Upload
lamcong
View
224
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Task D-9
Energy Situation and Base Case Scenario
North Sumatera Province
final draft
2 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
CONVERSION OF ENERGY UNIT TO BOE
Type of Energy Origin Unit Multiplier to BOE
Coal Coal *) Ton 4,0000 Coal Briquette *) Ton 3,5000 Biomass Charcoal *) M3 1,0000 Wood *) M3 0,5000 Natural Gas Natural Gas MSCF 0,1796 Natural Gas M3 0,0063 LPG Ton 8,5246 Crude Oil Condensat Barrel 0,9545 Crude Oil Barrel 1,0000 Oil Product Avgas KiloLiter 5,5530 Avtur KiloLiter 5,8907 Gasoline KiloLiter 5,8275 Kerosene KiloLiter 5,9274 Automotive Diesel Oil KiloLiter 6,4871 Industrial Diesel Oil KiloLiter 6,6078 Fuel Oil KiloLiter 6,9612 Geothermal MWh 1,5937 Hydropower MWh 1,5937 Electricity MWh 0,6130 Source: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, except *) are estimation
3 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Glossary
BBL Barrel
BPS Board of Statistic Center ( Badan Pusat Statistik)
Elasticity of Energyy Final Use
Growth of final use Activity divided by growth of GRDP
Final Energy Energy that is used at consumer point
Primary Energy Energy in the first form or in the original form in nature
Secondary Energy Energy that is derivated of processed from primary energy
Poverty Line Minimum physical basic need per capita, consist of food 2,100 calory/capita/day, clothes, transportation, school,and other basic need; note that the value is different from one place to the other.
GWh Giga Watt hour
Intensity The specific amount of energy for each activity unit
KL Kilo litre
Kmc Kilo meter circuit
kV kilo Volt
kVA kilo Volt Ampere
kW kilo Watt
MBBL Million Barrel
MMBTU Million British Thermal Unit
MMSCF Million Standard Cubic Feet
MSCF Million Standard Cubic Feet
MSCFD Million Standard Cubic Feet per Day
MMSTB Million Stock Tank Barrel
MSTB Thousand Stock Tank Barrel
MVA Mega Volt Ampere
MW Mega Watt
MWe Mega Watt electric
MWh Mega Watt hour
GRDP Gross Regional Domestic Product, That is the total out put of economy from a region
Electrification Ratio The number of electrified households divided by total number of households
BOE Barrel of Oil Equivalent
Susenas Sensus of National Social Economy
Wp ADO IDO FO PT
Watt peak Automotive Diesel Oil Industrial Diesel Oil Fuel Oil Prefix for stated owned companies
4 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Chapter 1
General Information of the Region
1.1 Introduction
There are roughly 12.3 million people in the North Sumatra Province, which is mainly a
rural area, except for the city of Medan (pop. approx. 5 million). Some 500,000 people
live under the poverty line and do not have access to electricity. Approximately 86% of
the villages are connected to the grid; the household electrification ratio is 72.7%.
Sumatera Utara has an important role in the development of palm oil (15.7% or
1,023,350 ha). With its contribution in area equal to 15.7%, the contribution of crude
palm oil (CPO) is 21.3%. With private plantation amounting to 377,336.70 ha, community
plantation equal to 367,741.02 ha and 278,272.28 ha being the property of PT.
Perkebunan Nusantara. The production of biodiesel at this moment is 34 tons per day,
with 12 tons/day coming from PT. Pamina Energy & PT. Perkebunan Nusantara 4,
and 22 tons/day coming from private companies.
The other renewable energy sources in North Sumatra are geothermal, mini hydro and
large scale hydropower.
During the past years several initiatives have been under taken to formally
establish the regional energy forum and regional technical team, but so far the regional
government has not given its official approval. The regional technical team is very
important to be established and the University of Sumatera Utara tries to convince the
regional government to support the establishment.
1.2 Macro- and socio economic
1.2.1 Geographic
The North Sumatera Province is located at 1°- 4° latitude and 98°– 100° longitude.
Total land area of North Sumatera Province is 71,680 km2. It borders Aceh provinceien
on the northwest and Riau and West Sumatra provinceien on the southeast. The map
of North Sumatera Province is shown in Figure 1.1.
5 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Source: Wikipedia
Figure 1.1 Map of North Sumatera Province
The province contains a broad, low plain along the Strait of Malacca coast; in the
northeast; the provincial capital, Medan, is located here. In the south and west, the
land rises to the mountain range that runs the length of Sumatra; the mountains here
are dominated by Lake Toba. Several large islands in the Indian Ocean off the
southwest coast of Sumatra are part of North Sumatra, most notably Nias, Tanah Bala,
Tanah Masa, and Pini.
1.2.2 Urban/Rural
1.2.2.1 Regencies and Cities
In 2005, North Sumatera Province was divided into 18 regencies (kabupaten) and 7
cities (kota); 328 subdistricts (kecamatan); 5,086 villages (desa) and 382 villages in city
regions (kelurahan). The regencies/cities and its capitals are listed in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 Regencies/Cities in North Sumatera Province
No. Regency (R)/City (C) Capital
1 Tapanuli Tengah (R) Sibolga
2 Tapanuli Utara (R) Tarutung
3 Tapanuli Selatan (R) Padang Sidempuan
4 Nias (R) Gunungsitoli
5 Langkat (R) Stabat
6 Karo (R) Kabanjahe
7 Deli Serdang (R) Lubukpakam
8 Simalungun (R) Pematangsiantar
9 Asahan (R) Kisaran
6 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
10 Labuhan Batu (R) Rantauprapat
11 Dairi (R) Sidikalang
12 Toba Samosir (R) Balige
13 Mandailing Natal (R) Penyabungan
14 Nias Selatan (R) Teluk Dalam
15 Pakpak Bharat (R) Salak
16 Humbang Hasundutan (R) Dolok Sanggul
17 Samosir (R) Panguruan
18 Serdang Bedagai (R) Sei Rampah
19 Medan (C) -
20 Pematangsiantar (C) -
21 Sibolga (C) -
22 Tanjung Balai (C) -
23 Binjai (C) -
24 Tebing Tinggi (C) -
25 Padang Sidempuan (C) - Source: BPS of North Sumatera Province, 2007
In 2008, following administrative and political evolutions, there are three new
regencies in North Sumatera Province, i.e. Regency of Batu Bara (the capital is Lima
Puluh), Regency of Padang Lawas Utara (the capital is Gunung Tua), and Regency of
Padang Lawas (the capital is Sibuhuan).
