22
SESSION 1 SESSION 1-5 RISK INFORMED REGULATION RISK INFORMED REGULATION RISK-INFORMED REGULATION CASE STUDY I RISK-INFORMED REGULATION CASE STUDY I ROP/SDP ROP/SDP D i H i D i H i Donnie Harrison U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission D i H i @ Donnie Harrison U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission D i H i @ Donnie.Harrison@nrc.gov 301.415.2470 Donnie.Harrison@nrc.gov 301.415.2470 RISK RISK-INFORMED REGULATION SEMINAR INFORMED REGULATION SEMINAR Mexico City, Mexico Mexico City, Mexico August 27 August 27-31, 2012 31, 2012

REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

SE

SS

ION

1S

ES

SIO

N 1

--55

RIS

KIN

FOR

ME

DR

EG

UL

AT

ION

RIS

KIN

FOR

ME

DR

EG

UL

AT

ION

RIS

K-I

NFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LA

TIO

N

CA

SE S

TU

DY

IR

ISK

-IN

FOR

ME

D R

EG

UL

AT

ION

C

ASE

ST

UD

Y I

RO

P/SD

PR

OP/

SDP

Di

Hi

Di

Hi

Don

nie

Har

rison

U.S

. Nuc

lear

Reg

ulat

ory

Com

mis

sion

Di

Hi

@

Don

nie

Har

rison

U.S

. Nuc

lear

Reg

ulat

ory

Com

mis

sion

Di

Hi

@D

onni

e.H

arris

on@

nrc.

gov

301.

415.

2470

Don

nie.

Har

rison

@nr

c.go

v30

1.41

5.24

70

RIS

KR

ISK

--INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

Mex

ico

City

, Mex

ico

Mex

ico

City

, Mex

ico

Aug

ust 2

7A

ugus

t 27--

31, 2

012

31, 2

012

Page 2: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

LE

AR

NIN

G O

BJE

CT

IVE

S•

To d

escr

ibe

NR

C’s

reac

tor o

vers

ight

-si

gnifi

canc

e de

term

inat

ion

proc

ess

and

deci

sion

crite

riade

term

inat

ion

proc

ess

and

deci

sion

crit

eria

•To

illu

stra

te k

ey a

spec

ts o

f ass

ocia

ted

risk

anal

ysis

m

etho

ds u

sing

2 e

xam

ples

–C

onsi

dera

tion

of m

ultip

le h

azar

dsC

onsi

dera

tion

ofco

mm

onca

use

failu

rean

d–

Con

side

ratio

n of

com

mon

cau

se fa

ilure

and

hu

man

per

form

ance

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

1

Page 3: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Ove

rvie

w

•SD

P O

bjec

tives

j–

To c

hara

cter

ize

the

safe

ty o

r sec

urity

sig

nific

ance

of

insp

ectio

n fin

ding

s, u

sing

bes

t ava

ilabl

e ris

k in

sigh

ts

asap

prop

riate

as a

ppro

pria

te

–To

pro

vide

all

stak

ehol

ders

an

obje

ctiv

e an

d co

mm

on

pj

fram

ewor

k fo

r com

mun

icat

ing

the

pote

ntia

l saf

ety

or

secu

rity

sign

ifica

nce

of in

spec

tion

findi

ngs

–To

pro

vide

a b

asis

for t

imel

y as

sess

men

t and

/or

enfo

rcem

ent a

ctio

ns a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith in

spec

tion

fidi

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

2

findi

ngs

Page 4: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Ove

rvie

w

•SD

P P

roce

ss-

Dev

elop

insp

ectio

n fin

ding

s-

Cha

ract

eriz

e si

gnifi

canc

e (in

itial

sta

ff as

sess

men

t)g

()

