Upload
dinhdien
View
223
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 www.arpapress.com/Volumes/Vol21Issue2/IJRRAS_21_2_01.pdf
60
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIAL CAPITAL AND
ORGANIZATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP
(Case Study: Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah)
Babak Jamshidinavid1, Mojtaba Chavoshani2 & Farzad Parse3 1Department of Accounting, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
2Department of Accounting, Ghasr-e-Shirin Branch, Islamic Azad University,Ghasreshirin, Kermanshah, Iran 3Department of Language, Ghasr-e-Shirin Branch, Islamic Azad University,Ghasreshirin, Kermanshah, Iran.
Corresponding author: Mojtaba Chavoshani , Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, according to the extent and variety of changes inflicted on the body of the organizations, they have found
to deal with the changes that so have faced, They Should be associated with the new compounds of their existing
resources to provide new competitive advantages and this is why the importance of creative staffing and innovative
human resources and the entrepreneurs of organization have become more prominent. Since university education as
the main custodians of HR professionals play a vital role in society, entrepreneurship consideration in this matter will
help the organization to develop better and in the meantime, the social capital and pay special attention to it, is a
crucial factor in achieving organizational goals and in order to promote and facilitate the organization of programs is
important which the processes of innovation, creativity and collective learning are affected by it , and it's easy to
achieve .This study is about relationship between the social capita and entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University
of Kermanshah. Staff and faculty members of Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah have formed Statistical Society
in this study. And among them, 210 persons are selected as the study sample. Analysis of the research model and
hypotheses testing were performed by using structural equation approach , as well as, confirmatory factor analysis and
Path analysis diagram was performed by using LISREL software , and the results showed that there is a significant
relationship between social capital (Structural, cognitive and relational) and entrepreneurship.
KEYWORDS: Social capital, Organizational entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial University, Islamic Azad
University of Kermanshah.
1. INTRODUCTION
World in the late twentieth century has witnessed massive changes in all areas of the business, where the concepts
like globalization, Increasing competition, the development of information technology, knowledge explosion and the
like organizations are made to deal with these changes. Turning to entrepreneurship is the main solution to deal with
these changes, which is recognized as a key factor in economic growth and development in the modern age, and
organizational flexibility and the strategy of continual change processes. products and projects are the main
advantages of entrepreneurial organizations. Therefore entrepreneurship does not a meaning of job contrary to its
appearance, but the entrepreneur can be any person or organization as a mechanism to dealing with changes and the
manifestation of ideas to reality. Naturally promoting a culture of entrepreneurship in a society requires purposeful
planning and continuing education of personnel at all levels, so the role of universities is important as the main
custodians foster creative and innovative human capital, Therefore there is a great need of academic entrepreneurship. Most of the research into entrepreneurship are the type of the personality characteristics of entrepreneurs and the type
of structural and environmental status, it has been criticized for the lack of attention in the network of social relations
(Social Capital), this means that non-economic factors. The element Cognitive social capital referring to the resources
that provide symbols, interpretations, and systems of shared meanings among groups. The most important aspects are the following: Language, codes and the shared anecdotes (Rhodes, et al, 2008). Nowadays, Entrepreneurship from the
perspective of social scientists is a process of social network that is located in a network of social relations, but the
association of social relationships can facilitate or limit the entrepreneur relationship with the resources and
opportunities. This concept refers to the links, the links between members of a network as a valuable resource, that
causes achieving the goals of its members only by creating norms and mutual trust. In this study we have attempted
to introduce the constituent dimensions of social capital and entrepreneurial organization with an emphasis on the
characteristics of the entrepreneurial university, now Let us examine these two issues in Islamic Azad University of
Kermanshah.
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 Jamshidinavid et al. ● Capital & Organizational Entrepreneurship
61
2. LITERATURE
Beugelsdijk and Schaik with a cross-sectional study in 54 states of Europe, Examined the relationship between social
capital and economic growth for the period 1950 and 1990 in Europe. There is a significant the relationship between
economic growth and active members of groups based on their results. Lean Non and Santos (2007) concluded of their
study as Does social capital has an impact on the intention of entrepreneur? They have reached the conclusion that
impact of Social factors and new economic of Social Capital will creat entrepreneurship intentions. Using partial least
squares (PLS) Select the method to data from undergraduate students, According to their study, the Results indicate that with increasing social capital the tendencies are forward to establishment of companies and entrepreneurs.