1.2.2.2Population
Total population of North Sumatera Province in 2005 was 12,326,678 persons; with the
number of household being 2,717,020 households; and the average household size
was 4.54 persons per household. The most populated city in North Sumatera is Medan,
in which the population in 2005 was 2,036,185 persons or 16.5% of total province.
Medan is also the fourth largest city in Indonesia. The average density in this province
was 172 persons/km2. The population growth of this province during 2000 – 2005 was
1.35% per year. In Table 1.2, population and density of each regency/city of North
Sumatera Province in 2005 are given.
7 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Table 1.2 Population of North Sumatera Province in 2005
No Regency/City Population
(persons)
Number of
Households
Area
(km2)
Density
(person/km2)
Regency
1 Nias 441,807 81,918 3,495.39 126
2 Mandailing Natal 386,150 86,346 6,618.79 58
3 Tapanuli Selatan 626,702 138,030 12,138.30 52
4 Tapanuli Tengah 283,035 59,558 2,188.00 129
5 Tapanuli Utara 256,201 56,437 3,726.52 69
6 Toba Samosir 158,677 39,792 2,474.40 64
7 Labuhan Batu 951,773 207,119 9,223.18 103
8 Asahan 1,024,369 224,246 4,580.75 224
9 Simalungun 826,101 196,071 4,386.60 188
10 Dairi 261,287 58,718 1,927.80 136
11 Karo 316,207 83,344 2,127.29 149
12 Deli Serdang 1,569,638 348,728 2,407.96 652
13 Langkat 970,433 222,346 6,263.30 155
14 Nias Selatan 288,233 53,249 1,825.20 158
15 Humbang Hasundutan 152,997 33,702 2,335.33 66
16 Pakpak Bharat 34,542 7,763 1,218.30 28
17 Samosir 131,073 28,463 2,069.05 63
18 Serdang Bedagai 588,176 133,431 1,989.98 296
City
19 Sibolga 88,717 18,731 10.77 8,237
20 Tanjung Balai 152,814 31,390 60.52 2,525
21 Pematang Siantar 230,487 51,599 79.99 2,881
22 Tebing Tinggi 135,671 30,629 37.99 3,571
23 Medan 2,036,185 422,922 265.10 7,681
24 Binjai 237,904 52,000 90.33 2,634
25 Padang Sidempuan 177,499 50,488 140.00 1,268
Total Province 12,326,678 2,717,020 71,680.84 172 Source: BPS of North Sumatera Province, 2005
1.2.3 Macroeconomic Condition
The Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) of North Sumatera Province in 2005 was
Rp 87,897.8 billion (around USD 9.3 billion), and GRDP per capita was Rp 7,33 million
(around USD 756) per person per year see Tabel 1.3. There are three sectors that have
8 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
the largest contribution in this province, ie. agriculture, manufacturing industry, and
commercial sector. These three sectors contributed 67% to the total GRDP. The GRDP
per sector/activity of North Sumatera Province in 2000 – 2005 is shown in Table 1.4.
Tabel 1.3 GRDP by Regency/City in 2005
No Regency/City GRDP
(Billion Rp) GRDP/Capita
(million Rp/cap/yr)
Regency
1 Nias 1.552,60 3,51
2 Mandailing Natal 1.492,09 3,86
3 Tapanuli Selatan 2.584,57 4,12
4 Tapanuli Tengah 889,37 3,14
5 Tapanuli Utara 1.232,29 4,81
6 Toba Samosir 1.354,44 8,54
7 Labuhan Batu 8.533,06 8,97
8 Asahan 9.768,12 9,54
9 Simalungun 4.370,08 5,29
10 Dairi 1.634,14 6,25
11 Karo 2.600,53 8,22
12 Deli Serdang 10.785,18 6,87
13 Langkat 5.724,01 5,90
14 Nias Selatan 1.000,49 3,47
15 Humbang Hasundutan 763,54 4,99
16 Pakpak Barat 126,68 3,67
17 Samosir 843,74 6,44
18 Serdang Bedagai 3.379,77 5,75
City
19 Sibolga 563,74 6,35
20 Tanjung Balai 1.142,13 7,47
21 Pematang Siantar 1.649,97 7,16
22 Tebing Tinggi 876,39 6,46
23 Medan 25.271,63 12,41
24 Binjai 1.540,91 6,48
25 Padang Sidempuan 702,10 3,96
Total 87 897,80 7,33
9 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Table 1.4 GRDP sector/activity of North Sumatera Province in 2001 – 2005
GRDP (Constant 2005 million Rp) No Sector
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1 Agriculture 19,683,516 20,182,424 20,689,486 21,465,423 22,191,305
2 Mining 1,151,889 1,146,165 1,130,654 1,009,921 1,074,751
3 Manufacture Industry 17,618,404 18,504,467 19,298,237 20,231,995 21,197,443
4 Utility 585,702 626,848 660,798 681,199 716,251
5 Construction 4,008,850 4,278,720 4,536,031 4,883,081 5,515,982
6 Commercial Service 13,292,558 13,951,004 14,353,390 15,230,316 15,984,925
7 Transportation 4,767,714 5,346,583 5,905,555 6,702,179 7,379,922
8 Financial Service 4,210,419 4,445,815 4,749,771 5,077,295 5,440,497
9 Other Services 6,509,307 6,707,117 7,481,688 7,942,505 8,288,790
Total 71,908,359 75,189,141 78,805,609 83,328,949 87,897,791
Source: BPS of North Sumatera Province, 2005
Average GRDP growth during 2000 – 2005 was 4.76% per year, and average inflation in
the same period was 11.56% (see Tabel 1.5). But this inflation was not a normal
inflation. This inflation was mainly caused by the increase of domestic oil fuel price,
especially in 2005 when the domestic oil fuel price increased by around 150%.
Table 1.5 GRDP Growth and Inflation of North Sumatera Province in 2000 – 2005
No 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1 GRDP Growth (%) 3.72 4.07 4.81 5.74 5.48
2 Inflation (%) 14.79 9.59 4.23 6.80 22.41
1.2.3.1 Household
Household is divided into 2 areas namely urban and rural and further divided in 4 categories based on the poverty line as follows :
- Category A : Under Poverty Line - Category B : Under 1.5X Poverty Line - Category C : Middle Income - Category D : 20% Highest Income
From the tri-annual Susenas census data, it appears that the population in the higher income categories in urban is increasing and the lower income population becomes less (middle income is 54.63 %) but in rural area the poorer population becomes bigger and
10 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
also the 20 % highest income become higher (Tabel 1.6). This condition is caused by the increasing domestic fuel prices. The amount of rural inhabitants is larger then the urban residents in almost all income classes, only the middle class shows for some years a majority of urban people.