-O

btai

n lic

ense

e pe

rspe

ctiv

es o

n in

itial

ch

arac

teriz

atio

n-

Fina

lize

staf

f’s s

igni

fican

ce d

eter

min

atio

n-

Issu

e fin

al d

eter

min

atio

n le

tter

-P

rovi

de li

cens

ee a

ppea

l opp

ortu

nity

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

3

Page 5: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Ove

rvie

w

•Dec

isio

n cr

iteria

–C

hang

e in

:–

Cor

e da

mag

e f

ΔCD

F <

1x10

-6

frequ

ency

–La

rge

early

rele

ase

frequ

ency

1X10

-6≤

ΔC

DF

< 1X

10-5

1X10

CD

F1X

104

qy

–B

road

rang

es1X

10-5≤

ΔC

DF

< 1X

10-4

4ΔC

DF ≥

1x1

0-4

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

4

Page 6: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

App

licat

ion

Exa

mpl

e 1:

The

Eve

ntT

he E

vent

•A

ugus

t 23:

5.8

Mag

nitu

de (1

1 m

iles)

at s

hallo

w d

epth

.•

Rea

ctor

trip

& L

OO

P. A

ll fo

ur E

DG

s (1

H, 1

J &

2H

, 2J)

sta

rt/lo

aded

.•

Coo

lant

leak

obse

rved

onU

nit2

ED

G“2

H”.

SB

OE

DG

star

t/loa

ded.

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

5

Coo

lant

leak

obs

erve

d on

Uni

t 2 E

DG

2H

. SB

O E

DG

sta

rt/lo

aded

.•

Afte

r ide

ntify

ing

leak

, ED

G 2

H w

as re

paire

d an

d m

ade

avai

labl

e (6

hrs

)

Page 7: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

App

licat

ion

Exa

mpl

e 1:

The

Failu

reT

he F

ailu

re

Fairb

anks

Mor

seD

iese

lGen

erat

ors

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

Die

sel G

ener

ator

s (M

odel

38T

D8-

1/8)

Page 8: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 1:

The

Roo

tCau

seT

he R

oot C

ause

•R

oot c

ause

eva

luat

ion

on E

DG

gas

kets

foun

d ev

iden

ce o

f:–

gask

etto

gask

etin

cons

iste

ncie

sin

com

pres

sion

,ga

sket

to g

aske

t inc

onsi

sten

cies

in c

ompr

essi

on,

–cl

ear i

ndic

atio

ns th

at fa

iled

gask

et h

ad b

een

in th

e pr

oces

s of

m

ovin

g to

war

d fa

ilure

for s

ome

time,

fil

tlik

ld

ti

itili

tll

tibl

ldi

t–

failu

re m

ost l

ikel

ydu

e to

initi

al in

stal

latio

n pr

oble

ms

lead

ing

to

mov

emen

t ove

r tim

e.

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

7

Page 9: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 1:

The

Perf

orm

ance

Def

icie

ncy

The

Per

form

ance

Def

icie

ncy

•S

elf-r

evea

ling,

App

aren

t Vio

latio

n (A

V):

failu

re to

est

ablis

h an

dm

aint

ain

ED

Gm

aint

enan

cepr

oced

ures

asre

quire

dby

and

mai

ntai

n E

DG

mai

nten

ance

pro

cedu

res

as re

quire

d by

R

egul

ator

y G

uide

1.3

3, A

ppen

dix

A, S

ectio

n 9,

Pro

cedu

res

for P

erfo

rmin

g M

aint

enan

ce.

•C

ontra

ry to

the

abov

e, fr

om J

une

2, 2

010

until

Aug

ust 2

3,

2011

the

licen

see

faile

dto

esta

blis

han

dm

aint

ain

adeq

uate

2011

, the

lice

nsee

faile

d to

est

ablis

h an

d m

aint

ain

adeq

uate

E

DG

mai

nten

ance

pro

cedu

res.

•P

roce

dure

did

not

pro

vide

ade

quat

e gu

idan

ce fo

r ins

talla

tion

of th

e ga

sket

whi

ch re

sulte

d in

the

failu

re o

f ED

G 2

H to

pe

rform

itssa

fety

func

tion

onA

ugus

t23

2011

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

8

perfo

rm it

s sa

fety

func

tion

on A

ugus

t 23,

201

1.

