Upload
chesna
View
47
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
R&D - a Crucial Element in Fish Feed. New York Investment Forum, May 2014 Torben Svejgard Group CEO BioMar. BioMar key figures 2013. Turnover 1.6 billion USD* EBIT 7 3 m USD* ROIC 20% Production volume approx. 1 million tons Approx. 1,000 employees (including JV’s) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d1
R&D - a Crucial Element in Fish FeedNew York Investment Forum, May 2014
Torben SvejgardGroup CEO BioMar
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d2
BioMar key figures 2013
• Turnover 1.6 billion USD*
• EBIT 73 m USD*
• ROIC 20%
• Production volume approx. 1 million tons
• Approx. 1,000 employees (including JV’s)
• Production in Norway, Scotland, Denmark, France, Spain, Greece, Chile, and Costa Rica (and planned for Turkey late 2015)
* May 2014 exchange rate
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d
Owned by listed industrial conglomerate Schouw & Co.
3
135 years of history 125 years in packaging
25 years as conglomerate
5 core businesses today
Consolidated revenue $2.1bn
Consolidated EBIT $126m
2,100 employees in more than 20 countries
Listed on Nasdaq OMXCopenhagen since 1954
BioMar 75% of consolidated revenue and 58% of EBIT
$1,600m
$287m
$172m
$845m
$89m
BIOMARThe World’s third largest manufacturer of quality
feed for industrialised fish farming
FIBERTEX PERSONAL CARE
The World’s fifths largest producer
of spunbond for hygieneFIBERTEX NONWOVENSLeading European
manufacturer of nonwovens for industrial applications
KRAMP (20%)The absolute largest supplier in Europe of
accessories and parts for farming
HYDRA-GRENELeading in Denmark within hydraulic components and
solutions
2013
rev
enue
THE PORTFOLIOAT A GLANCE
FY2013 amounts converted at USD/DKK 5.42Kramp (20% owned) not in consolidated figures
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d4
Total Shareholder Return
• Indexed share price performance adjusted for share splits etc.
• Any cash dividends are reinvested in the stock (no transaction costs assumed)
• Danish companies are denominated in DKK, US companies in USD, i.e. the data show no exchange rate effect
• Percentages show the annual return whereas the y-axis show the total increase over the period
• Last date is 3 April 2014• Source: Datastream• Maersk and Berkshire have
multiple share classes, and Maersk B shares and Berkshire Hathaway A shares are used
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d5
From 2013: A period of 1¼ yearsSchouw & Co. 64,3%
Mærsk45,8%
Berkshire30,3%
GE22,7%
Total Shareholder ReturnHistorical share price developent with dividends reinvested
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d6
From 2009: A period of 5¼ yearsSchouw & Co. 29,4%
Mærsk20,0%Berkshire13,4%
GE13,4%
Total Shareholder ReturnHistorical share price developent with dividends reinvested
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d7
Berkshire8,1%
From 2004: A period of 10¼ yearsSchouw & Co. 18,3%
Mærsk5,9%
GE1,7%
Total Shareholder ReturnHistorical share price developent with dividends reinvested
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d8Generalforsamling 2014
From 1994: A period of 20¼ years
1 0 . 0 4 . 2 0 14
Schouw & Co. 14,5%
Mærsk9,6%
Berkshire12,8%
GE8,4%
Total Shareholder ReturnHistorical share price developent with dividends reinvested
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d9
R&D in fish feed- needed or just a buzzword?
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d10
Just a pile of pellets – how difficult can that be??!!
Well………………
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d11
An example - looking back on fishmeal replacement
• Late 90’es to late 00’es: High focus on fishmeal replacement in salmon industry
• Total feed industry R&D spend on this task: up towards 175 million USD +/- (?)
• Result: Global salmon farming industry saves 1.3 billion USD annually (not only related to fishmeal/oil replacement work, but also generally increased nutritional knowledge)
• Much higher fishmeal prices if no reduction in usage, so added value much higher
• Same relative savings in bass & bream and (European) portion trout, etc. – and being transferred to other species, e.g. shrimp
1998 Knowledge
2013 Knowledge
00.5
11.5
22.5
Price in USD/kg for a typical Norwegian
Salmon feed
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d12
Fish feed still early on learning curve
Fish feed
Poultry feed
Pig feed
Time
Knowledge / sophistication
Fish nutrition R&D probably more complex than for terrestrial animals
• Variation in water temperatures and thereby fish body temperatures
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d13
Future feed R&D work
Process technology innovation an essential discipline including the link between physical quality and nutrition
Days post challenge
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Cum
ulat
ive
mor
talit
y (%
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Control dietPrevious PlusPlus 3
SRS
Still focus on feed performance – optimising and extending raw material basket
Increased focus on health and feed nutrition interaction
Prioritisation depends much on the development stage of
the market!
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d14
Conclusions and implications for feed industry
• A lot of feed R&D work conducted, but we still have a lot to do
• Further substantial increase in feed R&D investment needed
• Consequences for feed suppliers• Need for continued significant R&D costs increases (BioMar has
almost doubled R&D spend last 4 years)• Critical size essential for a feed supplier to be able to afford needed
R&D investments
w w w . b i o m a r . c o m
W o r l d C l a s s F i s h F e e d15
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!