37
June 14th, 2006 Henk Taale Regional Traffic Management Method and Tool

Regional Traffic Management

  • Upload
    coty

  • View
    112

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Regional Traffic Management. Method and Tool. Contents. Dutch traffic and transport policy Traffic management Sustainable traffic management Regional Traffic Management Explorer Functionality Development Case studies Next steps Summary. Mobility in The Netherlands. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale

Regional Traffic Management

Method and Tool

Page 2: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 2

2006/10/2

Contents

• Dutch traffic and transport policy• Traffic management• Sustainable traffic management• Regional Traffic Management Explorer

– Functionality– Development– Case studies– Next steps

• Summary

Page 3: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 3

2006/10/3

Mobility in The Netherlands

• 16.2 million inhabitants• 3.1 trip per person per

day• 32 km per person per

day• 1 hour per person per

day• 6.9 million cars

• 16 million trips per car• 250 million car km per

day• 120 congestion locations• Average length 3.2 km• Average duration 65

minutes

Page 4: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 4

2006/10/4

Building: “very effective, expensive, long”

Pricing: “politically difficult”

Traffic Management: “effective, less expensive and quick”

Traffic and Transport Policy

Page 5: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 5

2006/10/5

Traffic Management Long Ago

Page 6: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 6

2006/10/6

Traffic Management 21st Century

Page 7: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 7

2006/10/7

Traffic Management Measures

Measure Number Kilometres

Planning 2005-2009

1 Motorway Traffic Management System

997 61

2 Speed Measures (80 km/hr zones) 5 40

3 Ramp Metering 44 16

4 Overtaking prohibition trucks 2441

5 Peak lanes (using hard shoulder) 95 463

6 Buslanes, trucklanes, tidal flow lanes 38 101 4/13

7 Measures for Road Works

8 Traffic Signal Control ±150

9 Other measures

10 Incident Management (camera’s) 53 99

11 Dynamic Route Information Panels (VMS)

119 22

12 Radio Traffic Information 865 547

Control InformIncident Management

Page 8: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 8

2006/10/8

Evaluation studies

Measure Measurements

Behaviour

Estimate

Number

Period

1 Motorway Traffic Management System

√ √ 8 1983-2000

2 Speed Measures (80 km/hr zones) √ 7 1983-2003

3 Ramp Metering √ 15 1990-2005

4 Overtaking prohibition trucks √ √ 8 1993-2003

5 Peak lanes (using hard shoulder) √ √ 6 1996-2003

6 Buslanes, trucklanes, tidal flow lanes √ √ 4 1991-1996

7 Measures for Road Works √ √ 3 2001-2004

8 Traffic Signal Control √ 9 1987-2004

9 Other measures √ √ 11 1992-2004

10 Incident Management (camera’s) √ √ √ 6 1995-2005

11 Dynamic Route Information Panels (VMS)

√ √ 15 1993-2005

12 Radio Traffic Information √ 9 2000-2005

13 Traffic Management Program √ √ 3 2001-2006

Control InformIncident Management

Page 9: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 9

2006/10/9

Overview important impacts

Measure Effect on traffic Effect capacity

1 Motorway Traffic Management System

Flow improvements 0%- 5% 0% to 5%

2 Speed Measures (80 km/hr zones) Congestion varies from -40% to +50% –9% to +4%

3 Ramp Metering 0% to +5%

4 Overtaking prohibition trucks Different per location –4% to +4%

5 Peak lanes (using hard shoulder) Decrease travel times from 1 to 3 minutesExtra traffic from 0% to +7%

+7% to +22%

6 Bus lanes, truck lanes, tidal flow lanes

Travel time busses/trucks –14 minutesTravel time other traffic from –5 to +2 minutes

7 Measures for Road Works Less demand, sometimes to –11%Less traffic on the section with road works: to –38%

8 Traffic Signal Control Change in travel times from –33% to +10%

9 Other measures Congestion from –28% to +45%

10 Incident Management (camera’s) Congestion –7% (Utrecht)

11 Dynamic Route Information Panels (VMS)

Congestion from –7% to –30%

12 Radio Traffic Information Route changes, more change if travellers are informed individually

Control InformIncident Management

Page 10: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 10

2006/10/10

Investment and Effects of ITS

Page 11: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 11

2006/10/11

Next Steps

• More investments and better ITS not the fundamental solution

• From technique to result oriented approach

Technical developmentFirst measures are explored

Application

Measures are applied at multiple locations

Result

Measures are coordinated throughout the network

Page 12: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 12

2006/10/12

Good Traffic Management is …

take decisionstake decisions

1 make a good start!

know what you want to achieveknow what you want to achieve

know what is happeningknow what is happening

come up with solutionscome up with solutions

4 formulate reference values

3 draw agreed collective policy on a map

2 know what you want to achieve together (prioritise)

6 spot conflicts

5 picture actual situation

8 formulate measures

7 formulate solution directions

9 take decisions

put decisions into practiceput decisions into practice

12 operational traffic management

11 prepare use of measures

10 implement measures

Page 13: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 13

2006/10/13

Nine Steps

Page 14: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 14

2006/10/14

Handbook Sustainable Traffic Management

Page 15: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 15

2006/10/15

Applications

• Some 40 projects in progress

• From ‘just started’ to ‘completed’