Tabel 1.6 Population by Income Category
Population (person) Area Income Category
1999 2002 2005
Urban Under Poverty Line 890,177 675,253 403,880
Under 1.5X Poverty Line 1,692,894 1,732,964 1,113,296
Middle Income 1,604,569 1,766,290 2,854,850
20% Highest Income 770,678 790,308 853,590
Sub Total 4,958,319 4,964,815 5,225,616
Rural Under Poverty Line 990,225 1,211,646 1,585,665
Under 1.5X Poverty Line 2,311,103 2,016,237 2,361,282
Middle Income 1,365,888 2,784,327 2,110,713
20% Highest Income 1,750,206 892,667 1,043,402
Sub Total 6,417,421 6,904,877 7,101,062
1.2.3.2 Commercial. Data for the Commercial sector are taken from the annual industry census in 2001 – 2005. The value added for the largest contributor restaurant is 47.69 % and value added for social service as second is 26.20 % (Tabel 1.7). This means that primarily food and other personnal service enjoy a stable and increasing business. The small contribution of lodging, and amusement sevices mean that there is not so much tourism (national and international) coming to Sumatera Utara.
Tabel 1.7 Value Added of Commercial Sector Value Added (Constant 2005 Million Rp)
No Subsector 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1 Hotel and Lodging 222,750
249,803
231,186
248,141
249,752
2 Restaurant 11,849,510
12,391,600
12,721,457
13,495,695
14,172,973
3 Trading 1,220,298
1,309,600
1,400,748
1,486,480
1,562,200
4 Financial & Business Service 4,210,419
4,445,815
4,749,771
5,077,295
5,440,497
5 Amusement Service 410,255
427,505
455,448
479,928
503,613
6 Social Service 6,099,051
6,279,612
7,026,240
7,462,578
7,785,178
Total 24,012,284
25,103,936
26,584,849
28,250,117
29,714,213
Source: BPS, North Sumatera in Numbers 2006
11 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
1.2.3.3 Industry
The highest industrial added value in Sumatera Utara is from food production and
processing, at approximatly 61.18 % of the total value added of manufacturing
industry. Second is chemistry with about 18.97 %. The annual increase rate of value
added is similar for almost all industrial subsectors (Tabel 1.8) amounting to 4.86% on
average.
Tabel 1.8 Value Added of Manufacture Industry Sector Value Added (Constant 2005 Million Rp)
No Subsector 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1 Food 10,548,792
11,135,106
11,684,565
12,365,022
12,968,530
2 Textile 114,305
115,152
115,334
118,987
123,523
3 Wood 1,117,581
1,116,208
1,146,956
1,191,832
1,246,759
4 Paper 155,834
148,677
156,052
160,922
165,086
5 Chemistry 3,342,370
3,526,384
3,664,470
3,848,926
4,021,194
6 Non Metal 765,297
798,350
841,748
868,237
917,097
7 Metal 967,120
1,053,053
1,066,468
1,123,768
1,162,385
8 Machinery 500,213
478,805
488,979
522,737
559,224
9 Others 23,402
30,383
31,470
31,564
33,644
Total 17,534,913
18,402,119
19,196,043
20,231,995
21,197,443
Source: BPS, North Sumatera in Numbers 2006 1.2.3.4 Transportation The number of vechicles for transportation increased significantly between 2001 and 2005. The average annual growth of motocycle is 19.9 % and growth of aviation is very high averaging 32.9 % annually. The average annual growth of train is lower at just 1.8 % (Tabel 1.9). It shows that growth in the utilisation of public transportation is quite low and the utilisation of motocycle is very high. From of this kind of utilisation results the amount of energy consumption especially Gasoline becomes the most important fuel.
12 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Tabel 1.9 Transportation No Type of Mode 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1 Passenger Car (unit) 169,741 180,521 192,596 207,614 226,043
2 Motorcycle (unit) 952,361 1,084,051 1,300,995 1,568,048 1,864,980
3 Bus (unit) 26,035 26,566 27,106 27,621 28,160
4 Truck (unit) 128,985 135,838 144,233 154,420 166,221
5 Train (million rupiah) 2,430 2,490 2,540 2,580 2,600
6 Ferry (million rupiah) 35,017 36,164 40,175 42,681 43,789
7 Ship (million rupiah) 25,143 24,316 29,390 27,474 28,487
8 Aeroplane (million rupiah) 697,766 964,633 1,264,096 1,830,823 1,932,133 Source: BPS, North Sumatera in Numbers 2006
1.2.3.5 Others.
The growth of the value added of subsectors agriculture, mining and construction is
similar for all three with the average annual growth for agriculture, the most important
subsector, at 3.04 %. The total average annual growth for the other sectors is 3.668 %
(Tabel 1.10).
Tabel 1.10 Value Added of Other Sector Value Added (Constant 2005 Million Rp)
No Subsector 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1 Agriculture
19,683,516
20,182,424
20,689,486
21,465,423 22,191,305
2 Mining
1,151,889
1,146,165
1,130,654
1,009,921 1,074,751
3 Construction
4,088,850
4,278,720
4,536,031
4,883,081 5,515,982
Total 24,924,256
25,607,308
26,356,171
27,358,426
28,782,038
Source: BPS, North Sumatera in Numbers 2006
13 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Chapter 2
Primary Energy Supply
2.1 Oil and Oil Product
North Sumatera Province has oil reserves for an amount of 45.28 MMSTB in 2005
which consists of 34.90 MMSTB for proven reserve and 10.38 MMSTB for potential.
These numbers correspond to 0.5% of the national total oil reserve or 0.8% of the
national proven oil reserves. Most oil reserves in North Sumatera are found onshore,
that is Rantau Field near to Pangkalan Brandan Oil Refinery. The oil reserves in North
Sumatera are shown in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Oil Reserves 2005
Reserves (MSTB) Location
Proven Potential Total
Langkat 19,466.00 10,194.00 29,660.00
Deli Serdang 7,551.00 58.68 7,609.68
Binjai 5,207.00 - 5,207.00
Medan 674.1 128.1 802.2
Tapanuli Selatan 2,000.00 - 2,000.00
Total 34,898.10 10,380.78 45,278.88 Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
There were 11 oil companies active in North Sumatera Province in 2005, but most of
them are still in the field development stage. Pertamina is the largest oil company in
the upstream oil business in North Sumatera. A list of oil companies in North Sumatera
is shown in Table 2.2.
