Rebeccas Tramscript

Academic Transcript Page: 1Date of Transcript: 16/03/2015

Somerville, Rebecca

Student Date of Birth

23/05/1993

Banner ID Hesa ID

B00231096 1111052310966

3 Larchfield Grove Branchalwood, Wishaw, North Lanarkshire, Scotland, ML2 8TUAddress:

Qualifications Conferred: None

Transferred Credit: None

201415Term Level: L10 - Level 10 (Honours Year)

Status: Enrolled

SCIENCE Science

Decision(s) Trimester 1:Trimester 2:Trimester 3:

Campus: Hamilton Major/Minor: Applied Bioscience

Module Grade ResultMark LSL7 L8 L9 L10 L11 ECTSTrimester U/K

BIOL10006 Bioscience Research Project T2 00000000

BIOL10007 Cells and Disease T2 00000000

BIOL10009 DNA Technology T2 00000000

66.6BIOL10008 Clinical Immunology T1 B1 Pass 1000020000

57.0BIOL10025 Food & Environmental Microbiol T1 B2 Pass 1000020000

2000040000Session Totals:

201314Term Level: L9 - Level 9 (Year 3)

Status: Enrolled

SCIENCE Science

Decision(s)PS - Proceed Select Programme

Trimester 1:Trimester 2:Trimester 3:


Award(s): BSc Applied Bioscience


64.1BIOL09009 Bio-case study T2 B1 Pass 1000002000

46.5BIOL09011 Bio-professional Practice T2 C Pass 1000002000

63.8BIOL09014 Factors affecting the drug act T2 B1 Pass 1000002000

65.5BIOL09002 Haematology and Immunology T1 B1 Pass 1000002000

48.3BIOL09005 Applied Microbiology T1 C Pass 1000002000

59.3BIOL09020 Pure & Applied Genetics T1 B2 Pass 1000002000


Student:

Date of Transcript: 16/03/2015 Academic Transcript Page: 2

Somerville, Rebecca (Contd.)


Status: Enrolled

SCIENCE Science

Decision(s)PN - Proceed Next stage




68.0BIOL08003 Human Biology T2 B1 Pass 1000000200

57.6BIOL08004 Introductory Microbiology T2 B2 Pass 1000000200

60.7BIOL08006 Analytical Techniques T2 B1 Pass 1000000200

48.4BIOL08005 Cells and Sugars T1 C Pass 1000000200

61.4BIOL08012 Genetics T1 B1 Pass 1000000200

74.4BIOL08014 Pharmacology, drugs and behavi T1 A Pass 1000000200



Status: Enrolled

SCIENCE Science

Decision(s)PN - Proceed Next stage




70.2BIOL07003 Biodiversity T2 A Pass 1000000020

76.5BIOL07017 Kinetic Anatomy T2 A Pass 1000000020

54.5MATH07001 Dealing with Data T2 B2 Pass 1000000020

57.0BIOL07001 Cells and Molecules T1 B2 Pass 1000000020

59.8CHEM07003 Structure of Chemistry T1 B1 Pass 1000000020

70.2CHEM07009 Scientific Investigation T1 A Pass 1000000020


Student:

Date of Transcript: 16/03/2015 Academic Transcript Page: 3

Somerville, Rebecca (Contd.)

0

0

Level SLevel 7 Level 8 Level 9 Level 10 Level 11

0 0 0 0 0

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

400

<< End of Transcript >>

Credit Points Summary:

Official Authorisation of Transcript

Unknown

00Transferred Credit Totals:

0040120120120UWS Totals:

0020606060ECTS Points:

Grand Total:

00040120120120Total Credit:

Note: During session 2007/08 the University changed its credit structure from 15 to 20 credits per module. This may have resulted in a credit deficit of 5 credit points for the achievement of the award named in this document. The University's Senate agreed in June 2008 that a 5 credit deficit, as a result of the changing credit structure, should not prohibit the conferment of the award. The 5 credit deficit does not affect the quality or standard of the award, as appropriate mapping of content and outcomes has taken place for all awards during session 2007/08.

