156
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION

COMMISSION

Reno, Sparks and

Washoe County, Nevada

COMPREHENSIVE

ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED

JUNE 30, 2013

Page 2: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION

COMMISSION

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL

REPORT

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013

Finance Department

Thomas R. Taelour, CFO

Page 3: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

ii

CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTORY SECTION

Chief Financial Officer’s Letter of Transmittal .............................................................................. vii

Principal Officials of the Regional Transportation Commission ................................................... xiv

Organization Chart ....................................................................................................................... xv

Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ............................................... xvi

FINANCIAL SECTION

Independent Auditor’s Report ...................................................................................................... 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis ...................................................................................... 5

Basic Financial Statements:

Government–wide Financial Statements:

Statement of Net Position ............................................................................................. 19

Statement of Activities .................................................................................................. 20

Fund Financial Statements:

Governmental Funds:

Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds ................................................................. 22

Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position – Governmental Funds .......................................................................................... 24

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Governmental Funds .......................................................................................... 25

Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances to the Statement of Activities – Governmental Funds .............. 26

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual – General Fund .................................................................... 28

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual – Special Revenue Fund (Regional Road Impact Fee Fund) 29

Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual – Special Revenue Fund (Paratransit Services Fund) ........... 30

Proprietary Fund:

Statement of Fund Net Position – Proprietary Fund – Enterprise Fund (Public Transit Fund) .............................................................................................. 31

Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position – Proprietary Fund – Enterprise Fund (Public Transit Fund) .................................... 32

Page 4: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

iii

CONTENTS – Continued

Page

FINANCIAL SECTION – Continued

Basic Financial Statements – Continued:

Proprietary Fund:

Statement of Cash Flows – Proprietary Fund – Enterprise Fund (Public Transit Fund) ..................................................................................................... 33

Notes to Financial Statements ............................................................................................. 35

Required Supplementary Information:

Schedule of Funding Progress – Other Postemployment Benefits ....................................... 63

Individual Fund Statements and Schedules:

Nonmajor Governmental Fund:

Balance Sheet – Nonmajor Governmental Funds (Metropolitan Planning Organization Fund) ........................................................................................................ 66

Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual:

Special Revenue Fund (Metropolitan Planning Organization Fund) ..................... 67

Capital Assets Used in the Operation of Governmental Funds:

Schedule by Sources .................................................................................................... 69

Schedule by Function and Activity ................................................................................ 70

Schedule of Changes by Function and Activity ............................................................ 71

Other Supplementary Information:

Schedule of Current Expenditures –Budget and Actual – General Fund (Regional Street and Highway Fund) ........................................................................... 73

Schedule of Current Expenditures – Budget and Actual – Debt Service Fund (Debt Service Fund) ...................................................................................................... 74

Schedule of Current Expenditures –Budget and Actual – Special Revenue Fund (Regional Road Impact Fee Fund) ............................................................................... 75

Schedule of Current Expenditures – Budget and Actual – Special Revenue Fund (Paratransit Services Fund) ......................................................................................... 76

Schedule of Current Expenditures – Budget and Actual – Special Revenue Fund (Metropolitan Planning Organization Fund) .................................................................. 77

Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - Debt Service Fund ....................................................................... 78

Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position – Budget and Actual – Proprietary Fund (Public Transit Fund) ........................................................................ 79

Schedule of Expenses by Object Classes – Budget and Actual – Proprietary Fund (Public Transit Fund) .................................................................................................... 80

Schedule of Special and Regular Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Collections by Month ......... 81

Schedule of Construction Project Expenditures – General Fund (Regional Street and Highway Fund) ............................................................................................ 83

Page 5: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

iv

CONTENTS - Continued

Page

FINANCIAL SECTION – Continued

Other Supplementary Information – Continued

Schedule of Construction Project Expenditures – Special Revenue Fund (Regional Road Impact Fee Fund) ............................................................................... 84

Schedule of Changes in Reserve for Project Appropriations – General Fund (Regional Street and Highway Fund) ........................................................................... 85

Schedule of Changes in Reserve for Project Appropriations – Special Revenue Fund (Regional Road Impact Fee Fund) ...................................................................... 93

Schedule of Cumulative Construction Project Expenditures – General Fund (Regional Street and Highway Fund) ........................................................................... 99

Schedule of Cumulative Construction Project Expenditures – Special Revenue Fund (Regional Road Impact Fee Fund) ...................................................................... 107

STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited)

Net Position by Component – Last ten fiscal years ..................................................................... 110

Changes in Net Position – Last ten fiscal years ........................................................................... 111

Fund Balances of Governmental Funds – Last ten fiscal years ................................................... 113

Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds – Last ten fiscal years ............................... 114

Revenues by Source, Governmental Funds – Last ten fiscal years ............................................ 115

Revenues by Source, Proprietary Funds – Last ten fiscal years ................................................. 116

Principal Regional Road Impact Fee Credit Recipients – As of June 30, 2010 ............................ 117

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Units .............................................................................................. 118

Direct and Overlapping Tax Rates – Last ten fiscal years ............................................................ 119

Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type – Last ten fiscal years ........................................................ 120

Computation of General Obligation Direct and Overlapping Debt ............................................... 121

Pledged Revenue Bond Coverage and Limitations – Last ten fiscal years ................................. 122

Demographic and Economic Statistics – Last ten fiscal years ..................................................... 123

Principal Employers – Current year and nine years ago .............................................................. 124

Full Time Equivalent Government Employees by Department – Last ten fiscal years ................ 125

RIDE Operating Statistics – Last ten fiscal years ........................................................................ 126

ACCESS Operating Statistics – Last ten fiscal years .................................................................. 127

Capital Asset Information ............................................................................................................. 128

Page 6: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

v

CONTENTS – Continued

Page

COMPLIANCE SECTION

Auditors’ Comments:

Statute Compliance ............................................................................................................... 130 Progress on Prior Year Statute Compliance ......................................................................... 130 Current Year Recommendations ........................................................................................... 130 Prior Year Recommendations ............................................................................................... 130

Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ....................................................................... 131

Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for each Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance Required by OMB Circular A-133 ..................................................................... 133

Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards .............................................................................. 135

Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ............................................................... 137

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs ............................................................................... 138

Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings ................................................................................. 139

Page 7: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

INTRODUCTORY SECTION

Page 8: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

vii

RTC Board: Bonnie Weber (Chair) Dwight Dortch (Vice Chair) Sharon Zadra David Humke Ron Smith

PO Box 30002, Reno, NV 89520 2050 Villanova Drive, Reno, NV 89502 775-348-0400 rtcwashoe.com

December 20, 2013

Honorable Chair and Members

Regional Transportation Commission

2050 Villanova Drive

Reno, Nevada 89502

To the Honorable Chairman, Members of the Commission, and Citizens of Reno, Sparks and

Washoe County:

State law requires that all general-purpose local governments publish within six months of the

close of each fiscal year a complete set of financial statements presented in conformity with

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and audited in accordance with generally

accepted auditing standards by a firm of licensed Certified Public Accountants. Pursuant to that

requirement, we hereby issue the comprehensive annual financial report of the Regional

Transportation Commission (RTC) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

This report consists of management’s representations concerning the finances of the RTC.

Consequently, management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all

of the information presented in this report. To provide a reasonable basis for making these

representations, management of the RTC has established a comprehensive internal control

framework that is designed both to protect the government’s assets from loss, theft, or misuse and

to compile sufficient reliable information for the preparation of the RTC’s financial statements in

conformity with GAAP. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits,

the RTC’s comprehensive framework of internal controls has been designed to provide

reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements will be free from material

misstatement. As management, we assert that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, this

financial report is complete and reliable in all material respects.

The RTC’s financial statements have been audited by Kafoury, Armstrong & Co., a firm of

licensed Certified Public Accountants. The goal of the independent audit is to provide reasonable

assurance that the financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are free of material

misstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting

the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used

and significant estimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement

presentation. The independent auditor concluded, based upon the audit, that there was a

reasonable basis for rendering an unmodified opinion that the RTC’s financial statements for the

Page 9: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Honorable Chairman and Members

Regional Transportation Commission

December 20, 2013

viii

fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The independent

auditor’s opinion is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report. The

independent audit of the financial statements of the RTC was part of a broader, federally-

mandated “Single Audit” designed to meet the special needs of federal grantor agencies. The

standards governing Single Audit engagements require the independent auditor to report not only

on the fair presentation of the financial statements, but also on the audited government’s internal

controls and compliance with legal requirements, with special emphasis on internal controls and

legal requirements involving the administration of federal awards.

GAAP require that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to

accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management’s Discussion and Analysis

(MD&A). This letter of transmittal is designed to complement MD&A and should be read in

conjunction with it. The RTC’s MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the

independent auditors.

Profile of the Government

The RTC is located in Northern Nevada. It serves the cities of Reno and Sparks and the county of

Washoe. The RTC’s service area is 96 square miles and serves a population of 434,120.

Two major sources of revenue for the RTC are fuel tax and sales tax (public transportation tax).

Fuel tax and sales tax can be designated for the RTC transportation purposes by the Legislature

and must be implemented by Washoe County ordinance. By statute, the RTC may exercise the

power of eminent domain with the approval of the City or County in which the property lies.

The RTC has operated as a special purpose unit of government since 1979, as a result of

legislation approved in the 1979 Nevada State Legislature.

Overall agency guidance is provided by the Commission, which is composed of locally elected

officials. Members of the Commission are appointed by their respective political jurisdiction and

include two (2) members representing Washoe County, two (2) members representing the largest

city in the jurisdiction (City of Reno), and one (1) member representing the other city in the

jurisdiction (City of Sparks). They serve staggered two-year terms.

The Commission establishes and approves policy direction for the agency in all program areas.

Policy established by the Commission is implemented through a professional/technical staff

supervised by an Executive Director.

The Executive Director serves at the pleasure of the Commission and is considered to be an

unclassified employee. The Commission establishes compensation for the Executive Director

position. Department Directors and certain administrator personnel are also unclassified

employees of the RTC and are subject to a classification and compensation plan approved by the

Commission. Remaining staff are classified employees of the RTC and are also subject to a

classification and compensation plan approved by the Commission.

Separate contracts have been established for the public transportation elements of the RTC, which

include RTC RIDE, the bus system; RTC ACCESS, the paratransit service; RTC INTERCITY, a

commuter service between Reno/Sparks and Carson City; and TART (Tahoe Area Rapid Transit),

the transportation service for North Lake Tahoe. RTC has a turnkey contract with MV

Transportation, Inc. for the transit service. RTC continues to receive all revenues and purchases

Page 10: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Honorable Chairman and Members

Regional Transportation Commission

December 20, 2013

ix

and maintains ownership of all assets of the transit operation. MV provides for the operation of

RTC RIDE and RTC INTERCITY service from Reno to Carson City. The service is funded by

the RTC and the city of Carson City.

The RTC also has a turnkey contract with First Transit Inc. for the operation of the RTC

ACCESS, the paratransit service for the disabled. General service policies are established by the

RTC with implementation through the RTC staff and First Transit Inc.

The RTC contracts for transportation service at the North Shore of Lake Tahoe, for the Tahoe

Area Rapid Transit (TART) system. The service is provided by Placer County, California,

through a contractual agreement, and Placer County is reimbursed by the RTC for the transit

service provided in the Washoe County jurisdiction.

The RTC is responsible for three major transportation programs:

Regional Street and Highway Program – The primary responsibility of the RTC in the Regional

Street and Highway program is to approve and implement road projects through a priority-setting

process in both the technical and political levels.

Public Transportation Program – The RTC may establish and operate public transportation, both

fixed route and paratransit, in conformance with Nevada Revised Statutes. The RTC has the

responsibility and the authority to appropriate money from the Public Transit Fund for such

purposes and may provide for all functions incident to the administration and operation of public

transportation, which includes RTC RIDE (including RTC RAPID/CONNECT), RTC ACCESS,

RTC Sierra Spirit, RTC INTERCITY, and TART.

RTC Sierra Spirit, a bus service for residents and visitors to the area, continues to operate as the

downtown Reno circulator. RTC Sierra Spirit moves people around the Reno downtown core as

far north as the University of Nevada, Reno, with numerous stops in between.

Transportation Planning – The RTC is designated as the Metropolitan Planning Organization

(MPO) for Washoe County. In that capacity, the RTC is responsible for establishing policy

direction for transportation planning. This responsibility includes the approval of the Regional

Transportation Plan (RTP), the annual Five-Year Financial Plan, Transportation Improvement

Program (TIP), Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), and the establishment and approval of

federal funding priorities in certain program areas. The RTC provides major project review of the

transportation impacts of new projects and developments.

The RTC’s Budget Process

The annual budget serves as the foundation for the RTC’s financial planning and control. All

Department Directors of the RTC are required to submit their budgets for approval by the

Executive Director in March of each year. The RTC uses zero-based budgeting. Each

department’s budget is presented in extensive line item detail. A budget workshop is held for the

Commissioners in February. A draft budget is presented to the Commission in April. Any

Commissioners’ changes are included in the final document, and that document is presented for a

public hearing and approval in May. The appropriated budget is prepared by fund, function (e.g.,

Street and Highway), and department (e.g., Finance). Department Directors may make transfers

of appropriations within a department. Transfers of appropriations between departments require

the approval of the Executive Director. Any increase in Fund Budgets requires the approval of

Page 11: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Honorable Chairman and Members

Regional Transportation Commission

December 20, 2013

x

the Commission. Budget-to-actual comparisons are provided in this report for each individual

governmental fund for which an appropriated annual budget has been adopted. For the major

governmental funds, the General Fund, the Regional Road Impact Fee Fund, and the Paratransit

Services Fund, these comparisons are presented as part of the basic financial statements. For the

nonmajor governmental fund, with appropriated annual budgets, these comparisons are presented

in the Nonmajor Governmental Fund subsection of this report, following the basic financial

statements. For the Public Transit Fund, the comparison is presented as part of the other

supplementary information.

Agency Accomplishments – FY 2013

Completed the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)

Completed three corridor studies

Completed the TMRPA shared services agreement

Substantially completed the Travel demand model upgrades

Completed Moana Lane construction and widening

Completed Southeast McCarran – Phase I

Completed Vista Sound walls

Placed the Pyramid/McCarran Environmental Impact Statement into public review

Implemented early right of way acquisition for Pyramid/McCarran intersection

Continued process on the Pyramid/US-395 (Sun Valley Connector)

Began construction of the SouthEast Connector Phase I

Completed Phase II CMAR procurement preconstruction services selection

Provided funding to NDOT for four projects

Increased RIDE ridership and achieved the best on-time performance record since 2009

Implemented 141 Community Outreach events for the RTC programs and services

Completed fourth bond sale for $165 million par

Completed Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)

Received unqualified opinion – Certified Audit

Completed common review of RTC employees – first year

Received GFOA Certificate of Achievement

Completed Triennial FTA Review with no findings

Completed the first project for Process Improvement – Procurement

Page 12: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Honorable Chairman and Members

Regional Transportation Commission

December 20, 2013

xi

Factors Affecting Financial Condition

Local economy – While the state as a whole is beginning to see moderate economic improvement,

Washoe County is still seeing a challenged economy. This is due primarily to the down

construction and housing markets. The area’s economy is principally based in the trade and

service sector. Although gaming and other recreational activities represent a significant portion

of the growing economy, this area is experiencing diversification of its business base with the

expansion of distribution, warehousing, and manufacturing facilities. Approximately 38% of the

workforce is employed in the fields of construction, manufacturing, trade, transportation,

information, utilities, and finance-related services. During the last year, Washoe County had no

change in job growth. The unemployment rate as of June 2013 was 9.8%.

Statewide gaming revenues were down 4.8% for FY 2013. Washoe County casinos’ gaming

revenues increased by approximately 2.4% in FY 2013. The number of permits issued for new

homes in Washoe County is flat. The housing market continues to be challenged.

Washoe County sales tax revenue for FY 2013 was 5.9% higher than the prior year. Fuel tax

revenues continue to increase year-over-year; the increase for FY 2013 was 18.4% due to the

RTC-5 indexing that was implemented in January 2010. The gallons of gasoline used in Washoe

County in FY 2013, however, were actually lower than FY 2012 by 1.0%.

Nevada has no personal income tax, and it is a right-to-work state. The State has no estate and/or

gift taxes, no unitary taxes, no franchise taxes, and no inventory taxes. These factors had

contributed to the State’s tremendous growth over the last 20 years prior to the latest decline in

the economy.

Long-term financial planning – As the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for ground

transportation in the Truckee Meadows, the RTC uses a cooperative strategy inclusive of all local

and state governments. The RTC coordinates, plans, and executes Washoe County’s

transportation projects to serve the present and the future.

As the MPO, the RTC:

designs and implements the short and long-range regional transportation plans for

Washoe County;

acquires federal, state, and local funding for major regional transportation projects;

coordinates with local jurisdictions to identify traffic impacts from current and proposed

residential and commercial development;

defines measures to relieve congestion;

creates traffic projections to anticipate and respond to future regional growth; and

recommends, implements, and monitors new technologies for transit programs.

The foundation of the RTC planning program is a 30-year Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).

The current RTP 2035 plan was affirmed in June 2013. The plan had substantial citizen

involvement. The RTP serves as the region’s long-range transportation plan to accommodate the

master-planned development in the City of Reno, City of Sparks, and Washoe County. The plan

addresses all modes of travel including automobiles, transit, bicycles, pedestrians, aviation, rail

and goods movement as well as transportation management strategies to make the system more

efficient.

Page 13: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Honorable Chairman and Members

Regional Transportation Commission

December 20, 2013

xii

Short Term Planning

The Short-Range Transit Program (SRTP) for the fiscal years 2012-2016 was adopted by the

RTC in December 2011. The SRTP serves as the implementation plan for public transit with

annual updates over the next five years. The SRTP is driven by the goals and policies of the

RTP. The SRTP is a capital-intensive plan. Approximately $38 million in expenditures have

been programmed over 5 years. Continued changes in the economy and the financial forecast

may affect how some projects move forward. RIDE and ACCESS service levels are projected

and implemented from this plan.

Debt Management

The Road Program received a substantial revenue boost when NV Senate Bill 201 (indexing of

local, State and Federal fuel taxes) was approved by the Legislature in June 2009. Collections

began in January 2010. In an effort to stimulate the local economy, the Commission deviated

from their usual “pay as you go” philosophy and has initiated four bond sales totaling $434

million. The first bond sale was completed in July 2009, the second in March 2010, the third in

December 2010, and the fourth bond sale was completed in April 2013. Upon the completion of

the SouthEast Connector the Commission will move back to the pay as you go method. Key

future projects in the road program between now and the next 10 years include: McCarran

Boulevard widening from Mira Loma to Greg; Geiger Grade realignment; the completion of the

SE Connector project; and the construction of the US395 and Pyramid Connector.

Operational Model

RTC uses privatization for implementation of the majority of its programs. RTC contracts out

with engineering and construction firms for implementation of the road programs. Corridor

studies are prepared by engineering and consulting firms. RTC contracts out the operation of

RIDE and ACCESS through “turnkey” contracts which are common in the transportation

industry. The RTC maintains a staff of 67 employees to oversee the RTC programs.

Awards and Recognition

The RTC staff, projects, and services were recognized on various occasions in FY 2013 for their

commitment to quality and meeting the needs of the community:

Received an award from the Green Building Council for the BRT stations.

Received an award from the ASCE Truckee Meadows Branch Outstanding Achievement

in Civil Engineering, Geotechnical, for Phase I of the SouthEast Connector.

Received a National Asphalt Pavement Association’s Quality in Construction award for

Southeast McCarran Phase I.

Page 14: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The
Page 15: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

xiv

PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

TERM OF TERM

OFFICE NAME OFFICE EXPIRES

Board Members

Chairman Bonnie Weber 2 years December 31, 2014

Vice-Chairman Dwight Dortch 2 years December 31, 2014

Board Member Sharon Zadra 2 years December 31, 2013

Board Member David Humke 2 years December 31, 2013

Board Member Ron Smith 2 years December 31, 2014

RTC Staff

Executive Director * Lee G. Gibson, AICP Appointed

Administrative Services Director Steve J. Burlie Appointed

Chief Financial Officer Thomas R. Taelour, CPA Appointed

Engineering Director Jeffrey D. Hale, PE Appointed

Planning Director Amy M. Cummings, AICP Appointed

Public Transportation Director David F. Jickling Appointed

Legal Counsel Dale Ferguson, Esq. Appointed

Contract

Public Transit Manager Donald Penny, MV Transportation Contracted

Paratransit Manager Hollie Young, First Transit Contracted

Independent Auditor Kafoury, Armstrong & Co. Contracted

* The Executive Director is appointed by the Regional Transportation Commission. All other staff

members are appointed by the Executive Director.

Page 16: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

The Citizens of Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

RTC Board Commissioners (5)

Executive Director (1)

Operations Director (1)

Engineering Director (1)

Chief Financial Officer (1)

Administrative Services Director (1)

Planning Director (1)

Executive Office Administrator (1)

Trip Reduction

Specialist (1)

Sr. Transit Planner (2)

Office Associate (1)

Office Administrator

(1)

Asst. Transit Planner (1)

Vacant Fleet & Facilities

Manager (1)

Passenger Services Lead

(1)

Passenger Services

Associate (3 & 1 PT)

Facilities Maint.

Supervisor (1)

Paratransit Admin

Associate (1)

Paratransit Specialist

(1)

Maint. Specialist

(2)

Maint. Technician II

(1)

Office Administrator

(1)

Senior Engineer

(1)

Engineer II (6)

Senior Engineer

(1)

Engineer II (2)

Engineer I (1)

Admin Associates

(3)

Property Agent (1)

Legal Admin (1)

Sr. Financial Analyst (1)

Financial Administrator

(1)

Sr. Financial Analyst (2)

Accounting Specialist (2)

Procurement Compliance

Administrator (1)

Procurement Compliance Analyst (2)

Payroll Benefits Technician (1)

Human Resources

Administrator (2 PT)

Vacant IT Administrator

(1)

Security & Safety

Administrator (1)

Vacant Security & Safety

Specialist (1 PT)

Graphic Designer (1)

Admin

Associate (1)

Public Information Officer (1)

Vacant Planning Manager (1)

Vacant Sr. Technical

Planner (1)

Planner (4)

Regional Transportation Commission of Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, NevadaFiscal Year 2013 Organization Chart - July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013

xv

Information Systems

Analyst (3)

Sr. Technical Planner (1)

Page 17: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The
Page 18: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

FINANCIAL SECTION

Page 19: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Independent Auditor’s Report To the Commissioners of the Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Regional Transportation Commission, Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada (RTC), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2013, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the RTC’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

2

Page 20: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of RTC, as of June 30, 2013, and the respective changes in financial position, and where applicable, cash flows thereof and the respective budgetary comparisons for the General Fund, Regional Road Impact Fee Fund and Paratransit Services Fund, for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Emphasis of Matter As described in Note C to the financial statements, in 2013, RTC adopted new accounting guidance, GASB Statement No. 65, Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis and the schedule of funding progress on pages 5-17 and page 63, respectively, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise RTC’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, individual fund statements and schedules, other supplementary information and statistical section are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements.

The individual fund statements and schedules, the other supplementary information, statistical section and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in

3

Page 21: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the individual fund statements and schedules, the other supplementary information and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.

Prior Year Partial Comparative Information We have previously audited RTC’s 2012 financial statements (not presented herein), and we expressed unmodified audit opinions on the respective financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information in our reported dated November 28, 2012. In our opinion, the summarized comparative information presented in the basic financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2012, is consistent, in all material respects, with the audited financial statements from which it has been derived. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated November 26, 2013, on our consideration of RTC’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering RTC’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Reno, Nevada November 26, 2013

4

Page 22: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

June 30, 2013

As management of the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC), we are presenting this narrative overview and analysis of the functional activities of the RTC for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. Readers are encouraged to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information furnished in the letter of transmittal, which can be found in the introductory section of this report.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The RTC’s cash and investments exceeded its liabilities due within one year by $243.9 million at the close of the most recent fiscal year. The RTC’s cash ratio is 7.7, meaning the RTC has more than 7.0 times the cash and investments available to meet current obligations. Last year’s ratio was 6.0. The increase is due to higher restricted cash balances from sale of revenue bonds.

The RTC’s total net position decreased by $46.0 million. Net position of the governmental activities decreased by $45.6 million due to revenue bond financing of infrastructure assets that are not included in RTC’s capital assets (Note Q). Net position of the business-type activities decreased by $0.4 million due to a decrease in federal funding receivables.

At of the end of the current fiscal year, the RTC’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $261.1 million, an increase of $129.1 million in comparison with the prior year. Most of the increase is due to higher restricted cash balances from the sale of revenue bonds.

At the end of the current fiscal year, the fund balance of the general fund is $215.9 million. Of this balance, $182,068 is nonspendable for prepaid expenses and deposits; $215.7 million is restricted for road construction projects. The unassigned fund balance of the general fund is zero.

RTC’s outstanding bond debt increased from $264.1 million to $423.3 million, as a result of $165.0 million in revenue bonds sales offset by principal payments of $5.8 million.

The RTC’s total revenue increased 18.5% or $15.5 million in comparison with the prior year. The increase is due to increases in fuel taxes, sales taxes, and federal funding for capital and operating expenses. The RTC’s primary revenue sources are Motor Vehicle Fuel tax and Public Transportation (Sales) tax. These two revenue sources comprise 42.1% and 21.5% of the RTC’s revenues, respectively. Motor Vehicle Fuel tax revenue increased $6.5 million or 18.4% due to the passage of State legislation that authorized additional taxes on motor vehicle fuel and special fuel and provided for annual increases based on the Producer Price Index (PPI). Increases have been in effect since January 1, 2010. Public Transportation tax increased $1.2 million or 5.9% due to increases in retail taxable sales.

Total expenses were $145.4 million, an increase of 4.9% over the prior year. Governmental activities made up 79.3% of the total expenses, an increase of 0.8% due to increased expenditures for road construction projects financed by the proceeds from revenue bonds. Business-type activities made up 20.7% of the total expenses, a decrease of .8% due to minor decreases in operating expenses for public transportation services resulting from reductions in turnkey contract labor and services.

OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the RTC’s basic financial statements. The RTC’s basic financial statements are comprised of three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. Government-wide Financial Statements

The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the RTC’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business.

The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the RTC’s assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows/outflows of resources, with the difference reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the RTC is improving or deteriorating. The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the RTC’s net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave).

5

Page 23: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Government-wide Financial Statements (continued)

Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the RTC that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business-type activities). The governmental activities of the RTC include general government activities, streets and highways projects, transportation services, and metropolitan planning. The business-type activity of the RTC includes public transportation. The government-wide financial statements can be found on pages 19-21 of this report. Fund Financial Statements

A fund is a grouping of related accounts that are used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The RTC, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. All of the funds of the RTC can be divided into two categories: governmental funds and a proprietary fund.

Governmental Funds

Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financing requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the RTC’s near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The RTC maintains five individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the General Fund, Debt Service Fund, the Regional Road Impact Fee Fund, and the Paratransit Services Fund, all of which are considered to be major funds and for the Metropolitan Planning Organization Fund which is considered to be a nonmajor fund. Additional data for all of the governmental funds is provided in the supplementary information section of this report. The RTC adopts an annual appropriated budget for all funds. Budgetary comparison statements have been provided for the governmental funds to demonstrate compliance with these budgets. The RTC did not amend its budget in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

Proprietary Fund

The RTC maintains one proprietary fund. This proprietary fund, an enterprise fund, is used to report the same functions presented as business-type activities in the government-wide financial statements. The RTC uses this fund to account for public transportation. Notes to the Financial Statements

The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the financial statements can be found on pages 35-61 of this report.

6

Page 24: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Other Information

Required supplementary information concerning the RTC’s progress in funding its obligation to provide pension benefits to its employees can be found on page 63. Supplementary information, including individual fund statements and schedules providing budget to actual comparisons and schedules of capital assets used in the operations of governmental funds, are presented after the basic financial statements. The Statistical Section provides detailed multi-year information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the RTC’s overall financial health. Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the prior year statement presentations have been reclassified for comparison purposes to conform with current year presentation. GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Net Position

As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of the RTC’s financial position. In the case of the RTC, total liabilities exceeded total assets by $78,917,811 at the close of the current fiscal year. RTC’s negative net position results from revenue bond financing of infrastructure assets that are not included in RTC’s capital assets (Note Q). A significant portion of RTC’s net position represents resources that are subject to external restrictions (e.g. statutes, bond covenants, and grants) on how they may be used. Restricted net position increased $128,415,316 from the prior year due to increases in restricted cash from the sale of revenue bonds. Unrestricted net position may be used to meet the government’s ongoing obligations to its citizens and creditors. RTC’s negative unrestricted net position increased $178,849,021 from the prior year due to increased debt from the sale of revenue bonds.

2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012

Assets:

Current and other assets $ 284,132,950 $ 149,938,592 $ 18,376,295 $ 20,730,603 $ 302,509,245 $ 170,669,195

Capital assets 5,882,121 5,919,201 79,595,208 78,095,603 85,477,329 84,014,804

Total assets 290,015,071 155,857,793 97,971,503 98,826,206 387,986,574 254,683,999

Liabilities:

Noncurrent liabilities 436,873,442 266,528,493 558,811 447,197 437,432,253 266,975,690

Other liabilities 27,471,484 15,074,191 2,000,648 2,580,749 29,472,132 17,654,940

Total liabilities 464,344,926 281,602,684 2,559,459 3,027,946 466,904,385 284,630,630

Net position:

Net investment in capital

assets 5,882,121 5,919,201 79,595,208 78,095,603 85,477,329 84,014,804

Restricted 259,684,409 131,269,093 - - 259,684,409 131,269,093

Unrestricted (439,896,385) (262,933,185) 15,816,836 17,702,657 (424,079,549) (245,230,528)

Total net position $ (174,329,855) $ (125,744,891) $ 95,412,044 $ 95,798,260 $ (78,917,811) $ (29,946,631)

Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total

RTC's NET POSITION

7

Page 25: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Net Position (continued)

Another significant portion of RTC’s total net position is its investment in capital assets, (e.g. land, buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any related outstanding debt used to acquire those assets. RTC’s investment in capital assets increased by $1,462,525 over the prior year mostly due to building improvements. The RTC did not use debt to acquire capital assets in this fiscal year. The RTC uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. If the RTC uses debt to purchase capital assets in future fiscal years, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay any long-term obligations must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these types of liabilities.