Page 10: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 1:

Exp

osur

eT

ime

Exp

osur

e T

ime

24

10 M

ON

THS

1520

ours)

1015

Time (h

RA

SP H

AN

DB

OO

K, S

ec. 2

.4,

Com

pone

nt R

un F

ailu

res,

Σ(ru

n tim

es) >

PR

A m

issi

on ti

me

(24

hour

s)

5

Run

1.57

1.77

1.63

1.53

1.92

1.62

1.57

1.88

1.65

1.68

1.72

0.82

0

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

9

Page 11: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 1:

The

Eva

luat

ion

The

Eva

luat

ion

•Lic

ense

e•N

RC

–E

xpos

ure

Tim

e–

28 d

ays

base

d on

root

cau

se

eval

uatio

n fin

ding

s

–E

xpos

ure

Tim

e–

10 m

onth

s ba

sed

on ro

ot

caus

e ev

alua

tion

findi

ngs

–C

omm

on C

ause

–S

houl

d be

trea

ted

as

inde

pend

ent f

ailu

re w

ith

nom

inal

com

mon

cau

se

–C

omm

on C

ause

–S

houl

d be

trea

ted

as a

failu

re

with

pot

entia

l for

com

mon

ca

use

to o

ther

ED

Gs

–C

redi

t for

var

ious

pr

obab

ilitie

s–

Add

ition

al c

redi

t for

ope

rato

r ti

–C

redi

t for

var

ious

pr

obab

ilitie

s–

Lim

ited

addi

tiona

l cre

dit f

or

tti

actio

ns–

Low

er v

alue

s fo

r com

pone

nt

prob

abilit

ies

& c

omm

on c

ause

–A

dditi

onal

cre

dit f

or re

cove

ry

oper

ator

act

ions

–Lo

wer

val

ues

for c

ompo

nent

pr

obab

ilitie

s &

com

mon

cau

se

not j

ustif

ied

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

10

curv

es–

Add

ition

al c

redi

t for

reco

very

cu

rves

doe

s no

t affe

ct re

sults

Page 12: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 1:

The

Out

com

eT

he O

utco

me

•Exa

mpl

e 1

–Fi

nal S

DP

: –

Whi

te (U

nit1

) & W

hite

(Uni

t 2),

i.e.,

low

to m

oder

ate

safe

tysi

gnifi

canc

e(in

tern

alan

dex

tern

alev

ents

)sa

fety

sig

nific

ance

(int

erna

l and

ext

erna

l eve

nts)

–Fa

ctor

s–

Exp

osur

e Ti

me

& C

omm

on C

ause

–M

ultip

lere

dund

ant s

ourc

es o

f em

erge

ncy

AC

pow

er

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

11

Page 13: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

App

licat

ion

Exa

mpl

e 2:

The

Insp

ectio

nFi

ndin

gT

he In

spec

tion

Find

ing

•Im

prop

er m

aint

enan

ce o

f EC

CS

reci

rcul

atio

n p

plin

e va

lve(

s)–

Key

PR

A/S

DP

asp

ects

–Im

porta

nce

of v

alve

in d

iffer

ent L

OC

A s

cena

rios

–P

oten

tial f

or c

omm

on c

ause

failu

re o

f red

unda

nt

lva

lve

–P

oten

tial f

or h

uman

act

ion

to o

pen

valv

e

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

12

Page 14: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 2:

EC

CS

reci

rcul

atio

n lin

e va

lve

fails

to o

pen

pVa

lve

B fa

ils to

op

en d

ue to

w

ater

intru

sion

in

EC

CS

trai

n B

in

oper

able

Wha

t eve

nts

will

requ

ire V

alve

A o

r B

to fu

nctio

n?