Mark, et al (2009), have examined the relationship between social capital (Relational, cognitive), Entrepreneurship,
team effectiveness and team performance In their research, as The Role of Social Capital efficient team on the
performance of the team entrepreneurship. Data were collected through an online survey of students, members of a
project team and their results showed that perceptions of social capital in the form of relational capital, cognitive
capital for entrepreneurship leads to a significant positive predictor in the team effectiveness. Sari Livonen, et al
(2010) in their study as Social capital and entrepreneurial behavior and promote innovation for Interaction between
researchers and small entrepreneurs in rural , that In this study they have used the theoretical concepts of social
approach which it is the combination of social capital and entrepreneurial behavior . This study was conducted to
their work on food production in the south of Finland. As a result of interviews with 15 groups of entrepreneurs had
been assumed by Phenomengraphic way. It was found that the key stimulus collaborations between entrepreneurs and
researchers are embedded in the common understanding. Entrepreneurial behavior and training is a confidence-
building process. The results indicate that researchers are requiring rural entrepreneurs in order to pave the way for
the promotion of innovation. Petrou and Daskalopoulou (2013) examined the relationship between social capital and
innovation in their study as Social capital and innovation in the service sector and tourism industry of Greece. And
their results show that there is a strong relationship between social capital and innovation with relying on knowledge
management. Rothaermel, et al (2006) believe that an integrated the entrepreneurial culture Professors can be the
most important of engine development of an entrepreneurial university alongside a strong executive and motivated
Who have a history of entrepreneurship. Patel and Conklin (2009) believe that Social Capital Resources is a energy or
power that shapes the structure of economic factors and focuses on a specific purpose in a social context.
In today's business world, most value-based corporate assets are Intangibles. It is vital and important for organizations
have the ability to identify and estimate the source of the value. In order to enable the management of social capital,
we need to identify its origin and knowing how to create these assets in our organization (Frits and Leana).
So one of the factors in opportunity identification is social capital, which includes social networks .In fact, these
networks are facing entrepreneurs with the more resources and opportunities and And expand the circle of his chosen
(Bhagavatula, et al 2010).
Ghoshal and Nahapy Placed in three different aspects of social capital with organizational approach: Cognitive capital,
structural capital and relational capital (Sabatini, 2008).
Whatever social networks become more widespread entrepreneurship, further opportunities are identified. One of the
factors in opportunity identification is social network. These networks are facing entrepreneurs with the resources and
opportunities so it expand circle of their choice (Batjargal 2010). In recent years regarding the role of entrepreneurs
in economic growth and industrial, As well as with regard to the problems and limitations particularly unemployment
in the field of industrial development and economic, Is necessary to promote the development of entrepreneurship
widely (Ardichvili, et al).
3. RESEARCH HYPOTHESES
3.1. The main hypothesis
There is a significant relationship between social capital and entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University of
Kermanshah.
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 Jamshidinavid et al. ● Capital & Organizational Entrepreneurship
62
3.2. Secondly hypothesis
1- There is a significant relationship between Structural capital and entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University
of Kermanshah.
2- There is a significant relationship between Cognitive Capital and entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University
of Kermanshah.
3- There is a significant relationship between Corporate Entrepreneurship and bringing Capital in Islamic Azad
University of Kermanshah.
4- There is a significant relationship between social capital and Entrepreneurial Organization in Islamic Azad
University of Kermanshah.
5- There is a significant relationship between social capital and Shared vision and Providential Strategy in
Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah.
6- There is a significant relationship between social capital and Interaction with the environment in Islamic
Azad University of Kermanshah.
7- There is a significant relationship between social capital and Entrepreneurial corporate culture in Islamic
Azad University of Kermanshah.
3.3. Society and Statistical sample
This study is covering the statistical population and all of the academic members and staff of Islamic Azad University
of Kermanshah. And according to reports, this number takes the 230 academic member and 265 members of staff.
Because the statistical population is limited in the present study, the finite population is used to determine the sample
size for biopsy and Cochran formula is as follows:
So, p=0.5, q= 0.5, N= 495 and Z= 1.96
Therefore the sample size that should be selected of whole levels is equal 210.
4. METHODOLOGY
Since the goal of the present study was to determine the relationship between social capital and Entrepreneurship,
therefore the aim is Functional and the process of data collection is descriptive and is the correlation type.
To check the status questionnaire from the mean test of the society (T an example) and to evaluate the correlation
between research variable Pearson's correlation coefficient was used. Confirmatory, factor analysis is used at the analysis of this study to significance test relations between questions and the variables and the fit of the measurement models and assess the validity. Finally in order to evaluate the effects of research variables used structural equation
modeling (SEM), and LISREL software is used at Path analysis technique specifically.