Table 2.2 Oil Company in 2005
Production Capacity No Company Regency
Oil (BOPD) Gas (MSCFD)
1 Pertamina DOH Sumbagut Langkat 2,200 80
2 Japex NS (Costa) Langkat 200 12
3 PT.Putra Kencana Diski Petroleum Deli Serdang 10 -
4 PT.Putra Batumandi Petroleum Langkat - - 5 Putra Kencana Basilam Petrogas Langkat - - 6 PT Eksindo Petroleum Langkat - - 7 PT.Caltex Pasific Tapsel - - 8 PT.Caltex Pasific Ind. Kisaran Lab.Batu Lab. Batu - - 9 PT. Sinopec Langkat - -
10 Matrix Oil Asahan Off Shore - - 11 PT. Gunakarsa Glagah Kambuna Energi Off Shore - -
Total 2,410 92
Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
14 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
2.2 Natural Gas
The total natural gas reserves in North Sumatera Province in 2005 were 464.4 BSCF,
with 380.6 BCF of it proven reserve. This is 0.25% of the national total natural gas
reserve and 0.39% of the national proven natural gas reserve. The location of natural
gas reserve in North Sumatera is associated with the oil field (Rantau field). Natural gas
reserves data is shown in Table 2.3.
Table 2.3 Natural Gas Reserves 2005
Reserves (MMSCF) Location
Proven Potential Total
Langkat 233,591 80,690 314,281
Deli Serdang 143,065 - 143,065
Binjai 38 - 38
Medan 3,933 3,130 7,063
Total 380,627 83,820 464,447 Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
Natural gas production in North Sumatera Province from Rantau field (Pertamina) in
2005 was 8 MMSCF, decreasing from previous years because the contents of the well
in Rantau field has decreased. Beside this, there is also natural gas production by other
companies.
2.3 Coal
North Sumatera Province has only few amounts of coal reserves, and all of that are still
listed as potential reserve. Most of coal reserves in North Sumatera are found on Nias
Island. Coal reserve in North Sumatera Province in 2005 is shown in Table 2.4. There is
no coal production in this province.
Table 2.4 Coal Reserve 2005
Reserves (ton) No Location
Proven Potential
1 Langkat - 1,800,000
2 Labuhan Batu - 1,000,000
3 Tapanuli Tengah - 4,300,000
4 Tapanuli Selatan - 1,000,000
5 Nias - 20,000,000
Total - 28,100,000 Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
15 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
2.4 Hydropower
Installed Hydropower capacity amount to 91 MW in Renun and Sipan and 6,5 MW
miicro hydro (in the energy profile a total amount of hydro power is mentioned at
212,5 MW, but the PLN-grid-connected capacity is only 97,5 MW, the rest of the hydro
power is in remote locations and certain hydro power plants can not produce
electricity anymore because of water supply problems from deforestation). The
potential in North Sumatera Province is much larger at 3,051 MW; it consists of 3,031
MW of large hydro power, 13.89 MW of mini hydro power, and 6.03 MW of micro
hydro power. The top 5 regions that have hydropower potential are: Regency of
Tapanuli Utara (31%), Regency of Asahan (19%), Regency of Mandailing Natal (19%),
Regency of Langkat (15%), and Regency of Tapanuli Selatan (8%). Hydro power
potential in North Sumatera Province is shown in Table 2.5
Table 2.5 Hydro Potential 2005
Type Potential (kW)
Large – hydro 3,031,300
Mini hydro 13,890
Micro hydro 6,035
Total 3,051,225 Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
2.5 Geothermal
North Sumatera Province has a relatively large geothermal potency, the reserve is 2
GW and the total resource is 3.67 GW. These numbers are 11.67% of national
geothermal reserve and 11.19% of national geothermal resource. The geothermal
resources in North Sumatera Province are distributed over 4 regencies, ie. : Regency of
Tapanuli Selatan (1,846 MW, 50%), Regency of Tapanuli Utara (1,345 MW, 37%),
Regency of Karo (258 MW, 7%), and Regency of Simalungun (225 MW, 6%), the
geothermal potential in North Sumatera Province in 2005 is shown in Table 2.6
Geothermal potency is already utilized in North Sumatera, although in very small
capacity. The since existing geothermal power plant is in Sibayak, Regency of Karo,
with a capacity of 2 x 5,5 MW. Currently, Sarulla geothermal power plant in Regency of
Tapanuli Utara is being in construction stage. The Sarulla geothermal power plant will
have a capacity of 110 MW, and is planned to be operational in 2010.
16 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Table 2.6 Geothermal Potential 2005
Location Regency
Installed
Capacity
(MW)
Reserves
(MW)
Resources
(MW)
Total
(MW)
Lau Debuk-Debuk Sibayak Karo 2 x 5,5 161 70 233
Marike Karo - - 25 25
Dolok Merawan Simalungun - - 225 225
Pusuk Buhit, DanauToba Tapanuli Utara - - 225 225
Simbolon Samosir Tapanuli Utara - - 225 225
Pagaran Tapanuli Utara - - 225 225
Hela Toba Tapanuli Utara - - 25 25
Sarulla Tapanuli Utara - 335 100 435
Namorailangit Tapanuli Utara - 210 - 210
Sipoholon Ria-Ria Tapanuli Selatan - - 225 225
Sibual-Buali Tapanuli Selatan - 556 - 556
Sibuhuan Tapanuli Selatan - - 100 100
S.Merapi-Sampuraga Tapanuli Selatan - 420 - 420
Sampuraga Tapanuli Selatan - - 225 225
Robuan Tapanuli Selatan - 320 - 320
Total 11 2,002 1,670 3,674
Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
2.6 Other Renewable Energy
Other renewable energy in North Sumatera Province that is already utilized is solar
energy or solar photovoltaic. Solar energy utilization in this province is developed
through government programmes. The total installed capacity of solar photovoltaic in
North Sumatera is 27.1 kW.
In Table 2.7 and 2.8, biomass and biogas potential in North Sumatera Province in 2005
are presented. Utilization of biomass and biogas has not been recorded yet.