2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012

Revenues:

Program revenues

Charges for services 1,406,404$ 1,878,058$ 6,696,026$ 6,698,605$ 8,102,430$ 8,576,663$

Operating grants and

contributions 8,144,396 2,848,140 3,989,322 3,482,964 12,133,718 6,331,104

Capital grants and

contributions 1,563,320 6,791,872 5,462,720 4,579,825 7,026,040 11,371,697

Total program revenues 11,114,120 11,518,070 16,148,068 14,761,394 27,262,188 26,279,464

General revenues:

Motor vehicle fuel taxes 41,827,886 35,318,650 - - 41,827,886 35,318,650

Public transportation taxes 8,459,319 7,726,463 12,926,595 12,472,313 21,385,914 20,198,776

Regional road impact fees 8,597,569 595,963 - - 8,597,569 595,963

Investment earnings 207,242 1,084,637 35,051 320,859 242,293 1,405,496

Gain on sale of assets 10,498 598 38,349 2,930 48,847 3,528

Other miscellaneous 2,933 55,085 14,550 29,669 17,483 84,754

Total general revenues 59,105,447 44,781,396 13,014,545 12,825,771 72,119,992 57,607,167

Total revenues 70,219,567 56,299,466 29,162,613 27,587,165 99,382,180 83,886,631

Expenses:

Streets and highw ays 91,015,767 85,850,887 - - 91,015,767 85,850,887

Transportation services 7,387,322 6,893,683 - - 7,387,322 6,893,683

Metropolitan planning 2,802,772 3,451,822 - - 2,802,772 3,451,822

Public transportation - - 30,109,937 29,761,495 30,109,937 29,761,495

Debt service 14,065,904 12,584,166 - - 14,065,904 12,584,166

Total expenses 115,271,765 108,780,558 30,109,937 29,761,495 145,381,702 138,542,053

Change in net position

before transfers (45,052,198) (52,481,092) (947,324) (2,174,330) (45,999,522) (54,655,422)

Transfers (561,108) 337,500 561,108 (337,500) - -

Change in net position (45,613,306) (52,143,592) (386,216) (2,511,830) (45,999,522) (54,655,422)

Net postion - July 1 as

originally reported (125,744,891) (73,951,299) 95,798,260 98,310,090 (29,946,631) 24,358,791

Prior period adjustment (2,971,658) 350,000 - - (2,971,658) 350,000

Net position - July 1 as adjusted (128,716,549) (73,601,299) 95,798,260 98,310,090 (32,918,289) 24,708,791

Net position - June 30 (174,329,855)$ (125,744,891)$ 95,412,044$ 95,798,260$ (78,917,811)$ (29,946,631)$

RTC's CHANGES IN NET POSITION

Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total

8

Page 26: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Change in Net Position

The RTC’s total net position decreased $45,999,522 during the current year primarily due to revenue bond financing of infrastructure assets that are not included in RTC’s capital assets (Note Q). Program revenues are directly related to service activities of a function and include charges for services which decreased 5.5% due to decreases in project reimbursements, operating grants and contributions which increased 91.7% mostly due to a major cost sharing contribution from the State of Nevada for road construction projects; and capital grants and contributions which decreased 38.2% due to reductions in capital purchases. General revenues increased $14,512,825 or 25.2% from the prior year mostly due an 18.4% in motor vehicle fuel tax, and 5.9% in public transportation (sales) tax. General revenues represent 72.6% of total revenues. Total expenses increased by $6,839,649 or 4.9% from the prior year led by an increase of 6.0% in streets and highways expenses. Governmental Activities

Governmental activities include programs for streets and highways, transportation services, and metropolitan planning. Governmental activities decreased the RTC’s net position by $45,613,306. Key elements of this decrease are:

Streets and highways expenses increased over the prior year, increasing $5,164,880 or 6.0% due to increased road construction expenses; and

Transportation services expenses increased $493,639 or 7.2% due to increased operating revenue hours and an increase in the turnkey contract rate per revenue hour for paratransit services; and

Debt service expenses increased $1,481,738, an 11.8% increase over the prior year. The following chart depicts the expenses and program revenues for governmental activities:

$6,169,895

$3,623,539 $1,320,686

$91,015,767

$7,387,322

$2,802,772

$0

$10,000,000

$20,000,000

$30,000,000

$40,000,000

$50,000,000

$60,000,000

$70,000,000

$80,000,000

$90,000,000

$100,000,000

Expenses and Program Revenues - Governmental Activities FY 2013

Program Revenues Program Expenses

9

Page 27: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

The following chart depicts the governmental activities revenues for the current and prior fiscal years:

The following chart depicts the governmental activities expenses by function for the current and prior fiscal years:

$41.8

$9.7

$8.5

$8.6

$1.4

$0.2

$35.3

$9.6

$7.7

$0.6

$1.9

$1.1

$0.0 $10.0 $20.0 $30.0 $40.0

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax

Grants and Contributions

Public Transportation Tax

Regional Road Impact Fees

Charges for Services

Investment Earnings

Governmental Activities - General & Program Revenues (in millions)

FY 2012 FY 2013

$91.0

$14.1

$7.4

$2.8

$85.9

$12.6

$6.9

$3.5

Streets and Highways

Interest on Long Term Debt

Transportation Services

Metropolitan Planning

$0.0 $20.0 $40.0 $60.0 $80.0 $100.0

Governmental Activities - Expenses by Function (in millions)

FY 2012 FY 2013

10

Page 28: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

Business-type Activities

Under this section there is only one program, Public Transportation. Business-type activities decreased the RTC’s net position by $386,216. The key element of this slight decrease is:

Public transportation operating expenditures increased $348,442 due to increases in depreciation expense for new buses, building improvements, and communication equipment, a 1.2% increase over the prior year.

The following chart depicts the expenses and revenues for business-type activities:

$30,109,937 $29,162,613

$0

$5,000,000

$10,000,000

$15,000,000

$20,000,000

$25,000,000

$30,000,000

$35,000,000

Expenses and Revenues - Business-type Activities

Expenses Revenues

11

Page 29: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (CONTINUED)

The following chart depicts the business-type activities revenues for current and prior fiscal years:

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE RTC’S FUNDS

As noted earlier, the RTC uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. Governmental Funds

The focus of the RTC’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the RTC’s financing requirements. In particular, unrestricted fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. As of the end of the current fiscal year, the RTC’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $261,097,570 an increase of $129,146,238 in comparison with the prior year primarily due to increases in restricted cash and investments from the sale of revenue bonds. Most of RTC’s governmental fund balances are externally restricted and limited in their use.

$12.9

$9.5

$6.7

$0.1

$12.5

$8.1

$6.7

$0.4

Public Transportation Tax

Grants and Contributions

Charges for Services

Other Miscellaneous

$0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0

Millions

Business-type Activities Revenues (in millions)

FY 2012 FY 2013

12

Page 30: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE RTC’S FUNDS (CONTINUED)

General Fund The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the RTC. It accounts for all financial resources of the RTC, except for those required to be accounted for in another fund. Regional streets and highways expenditures for road projects are accounted for in this fund instead of a separate fund in order to reduce undue complexity in budgeting, accounting and other phases of financial management. At the end of the current fiscal year, the nonspendable fund balance of the general fund was $182,068 for prepaid expenses and deposits. Restricted fund balance was $215,711,144 for road construction projects. Unassigned fund balance for the General Fund was zero. The fund balance of the RTC’s General Fund increased by $122,466,943 during the current fiscal year. A key element of this increase is:

Restricted cash and investments increased $111,109,349 mostly due to the sale of revenue bonds used for road construction project expenditures accounted for in the Regional Road Impact Fee Fund.

Debt Service Fund The Debt Service Fund is a governmental fund used to account for RTC’s debt service requirements. The ending fund balance at June 30, 2013, is $39,739,559 and is restricted for future principal and interest payments on revenue bonds.

Regional Road Impact Fee Fund

The Regional Road Impact Fee Fund is a special revenue fund for road projects funded with impact fees. The fees consist of two components, cash impact fees and impact fee credits. Credits are given to developers for the construction of major arterial roads during development. Credits are booked as a revenue and expenditure with a net zero effect on the financial statements, therefore, they are not included in analysis of fund balance. The ending fund balance at June 30, 2013, is $2,948,410 all of which is restricted for road construction projects. The Regional Road Impact Fee fund balance decreased $904,376 for the current fiscal year. The key factors of this decrease are:

Streets and highways expenditures increased $4,694,577 net of impact fee credits, a 8.8% increase over the prior year due to increases in road construction projects in the current fiscal year; and

Due from other governments decreased $3,572,745, a 99.8% decrease over the prior year, due reduced contributions from other governments for road construction projects.

Paratransit Services Fund

The Paratransit Services Fund is a special revenue fund, which consists of the paratransit service RTC ACCESS for people with disabilities. The Paratransit Services Fund also records all transactions for the Washoe Senior Ride Program, a taxi subsidy for elderly residents of Washoe County. The ending fund balance at June 30, 2013, is $1,824,010 of which $109,609 is nonspendable for prepaid expenses, $1,285,296 is restricted for grants and $429,105 is assigned for future expenditures. Unassigned fund balance is a zero. The Paratransit Services fund balance increased $1,059,735 for the current fiscal year. The key factor of this increase is:

Federal grant revenue increased $2,479,167, a 341.0% increase over the prior year; mostly due to the federally funded capital purchase of fifteen new passenger vans used for providing paratransit services.

13

Page 31: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE RTC’S FUNDS (CONTINUED)

RTC ACCESS service levels were flat for the current fiscal year due to slight increases in public transportation (sales) tax revenue which is the program’s primary funding source. The operating statistics for RTC ACCESS are:

RTC ACCESS carried a total of 232,776 passengers in FY 2013 compared with 222,593 in FY 2012; and

RTC ACCESS operated 82,637 revenue vehicle hours in FY 2013 compared with 81,119 hours in FY 2012; and

RTC ACCESS traveled 1,341,109 revenue vehicle miles in FY 2013 compared to 1,281,359 miles in FY 2012.

Metropolitan Planning Organization Fund The Metropolitan Planning Organization Fund is a special revenue fund. The RTC serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for Washoe County. The MPO is funded by transfers of public transportation (sales) tax revenues, fuel tax revenues and federal transportation planning grants. The Metropolitan Planning Organization ending fund balance at June 30, 2013, is $692,379, of which $47,157 is nonspendable for prepaid expenses and $645,222 is assigned for future expenditures. The total fund balance increased $57,518 for the current fiscal year. The key factors of this increase are:

Federal revenue increased $106,503, a 10.8% increase over the prior year mostly due to increases in federally funded consulting contracts for the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP); and

MPO operating expenditures decreased $631,758, an 18.8% decrease over the prior year due to decreases in labor and consulting services.

Proprietary Fund

The RTC’s proprietary fund provides the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements but this fund’s statements provide more detail. Proprietary Operations

The proprietary fund consists of an enterprise fund for the RTC RIDE transit system. The RTC RIDE transit system has been in operation since September, 1978. RTC RIDE regular service levels were flat during the current fiscal year due to slight increases in public transportation tax revenue which is the program’s primary funding source. The operating statistics for RTC RIDE are:

RTC RIDE carried a total of 8,050,950 passengers in FY 2013 compared to 7,973,480 passengers in FY 2012; and

RTC RIDE operated 249,569 revenue service hours in FY 2013 compared to 252,827 revenue service hours in FY 2012; and

RTC RIDE traveled 2,817,697 revenue miles in FY 2013 compared to 2,851,407 revenue miles in FY 2012.

RTC RIDE currently operates 26 total routes, including RTC SIERRA SPIRIT, RTC RAPID and RTC INTERCITY most of which operate seven days a week with three routes operating 24 hours per day. Revenues The revenue sources for the RTC RIDE transit system are a 5/16 percent public transportation tax revenue, passenger revenues, investment income, advertising revenue, and Federal and State capital and operating grants. In November 1982, voters of Washoe County approved a 1/4 percent sales tax increase for the purpose of public transportation and related support services. This tax is to be used for the operation of the RTC RIDE transit system, transportation planning, paratransit services, and other transportation services. This revenue source cannot be used for the construction of street and highway projects. Effective July 1, 2003, an additional 1/16 percent sales tax for public transportation was implemented. This revenue source can also be used for the construction of street and highway projects as directed by RTC management.

14

Page 32: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE RTC’S FUNDS (CONTINUED) Proprietary Operations (continued) In total Public Transportation tax revenue was $21,385,914 in FY 2013 compared to $20,198,776 in FY 2012, an increase of $1,187,138 or 5.9% due to marginal increases in retail sales. RTC RIDE passenger revenues were $5,959,133 in FY 2013 compared to $5,916,656 in FY 2012, a slight increase of $42,477 or 0.7% due to marginal increases in ridership. Federal funding amounts, received from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), are based on nationwide formula allocations included in the Surface Transportation Act and discretionary grants. In the past, the RTC has built or purchased five major facilities and currently has a total fleet of 82 coaches. The FTA has participated in most of the transit and paratransit capital acquisitions. Expenses RTC RIDE operating expenses, including depreciation, in FY 2013 were $30,109,937 compared to $29,761,495 in FY 2012, an increase of $348,442 or 1.2%; primarily due to a $515,030 increase in depreciation expenses which was offset by $166,588 decreases in labor, services and turn-key contract operating costs.

GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS

During the year no changes were made to the original budget. Total revenues were $1,749,446 under budget primarily due to reduction in federal highways grant revenue. Total expenditures were $15,069,053 under budget due to the timing of road construction projects. CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION Capital Assets

The RTC’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business-type activities as of June 30, 2013 amounted to $85,477,329 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets includes eight new hybrid buses, fifteen new CNG vans, building improvements, and computer hardware and software. The RTC’s investment in capital assets for the current fiscal year increased $1,462,525 or 1.7%. Capital spending decisions are based upon:

Needs defined in the Regional Transportation Plan, and

The availability of FTA funding and local funding

Major capital assets events during the current fiscal year included the following:

Purchase of eight new hybrid busses for RIDE at a cost of $5,144,352.

Purchase of fifteen new passenger vans for ACCESS at a cost of $1,653,603.

Villanova facility building improvements including a new roof and maintenance lift at a total cost of $606,248.

Next Bus arrival system software and equipment for RIDE and new network servers at a total cost of $189,421.

15

Page 33: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION (CONTINUED) Capital Assets (continued)

Additional information on the RTC’s capital assets can be found in Note F in the Notes to the Financial Statements and the Supplementary Information section. Long-term Debt

At the end of the fiscal year, RTC had total bonded debt outstanding of $423,341,000. The proceeds from all bond issues are used for financing the construction of street and highway projects. RTC’s current fiscal year outstanding debt increased $159 million due to the sale of revenue bonds. The RTC has medium-term financing in the form of a $7.5 million line of credit of which zero was outstanding at the end of the fiscal year. This line of credit is intended to be used for medium-term borrowing due to timing of reimbursements in the streets and highways function. Additional information of the RTC’s long-term debt can be found in Notes J and K in the Notes to the Financial Statements.

2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012

Land 875$ 1,661$ 16,682$ 15,896$ 17,557$ 17,557$

Construction in progress 151 - 171 138 322 138

Total capital assets

not being depreciated 1,026 1,661 16,853 16,034 17,879 17,695

Coaches/vehicles 5,544 4,660 36,434 37,401 41,978 42,061

Buildings and leasehold

improvements 7,192 7,192 50,390 49,802 57,582 56,994

Miscellaneous equipment 3,920 4,093 2,144 2,578 6,064 6,671

ITS - - 3,063 3,066 3,063 3,066

Computer equipment - - 1,207 1,190 1,207 1,190

Office furniture - - 138 167 138 167

Passenger shelters - - 7,543 7,498 7,543 7,498

Communications equipment - - 433 299 433 299

Revenue collection equipment - - 1,381 1,946 1,381 1,946

16,656 15,945 102,733 103,947 119,389 119,892

Accumulated depreciation (11,800) (11,687) (39,991) (41,885) (51,791) (53,572)

Total capital assets

being depreciated (net) 4,856 4,258 62,742 62,062 67,598 66,320

Capital assets (net) 5,882$ 5,919$ 79,595$ 78,096$ 85,477$ 84,015$

RTC's CAPITAL ASSETS (Net of Depreciation)

Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total

(Expressed in Thousands)

16

Page 34: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - CONTINUED

June 30, 2013

ECONOMIC FACTORS

Nevada economy continues to grow at a moderate pace as it progressively recovers from the recession.

Nevada unemployment rate of 9.6% remains higher than the national average of 7.6% for June 2013.

Reno-Sparks unemployment rate was at 9.8% in June 2013.

Unemployment in Nevada decreased 2.0% over the past twelve months. In the Reno-Sparks metropolitan area, the rate declined 1.9%.

Professional jobs in the State declined by 900 in June of 2013 as compared to June of 2012.

Washoe County’s total labor force is estimated at 221,700, with total employment of 199,900.

Consumer Price Index (CPI) was 1.5% for the western region for June 2013.

Nevada’s statewide taxable sales increased 5.2% for FY 2013. Reno-Sparks taxable sales increased 5.5% for FY 2013.

Home prices in Washoe County increased 30.6% in June of 2013 as compared to June of 2012.

More modern, fuel-efficient vehicles and the increased usage of vehicles employing alternate technologies (such as electric cars) have caused fuel consumption to decrease over prior years. Washoe County fuel consumption was down 1.0% for FY 2013, however, Nevada’s statewide fuel consumption was up 0.2% for FY 2013.

All of these factors were considered in preparing the RTC’s budget for the next fiscal year. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the RTC’s finances for all those with an interest in the RTC’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Chief Financial Officer, Regional Transportation Commission, 1105 Terminal Way, Suite 300, Reno, NV 89502.

17

Page 35: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page 36: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Governmental

Activities

Business-type

Activities Total

Assets

Cash in custody of County Treasurer $ 39,267,175 $ 7,768,461 $ 47,035,636

Cash in bank and on hand 16,061,312 4,468,173 20,529,485

Restricted cash and investments 212,693,676 - 212,693,676

Accounts receivable 232,533 100,581 333,114

Due from federal government 3,571,085 3,015,352 6,586,437

Due from State of Nevada 7,217,504 3,766,198 10,983,702

Interest receivable 1,830,199 30,429 1,860,628

Impact fees receivable 467,738 - 467,738

Internal balances 1,505,958 (1,505,958) -

Inventory - 179,840 179,840

Prepaid expenses and deposits 338,834 553,219 892,053

Assets held for resale 946,936 - 946,936

Capital Assets:

Land and construction in progress 1,026,153 16,853,061 17,879,214

Property, buildings, and equipment, net

of accumulated depreciation 4,855,968 62,742,147 67,598,115

Total assets 290,015,071 97,971,503 387,986,574

Liabilities

Accounts payable 16,181,221 1,779,725 17,960,946

Retentions payable 2,460,141 - 2,460,141

Accrued liabilities 226,638 140,890 367,528

Unearned revenue 12,500 80,033 92,533

Interest payable 8,590,984 - 8,590,984

Noncurrent liabilities:

Due within one year 6,887,436 - 6,887,436

Due in more than one year 428,451,447 - 428,451,447

Other postemployment benefits 1,534,559 558,811 2,093,370

Total liabilities 464,344,926 2,559,459 466,904,385

Net Position

Net investment in capital assets 5,882,121 79,595,208 85,477,329

Restricted for:

Street and highway construction 218,659,554 - 218,659,554

Grants 1,285,296 - 1,285,296

Debt service 39,739,559 - 39,739,559

Unrestricted (439,896,385) 15,816,836 (424,079,549)

Total net position $ (174,329,855) $ 95,412,044 $ (78,917,811)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Primary Government

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION

June 30, 2013

19

Page 37: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

FUNCTIONS/PROGRAMS

Expenses

Charges for

Services

Operating Grants

and

Contributions

Primary government

Governmental activities:

Streets and highways $ 91,015,767 $ 712,982 $ 5,456,913

Transportation services 7,387,322 693,422 1,366,797

Metropolitan planning 2,802,772 - 1,320,686

Interest on long term debt 14,065,904 - -

Total governmental activities 115,271,765 1,406,404 8,144,396

Business-type activities:

Public transportation 30,109,937 6,696,026 3,989,322

Total primary government $ 145,381,702 $ 8,102,430 $ 12,133,718

General revenues:

Motor vehicle fuel tax

Public transportation tax

Regional road impact fees

Investment earnings

Gain on sale of capital assets

Miscellaneous

Transfers

Total general revenues and transfers

Change in net position

Net position - beginning

Prior period adjustment (Note C)

Net position - beginning, as adjusted

Net position - ending

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

For the year ended June 30, 2013

Program Revenues

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES

20

Page 38: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Capital Grants

and

Contributions

Governmental

Activities

Business-type

Activities Total

$ - $ (84,845,872) $ - $ (84,845,872)

1,563,320 (3,763,783) - (3,763,783)

- (1,482,086) - (1,482,086)

- (14,065,904) - (14,065,904)

1,563,320 (104,157,645) - (104,157,645)

5,462,720 - (13,961,869) (13,961,869)

$ 7,026,040 (104,157,645) (13,961,869) (118,119,514)

41,827,886 - 41,827,886

8,459,319 12,926,595 21,385,914

8,597,569 - 8,597,569

207,242 35,051 242,293

10,498 38,349 48,847

2,933 14,550 17,483

(561,108) 561,108 -

58,544,339 13,575,653 72,119,992

(45,613,306) (386,216) (45,999,522)

(125,744,891) 95,798,260 (29,946,631)

(2,971,658) - (2,971,658)

(128,716,549) 95,798,260 (32,918,289)

$ (174,329,855) $ 95,412,044 $ (78,917,811)

Changes in Net Position

Net (Expense) Revenue and

Program Revenues

21

Page 39: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Debt

Service

Fund

Cash in custody of County Treasurer $ 32,279,154 $ 15,082

Cash in bank and on hand 3,984,561 3,473

Restricted cash and investments 173,042,522 39,651,154

Accounts receivable 66,763 -

Due from federal government 273,578 -

Due from other governments 7,194,663 -

Interest receivable 93,125 1,719,001

Impact fees receivable - -

Prepaids 179,883 -

Due from other funds 2,420,691 -

Deposits 2,185 -

Assets held for resale - -

Total assets $ 219,537,125 $ 41,388,710

Liabilities

Accounts payable $ 2,633,909 $ 12,876

Retentions payable 490,110 -

Accrued liabilities 226,638 -

Due to other funds 46,964 -

Unearned revenue - -

Total liabilities 3,397,621 12,876

Deferred Inflows of Resources

Unavailable revenue - federal grants 183,779 -

Unavailable revenue - state grants - -

Unavailable revenue - project reimbursements 62,513 -

Deferred Build America Bond credits - 1,636,275

Total deferred inflows of resources 246,292 1,636,275

Fund balances

Nonspendable:

Prepaids 179,883 -

Deposits 2,185 -

Restricted for:

Grants - -

Street and highway construction 215,711,144 -

Debt service - 39,739,559

Assigned

Subsequent year's actual & budget: appropriation

of fund balance - -

Total fund balances 215,893,212 39,739,559

Total liabilities and fund balances $ 219,537,125 $ 41,388,710

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Major Funds

Assets

Fund

General

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

BALANCE SHEET

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

June 30, 2013

22

Page 40: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

$ 5,717,039 $ 1,047,385 $ 208,515 $ 39,267,175

10,834,769 253,917 984,592 16,061,312

- - - 212,693,676

86,227 79,543 - 232,533

1,882,414 1,005,580 409,513 3,571,085

7,676 15,165 - 7,217,504

16,001 1,802 270 1,830,199

467,738 - - 467,738

- 109,609 47,157 336,649

2,000 - - 2,422,691

- - - 2,185

946,936 - - 946,936

$ 19,960,800 $ 2,513,001 $ 1,650,047 $ 285,049,683

$ 12,938,495 $ 481,555 $ 114,386 $ 16,181,221

1,970,031 - - 2,460,141

- - - 226,638

243,729 192,271 433,769 916,733

12,500 - - 12,500

15,164,755 673,826 548,155 19,797,233

1,836,360 - 409,513 2,429,652

7,675 15,165 - 22,840

3,600 - - 66,113

- - - 1,636,275

1,847,635 15,165 409,513 4,154,880

- 109,609 47,157 336,649

- - - 2,185

- 1,285,296 - 1,285,296

2,948,410 - - 218,659,554

- - - 39,739,559

- 429,105 645,222 1,074,327

2,948,410 1,824,010 692,379 261,097,570

$ 19,960,800 $ 2,513,001 $ 1,650,047 $ 285,049,683

Metropolitan

Major Funds Nonmajor Fund

Regional Road

Impact Fee

Fund

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

BALANCE SHEET

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

June 30, 2013

Total

Governmental

Funds

Paratransit

Services

Fund

Planning

Fund

Organization

23

Page 41: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Total fund balances - Governmental Funds $ 261,097,570

Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement

of net position are different because:

Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial

resources, and therefore, are not reported in governmental funds.

Capital assets used in the operation of governmental funds $ 17,682,599

Less accumulated depreciation (11,800,478) 5,882,121

Other long-term assets are not available to pay for current period

expenditures and, therefore, are reported as unavailable revenue

in the funds. 4,154,880

Long-term liabilities, including bonds payable and accrued interest, are not

due and payable in the current period, and therefore, are not reported in

governmental funds.

Governmental bonds payable (423,341,000)

Bond premiums and discounts (11,033,205)

Accrued interest payable (8,590,984)

Compensated absences (964,678)

Other postemployment benefits (OPEB) (1,534,559) (445,464,426)

Net position of governmental activities $ (174,329,855)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION

24

Page 42: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Debt

Service

Revenues

Motor vehicle fuel tax $ 41,827,886 $ - $ -

Public transportation tax 3,564,319 - -

Impact fees - - 8,597,569

Passenger fares - - -

Project reimbursements 675,219 - 40,497

Transportation planning, operating and capital grants:

State of Nevada Department of Transportation - - 6,017,207

Federal Transit Administration 172,805 - -

Federal Highway Administration 744,834 - 704,878

Investment income 55,420 142,878 6,994

Miscellaneous 2,885 - 15,786

Total revenues 47,043,368 142,878 15,382,931

Expenditures

Current:

Streets and highways 23,601,218 - 67,159,375

Transportation services - - -

Metropolitan planning - - -

Capital outlay:

Equipment 206,163 - -

Debt service:

Principal - 5,788,000 -

Interest - 12,496,722 -

Bond issuance costs - 36,617 -

Total expenditures 23,807,381 18,321,339 67,159,375

Excess (deficiency) of revenues over

(under) expenditures 23,235,987 (18,178,461) (51,776,444)

Other financing sources (uses)

Debt issuance 165,000,000 - -

Bond premium 11,022,903 - -

Sale of capital assets - - -

Transfers in - 24,644,879 50,872,068

Transfers out (76,791,947) - -

Total other financing sources (uses) 99,230,956 24,644,879 50,872,068

Net change in fund balances 122,466,943 6,466,418 (904,376)

Fund balances - beginning 93,426,269 33,273,141 3,852,786

Fund balances - ending $ 215,893,212 $ 39,739,559 $ 2,948,410

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

General

Regional Road

Impact Fee

Fund

Year ended June 30, 2013

Major Funds

25

Page 43: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

$ - $ - $ 41,827,886

4,895,000 - 8,459,319

- - 8,597,569

693,422 - 693,422

- - 715,716

15,663 189,464 6,222,334

3,190,460 172,869 3,536,134

- 917,097 2,366,809

(914) 2,864 207,242

193,740 - 212,411

8,987,371 1,282,294 72,838,842

- - 90,760,593

6,246,697 - 6,246,697

- 2,724,776 2,724,776

1,691,437 - 1,897,600

- - 5,788,000

- - 12,496,722

- - 36,617

7,938,134 2,724,776 119,951,005

1,049,237 (1,442,482) (47,112,163)

- - 165,000,000

- - 11,022,903

10,498 - 10,498

- 1,500,000 77,016,947

- - (76,791,947)

10,498 1,500,000 176,258,401

1,059,735 57,518 129,146,238

764,275 634,861 131,951,332

$ 1,824,010 $ 692,379 $ 261,097,570

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

Year ended June 30, 2013

Funds

Paratransit

Services

Fund

Planning

Organization

Fund

Metropolitan

Total

Governmental

Nonmajor Fund

26

Page 44: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Net change in fund balances - total governmental funds $ 129,146,238

Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement

of activities are different because:

Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However in the

statement of activities the cost of these assets are allocated over their estimated

useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which

depreciation expense exceeded capital outlay in the current period.

Capital outlay $ 1,897,600

Current year depreciation expense (1,148,572) 749,028

Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current

financial resources are not reported as revenues in governmental funds. (2,629,772)

The net effect of various miscellaneous transactions involving capital assets

(i.e., sales and transfers) is to decrease net assets. (786,108)

The issuance of long-term debt (e.g., bonds, leases) provides current financial

resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long-

term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds.

Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net position. Also, governmental

funds report the effect of bond premiums, discounts, and similar items

when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and

amortized in the statement of activities. This amount is the net effect of these

differences in the treatment of long-term debt and related items.

Bond issue (165,000,000)

Bond premium (11,022,903)

Principal payments 5,788,000

Amortization of bond premium and discounts 178,561 (170,056,342)

Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the

use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as

expenditures in governmental funds.