Your Academic Transcript Explained Page: 4

Marking and Grading Scheme

All student work that contributes to a module mark and grade is assessed according to the following standard marking and grading scheme:+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+¦ Grade ¦ Numerical ¦Definition ¦ Descriptor ¦¦ ¦ range (%) ¦ ¦ ¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ A1 ¦90-100 ¦Exceptional ¦Student work is exemplary and exceeds the threshold ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦standard by a significant margin. It displays exceptional ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦knowledge and understanding; insight, originality and ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦exceptional ability in analysis, evaluation, problem ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦solving or other process skills; very high ability in ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦professional practice skills (where relevant) including ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦evidence of high degree of almost complete autonomy and ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦independent judgement relative to threshold expectations. ¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ A2 ¦80-89 ¦Outstanding ¦Student work significantly exceeds the threshold standard. ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦It displays a consistently thorough, deep and extensive ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦knowledge and understanding; originality and/or very high ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ability in analysis, evaluation, problem solving or other ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦process skills; very high ability in professional practice ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦skills (where relevant) including evidence of high degree ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦of autonomy and independent judgement relative to threshold ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦expectations. ¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ A3 ¦70-79 ¦Excellent ¦Student work very much exceeds the threshold standard. It ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦displays a consistently thorough, deep and/or extensive ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦knowledge and understanding; originality and/or very high ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ability in analysis, evaluation, problem solving or other ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦process skills; very high ability in professional practice ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦skills (where relevant) including evidence of high degree ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦of autonomy and independent judgement relative to threshold ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦expectations. ¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ B1 ¦60-69 ¦Very good ¦Student work is well above the threshold standard. It ¦¦ ¦ ¦Commendable ¦displays a consistently very good level of knowledge and ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦understanding; high ability in analysis, evaluation, ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦problem solving or other process skills; high ability in ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦professional practice skills (where relevant) including ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦exercise of significant independent judgement relative to ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦threshold expectations. ¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ B2 ¦50-59 ¦Good ¦Student work is clearly above the threshold standard. It ¦¦ ¦ ¦Highly competent ¦displays generally good knowledge and understanding; good ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ability in analysis, evaluation, problem solving or other ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦process skills; evidences highly competent performance of ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦professional practice skills (where relevant). ¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ C ¦40-49 ¦Satisfactory ¦Student work is at the threshold standard. It displays ¦¦ ¦ ¦Competent ¦generally satisfactory knowledge and understanding in most ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦key respects; competence in analysis and most other process ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦skills; evidences competent performance of professional ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦practice skills (where relevant). ¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ D ¦30-39 ¦Unsatisfactory ¦Student work is marginally below the threshold standard. It ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦displays some knowledge and understanding but this is ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦incomplete or partial; limited ability in analysis and ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦other process skills; evidences lack of or partial ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦competence in professional practice skills (where relevant).¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ E ¦1-29 ¦Very ¦Student work is well below the threshold standard. It ¦¦ ¦ ¦unsatisfactory ¦displays very limited knowledge and understanding; ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦evidences very limited or no analytical or other process ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦skills; very limited competence over the range of ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦professional practice skills. ¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ N ¦0 ¦No work to assess¦There is no work to be assessed. ¦+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Continued Overleaf

UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST of SCOTLAND : Your Academic Transcript Explained (cont) Page: 5

Note:

1. Prior to session 2014/15, Grades A1, A2 and A3 were amalgamated into a single Grade A, details as follows: +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+¦ Grade ¦ Numerical ¦Definition ¦ Descriptor ¦¦ ¦ range (%) ¦ ¦ ¦+-------+-----------+-----------------+------------------------------------------------------------¦¦ A ¦70-100 ¦Excellent ¦Student work very much exceeds the threshold standard. It ¦¦ ¦ ¦Outstanding ¦displays a consistently thorough, deep and/or extensive ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦knowledge and understanding; originality and/or very high ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ability in analysis, evaluation, problem solving or other ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦process skills; very high ability in professional practice ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦skills (where relevant) including evidence of high degree ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦of autonomy and independent judgement relative to threshold ¦¦ ¦ ¦ ¦expectations. ¦+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ 2. Prior to session 2007/08, Grade C was recorded as Grade C1. Grade C2 was used to indicate a Pass after compensation had been applied.

The following grades are used in exceptional circumstances where required by professional bodies:Grade Definition Descriptor

Pass Pass Student has met the criteria for 'pass' as specifically defined in the module descriptor

Fail Fail Student has not met the criteria for 'pass' as specifically defined in the module descriptor

Trimester / Semester StructureT1 / SM1 Trimester 1 / Semester 1 : September to January

T2 / SM2 Trimester 2 / Semester 2 : February to May

T3 Trimester 3 : June to August

SMR Resit diet : examined in August or Summer School : June to August

Documents

Rebeccas Tramscript