17 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Table 2.7 Biomass Potential 2005
Biomass Potential (Ton) Regency/City
Rice Husk Coconut Shell Oil Palm Shell Sugar Cane Waste
Deli Serdang 714,661.0 3,695.0 486,195.0 144,409.0
Karo 13,194.0 - - -
Simalungun 9,989,6 - 19,312,2 -
Pakpak 31,755.0 159.0 5,216.0 -
Pakpak Bharat 65,356.0 5,089,2 70,422.1 -
Asahan 1,062.0 2,743.0 - -
Tanjung Balai 47.7 287,418.0 69,467.7 -
Labuhan 89,761.2 252.8 2,303.3
Labuhan Batu 74,816,5 - - -
Tapanuli Selatan 87,634.0 88.0 1,220.0 -
Tapanuli Utara 61,717.0 4,729.0 381.6 96,000.0
Total 1,065,187.8 298,832.0 632,520.8 240,409.0
Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
Table 2.8 Biogas Potential 2005
Potential of Biogas from Cattle Waste (ton) Regency/City
Cow Lamb Pig Buffalo
Medan 21,516 21,256 4,660 4,228
Deli Serdang 173,544 56,150 71,999 50,631
Karo 91,773 13,599 51,589 168,690
Simalungun 40,344 669,545 30,536 570,756
Dairi 7,918 3,342 50,974 40,707
Pakpak Barat 865 2,241 4,480 22,445
Asahan 89,085 146,172 61,104 53,327
Tanjung Balai 183 2,828 453 335
Labuhan Batu 40,403 50,605 29,528 10,665
Tapanuli Utara 52,493 22,489 644,993 474,826
Humbang Hasundutan 2,328 1,899 21,633 85,715
Tapanuli Tengah 5,412 9,996 56,099 73,913
Tapanuli Selatan 216,572 42,819 - 340,384
Nias 5,989 7,539 240,860 5,562
Total 748,425 1,050,480 1,268,908 1,902,184
Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
18 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Chapter 3
Transformation
3.1 Electricity generation
The largest power plant in Sumatera Utara using combined cycle technology amounts
to 57.13 % of the total power plant capacity of 1,270.69 MW. At the moment steam
power plant covers 15.96 %, mini hydro power plant is spread in remote areas (Tabel
3.1).
Tabel 3.1 Capacity and Location of Power Plants
No Type of Plantcombine
cycle Location Installed Capacity (MW) Rated Capacity (MW)
1 Diesel PP Belawan 24.85 21.20
2 Steam PP Belawan 260.00 203.00
3 Gas Turbine PP Belawan 123.13 96.00
4 Combined Cycle PP Belawan 817.88 726.00
5 Hydro/Microhydro PP Pandan 213.12 212.50
6 Diesel PP 15.72 11.99
Total 1,454.69 1,270.69
Source: State of Electricy Company of North Sumatera Province
The amount of fuel used in at the power plants is dominated by Industrial Diesel Oil
(73.49%) in 2005 which is increasing compared to the years before and second
utilisation fuel is FO (25.38 %), the other fuel for power plants is Natural gas (Tabel
3.2).
19 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Tabel 3.2. Type of Plant and Fuel Type
Fuel Consumption No
Type of
Plant
Fuel
Type Unit
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1 Steam PP FO Liter 263,541,887 280,993,473 342,960,149 306,074,359 323,471,576
2 Steam PP
Natural
Gas MMBtu 120,954 44,785 18,981 166,130 328,057
3
Combined
Cycle PP ADO Liter 207,908,856 380,611,401 507,506,094 650,016,027 773,159,060
4
Combined
Cycle PP
Natural
Gas MMBtu 24,998,638 21,790,528 17,919,765 18,882,744 13,929,994
5
Gas
Turbine
PP ADO Liter 58,040,900 80,684,600 54,497,900 55,702,958 134,990,100
6 Diesel PP ADO Liter 9,785,563 14,972,471 10,789,410 14,417,879 19,704,471
7
Diesel PP
Isolated ADO Liter 7,170,354 7,963,165 8,651,745 9,448,374 8,439,798
Total
HSD Liter 282,905,673 484,231,637 581,445,149 729,585,238 936,293,429
Total
FO Liter 263,541,887 280,993,473 342,960,149 306,074,359 323,471,576
Total
Natural
Gas MMBtu 25,119,592 21,835,313 17,938,746 19,048,874 14,258,051
Source: State of Electricy Company of North Sumatera Province
3.2 Electricity grid
Sumatera Utara transmission line uses an interconnected 150 kV line passing several
substations with a lenght of 3,274 kmc. It is also directly coupled to Inalum (hydro
power plant to supply bauxite smelter) with 275 kV voltage (substation 275/150 kV).
The distribution line to serve the consumers uses the 20 kV and futher using the
distribution transformer (20 kV/380/220 V). (Tabel 3.3)
Tabel 3.3 Electricity grid
No Line Type Length (kmc)
1 High Voltage 150 kV 3,274
2 Intermediate Voltage 20 kV 21,659
3 Low Voltage 380/220 V 22,466
Source: State of Electricy Company of North Sumatera Province
The transmission losses are 2.35 % and distribution losses are 13.5 % at 2005.
3.3 Refinery .
Pangkalan Berandan is a crude oil refinery which is supplied with crude from Rantau
and but the last production year for this refinery is 2005 (Tabel 3.4 and 3.5).
20 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Tabel 3.4 Oil Refinary
No Refinery Name Company Location Capacity
(MBBL/Year)
1 P.Berandan Pertamina P.Berandan 1,825
Total 1,825
Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
Tabel 3.5 Production of Refinery
Production (KL/Year) No
Refinery Name
Type of Product 2001 2002 2003 2004
1 P.Berandan Oil Fuel 84,556.20 88,722.00 89,517.00 80,795.61
Kerosene - - - 48,659.04
Automotive Diesel Oil - - - 22,741.18
Fuel Oil - - - 9,395.40
Non Oil Fuel: 64,808.40 67,241.10 63,377.40 81,888.90
LPG - - - 21,294.00
Others - - - 60,594.90
Total 149,364.60 155,963.10 152,894.40 162,684.51
Source: Mining and Energy Office of North Sumatera Province
3.4 Others
Coal bricket in Sumatera Utara entirely is imported (coming from Jambi, Sumatera
Barat and Kalimantan) , also LPG is entirely imported from Jawa.
21 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Chapter 4
Final Energy Consumption
4.1 Final energy by fuel
The final energy consumption of 25.5 million BOE is dominated by oil products (80%)
which on its turn are dominated by gasoline and Automotive Diesel Oil (ADO). These
are mainly used in transport (Figure 4.1 and 4.2). Electricity takes about 11% and
Natural gas and Biomass (mainly wood) take each about 4-5%.
Figure 4.1 Final Energy in SumUt 2005
Figure 4.2 Final Energy Consumption in SumUt 2005
22 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Oil products are consumed mostly in the transport sector, but also households and
industry show a considerable use. The commercial and other sector consume each
about 1.5 million BOE. Electricity is mainly used in households, followed by industry
and commercial. Natural gas is almost exclusively used in industry, there is little use in
households and commercial, and wood is only used in households (Figure4.3).
Figure 4.3 Final Energy in SumUt 2005
4.2 Final energy by sector 4.2.1 Households urban/rural, Final energy consumption in households is dominated by Kerosene (49-54%), and both in rural and urban areas (Figure 4.4). Electricity is equally used but to a lesser extent (18-30%). The major differences occur for the other fuels; in rural areas wood is the second largest fuel whereas in urban areas LPG comes after electricity (Figure 4.5).