Change in compensated absences (44,918)

Change in other post-employment benefits (OPEB) (243,689)

Change in accrued interest payable (1,591,822)

Change in interest credits due from federal government (155,921) (2,036,350)

Change in net position of governmental activities $ (45,613,306)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES

Year ended June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

27

Page 45: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Actual

Original Final Amounts

Revenues

Motor vehicle fuel tax 41,576,284$ 41,576,284$ 41,827,886$ $ 251,602

Public transportation tax 3,435,932 3,435,932 3,564,319 128,387

Project reimbursements 1,258,180 1,258,180 675,219 (582,961)

Transportation planning and operating grants:

Federal Transit Administration - - 172,805 172,805

Federal Highway Administration 1,896,918 1,896,918 744,834 (1,152,084)

Investment income 625,500 625,500 55,420 (570,080)

Miscellaneous - - 2,885 2,885

Total revenues 48,792,814 48,792,814 47,043,368 (1,749,446)

Expenditures

Current:

Streets and highways 38,737,510 38,737,510 23,601,218 15,136,292

Capital outlay:

Equipment 138,924 138,924 206,163 (67,239)

Total expenditures 38,876,434 38,876,434 23,807,381 15,069,053

Excess (deficiency) of revenues over

(under) expenditures 9,916,380 9,916,380 23,235,987 13,319,607

Other financing sources (uses)

Debt issuance - - 165,000,000 165,000,000

Bond premium - - 11,022,903 11,022,903

Transfers out (93,020,300) (93,020,300) (76,791,947) 16,228,353

Total other financing sources (uses) (93,020,300) (93,020,300) 99,230,956 192,251,256

Net change in fund balance (83,103,920) (83,103,920) 122,466,943 205,570,863

Fund balance - beginning 87,359,136 87,359,136 93,426,269 6,067,133

Fund balance - ending 4,255,216$ $ 4,255,216 215,893,212$ $ 211,637,996

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES

AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

Final Budget

GENERAL FUND

Budgeted Amounts

Year ended June 30, 2013

Variance to

28

Page 46: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Original Final

Revenues

Impact fees $ 29,550,000 $ 29,550,000 $ 8,597,569 $ (20,952,431)

Project reimbursements 5,000 5,000 40,497 35,497

Transportation planning and capital grants:

State of Nevada Department of

Transportation 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,017,207 17,207

Federal Highway Administration 8,706,500 8,706,500 704,878 (8,001,622)

Investment income 250,000 250,000 6,994 (243,006)

Miscellaneous - - 15,786 15,786

Total revenues 44,511,500 44,511,500 15,382,931 (29,128,569)

Expenditures

Current:

Streets and highways 120,503,918 120,503,918 67,159,375 53,344,543

Total expenditures 120,503,918 120,503,918 67,159,375 53,344,543

DEFICIENCY OF REVENUESDeficiency of revenues under

UNDER EXPENDITURES expenditures (75,992,418) (75,992,418) (51,776,444) 24,215,974

Other financing sources

Transfers in 72,180,000 72,180,000 50,872,068 (21,307,932)

Total other financing sources 72,180,000 72,180,000 50,872,068 (21,307,932)

BALANCENet change in fund balance (3,812,418) (3,812,418) (904,376) 2,908,042

Fund balance - beginning 6,762,375 6,762,375 3,852,786 (2,909,589)

Fund balance - ending $ 2,949,957 $ 2,949,957 $ 2,948,410 $ (1,547)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Year ended June 30, 2013

Actual

Amounts

Budgeted Amounts

Final Budget

Variance to

(Regional Road Impact Fee Fund)

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES

AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

29

Page 47: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Actual

Original Final Amounts

Revenues

Public transportation tax 4,200,000$ 4,200,000$ $ 4,895,000 $ 695,000

Passenger fares 941,584 941,584 693,422 (248,162)

Transportation planning and capital grants:

State of Nevada Department

of Transportation - - 15,663 15,663

Federal Transit Administration 3,034,235 3,034,235 3,190,460 156,225

Investment income 15,000 15,000 (914) (15,914)

Miscellaneous 125,000 125,000 193,740 68,740

Total revenues 8,315,819 8,315,819 8,987,371 671,552

Expenditures

Current:

Transportation services 6,555,313 6,555,313 6,246,697 308,616

Capital outlay:

Equipment 1,806,219 1,806,219 1,691,437 114,782

Total expenditures 8,361,532 8,361,532 7,938,134 423,398

Excess (deficiency) of revenues over

(under) expenditures (45,713) (45,713) 1,049,237 1,094,950

Other financing sources

Sale of capital assets 23,000 23,000 10,498 (12,502)

Total other financing sources 23,000 23,000 10,498 (12,502)

Net change in fund balance (22,713) (22,713) 1,059,735 1,082,448

Fund balance - beginning 181,532 181,532 764,275 582,743

Fund balance - ending $ 158,819 $ 158,819 $ 1,824,010 $ 1,665,191

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Final Budget

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

Budgeted Amounts

(Paratransit Services Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES

AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

Variance to

30

Page 48: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Assets 2013 2012

Current assets:

Cash in custody of County Treasurer 7,768,461$ 12,434,137$

Cash in bank and on hand 4,468,173 571,361

Accounts receivable 100,581 135,953

Due from federal government 3,015,352 3,939,212

Due from State of Nevada 3,766,198 3,537,502

Interest receivable 30,429 41,086

Due from other funds 63,579 21,193

Inventory 179,840 172,372

Prepaid expenses 553,219 732,310

Total current assets 19,945,832 21,585,126

Noncurrent assets:

Property, buildings, and equipment, net 79,595,208 78,095,603

Total assets 99,541,040 99,680,729

Liabilities

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable 1,779,725 1,942,182

Retentions payable - 119,838

Accrued liabilities 140,890 492,179

Unearned revenue 80,033 26,550

Due to other funds 1,569,537 854,523

Total current liabilities 3,570,185 3,435,272

Noncurrent liabilities:

Net other post-employment benefit obligations 558,811 447,197

Total liabilities 4,128,996 3,882,469

Net Position

Net investment in capital assets 79,595,208 78,095,603

Unrestricted 15,816,836 17,702,657

Total net position 95,412,044$ 95,798,260$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

(Public Transit Fund)

June 30, 2013

with comparative amounts at June 30, 2012

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION

PROPRIETARY FUND

ENTERPRISE FUND

31

Page 49: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2013 2012

Operating revenues:

Passenger fares 5,959,133$ 5,916,656$

Bus advertising 277,131 347,714

Rental income 459,762 434,235

Miscellaneous 14,550 29,669

Total operating revenues 6,710,576 6,728,274

Operating expenses:

General administration 24,651,153 24,817,741

Depreciation 5,458,784 4,943,754

Total operating expenses 30,109,937 29,761,495

Operating loss (23,399,361) (23,033,221)

Nonoperating revenues:

Operating subsidies:

Federal government grants 3,989,322 3,482,964

Other revenue:

Public transportation tax 5,797,957 5,739,388

Public transportation taxes pledged as security for

Series 2010H revenue bonds 7,128,638 6,732,925

Investment income 35,051 320,859

Gain on sale of capital assets 38,349 2,930

Total nonoperating revenues 16,989,317 16,279,066

Loss before capital contributions

and transfers (6,410,044) (6,754,155)

Capital contributions:

Federal grants 5,462,720 4,579,825

Contributions from other funds 786,108 -

Total capital contributions 6,248,828 4,579,825

Transfers:

Transfers out (225,000) (337,500)

Total transfers (225,000) (337,500)

Change in net position (386,216) (2,511,830)

Net position - beginning 95,798,260 98,310,090

Net position - ending 95,412,044$ 95,798,260$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION

PROPRIETARY FUND

ENTERPRISE FUND

(Public Transit Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

With comparative amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

32

Page 50: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2013 2012

Cash flows from operating activities

Cash received from customers 6,503,852$ 6,629,237$

Cash received from other funds 254,316 230,350

Cash payments to suppliers for goods and services (22,583,145) (21,903,213)

Cash compensation and employee benefits (1,706,567) (2,929,488)

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities (17,531,544) (17,973,114)

Cash flows from noncapital financing activities

Operating grants 4,343,099 9,745,610

Transfers to other funds (225,000) (337,500)

Public transportation tax received 12,700,002 12,346,983

Net cash provided by (used for) noncapital financing activities 16,818,101 21,755,093

Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:

Acquisition of capital assets (6,172,281) (5,000,612)

Capital contributions 6,032,803 3,936,079

Proceeds from the sale of capital assets 38,349 2,930

Net cash provided by (used for) capital and related

financing activities (101,129) (1,061,603)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Investment income 45,708 314,978

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents (768,864) 3,035,354

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning 13,005,498 9,970,144

Cash and cash equivalents - ending 12,236,634$ 13,005,498$

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

PROPRIETARY FUND

ENTERPRISE FUND

(Public Transit Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

With comparative amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

33

Page 51: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2013 2012

Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash used in

operating activities:

Operating loss $ (23,399,361) $ (23,033,221)

Adjustments to reconcile operating loss

to net cash used for operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization expense 5,458,784 4,943,754

Decrease in accounts receivable 33,269 127,069

Decrease (increase) in inventory (7,468) 320,412

Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses 179,091 (203,164)

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (162,457) 978,088

Decrease in other liabilities 366,598 (1,106,052)

Total adjustments 5,867,817 5,060,107

Net cash used for operating activities $ (17,531,544) $ (17,973,114)

Schedule of non-cash investing, capital, and

financing activities:

Transfer of capital asset from governmental fund $ 786,108 $ -

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

PROPRIETARY FUND - CONTINUED

ENTERPRISE FUND

(Public Transit Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

With comparative amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

34

Page 52: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting policies of the Regional Transportation Commission of Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada (RTC) conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), as applicable to governments. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the standard setting body for governmental accounting and financial reporting. The GASB periodically updates its codification of the existing Governmental and Financial Reporting Standards which, along with subsequent GASB pronouncements, constitutes GAAP for governmental units. A summary of RTC’s significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements follows. Reporting Entity

The Regional Transportation Commission of Reno, Sparks and Washoe County was created through an interlocal cooperative agreement signed in May 1978 by Washoe County, the City of Reno and the City of Sparks. It became the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) in July 1979. The agreement was amended in 1985 when these three public entities delegated their powers to the Commission in order to consolidate the administration and operation of public mass transportation in Washoe County. The Commission operates as a governing board with two representatives selected by the Washoe County Board of Commissioners, two representatives selected by the City Council of the City of Reno and one representative selected by the City Council of the City of Sparks. The RTC’s street and highway construction projects in Washoe County are financed from the motor vehicle fuel tax revenue, public transportation tax revenue, and impact fees for the construction of new roads and capacity improvements on roads impacted by new development. These projects are submitted to the RTC for approval and subsequently to Washoe County, City of Reno, and City of Sparks for approval. An interlocal cooperative agreement, signed by the three public entities mentioned is required before monies can be expended on these construction projects. The infrastructure created by these projects becomes the asset of the applicable public entity (City of Reno, the City of Sparks or Washoe County) upon completion. The RTC is also responsible for the local public transit system, RTC RIDE. Final authority on the budget of the program rests with the RTC. The RTC has allocated public transportation tax receipts to the following operations: (1) RTC RIDE a public bus system in Washoe County; the RTC contracts with a private company, MV Transportation, Incorporated, to operate RTC RIDE; (2) RTC ACCESS a paratransit operation which provides transportation services to the elderly and handicapped population in Washoe County; the RTC contracts with a private company, First Transit, Incorporated, to operate RTC ACCESS; and (3) Tahoe Area Regional Transit (TART) a transit system operating in part in Incline Village, Nevada; TART is operated by Placer County, California; the RTC reimburses Placer County for operating expenses incurred while providing transit service in Washoe County. The accompanying financial statements present the government. The RTC does not have any component units. Government-wide and Fund Financial Statements

The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all of the non-fiduciary activities of the primary government. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a

significant extent on fees and charges for support. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment is offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program revenues include (1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or segment and (2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues.

35

Page 53: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Government-wide and Fund Financial Statements (continued)

Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds and the proprietary fund. Major individual governmental funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation

The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund financial statements. Revenues are recorded when earned, and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of the related cash flows. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met, and allowable expenses are made under the grant provisions. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the government considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Income earned on investments and project reimbursements associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Motor vehicle fuel tax and public transportation tax revenues are derived tax revenues collected by the State of Nevada and shared with the RTC. The RTC recognizes these revenues in the same period as the State. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the government. Generally, expenditures are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences, other postemployment benefits and claims and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due. Project appropriations that have been approved but for which expenditure has not been incurred, are reflected as amounts restricted for project appropriations in the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds. Project appropriations are approved when a cooperative agreement specifying the amount of motor vehicle fuel tax funds, bond proceeds, impact fees or other financing sources to be spent, is executed by all the governing bodies within the jurisdiction of the RTC, or when the project has been added to the program of projects and approved by the RTC Board. The RTC reports the following major governmental funds: General Fund – The General Fund is the RTC’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the

RTC, except for those required to be accounted for in another fund. Regional street and highway expenditures for road projects are accounted for in this fund instead of a separate fund in order to reduce undue complexity in budgeting, accounting and other phases of financial management. Debt Service Fund – The debt service fund accounts for the resources accumulated and payments made for principal

and interest on long-term debt of the governmental funds. Regional Road Impact Fee Fund (Special Revenue Fund) – Monies recovered from impact fees and resources

provided for capacity improvements to the regional road system are accounted for in the Regional Road Impact Fee Fund. Paratransit Services Fund (Special Revenue Fund) – Allocation of public transportation tax, passenger fares, and

federal grants for RTC ACCESS are accounted for in the Paratransit Services Fund.

36

Page 54: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation (continued)

The RTC reports the following major proprietary fund: Public Transit Fund (Enterprise Fund) – Accounts for the operation of RTC RIDE.

Amounts reported as program revenues include (1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges

provided, (2) operating grants and contributions, and (3) capital grants and contributions. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes. The proprietary fund distinguishes operating revenues and expenses from non-operating items. Operating revenues and

expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with the proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the RTC’s proprietary fund are charges to customers for services. Operating expenses for the proprietary fund include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as non-operating revenues and expenses. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the RTC’s policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Temporary Investments

The RTC’s cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits, and temporary investments. A portion of the cash resources of the individual funds are deposited with the Washoe County Treasurer. Those resources are combined with the resources of the County’s funds and other local governments within the County to form a pool of cash and investments. In accordance with 355.170 of Nevada Revised Statutes, Washoe County invested in various treasury notes, mutual funds, commercial paper, bonds, and U.S. Government securities. The RTC’s equity in these securities is reported at fair value. In addition to the cash and investment pool, certain deposits and investments are held separately by RTC funds and reported accordingly. Investments are reported at fair value and changes in fair value are included in investment income. Investment income earned as a result of the above pooling arrangement is distributed by the County Treasurer to the appropriate funds as it is received. Interest receivable at June 30 is calculated by the Treasurer’s office and accrued in the various funds. The investment income is allocated based on each fund’s monthly average cash balance. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the RTC considers all highly liquid investments, including pooled investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted Assets

Restricted assets consist of cash and investments that are restricted in their use by either bond covenants or other external agreements. RTC’s restricted assets consist of remaining bond proceeds for specific road construction projects, unspent grant proceeds and debt service requirements pursuant to bond covenants. Receivables and Payables

Activities between funds that are representative of lending/borrowing arrangements outstanding at the end of the fiscal year are referred to as either “due to/from other funds” (i.e., the current portion of interfund loans) or “advances to/from other funds” (i.e., the non-current portion of interfund loans). All other outstanding balances between funds are reported as “due to/from other funds.” Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government-wide financial statements as “internal balances.”

37

Page 55: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Receivables and Payables (continued)

The RTC considers trade receivables to be fully collectible; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is required. If amounts become uncollectible, they are charged to operations when that determination is made. Inventories and Prepaid Items

The Proprietary fund’s inventory is comprised of bus fuel and is stated at weighted average cost. Inventories of governmental funds, generally consisting of materials and supplies, are recorded as expenditures when purchased rather than when consumed. Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in government-wide, governmental, and proprietary fund financial statements. The RTC uses the consumption method in accounting for prepaids.

Capital Assets

Capital assets, which include property, buildings and equipment, are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the RTC as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $5,000 (amount not rounded) and an estimated useful life in excess of one year. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at the estimated fair value at the date of donation. Infrastructure assets constructed by the street and highway function of the RTC (e.g., roads, bridges, curbs and gutters, streets and sidewalks) are not assets of the RTC, and so have not been capitalized or depreciated. Under the cooperative agreements to build such infrastructure assets, the entities agree that the infrastructure created belongs to the applicable public entity (City of Reno, City of Sparks or Washoe County). The RTC has intangible assets in the form of water rights. The water rights are acquired through right of way land purchases as part of the construction of infrastructure assets. Water rights are separated from land purchases before the land is dedicated to the applicable public entity as part of their completed infrastructure asset. Water rights are not used in the operation of RTC’s street and highway function and are recorded as an investment asset held for resale. Expenditures related to the construction of infrastructure assets are recognized when incurred. Grants, contributions and reimbursements for the construction of infrastructure assets are recognized as operating grants and contributions in the Statement of Activities. Impact fees collected for use in the street and highway function are recognized as general revenues in the Statement of Activities. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset lives are not capitalized.

When capital assets are retired, sold, or otherwise disposed of, the asset’s carrying amount and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the asset accounts and any gain or loss is recorded in the period of disposal. Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are constructed. Interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets of business-type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets constructed. Depreciation of all exhaustible capital assets is charged as an expense against operations. Accumulated depreciation is reported on the Statement of Net Position.

38

Page 56: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Capital Assets (continued)

For both governmental and business-type activities, property, buildings and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Assets

Estimated

Service Life

(Years)

Buildings and building improvements 15-30

Communication equipment 3-5

Computer equipment 3-5

Leasehold improvements 3-20

Miscellaneous fixtures and equipment 4-7

Office furniture and equipment 3-8

Passenger shelters 3 -15

Revenue collection and counting equipment 3-6

Revenue vehicles (buses) 12

Revenue vehicles (vans) 5-7

Support vehicles 5

Safety and security equipment 5-6

Tool and shop equipment 3-12

Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources

In addition to assets, the statement of net position or balance sheet will sometimes report separate sections for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, represents a consumption of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The RTC does not have any items that qualify for reporting in this category. In addition to liabilities, the statement of net position or balance sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element represents an acquisition of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The RTC only has one type of item, which arises only under the modified accrual basis of accounting that qualifies for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item, unavailable revenue, is reported only in the governmental funds balance sheet. The unavailable revenue reported is from three sources, federal grants, state grants, and project reimbursements. The amounts are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in the period that they become available. Compensated Absences

It is the RTC’s policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. A liability is recognized for compensated absences relating to services already rendered that are not contingent on a specific event and are accrued as employees earn the rights to the benefits. Compensated absences relating to future services or that are contingent on a specified event will be accounted for in the period those services are rendered or those events take place. The obligation for compensated absences is accrued when incurred in the government-wide financial statements. For governmental type funds, the compensated absences are reported as fund liabilities only to the extent that those liabilities relate to benefits payable to employees upon termination of their employment as of the fiscal year end.

39

Page 57: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Interfund Activity

As a general rule, the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule include interfund lease payments between the RTC’s street and highways, transportation services and metropolitan planning functions and the business-type activities, public transportation, function. Elimination of these payments would distort the direct costs and program revenues for the various functions concerned. Long-Term Obligations, Bond Discounts and Issuance Costs

In the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary fund Statement of Net Position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the straight-line method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. Prepaid bond insurance costs are reported as deferred charges and amortized over the term of the related debt. Debt issuance costs are expensed during the current period. In fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as expenditures. Equity Classifications

In government-wide statements, equity is classified as net position and displayed in three components:

Net investment in capital assets – consists of capital assets net of accumulated depreciation and reduced by the outstanding balances of any bonds, notes, or other borrowings attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of capital assets.

Restricted – consists of net position subject to constraints that are either (a) externally imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments; or (b) imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.

Unrestricted – all other amounts that do not meet the definition of “restricted” or “net investment in capital assets.”

Fund Balance

In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report the difference between assets and liabilities as fund balance. The following are the classification policies and procedures used for reporting fund balance:

Nonspendable fund balance includes amounts that are not in a spendable form or are required to be legally or contractually maintained intact.

Restricted fund balance includes amounts that can only be spent for the specific purposes where restrictions are externally imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, constitutional provisions, regulations of other governments, or enabling legislation. Effectively, restrictions may only be changed or lifted with the consent of the external party. The RTC has restricted fund balances in the form of monies restricted by the state for special studies, federal grants and enabling legislation.

Committed fund balance includes amounts that can only be used for the specific purposes determined by a formal action of the government’s highest level of decision making authority. Commitments may only be changed or lifted by the government taking the same formal action that imposed the original constraint. The RTC’s Board of Commissioners is the highest level of decision making authority and any fund balance commitments established, modified, or rescinded would require a majority vote of the RTC’s Board of Commissioners.

40

Page 58: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Fund Balance (continued)

Assigned fund balance comprises amounts intended to be used by the government for specific purposes. Intent

can be expressed by the governing body, an official or body to which the governing body delegates the authority. The RTC Board of Commissioners delegates to the Executive Director or his or her designee the authority to assign amounts to be used for specific purposes. Such assignments cannot exceed the available (spendable, unrestricted, uncommitted) fund balance in any particular fund.

Unassigned fund balance is the residual classification for the general fund and includes all amounts not contained in the other classifications. For other governmental funds, the unassigned classification is used only to report a deficit balance resulting from specific purposes for which amounts had been restricted, committed, or assigned.

The RTC will consider restricted fund balance to be spent first for an expenditure for which multiple fund balance classifications are available. Committed fund balance will be spent first, followed by assigned fund balance and then unassigned fund balance when expenditures are incurred for the purposes for which any unrestricted fund balance classification could be used.

Budget Minimum Fund Balance Policy

The RTC Board of Commissioners has adopted a minimum fund balance policy for budget preparation. Fund balance is set aside as a contingency for revenue shortfalls or unanticipated expenditures. Fund balance can also be used to temporarily finance cash flow and to fund self-insurance and capital replacement programs. A minimum fund balance policy establishes the type of fund balances an organization will have, as well as the size and use of those fund balances. It is not the intent of this policy to accumulate unnecessary or excessive levels of fund balance; nor is it to be used to fund regular or ongoing operations. The purpose of this minimum fund balance policy is to:

Provide an overall, long-range approach to financial management.

Ensure that the RTC is able to meet its financial obligations as they arise.

Improve fiscal stability and protect the RTC during a financial emergency.

a. Public Transportation Program Policy Statement The sum of all fund balances for the Public Transportation Program shall be maintained at a minimum amount equal to two months of operating expenditures at June 30 of each fiscal year budget. The maximum fund balance amount would not exceed three months of operating expenditures.

b. Street and Highway Program Policy Statement

The minimum fund balance for the Street and Highway Program shall consist of two components: 1. Operating fund reserves will be maintained at a minimum of 5 percent of operating expenditures. 2. The projects not yet finalized account will be maintained annually at a minimum of $500,000.

The development of the minimum fund balance policy should ensure financial planning and stability for the future.

Comparative Data

Comparative total data for the prior year has been presented only for the enterprise fund in the fund financial statements in order to provide an understanding of the changes in the financial position and operations of this fund. It has been provided to add comparability but is not considered full disclosure of transactions for 2012. Such information can only be obtained by referring to the audited financial statements for that year.

41

Page 59: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

New Accounting Pronouncements

The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has issued GASB Statement No. 60, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Service Concession Arrangements, effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This pronouncement was not applicable to the RTC as of June 30, 2013. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has issued GASB Statement No. 61, The Financial Reporting Entity – Omnibus – An Amendment of GASB Statements No. 14 and No. 34, effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2012. This pronouncement was not applicable to the RTC as of June 30, 2013. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has issued GASB Statement No. 62, Codification of Accounting and Financial Reporting Guidance Contained in Pre-November 30, 1989 FASB and AICPA Pronouncements, effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The RTC has implemented this pronouncement where applicable as of June 30, 2013.

The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has issued GASB Statement No. 63, Financial Reporting of Deferred Outflows of Resources, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Net Position, effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The RTC has implemented this pronouncement where applicable as of June 30, 2013. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has issued GASB Statement No. 64, Derivative Instruments – Application of Hedge Accounting Termination Provisions – An Amendment of GASB Statement No. 53, effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2011. This pronouncement was not applicable to the RTC as of June 30, 2013. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has issued GASB Statement No. 65, Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities, effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The RTC has implemented this pronouncement where applicable as of June 30, 2013. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has issued GASB Statement No. 66, Technical Corrections – 2012, effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The RTC is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this pronouncement. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board has issued GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions; an amendment of GASB Statement No. 27, effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2014. The RTC is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this pronouncement. Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the prior year statement presentations have been reclassified for comparison purposes to conform with current year presentation. NOTE B – STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Budgetary Information

For the year ended June 30, 2013, the RTC established its budget within the legally mandated timeframe.

a. On or before April 15, the Finance Department submits to the Nevada Department of Taxation a tentative

budget for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2012.

b. On May 18, 2012, the Executive Director submitted to the Commissioners a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2012. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures/expenses and the means of financing them.

c. Public hearings were conducted in May to obtain taxpayer comments.

42

Page 60: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE B – STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Budgetary Information (continued)

c. On May 18, 2012, the budget for each fund was adopted through passage of a resolution by a majority vote of the Commissioners of the RTC. The RTC filed the budget directly with the Department of Taxation, State of Nevada.

The following legal requirements were considered in developing the budgetary data which is reflected in the financial statements.

a. Annual budgets for all governmental and proprietary funds are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. The governing body can augment the budget after following public hearing procedures. Unexpended appropriations lapse at year-end.

b. The Executive Director is authorized to transfer appropriations between accounts within the General Fund.

Any revision which alters the total appropriations of a function or fund must be approved in advance prior to year-end by the RTC Board and submitted to the Department of Taxation, State of Nevada.

c. State statute does not require that capital outlay, debt service payments, and other cash transactions normally reflected in the statement of net position of the Proprietary Fund be limited by the budget.

d. Budgeted appropriations generally may not be exceeded by actual expenditures of the various governmental functions in the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, and by operating and non-operating expenses in the Proprietary Fund.

e. Fund equity in the Proprietary Fund may not be a deficit.

Excess of Expenditures over Appropriations and Deficit Fund Equity

The RTC conformed to all significant statutory constraints on its financial administration during the year. NOTE C – ACCOUNTING CHANGE AND RESTATEMENT

During the year, the RTC implemented the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 63, Financial Reporting of Deferred Outflows of Resources, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Net Position, and GASB Statement No. 65, Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities. The implementation required a prior period adjustment to governmental activities net position for RTC’s debt issuance costs in the amount of $2,971,658 that had not been amortized in prior fiscal years. This changed the classification of the balance sheet to include new categories for deferred outflows of resources or deferred inflows of resources and redefined net assets to be net position. In applying these new GASB definitions to the RTC, the primary impact on net position was to write-off deferred bond issuance costs leaving only a balance for bond insurance, if applicable, which is to be amortized over the life of the bonds.

43

Page 61: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE D – CASH AND INVESTMENTS

Deposits

For the year ended June 30, 2013, the RTC had the following cash balances:

Carrying Bank

Amount Balance

On hand 7,029$ 7,029$

Held by others 1,987 1,987

On deposit with bank 20,520,469 21,238,892

Restricted cash from Motor

Vehicle Fuel Tax Revenue Bonds 186,285,423 186,285,423

Total RTC cash and deposits 206,814,908 207,533,331

Washoe County investment pool 47,035,636 47,035,636

Total cash balance 253,850,544$ 254,568,967$

The difference between the carrying amount and bank balance results from outstanding checks and deposits not yet reflected at the bank.

Custodial Credit Risk – Deposits

For deposits, custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the RTC’s deposits may not be returned. The RTC does not have a policy for custodial credit risk; however, the RTC participates through Washoe County in the Nevada State Collateral Pool for public fund deposits. Depository banks are required to place acceptable securities of no less than 102% of the market value of the total deposits of public entities in Nevada with a third party custodian. The collateral pool is administered and monitored by the Nevada State Treasurer’s Office. Due to its participation in the Nevada State Collateral Pool, the RTC’s deposits were fully insured and collateralized, and as such, were not exposed to any custodial credit risk at June 30, 2013.

Pooled Investment Funds

The RTC deposits are maintained in a recognized pooled investment fund under the care of the Washoe County Chief Investment Official (the Washoe County Treasurer) under authority delegated by the Board of County Commissioners. In addition, the Washoe County Treasurer’s External Investment Pool is overseen by an Investment Committee and is included in their annual audit. Pooled investment funds consist of cash deposited in the interest-bearing Washoe County Treasurer’s External Investment Pool. The fair value of the pooled investments deposited in the investment pool is equal to the value of the pool shares. At June 30, 2013, the carrying amount of $47,035,636 recorded at fair value, of the various funds of the RTC in the pool was approximately 11.3% of the County’s total balance. Earnings, realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in the Governmental Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances and the Proprietary Fund’s Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position, captioned as investment income.

Because the RTC’s deposits are maintained in a recognized pooled investment fund under the care of a third party and the RTC’s share of the pool does not consist of specific, identifiable investment securities, no disclosure of the individual deposits and investments or related custodial credit risk classifications is required. The RTC’s deposits in the pool are considered to be highly liquid. The Washoe County audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report indicates that there were no derivatives in the pool as of June 30, 2013. A copy of this report can be obtained at www.co.washoe.nv.us or through a request sent to P.O. Box 11130, Reno, NV 89520.

