Report: Comparative Review of Split Sample Data, Remedial Investigation… · · 2016-06-13REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION CORTESE LANDFILL Work ... Deliverable - Comparative Review of Split

SDMS Document

105209

COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF SPLIT SAMPLE DATA

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION CORTESE LANDFILL

Work Assignment: C02067 (Ref. No. 1-635-200)

Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Contract: 68-W9-0003

TRC TRC Environmental Corporation

300802

l ^ p p H ^ ^ g ^ 291 Broadway, Suite 1206 M flVl^T New York, NY 10007

g g ^ ^ ^ f o r m e r l y Alliance Technologies Corporation -ff (212) 349-4616 Tor- c • I 1 / - i- Fax (212) 349-4648 IKL hnvironmental Corporation .

HAND DELIVERY

January 10, 1994

Erwin Smieszek Regional Project Officer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Emergency and Remedial Response Division 26 Federal Plaza, Room 737 New York, NY 10278

Reference: Contract No. 68-W9-0003, TES 6 Work Assignment No. C02 067 Cortese Landfill RI/FS Compliance Oversight (Ref. 1-635-200)

Subject: Deliverable - Comparative Review of Split Sample Data

Dear Erwin,

In accordance with the reporting requirements of the subject Work Assignment, enclosed is the Comparative Review of Split Sample Data for the Cortese Landfill. This submittal satisfies a deliverable requirement for this Work Assignment. This deliverable is being submitted before the due date of January 12, 1994.

At the request of the WAM, Mark Granger, a copy has been delivered directly to him.

Questions regarding this submission should be directed to the TRC Project Manager, Jeffrey Healey, at (508) 970-5600, or me at (212) 349-4616.

Sincerely,

Douglas Sullivan Regional Manager

DS/cs

CC: Mark-Granger/EPA Work Assignment Manager Jean Poovey/EPA TES-6 Contracting Officer (letter only) Jeffrey Healey/TRC Project Manager TES ZPMO (letter only)

offices in Alobcma, California, Colorado, Connecticut. Illinois, Louisicnc, Masscchusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, Wosfi ington, Washington, D .C, end P-jerro Rico A TRC Componv

™- = 300803

COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF SPLIT SAMPLE DATA REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

CORTESE LANDFILL

Prepared for

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Emergency and Remedial Response Division

26 Federal Plaza New York, New York

Work Assignment No.:

EPA Region:

EPA Site/Facility ID. No.:

Contract No.:

TRC Document No.:

TRC Project No.:

TRC Project Manager:

Telephone No.:

Subcontract No.:

Subcontractor Project Manager:

Telephone No.:

EPA Work Assignment Manager:

Telephone No.:

Date Prepared:

C02067

n NYD980528475

68-W9-0003 (TES 6)

NY-067.RP5

1-635-200-0-2PX9-0

Jeffrey Healey

(508) 970-5600 ext. 5224

N/A

N/A

N/A

Mark Granger

(212) 264-9588

January 7, 1994

TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 291 Broadway, Suite 1206

New York, New York 10017 (212) 349-4616

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL TRC 300804

TfflS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

NY-067.RP5

RECYCLED PAPER

oe

u

ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL

300805 TRC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 OBJECTIVES 3

3.0 SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURE 3

4.0 RESULTS OF DATA COMPARISON ANALYSIS 4

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7

Appendices Page

A Data Comparison Analyses A-1

TABLES

Number Page

1 Cortese LandfiU - Summary of Split Sample EPA Identification Numbers 2 2 Cortese Landfill - Split Samples Displaying Inadequate Comparability 6

NY-067.RP5 iii

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL

TRC fOSOOe 3008M.-

TfflS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

NY-067.RP5 IV

RECYCLED PAPER

...•P98ooe ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL

3«080f TRC

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has requested that TRC Environmental Corporation (TRC - formerly Alliance Technologies Corporation) to provide technical oversight assistance to EPA with respect to the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) activities being performed at Cortese LandfiU, Narrowsburg, Sullivan County, New York. TRC performed this work under Contract No. 68-W9-0003 (TES 6), Work Assignment No. C02067. The investigative work was performed at the Cortese Landfill by Golder Associates, Inc. of Mount Laurel, New Jersey (Golder).

As directed by EPA, TRC obtained a total of 12 split samples (7 soil/sediment, 3 ground water and 2 surface water samples) at Cortese Landfill during the sampling period of April 13, 1993 through April 20, 1993 and June 7 to June 10, 1993. The results of these activities are described in TRC's oversight progress reports dated July 2, 1993. AU split samples were obtained in accordance with TRC's EPA-approved Remedial Investigation (RI) and Site Investigation (SI) Oversigiit Work Plan/Quality Assurance Project Plan (Work PlanlQAPjP) dated March 1993.

This comparative review of split sample data compares the EPA/TRC analytical data with Golder's analytical data for the Remedial Investigation. A total of three ground water spUt samples were collected from monitoring weUs MW-IB, MW-2B, and MW-6B and one subsurface soil split sample from boring SL-1 located near the eastern septage lagoon, two split sediment samples from SS-13 and SS-15 within the Cortese landfill property boundaries, two spUt surface water and their respective sediment samples from SW-ll/SS-21 and SW-12/SS-22 located in White's Pond, and three sediment split samples designated as R2-05, R3-07, and R4-12 from three reaches along the Delaware River.