4.1. Structural model to test the hypothesis
The effect of social capital on entrepreneurship is 0.84 and it’s significantly is 10.15. (Approval)
The null hypothesis and one to confirm or refute the hypothesis is as follows:
H0 = There is no significant correlation between the two variables.
H1= There is a significant correlation between the two variables.
If the significant number (Coefficient of T) be greater than 1.96 in regression test, the null hypothesis Will be rejected
and one Will be verified, and conversely.
In the test hypotheses by using structural equation modeling, firstly, the software output indicates that the structural
model fitted to test the hypothesis. (X ratio to df is less than 3). Amount of RMSEA = 053.0 which indicates that the
structural model is fitted. In other words, it has been observed this has largely consistent with the conceptual model.
Amount of GFI, A GFI, NFI, Respectively equivalent to 91.0, 78.0, 93.0 which indicates a good fit of the model. All
model fitting parameters are discussed in the more:
Normed Fit Index= 0.93
Goodness of Fit Index (GFL) = 0.91
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) =0.87
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 Jamshidinavid et al. ● Capital & Organizational Entrepreneurship
63
Table 1. Confirm or reject the main hypothesis
Approval or rejection Significant The effect Research hypotheses
Approval
10.15
0.84
social capital on
entrepreneurship
4.2. Structural model to test the hypothesis 1, 2 and 3
The following structural model is explained and tested in the semantically coefficient estimates and standard secondary
hypotheses 1, 2, 3
1- There is a significant relationship between Structural capital and entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University of
Kermanshah.
2- There is a significant relationship between Cognitive Capital and entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University of
Kermanshah.
3- There is a significant relationship between Corporate Entrepreneurship and Briging Capital in Islamic Azad
University of Kermanshah.
as was calculated:
The effect of structural capital and entrepreneurship is 0.39 and its Significantly is 4.75.( Approval)
The effect of cognitive capital and entrepreneurship is 0.52 and it’s significantly is 5.12. (Approval)
The effect of bridging capital and entrepreneurship is 0.22 and it’s significantly is 1.96. (Approval)
The null hypothesis and one to confirm or refute the hypothesis is as follows:
H0 = There is no significant correlation between the two variables.
H1= There is a significant correlation between the two variables.
If the significant number (Coefficient of T) be greater than 1.96 in Regression test, the null hypothesis Will be rejected
and one Will be verified, and conversely.
Table 2 shows an overview confirm or refute Research hypotheses:
Table 2. Examine the hypotheses 1, 2, 3
Approval or rejection Significant The effect Research hypotheses
Approval
Approval
Approval
4.75
5.12
1.96
0.39
0.52
0.22
Structural capital on
entrepreneurship
Cognitive capital on entrepreneurship
Corporate Entrepreneurship
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 Jamshidinavid et al. ● Capital & Organizational Entrepreneurship
64
In the test hypotheses by using structural equation modeling, firstly, the software output indicates that the structural model fitted to
test the hypothesis. (X ratio to df is less than 3). Amount of RMSEA= 062.0 which indicates that the structural model is fitted. In
other words, It has been observed this has largely consistent with the conceptual model. Amount of GFI , A GFI , NFI Respectively equivalent to 91.0 , 85.0, 90.0 which indicates a good fit of the model. All model fitting parameters are discussed in the more:
Normed Fit Index= 0.91
Goodness of Fit Index (GFL) = 0.90
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) =0.85
4.3. Structural model to test the hypothesis 4, 5, 6 and 7 The following structural model is explained and tested in the semantically coefficient estimates and standard secondary hypotheses
4, 5, 6, 7.
4- There is a significant relationship between social capital and Entrepreneurial Organization in Islamic Azad University of
Kermanshah.
5- There is a significant relationship between social capital and Shared vision and Providential Strategy in Islamic Azad University
of Kermanshah.
6- There is a significant relationship between social capital and Interaction with the environment in Islamic Azad University of
Kermanshah.
7- There is a significant relationship between social capital and Entrepreneurial corporate culture in Islamic Azad University of
Kermanshah.