23 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Figure 4.4 Final Energy Household in SumUt 2005
Figure 4.5 Urban Final Energy in SumUt 2005
24 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Figure 4.6 Rural Final Energy in SumUt 2005
Looking at the fuel consumption per income class, differences between similar classes in urban and rural area appear in both level and composition. So is wood used in all income classes in rural areas while LPG is used in the two highest urban income classes C and D – obviously since it is more expensive as shown at Figure 4.7.
Figure 4.7 Final Energy Consumption in SumUt 2005
25 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
4.2.2 COMMERCIAL
Of the oil products, Kerosene is dominating the commercial consumption at 38.9%,
followed by electricity with 28.7% and Automotive Diesel Oil (ADO, 21.7%). Usage of
LPG and natural gas is not high in the commercial sector (Figure 4.8).
Most of Automative Diesel Oil is used by hotel, trading and financial services compared
with LPG which mainly used by restaurants as cooking fuel as is show in Figure 4.9.
Figure 4.8 Commercial Final Energy Consumption in SumUt 2005
Figure 4.9 Commercial subsector Final Energy in Sumut 2005
26 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
27 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
28 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
4.2.3 Industry
Coal, Industrial Diesel Oil and LPG products are used by industry in a small quantity of
0.3 – 2.3%. Oil consumption is still dominated by Automotive Diesel Oil and Fuel Oil
(3,620,181BOE) and is followed by natural gas and electricity (Figure 4.10).
The biggest consumption of electricity occurs in others subsector and reaches 68.7%
(3,633 thousand BOE) (Figure 4.11).
Figure 4.10 Industrial Final Oil Consumption in SumUt 2005
Figure 4.11 Industrial Subsector Final Energy Consumption in SumUt 2005
29 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
30 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
31 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
32 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
4.2.4 Transportation
The most important fuel for transportation is Gasoline, more than half of the
utilisation of oil fuels (55.5% - 5,429.14 kBOE). This is mainly caused by the high
number of motocycles (Figure 4.12 – 4.13).
The increasing the number of vechicules also increases the utilisation of Automotive
Diesel Oil up to 36.6 % or 3,587.12 kBOE.
Air transport mainly consumes avtur, not so much avgas (0.003% of total transport
consumption)
Figure 4.12 Transportation Final Oil Consumption in SumUt 2005
33 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Figure 4.13 Transportation Subsector Final Energy in SumUt 2005
34 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
35 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
4.2.5 Others
The construction of buildings (housing, hotel, appartement, etc) uses Automotive
Diesel Oil to drive cranes and other equipment which use Automotive Diesel Oil with
quantities up to around 58% (895,6742 kBOE). Automotive Diesel Oil comsumption is
followed by Gasoline and Kerosene with 20,8% and 16% respectively. Fuel Oil is not used too
much as shown in Figure 4.14 – 4.15.
36 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Figure 4.14 Others Final Energy Consumption in SumUt 2005
Figure 4.15 Others Subsector Final Energy in SumUt 2005
37 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
38 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Chapter 5
Future development
5.1 Macro economic assumptions
In order to run the LEAP model we need an energy database containing the current
(2005) situation (supply , demand and fuel intensity) and forecasts, mainly demand
projectionsbased on elasticities related to key macro-economic drives.
The growth of Population, GRDP and elasticity of the sectors commercial, industry,
others and transportation for the Business as Usual case (BAU) in LEAP can be found in
Tabel 5.1
The fuel intensity value is determined by dividing the 2005 volume of fuel consumption
by the activity volume in each subsector (household, commercial, industry,
transportation and others).
The value of elasticity is the relation between averaged activity growths compared to
averaged regional GRDP growth. For some transport modes, also population growth
was taken into account to determine the vehicle amount growth projections. The
averaging was done over 2001-2005. A curve fitting approach was chosen to
determine the elasticity.
39 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Tabel 5.1 Growth of Population, GRDP, Elasticity Item Parameter
Population growth 1,35 %
GRDP growth 5,5 %
Elasticity
Industry 0,967 Growth AS (GRDP, average growth
2001-2005/average GRDP 2001-2005)
Commercial 1,089 PrevYearValue*(1+GRDP growth per
year* (average growth 2001-
2005/average GRDP 2001-2005))
Others 0,735 Growth AS (GRDP, average growth
2001-2005/average GRDP 2001-2005)
Transportation Elasticity
Car : Population : GDRP :
1,05 1,19
prevyearvalue*(1+ GRDP growth per
year*1,19)*(1+ Population growth per
year*1,05)
Motorcycle : Population : GDRP :
0,23 3,58
prevyearvalue*(1+ GRDP growth per
year*3,58)*(1+ Population growth per
year*0,23)
Bus : Population : GDRP :
1,25 0,07
prevyearvalue*(1+ GRDP growth per
year*0,07)*(1+ Population growth per
year*1,25)
Truck : Population : GDRP :
0,53 1,16
prevyearvalue*(1+ GRDP growth per
year*1,18)*(1+ Population growth per
year*0,53)
Train : Population : GDRP :
0,58 0,19
prevyearvalue*(1+ GRDP growth per
year*0,19)*(1+ Population growth per
year*0,58)
Ferry : Population : GDRP :
0,70 0,96
prevyearvalue*(1+ GRDP growth per
year*0,96)*(1+ Population growth per
year*0,70)
Ship : GDRP : 0,73 prevyearvalue*(1+ GRDP growth per
year*0,73)
Aviation : Population : GDRP :
0,90 5,65
prevyearvalue*(1+ GRDP growth per
year*5,65)*(1+ Population growth per
year*0,90)
40 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Note :
- Elasticity for Industry : when the growth of GRDP 1 % so the energy demand
will increase 0,967 %
- Elasticity for Commercial : when the growth of GRDP 1 % so the energy demand
will increase 1,089 %
- Elasticity for Others : when the growth of GRDP 1 % so the energy demand will
increase 0,735 %
- Elasticity Car : when the growth of Population 1 % so the energy demand will
increase 1,05 % and the growth of GRDP is 1% so the energy demand will
increase 1,19 %
- Elasticity Motorcycle : when the growth of Population 1 % so the energy
demand will increase 0,23 % and the growth of GRDP is 1% so the energy
demand will increase 3,58 %
- Elasticity Bus : when the growth of Population 1 % so the energy demand will
increase 1,25 % and the growth of GRDP is 1% so the energy demand will
increase 0,07 %
- Elasticity Truck : when the growth of Population 1 % so the energy demand will
increase 0,53 % and the growth of GRDP is 1% so the energy demand will
increase 1,16 %
- Elasticity Train : when the growth of Population 1 % so the energy demand will
increase 0,58 % and the growth of GRDP is 1% so the energy demand will
increase 0,19 %
- Elasticity Ferry : when the growth of Population 1 % so the energy demand will
increase 0,70 % and the growth of GRDP is 1% so the energy demand will
increase 0,96 %
- Elasticity Ship : when the growth of GRDP is 1% so the energy demand will
increase 0,73 %
- Elasticity Aviation : when the growth of Population 1 % so the energy demand
will increase 0,90 % and the growth of GRDP is 1% so the energy demand will
increase 5,65 %
5.2 Business as usual assumptions
The database used to forecast untill 2025 is based on the data of 2005 while
considering the growth of Population, GRDP and their relation to the growth of the
Residential, Commercial, Industry, Others and the Tansportation sector.
