Upload
cailin-burch
View
31
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Regions of the Canine Genome Associated with Osteosarcoma Identified by a Whole Genome Case-Control Association Study. Kenine E Comstock , Elinor Karlsson, Claire Wade, Evan T Keller, Eric Lander, Laurence Baker, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Regions of the Canine Genome Associated with Osteosarcoma Identified by a Whole Genome
Case-Control Association Study
Kenine E Comstock, Elinor Karlsson, Claire Wade, Evan T Keller, Eric Lander, Laurence Baker, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor & Broad Institute, Boston, USA
Osteosarcoma in pet dogs and humans
Common Features
1. Primary tumor occurs on weight bearing limbs
2. Tumor growth with an intact immune system
3. Similarities in histology4. Location of metastases5. Common environment
Differences
1. Age of onset2. Incidence in population
Dogs and humans: Similarities in cancer genetics
The first example: Renal cancer syndromeCanine Hereditary Multifocal Renal Cystadenocarcinoma and Nodular Dermatofibrosis (RCND)
•German Shepherds •Autosomal dominant•Similar in phenotype to human Birt-Hogg Dube syndrome.•We showed that mutations in the same gene in human and dogs were associated with both diseases.
RCND-affected
RCND-unaffected
Lingaas and Comstock, et al. Hum Mol Genet. 2003 12(23):3043-53
Cancer in dogs is highly breed-specific
Cancer Breed Increased risk
Hemangiosarcoma Golden Retriever 5
Lymphoma, T-cell Boxer 4
Melanoma Scottish Terrier 6
Mammary Tumor Springer Spaniel 5
Osteosarcoma Greyhound
Rottweiler
10
5
Advantages of canine models for mapping cancer genes
• Large families, inbred, good genealogical records, relatively short generation times
• Disease progression accelerated.
• Genetic similarity within breeds: cancer is associated with fewer mutations than in
the species as a whole.
Methods for mapping genes
1. Linkage mapping using families
Best for rare, high penetrance diseases
2. Association mapping
For complex traits
Compares cases vs controls
No need for families
Markers: SNPs
100,000 SNPs or more for humans
Only ~30,000 SNPs in dogs!
Can narrow associated regions to kilobases
Resources available for Canine Disease Gene Mapping
•7x Canine Genome Sequence-released July 2005*
•Comparative maps of human and dog chromosomes
•SNP mapping set
*Lindblad-Toh et al. Nature (2005) 438:803-19
2.5 million SNPs discovered (1 SNP/kb)
Boxer
Poodle
• SNP discovery in 11 breeds and 5 wild canids
Alaskan Malamute
English Shepherd
Bedlington TerrierBeagle
German Shepherd Italian Greyhound
Labrador Retriever Portuguese Waterdog Rottweiler
China gray wolfAlaska gray wolfIndia gray wolf
Spanish gray wolf
California Coyote
Dog SNP Chip for whole genome scans
Designed and tested by Michigan/Broad group
in collaboration with Affymetrix
~26,500 optimized SNP Mapping Set
Now commercially available
CoverageChromosome 1Mb ≥ 5 SNPs
Autosomes 97%
Chrom X 42%
Power analysis: Prediction of sample size needed
Trait Dogs Power (LOD>5)
Recessive 20 + 20 100%
Dominant 50 + 50 100%
5-fold risk 100 + 100 98%
*In humans, would need approx 800 + 800
*
Can we map real traits using this SNP marker set?
Yes! Power calculations appear correct
•Predicted low sample numbers work
• One significant associated region*Elinor Karlsson and Claire Wade, Broad Institute
Mendelian Trait
Co-Dominant Recessive Dominant
Cases+Controls 10+9 7+11 27+40
LOD 5 3 5
Region Size (kb) 800 800 300
Genes 1 7 3
Objectives:
1. To identify genes involved with osteosarcoma susceptibility in dogs
2. To map a complex trait using the new SNP set.
Large and giant breed dogs have a higher risk of osteosarcoma
Greyhound-5 to 10 XIrish WolfhoundGreat DaneScottish DeerhoundRhodesian RidgebackGreat PyreneesBorzoiSaint Bernard
Rottweiler-5 X increased riskLabrador RetrieverFlat-coated RetrieverGolden RetrieverMastiffBullmastiffNewfoundland
1) Mastiff-type breeds 2) Long-limbed breeds
Eligibility Criteria
Cases: Dogs diagnosed with osteosarcoma
Cases were confirmed by either radiography and/or by biopsy.
All cases are being confirmed by a single independent pathologist.
Controls: Healthy, cancer-free dogs
10 years and older for Greyhounds, 8 years and older for all other breeds.
Owners of control dogs are contacted regularly.
All dogs of a single breed in the study are unrelated through the grandparents.
Study participants enrolled
Table 1: Samples collected as of May 1, 2006
Breed Breed group OSA cases
Controls(8 years and older)
Rottweiler Mastiff 91 74
Golden retriever Mastiff 29 370
Leonberger Mastiff 26 51
Greyhound Long-limbed 82 151 (*10 yrs and older)
Irish Wolfhound Long-limbed 12 11
Great Dane Long-limbed 22 33
All other breeds NA 49 189
Haplotype Haplotype The series of alleles The series of alleles along a chromosome inherited by an along a chromosome inherited by an individual from one parent.individual from one parent.
Number of generations since common ancestor
Number of founders
Shared
Haplotypes
Within a breed
(Corgi-Corgi)
few few large
Between breeds
(Corgi-Irish wolfhound
many many small
Relationship between haplotype size and breed
Irish wolfhound
Corgi
Stage 1: OSA susceptibility gene mapping in each breed separately
We’ve started with Rottweilers:Searched genome for 0.5-1 Mb disease-associated haplotypes
1 /2M
b-1M
b
OSA+ OSA+
xx xx
Stage 2: Fine mapping across dog breeds within a breed groupAdd related breeds to narrow the region to a smaller, shared ancestral haplotype (~10-20kb). We are just getting started with this!
10-2
0kb
{ {Golden retriever
(OSA+)Leonberger
(OSA+)
“OSA”gene
Whole Genome Scan in Rottweilers:Whole Genome Scan in Rottweilers:
Like
lihoo
d of
an
asso
ciat
ion
Location in the genome
Regions associated with osteosarcoma in RottweilersRegions associated with osteosarcoma in Rottweilers-lo
g(1
0)
of
the
p-v
alu
e
• Localized to three haplotype blocks
• Association performed using Haploview
• p< 0.01 with 100,000 permutations.
A CB
SNPs SNPs grouped into 4 gamete “haplotype” blocks
Currently ongoing…
•Screening for mutations•Genome scan in greyhounds•Fine mapping in related breeds
Acknowledgements
Broad InstituteElinor KarlssonClaire WadeTara BiagiSara FrycNoriko TonomuraKerstin Lindblad-Toh
CollaboratorsFrode Lingaas (Oslo)Guillermo Couto (Ohio)Jaime Modiano (Denver)Elaine Ostrander (NHGRI)Bill Kisseberth (Ohio)Cheryl London (Ohio)Elizabeth McNiel (Minnesota)
MichiganSarah Mandelbaum Evan KellerLarry Baker
This study was funded in part by the Canine Health Foundation.Dog photos were provided by Warren Photographic.
Barbara Kitchell (Michigan State)Karen Michalski (Serenity Animal Hosp)Chieko Azuma (Tufts)David Vail (Colorado)Chand Khanna (NCI)
UppsalaNicolette HillbertzLeif AnderssonGöran AnderssonÅke HedhammarOlle KämpeHenrik von EulerGerli Pielberg