The effect of social capital on Entrepreneurial Organization is 0.86 and it’s significantly is 12.14. (Approval)
The effect of social capital on Entrepreneurial corporate culture is 0.61 and it’s significantly is 9.07. (Approval)
The effect of social capital on Interaction with the environment is 0.70 and it’s significantly is 10.23. (Approval)
The effect of social capital on Shared vision and Providential Strategy is 0.73 and it’s significantly is 9.86. (Approval)
If the significant number (Coefficient of T) be greater than 1.96 in regression test, the null hypothesis will be rejected and one will
be verified, and conversely.
Table 3. Examine the hypotheses 4, 5, 6, 7
Approval or rejection Significant The effect Research hypotheses
Approval
Approval
Approval
Approval
12.4
9.07
10.23
9.86
0.86
0.61
0.7
0.73
social capital on Entrepreneurial
Organization
social capital on Entrepreneurial corporate culture
social capital on Interaction with the environment
social capital on Shared vision
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 Jamshidinavid et al. ● Capital & Organizational Entrepreneurship
65
In the test hypotheses by using structural equation modeling, firstly, the software output indicates that the structural model fitted to
test the hypothesis. (X ratio to df is less than 3). Amount of RMSEA= 053.0 which indicates that the structural model is fitted. In
other words, it has been observed this has largely consistent with the conceptual model. Amount of GFI, A GFI, NFI Respectively equivalent to 95.0, 90.0, 93.0 which indicates a good fit of the model. All model fitting parameters are discussed in the more:
Normed Fit Index= 0.95
Goodness of Fit Index (GFL) = 0.93
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) =0.90
5. RESULTS
In the this study based on the literature research and existing models In this area, The conceptual model was tested to
evaluate the role of social capital on corporate entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah, and
hypotheses research based on the hypothesized relationships tack placed in the testing model. Formulated hypotheses
were tested by using confirmatory factor analysis and hypotheses were confirmed with certainty 0.95 and the test of
proposed model was conducted and Path coefficients were examined by using SEM structural equation modeling.
5.1. The results of the hypotheses
In general, to evaluate models designed in social capital and entrepreneurial organization LISREL software is used.
To evaluate the performance of the model compared to other models used the fitness index values (NFI), Relative fit index (RFI), increasing the fitness index (IFI), and Comparative fitness index (CFI). Values above 0.9 indicate a good
fit of designed model in comparison with other existing models.
5.2. Results of structural equation modeling
Lisrel output models in explaining the structural equation analysis of the impact of social capital on corporate
entrepreneurship (secondary hypotheses 1, 2, 3) has the highest impact factor of 0.52 times the standard estimates in
the second order factor analysis of the cognition of capital social, and Placed a priority and it has the greatest impact on entrepreneurship. Then social capital and structural factor loading 0.39 and finally the relationship of social capital
with a load factor of 0.22 has the least impact on the dimensions of social capital on organizational entrepreneurs.
Significant coefficients in the second order factor analysis show a significant coefficient for the hypothesized.
So Lisrel output models in explaining the structural equation analysis of the impact of social capital on corporate
entrepreneurship (secondary hypotheses 4, 5, 6,7) is the priority for the standard estimate of the second-order factor
analysis of the impact of social capital on different aspects , to arrange with the impact of social capital on
entrepreneurial organization with a load factor of 12.4 and the impact of social capital on continuous interaction with
the environment with the load factor of 10.3, and the impact of social capital on entrepreneurial corporate culture
with a factor loading of 9.86, Finally, the impact of capital on a shared vision and providential strategy has 9.07 load
factor. Significant coefficients in the second order factor analysis show a significant coefficient for the hypothesized.
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 Jamshidinavid et al. ● Capital & Organizational Entrepreneurship
66
Table 4. The results of the research hypotheses
Test
results Significant The effect Text of the research hypotheses Hypothesis
confirmation
confirmation
confirmation
confirmation
confirmation
confirmation
confirmation
confirmation
10.15
4.75
5.12
1.96
12.4
9.07
10.23
9.86
0.84
0.39
0.52
0.22
0.86
0.61
0.7
0.73
There is a significant relationship between social capital and
entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah.
There is a significant relationship between Structural capital and
entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah.
There is a significant relationship between Cognitive Capital and
entrepreneurship in Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah.
There is a significant relationship between Corporate Entrepreneurship
and Briging Capital in Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah.
There is a significant relationship between social capital and
Entrepreneurial Organization in Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah.
There is a significant relationship between social capital and Shared vision
and Providential Strategy in Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah.
There is a significant relationship between social capital and Interaction
with the environment in Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah.