44

Page 62: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE D – CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) Investments

The RTC has a formal investment policy adopted by the RTC Board of Commissioners that is designed to insure conformity with NRS and seeks to limit exposure to investment risks. State statute authorizes the RTC to invest in the following:

Obligations of the United States or its agencies. Certificates of deposit issued by commercial banks, insured credit unions or savings and loan associations as

well as certain farm loan bonds. Certain securities issued by local governments of the State of Nevada and other securities expressly authorized

by other statutes of the State of Nevada. Bankers acceptances, commercial paper issued by a U.S. corporation or state operating in the U.S., and money

market mutual funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Notes, bonds, and other unconditional obligations for the payment of money issued by corporations organized

and operating in the United States. Investments are recorded at fair value. As of June 30, 2013, the RTC had the following investments and maturities:

Weighted Average Maturities

Investment Type Fair Value Less than 1 1 to 4

U.S. Agency Notes 24,278,054$ -$ 24,278,054$

U.S. Treasuries 1,100,258 - 1,100,258

Corporate Notes 569,937 569,937 -

Money Market Mutual Funds 460,004 460,004 -

Total Investments 26,408,253 1,029,941 25,378,312

Total Cash 253,850,544 253,850,544 -

Total Cash and Investments (1)

280,258,797$ 254,880,485$ 25,378,312$

(1) Total cash and investments include restricted cash.

in Years

Credit Risk

Credit risk is defined as the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. The credit quality of investments is limited by NRS, which authorizes investments in obligations of the U.S. Treasury and agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S., obligations of the State of Nevada and local governments, notes, bonds and other obligations issued by corporations rated “A” or better by one or more nationally recognized bond credit rating agencies, commercial paper rated “A-1”, “P-1” or better, repurchase agreements, certificates of deposit, and money market mutual funds rated “AAA” or its equivalent.

The RTC investment policy does not further limit its investment choices with the exception of investments in notes, bonds and other obligations issued by corporations. Pursuant to the RTC’s formal investment policy, corporate obligations must be rated “AA” or better.

45

Page 63: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE D – CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) Credit Risk (continued)

As of June 30, 2013, the RTC’s investments were rated as follows:

Investment Type Fair Value Moody's Standard & Poor's

U.S. Agency Notes 24,278,054$ AAA AA+

U.S. Treasury 1,100,257 AAA N/A

Corporate Notes 569,937 A1 AA+

Money Market Mutual Funds 460,004 AAA AAA

Total Investments 26,408,253$

Ratings

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is defined as the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. NRS 355.170 and NRS 355.171 limit maturities of authorized investments. The RTC’s formal investment policy does not further limit investment maturities as a means of managing its exposure to fair value losses arising from increasing interest rates. The weighted average years to maturity for all investments at June 30, 2013 are 2.12 years. Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of credit risk is defined as the risk of loss attributed to the magnitude of a government’s investment in a single issuer. The RTC’s formal investment policy requires investment portfolio diversification in order to eliminate the risk of loss from overconcentration. The policy places the statutory limits on investments. Amounts invested in direct obligations of the U.S. government, securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, repurchase agreements or certificates of deposit are not limited. Investment limits per issuer are placed on the following securities: securities backed by federal agencies, 35%; agency issued mortgage-backed securities, 15%; corporate obligations, 4%; obligations issued by state and local governments, 25%. Other limits are placed on the following securities: bankers acceptances, 20% in the aggregate; commercial paper, 20% of portfolio; and money market funds, 45% of money market fund assets. At June 30, 2013, more than 5% of the RTC’s investments were invested in the following:

Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) 31.1% Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB) 27.2%

Freddie MAC Global Notes 23.2% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FMHLMC) 10.4% NOTE E – RESTRICTED CASH AND INVESTMENTS Governmental Funds

The restricted cash and investments balance of $173,042,522 in the General Fund is restricted for street and highway construction pursuant to bond covenants; $39,651,154 in the Debt Service Fund is restricted for required reserves and debt service on the bonds.

46

Page 64: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE F – CAPITAL ASSETS

A summary of activity in capital assets used in the operation of governmental activities for the year ended June 30, 2013, follows:

ADDITIONS

Balance Balance

Governmental Activities June 30, 2012 Additions Deletions June 30, 2013

Capital Assets not being depreciated:

Land $ 1,660,698 $ - $ (786,108) $ 874,590

Construction in progress - 151,563 - 151,563

Total Capital Assets, not being depreciated 1,660,698 151,563 (786,108) 1,026,153

Capital Assets being depreciated:

Revenue & support vehicles 4,659,894 1,653,603 (768,570) 5,544,927

Other equipment 4,093,674 92,434 (266,449) 3,919,659

Buildings and leasehold improvements 7,191,860 - - 7,191,860

Total Capital Assets being depreciated 15,945,428 1,746,037 (1,035,019) 16,656,446

Less accumulated depreciation for:

Revenue & support vehicles (3,878,884) (670,889) 768,570 (3,781,203)

Other equipment (3,866,262) (156,222) 266,449 (3,756,035)

Buildings and leasehold improvements (3,941,779) (321,461) - (4,263,240)

Total accumulated depreciation (11,686,925) (1,148,572) 1,035,019 (11,800,478)

Total Capital Assets being depreciated, net 4,258,503 597,465 - 4,855,968

Governmental activities Capital Assets, net $ 5,919,201 $ 749,028 $ (786,108) $ 5,882,121

47

Page 65: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE F – CAPITAL ASSETS (CONTINUED)

A summary of activity in capital assets used in business-type activities for the year ended June 30, 2013, follows:

Balance Balance

Business-type Activities June 30, 2012 Additions Deletions June 30, 2013

Capital Assets not being depreciated:

Land $ 15,895,709 $ 786,108 $ - $ 16,681,817

Construction in progress 137,872 639,619 (606,247) 171,244

Total Capital Assets, not being depreciated 16,033,581 1,425,727 (606,247) 16,853,061

Capital Assets being depreciated:

Revenue vehicles 36,693,751 5,144,352 (6,002,398) 35,835,705

Tool and shop equipment 344,639 - (6,874) 337,765

Office furniture and equipment 166,634 - (28,117) 138,517

Support vehicles 707,036 - (109,121) 597,915

Revenue collection and counting equipment 1,946,572 - (565,236) 1,381,336

Miscellaneous fixtures and equipment 887,882 - - 887,882

Buildings and leasehold improvements 49,199,830 681,085 (92,359) 49,788,556

Land improvements 602,261 - - 602,261

Communications equipment 299,361 138,421 (5,000) 432,782

Surveillance equipment 1,344,378 - (426,384) 917,994

Passenger shelters 7,498,378 44,239 - 7,542,617

Computer equipment 1,190,115 130,812 (113,574) 1,207,353

Intelligent transportation system 3,066,144 - (3,313) 3,062,831

Total Capital Assets being depreciated 103,946,981 6,138,909 (7,352,376) 102,733,514

Less accumulated depreciation for:

Revenue vehicles (19,749,362) (2,451,518) 6,002,398 (16,198,482)

Tool and shop equipment (298,465) (14,081) 6,874 (305,672)

Office furniture and equipment (166,634) - 28,117 (138,517)

Support vehicles (652,235) (28,600) 109,121 (571,714)

Revenue collection and counting equipment (1,332,186) (221,597) 565,236 (988,547)

Miscellaneous fixtures and equipment (298,414) (192,509) - (490,923)

Buildings and leasehold improvements (12,752,468) (1,771,372) 92,359 (14,431,481)

Land improvements (294,720) (57,643) - (352,363)

Communications equipment (195,884) (28,818) 5,000 (219,702)

Surveillance equipment (1,344,378) - 426,384 (917,994)

Passenger shelters (752,409) (596,390) - (1,348,799)

Computer equipment (981,660) (96,256) 113,574 (964,342)

Intelligent transportation system (3,066,144) - 3,313 (3,062,831)

Total accumulated depreciation (41,884,959) (5,458,784) 7,352,376 (39,991,367)

Total Capital Assets being depreciated, net 62,062,022 680,125 - 62,742,147

Business-type activities Capital Assets, net $ 78,095,603 $ 2,105,852 $ (606,247) $ 79,595,208

48

Page 66: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE F – CAPITAL ASSETS (CONTINUED)

Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the primary government as follows:

Governmental Activities:

Streets and highways $ 19,794

Transportation services 1,120,700

Metropolitan planning 8,078

Total depreciation

expense-governmental

activities $ 1,148,572

Business-type Activities:

Public transportation $ 5,458,784

NOTE G – CONTINGENCIES

Amounts received or receivable from grantor agencies are subject to audit and adjustment by grantor agencies, principally the federal government. Any disallowed claims, including amounts already collected, may constitute a liability of the applicable fund. The amount, if any, of expenditures that may be disallowed by the grantor cannot be determined at this time, although the RTC expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial. The RTC is involved in two legal actions resulting from the operations of the RTC RIDE transit system. The RTC is vigorously contesting these lawsuits. The RTC has estimated its liability (see Note I) under these actions, and accrued liabilities as appropriate based on the advice of its attorneys. The RTC considers it unlikely that the ultimate settlements will result in any additional significant costs to the RTC.

NOTE H – UNEARNED REVENUE

Governmental funds report unearned revenue in connection with receivables for revenues that are not considered to be available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. At the end of the current fiscal year, $12,500 in unearned rental revenue was reported in the Regional Road Impact Fee fund. NOTE I – UNINSURED RISK

The RTC is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; and natural disasters for which the government carries commercial insurance. The RTC is self-insured for municipal liability and business auto liability. The RTC has hired a service agent to administer claims and judgments falling under the self-insurance limit. Liabilities of any fund are reported when it is probable that a loss has occurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Liabilities include an amount for claims that have been incurred but not reported (IBNRs). The result of the process to estimate the claims liability is not an exact amount, as it depends on many factors, such as inflation, changes in legal doctrines and damage awards. Accordingly, claims are reevaluated periodically to consider the effects of inflation, recent claim settlement trends (including frequency and amount of payouts), and other economic and social factors. The estimate of the claims liability also includes amounts for incremental claim adjustment expenses related to specific claims and other claim adjustment expenses regardless of whether allocated to specific claims. All claims are liquidated as they become due and payable using current resources. An excess coverage insurance policy covers individual claims in excess of $500,000. Settlements have not exceeded coverage for each of the past five fiscal years.

49

Page 67: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE I – UNINSURED RISK (CONTINUED)

Changes in the balances of claims liabilities during the past two years are:

2013 2012

Unpaid claims, July 1 297,000$ 1,166,000$

Claims Incurred - -

Payments/adjustments (253,000) (869,000)

Unpaid claims, June 30 44,000$ 297,000$

All insurance settlements are recorded and liquidated in the proprietary fund. Unpaid claims liability is included in accrued liabilities on the statement of net position. The RTC incurred no liability claims in FY 2013. Effective, July 1, 2011, RTC and MV Transportation, Inc. entered into a turnkey contract in which the latter assumes all legal and insurance settlement risks arising from operating the fixed-route transit system. As of June 30, 2013, only two claims remain outstanding to which RTC still has some insurance settlement risk.

NOTE J – LONG TERM OBLIGATIONS

Line of Credit

The RTC entered into a general obligation revolving line of credit promissory note, series 2006, dated July 25, 2006, with Wells Fargo Bank for the purpose of financing the costs of street and highway construction and mass transportation capital improvements. The line was secured by a pledge of fuel tax revenues. Under the terms of the promissory note, the RTC can borrow up to $50,000,000 aggregate maximum principal amount at an interest rate of 75% of the bank’s prime lending rate, but in no event shall the interest rate be greater than 3% of the “Index of Twenty Bonds” most recently published in The Bond Buyer. The RTC can have no more than $7,500,000 outstanding at any time during the term of the promissory note. All advances under the promissory note mature (“Required Principal Reduction Date”) 30 days prior to the second, fourth, sixth, and eighth anniversary dates of the note (“Bi-annual Anniversary Date”). The agreement terminates on July 25, 2016. There was no outstanding balance for this line of credit during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. Revenue Bonds

The RTC issued revenue bonds to provide funds for the construction and pavement maintenance of certain streets and highways in the County. The bond Series 2009, Series 2010ABC, Series 2010DEF and Series 2013 constitute special, limited obligations of Washoe County, payable solely from and secured by an irrevocable pledge of the Net Pledged Revenues, derived primarily from certain taxes on motor vehicle fuel collected by the RTC. The bond Series 2010H constitutes special, limited obligations of Washoe County, payable solely from and secured by an irrevocable pledge of the Net Pledged Revenues, derived primarily from one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) sales tax collected by the RTC. The bonds shall not be considered or held to be a general obligation of the County or RTC. Owners of the bonds may not look to any other funds or account other than those specifically pledged to the payment of the bonds.

50

Page 68: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE J – LONG TERM OBLIGATIONS (CONTINUED)

Bonds outstanding at June 30, 2013 are as follows:

Date of Issue

Original

Issue

Interest Rates

to Maturity Final Maturity

Principal

Outstanding

July 1, 2013

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Series 2009(1)

7/8/2009 89,567,000$ 3.0 - 5.5 % 2/1/2028 82,091,000$

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Series 2010A(1)

3/17/2010 13,179,000 2.5 - 4.0 2/1/2020 13,179,000

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Series 2010B(2)

3/17/2010 66,821,000 5.6 - 7.2 2/1/2039 66,821,000

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Series 2010C(3)

3/17/2010 10,000,000 7.2 2/1/2040 10,000,000

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Series 2010D(1)

12/16/2010 5,840,000 3.0 - 5.0 2/1/2014 2,090,000

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Series 2010E(2)

12/16/2010 58,775,000 7.969 2/1/2040 58,775,000

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Series 2010F(3)

12/16/2010 5,385,000 7.875 2/1/2040 5,385,000

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Series 2013(1)

4/16/2013 165,000,000 5.0 2/1/2043 165,000,000

Sales Tax Improvement Bonds Series 2010H(2)

12/16/2010 20,000,000 7.451 2/1/2040 20,000,000

434,567,000$ 423,341,000$

(1) Tax Exempt Bond

(2) Taxable Direct Pay Build America Bond (BAB) providing federally refundable interest credits

(3) Taxable Recovery Zone Economic Development Bond (RZEDB) providing federally refundable interest credits

The debt service on bond Series 2009, 2010A, and 2013 will be payable from net pledge revenues. The debt service on bond Series 2010B, 2010C, 2010E, 2010F, and 2010H will be payable from net pledged revenues and BAB and RZED interest credits to the extent that any such credits are actually received by the RTC.

Net pledged motor vehicle fuel tax revenues for the fiscal year on Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax bonds totaled $41,827,886 with principal and interest paid for the bonds totaled $18,284,722. Total principal and interest remaining to be paid on all motor vehicle fuel tax bonds before BAB and RZEDB credits is $858,266,239 payable through 2043. Pledged sales tax revenue for the fiscal year on the Series 2010H bonds totaled $7,128,638. Total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the Series 2010H bond before BAB interest credits, is $52,874,185 payable through 2040. Net Other Postemployment Benefits Obligation

In accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45, the RTC provides other postemployment benefits (OPEB) for eligible employees through the retiree health benefits program. At June 30, 2013, the net other postemployment benefit liability for the RTC was $2,093,368, as detailed in Note R. Currently, the RTC finances their liability on the pay-as-you-go basis. Compensated Absences

The liability for compensated absences is included in noncurrent liabilities on the government-wide Statement of Net Position. The governmental activities liability for compensated absences is for RTC employee benefits which are paid from the General Fund. No employee benefits are accounted for in the business-type activities; therefore, no compensated absences liability is reported.

51

Page 69: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE J – LONG TERM OBLIGATIONS (CONTINUED)

Changes in long-term liabilities

Changes in long-term liabilities for the year ended June 30, 2013, was as follows:

Balance

July 1, 2012 Additions

Balance

June 30, 2013

Due Within

One Year

GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES

Revenue Bonds

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Bonds 244,129,000$ 165,000,000$ $ 5,788,000)( 403,341,000$ 5,997,000$

Sales Tax Improvement Bonds 20,000,000 - - 20,000,000 -

Total Revenue Bonds 264,129,000 165,000,000 5,788,000)( 423,341,000 5,997,000

Less Deferred amounts

Bond Premium 308,060 11,022,903 194,268)( 11,136,695 442,564

Bond Discount 119,197)( 15,707 - 103,490)( 15,707)(

Total Deferred Amounts 188,863 11,038,610 194,268)( 11,033,205 426,857

Other Liabilities

Compensated absences 919,760 555,566 510,648)( 964,678 463,579

Total Other Liabilities 919,760 555,566 510,648)( 964,678 463,579

Total Governmental Activities 265,237,623 176,594,176 6,492,916)( 435,338,883 6,887,436

Total Long-Term Obligations 265,237,623$ 176,594,176$ $ 6,492,916)( 435,338,883$ 6,887,436$

Reductions

Long term liabilities are liquidated from the General Fund for governmental activities. NOTE K – DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

Revenue bond debt service requirements to maturity are as follows:

Year Ending

June 30, Principal(1)

Interest(2)

Total

2014 5,997,000$ 23,115,700$ 29,112,700$

2015 6,096,000 24,573,670 30,669,670

2016 6,309,000 24,360,310 30,669,310

2017 6,604,000 24,065,391 30,669,391

2018 7,603,000 23,800,808 31,403,808

2019-2023 43,414,000 113,465,649 156,879,649

2024-2028 54,722,000 100,845,363 155,567,363

2029-2033 76,995,000 81,357,529 158,352,529

2034-2038 98,078,000 53,232,081 151,310,081

2039-2043 117,523,000 18,982,923 136,505,923

423,341,000$ 487,799,424$ 911,140,424$

(1) Principal amounts exclude discounts and premiums

(2) Interest amounts exclude Build America Bond (BAB) and Recovery Zone Economic

Development Bond (RZEDB) credits.

52

Page 70: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE L – INTERFUND ACCOUNT BALANCES AND TRANSFERS

Interfund account balances are a result of the timing differences between the dates that interfund goods and services are provided or reimbursable expenditures occur, and transfers between funds are made. Interfund account balances at June 30, 2013 are summarized as follows:

General

Fund

Regional Road

Impact Fee

Fund

Paratransit

Fund

Nonmajor

Governmental

Funds

Proprietary

Fund Total

Due To:

General Fund -$ 236,229$ 192,271$ 422,654$ 1,569,537$ 2,420,691$

Regional Road

Impact Fee Fund 2,000 - - - - 2,000

Paratransit Fund - - - - - -

Governmental Funds 2,000 236,229 192,271 422,654 1,569,537 2,422,691

Proprietary Fund 44,964 7,500 - 11,115 - 63,579

46,964$ 243,729$ 192,271$ 433,769$ 1,569,537$ 2,486,270$

Due From

Transfers are used to (1) move revenues from the fund that statute or budget requires collect them to the funds that statute or budget requires expend them, (2) move receipts restricted to debt service from the funds collecting the receipts to the Debt Service Fund as debt service payments become due, and (3) use restricted revenues held in the General Fund to finance street and highway expenditures in the Regional Road Impact Fee Fund in accordance with bond ordinances. Interfund transfer balances at June 30, 2013 were as follows:

Transfers from: Transfers to: Amount

General Fund Regional Road Impact Fee Fund 50,872,068$

Debt Service Fund 24,644,879

Nonmajor Governmental Funds 1,275,000

Subtotal 76,791,947

Public Transit Fund Nonmajor Governmental Funds 225,000

Total Transfers In / Out 77,016,947$

Interfund transfers for the year ended June 30, 2013

53

Page 71: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE M – INVESTMENT INCOME

Investment income consists of the following as of June 30, 2013:

Governmental Activities

Interest income 1,057,361$

Net decrease in the fair value

of investments (767,857)

Realized loss (82,262)

207,242$

Business-type Activities

Interest income 204,987$

Net decrease in the fair value

of investments (145,949)

Realized loss (23,987)

35,051$

The calculation of realized gain is independent of the calculation of the net change in the fair value of investments. Realized gains on investments held more than one fiscal year, which were sold in the current year, have been included as a change in the fair value of investments as reported in prior years and the current year.

NOTE N – LEASE INCOME

The Proprietary Fund owns a building located on Terminal Way in Reno, Nevada. The acquisition cost and subsequent improvements of the building and land are $5,800,809 as of June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, accumulated depreciation of the building was $2,697,071. Building space is leased to various companies. Eventually, the RTC plans to fully occupy the building. Future minimum lease receipts are as follows:

Year ending June 30,

2014 $ 119,535 2015 23,604 2016 23,604 2017 16,368

$ 183,111 In addition, building space is leased to the General Fund and Special Revenue Funds on a month-to-month basis. Rental income for the year ended June 30, 2013, was $455,517 of which $179,856 was received from the General Fund, and $74,460 was received from the Special Revenue Funds. RTC earned additional rental income from Centennial Plaza and 4

th Street Station transit centers in the amount of $4,020

and $225 respectively.

54

Page 72: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE N – LEASE INCOME (CONTINUED)

In December 2012, the RTC entered into a license agreement with Megabus to allow the use of the Centennial Plaza property for passenger waiting, boarding and alighting for their service between Reno and San Francisco. Rental income of $4,020 was received in fiscal year 2013. Kiosk spaces in the 4

th Street Transit Center in Reno remain unoccupied following two unsuccessful leases which were

terminated due to delinquency by both tenants. A total of $8,680 rent receivable was written off this fiscal year and a $225 security deposit was applied to unpaid rent. Lease income of $15,000 was received from Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. for a billboard acquired through property acquisition for the Moana Lane widening project which was paid for by Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Bond funds. Lease income of $2,000 was received for a property acquired through right of way acquisition for the Pyramid/McCarran Intersection project. The property will eventually be demolished to complete the project but until that time, RTC is leasing it back to the original owners. NOTE O – RETIREMENT PROGRAMS

The RTC contributes to the following retirement programs: State of Nevada Public Employees’ Retirement System

Plan Description The RTC contributes to the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS), a cost-sharing, multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the State of Nevada. PERS provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. Chapter 286 of the Nevada Revised Statutes establishes the benefit provisions provided to the participants of PERS. These benefit provisions may only be amended through legislation. The Public Employees’ Retirement System of the State of Nevada issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for PERS. That report may be obtained by writing to the Public Employees’ Retirement System of Nevada, 693 West Nye Lane, Carson City, Nevada 89703 or by calling (775) 687-4200. Funding Policy Plan members are funded under the employer pay contribution plan, wherein the RTC is required to contribute all amounts due under the plan. The contribution requirements of plan members and the RTC are established by Chapter 286 of the Nevada Revised Statues. The current rate is 23.75% of annual covered payroll. The RTC contributes 100% of the required annual contribution. The following are the rates and amounts contributed for the last three years:

Year ending June 30, Contribution Required Employers Contribution Rate 2013 $ 1,213,988 23.75%

2012 1,250,739 23.75% 2011 1,277,331 21.50%

RTC – Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan

The RTC offers a non-qualified deferred compensation plan to its employees under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 457. The plan is offered to all RTC employees and permits them to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The accumulated amount of each employee’s deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death or unforeseeable emergency. All assets and income of the plan are held in trust for the exclusive benefit

55

Page 73: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE O – RETIREMENT PROGRAMS (CONTINUED)

RTC – Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan (continued)

benefit of the participants and their beneficiaries and are administered by an independent plan administrator. The RTC does not have fiduciary accountability for the plan. The RTC elects to contribute to each non-bargaining unit employee’s benefit of the participants and their beneficiaries, and are administered by an independent plan administrator. The RTC deferred compensation plan, as matching funds, up to 1% of each employee’s annual base salary. For bargaining unit employees hired prior to January 1, 2013, the RTC also contributes up to 1% of each bargaining unit employee’s annual base salary. For bargaining unit employees hired on or after January 1, 2013, the RTC contributes up to ½% of the bargaining unit employee’s annual base salary. The RTC also matches 5% of the Executive Director’s salary. Total contributions to the plan for the year ended June 30, 2013 were $43,383. RTC – 401(a) Plan

On December 17, 2004, the RTC established a 401(a) Money Purchase Retirement Plan through ICMA Retirement Corporation. The ICMA Retirement Corporation Governmental Money Purchase Plan & Trust was established for the exclusive benefit of eligible employees and their beneficiaries under Section 401(a) of the IRC. The plan year coincides with the calendar year. All employees whose positions are covered by PERS are eligible to participate. The Plan is voluntary and there are no mandatory contributions from employees or the RTC. Contributions are limited to less than 25% of compensation, and compensation has been defined to include overtime and bonuses. The decision to participate is a one-time irrevocable decision. Loans are not permitted under the plan. In 2009, the IRS ruled that annual open enrollment periods for 401(a) plans would no longer be allowed. New plan enrollments are only allowed for new hires within the first sixty days of employment.

RTC – Retirement Health Savings Plans

On December 17, 2004, the RTC established a Retirement Health Savings Plan (RHS Plan). The RHS was funded through voluntary employee contributions. The assets of the Plan are held in trust for the exclusive benefit of the Plan participants and their beneficiaries, with the ICMA Retirement Corporation serving as the trustee. Once an employee participates in the Plan, the election to contribute is irrevocable. The participant is eligible to receive benefits upon separation from service.

In 2007, the IRS ruled that the elective features of the types of plans like the RHS Plan would not be permitted after December 31, 2007. Although the ICMA and IRS reached a settlement preserving the existing favorable tax treatment of participants already in the RHS Plan, no new participants can join the plan and no further contributions can be made to the Plan by existing participants.

56

Page 74: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE P – GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES

Changes in Project Appropriations

The amounts for project appropriations represent construction planning commitments as permitted by state statute.

The changes in the amounts for project appropriations in the General Fund (Regional Streets and Highways) during the year ended June 30, 2013 were as follows:

Balance at July 1, 2012 34,440,666$

Project appropriations 30,807,016

Expenditures (19,878,069)

Net project adjustments (7,718,266)

Total balance for project

appropriations at June 30, 2013 37,651,347$

The total balance for project appropriations is less than the available restricted fund balance for street and highway construction in the General Fund by $178,059,797. The restricted fund balance surplus is derived from the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Bonds issued to finance the costs of constructing and maintaining certain streets into the future. The surplus will be transferred as needed to fund a portion of the project appropriations shortfall for street and highway construction in the Regional Road Impact Fee Program, as discussed below.

The changes in the amounts for project appropriations of the Special Revenue Fund (Regional Road Impact Fee) during the year ended June 30, 2013 were as follows:

Balance at July 1, 2012 151,221,873$

Project appropriations 93,988,124

Expenditures (58,274,097)

Net project adjustments (48,039,953)

Total balance for project

appropriations at June 30, 2013 138,895,947$

The total balance for project appropriations exceeds the available restricted fund balance for street and highway construction in the Regional Road Impact Fee Fund by $135,947,537. Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Bonds proceeds recorded in the General Fund as “Restricted for street and highway construction” will be used to finance this deficit. NOTE Q – NET POSITION

The government-wide statement of net position, governmental activities, reports $219,944,850 of restricted net position which is restricted by terms of grants and by enabling legislation for street and highway construction. Another $39,739,559 is subject to restrictions by the terms of bond covenants for future debt service requirements of principal and interest. Unrestricted net position is $(439,896,385), and total net position is $(174,329,855). The negative balances are the result of bonds issued during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, June 30, 2011, and June 30, 2013 totaling $434,567,000 in the aggregate. Proceeds of the bonds have been used to fund various streets and highways projects.

57

Page 75: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE Q – NET POSITION (CONTINUED)

One of the purposes of the RTC is to build and maintain streets and highways, which are then dedicated to Reno, Sparks, and Washoe County. As a result the RTC carries a large debt burden with no offsetting asset. The debt will be paid through pledged motor vehicle fuel and sales taxes projected to be collected over the next 30 years. Management believes that the RTC will have sufficient cash flow to service the debt. NOTE R – POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS

In addition to the pension benefits described in Note O, the RTC provides other postemployment health benefits (OPEB) for eligible retirees and participates in the State of Nevada’s Public Employee Benefit Plan (PEBP), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit OPEB plan. RTC Retiree Health Benefit Program (RTC RHBP)

Plan Description In accordance with NRS 287.010, the RTC Commission established and administers a retiree health insurance plan through the RTC Personnel Rules to provide postemployment benefits to eligible employees upon retirement. Retirees are offered medical, vision, and life insurance coverage through a single-employer defined benefit plan. As of June 30, 2013, all employees hired before June 1, 2013 who retire from the RTC and meet the requirements for retirement under the Public Employees Retirement System of Nevada (PERS) are eligible to participate. The plan benefit formula is based on years of service and retirees can choose from a self-funded group health plan or an HMO. The plan does not issue a separate financial report.

Funding Policy The contribution requirements and benefits of the RTC are established and may be amended by the RTC Commission through the RTC Personnel Rules. The RTC contributes 50% of the health benefit premium for retirees with at least 10 years of service, 75% with 15 years, and 100% with 20 years or more. The benefit is reduced by 50% for part-time employees achieving the required milestones. Benefits are paid on a pay-as-you-go basis. State of Nevada’s Public Employee Benefit Plan (PEBP)

Plan Description NRS 287.023 allowed retired employees of governmental entities within the State of Nevada to join the State’s Public Employee Benefit Program (PEBP), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit OPEB plan administered by a nine member governing board. PEBP provided medical, prescription, vision, life and accident insurance, and dental for retirees. The Plan is not accounted for as a trust fund, as an irrevocable trust has not been established to account for the Plan and no financial reports are issued. Eligibility, benefit provisions, and subsidy requirements are governed by statutes of the State of Nevada and can only be amended through legislation. The statutes were revised effective November 30, 2008, to create new participation limitations so that only active members of PEBP can elect coverage after retirement. Based on the statute revision, former RTC employees and retirees must have retired and joined PEBP by September 1, 2008 to elect PEBP membership. Consequently, no employees retiring from the RTC on or after September 1, 2008 were eligible to participate in the PEBP plan as a retiree at the RTC’s expense.

58

Page 76: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE R – POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS (CONTINUED)

Funding Policy The RTC is required to provide a subsidy for their retirees that have elected to join PEBP. The subsidy is paid on the pay-as-you-go basis. Contribution requirements for plan members and the participating employers are assessed by the PEBP Board annually. Unsubsidized non-state retiree plan rates in effect for the fiscal year ranged from $602 to $836 per month. The contributions required for PEBP subsidies depend on the date of retirement or prior years of Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) service former employees earned while working for the RTC. The subsidy depends on years of service and ranges from a minimum of $118 for 5 years of service to a maximum of $650 for 20 or more years of service. These subsidies are then allocated and billed to all applicable former employers of the retiree. RTC’s portion of the monthly subsidies ranged from less than $1 to $179 during the 2013 fiscal year. Subsidies for retiree premiums are required to be paid directly to the State when due. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation

An actuarial valuation performed for the retiree health benefit plan as of July 1, 2010 was used to determine the annual required contribution (ARC) for both the RTC and PEBP plans for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal cost each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities over a period not to exceed thirty years. The plans are funded on a pay-as-you-go basis with zero percent funding for the plan. For fiscal year 2013, the RTC’s cost of the RTC plan was $105,794 for 20 eligible retirees. The RTC’s cost of the PEBP plan was $3,557 for 6 eligible retirees.

