium Inaccuracies
• Administration Inconsistencies
• Shock Lapses
• Difficulty Modeling
• Financial Volatility
• Communication Gaps in Reinsurance Partnerships
• New Product Implementation Administration Challenges
• Resourcing Gaps to Handle Administration Challenges
Where do we begin?
As we reviewed issues and challenges presenting themselves as a result of Post Level Term Administration we arrived at four distinct categories that covered the issues presented.
Administration & Processing
Communication
FinanceEmerging
Trends
Data Integrity
• Conduct system data integrity reviews to identify inaccuracies
• Create log of identified issues and develop corrective action plans
Corrections
• Develop timelines for all corrections and communicate plans and timeline to Internal Customers, Reinsurers and Retros
• Understand implications/downstream effects of corrections within the reinsurance system
Implementation
• Develop governance and guidelines to ensure products are implemented into the system accurately
• Create a repeatable process that includes appropriate testing of administration
Controls
• Develop appropriate controls to ensure previous issues are mitigated in the current environment
• As corrections and implementations occur ensure proper signoff from downstream consumers of data
Addressing Data Issues – Past and PresentMany current day data issues are the result of historical system migrations, upgrades and poor administrative practices. As we move toward leveraging our data throughout our organizations, the accuracy and integrity of the data becomes increasingly more important.
Shock Lapse
Inconsistency in the administration of policies entering the post level term period create difficulties for Reinsurers and Retrocessionaires. For Reinsurers and Retrocessionaires tracking direct writers method of administration can be helpful. Implementing predictive analysis to address each direct writers preferred method can provide the ability to produce more accurate estimates for accruals and reduce the amount of adjustments required.
Policies are kept active but remit premiums based on the last year of the term period
PLT A
ctive Policies
Policies are suppressed for 2-3 months to off-set the “Shock Lapse” activities
PLT
Po
licy
Sup
pre
ssio
n
PLT
Pre
miu
m P
ayin
g
Post level term premiums are paid and lapses are applied as they occur
Premium Inaccuracies
Correct Premiums
Ensure correct premium rates at renewal and verify rates within reinsurance system are accurate and complete.
Conduct trending and predictive analysis to identify large premium increases on level term blocks to signify the entrance of policies into the post level term period.
Premium Rate Implementation
Implement premium increases utilizing appropriate methodology and governance to ensure appropriate timing and communication to internal stakeholders, reinsurers and retrocessionaires.
Ensure testing addresses all use cases to mitigate the need for recoding or corrections.
Repricings
Initiate communication with Reinsurers or Retrocessionaires early in the repricing process to ensure engagement and ease negotiations.
Ensure appropriate treaty setup in preparation for repricings by leveraging reinsurance system test environments to test rate application and premium calculations.
Data Analysis & Reporting
Timely Updates
Prepare and communicate timely updates of both assumed company and reinsurance administration systems to ensure accurate premiums, reserves, financial modeling and reporting.
Resource Allocation
Create a resource allocation and training plan to ensure the appropriate resource skill mixture is available to work on administration projects related to Post Level Term products.
Risk Mitigation &
Analysis
Implement risk reviews and quality assurance checks and analysis to obtain the appropriate comfort with data being received and reported.
Reporting Consistency
Implement a practice of providing descriptive and consistent naming conventions for plan/treaty codes in the reinsurance administration system. Eases administration for both direct writers, reinsurers and retrocessionaires. Catalog or keep a library of treaty mapping to plan and treaty codes to aid responses to reinsurance partners.
System Administration
Term Campaigns− Often times campaigns are unique and difficult to administer.
− Provide/Obtain detailed information during negotiations to ensure assuming administration team understand the product(s) and the challenges administration may present.
Addressing Direct Writers Flexible Products
‒ Direct Writers like to offer flexible products to their clients at competitive prices and this can create challenges for administration as they strive to retain business.
‒ Reinsuring products may require complex treaty setup to be administered correctly in the reinsurance system. Administration representatives should receive notifications throughout negotiations and should start writing business requirements early to determine if the complexity can be handled with base reinsurance system functionality or if custom modifications are required.
Administration System Setup
‒ Leverage reinsurance system test environments to ensure proper setup of treaties, pointers and rates.
‒ Leverage project implementation plans to create a repeatable process with appropriate controls and signoffs to mitigate the risk of incorrect system setup.
Better Data, Better Analysis
Data
Multiple options have been added to handle an
organization’s preferred method of administering PLT policies on the administration
system
Delayed Renewal Processing & Automatic Recalculation in 1st
year of Post Level Term are a few of those methods
System
Leverage System Updates to improve administration
processing, data quality and analytics
For example reinsurance systems have been updated to include switches that indicate
the level term period on a treaty code to aid in
communication to reinsurers and retrocessionaires
Analytics
Utilize proactive monitoring of level term business in
conjunction with historic data/ lapse and mortality studies to facilitate the adjustment and
scaling of estimates
Leverage new data fields in predictive analytics to estimate
financials and approximate accruals as they achieve post
level term period
Create industry standards around…
PLT Administration & Premium Reporting
Graded Periods
Scaled Premium Rate
Implementation
Lapse Practices
Create guidelines to standardize reporting files to reinsurers, so the need for translation/interpretation is minimal
Create guidelines to standardize graded periods used in pricing new products and the method of implementation in reinsurance systems
Ensure that scaled premium rate implementations adhere to specific guidelines to allow for consistency in modeling
Develop products and practices to mitigate shock lapses with insureds
Financial Volatility
As treaties and amendments are negotiated ensure representatives from all areas are present – Administration, Finance, Actuarial
Fluctuations in cash flow caused by paying the first year PLT premium and having the policy lapse a month or two later.