Page 16: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 16

2006/10/16

From a Traffic Control Strategy …

Page 17: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 17

2006/10/17

… to Operational Management

“Delay here = free

flow ahead”

Page 18: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 18

2006/10/18

Regional Traffic Management Explorer

• Sketch planning and modelling tool• Facilitate process of sustainable traffic

management (STM)• Quantify benefits of services and

measures• Simple and fast model for networks

(motorways, rural roads and urban streets)

• Compare different scenarios• National tool, independent of consultant

Page 19: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 19

2006/10/19

Structure RTME

OmniTRANS user

interface

RTME

plug-in

Dynamic Assignment

model(MARPLE)

Input network and OD matrix

from other model

Page 20: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 20

2006/10/20

Functionality RTME (1)

• Use of modelling input for control strategy and frame of reference

• Current situation, bottlenecks and effects of services and measures are simulated with a dynamic model

• All results are presented based on the indicators chosen in the frame of reference

• Results:– Travel time and delay per OD pair– Travel time and delay per route– Speed and flows per road section or route

Page 21: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 21

2006/10/21

Functionality RTME (2)

• Routes can be defined• Bottlenecks are presented with respect to

the actual situation or the frame of reference

• Effects of scenario can be compared with the actual situation, frame of reference or other scenario

• Applicable in regional and urban networks• Traffic signal control• Can be applied in workshops and back-

office

Page 22: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 22

2006/10/22

Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model

• Model for Assignment and Regional PoLicy Evaluation (MARPLE)

• Developed during PhD research on the interaction between traffic control and route choice behaviour

• Based on realistic travel time functions, also for controlled links, roundabouts and priority

• Route choice for predefined routes (deterministic and stochastic)

• Traffic flows through the network based on capacities of links and nodes (blocking-back)

Page 23: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 23

2006/10/23

Screenshot RTME

Page 24: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 24

2006/10/24

Case Studies for Testing

• Development RTME started in 2003• June 2004 first version ready for testing• 9 consultants: test RTME for 9 regions

– Model testing– Learning process for consultants– RTME input for 9 regions

• Version 1.0 ready end of October 2004

Page 25: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 25

2006/10/25

Regional Networks

Page 26: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 26

2006/10/26

Case Heerenveen-Skarsterlân

A6

A7

A7

A32

Page 27: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 27

2006/10/27

Policy Objectives

• Accessibility– Good external accessibility of the northern and western part

of The Netherlands using the A6 and A7 motorways– Guarantee accessibility of the region Heerenveen-

Skarsterlân from the western and northern part of The Netherlands

– Guarantee accessibility from towns to the main road network

– Improve the flow in the city centres Joure and Heerenveen– Maintain and improve current quality of public transport

services wherever it is possible

• Safety– Improvement of traffic safety on all types of roads– No through traffic through residential areas

• Liveability– Improvement of the use of public transport and bicycle

Page 28: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 28

2006/10/28

Control Strategy

Through traffic

Regional

traffic

Local traffic

Page 29: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 29

2006/10/29

Frame of Reference

• Priority 1 relations: delay should not exceed 20% of the free flow travel time

• Priority 2 relations: delay should not exceed 30% of the free flow travel time.

• Priority 3 relations: delay should not exceed 10 minutes or 40% of the free flow travel time (if the free flow travel time > 20 minutes).

• For priority 3 or lower roads: volume should not exceed 5000 veh/24 hrs and the speed should be at least 40% of the allowed speed.

Page 30: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 30

2006/10/30

Current Situation

Page 31: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 31

2006/10/31

Bottlenecks

UndefinedLowMiddleHigh

A6

A7

A7

A32

Page 32: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 32

2006/10/32

Beperken van instroom Bevorderen van in/uitstroom Herverdelen van capaciteit Maximaliseren capaciteit bottleneck

Services

Limit the inflow

Increase in/outflow

Redistribute capacity

Maximise capacity

bottleneck

Page 33: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 33

2006/10/33

Measures

Snelheidsdeken (regionaal) Spitsstrook Aanpassen VRI’s bij aansluiting

Speed regime (regional)

Peak hour lane

Adjustment traffic signal control

Page 34: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 34

2006/10/34

Effects

Page 35: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 35

2006/10/35

Next Steps

• More regions initiate the STM process and using the RTME

• Also used for planning projects for Rijkswaterstaat: one corporate tool

• Extension with indicators for safety and environmental issues

• Extension for road works• Model adjustments

– Automatic calibration– Freight transport

Page 36: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 36

2006/10/36

Summary

• Traffic management is essential part of Dutch traffic and transport policy

• Shift from technique to result oriented• Handbook ‘Sustainable Traffic

Management’ structures process to come to operational traffic management

• Regional Traffic Management Explorer is an essential tool to support this process

Page 37: Regional Traffic Management

June 14th, 2006

Henk Taale 37

2006/10/37

Colophon

Henk TaaleRijkswaterstaatAVV Transport Research CentreE-mail: [email protected]

Pictures: Rijkswaterstaat