The annual OPEB cost and related information for each plan for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 are as follows:

RTC Plan PEBP

Determination of Annual Required Contribution:

Normal cost 281,000$ -$

Amortization of Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) 168,000 3,900

Annual Required Contribution (ARC) 449,000$ 3,900$

Determination of Net OPEB Obligation:

Annual Required Contribution 449,000$ 3,900$

Interest on Net OPEB Obligation 86,850 50

Adjustment to ARC (75,103) (45)

Annual OPEB Cost 460,747 3,905

Retiree Benefit Payments Paid by RTC (105,794) (3,557)

Increase in Net OPEB Obligation 354,953 348

Net OPEB Obligation Beginning of Year 1,737,008 1,059

Net OPEB Obligation End of Year 2,091,961$ 1,407$

59

Page 77: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE R – POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS (CONTINUED) Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation (continued)

The RTC’s annual OPEB cost, the amount and percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for 2013, and the two preceding years were as follows:

Plan

Fiscal

Year Ended

June 30,

Percentage

of Annual

OPEB Cost

Contributed

RTC 2011 $ 596,692 $ 80,157 13.43% $ (1,328,380)

2012 507,322 98,694 19.45% (1,737,008)

2013 460,747 105,794 22.96% (2,091,961)

PEBP 2011 3,903 3,727 95.49% (445)

2012 3,902 3,288 84.26% (1,059)

2013 3,905 3,557 91.09% (1,407)

Net OPEB

Obligation

Employer

Contribution

Annual OPEB

Cost

Funding Status and Funding Progress:

The funded status for each plan for the most recent valuation date follows:

RTC Plan PEBP

Valuation Date 7/1/2010 7/1/2010

Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) 5,436,000$ 94,300$

Actuarial Value of Plan Assets - -

Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) 5,436,000$ 94,300$

Funded Ratio (Actual Value of Plan Assets/AAL) 0.00% 0.00%

Covered Payroll (Active Plan Members as of June 30, 2013) 5,309,000$ n/a

UAAL as a Percentage of Covered Payroll 102.39% n/a

Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and the annual required contributions of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, will present multiyear trend information as it becomes available. The schedule will show whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits.

60

Page 78: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE R – POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS (CONTINUED)

Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations. The ARC for the plan was determined as part of the July 1, 2010 actuarial valuation using the following methods and assumptions:

RTC Plan PEBP

Actuarial cost method projected unit credit projected unit credit

Amortization method level percentage of payroll, open level percentage of payroll, closed

Remaining amortization period 26 years 26 years

Inflation rate 4.00% 4.00%

Investment return 5.00% 5.00%

Projected salary increases 4.00% 4.00%

Healthcare cost trend 8.50% initial 8.50% initial

4.75% ultimate 4.75% ultimate

NOTE S – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

The RTC provides administrative support to the non-profit organization CitiCare. CitiCare’s mission is to seek additional funding sources to bridge the gap for people with mental and physical handicaps and senior citizens between their transportation needs and the resources currently available for transportation. RTC provided approximately $49,327 in services to CitiCare during the year ended June 30, 2013.

CitiCare paid $192,522 to the RTC to provide rides to seniors and the disabled. NOTE T – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The RTC Intersection Improvements Project at State Route 445 (Pyramid Highway) and Eagle Canyon/La Posada Drives included improvements that were mutually beneficial to the motoring public and to adjacent private developments. On November 1, 2007, the managing partner of Eagle Landing LLC, entered into an agreement to reimburse the RTC $248,227 for certain improvements including a roundabout, sidewalk and median. Reimbursement payments were made totaling $180,000. Due to the economic downturn, the LLC was subsequently disbanded and payments ceased, leaving a balance of $68,227. The managing partner, individually, has maintained contact with the RTC in the intervening years concerning the balance and negotiations were conducted in consultation with the RTC Legal Counsel in an effort to bring closure to this matter. On August 23, 2013 the RTC Board of Commissioners approved a settlement of the remaining debt in the amount of $10,000.

61

Page 79: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION

Page 80: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

SCHEDULES OF FUNDING PROGRESS - OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS

RTC Retiree Health Benefit Program (1)

(a) (b) (a/b) (b-a) (c) [(b-a)/c]

Actuarial

Valuation Date

Actuarial Value

of Assets

Actuarial

Accrued

Liability (AAL) Funded Ratio

Unfunded

Actuarial

Accrued

Liability

(UAAL)

Covered

Payroll

UAAL as a

Percent of

Covered

Payroll

January 1, 2008 -$ 3,554,000$ 0.00% 3,554,000$ 7,691,000$ 46.21%

July 1, 2010 - 5,436,000 0.00% 5,436,000 5,309,000 102.39%

State of Nevada's Public Employee Benefit Plan (PEBP) (1)/(2)

(a) (b) (a/b) (b-a) (c) [(b-a)/c]

Actuarial

Valuation Date

Actuarial Value

of Assets

Actuarial

Accrued

Liability (AAL) Funded Ratio

Unfunded

Actuarial

Accrued

Liability

(UAAL)

Covered

Payroll

UAAL as a

Percent of

Covered

Payroll

January 1, 2008 -$ 95,200$ 0.00% 95,200$ N/A N/A

July 1, 2010 - 94,300 0.00% 94,300 N/A N/A

(1) The RTC implemented GASB Statement No. 45 prospectively for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Additional

multi-year data will be provided as it becomes available.

(2) Effective November 30, 2008, the State's PEBP plan was closed to any new retirees.

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

June 30, 2013

63

Page 81: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

INDIVIDUAL FUND

STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

Page 82: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

NONMAJOR

GOVERNMENTAL FUND

Metropolitan Planning Organization Fund

This fund is used to account for:

• Resources provided for transportation planning.

Page 83: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Assets

Cash in custody of County Treasurer 208,515$

Cash in bank and on hand 984,592

Due from federal government 409,513

Interest receivable 270

Prepaids 47,157

Total assets 1,650,047

Liabilities

Accounts payable 114,386

Due to other funds 433,769

Total liabilities 548,155

Deferred Inflows of Resources

Unavailable revenue - federal grants 409,513

Total deferred inflows of resources 409,513

Fund balance

Nonspendable:

Prepaids 47,157

Assigned:

Subsequent year's budget: appropriation of fund balance 645,222

Total fund balance 692,379

Total liabilities and fund balance 1,650,047$

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUND

June 30, 2013

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

BALANCE SHEET

66

Page 84: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Actual

Original Final Amounts Variance

Revenues

Regional transportation planning and

capital grants:

State of Nevada - Department of

Transportation 50,000$ 50,000$ 189,464$ $ 139,464

Federal Transit Administration 300,000 300,000 172,869 (127,131)

Federal Highway Administration 2,225,000 2,225,000 917,097 (1,307,903)

Investment income 15,000 15,000 2,864 (12,136)

Miscellaneous 500 500 - (500)

Total revenues 2,590,500 2,590,500 1,282,294 (1,308,206)

Expenditures

Current:

Metropolitan planning 4,113,418 4,113,418 2,724,776 1,388,642

Total expenditures 4,113,418 4,113,418 2,724,776 1,388,642

Deficiency of revenues under

expenditures (1,522,918) (1,522,918) (1,442,482) 80,436

Other financing sources

Transfers in 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 -

Total other financing sources 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 -

Net change in fund balance (22,918) (22,918) 57,518 80,436

Fund balance - beginning 352,819 352,819 634,861 282,042

Fund balance - ending 329,901$ 329,901$ 692,379$ $ 362,478

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

Regional Transportation Commission

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

Budgeted Amounts

(Metropolitan Planning Organization Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

67

Page 85: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

CAPITAL ASSETS

USED IN THE OPERATION OF

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

Page 86: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Governmental funds capital assets

Land 874,590$ Buildings and leasehold improvements 7,191,860 Revenue vehicles 5,544,927 Other equipment 3,919,659 Construction in progress 151,563

Total governmental funds capital assets 17,682,599$

Investments in governmental capital assets

by source

General fund 861,830$ Special revenue funds 16,820,769

Total governmental funds capital assets 17,682,599$

June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

CAPITAL ASSETS USED IN THE OPERATION OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

SCHEDULE BY SOURCES

69

Page 87: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Buildings and

Leasehold Revenue Other Construction

Function and Activity Land Improvements Vehicles Equipment in Progress Total

General government -$ 51,884$ -$ 658,383$ 151,563$ 861,830$ Metropolitan planning - - - 211,736 - 211,736 Transportation services 874,590 7,139,976 5,544,927 3,049,540 - 16,609,033

Total governmentalfunds capital assets 874,590$ 7,191,860$ 5,544,927$ 3,919,659$ 151,563$ 17,682,599$

SCHEDULE BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY

June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

CAPITAL ASSETS USED IN THE OPERATION OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

70

Page 88: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Governmental Governmental

Funds Funds

Capital Assets Capital Assets

Function and Activity July 1, 2012 Additions June 30, 2013

General government 781,424$ 206,163$ $ (125,757) 861,830$ Metropolitan planning 301,233 - (89,497) 211,736 Transportation services 16,523,469 1,691,437 (1,605,873) 16,609,033

Total governmentalfunds capital assets 17,606,126$ 1,897,600$ $ (1,821,127) 17,682,599$

Deletions

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES BY FUNCTION AND ACTIVITY

Year ended June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

CAPITAL ASSETS USED IN THE OPERATION OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

71

Page 89: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

OTHER

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 90: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Labor $ 1,644,215 $ 1,399,019 $ (245,196) $ 1,804,487

Fringe 593,122 1,190,084 596,962 627,535

Services 1,150,956 1,621,221 470,265 380,729

Materials and supplies 58,438 77,465 19,027 66,654

Utilities 20,866 22,380 1,514 21,685

Insurance costs 25,989 20,496 (5,493) 17,797

Miscellaneous expense 229,563 292,845 63,282 215,549

Street and highway projects 19,878,069 34,114,000 14,235,931 27,214,151

Total current expenditures $ 23,601,218 $ 38,737,510 $ 15,136,292 $ 30,348,587

Actual

Amounts

Final Variance to

Amounts

Actual

Budget Final Budget

Year ended June 30, 2013

With comparative actual amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

GENERAL FUND

(Regional Street and Highway Fund)

2012

73

Page 91: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2012

Actual Final Actual

Amounts Budget Amounts

Principal 5,788,000$ 5,788,000$ $ - 5,438,000$

Interest 12,496,722 12,496,721 (1) 13,222,764

Debt service fees and other fiscal charges 36,617 43,916 7,299 21,874

Total current expenditures 18,321,339$ 18,328,637$ $ 7,298 18,682,638$

Variance to

Final Budget

Year ended June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

DEBT SERVICE

With comparative actual amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

74

Page 92: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2012

Actual Final Actual

Amounts Budget Amounts

Labor 694,250$ 679,449$ $ (14,801) 617,908$

Fringe 249,990 237,319 (12,671) 212,112

Services 311,630 352,876 41,246 288,639

Materials and supplies 35,976 28,912 (7,064) 23,569

Utilities 8,799 7,814 (985) 7,330

Casualty/liability insurance 14,966 20,496 5,530 17,797

Miscellaneous expense 98,879 116,121 17,242 91,082

Street and highway projects 58,274,097 90,260,931 31,986,834 53,579,520

Street and highway impact fee credits 7,470,788 28,800,000 21,329,212 346,025

Total current expenditures 67,159,375$ 120,503,918$ $ 53,344,543 55,183,982$

Final Budget

With comparative actual amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

SCHEDULE OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

Regional Transportation Commission

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

(Regional Road Impact Fee Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

Variance to

75

Page 93: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2012

Actual Final Actual

Amounts Budget Amounts

Labor 297,516$ 328,501$ $ 30,985 312,637$

Fringe 102,631 88,971 (13,660) 105,753

Services 539,372 705,392 166,020 499,061

Materials and supplies 193,593 282,382 88,789 222,371

Utilities 63,580 78,467 14,887 55,909

Casualty/liability insurance 279,710 273,401 (6,309) 266,339

Miscellaneous expense 215,343 306,430 91,087 228,323

Purchased transportation services 4,554,952 4,491,769 (63,183) 4,254,889

Total current expenditures 6,246,697$ 6,555,313$ $ 308,616 5,945,282$

Variance to

Final Budget

Year ended June 30, 2013

With comparative actual amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

(Paratransit Services Fund)

76

Page 94: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2012

Actual Final Actual

Amounts Budget Amounts

Labor 1,044,051$ 1,360,835$ $ 316,784 1,196,276$

Fringe 383,032 450,227 67,195 427,661

Services 1,052,879 2,030,342 977,463 1,464,880

Materials and supplies 42,361 52,424 10,063 65,653

Utilities 13,482 14,843 1,361 22,717

Casualty/liability insurance 20,023 20,496 473 17,797

Miscellaneous expense 168,948 184,251 15,303 161,550

Total current expenditures 2,724,776$ 4,113,418$ $ 1,388,642 3,356,534$

Variance to

Final Budget

With comparative actual amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

(Metropolitan Planning Organization Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

77

Page 95: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Original Final

Revenues

Investment income $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 142,878 $ (357,122)

Total revenues 500,000 500,000 142,878 (357,122)

Expenditures

Debt service:

Principal 5,788,000 5,788,000 5,788,000 -

Interest 12,496,721 12,496,721 12,496,722 (1)

Debt service fees and other fiscal charges 43,916 43,916 36,617 7,299

Total expenditures 18,328,637 18,328,637 18,321,339 7,298

Deficiency of revenues under

expenditures (17,828,637) (17,828,637) (18,178,461) (349,824)

Other financing sources

Transfers in 19,565,300 19,565,300 24,644,879 5,079,579

Total other financing sources 19,565,300 19,565,300 24,644,879 5,079,579

BALANCENet changes in fund balance 1,736,663 1,736,663 6,466,418 4,729,755

Fund balance - beginning 33,202,180 33,202,180 33,273,141 70,961

Fund balance - ending $ 34,938,843 $ 34,938,843 $ 39,739,559 $ 4,800,716

Amounts Final Budget

Year ended June 30, 2013

Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance to

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES

AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

DEBT SERVICE FUND

78

Page 96: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Operating revenues

Passenger fares $ 6,109,557 $ 5,959,133 $ (150,424) $ 5,916,656

Bus advertising 350,000 277,131 (72,869) 347,714

Rental income 475,000 459,762 (15,238) 434,235

Miscellaneous 85,000 14,550 (70,450) 29,669

Total operating revenues 7,019,557 6,710,576 (308,981) 6,728,274

Operating expenses

General administration 26,360,813 24,651,153 1,709,660 24,817,741

Depreciation 5,640,552 5,458,784 181,768 4,943,754

Total operating expenses 32,001,365 30,109,937 1,891,428 29,761,495

Operating loss (24,981,808) (23,399,361) 1,582,447 (23,033,221)

Nonoperating revenues

Operating subsidies:

Federal government grant 8,593,871 3,989,322 (4,604,549) 3,482,964

State grants 407,048 - (407,048) -

Other revenue:

Public transportation tax 12,979,661 12,926,595 (53,066) 12,472,313

Investment income 400,000 35,051 (364,949) 320,859

Gain on sales of capital assets 40,000 38,349 (1,651) 2,930

Total nonoperating revenues 22,420,580 16,989,317 (5,431,263) 16,279,066

Income (loss) before capital

contributions and transfers (2,561,228) (6,410,044) (3,848,816) (6,754,155)

Capital contributions

Federal grants 6,809,482 5,462,720 (1,346,762) 4,579,825

State grants 337,500 - (337,500) -

Capital contributions from others - 786,108 786,108 -

Total capital contributions 7,146,982 6,248,828 (898,154) 4,579,825

Transfers

Transfers out (225,000) (225,000) - (337,500)

Total transfers (225,000) (225,000) - (337,500)

CHANGE IN NET POSITION $ 4,360,754 $ (386,216) $ (4,746,970) $ (2,511,830)

AmountsBudget Amounts Final Budget

Final ActualActual Variance to

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION

PROPRIETARY FUND

BUDGET AND ACTUAL

(Public Transit Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

With comparative actual amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

2013 2012

79

Page 97: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2012

Actual Final Actual

Amounts Budget Amounts

Labor 1,677,028$ 1,835,377$ $ 158,349 1,805,291$

Fringe 751,791 705,340 (46,451) 795,314

Services 2,393,617 2,777,517 383,900 2,529,546

Materials and supplies 2,945,214 3,690,973 745,759 2,928,160

Utilities 180,205 274,961 94,756 191,389

Casualty/liability insurance 225,948 299,647 73,699 90,496-

Miscellaneous expenses 343,015 399,165 56,150 268,584

Purchased transportation services 16,134,335 16,377,833 243,498 16,389,953

Operating expenses before

depreciation and amortization 24,651,153 26,360,813 1,709,660 24,817,741

Depreciation and amortization 5,458,784 5,640,552 181,768 4,943,754

Total operating expenses 30,109,937$ 32,001,365$ $ 1,891,428 29,761,495$

Final Budget

Variance to

Year ended June 30, 2013

With comparative actual amounts for the year ended June 30, 2012

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF EXPENSES BY OBJECT CLASSES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL

PROPRIETARY FUND

(Public Transit Fund)

80

Page 98: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

RTC RTC RTC RTC Local

Date Collected Special Motor Special Motor Special Motor Special Motor Regular Motor

by State of Vehicle Fuel Vehicle Fuel Vehicle Fuel Vehicle Fuel Vehicle Fuel

Nevada Tax - 4¢ Tax - 5¢ Tax - CPI Index(1)

Tax - PPI Index(2)

Tax - 5.35¢

July 2012 562,243$ 715,581$ 220,627$ 2,195,269$ 652,688$

August 2012 590,403 751,423 231,599 2,305,842 666,840

September 2012 533,451 678,937 209,214 2,062,101 608,762

October 2012 538,977 685,970 211,443 2,116,717 631,917

November 2012 503,323 640,593 197,393 1,933,499 589,293

December 2012 526,795 670,467 206,619 1,968,478 605,845

January 2013 518,565 659,991 203,360 2,000,406 599,315

February 2013 489,453 622,940 192,130 1,850,533 557,844

March 2013 532,577 677,826 209,223 2,011,978 625,856

April 2013 521,735 664,027 204,818 2,016,697 612,948

May 2013 550,306 700,389 216,030 2,137,208 641,529

June 2013 543,529 691,765 213,360 2,142,076 634,371

6,411,357$ 8,159,909$ 2,515,816$ 24,740,804$ 7,427,208$

Allocation

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County,

Nevada

General Fund 39,073,886$

Regional Road Impact Fee Fund 1,443,000

Other governmental funds 1,311,000

41,827,886

Distributed to the City of Reno, City of Sparks

and Washoe County, Nevada 13,718,435

55,546,321$

Notes:

rate indexed by the CPI through December 31, 2009 for a base rate of 10.5621 cents per gallon.

out the ballot question and it became effective January 1, 2010. The new basis for calculation was the 9 cent per gallon

(2) On November 4, 2008, the voters of Washoe County approved Washoe County Ballot Question RTC-5 which

imposed additional county taxes on motor vehicle fuel and various special fuels used in motor vehicles. These taxes

cause annual increases in the current amount of taxes imposed on such fuels based upon the lesser of the average

increase in the Producer Price Index for construction materials for the preceding 10 years or 7.8%. SB201 carried

(1) From October 2003 through December 2009, the Washoe County Tax Ordinance provided that the rate of levy of the 9 cent motor

vehicle fuel tax would be increased on the first day of each fiscal year by the lesser of (i) 4.5 percent or (ii)

the average percentage of the increase in the Consumer Price Index for West Urban Consumers for the preceding

5 years.

Year ended June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF SPECIAL AND REGULAR MOTOR

VEHICLE FUEL TAX COLLECTIONS BY MONTH

81

Page 99: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Local Local

Regular Motor Regular Motor

Vehicle Fuel Vehicle Fuel

Tax - 1¢ Tax -Index Total

142,709$ 409,043$ 4,898,160$

149,841 429,199 5,125,147

135,387 387,671 4,615,523

136,789 391,975 4,713,788

127,741 365,952 4,357,794

133,698 383,044 4,494,946

131,609 377,062 4,490,308

124,220 356,240 4,193,360

135,166 387,932 4,580,558

132,414 379,766 4,532,405

139,665 400,555 4,785,682

137,945 395,604 4,758,650

1,627,184$ 4,664,043$ 55,546,321$

Year ended June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF SPECIAL AND REGULAR MOTOR

VEHICLE FUEL TAX COLLECTIONS BY MONTH

82

Page 100: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Right- Engineering

of-way and

Acquisition Inspection Construction Total

Pavement Preservation Projects

All Jurisdictions

Alignment, plan line, technical studies -$ 195,178$ 58,673$ 253,851$

ADA pedestrian transition improvement plan 2013 - 36,631 - 36,631

Intersection corrective maintenance FY11 - - (139) (139)

Intersection corrective maintenance FY12 - 146,560 1,422,881 1,569,441

Intersection corrective maintenance FY13 - 186,328 - 186,328

Regional road maintenance - fuel tax funded - 476,565 1,991,640 2,468,205

Regional road maintenance - public transportation tax - 316,468 2,976,450 3,292,918

funded

Washoe County

Caughlin Parkway - Longknife/McCarran - 121,159 391,198 512,357

Redrock Road - Adoby/Argosy - 146,419 - 146,419

City of Reno

4th and Prater corridor improvement - Evans/Galetti 195 195,773 - 195,968

Avenida de Landa - Beaumont/North of Valleywood - 38,561 - 38,561

Board discretionary project - NW sidewalk improvement - - 10,000 10,000

Caughlin Pkwy./Bridge St. - Longknife/McCarran/ - 2,884 435,700 438,584

Front/3rd

Delucchi Lane - Virginia/Tyrone - 79,430 - 79,430

Fifth St. - Ralston/Railroad crossing - 91,968 - 91,968

Lakeside Dr. - Brinkby/Mt. Rose - 198,066 - 198,066

Lyberty/Ryland - Center/Holcomb-Kirman/Mill 4,350 97,068 70,690 172,108

Mayberry Drive - Truckee River/Canyon - 151,030 2,035,770 2,186,800

Neil Road/Gentry/Terminal Way - Moana/Plumb - 177,203 168,745 345,948

N. Virginia - 4th to 6th/Maple to 8th - 27,334 15 27,349

Plumas Street sidewalks - Moana/Plumb - 51,525 - 51,525

Plumb Lane - McCarran/Ferris - 435,191 80,250 515,441

Reno Consolidated 10-01 - Crummer/Green Acres/ - 110,298 597,849 708,147

Sutro Complete Street - Mill to McCarran 16,963 206,845 - 223,808

West Huffaker - Del Monte to Spring Leaf - 100,677 716,900 817,577

City of Sparks

4th/Prater corridor improvement - Galetti/Pyramid 195 195,773 - 195,968

Board discretionary projects - - 9,720 9,720

East Nugget Ave. - McCarran/End of pavement - 16,269 - 16,269

Nichols Blvd. - Bike/Pedestrian improvements - 117,916 1,241,271 1,359,187

Prater Way Enhancements Phase 3 - View/22nd - 75,107 764,063 839,170

Prater Way Enhancements Phase 4 - 20th/22nd - 79,283 - 79,283

Sparks Consolidated 11-01 - Marietta/Snyder - 74,201 475,846 550,047

Sparks Consolidated 12-01 - Greenbrae/Merchant - 208,021 1,343,881 1,551,902

21,703 4,355,731 14,791,403 19,168,837

Capacity Improvement Projects

Pyramid/McCarran intersection improvement 709,232 - - 709,232

Total Fuel Tax Projects 730,935$ 4,355,731$ 14,791,403$ 19,878,069$

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT EXPENDITURES

GENERAL FUND

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

83

Page 101: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Right- Engineering

of-way and Impact Fee

Acquisition Inspection Construction Credits Total

Capacity Improvement Projects

Northwest District

N. McCarran/N. Virgina intersection -$ 224,011$ -$ -$ 224,011$

Robb/Sharlands intersection - 3,160 15,356 - 18,516

Traffic and Pedestrian signal safety - - 3,841 - 3,841

upgrade

Northeast District

Pyramid Hwy./US 395 Connector - 380,084 - - 380,084

Vista Blvd. widening - Los Altos/ - 24,440 86,408 - 110,848

Wingfield Springs

Traffic and Pedestrian signal safety - - 13,659 - 13,659

upgrade

South District

Geiger Grade realignment - 147,367 - - 147,367

Plumb/Terminal ITS - 69,715 770,027 - 839,742

Moana Lane widening - S. Virginia/ 802,501 847,488 11,132,789 - 12,782,778

Neil

Traffic and Pedestrian signal safety - - 25,183 - 25,183

upgrade

Multi-District

Bicycle/Pedestrian improvements - 60,815 699,303 - 760,118

McCarran Blvd. widening - 12,059 487,038 4,949,623 - 5,448,720

Longley/Greg

Pyramid/McCarran intersection 257,170 1,198,328 - - 1,455,498

Southeast connector phase 1 8,124,023 3,043,360 20,422,640 - 31,590,023

Southeast connector phase 2 - 3,824,969 70,172 - 3,895,141

Spot intersection improvements - 25,864 170,982 - 196,846

U.S. 395/Meadowood interchange 5,280 179,554 - - 184,834

Virginia St. transit signal priority - 46,888 - - 46,888

System corridor studies - 150,000 - - 150,000

Impact Fee Credits Issued

Northwest District - - - 1,892,736 1,892,736

Northeast District - - - 3,743,021 3,743,021

South District - - - 1,835,031 1,835,031

9,201,033$ 10,713,081$ 38,359,983$ 7,470,788$ 65,744,885$

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT EXPENDITURES

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

(Regional Road Impact Fee Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

84

Page 102: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project New

Appropriations Project

July 1, 2012 Appropriations

Pavement Preservation Projects

All Jurisdictions

ADA Pedestrian Transition Improvement Plan 2012

Engineering and inspection 65,000$ 36,860$ $ 36,631

Construction 435,000 - -

ADA Pedestrian Transition Improvement Plan 2013

Engineering and inspection - 65,000 -

Construction - 435,000 -

Alignment, plan line, technical studies

Engineering and inspection 555,640 - 195,178

Construction - 258,673 58,673

Corrective Maintenance 12

Engineering and inspection 165,220 - 146,560

Construction 1,698,200 - 1,422,881

Corrective Maintenance 13

Engineering and inspection 148,148 250,832 186,328

Construction - 1,373,007 -

Corrective Maintenance 14

Engineering and inspection - 149,000 -

Intersection corrective maintenance FY11

Engineering and inspection 18,241 - -

Construction 234,192 - (139)

Regional road maintenance - fuel tax funded

Engineering and inspection 127,806 348,759 476,565

Construction 5,410,000 1,514,900 1,991,640

Regional road maintenance - public transportation tax

funded

Engineering and inspection 318,755 379,386 316,468

Construction 3,515,593 6,890,568 2,976,450

Total All Jurisdictions 12,691,795 11,701,985 7,807,235

Washoe County

Caughlin Pkwy. - Longknife/McCarran

Engineering and inspection - 121,159 121,159

Construction - 667,760 391,198

Redrock Road - Adobe to Argosy

Engineering and inspection 202,762 170,473 146,419

Construction 2,787,986 - -

Total Washoe County 2,990,748 959,392 658,776

FOR PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN RESERVE

GENERAL FUND

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

Expenditures

85

Page 103: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project

Appropriations

June 30, 2013

$ - 65,229$

(36,860) 398,140

- 65,000

- 435,000

(78,393) 282,069

- 200,000

- 18,660

(201,852) 73,467

- 212,652

- 1,373,007

- 149,000

(18,241) -

(234,331) -

- -

(2,206,659) 2,726,601

- 381,673

(377,610) 7,052,101

(3,153,946) 13,432,599

- -

(52,294) 224,268

- 226,816

(1,097,972) 1,690,014

(1,150,266) 2,141,098

Net

Project

Adjustments

86

Page 104: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project New

Appropriations Project

July 1, 2012 Appropriations

Pavement Preservation Projects - Continued

City of Reno - Continued

4th St. - Prater Way corridor improvement -

Evans/Galetti

Right-of-way acquisition -$ 195$ $ 195

Engineering and inspection - 499,805 195,773

Board discretionary project - NW sidewalk

improvements

Construction - 10,000 10,000

Avenida de Landa - Beaumont/865' N. of Valleywood

Engineering and inspection 63,466 62,374 38,561

Construction 698,137 - -

Caughlin Pkwy./Bridge St. - Longknife/McCarran

Front/3rd

Engineering and inspection 158,108 - 2,884

Construction 1,266,882 - 435,700

Delucchi Lane - Virginia/Tyrone

Engineering and inspection 88,435 107,572 79,430

Construction 972,787 69,214 -

Fifth Street - Ralston to RRXng

Engineering and inspection 76,659 166,493 91,968

Construction 843,252 - -

Gentry Way and Second St. - Brinkby/Virginia,

Giroux/Kietzke

Construction - 957,479 -

Golden Valley Rd. and Carlyle Dr. - Yorkshire/

N. Virginia, Montgomery/Yorkshire

Engineering and inspection - 92,886 -

Construction - 911,746 -

Lakeside Drive - Brinkby to Mt. Rose

Engineering and inspection 122,050 191,979 198,066

Construction 672,115 1,013,892 -

Liberty Street - Center to Holcomb

Engineering and inspection 44,583 - -

Construction 446,417 - -

Liberty St. and Ryland St. - Center/Holcomb,

Kirman/Mill

Right-of-way acquisition - 4,350 4,350

Engineering and inspection - 173,285 97,068

Construction - 891,444 70,690

FOR PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS - CONTINUED

GENERAL FUND

(Regional Street and Highway Fund)