41 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Apart from assumptions based on observed trends in 2001-2005 for elasticties and
subsector shares in activity levels and constant 2005 values for fuel intensities, no
other assumptions have been included in the BAU scenario - even if there are signs
that they are part of energy policy (like switch to LPG in households because the
governement want to remove the subsidised Kerosene in 2012, or the introduction of
biofuels in transportation). Constant fuel intensities do not take into account
efficiency improvements or fuel substitution effects, nor do they take into account the
effect that with economic growth, the number of use of appliances may change. In
order to determine those, one need more detail on the kind of application fuels are
used, knowledge that is currently lacking.
On the supply side, the power sector only assumes short term capcity additions up till
2010-2012, longer term plans are considered too uncertain to be part of a BAU.
As such is the BAU a rather conservative approach, but illustrative for the development
of energy demand and supply under current circumstances. In the energy policy
scenarios (national and regional) to be developed, more attention will be given to
deepen the assumptions.
- Households : expected growth.
Population growth
Area 2005 2025
Urban 57.61 % 65 %
Rural 42.39 % 35 %
The trend of urban/rural population share is based on the decreasing number of
poorer population and increasing number of population in urban area as observed
over 1999 - 2005.
- Composition urban/rural per income class.
From the same data, the following trends for the share of the four income classes per
area can be determined: the poorer income classes decrease in favour of the middle
income class, and to a lesser extant also the highest income class.
Population growth Area Income Category
2005 2025
Urban
Under Poverty Line
Under 1.5xPoverty Line
Middle Income
20% Highest Income
7.7 %
21.3 %
54.6 %
16.3 %
5 %
15 %
60 %
20 %
Rural
Under Poverty Line
Under 1.5X Poverty Line
Middle Income
20% Highest Income
22.3 %
33.3 %
29.7 %
14.7 %
10 %
15 %
50 %
25 %
42 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
- Commercial, : expected growth.
Based on the 2005 value added and the forecasted growth with GRDP and an
elastciyity, the commercial sector more than tripples in the 2005-2025 period.
Billion rupiah
2005 2025
Commercial 29.7 95.1
- Subsector composition
The shares of each subsector are kept constant over 2005 – 2025, this can be justified
by the rather constant shares over 2001 - 2005
Subsector growth (Million rupiah) No Subsector
2005 2025
1 Hotel 249,752 760,800
2 Restaurant 14,172,973 45,362,700
3 Trading 1,562,200 5,040,300
4 Financial Service 5,440,497 17,403,300
5 Amusement Service 503,613 1,616,700
6 Social Service 7,785,178 24,916,200
Total 29,714,213 95,100,000
- Industry : expected growth.
Industry grows less fast than the commercial sector, but also more or less tripples its
activity by 2025
Million rupiah
2005 2025
Industri 21,197,443 59,700,000
- Subsector composition.
Also here, no change in subsector share is assumed, so all grow proportional to the
overall industry sector.
43 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Subsector growth (Million rupiah) No Subsector
2005 2025
1 Food 12,968,530 36,524,275
2 Textile 123,523 347,887
3 Wood 1,246,759 3,511,344
4 Paper 165,086 464,944
5 Chemistry 4,021,194 11,325,200
6 Non Metal 917,097 2,582,891
7 Metal 1,162,385 3,273,715
8 Machinery 559,224 1,574,986
9 Others 33,644 94,754
Total 21,197,443 59,700,000
- Others: expected growth.
The other sector has the lowest growth of the economic sector, but stays above the
industry level.
Million rupiah
2005 2025
Others 28,782,038 63,200,000
- Subsector composition
The dominance by agriculture does not change over 2005 – 2025, so it keeps the
largest contribution to GRDP development.
Subsector growth (Million rupiah) No Subsector
2005 2025
1 Agriculture 22,191,305 48,727,976,7
2 Mining 1,074,751 2,359,953,2
3 Construction 5,515,982 12,112,070,1
Total 28,782,038 63,200,000
- Transportation: Elasticity tends to decrease.
Based on historic data, some very high elasticities with GRDP are determined for
some of the transport modes (see Tabel 5.1 and below). Straight extrapollation using
this same elasticities would lead to very high and unrealistic amounts of vehicles or
activity levels. In order to avoid e.g. that the ratio motorcycles per inhabitant
becomes too high, a relaxation of this elasticities has been introduced. The outcome
of this approach leads to more plausible, but still assumed, levels.
44 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Elasticity growth Item
2005 2025
Transportation
Car 1.19 1.0
Motorcycle 3.58 1.0
Truck 1,16 1.0
Aviation 5.65 1.0
- Further assumptions :
- Constant fuel intensities, no biofuels
Constant fuel intensities are used in the business as usual until 2025 and there
are no changies in the oil products’ consumption by bio fuel, even though a
biodiesel plant is already producing a certain amount (the biodiesel now just
used by a private company – oil palm company)
- No power plant addictions after 2010/2012.
The national government has an acceleration plan to build 10,000 MW to
overcome the national electricity problem and Sumatera Utara has a part of
about 2 x 200 MW in Pangkalan Susu of thise 10,000 MWe.
- Closure of refinery in 2006
Refinery in Pangkalan Brandan is closed in 2006, it means that the oil
products supply for Sumatera Utara comes from other regions (Jawa)
5.3 BAU RESULTS 5.3.1 Primary supply
The highest primary supply is Renewable (Biodiesel plant) about 673,78 million BOE,
(Sumatera Utara has an important role in the development of oil palm (15.7% or
1,023,350 ha) with its contribution in area equal to 15.7%, the contribution of crude
palm oil (CPO) is 21.3%. With private plantation amounting to 377,336.70 ha,
community plantation equal to 367,741.02 ha and 278,272.28 ha being the property of
PT. Perkebunan Nusantara. In producing biodiesel, PT. Pamina Adolina and their
capacity at beginning was 8 ton/day, and now already scales up to 12 ton/day and the
other company produce biodiesel 22 ton/day. Currently they use the biodiesel for their
own energy demand; those are for their palm oil mill machine and transportation), and
is followed by electricity (12,45 million BOE) and Natural gas (3,77 million BOE) at
2025 (Figure 5.1).