RH

R H

X B

wat

er in

trusi

on in

va

lve

oper

ator

p

RH

R P

ump

BC

ont I

so V

alve

B

Rec

irc P

ump

B

Can

Val

ve B

be

open

edin

time

if

How

like

ly a

re th

e op

erat

ors

to o

pen

How

like

ly a

re

thes

e ev

ents

? Rec

irc P

ump

AR

HR

A H

X

open

ed in

tim

e, if

ne

eded

?Va

lve

B?

RH

R P

ump

AC

ont I

so V

alve

A

Will

Valv

e A

func

tion

How

like

ly is

Val

ve A

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

13

if ne

eded

?y

to fa

il du

e to

a

com

mon

cau

se?

How

like

ly is

Val

ve A

to

fail?

Page 15: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 2a

:E

CC

S re

circ

ulat

ion

line

valv

e fa

ils to

ope

np

Valv

e B

fails

to

open

due

to

wat

erin

trusi

onin

EC

CS

trai

n B

in

oper

able

RH

R H

X B

wat

er in

trusi

on in

va

lve

oper

ator

p

RH

R P

ump

BC

ont I

so V

alve

B

Rec

irc P

ump

B

Rec

irc P

ump

AR

HR

A H

X

RH

R P

ump

AC

ont I

so V

alve

A

How

like

ly is

Val

ve A

W

ater

intru

sion

als

o

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

14

yto

fail

due

to a

co

mm

on c

ause

?fo

und

in V

alve

A

oper

ator

Page 16: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 2a

:T

heE

valu

atio

nT

he E

valu

atio

n

•Lic

ense

e•N

RC

–Lo

w h

ead

safe

ty in

ject

ion

pum

p w

ould

be s

tarte

d w

ith V

alve

B

–Lo

w h

ead

safe

ty in

ject

pu

mp

wou

ld–

Not

be

star

ted

with

Val

ve B

in

dica

ting

dua

l pos

ition

–Va

lve

B h

as a

mod

erat

e pr

obab

ility

of b

eing

re

stor

ed

indi

catin

g du

al p

ositi

on

–V

alve

B h

as a

low

pr

obab

ility

of b

eing

re

stor

edre

stor

ed–

succ

ess

prob

abilit

y of

loca

l m

anua

l act

ions

–Va

lve

A ha

s

rest

ored

–su

cces

s pr

obab

ility

of lo

cal

man

ual a

ctio

ns

–V

alve

A h

as–

low

rand

om fa

ilure

pro

babi

lity

–no

incr

ease

d pr

obab

ility

of

com

mon

cau

se fa

ilure

–lo

w ra

ndom

failu

re p

roba

bilit

y–

incr

ease

d pr

obab

ility

of

com

mon

cau

se fa

ilure

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

15

Page 17: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 2a

:T

heO

utco

me

The

Out

com

e

•Exa

mpl

e 2a

p–

Fina

l SD

P:

–S

ubst

antiv

e sa

fety

sig

nific

ance

–Y

ello

w–

Fact

ors

–Ti

me

fram

efo

rreq

uire

dop

erat

ion

–Ti

me

fram

e fo

r req

uire

d op

erat

ion

–Lo

w re

cove

ry p

roba

bilit

y of

firs

t val

ve–

Com

mon

cau

se fa

ilure

pro

babi

lity

of s

econ

d va

lve

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

16

Page 18: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 2b

:E

CC

S re

circ

ulat

ion

line

valv

e fa

ils to

ope

np

Valv

e B

fails

to

open

due

to

wat

erin

trusi

onin

EC

CS

trai

n B

in

oper

able

RH

R H

X B

wat

er in

trusi

on in

va

lve

oper

ator

p

RH

R P

ump

BC

ont I

so V

alve

B

Rec

irc P

ump

B

How

like

ly a

re th

e op

erat

ors

to o

pen

Man

ual o

peni

ng

requ

ires

exte

nsiv

e w

ork

Rec

irc P

ump

AR

HR

A H

X

Valv

e B?