Direct writers decrease premiums charged to insureds but do not notify the reinsurer of the change in rate structure.
Incorrect premium rates are coded in the reinsurance system and PLT policies that truly remain inforce are paying the incorrect premium. When this is discovered there is often a fairly significant financial impact.
Run audit checks of premium calculations against entire blocks of term business by sample selection or by treaty code to effectively review large blocks. Ensure rates are populated in the reinsurance system beyond the term periods final duration.
Adjust parms and invest in system modifications to communicate specific arrangements/rate structures/unique product terms via reporting to reinsurers and retrocessionaires.
Today we see… Tomorrow we should…
CommunicationIn order to manage PLT business efficiently and effectively special attention is required to how you implement and evaluate change with in the organization. Imploring a consistent methodology can increase reinsurance partner communication, while minimizing the time and effort required to do so.
Initial ResearchDetermining
Course of ActionImplementation
Initial Research: Identify Business✓ What is the level term period being
analyzed? Where is the administration performed?
✓ Are there key dates when a large count of policies will enter PLT?
✓ Who are the reinsurers?✓ Are we repricing business? ✓ Has my direct writer contacted me about
repricing business?
Determining Course of Action✓ Communicate Intent
• Reprice or grade direct premiums?
• Allow policies to enter PLT ungraded?
✓ Provide Details • Assumptions for potential
grading decision• Describe administrative changes
✓ Identify Risk/Concerns• Will reinsurers want to opt out
Implementation✓ Execute Treaty Amendments✓ System Implementation
• Share specifics• New TAI Treaty codes• New Rates
• Settle-up vs Programming Changes
✓ Audit
Conclusion
As term business approaches the post level term period, there are administrative implications and business decisions that both the direct insurer and participating reinsurers must be aware of. Predictive and smooth earnings with minimal volatility of premiums paid, while maintaining sound administrative practices that adhere to the governing treaties is always the goal. Insurers, Reinsurers and Retrocessionaires can use effective communications, standardized administrative processing guidelines and innovation to ensure administration runs smoothly, accurate reporting is produced and business profitability is achieved.
INNOVATION INITIATIVE
169
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
LEVERAGING COLLABORATION ACROSS THE RAPA COMMUNITY
169
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
170
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
• A treaty management hub to help automate the treaty management process
• Industry standard language to simplify the complexity of treaty language
• A contributory database to give the industry a baseline for benchmarking
• A premium validation tool to address the risk of future financial impact
INDUSTRY IDEAS GENERATED BY RAPA COMMITTEE
171
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WE SURVEYED THE RAPA BOARD & BROADER MEMBER COMMUNITY TO DISCOVER WHICH IDEA WOULD BR ING THE MOST VALUE
172
Co
ok
ho
use
LabOUT OF MORE THAN 100 SURVEY RESPONDENTS…
A premium validation tool to address the risk of future financial impact37%
173
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WORKSTREAMS IDENTIFIED
5
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
PMO / LOGISTICS
174
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
6
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WORKSTREAMS IDENTIFIED
PMO / LOGISTICS BUSINESS PROCESS
175
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
7
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WORKSTREAMS IDENTIFIED
PMO / LOGISTICS BUSINESS PROCESS TECHNOLOGY
176
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
8
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WORKSTREAMS IDENTIFIED
PMO / LOGISTICS BUSINESS PROCESS TECHNOLOGY MARKET / DATA
INDUSTRY
177
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
9
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WORKSTREAMS IDENTIFIED
PMO / LOGISTICS BUSINESS PROCESS TECHNOLOGY MARKET / DATA
INDUSTRYCOMMUNICATION
178
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
SLIDE 6
10
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WHAT WOULD THIS TOOL NEED?
179
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
GENDERSMOKER
CLASSAGE BASIS
UNDER-WRITING
PLT
BENEFITS RATINGS DURATIONSELECT/
ULTIMATE
1791
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WHAT WOULD THIS TOOL NEED?
180
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
1802
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WHAT DID WE CONSIDER NEXT?
181
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
SCALABILITY
1813
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WHAT DID WE CONSIDER NEXT?
182
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
SCALABILITY TRANSPARENCY
1824
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WHAT DID WE CONSIDER NEXT?
183
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
TRANSPARENCYSCALABILITY USABILITY
1835
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WHAT DID WE CONSIDER NEXT?
184
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
TRANSPARENCYSCALABILITY USABILITY AFFORDABLE
1846
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WHAT DID WE CONSIDER NEXT?
185
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
TRANSPARENCYSCALABILITY USABILITY AFFORDABLE
1857
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
WHAT DID WE CONSIDER NEXT?
186
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
CARRIER
REINSURER 1
REINSURER 2
REINSURER 3
Ceded Premiums
Ceded Premiums
Ceded Premiums
1868
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
PROPOSED SOLUTION
187
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
1879
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
W E E N V I S I O N T H I S T O B E A N I N D U S T R Y - W I D E P L A T F O R M T H A T C A N A L S O B E U S E D T O G E N E R A T E B E N C H M A R K I N G D A T A
188
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
20
Co
ok
ho
use
Lab
MORE DETAILS AVAILABLE IN THE WHITEPAPER
THE ROAD TO BETTER DATA
AN INDUSTRY WHITEPAPER FOR L IFE REINSURANCE
BREAKOUT SESSION
Breakout Sessions
1. Executive - Eddie Martinez
2. Planning - Kelly Priest
3. Data Quality - Dean Santos
4. Risk Initiative - Amalia Figueiras
5. Post Level Term - Brittainy Jones
6. Education - Dalia Khoury
7. Innovation - Mitch O’Campo
8. Audit & Compliance - Lynn Martone