Year ended June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Expenditures

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN RESERVE

87

Page 105: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project

Appropriations

June 30, 2013

$ - -$

- 304,032

- -

- 87,279

(698,137) -

(68,865) 86,359

(667,760) 163,422

- 116,577

- 1,042,001

- 151,184

(85,099) 758,153

- 957,479

- 92,886

- 911,746

- 115,963

- 1,686,007

(44,583) -

(446,417) -

- -

- 76,217

- 820,754

Net

Project

Adjustments

88

Page 106: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project New

Appropriations Project

July 1, 2012 Appropriations

Pavement Preservation Projects - Continued

City of Reno - Continued

Mayberry Dr. - Hunter Lake/California

Construction -$ 995,939$ $ -

Mayberry Dr. - Truckee River to Canyon Drive

Engineering and inspection 210,092 - 151,030

Construction 2,320,782 - 2,035,770

Neil Road/Gentry/Terminal Way -

Moana/Plumb

Engineering and inspection 298,733 - 177,203

Construction 1,856,321 30,565 168,745

N. Virginia - 4th/6th/Maple/8th

Engineering and inspection 10,277 - 27,334

Construction - - 15

Plumas St. Sidewalks - Moana to Plumb

Engineering and inspection 30,000 28,500 51,525

Construction 270,000 - -

Plumb Lane - McCarran/Ferris

Engineering and inspection 738,626 819,612 435,191

Construction - 4,601,132 80,250

Reno Consolidated 10-01 - Crummer/

Green Acres, Huffaker

Engineering and inspection 110,306 76,852 110,298

Construction 760,914 - 597,849

Ryland Street - Kirman to Mill

Engineering and inspection 28,395 - -

Construction 268,346 - -

Sutro Complete St. - Mill to McCarran

Right-of-way acquisition - 16,963 16,963

Engineering and inspection 185,218 108,850 206,845

Construction 1,005,625 382,039 -

Virginia St. - Arroyo/Liberty

Engineering and inspection - 598,000 -

Virginia St. - Truckee River bridge replacement

Construction - 2,000,000 -

W. Huffaker - Del Monte/Spring Leaf

Engineering and inspection 106,037 - 100,677

Construction 992,602 - 716,900

Total City of Reno 14,645,165 14,811,166 6,101,280

Regional Transportation Commission

Expenditures

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN RESERVE

FOR PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS - CONTINUED

GENERAL FUND

Year ended June 30, 2013

(Regional Street and Highway Fund)

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

89

Page 107: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project

Appropriations

June 30, 2013

$ - 995,939$

(59,062) -

(285,012) -

- 121,530

- 1,718,141

17,057 -

15 -

- 6,975

(28,500) 241,500

- 1,123,047

- 4,520,882

(76,860) -

(163,065) -

(28,395) -

(268,346) -

- -

- 87,223

- 1,387,664

- 598,000

- 2,000,000

(5,360) -

(275,702) -

(3,184,091) 20,170,960

Adjustments

Net

Project

90

Page 108: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project New

Appropriations Project

July 1, 2012 Appropriations

Pavement Preservation Projects - Continued

City of Sparks

4th St. - Prater Way corridor improvement -

Galetti/Pyramid

Right-of-way acquisition -$ 195$ $ 195

Engineering and inspection - 499,805 195,773

Board discretionary project - Vista/Disc signal

Construction - 9,720 9,720

E. Nugget Ave. - McCarran/End of pavement

Engineering and inspection - 41,471 16,269

Construction - 530,348 -

Nichols Blvd - Victorian/Howard bike/ped improvements

Engineering and inspection 72,208 54,770 117,916

Construction 1,413,210 - 1,241,271

Prater Way and El Rancho Dr. - Stanford/Sparks Blvd.,

Victorian/Prater

Engineering and inspection - 219,446 -

Prater Way Enhancements Phase 3 - View to 22nd

Engineering and inspection 75,232 11,500 75,107

Construction 776,444 23,939 764,063

Prater Way Enhancements Phase 4 - 22nd to 20th

Engineering and inspection 175,000 34,000 79,283

Construction - 650,000 -

Sparks Consolidated 11-01 - Marietta/Snider

Engineering and inspection - 74,201 74,201

Construction - 475,846 475,846

Sparks Consolidated 12-01 - Greenbrae/Merchant

Engineering and inspection 213,200 - 208,021

Construction 1,387,664 - 1,343,881

Total City of Sparks 4,112,958 2,625,241 4,601,546

Total Pavement Preservation Projects 34,440,666 30,097,784 19,168,837

Capacity Improvement Projects

Pyramid/McCarran intersection improvement

Right-of-way acquisition - 709,232 709,232

Total capacity improvement projects - 709,232 709,232

Total Projects 34,440,666$ 30,807,016$ $ 19,878,069

Expenditures

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN RESERVE

FOR PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS - CONTINUED

(Regional Street and Highway Fund)

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

GENERAL FUND

Year ended June 30, 2013

91

Page 109: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project

Appropriations

June 30, 2013

$ - -$

- 304,032

- -

- 25,202

- 530,348

(9,062) -

(171,939) -

- 219,446

- 11,625

- 36,320

- 129,717

- 650,000

- -

- -

(5,179) -

(43,783) -

(229,963) 1,906,690

(7,718,266) 37,651,347

- -

- -

$ (7,718,266) 37,651,347$

Adjustments

Net

Project

92

Page 110: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project New

Appropriations Project

July 1, 2012 Appropriations Expenditures

Capacity Improvement Projects

Northwest District

Intersection improvements - N. McCarran and

N. Virginia

Engineering and inspection 916,115$ -$ 224,011$

Construction 3,000,000 - -

Intersection improvements 03 - Robb/Sharlands

Engineering and inspection 167,864 - 3,160

Construction - 15,356 15,356

Traffic and Pedestrian signal safety upgrade

Construction - 3,841 3,841

Total Northwest District 4,083,979 19,197 246,368

Northeast District

Pyramid Hwy./US 395 Link

Engineering and inspection 1,083,135 250,000 380,084

Vista Blvd. widening - Los Altos/

Wingfield Springs

Engineering and inspection 15,562 99,937 24,440

Construction 1,273,499 - 86,408

Traffic and Pedestrian signal safety upgrade

Construction - 13,659 13,659

Total Northeast District 2,372,196 363,596 504,591

South District

Geiger Grade realignment

Engineering and inspection 1,942,635 - 147,367

Plumb/Terminal ITS

Engineering and inspection 81,835 - 69,715

Construction 858,888 - 770,027

Moana Lane widening - S. Virginia/Neil

Right-of-way acquisition - 802,501 802,501

Engineering and inspection 808,226 - 847,488

Construction 12,349,212 - 11,132,789

Traffic and Pedestrian signal safety upgrade

Construction - 25,183 25,183

Total South District 16,040,796 827,684 13,795,070

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN RESERVE

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

(Regional Road Impact Fee Fund)

FOR PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS

Year ended June 30, 2013

93

Page 111: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

Net for Project

Project Appropriations

Adjustments June 30, 2013

$ - 692,104$

- 3,000,000

(164,704) -

- -

- -

(164,704) 3,692,104

- 953,051

(91,059) -

(1,187,091) -

- -

(1,278,150) 953,051

- 1,795,268

(12,120) -

(88,861) -

- -

39,262 -

(802,501) 413,922

- -

(864,220) 2,209,190

94

Page 112: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project New

Appropriations Project

July 1, 2012 Appropriations Expenditures

Multi-District

Bicycle/Pedestrian improvements 10/11

Engineering and inspection 53,770$ 7,045$ 60,815$

Construction 382,482 316,821 699,303

Bicycle/Pedestrian improvements 11/12

Engineering and inspection 70,000 - -

Construction 480,000 - -

Bicycle/Pedestrian improvements 12/13

Engineering and inspection 50,000 - -

Construction 350,000 - -

McCarran Blvd. widening - Longley/Greg

Right-of-way acquisition - 12,059 12,059

Engineering and inspection 775,936 - 487,038

Construction 28,814,627 - 4,949,623

Pyramid/McCarran intersection

Right-of-way acquisition - 257,170 257,170

Engineering and inspection 1,411,868 5,816,186 1,198,328

Construction 51,953,250 - -

Signal coordination project 08/09

Engineering and inspection 20,188 - -

Signal coordination project 09/10

Engineering and inspection 129,915 - -

Southeast connector phase 1 - Greg/Clean

Water Way

Right-of-way acquisition - 8,124,023 8,124,023

Engineering and inspection 6,121,154 1,372,270 3,043,360

Construction 19,538,432 47,319,905 20,422,640

Southeast connector phase 2 - Clean Water

Way/Veterans Pkwy.

Engineering and inspection - 12,165,131 3,824,969

Construction - 16,834,869 70,172

System corridor studies

Engineering and inspection 450,000 - 150,000

T/E spot intersection improvements 09/10

Engineering and inspection 2,169 - 2,196

Construction 148,508 - 3,231

T/E spot intersection improvements 10/11

Engineering and inspection 23,809 - 23,668

Construction 347,239 - 167,751

Year ended June 30, 2013

FOR PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS - CONTINUED

(Regional Road Impact Fee Fund)

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN RESERVE

95

Page 113: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

Net for Project

Project Appropriations

Adjustments June 30, 2013

$ - -$

- -

- 70,000

- 480,000

- 50,000

- 350,000

- -

- 288,898

(12,059) 23,852,945

- -

- 6,029,726

(31,278,838) 20,674,412

(20,188) -

(129,915) -

- -

- 4,450,064

- 46,435,697

- 8,340,162

- 16,764,697

- 300,000

27 -

(145,277) -

(141) -

(179,488) -

96

Page 114: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

for Project New

Appropriations Project

July 1, 2012 Appropriations Expenditures

Multi-District - Continued

T/E spot intersection improvements 12/13

Construction -$ 500,000$ -$

Traffic management 1 FY11

Engineering and inspection 584,000 - -

Construction 2,336,000 - -

Traffic management 2 FY12

Engineering and inspection 73,000 - -

Construction 1,387,000 - -

U.S. 395/Meadowood interchange

Right-of-way acquisition - 5,280 5,280

Engineering and inspection 595,007 - 179,554

Construction 12,626,548 - -

Virginia Street transit signal priority

Engineering and inspection - 46,888 46,888

Total Multi-District 128,724,902 92,777,647 43,728,068

Total changes in reserve for

project appropriations 151,221,873$ 93,988,124$ 58,274,097$

Year ended June 30, 2013

(Regional Road Impact Fee Fund)