45 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Figure 5.1 Transformation Energy in SumUt 2025
- Electricity
Power plants are producing 4.656 thousand BOE electricity with production from
combined cycle power plants (PLTGU) (41.86 % -1.949 thousand BOE), followed by
Steam power plant (PLTU) (19.9% - 926 thousand BOE). The contribution of Diesel
power plant (PLTD) and Mini hydro (PLTA and PLTMH at remote areas; PLTMH Batang
Gadis I & II, PLTMH Tonduhan I & II, PLTMH Kombih I & II, PLTMH Aek Raisan I & II,
PLTMH Aek Silang, PLTMH Aek Sibundong ) to supply electricity is still small, the
quantities are 0,78% (36.5 thousand BOE) and 0.56% (26.2 thousand BOE) see Figure
5.2. PLTP is the geothermal plant and PLTU is a foreseen coal power plant.
Figure 5.2 Power Plant Final Energy in SumUt 2025
46 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
BO
E
shortage
domestic supply
demand
The increasing demand of electricity in 2025 is caused by industrial and commercial
sectors and as result the increasing at household demand of electricity; the total
demand of electricity is 7.312 thousand BOE. The high percentage of demand
electricity is Industrial (2.882 thousand BOE or 38.60%) and is followed by Household
(34,87%) and Commercial is 26.53% (Figure 5.3).
Figure 5.3 Electricity demand in SumUt 2025.
From the Figure 5.4, it can be seen that the amount of electricity produce by power
plant is just 4.656 thousand BOE in 2025 and meanwhile the demand of electricity by
consumer (household, commercial and industry) reach an amount 7.312 thousand BOE
in 2025. There is clearly a shortage in supply.
Figure 5.4 Electric Balance BAU SumUt
47 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
To fulfill the difference between demand and domestic supply (2.656 thousand BOE), it
is needed to construct new power plant. This is not easy for the governement
(national or regional) because such investment need money.
If the new power plant are not constructed , electric shortages for the years coming
will only increase and could reach substantial amount by 2025 (see Figure 5.4).
For new power plant, governement can invite the investors, but of course these
investors require guarantees by governement for their own invested money.
- Refinery.
The last production by refineries in Sumatera Utara occured in 2005, untill then the
production of the refinery consisted of the oil products Kerosene, Automotive Diesel
Oil, others and amounted to as much as 88,3 thousand BOE (Figure 5.5)
Figure 5.5 Production of Refinery in SumUt 2005
5.3.3 Final energy by fuel
The final energy consumption of 66.9 million BOE is dominated by oil products (81%)
which on its turn are dominated by Automotive Diesel Oil and Gasoline are 28.6 % and
30.1 %. Electricity takes about 11 % and Natural gas take about 5.1% (Figure 5.6 - 5.7).
48 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Figure 5.6 Final Energy by Fuel
Figure 5.7 Final Energy Consumption in SumUt 2025
Oil products are consumed mostly in the transport sector, but also industry and
households show a considerable use .The commercial and other sector consume each
about 4.8 and 3.2 million BOE respectively. Electricity is mainly used in industry,
followed by households and commercial. Natural gas is almost exclusively used in
industry, there is little use in households and commercial and wood is only used in
households as be showed in Figure 5.8.
49 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Electricity Oil Products Solid Fuels Natural Gas Biomass Renewables
mil
lio
n B
OE
Others
Transportation
Industry
Commercial
Households
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
thou
sand
BO
E Others
Transportation
Industry
Commercial
Households
Figure 5.8 Final Energy in SumUt 2025
5.3.2 Final energy by sector
Figure 5.9 Final Energy by Sector
50 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
5.3.2.1 Households urban/rural,
Final energy consumption in households is dominated by kerosene (50%), and both in
rural and urban areas. Electricity is equally used but to a lesser extent (20 - 34%)
(Figure 5.10). The major differences occur for the other fuels, in rural areas wood is the
second largest fuel whereas in urban areas LPG comes after electricity (Figure 5.11 –
5.12).
Figure 5.10 Final Energy Consumption Household in Sumut 2025
Figure 5.11 Urban Final Energy in SumUt 2025
51 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Figure 5.12 Rural Final Final Energy in SumUt 2025
Looking at the fuel consumption per income class, differences between similar classes in urban and rural area appear in both level and composition (Figure 5.13). So is wood used in all income classes in rural areas while LPG is obviously since it is more expensive - are used in the two highest urban income classes.
Figure 5.13 Urban and Rural (as Categories) Final Energy in Sumut 2025
52 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
5.3.2.2 COMMERCIAL
The final energy consumption for commercial sector is still dominated by oil product
(ADO, FO,LPG) for commercial is very important more than 70 % and second largest is
Electricity (28.71%) as shown at Figure 5.14. Using the Natural gas is still small and can
be extended, LPG is used most in restaurant (40.4%) (Figure 5.15).
Figure 5.14 Commercial Final Energy Consumption in SumUt 2025
Figure 5.15 Commercial Subsector Final Energy in SumUt 2025
53 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
54 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
5.3.3 INDUSTRY
Using the oil products (ADO, FO) for industry is very important, more than 66 %
compared with the other energy cariers (Figure 5.16). Natural gas and Electricity use
near 32 %. Machinery and Metal industry are using coal in small quantities, see Figure
5.17.
55 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Figure 5.16 Industrial Final Energy Consumption in SumUt 2025
Figure 5.17 Industrial Subsector Final Energy in SumUt 2025
56 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
57 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
58 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
5.3.4 Tansportation
Gasoline is the most utilised oil products with 60 % of the oil products and is followed
by Automotive Diesel Oil with 33.28 % (Figure 5.18 - 5.19), final energy consumption of
avtur is not so much, but could be signifigant in the future.
Figure 5.18 Transportation Final Oil Consumption in SumUt 2025
59 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
Figure 5.19 Transportation Subsector Final Energy in SumUt 2025
60 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
61 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
62 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote
5.3.5 OTHERS
Use of Automotive Diesel Oil (ADO) is highest (58,46 %) among oil products, Gasoline
and Kerosene increase not so much. FO for the others is just used for 4.55 % as shown
at Figure 5.20. Construction is a highest using ADO about 63 % and follow by Gasoline
is 28.2 % but use the Kerosene is to little (8.4 %) compare with the agriculture or
mining (Figure 5.21).
Figure 5.20 Others Final Oil Consumption in SumUt 2025
Figure 5.21 Others Subsector Final Energy in SumUt 2025
63 final draft ……………………………………. do not cite or quote