RH

R P

ump

AC

ont I

so V

alve

A

How

like

ly is

Val

ve A

N

o w

ater

intru

sion

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

17

yto

fail

due

to a

co

mm

on c

ause

?fo

und

in V

alve

B

oper

ator

Page 19: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 2b

:T

heE

valu

atio

nT

he E

valu

atio

n

•Lic

ense

e•N

RC

–R

ecov

ery

for o

pera

tion

of

Valv

e A

and

B fo

r Med

ium

LO

CA

s sh

ould

be

cred

ited

–N

o re

cove

ry fo

r ope

ratio

n of

Val

ve A

or B

Med

ium

LO

CA

s sh

ould

be

cred

ited

–A

dequ

ate

time

is a

vaila

ble

to

perfo

rm re

cove

ry a

ctio

ns

–Va

lve

B h

as a

mod

erat

e pr

obab

ility

ofbe

ing

–A

dequ

ate

time

is n

ot a

vaila

ble

to p

erfo

rm re

cove

ry a

ctio

ns

–V

alve

B h

as a

low

pr

obab

ility

ofbe

ing

prob

abili

ty o

f bei

ng

rest

ored

–su

cces

s pr

obab

ility

of lo

cal

man

ual a

ctio

ns

prob

abili

ty o

f bei

ng

rest

ored

–su

cces

s pr

obab

ility

of lo

cal

man

ual a

ctio

ns

–Va

lve

A ha

s–

low

rand

om fa

ilure

pro

babi

lity

–no

incr

ease

d pr

obab

ility

of

com

mon

caus

efa

ilure

–V

alve

A h

as–

rand

om fa

ilure

pro

babi

lity

–In

crea

sed

prob

abilit

y of

co

mm

onca

use

failu

re

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

18

com

mon

cau

se fa

ilure

com

mon

cau

se fa

ilure

Page 20: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

Exa

mpl

e 2b

:T

heO

utco

me

The

Out

com

e

•Exa

mpl

e 2b

p–

Fina

l SD

P–

Low

to m

oder

ate

safe

ty s

igni

fican

ceW

hit

–W

hite

–Fa

ctor

s–

Tim

e fra

me

for r

equi

red

oper

atio

n (ti

min

g of

RW

ST

drai

n (

gdo

wn

and

depl

etio

n)–

Low

reco

very

pro

babi

lity

of fi

rst v

alve

–M

oder

ate

com

mon

cau

se fa

ilure

pro

babi

lity

of s

econ

d va

lve

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

19

Page 21: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

SUM

MA

RY

•Th

e ob

ject

ive

of th

e si

gnifi

canc

e de

term

inat

ion

proc

ess

isto

char

acte

rize

the

safe

tyor

secu

rity

proc

ess

is to

cha

ract

eriz

e th

e sa

fety

or s

ecur

ity

sign

ifica

nce

of in

spec

tion

findi

ngs,

usi

ng b

est

avai

labl

e ris

k in

sigh

ts, a

s ap

prop

riate

.

•N

RC

sta

ff pe

rform

thes

e ev

alua

tions

, pro

vidi

ng

licen

see

oppo

rtuni

ties

to p

rovi

de p

ersp

ectiv

es.

•S

DP

eva

luat

ions

illu

stra

te th

e im

porta

nce

of h

avin

g re

alis

ticcu

rrent

PR

As

real

istic

, cur

rent

PR

As.

Aug

ust 2

7-31

, 201

2 R

ISK

-INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

20

Page 22: REGULATION INFORMED REGULATIONSDP Ob j ectives – To characterize the safety or security significance of inspection findings, using best available risk insights as appropriateas

The

End

The

End

The

End

The

End

Que

stio

ns &

Ans

wer

s…..

Que

stio

ns &

Ans

wer

s…..

RIS

KR

ISK

--INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

INFO

RM

ED

RE

GU

LATI

ON

SE

MIN

AR

Mex

ico

City

, Mex

ico

Mex

ico

City

, Mex

ico

Aug

ust 2

7A

ugus

t 27--

31, 2

012

31, 2

012

21