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN RESERVE

FOR PROJECT APPROPRIATIONS - CONTINUED

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

97

Page 115: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Reserve

Net for Project

Project Appropriations

Adjustments June 30, 2013

$ - 500,000$

- 584,000

(1,387,000) 949,000

- 73,000

- 1,387,000

- -

- 415,453

(12,580,000) 46,548

- -

(45,732,879) 132,041,602

$ (48,039,953) 138,895,947$

98

Page 116: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

4th St. Prater Way corridor improvement -$ 391,936$ 391,936$ 608,064$

ADA pedestrian transition improvement plan 2012 - 36,631 36,631 463,369

ADA pedestrian transition improvement plan 2013 - - - 500,000

Albert-Bravo 90,764 - 90,764 -

Alignment, plan line, technical studies 2,158,309 253,851 2,412,160 482,069

Alturas - Keystone/Earl 797,128 - 797,128 -

Arlington/1st/Elm Street 3,325,154 - 3,325,154 -

Avenida de Landa - Beaumont/865' N. Valleywood - 38,561 38,561 87,279

Baker Lane/Colman Drive 1,563,418 - 1,563,418 -

Baring Blvd./McCarran/Sparks Blvd. 735,979 - 735,979 -

Baring Blvd./Sparks/Vista 1,536,322 - 1,536,322 -

Board Discretionary Projects -

Washoe County 19,946 - 19,946 -

Reno - 10,000 10,000 -

Sparks 25,169 9,720 34,889 -

Boxington Way - Lincoln/Lillard 771,209 - 771,209 -

Bravo Ave. - Mt. Limbo/Ramsey 866,677 - 866,677 -

California Ave./ Liberty/Ryland 873,386 - 873,386 -

Casazza - Wells /Kietzke 1,595,069 - 1,595,069 -

Cashill/Skyline 2,168,552 - 2,168,552 -

Caughlin Parkway-Sawbuck/Longknife 977,185 - 977,185 -

Caughlin Parkway/Bridge St.- 132,058 950,941 1,082,999 474,049

Longknife/McCarran/Front/3rd

Center Street 2,241,994 - 2,241,994 -

Center Street overlay - Plaza/19th 374,460 - 374,460 -

Clearacre/Scottsdale 42,000 - 42,000 -

Coliseum/Yori - Peckham/Gentry 760,552 - 760,552 -

Computer signal system 190,000 - 190,000 -

Corrective maintenance 12 136,580 1,569,441 1,706,021 92,127

Corrective maintenance 13 - 186,328 186,328 1,585,659

Corrective maintenance 14 - - - 149,000

County Estates - Huffaker 1,060,740 - 1,060,740 -

County-wide 184,950 - 184,950 -

County bridge - Galena Creek 353,599 - 353,599 -

Country Club Drive 664,059 - 664,059 -

Dandini Blvd. 1,005,190 - 1,005,190 -

Delucchi Lane - Virginia/Tyrone - 79,430 79,430 1,158,578

Deming Way - Greg/Kleppe 692,449 - 692,449 -

Department of Energy traffic and street 988,364 - 988,364 -

light retrofit

Donati Lane/Vista Blvd. 1,216,154 - 1,216,154 -

E. Glendale - McCarran/RR Xng 1,226,316 - 1,226,316 -

E.Greg Street 1,293,369 - 1,293,369 -

East Lake Blvd. 783,530 - 783,530 -

E. Lincoln Wy. - McCarran/Howard 236,596 - 236,596 -

E. Lincoln Wy. - Sparks/Lillard 337,446 - 337,446 -

E. Lincoln Wy. - Stanford/Howard 690,659 - 690,659 -

E. Moana Lane 54,764 - 54,764 -

E. Ninth Street 148,162 - 148,162 -

E. Nugget Ave. - McCarran/End of pavement - 16,269 16,269 555,550

Echo Ave. - Mt. Bismark/Military 982,740 - 982,740 -

El Rancho Drive 1,331,531 - 1,331,531 -

Expenditures

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

GENERAL FUND

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT EXPENDITURES

99

Page 117: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

El Rancho Drive - McCarran/

Sun Valley Road 871,775$ -$ 871,775$ -$

El Rancho - Sun Valley/Sullivan 1,408,196 - 1,408,196 -

El Rancho - Sullivan/McCarran 1,341,019 - 1,341,019 -

Emerson Way - Pyramid/N. Truckee 2,101,524 - 2,101,524 -

Evans Avenue 943,829 - 943,829 -

Evans Avenue/Fourth St./Jodi 1,887,228 - 1,887,228 -

Evans St./Highland Ave. - Jodi/Enterprise/ 1,059,969 - 1,059,969 -

Evans/Valley

First Street - Prater/Richard 912,015 - 912,015 -

Fifth Street - Ralston/RR Xng - 91,968 91,968 909,337

Foothill/Thomas Creek bridge 117,830 - 117,830 -

Franklin Way - Greg/Kleppe 371,847 - 371,847 -

Freeport Blvd. 50,000 - 50,000 -

Freeport and Steneri - 21st/

Steneri/Glendale 118,873 - 118,873 -

Galetti Way - Kietzke/Fourth 1,018,720 - 1,018,720 -

Geiger Grade/Toll Road 8,188,519 - 8,188,519 -

Gentry Way and Second St. - Brinkby/Virginia/

Giroux/Kietzke - - - 957,479

Gentry/Virginia/Kietzke 864,863 - 864,863 -

Glendale Avenue 4,946,368 - 4,946,368 -

Golden Valley 211,382 - 211,382 -

Golden Valley - N. Hills/U.S. 395 631,855 - 631,855 -

Golden Valley and Carlyle - Yorkshire/N. Virginia/

Montgomery/Yorkshire - - - 1,004,632

Greenbrae - Rock/Fourth 816,660 - 816,660 -

Greenbrae - Rock/Pyramid 21,182 - 21,182 -

Greg Street 4,343,180 - 4,343,180 -

Greg Street - McCarran Intersection/

Prater drainage 140,000 - 140,000 -

Greg Street - Mill/Truckee River 749,884 - 749,884 -

Greg St. Phase I - RR Xng/Sparks Blvd. 2,387,066 - 2,387,066 -

Greg St. Phase II - Sparks Blvd./I80 3,666,549 - 3,666,549 -

Greg Street - Reno limit/McCarran 1,550,952 - 1,550,952 -

Greg Street - Spice Island 687,487 - 687,487 -

Greg Street - Truckee River/Rock 599,797 - 599,797 -

Harvard Way - Linden to Vassar 1,717,554 - 1,717,554 -

Howard/Greenbrae/Sparks 441,573 - 441,573 -

Howard Drive/Lincoln/Prater/

Vista to east city limits 736,655 - 736,655 -

Hunter Lake - Plumb/Mayberry 768,273 - 768,273 -

Incline traffic signal 5,937 - 5,937 -

Industrial Way/Coney Island/Glendale 793,183 - 793,183 -

International Place/Ice House Road 454,428 - 454,428 -

Intersection corrective maintenance FY10 1,465,920 - 1,465,920 -

Intersection corrective maintenance FY11 1,247,567 (139) 1,247,428 -

Keystone Avenue/California

Avenue/Booth St. intersection 248,679 - 248,679 -

Keystone Avenue rehabilitation 1,036,521 - 1,036,521 -

Kirman - Casazza/Plumb 146,912 - 146,912 -

Kirman/Kuenzli/Apple 412,286 - 412,286 -

Kirman/Locust 3,752,490 - 3,752,490 -

Kleppe - Greg/N. Truckee Drain 2,778,473 - 2,778,473 -

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT EXPENDITURES - CONTINUED

GENERAL FUND

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

Expenditures

100

Page 118: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

Kuenzli Street 119,416$ -$ 119,416$ -$

Kuenzli Street bridge 496,598 - 496,598 -

Kuenzli Street - 2nd 1,487,274 - 1,487,274 -

La Posada/Eagle Canyon at Pyramid Hwy. 1,752,339 - 1,752,339 -

Lakeshore Drive 1,134,078 - 1,134,078 -

Lakeside Drive 1,182,372 - 1,182,372 -

Lakeside Drive - Brinkby/Mt. Rose - 198,066 198,066 1,801,970

Lakeside - Huffaker/Meadowridge 612,170 - 612,170 -

Larkin Circle/Madison Ave. - Greg/Greg 709,203 - 709,203 -

Las Brisas - McCarran/Brittania 818,312 - 818,312 -

Lear Blvd. - Moya/Zeolite 1,483,799 - 1,483,799 -

Lemmon Drive - Buck/Patrician 1,495,172 - 1,495,172 -

Lemmon Drive - Patrician/Ramsey 1,019,271 - 1,019,271 -

Lemmon Drive - Patrician/Waterash 1,446,833 - 1,446,833 -

Lemmon Drive, Phase I 357,708 - 357,708 -

Lemmon Drive, Phase II and III 394,729 - 394,729 -

Liberty/Ryland - Center/Holcomb/Kirman/Mill - 172,108 172,108 896,971

Lillard - Brierly/Prater 1,177,261 - 1,177,261 -

Linda Way/Southern Way - Coney

Island/Glendale/Greg/Freeport 1,201,905 - 1,201,905 -

Longitudinal joint study 65,470 - 65,470 -

Longley Lane - Houston/Rock 2,045,694 - 2,045,694 -

Longley Lane - Huffaker realignment 227,910 - 227,910 -

Longley Lane - S. Virginia St./Peckham Ln. 2,242,374 - 2,242,374 -

Longley - McCarran/Houston 2,150,102 - 2,150,102 -

Longley - McCarran/S. Virginia 3,760,669 - 3,760,669 -

Loop Road/Salomon Circle -

Vista/end of pavement/cul de sac 629,758 - 629,758 -

Los Altos Pkwy. - Canyon Run/Goodwin 441,188 - 441,188 -

Mae Anne/Sierra Highlands - Avenida

de Landa/McCarran 2,551,997 - 2,551,997 -

Mae Anne - Avenida de Landa/Ambassador 675,540 - 675,540 -

Mae Anne - Sharlands/Avenida de Landa 1,578,105 - 1,578,105 -

Mayberry Drive 3,025,256 - 3,025,256 -

Mayberry Dr. - Canyon/W. McCarran 1,659,547 - 1,659,547 -

Mayberry Dr. - Hunter Lake/California - - - 995,939

Mayberry Dr. - McCarran/California 2,628,315 - 2,628,315 -

Mayberry Dr. - Truckee River/Canyon 159,683 2,186,800 2,346,483 -

Mays and Tanager - Lakeshore/Village 754,427 - 754,427 -

McCarran Blvd. - Cashill/Plumb 116,563 - 116,563 -

McCarran Blvd. - forensic study 36,693 - 36,693 -

McCarran Blvd. - Greensboro/Skyline 852,287 - 852,287 -

McCarran Blvd. - Mira Loma/Equity 1,212,775 - 1,212,775 -

McCarran Blvd. - Mira Loma/

S. Virginia Street 2,158,994 - 2,158,994 -

McCarran Blvd. - Plumas/Greensboro 250,000 - 250,000 -

McCarran Blvd. /I-80/Prater 64,396 - 64,396 -

McCarran Blvd. - S. Virginia/4th 11,611,934 - 11,611,934 -

Military Road 542,342 - 542,342 -

Military Road - Lemmon/Echo 2,780,321 - 2,780,321 -

Mill Street 2,453,504 - 2,453,504 -

PROJECT EXPENDITURES - CONTINUED

GENERAL FUND

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

Expenditures

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

Regional Transportation Commission

101

Page 119: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

Mill Street/Kietzke/Rock 3,233,994$ -$ 3,233,994$ -$

Mill Street - Rock/E. McCarran 1,919,943 - 1,919,943 -

Mill Street - Wells/Virginia 454,051 - 454,051 -

Mira Loma - Longley/McCarran 1,506,925 - 1,506,925 -

Mira Loma - McCarran/1,711' E. 398,356 - 398,356 -

Mira Loma - McCarran/Rosewood 476,022 - 476,022 -

Moana Lane 87,781 - 87,781 -

Moana - Neil/Longley 301,376 - 301,376 -

Moana - Neil/Peckham 991,505 - 991,505 -

Moana - Neil/Kietzke 946,617 - 946,617 -

Moana - Peckham/McCarran 6,834 - 6,834 -

Moana - Plumas/Kietzke 1,693,570 - 1,693,570 -

Moana - Plumas/Pioneer 29,500 - 29,500 -

Montello Street - 9th/Wedekind 1,159,797 - 1,159,797 -

Mount Rose St. - Arlington/Plumas 472,072 - 472,072 -

Moya Blvd - Redrock/Echo 2,143,452 - 2,143,452 -

Neil Road - Virginia/Delucci 622,975 - 622,975 -

Neil Road/Gentry/Terminal Way -

Moana/Plumb 108,301 345,948 454,249 1,839,671

Nichols Blvd. - E. McCarran/Howard 1,965,071 - 1,965,071 -

Nichols Blvd. - Bike/Pedestrian

improvements 147,182 1,359,187 1,506,369 -

Ninth Street - Virginia/Valley 620,911 - 620,911 -

North Hills Boulevard - Golden

Valley/1880' West 484,301 - 484,301 -

N. Virginia - 4th/6th/Maple/8th 2,842,221 27,349 2,869,570 -

Old 395 N. rehabilitation 1,551,287 - 1,551,287 -

Pagni Lane 467,304 - 467,304 -

Parr Blvd. 90,219 - 90,219 -

Parr Blvd - N. Virginia/US 395 2,469,681 - 2,469,681 -

Parr Circle/Catron Drive - Parr/Parr 1,266,490 - 1,266,490 -

Peckham Lane, Phases I and II 2,704,066 - 2,704,066 -

Peckham Lane - Kietzke/Longley 1,732,873 - 1,732,873 -

Peckham Lane - S. Virginia/Kietzke 774,381 - 774,381 -

Pembroke - McCarran/Steamboat Pkwy 18,357 - 18,357 -

Pembroke Drive 160,056 - 160,056 -

Pembroke/Steamboat Parkway 815,084 - 815,084 -

Pembroke Dr. - McCarran/Boynton Bridge 1,757,774 - 1,757,774 -

Plumas - Glenda/Plumb 1,419,557 - 1,419,557 -

Plumas - Manzanita/Glenda Way 1,026,092 - 1,026,092 -

Plumas - Moana/Urban 1,159,358 - 1,159,358 -

Plumas St. sidewalks - 51,525 51,525 248,475

Plumas - Sierra 993,209 - 993,209 -

Plumas - Moana south to end of pavement 2,467,726 - 2,467,726 -

Plumb Lane - Margot/S. Virginia 1,472,271 - 1,472,271 -

Plumb Lane - McCarran/Ferris 504,781 515,441 1,020,222 5,643,929

Prater Way 1,002,507 - 1,002,507 -

Prater Way and El Rancho Dr. - Stanford/

Sparks Blvd./Victorian/Prater - - - 219,446

Prater Way enhancements Ph. 3 437 839,170 839,607 47,945

Prater Way enhancements Ph. 4 - 79,283 79,283 779,717

Probasco Way 1,614,766 - 1,614,766 -

Purina Way - Spice Island/E. Greg 448,572 - 448,572 -

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT EXPENDITURES - CONTINUED

GENERAL FUND

Expenditures

102

Page 120: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

Putnam and Wyoming - Kings Row/

Keystone 817,093$ -$ 817,093$ -$

Pyramid Highway Corridor 402,761 - 402,761 -

Pyramid/McCarran intersection right-of-way - 709,232 709,232 -

Pyramid Way - Signal improvement 12,456 - 12,456 -

Pyramid - McCarran Blvd./north urban limit 1,581,221 - 1,581,221 -

Ralston St./5th St. - 2nd/5th/Keystone/

Ralston 1,854,752 - 1,854,752 -

Ranger Road - Panther/Newport 883,361 - 883,361 -

Red Rock - Adobe/Argosy - 146,419 146,419 1,916,830

Red Rock - Moya/U.S. 395 461,643 - 461,643 -

Red Rock - Osage 1,870,038 - 1,870,038 -

Red Rock - Silver Knolls/Adobe 303,947 - 303,947 -

Regional RMMS 290,439 - 290,439 -

Regional road maintenance - fuel tax 32,896,685 2,468,205 35,364,890 2,726,601

Regional road maintenance -

public transportation tax 8,611,101 3,292,918 11,904,019 7,433,774

Regional System Photo Study 60,005 - 60,005 -

Reno Consolidated 06-01- Court/Sierra 2,264,572 - 2,264,572 -

Reno Consolidated 06-02-

Airmotive/Condor/Bible 1,762,634 - 1,762,634 -

Reno Consolidated 07-01-

Corporate/Financial Blvd. 981,297 - 981,297 -

Reno Consolidated 07-02-

Ralston/S. Meadows Pkwy 757,306 - 757,306 -

Reno Consolidated 08-01 -

Kirman/Sutro/9th 1,888,858 - 1,888,858 -

Reno Consolidated 09-01 -

Vassar/Holcomb 3,428,153 - 3,428,153 -

Reno Consolidated 09-02 -

Matley/Market/Louise/

Redwood/Automotive 1,920,049 - 1,920,049 -

Reno Consolidated 10-01 - Crummer/

Green Acres/Huffaker 76,853 708,147 785,000 -

Reno Consolidated 10-02 - Bluestone/

Offenhausser/Patriot/Portman 1,866,520 - 1,866,520 -

Reno Consolidated 10-03 - Lakeside/

Manzanita 3,169,011 - 3,169,011 -

Reno Consolidated 10-04 - Brookside/

Energy/Edison/Joule/Reactor 4,370,038 - 4,370,038 -

Reno Consolidated 10-05 - Mira Loma/

Barron/Louie 863,130 - 863,130 -

Reno Consolidated 11-01 - First/State 1,663,549 - 1,663,549 -

Reno Consolidated 11-02 - Brinkby/

Lymberry 2,850,741 - 2,850,741 -

Reno Consolidated 11-03 - Gould/Kuenzli/

Sunshine/Prosperity 1,707,328 - 1,707,328 -

Reno overlays 225,997 - 225,997 -

Reno rehabilitation 97-1 1,065,046 - 1,065,046 -

Reno rehabilitation 98-2 1,273,479 - 1,273,479 -

Reno rehabilitation 98-3 1,676,960 - 1,676,960 -

Reno rehabilitation - Lake/Sierra/Sinclair 1,505,712 - 1,505,712 -

Reno-Sparks signal link 27,000 - 27,000 -

PROJECT EXPENDITURES - CONTINUED

GENERAL FUND

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

Expenditures

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

103

Page 121: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

Ring Road - northeast and

northwest quadrants 3,317,635$ -$ 3,317,635$ -$

Ridgeview Dr. - Plumas/Lakeside 358,494 - 358,494 -

Ridgeview Terrace/Plumas 1,442,660 - 1,442,660 -

Robb Drive - Walnut/S. Las Brisas 4,923,830 - 4,923,830 -

Rock Blvd. 3,016,760 - 3,016,760 -

Rock - Glendale/McCarran Blvd. 3,800,574 - 3,800,574 -

Rock - Glendale/Hymer 841,147 - 841,147 -

Rock Blvd. - Oddie/N. McCarran Blvd. 1,489,587 - 1,489,587 -

Rock Blvd. - Victorian/Oddie 1,944,538 - 1,944,538 -

Second Street bridge 308,140 - 308,140 -

Security Circle - N. Virginia/N. Virginia 835,227 - 835,227 -

Seventh Street - Akard/Keystone 3,573,805 - 3,573,805 -

Seventh Avenue - Sun Valley/Klondike 534,358 - 534,358 -

Sierra - 9th/N. Virginia Street 1,936,791 - 1,936,791 -

Silver Lake Blvd. - Silver Shores/

1,000' E. of Stead 1,790,071 - 1,790,071 -

Silver Lake Blvd. - 1000' E. of Stead/

Sky Vista 764,518 - 764,518 -

S. Stanford Way 699,429 - 699,429 -

S. Virginia Street - Gentry/Brinkby 396,492 - 396,492 -

S. Virginia Street - Wells

intersection relocation 2,556,207 - 2,556,207 -

S.E. McCarran Blvd. - Longley/Mill 3,875,960 - 3,875,960 -

S.E. McCarran Blvd. - Cashill/Plumb 5,237,865 - 5,237,865 -

S.W. McCarran Blvd. - Mayberry/US 40 4,599,570 - 4,599,570 -

S.W. McCarran Blvd. - Plumas/US 40 156,659 - 156,659 -

S.W. McCarran Blvd. - Plumas/Skyline 6,663,719 - 6,663,719 -

S.W. McCarran Blvd. - Plumb/Mayberry 529,845 - 529,845 -

S.W. McCarran Blvd. - Skyline/Cashill 1,277,939 - 1,277,939 -

S.W. McCarran Blvd. - Skyline/Mayberry 156,959 - 156,959 -

S.E. McCarran Blvd. - S. Virginia/Longley 53,000 - 53,000 -

S.W. McCarran Blvd. - S. Virginia/Plumas 1,715,990 - 1,715,990 -

Socrates Dr. - McCarran/Sienna Park 1,914,449 - 1,914,449 -

Sparks Blvd. 2,145,524 - 2,145,524 -

Sparks Blvd. - Baring/Shadow 1,266,801 - 1,266,801 -

Sparks Blvd. - Shadow/Disc 8,432,386 - 8,432,386 -

Sparks Blvd. - I-80/E. Greg 1,286,356 - 1,286,356 -

Sparks Blvd. - I-80/Prater 1,527,293 - 1,527,293 -

Sparks Blvd. - left turn at McCabe 9,677 - 9,677 -

Sparks Blvd. NB lanes - Prater/Baring 1,476,646 - 1,476,646 -

Sparks Consolidated 09-02 - Deming/

Bergin/Franklin/Meredith 1,152,136 - 1,152,136 -

Sparks Consolidated 09-03 - Freeport/

Steneri 2,231,867 - 2,231,867 -

Sparks Consolidated 10-01 - Pacific/

Hymer/15th/16th/18th/19th/Pittman/

Shaber/Frazer/Crane 5,008,735 - 5,008,735 -

Sparks Consolidated 11-01 - Marietta/

Snider 1,170,479 550,047 1,720,526 -

Sparks Consolidated 12-01 - Greenbrae/

Merchant 172,933 1,551,902 1,724,835 -

Expenditures

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

Regional Transportation Commission

PROJECT EXPENDITURES - CONTINUED

GENERAL FUND

104

Page 122: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

Sparks overlay projects 2,007,754$ -$ 2,007,754$ -$

Sparks rehabilitation project 1,628,273 - 1,628,273 -

Sparks rehabilitation project 3 820,166 - 820,166 -

Spice Island Dr./United Circle - Greg/

Franklin/Spice Island/Spice Island 2,395,074 - 2,395,074 -

Stead Blvd. - U.S. 395/Mt. Vida 2,859,984 - 2,859,984 -

Stoker Avenue 245,792 - 245,792 -

Sullivan Lane 30,000 - 30,000 -

Sullivan Lane - Byrd/McCarran 555,480 - 555,480 -

Summit Ridge/Sky Mountain -

W. McCarran to 4th 1,524,397 - 1,524,397 -

Sun Valley alignment 21,616 - 21,616 -

Sun Valley Drive 19,554 - 19,554 -

Sun Valley - 8th/Leon 533,064 - 533,064 -

Sun Valley - Spanish Springs 50,063 - 50,063 -

Sutro - 9th/McCarran Blvd. 1,606,380 - 1,606,380 -

Sutro Complete St. - Mill/McCarran 87,457 223,808 311,265 1,474,887

Tahoe-Pyramid link 183,716 - 183,716 -

Tahoe-Pyramid link - I-80/Mt. Rose 99,989 - 99,989 -

Tanburg Dr. - 7th/Mineral 225,718 - 225,718 -

Taylor - Virginia/Holcomb/Kirman 33,557 - 33,557 -

Terminal - Gentry/Mill Street 2,291,418 - 2,291,418 -

Terminal - Plumb/Mill Street 12,105 - 12,105 -

Thomas Creek - S. Saddlehorn/

Evening Song 1,242,478 - 1,242,478 -

Traffic signals 716,583 - 716,583 -

21st - Glendale/Greg 256,987 - 256,987 -

U.S. 395/S. McCarran Blvd./S. Virginia 394,390 - 394,390 -

University Terrace 829,055 - 829,055 -

Victorian Avenue Ph. I - Rock/16th 545,905 - 545,905 -

Victorian Avenue Ph. II - Pyramid/McCarran 3,383,103 - 3,383,103 -

Village - Tahoe to Country Club Dr. 1,290,321 - 1,290,321 -

Villanova - Harvard/Terminal 1,150,059 - 1,150,059 -

Virginia Street - Arroyo/Liberty - - - 598,000

Virginia Street - Truckee/I-80 24,418 - 24,418 -

Virginia Street - Truckee River bridge replacement - - - 2,000,000

Vista - Prater/Baring 1,801,361 - 1,801,361 -

Vista - Baring/Disc/Los Altos 3,438,894 - 3,438,894 -

Vista - I-80/Prater 1,721,671 - 1,721,671 -

Washington Street - 6th/7th 115,848 - 115,848 -

Washoe County regional

preventive maintenance 1,828,193 - 1,828,193 -

Wedekind Road - Sullivan/

McCarran 339,811 - 339,811 -

Wedekind Road - N. McCarran/

Malapi 597,965 - 597,965 -

Wedge - Despain/Mt. Rose 121,430 - 121,430 -

Wells Avenue overpass 3,163,717 - 3,163,717 -

Wells - Casazza/Second 110,438 - 110,438 -

Wells - 9th/Sutro 889,016 - 889,016 -

Wells - Kuenzli/7th St. 1,273,099 - 1,273,099 -

GENERAL FUND

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT EXPENDITURES - CONTINUED

Expenditures

105

Page 123: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

Wells - Virginia/Kuenzli 5,345,136$ -$ 5,345,136$ -$

W. 7th - Madera/NW McCarran 809,706 - 809,706 -

W. Huffaker - Del Monte/Spring Leaf 92,199 817,577 909,776 -

W. Moana Lane 188,145 - 188,145 -

West Sun Valley arterial 12,132 - 12,132 -

Whites Creek-Zolezzi/

S. Virginia Street 2,376,551 - 2,376,551 -

White Lake Parkway - Village/Brant 1,048,629 - 1,048,629 -

York Way 1,998,479 - 1,998,479 -

York Way - 18th/4th 116,049 - 116,049 -

Zolezzi Lane rehabilitation

and widening 1,164,468 - 1,164,468 -

432,342,017$ 19,878,069$ 452,220,086$ 37,651,347$

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

Expenditures

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT EXPENDITURES - CONTINUED

GENERAL FUND

(Regional Streets and Highways Fund)

106

Page 124: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

Arrowcreek Parkway 2,981,540$ -$ 2,981,540$ -$

Bicycle/Pedestrian improvements 718,767 760,118 1,478,885 950,000

Damonte Ranch/Double R intersection 437,940 - 437,940 -

Farnsworth 61 - 61 -

Geiger Grade realignment 785,045 147,367 932,412 1,795,268

Geiger Grade/Toll Road 1,762,624 - 1,762,624 -

Golden Valley Road 1,615,421 - 1,615,421 -

I580 northbound widening 20,000,000 - 20,000,000 -

Intersection improvement - Veterans/

Geiger Grade 5,294,747 - 5,294,747 -

Intersection improvements 97 - all districts 434,168 - 434,168 -

Intersection improvements 98 - all districts 965,019 - 965,019 -

Intersection improvements 02 - all districts 277,711 - 277,711 -

Intersection improvements 03 - all districts 2,926,012 18,516 2,944,528 -

Intersection improvements 04 - all districts 4,595,415 - 4,595,415 -

Intersection improvements 05 - all districts 271,527 - 271,527 -

Intersection improvements 07 - all districts 282,196 - 282,196 -

Lemmon Drive - Military realignment 3,044,517 - 3,044,517 -

Lemmon Drive - US395 /N. Virginia 182,424 - 182,424 -

Lemmon Drive - Memorial / US 395 360,331 - 360,331 -

Lincoln Way - Marina/Sparks Blvd. 13,200 - 13,200 -

Longley - McCarran/Moana 1,386,833 - 1,386,833 -

McCarran - Kietzke/Lakeside 645,172 - 645,172 -

McCarran - Prater/I-80 208,467 - 208,467 -

McCarran Blvd sidewalk improvement -

Nichols/Prater 149,881 - 149,881 -

McCarran Blvd widening - Longley/Greg 9,409,437 5,448,720 14,858,157 24,141,843

Moana Lane extension - Longley/Neil 22,756,313 - 22,756,313 -

Moana Lane widening - S. Virginia/Neil 23,142,561 12,782,778 35,925,339 413,922

Neil/Kietzke roundabout 1,404,622 - 1,404,622 -

N. McCarran/N. Virginia intersection 83,885 224,011 307,896 3,692,104

Plumb/Terminal ITS 97,391 839,742 937,133 -

Pyramid Hwy. - La Posada/Eagle Canyon 8,829,283 - 8,829,283 -

Pyramid/McCarran intersection 2,634,882 1,455,498 4,090,380 26,704,138

Pyramid/McCarran southbound

right turn lane 86,413 - 86,413 -

Pyramid Hwy./US 395 link 7,216,865 380,084 7,596,949 953,051

Red Rock - Moya/U.S. 395 710,254 - 710,254 -

Signal coordination project 1,492,556 - 1,492,556 -

Signal - Mt. Rose/Thomas Creek 324,961 - 324,961 -

Southeast connector alignment study 1,182,383 - 1,182,383 -

Southeast connector phase 1 - Greg/Clean

Water Way 13,524,415 31,590,023 45,114,438 50,885,761

Southeast connector phase 2 - Clean Water

Way/ Veterens Pkwy. - 3,895,141 3,895,141 25,104,859

Sparks Blvd. - Pyramid/Los Altos 4,402,862 - 4,402,862 -

Sun Valley/Clearacre 363,043 - 363,043 -

Sun Valley/Eagle Canyon 7,604 - 7,604 -

Sun Valley/W. 7th Avenue 364,407 - 364,407 -

System corridor studies 982,593 150,000 1,132,593 300,000

Traffic and pedestrian signal safety upgrade - 42,683 42,683 -

T/E spot intersection improvements 2,488,381 196,846 2,685,227 500,000

Expenditures

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT EXPENDITURES

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

(Regional Road Impact Fee Fund)

107

Page 125: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Unexpended

July 1, 1965 July 1, 2012 Balance of

through through Project

June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013 Total Appropriations

Traffic management -$ -$ -$ 2,993,000$

Traffic management center 268,948 - 268,948 -

Traffic signals 103,610 - 103,610 -

U.S. 395 NB and SB/Clearacre/Sun Valley 54,632,326 - 54,632,326 -

U.S. 395/Meadowood interchange 14,774,520 184,834 14,959,354 462,001

Virginia St. - Peckham/Moana 5,000 - 5,000 -

Virginia Street transit Q-jump 1,069,169 - 1,069,169 -

Virginia Street transit signal priority 1,019,611 46,888 1,066,499 -

Vista/Baring northbound left turn lane 461,633 - 461,633 -

Vista Blvd. corridor study 136,708 - 136,708 -

Vista/Pah Rah/Disc/Los Altos 2,723,274 - 2,723,274 -

Vista Blvd. widening - Los Altos/

Wingfield Springs 9,710,939 110,848 9,821,787 -

Vista Blvd/Sparks Blvd at Los Altos 763,018 - 763,018 -

White Lake Parkway 46,049 - 46,049 -

Zolezzi Ln./I-580 interchange 62,076 - 62,076 -

Zolezzi Ln. rehabilitation and widening 1,949,394 - 1,949,394 -

Impact fee credits issued:

Northwest District 35,855,845 1,892,736 37,748,581 -

Northeast District 66,200,765 3,743,021 69,943,786 -

South District 86,242,782 1,835,031 88,077,813 -

426,869,796$ 65,744,885$ 492,614,681$ 138,895,947$

For the period July 1, 1965 through June 30, 2013

Expenditures

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT EXPENDITURES - CONTINUED

SPECIAL REVENUE FUND

(Regional Road Impact Fee Fund)

108

Page 126: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Contents Page

Financial Trends

These schedules contain trend information to help understand how the RTC's financial

performance and well-being have changed over time.

Net Position by Component - Last ten fiscal years 110

Changes in Net Position - Last ten fiscal years 111

Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 113

Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 114

Revenue Capacity

These schedules contain information to help assess the factors affecting the RTC's ability

to generate revenue.

Revenues By Source, Governmental Funds 115

Revenues By Source, Proprietary Funds 116

Principal Regional Road Impact Fee Credit Recipients 117

Vehicle Miles Traveled 118

Direct & Overlapping Tax Rates 119

Debt Capacity

These schedules present information to help assess the affordability of the RTC's current

levels of outstanding debt and the RTC's ability to issue additional debt in the future.

Ratios Of Outstanding Debt By Type 120

Computation Of General Obligation Direct And Overlapping Debt 121

Pledged Revenue Bond Coverage And Limitations 122

Demographic and Economic Information

These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help understand the

environment within which the RTC's financial activities take place.

Demographic And Economic Statistics 123

Principal Employers - Current Year And Nine Years Ago 124

Operating Information

These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help understand how the

information in the RTC's financial report relates to the services the RTC provides and the

activities it performs.

Full Time Equivalent Government Employees By Department 125

RIDE Operating Statistics 126

ACCESS Operating Statistics 127

Capital Asset Information 128

This part of Regional Transportation Commission's (RTC) comprehensive annual financial

report presents historical perspective, context, and detail to assist in using the information in

the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information to

understand and assess the RTC's overall financial health.

Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the comprehensive

annual financial reports for the relevant year. The RTC implemented GASB Statement 34 in 2003;

schedules presenting government-wide information include information beginning in that year.

STATISTICAL SECTION - Unaudited

Page 127: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

Governmental activities

Invested in capital assets 5,882$ 5,919$ 6,737$ 6,987$ 7,454$ 8,951$ 7,102$ 8,220$ 7,073$ 6,156$ Restricted 259,684 131,269 186,450 27,150 8,089 10,191 9,887 8,402 13,392 12,806 Unrestricted (439,896) (262,933) (267,138) (54,255) 6,286 12,336 20,010 23,171 27,158 23,449

Total governmental activities(1) (174,330)$ (125,745)$ (73,951)$ (20,118)$ 21,829$ 31,478$ 36,999$ 39,793$ 47,623$ 42,411$

Business-type activities

Invested in capital assets 79,595$ 78,095$ 78,039$ 67,062$ 58,021$ 55,423$ 42,893$ 34,029$ 29,822$ 23,676$ Unrestricted 15,817 17,703 20,271 14,264 13,199 12,058 16,067 15,482 13,622 11,470

Total business-type activities 95,412$ 95,798$ 98,310$ 81,326$ 71,220$ 67,481$ 58,960$ 49,511$ 43,444$ 35,146$

Primary government

Invested in capital assets 85,477$ 84,014$ 84,776$ 74,049$ 65,475$ 64,374$ 49,995$ 42,249$ 36,895$ 29,832$ Restricted 259,684 131,269 186,450 27,150 8,089 10,191 25,954 23,884 27,014 24,276 Unrestricted (424,079) (245,230) (246,867) (39,991) 19,485 24,394 20,010 23,171 27,158 23,449

Total primary government (78,918)$ (29,947)$ 24,359$ 61,208$ 93,049$ 98,959$ 95,959$ 89,304$ 91,067$ 77,557$

(1) See Note Q for explanation of negative balances.

Last ten fiscal years

(Accrual basis of accounting)

(Amounts expressed in thousands)

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NET POSITION BY COMPONENT

110

Page 128: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

CHANGES IN NET POSITIONS

Last ten fiscal years

(Accrual basis of accounting)

(Amounts expressed in thousands)

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

Program revenues Governmental activities

Charges for servicesStreets and highways 713$ 1,792$ 13,265$ 3,762$ 15,286$ 30,862$ 17,100$ 29,431$ 20,317$ 27,916$ Transportation services 693 682 686 680 621 516 471 485 403 297

Operating grants and contributions 8,145 2,848 1,657 1,913 1,873 4,496 14,308 13,987 17,238 17,354 Capital grants and contributions 1,563 6,792 5,171 3,495 2,029 1,923 373 2,139 1,389 437

Total governmental activities 11,114 12,114 20,779 9,850 19,809 37,797 32,252 46,042 39,347 46,004

Business-type activitiesCharges for services

Passenger fares 5,959 5,917 5,738 6,025 7,013 7,318 7,163 6,908 6,264 5,956 Bus advertising 277 347 422 436 424 488 507 382 330 220 Rental income 460 434 437 463 478 475 478 506 471 462 Miscellaneous - - - 105 - - - - - -

Operating grants and contributions 3,989 3,483 9,814 7,476 3,120 2,983 3,251 3,941 3,666 3,412 Capital grants and contributions 5,463 4,580 15,279 10,809 10,505 14,511 10,448 5,902 6,973 4,715

Total business-type activities 16,148 14,761 31,690 25,314 21,540 25,775 21,847 17,639 17,704 14,765

Total program revenues 27,262$ 26,875$ 52,469$ 35,164$ 41,349$ 63,572$ 54,099$ 63,681$ 57,051$ 60,769$

Expenses Governmental activities

Streets and highways 91,016$ 85,851$ 89,240$ 64,868$ 48,422$ 63,099$ 55,114$ 73,107$ 54,659$ 54,728$ Transportation services 7,387 6,894 7,344 7,998 8,340 8,359 8,254 7,529 7,408 6,286 Metropolitan planning 2,803 3,452 2,122 2,100 2,276 2,552 2,510 2,487 2,036 2,572 Interest and fiscal charges 14,066 12,584 10,493 5,320 24 - 249 - - -

Total governmental activities 115,272 108,781 109,199 80,286 59,062 74,010 66,127 83,123 64,103 63,586

Business-type activitiesPublic transportation 30,110 29,761 30,639 29,520 31,949 31,832 30,145 27,755 25,021 22,343

Total expenses 145,382$ 138,542$ 139,838$ 109,806$ 91,011$ 105,842$ 96,272$ 110,878$ 89,124$ 85,929$

Net expenses

Governmental activities (104,158)$ (96,667)$ (88,420)$ (70,436)$ (39,253)$ (36,213)$ (33,875)$ (37,081)$ (24,756)$ (17,582)$ Business-type activities (13,962) (15,000) 1,051 (4,206) (10,409) (6,057) (8,298) (10,116) (7,317) (7,578)

Total net expense (118,120)$ (111,667)$ (87,369)$ (74,642)$ (49,662)$ (42,270)$ (42,173)$ (47,197)$ (32,073)$ (25,160)$

111

Page 129: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

CHANGES IN NET POSITION - CONTINUED

Last ten fiscal years

(Accrual basis of accounting)

(Amounts expressed in thousands)

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

General revenues and other changes in

net position

Governmental activitiesMotor vehicle fuel tax 41,828$ 35,319$ 29,385$ 21,835$ 19,177$ 18,106$ 17,900$ 17,672$ 17,257$ 16,670$ Public transportation tax 8,459 7,726 4,250 1,170 3,521 4,193 4,437 4,473 4,129 3,703 Regional Road Impact fees 8,598 Unrestricted investment earnings 207 1,085 556 631 591 1,226 1,434 669 1,119 133 Miscellaneous revenue 3 55 150 59 140 237 503 9 319 77 Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets 10 - - 5 2 29 8 9 - (2) Transfers (561) 338 246 4,193 6,173 6,900 6,800 6,419 5,300 4,122

Total governmental activities 58,544 44,523 34,587 27,893 29,604 30,691 31,082 29,251 28,124 24,703

Business-type activitiesPublic transportation tax 12,927 12,472 15,182 17,851 17,604 20,968 22,185 22,366 20,646 18,517 Investment earnings 35 321 71 191 347 481 500 185 211 59 Miscellaneous revenue 15 30 923 - 35 7 1,860 45 56 12 Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets 38 3 2 462 2,335 22 1 6 2 (2) Transfers 561 (338) (246) (4,193) (6,173) (6,900) (6,800) (6,419) (5,300) (4,122)

Total business-type activities 13,576 12,488 15,932 14,311 14,148 14,578 17,746 16,183 15,615 14,464

Total primary government 72,120$ 57,011$ 50,519$ 42,204$ 43,752$ 45,269$ 48,828$ 45,434$ 43,739$ 39,167$

Change in net position

Governmental activities (45,614)$ (52,144)$ (53,833)$ (42,543)$ (9,649)$ (5,522)$ (2,793)$ (7,830)$ 3,368$ 7,121$ Business-type activities (386) (2,512) 16,983 10,106 3,739 8,521 9,448 6,067 8,298 6,886

Total primary government (46,000)$ (54,656)$ (36,850)$ (32,437)$ (5,910)$ 2,999$ 6,655$ (1,763)$ 11,666$ 14,007$

112

Page 130: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

Last ten fiscal years

(Modified accrual basis of accounting)

(Amounts expressed in thousands)

2013(2)

2012(2)

2011(2)

2010(1)

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

General fund Nonspendable 182$ 201$ 146$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Restricted 215,711 93,225 149,515 - - - - - - - Unassigned - - - - - - - - - - Reserved - - - 126,092 8,570 12,030 9,970 8,276 13,243 13,099

Total general fund 215,893$ 93,426$ 149,661$ 126,092$ 8,570$ 12,030$ 9,970$ 8,276$ 13,243$ 13,099$

All other governmental funds

Nonspendable 157$ 219$ 135$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Restricted 43,973 38,044 42,680 - - - - - - - Assigned 1,074 535 - - - - - - - - Unassigned (274) (277) - - - - - - -

Reserved - - - 6,397 8,179 10,305 20,113 23,293 27,158 22,110 Unreserved - - - - 725 858 799 872 889 1,694

Total all other governmental funds 45,204$ 38,524$ 42,538$ 6,397$ 8,904$ 11,163$ 20,912$ 24,165$ 28,047$ 23,804$

(1) The increase in reserved fund balance in the general fund was due to the issuance of the Series 2009, Series 2010, and Series 2013 Bonds to be used to finance the costs of constructing and maintaining certain streets and highways in the County. See Note J & K.(2) RTC has chosen to present fund balances prospectively in accordance with the implementation of GASB No. 54.

113

Page 131: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

Last ten fiscal years

(Modified accrual basis of accounting)

(Amounts expressed in thousands)

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

Revenues Motor vehicle fuel tax 41,828$ 35,319$ 29,385$ 21,835$ 19,177$ 18,106$ 17,900$ 17,672$ 17,257$ 16,669$ Public transportation tax 8,459 7,726 4,250 1,170 3,521 4,194 4,437 4,473 4,129 3,703 Impact fees 8,598 596 11,226 1,076 13,368 28,603 15,898 29,416 20,532 27,793 Passenger fares 693 683 686 680 616 514 471 487 418 316 Investment income 207 1,085 556 631 591 1,226 1,434 669 1,119 133 Reimbursements 716 1,168 2,162 2,856 2,277 2,253 1,920 2,049 2,849 1,124 Rental income - - - - 27 24 21 21 89 181 Planning, operating and capital grants 12,125 5,866 5,118 5,123 3,696 6,217 14,445 14,078 15,778 16,668 Miscellaneous income 213 263 380 362 - - - - - -

Total revenues 72,839 52,706 53,763 33,733 43,273 61,137 56,526 68,865 62,171 66,587

Expenditures

Streets and highways 90,760 85,533 89,024 64,521 49,700 64,839 56,644 74,433 56,051 56,069 Transportation services 6,247 5,945 6,358 6,712 6,376 6,434 6,364 5,589 5,823 4,916 Metropolitan planning 2,725 3,357 2,043 2,032 941 1,064 1,110 1,349 853 1,491 Capital outlay 1,898 124 711 814 126 3,422 531 2,770 2,202 932 Debt service

Principal 5,788 5,438 - 2,000 - - 5,000 - - - Interest 12,497 13,223 7,662 2,458 24 - 249 - - - Debt service fees & fiscal charges 36 22 886 2,504 - - - - - -

Total expenditures 119,951 113,642 106,684 81,041 57,167 75,759 69,898 84,141 64,929 63,408

EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES

OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (47,112) (60,936) (52,921) (47,308) (13,894) (14,622) (13,372) (15,276) (2,758) 3,179

Other financing sources (uses)

Transfers in 225 338 246 4,193 6,173 6,900 6,800 6,419 5,300 4,122 Debt issuance(1) 165,000 - 90,000 179,567 2,000 - - - - - Line of credit - - - - - - 5,000 - - - Bond premium 11,023 - 340 162 - - - - - - Bond discount - - - (155) - - - - - - Sale of capital assets 10 - - 5 2 34 12 9 - -

Total other financing sources (uses) 176,258 338 90,586 183,772 8,175 6,934 11,812 6,428 5,300 4,122

NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 129,146$ (60,598)$ 37,665$ 136,464$ (5,719)$ (7,688)$ (1,560)$ (8,848)$ 2,542$ 7,301$

DEBT SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE

OF NONCAPITAL EXPENDITURES 15.5% 16.5% 8.1% 8.7% 0.0% N/A 7.6% N/A N/A N/A

(1) Proceeds from the issuance of debt are detailed in Note J & K.

114

Page 132: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Motor Regional Regional Public

Fiscal Vehicle Road Impact Road Impact Transportation

Year Fuel Tax Fee Credits(1)

Fees Tax Total

2013 41,827,886$ 7,470,788$ 1,126,781$ 8,459,319$ 58,884,774$

2012 35,318,650 346,025 249,938 7,726,463 43,641,076

2011 29,385,293 10,730,150 496,279 4,250,000 44,861,722

2010 21,834,666 625,828 450,167 1,170,088 24,080,749

2009 19,176,895 12,076,652 1,291,729 3,520,844 36,066,120

2008 18,106,105 23,694,550 4,908,909 4,193,612 50,903,176

2007 17,899,967 8,308,516 7,589,779 4,436,900 38,235,162

2006 17,672,092 24,466,587 4,949,593 4,473,229 51,561,501

2005 17,257,143 11,497,397 9,034,697 4,129,186 41,918,423

2004 16,669,353 20,431,599 7,361,662 3,703,313 48,165,927

Change2004-2013 150.9% -63.4% -84.7% 128.4% 22.3%

(1) Regional Road Impact Fee Credits are non-cash revenue

(Modified accrual basis of accounting)

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

REVENUES BY SOURCE, GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

Last ten fiscal years

115

Page 133: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Federal

Public Operating

Fiscal Transportation Passenger Government Bus Investment

Year Tax Fares (1)

Grant Advertising Income Miscellaneous(6)

Total

2013 12,926,595$ 5,959,133$ 3,989,322$ 277,131$ 35,051$ 512,661$ 23,699,893$ 2012 12,472,313 5,916,656 3,482,964 347,714 320,859 466,834 23,007,340 2011 15,182,174 5,738,460 9,814,365 422,428 70,699 1,361,740 (5) 32,589,866 2010 17,851,440 6,024,823 7,476,152 435,904 191,250 1,030,407 (4) 33,009,976 2009 17,604,218 7,012,490 3,119,847 424,318 346,585 2,848,304 (3) 31,355,762 2008 20,968,058 7,317,791 2,982,700 488,475 480,675 497,117 32,734,816 2007 22,184,498 7,163,343 3,251,274 507,174 500,383 2,338,258 (2) 35,944,930 2006 22,366,143 6,908,380 3,940,388 382,349 184,816 556,985 34,339,061 2005 20,645,928 6,263,832 3,666,079 330,133 210,634 529,445 31,646,051 2004 18,516,564 5,967,179 3,399,789 219,595 59,522 473,302 28,635,951

Change2004-2012 -30.2% -0.1% 17.3% 26.2% -41.1% 8.3% -17.2%

(1) Passenger single ride adult fare increased: from $0.30 to $0.60 in August 1993 from $0.60 to $1.00 in August 1995 from $1.00 to $1.25 in November 2000 from $1.25 to $1.50 in February 2003 from $1.50 to $1.65 in August 2005 from $1.65 to $1.70 in August 2006 from $1.70 to $1.75 in August 2007 from $1.75 to $2.00 in May 2008(2) Includes one time cash out of membership interest in EIG Mutual Holding Co., $1,815,720.

(3) Includes Citicenter gain on sale of $2,463,637. The Citicenter transit station was sold to the City of Reno Redevelopment Agency on 8/6/2008.

(4) Includes FTA residual value of $426,604 on the Citicenter property sold to the City of Reno. The residual value was applied towards the 4th Street Station construction.

(5) Includes NV Energy Incentive Program & Sure Bet Program rebate of $815,340 for Solar, Lighting, and HVAC ARRA grant projects

(6) Includes rental income and gain on sale of assets.