There is a significant relationship between social capital and Entrepreneurial corporate culture in Islamic Azad University of
Kermanshah.
main
first
second
third
fourth
fifth
sixth
seventh
5.3. The results of the mean test
In the mean test, the status of social capital in Azad University indicates that the different dimensions of social capital,
which includes aspects of structural, cognitive and relational , in the event that structural and relational capital
structure are in good condition, although the cognitive dimension of social capital in the confirmatory factor analysis
which has the greatest impact on entrepreneurship in universities but its situation has not evaluate in a satisfactory
condition according to the t-statistics which located in the critical area.
As well as, Status of Entrepreneurship in the mean test shows that entrepreneurial organizational structure has been
assessed at an average level, and other aspects are improper that encompass the shared vision and strategy providential,
continuous interaction with the environment and entrepreneurial corporate culture. In general, a variable rate of
entrepreneurship (dependent variable of research) is viewed unfavorably in Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah.
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 Jamshidinavid et al. ● Capital & Organizational Entrepreneurship
67
5. CONCLUSION
The results of this study led to the identification and examination of social capital and entrepreneurship at the
University, and findings from confirm the factor the appropriateness of the model components and it shows their
impact on the views of staff and faculty members. Accordingly, terms of social capital and its dimensions can be
considered as a key factor in strengthening corporate entrepreneurship. Results indicated that, performance of
university could not impress dimensions of entrepreneurship at an acceptable level, in the context of collaborative
management, teamwork, orientation toward collective goal, collaborative activities with colleagues and sharing of
resources, despite their high impact entrepreneurship. Results indicated that, The Entrepreneurship Organizational has
been rated as unsatisfactory at the University and to solve this problem, must perform the basic actions, in order to
strengthen social capital and the enhancement of social capital within the framework Entrepreneurship Organizational.
Obviously, the morality of team working should cleave the boundaries of conventional in the organization, and should
join the value chain of the organization and groups of the united organization.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch, who has been supportive of this project.
REFERENCES
[1] Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R. and Ray, S. (2008). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and
development, Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1):pp. 105–123.
[2] Batjargal, B. (2010). Internet Enterpreneurship: Social Capital, Human Capital, and Performance of internet
Ventures in china, Research Policy, vol.36, pp.605-618.
[3] Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Tilburg, A. V., Gerhard G. V. B. (2010). How Social and Human Capital Influence
Opportunity Recognition and Resource Mobilization in India's Handloom Industry, Journal of Business
Venturing, Vol. 25, No. 3, PP. 245-260.
[4] Liñán, F. & Javier Santos, F. (2007). Does Social Capital Affect Entrepreneurial Intentions? Int Adv Econ Res.
13:443–453.
[5] Frits, K. P., & Leana, C. (2009). The effects of teacher human and social capital on student performance.
Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1101-1124.
[6] Schenkel, M. and Garrison, G. (2009). Exploring the roles of social capital and team-efficacy in virtual
entrepreneurial team performance, Management Research News,Vol. 32 No. 6, 2009, pp. 525-538.
[7] Patel, P. C. & Conklin, B. (2009). The Balancing Act: The Role of Transnational Habitus and
Social Networks in Balancing Transnational Entrepreneurial Activities, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol.
33, PP. 1045-1078
[8] Petrou, A. Irene Daskalopoulou. (2013). Social capital and innovation in the services sector. European Journal
of Innovation Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, PP.50-69.
[9] Rhodes, J., Lok, P., hung, R.Y.Y. & fang, S.C. (2008). An integrative model of organizational learning and
social capital on effective knowledge transfer and perceived organizational performance. Journal of workplace
learning, 20(4), 245-258.
[10] Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D. and Jiang, L. (2006). universityentrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature,
Special Issue of Industrial and Corporate Change.
[11] Sabatini, f. (2008). Dose social capital improve labor productivity in small and medium enterprises?
International journal of management and decision making, 9(5), 452-480.
[12] Sari, L., Kyrö, P., Mynttinen, S., Särkkä‐Tirkkonena, M. and Kahiluoto, H. (2010). Social capital and
entrepreneurial behaviour advancing innovativeness in interaction between small rural entrepreneurs and
researchers: A phenomenographic study. European IFSA Symposium, 9th, pp. 14-22
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 Jamshidinavid et al. ● Capital & Organizational Entrepreneurship
68
Figure 1. model coefficients estimated in the standard
Figure 2. model coefficients is meaningful
IJRRAS 21 (2) ● November 2014 Jamshidinavid et al. ● Capital & Organizational Entrepreneurship
69
Figure 3. model coefficients estimated in the standard
Figure 4. model coefficients is meaningful