(Accrual basis of accounting)

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

REVENUES BY SOURCE, PROPRIETARY FUNDS

Last ten fiscal years

116

Page 134: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Value of Credits % of Total Value of Credits % of Total

Certificate Holders Issued Rank Value Issued Rank Value

Kiley Ranch Communities 3,743,021$ 1 50.1% -$ - 0.0%

Nevada Tri-Partners 1,835,031 2 24.6% 10,109,125 1 49.6%

Pulte Homes 1,262,200 3 16.9% - 0.0%

RTM-HRCF Sky Vista, LLC 630,536 4 8.4% - 0.0%

Reno Corporate Center LLC - - 0.0% 3,925,535 2 19.2%

Double Diamond Ranch - - 0.0% 1,271,116 3 6.2%

Barker Coleman Construction - - 0.0% 1,145,651 4 5.6%

Sommerset Development - - 0.0% 1,000,000 5 4.9%

Loeb Enterprises - - 0.0% 615,000 6 3.0%

Reynen & Bardis Development - - 0.0% 560,079 7 2.7%

Trammel Crow Construction - - 0.0% 502,292 8 2.5%

Rialto LLC - - 0.0% 450,000 9 2.2%

Spanish Springs Associates - - 0.0% 287,429 10 1.4%

Total Ten Largest Credit Recipients 7,470,788$ 100.0% 19,866,227$ 97.3%

Total Other Credit Recipients - 0.0% 434,728 2.1%

Total Other Credit Adjustments - 0.0% 130,644 0.6%

Total Impact Fee Credits Issued 7,470,788$ 100.0% 20,431,599$ 100.0%

years from the original date of issuance of a credit book.

apply for a Regional Road Impact Fee Credit. The RTC RRIF administrator determines which capital improvements and/or right-of-way dedications are eligible

for credits and what the amount of the credit shall be for each. Credits are in the form of a RRIF Credit Certificate. RRIF credits may be used by the Developer

of Record to pay for up to 100% of the Regional Road Impact Fees otherwise due under the Regional Road Impact Fee System. Unused credits expire twenty

Any person except a unit of government who constructs all or part of a capital improvement included in the Regional CIP or offers a dedication of land may

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

PRINCIPAL REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE CREDIT RECIPIENTS(1)

YEARS 2013 AND 2004

2013 2004

117

Page 135: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Total VMT units issued in Reno 27,454 500 42,931 - 50,833 110,375 38,953 171,250

Total VMT units issued outside Reno 27,018 1,047 34,808 4,875 28,136 73,994 24,824 31,129

Total VMT units 54,472 1,547 77,739 4,875 78,969 184,369 63,777 202,379

has chosen to present it prospectively in accordance with the implementation of GASB No. 44.

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) UNITS(1)

Last eight fiscal years

(1) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) are the base used to calculate the value of Regional Road Impact Fees (RRIF) credits. A VMT is a unit of travel demand consisting of a motorvehicle traveling for one mile. Impact Fee Credits are determined by the number of VMT's per unit of development. Prior to 2006, the RTC did not present this schedule and

118

Page 136: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

RTC RTC Washoe Washoe RTC RTC

RTC Washoe Direct Direct County County Direct Direct

Direct County Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Impact Fee Impact Fee

Sales Tax Sales Tax Fuel Tax Fuel Tax Fuel Tax Fuel Tax in Reno Outside Reno

Rate(1)

Rate Rate(2)

Index(3)

Rate Index (3) Rate

(4) Rate

2013 0.375% 7.725% 0.2198$ 0.03230$ 0.3123$ 0.03740$ $216/VMT $227/VMT2012 0.375% 7.725% 0.1875 0.02640 0.2749 0.03052 216/VMT 227/VMT2011 0.375% 7.725% 0.1611 0.02608 0.2443 0.03022 216/VMT 227/VMT2010 0.375% 7.725% 0.1350 0.02940 0.2141 0.03394 216/VMT 227/VMT2009 0.375% 7.375% 0.1056 0.00290 0.1801 0.00494 185/VMT 198/VMT2008 0.375% 7.375% 0.1027 0.00256 0.1752 0.00437 158/VMT 173/VMT2007 0.375% 7.375% 0.1002 0.00256 0.1708 0.00436 126/VMT 139/VMT2006 0.375% 7.375% 0.0976 0.00257 0.1665 0.00438 126/VMT 135/VMT2005 0.375% 7.375% 0.0950 0.00257 0.1621 0.00438 123/VMT 135/VMT2004 0.375% 7.375% 0.0925 0.00247 0.1577 0.00421 123/VMT 135/VMT

(1)

(2)

(3)

Rates shown reflect the annual change in the index.(4)

Source: Nevada Department of Taxation and Regional Transportation Commission

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX RATES

Last ten fiscal years

The RTC's sales tax rate may only be changed with the approval of the Board of County Commissioners and enacted

Fiscal

Year

percent or (ii) the average percentage of the increase in the Consumer Price Index for West Urban Consumers for thepreceding 5 years. At the November 2008 election, County voters approved RTC5 and the State Legislature enacted

for mass transit or the construction of public roads. Effective July 1, 2003, the Board of County CommissionersState legislation. Effective November 1, 1982, the Board of County Commissioners imposed a sales tax of 1/4 cent

and enacted State legislation. In 1965, a $0.01 cent per gallon fuel tax was levied for the purpose of constructing

imposed an additional 1/8 cent sales tax.The RTC's motor vehicle fuel tax rate may only be changed with the approval of the Board of County Commissioners

approved then made permanent in September of 1995. Reference note 3 below. Annual rates reflect year-to-year cumulative indexing.per gallon and in 1982 to $0.04 cents per gallon. In April of 1994, a temporary additional $0.05 cents per gallon wasand improving the street and highway transportation facilities within Washoe County. In 1971, it was increased to $0.02

was established to allow automatic inflationary adjustments to the fees. Rates shown are based on a single-family detached home.participating local governments. The 2003 passage of WC-2 allowed for the indexing of impact fees and NRS 278B.225by State Legislation. RTC impact fee rates may only be changed with the approval of ordinances adopted by all

the bill which revised the indexing provisions for the 9-cent motor vehicle fuel tax. The county was thereby authorized toimpose additional taxes on motor vehicle fuel and special fuels for the benefit of the Commission, and provided for annual

adjusted rate of 10.5621 cents per gallon. The PPI adjusted rate went into effect with April 2010 fuel tax collections.

The imposition of an impact fee for the construction of new roads and to make capacity improvements is established

increases in such taxes to be calculated using a formula based on (i) the lesser of 7.8% or (ii) a rolling 10-year average of thechanges in the Producer Price Index for Street and Highway Construction. The PPI adjustments were imposed on the CPI

Effective October 1, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners approved fuel tax indexing which imposed additional newtaxes on motor vehicle fuel. On the first day of each fiscal year, motor vehicle fuel tax was increased by (i) the lesser of 4.5

119

Page 137: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE

Last ten fiscal years

(Amounts expressed in thousands; except per capita amount)

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

Governmental activities

Revenue bonds 423,341$ 264,129$ 269,567$ 179,567$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Line of credit - - - - 2,000 - 5,000 - - -

Business-type activities

Medium-term financing - - - - - - 50 50 50 50

423,341$ 264,129$ 269,567$ 179,567$ 2,000$ -$ 5,050$ 50$ 50$ 50$

Percentage of personal

income 2.3153% 1.4798% 1.5022% 1.0307% 0.0108% 0.0000% 0.0275% 0.0003% 0.0003% 0.0003%

Per capita 0.98$ 0.62$ 0.64$ 0.43$ 0.00$ -$ 0.012$ 0.000$ 0.000$ 0.000$

123 for personal income and population data.

Total primary government

Details regarding the RTC's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics on page

120

Page 138: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Percent

Presently Applicable

Debt Self-Supporting to Washoe Applicable

Outstanding Debt County (1)

Net Debt

DirectWashoe County

Governmental activity bonds 119,313$ -$ 100% 119,313$ Revenue bonds(2) 42,132 42,132 100% - Special assessment bonds(3) 9,011 9,011 100% -

Total Direct Debt 170,456 51,143 119,313

OverlappingWashoe County School District 529,914 - 100% 529,914 Reno-Sparks Convention & Visitors Authority 122,133 122,133 100% - City of Reno 41,440 - 100% 41,440 City of Reno supported by specific revenue 377,710 377,710 100% - City of Reno - Special Assessment bonds(3) 18,935 18,935 100% - City of Sparks 3,890 - 100% 3,890 City of Sparks - Sewer and Utility bonds 47,811 47,811 100% - Incline Village General Improvement District 16,216 16,216 100% - State of Nevada 1,921,545 551,925 14.95% 204,758

Total Overlapping Debt 3,079,594 1,134,730 780,002

Total Direct and Overlapping debt 3,250,050$ 1,185,873$ 899,315$

(1) Based on FY 2012-13 assessed valuation in the respective jurisdiction.(2) Revenue bonds are not general obligation, but are special limited obligation of the County payable solely from the pledged revenue.

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

COMPUTATION OF GENERAL OBLIGATION

As of June 30, 2013

(3) Special assessment bonds are not general obligations of Washoe County, or of the Cities of Reno and Sparks. If however, the special assessmentscollected, with all other available resources were insufficient to meet debt service requirements on these bonds, the respective bond ordinances

require that the deficiency be made up with the governments' general funds. None of this debt is attributable to the RTC.

(amounts expressed in thousands)

DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT

Name of Governmental Unit

121

Page 139: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Public

Transportation

Tax(3)

Limitations(4)

Total Net Total Net Revenues

Total Washoe Pledged Pledged Public in Excess Bond Bond

Debt RTC County Fuel Tax Transportation of Debt Coverage Coverage Excess

Principal Interest Service 9¢ + Index(2)

5.35¢ + 1¢ Revenues Tax Revenues Service Actual Required Coverage

2013 $ 5,788,000 $ 12,496,722 $ 18,284,722 $ 41,827,886 N/A $ 41,827,886 $ 7,128,638 $ 30,671,802 229% 125% 104%2012 5,438,000 13,222,764 18,660,764 35,318,650 N/A 35,318,650 6,732,925 23,390,811 189% 125% 64%2011 - 7,661,705 7,661,705 29,385,293 N/A 29,385,293 6,477,392 28,200,980 368% 125% 243%2010 - 2,415,291 2,415,291 20,775,496 N/A 20,775,496 N/A 18,360,205 860% 125% 735%2009 N/A N/A N/A 18,165,095 11,341,246 29,506,341 N/A 29,506,341 N/A N/A N/A2008 N/A N/A N/A 18,106,105 11,332,487 29,438,592 N/A 29,438,592 N/A N/A N/A2007 N/A N/A N/A 17,899,967 11,209,549 29,109,516 N/A 29,109,516 N/A N/A N/A2006 N/A N/A N/A 17,672,092 10,847,948 28,520,040 N/A 28,520,040 N/A N/A N/A2005 N/A N/A N/A 17,257,143 7,998,840 25,255,983 N/A 25,255,983 N/A N/A N/A2004 N/A N/A N/A 16,669,353 7,837,472 24,506,825 N/A 24,506,825 N/A N/A N/A

(1)

in 1989. In April 1994, the 4¢ was raised to 9¢. In 1983, the 1¢ rate was implemented for Washoe County roads.(2)

The PPI rate went into effect January 1, 2010 and is adjusted on July 1, annually.(3)

additional taxes in pledged revenues for the remaining term of the 2010H bonds by adoption of a resolution or ordinance to include such tax.(4)

a. Nevada Revised Statutes 373.130 states that revenues from vehicle fuel tax must be adequate to meet the payment of outstanding debt as it becomes due.

to be issued (escluding any reserves therefor).(5)

of Chapter 501 at the State Legislature, additional taxes were imposed on motor vehicle fuel and special fuels for the benefit of the RTC which provided for annual increases

Debt Service

b. Washoe County Bond Ordinance requires that the net pledged revenues derived in any twelve consecutive months of the last eighteen months of Fiscal Year immediately

using a formula based on the lesser of (i) 7.8% or (ii) a rolling 10-year average of the changes in the Producer Price Index for Street and Highway Construction.

The following limitations on bond coverage are calculated in these columns:

The bond covenant provisions of the 2010 Series H revenue bonds identify as net pledged revenues sales taxes imposed at a rate of one-eighth of one percent (.0125%) andincome derived from any additional Sales Tax imposed by the County should the RTC Board choose to include the additional tax in pledged revenues. The RTC Board may elect to include

The bond covenant provisions of the 2009 and 2010 Series A,B,C,D,E and F revenue bonds identify as net pledged revenues motor vehicle fuel taxes consistingof the 9¢ per gallon motor vehicle fuel tax together with prior annual increases to that base rate calculated as the lesser of: (i) 4.5% increase or (ii) the averagepercentage of the increase in the Consumer Price Index for West Urban Consumers for the preceding 5 years. Pursuant to a ballot measure in November 2008 and subsequent enactment

Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax(1)

Bond Coverage(5)

The amounts of these taxes have increased over the years. In 1977, the rates were 2¢ and 1½¢. In 1982, these were raised to 4¢ and 1½¢. In 1983, they were increased again tothe level of 4¢ and 3¢. In 1986 the 3¢ motor vehicle fuel tax previously distributed to the RTC for bond covenant provisions was distributed by the State of Nevadadirectly to Washoe County and the Cities of Reno and Sparks, as provided for in Chapter 365 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. The 3¢ rate was increased to 4.28¢ in 1988 and 5.35¢

Fiscal

b. Excess Coverage is equal to the difference between Bond Coverage – Actual and Bond Coverage – Required.

preceeding the date of the issuance of such additional Parity Securities shall have been at least sufficent to pay an amount equal to 125% of the combinedmaximum annual principal and interest requirrements of the outstanding bonds and any other oustanding parity securities of the County and the parity securities proposed

The Actual Bond Coverage and Excess Coverage are calculated as follows:a. Bond Coverage – Actual is equal to the Total Net Pledged Fuel Tax Revenues divided by Total Debt Service.

Year

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

PLEDGED REVENUE BOND COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS

Last ten fiscal years

122

Page 140: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Per Capita Total Unemployment Construction Number of

Fiscal Personal Personal Median Labor Rate(4)

Activity - New Family

Year Population(1)

Income(2)

Income(2)

Age(3)

Force(4)

(Percent) Total Value(5)

Units(5)

2013 434,120 18,284,145$ 47$ 37.6 219,550 9.8% 126,468$ 79 2012 427,704 (6) 17,849,009$ (6) 45$ (6) 37.4 (6) 222,532 12.3% 95,876$ 83 2011 421,593 17,944,975$ 49$ (6) 37.2 (6) 225,481 13.2% 67,721$ 55 2010 417,379 17,421,365$ 47$ (6) 37.0 (6) 221,954 13.6% 55,952$ 36 2009 416,632 18,550,337$ 45$ 36.4 224,089 11.6% 85,407$ 103 2008 423,833 19,392,856$ 46$ 36.5 221,785 6.8% 202,519$ 240 2007 406,335 18,378,021$ 44$ (6) 34.5 220,337 4.5% 225,085$ 557 2006 398,236 17,510,758$ 43$ (6) 36.5 218,144 4.0% 307,686$ 851 2005 390,863 16,700,497$ 42$ (6) 36.1 210,650 4.0% 368,356$ 1,113 2004 381,377 15,532,986$ 41$ 35.1 209,715 4.2% 345,640$ 1,009

Sources:(1) Annual population for years 2007 and prior: Nevada Workforce Informer, Data Analysis 2010 US Census-Nevada. For years 2008 through 2012: Governor Certified Population of Nevada's Counties, Cities and Towns 2000 to 2012 with 2010 Census. 2013: Washoe County Community Development, with projected growth rate applied to the 2010 US Census.(2) For FY 2008 and prior: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis For FY 2009 through FY 2013: Washoe County Community Development Demographic Information(3) For FY 2001 through FY 2007: Nevada State Demographer FY 2001-2007 For FY 2008: Dempgraphics USA For FY 2009 through FY 2013: Center for Regional Studies, University of Nevada, Reno(4) Total represents the average labor force during the fiscal year. NevadaState Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation (DETR).(5) Washoe County Building and Safety Department.(6) Prior fiscal year information has been restated to reflect actual amounts rather than estimates.

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS

Last ten fiscal years

(Dollars Expressed in Thousands)

123

Page 141: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Percentage Percentage

of Total of Total

County County

Employer Employees(1)

Rank Employment Employees(1)

Rank Employment

Washoe County School District 7,750 1 3.89% 6,750 1 3.45%University of Nevada, Reno 4,250 2 2.13% 3,750 2 1.91%Renown Medical Center(2) 2,750 3 1.38% 2,250 5 1.15%Washoe County 2,250 4 1.13% 2,750 3 1.40%Peppermill Hotel Casino-Reno 2,250 5 1.13% - - -International Game Technology 2,250 6 1.13% 2,750 4 1.40%Silver Legacy Resort Casino 1,750 7 0.88% 2,250 6 1.15%Atlantis Casino Resort 1,750 8 0.88% - - -Grand Sierra Resort and Casino 1,250 9 0.63% - - -Eldorado Hotel & Casino 1,250 10 0.63% 1,750 9 0.89%St. Mary's - - - 1,750 7 0.89%Reno Hilton - - - 1,750 8 0.89%Circus Circus Casinos, Inc. Reno - - - 1,750 10 0.89% Total Washoe County CoveredEmployment 199,079 195,813

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS

Current year and nine years ago

(1) Nevada Revised Statutes Chapter 612 stipulates that actual employment for individual employers may not be published. The Nevada Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation publishes employee counts in ranges of 500. The number of employees are estimated using the midpoint.

(2) In 2007, Washoe Medical Center became Renown Medical Center.

December, 2012 December, 2003

124

Page 142: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

FULL TIME EQUIVALENT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT

Department 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

Executive 2.00 6.50 7.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 7.00 7.00 7.00

Administrative services 7.50 10.50 12.00 14.50 14.50 14.25 13.75 14.25 12.75 9.50

Marketing/Communications(3) 0.00 6.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 7.00 8.00 7.00 8.00 8.00

Finance 12.00 16.00 15.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 15.00 15.00

Engineering/Facilities maintenance(2) 17.00 20.00 28.00 31.25 31.25 31.25 31.25 31.25 30.25 30.00

Metropolitan Planning Organization 12.00 9.00 9.00 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50

Public transportation and Operations(1) 20.50 24.50 15.50 15.50 15.50 15.00 14.00 17.00 13.00 11.00

Total Budgeted Employees(4) 71.00 92.50 93.00 104.25 104.25 102.50 102.00 103.00 96.50 91.00

Total Actual Employees(5) 64.00 66.50 73.75 84.25 94.25 97.75 97.25 95.75 87.75 85.50

(4) Source: RTC Finance Department Budget documents

(5) Source: Payroll FTE count as of June 30th.

(3) In FY 2012, Marketing department was dissolved. Staff moved to Planning and Public Transportation and Operattions department.

(2) In FY 2012, Facilities Maintenance moved from Engineering to Public Transportation and Operations department.

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

Last ten fiscal years

(1) In FY2012, Public Transportation department became known as Public Transportation and Operations department.

125

Page 143: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Fiscal Year Fleet Size(2)

Revenue

Miles

Revenue

Hours Passengers

Bus

Operators

Maintenance

Personnel Other Total FTE's

2013 82 2,817,697 249,569 8,050,950 168.0 29.0 18.5 215.5

2012 82 2,851,407 252,827 7,973,480 153.5 25.0 19.0 197.5

2011 92 2,878,008 251,861 7,688,345 160.0 35.0 20.5 215.5

2010 79 2,931,074 246,285 7,474,905 170.0 35.0 21.5 226.52009 78 3,236,164 263,704 8,449,134 169.5 31.0 24.0 224.52008 81 3,613,707 288,661 9,056,533 191.5 40.0 24.0 255.52007 81 3,600,790 288,418 8,841,419 192.0 41.0 27.0 260.02006 79 3,529,385 280,317 8,738,397 184.0 40.0 27.0 251.02005 79 3,440,268 268,582 8,001,999 187.0 35.0 24.0 246.02004 84 3,161,217 251,168 7,528,805 160.0 36.0 25.0 221.0

(1) All Operating Statistics are actual numbers.

(2) Includes Peak, Spares, and Contingency. Prior year restated to reflect actual numbers.

Full Time Equivalent Employees (FTE)

Last ten fiscal years

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

RIDE OPERATING STATISTICS

126

Page 144: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Fleet Size

Revenue

Miles

Revenue

Hours Passengers

Van

Operators

Maintenance

Personnel

Operations

Personnel Total FTE's

2013 50 1,341,109 82,637 232,776 42.0 5.0 12.0 59.0

2012 45 1,281,359 81,119 222,593 42.0 5.0 12.0 59.0

2011 45 1,220,072 80,185 213,804 45.5 5.0 14.0 64.5

2010 45 1,262,611 79,611 221,609 42.0 4.0 13.0 59.0

2009 50 1,415,581 90,074 238,142 45.5 4.0 15.0 64.5

2008 50 1,415,418 94,692 241,799 53.0 5.0 15.0 73.0

2007 46 1,453,393 93,932 247,218 56.0 5.0 15.0 76.0

2006 46 1,382,057 89,919 242,017 54.0 3.0 18.0 75.0

2005 45 1,406,714 91,654 246,807 58.0 4.0 18.0 80.0

2004 43 1,389,072 87,344 237,138 54.0 5.0 17.0 76.0

All Operating Statistics are actual numbers.

Fiscal

Year

Full Time Equivalent Employees (FTE)

Last ten fiscal years

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

ACCESS OPERATING STATISTICS

127

Page 145: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

CAPITAL ASSET INFORMATION(1)

As of June 30, 2013

Year(2)

2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

Facilities

2050 Villanova Drive, Reno NV 89502 1984 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

600 Sutro Street, Reno NV 89512 1993 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1105 Terminal Way, Reno NV 89502 2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

40 East 4th Street, Reno NV 89501 1987 - - - - - 1 1 1 1 1

1421 Victorian Avenue, Sparks NV 89432 2009 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - -

200 East 4th Street, Reno NV 89501 2011 1 1 1 - - - - - - -

Other assets

Number of RIDE Passenger Shelters(3) 111 111 105 106 99 97 80 80 - -

Number of RIDE revenue vehicles (fleet)(4) 82 81 82 75 78 81 81 79 79 84

Number of ACCESS revenue vehicles (fleet)(4) 50 45 45 45 50 50 46 46 45 43

Number of Maintenance & Operations staff vehicle (5) 29 31 32 33 33 33 28 29 33 29

(1) More information about capital assets can be found in the notes to the financial statements.(2) Fiscal year facility was acquired or construction completed.(3) Shelter information includes only installed shelters and RAPID stations. Information not readily available prior to FY2006.(4) Revenue vehicles include active fleet only. Active fleet consists of Peak, spares, and contigency vehicles.(5) Staff vehicles include RIDE, ACCESS, and RTC support vehicles.

128

Page 146: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

COMPLIANCE SECTION

Page 147: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

AUDITOR'S COMMENTS June 30, 2013

STATUTE COMPLIANCE

The required disclosure on compliance with Nevada Revised Statutes and the Nevada Administrative Code is contained in Note B to the financial statements.

PROGRESS ON PRIOR YEAR STATUTE COMPLIANCE There were no potential statute violations for the year ended June 30, 2012. PRIOR YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS

Corrective action was taken on all findings included in the prior year report. CURRENT YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS

There were no current year recommendations.

130

Page 148: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS

BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

To the Commissioners of the Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United State of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of Regional Transportation Commission, Reno, Sparks, and Washoe County, Nevada (RTC), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2013, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise RTC’s basic financial statements and have issued our report thereon dated November 26, 2013. Internal Control over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered RTC’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of RTC’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the RTC’s internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or, significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.

131

Page 149: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether RTC’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. Reno, Nevada November 26, 2013

132

Page 150: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM AND REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE

REQUIRED BY OMB CIRUCLAR A-133 To the Commissioners of the Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program We have audited the Regional Transportation Commission’s, Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada (RTC’s) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the U. S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the RTC’s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2013. The RTC’s major federal programs are identified in the Summary of Auditor’s Results section of the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. Management’s Responsibility The RTC’s management is responsible for compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to its federal programs. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of the RTC’s major federal programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the RTC’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the RTC’s compliance.

133

Page 151: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Opinion on Each Major Federal Program In our opinion, the Regional Transportation Commission, Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2013. Report on Internal Control over Compliance Management of the RTC is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the RTC’s internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the RTC’s internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of the internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of OMB Circular A-133. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Reno, Nevada November 26, 2013

134

Page 152: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Grant / Grant Federal

C.F.D.A. Agreement Award Expenditures

Number Number Amount 2013

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Transit Administration

Direct Award

Federal Transit Cluster

Federal Transit - Capital Investment Grants 20.500 #NV-04-0009 3,627,880$ 193,868$

Federal Transit - Capital Investment Grants 20.500 #NV-04-0014 615,250 53,307

Federal Transit - Capital Investment Grants 20.500 #NV-04-0016 5,107,876 4,269,812

9,351,006 4,516,987

Passed through State of Nevada Department of Transportation

Federal Transit Cluster

Federal Transit - Capital Investment Grants 20.500 #PR388-08-802 505,440 505,440

9,856,446 5,022,427

Direct Award

Federal Transit - Urbanized Area Formula Grant 20.507 #NV-90-0055 5,147,348 122,025

Federal Transit - Urbanized Area Formula Grant 20.507 #NV-90-0057 5,550,150 300,928

Federal Transit - Urbanized Area Formula Grant 20.507 #NV-90-0063 5,398,020 8,021

Federal Transit - Urbanized Area Formula Grant 20.507 #NV-90-0066 5,078,826 467,246

Federal Transit - Urbanized Area Formula Grant 20.507 #NV-90-0069 6,046,167 3,028,488

Federal Transit - Urbanized Area Formula Grant 20.507 #NV-90-0073 5,470,989 547,099

Federal Transit - Urbanized Area Formula Grant 20.507 #NV-95-0006 23,110,000 1,963,765

55,801,500 6,437,572

65,657,946 11,459,999

Direct Award

Public Transportation Research

Public Transportation Research 20.514 #NV-26-0003 978,300 172,806

978,300 172,806

Direct Award

Transit Services Programs Cluster

Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 20.516 #NV-37-0013 69,534 2,623

Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 20.516 #NV-37-0017 237,342 10,045

Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 20.516 #NV-37-0020 272,267 26,848

Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 20.516 #NV-37-0023 173,254 42,439

752,397 81,955

New Freedom Program 20.521 #NV-57-0011 111,676 37,948

New Freedom Program 20.521 #NV-57-0012 112,253 73,795

223,929 111,743

976,326 193,698

Direct Award

Transit Investments for Greenhouse Gas and Energy Reduction or "TIGGER" Grants

Capital Assistance for Reducing Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions 20.523 #NV-88-0001 4,650,523 87,676

4,650,523 87,676

Passed through State of Nevada Department of Transportation

Metropolitan Transportation Planning Grant 20.505 #P368-11-802 434,017 7,919

434,017 7,919

72,697,112 11,922,098

Total Transit Services Programs Cluster

Total Federal Transit Technical Studies

Total Federal Transit Administration

Total Capital Assistance for Reducing Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS Year ended June 30, 2013

Total Public Transportation Safety Research

Total Capital Investment

Total Urbanized Area Formula

Program Title

Total Federal Transit Cluster

135

Page 153: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Grant / Grant Federal

C.F.D.A. Agreement Award Expenditures

Number Number Amount 2013

Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS Year ended June 30, 2013

Program Title

Federal Highway Administration

Passed through State of Nevada Department of Transportation

Highway Planning and Construction Cluster

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #P401-11-804 900,000 89,458

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #P491-12-804 500,000 292,977

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #P461-07-063 8,203,569 382,438

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #P156-11-063 1,209,250 462,681

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #PR351-12-063 28,874,190 1,618,948

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #PR092-04-016 1,026,000 44,543

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #PR032-12-016 450,000 16,960

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #P403-11-804 2,589,026 223,482

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #P517-12-804 3,547,802 819,222

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #P515-12-802 400,000 91,944

Highway Planning and Construction Grant 20.205 #PR421-12-063 1,052,632 373,336

48,752,469 4,415,989

48,752,469 4,415,989

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Passed through State of Nevada Department of Public Safety

State and Community Highway Safety Cluster

State and Community Highway Safety Grant 20.600 #210-PS-2 47,000$ 35,000$

47,000 35,000

47,000 35,000

121,496,581 16,373,087

TOTAL EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS: 121,496,581$ 16,373,087$

The notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards are an integral part of this schedule.

Total Federal Highway Administration

Total U.S. Department of Transportation

Total National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Total Highway Safety Cluster

Total Highway Planning and Construction Cluster

136

Page 154: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission

Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

NOTES TO THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS

Year ended June 30, 2013

NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the activity of federal financial assistance to the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements.

NOTE B – SUBRECIPIENT PASS-THROUGHS

Of the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards, the RTC provided federal awards to subrecipients from the Transit Services Programs Cluster as follows:

Program Title CFDA No.

Amount Provided to

Subrecipients

Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 20.516 61,345$

New Freedom Program 20.521 100,883

Total Amount Provided to Subrecipients 162,228$

137

Page 155: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS

June 30, 2013

Section I – Summary of Auditor’s Results: • Kafoury, Armstrong & Co. issued an unmodified opinion on the financial statements of the Regional

Transportation Commission, Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada for the year ended June 30, 2013. • No significant deficiencies or material weaknesses were disclosed during the audit of the financial

statements.

• The audit disclosed no instances of noncompliance, which were material to the financial statements of the Regional Transportation Commission, Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada.

• No significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the internal control over a major federal award

program were disclosed. • Kafoury, Armstrong & Co. issued an unmodified opinion on compliance for major federal award programs

of the Regional Transportation Commission, Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada. • There were no audit findings relative to a major federal award program for the Regional Transportation

Commission, Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada required to be reported under section .510(a) of OMB Circular A-133.

• The Regional Transportation Commission, Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada, had two major

programs for the year ended June 30, 2013, as follows:

• Federal Transit Cluster: Federal Transit – Capital Investment Grants - CFDA 20.500 Federal Transit – Urbanized Area Formula Grant - CFDA 20.507

• Highway Planning and Construction Cluster: Highway Planning and Construction Grant - CFDA 20.205

• The dollar threshold used to distinguish between Type A and Type B programs for the year ended June 30, 2013 was $491,192.

• The Regional Transportation Commission, Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada did not qualify as a

low risk auditee for the year ended June 30, 2013 under the criteria set forth in section .530 of OMB Circular A-133.

Section II – Findings Relating to the Financial Statement Audit: There were no findings relating to the financial statement audit for the year ended June 30, 2013. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs for Major Federal Award Programs: There were no findings related to major federal award programs for the year ended June 30, 2013.

138

Page 156: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION · Regional Transportation Commission December 20, 2013 viii fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada

SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS

June 30, 2013

Prior Audit Findings for Major Federal Award Programs: There were no findings related to major federal award programs for the prior year.

139