Ground water and surface water split samples were analyzed through the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) for Target Compound List (TCL) volatile organic compounds by low concentration, TCL semi-volatiles (including BNAs and PCBs/pesticides) and Target Analyte List (TAL) metals and cyanide. ShaUow soil and sediment samples were analyzed for TCL VOCs, pesticides/PCBs and for TAL inorganics (metals and cyanide). VaUdation of the EPA/TRC data set was performed in accordance with Region n guideUnes described below:

• Organics: SOP No. HW-6, Revision #8, CLP Organics Data Review and Preliminary Review, January 1992.

Inorganics: SOP No. HW-2, Revision #11, Evaluation of Metals Data for the CLP (based on SOW 7/88, Rev. 2/89), January 1992.

NY-067.RP5 1

=R 0tk^f%£k& ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL £. • f m W RECYCLED PAPER

TABLE 1. CORTESE LANDFILL - SUMMARY OF SPLIT SAMPLE EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS

Sample Location (Deptii)

1 MW-IB

1MW-2B

| M W - 6 B

1 SW-11

1 SW-12

|sS-13(0-0.5')

:[sS-15(0-0.5')

|sS-21(0-0.5')

|sS-22(0-0.5')

|sL-l(3-3.5')

|R2 -05 (0 - .5 ' )

|R3 -07 (0 - .5 ' )

|R4 -12 (0 - .5 ' )

Date Collecled

04-14-93

04-15-93

04-15-93

06-08-93

06-09-93

04-15-93,

04-13-93

06-08-93

06-09-93

06-09-93

06-10-93

06-10-93

06-10-93

1 Malrix

ground water

ground water

ground water

surface water

surface water

soU

soil

sediment

sediment

sediment

sediment

sediment

sediment

Voiatlles

vSB3543^

SB3544

SB3545

SB3547

SB3548

BGE90

BGE91

BGE88

BGE92

BGE93

BGE85

BGE86

BGE87

BHAs

BGE78

BGE79

BGE80

BGE83

BGE82

BGE90

BGE91

BGE88

BGE92

BGE93

BGE85

BGE86

BGE87

1 Fest./PCBs

BGE78

BGE79 (

BGE80

BGE83

BGE82

BGE90

BGE91

BGE88

BGE92

BGE93

BGE85

BGE86

BGE87

Isorganks

(MBHL78"'

^MBHL79^|

MBHL80 1

MBHL83 1

MBHL82 1

MBHL90 1

MBHL91

MBHL88 1

MBHL92 1

MBHL93

MBHL85 1

MBHL86 1

MBHL87 1

BNAs - Base-Neutral Acid-Extractabies Pest./PCBs - Pesticides/Polychlorinaied Biphenyls

NY-067.RP5

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL TRC

AU validated TRC data has been approved by the EPA Region n Monitoring Management Branch (MMB). A complete cross reference Ust of spUt sample locations and parameters analyzed, along with their respective EPA sample identification numbers, is presented in Table 1.

2.0 OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this spUt sample coUection and data comparative analysis is to quantitatively compare analytical results obtained by Goldeir's laboratory(s) with the results obtained by EPA/TRC through the CLP to determine if data useabiUty problem(s) exists with Golder's data set.

As directed by EPA, additional objectives established for this data comparative effort are as follows:

• to evaluate whether Golder has reported aU analytical data for spUt samples and, if data have been omitted, whether Golder has cited reasons for these omissions;

• to evaluate whether data compares favorably or unfavorably including an analysis of cases where: (1) the EPA/TRC data reflects significantiy higher concentrations than those reported by Golder, (2) the contaminant of concern for that particular site is involved, or (3) the data discrepancy is a result of sampling problems noted during TRC's oversight effort; and

• to evaluate the data comparison results in light of the overaU conclusions of the RI report and the regulatory framework for the field investigation program.

3.0 SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON PROCEDURE

EPA has not pubUshed guidance pertaining to the quantitative comparison of spUt samples which are analyzed by two different laboratories. Consequendy, TRC has developed a comparison procedure that calculates the relative percent difference (RPD) of detected compounds in each data set The RPD is calculated by taking the absolute value of the difference between the two concentration values and then dividing this value by their average. This value is then multiplied by 100. A quantitative comparability goal, which originated from Region II data vaUdation guidance for the evaluation of field dupUcates, is then appUed to the calculated RPD to evaluate the comparabiUty of the spUt samples. The comparabiUty goal for organic results and inorganic results equal to or above five times the contract required quantitation limit (CRQL) for organics and five times the contract required detection limit (CRDL) for inorganics, is-a RPD of 50 percent for water samples and 100 percent for soil samples. For inorganic results where one or both spUt sample results are below five times the

NY-067.RP5 3

RECYCLED PAPERb a, -5 i a g ^ ^ ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL ' F f ^ ^

^- 300810

CRDL, the comparabiUty goal is an absolute difference of less than the CRDL for water samples and less than twice the CRDL for soUs.

For resiUts that were outside the quantitative comparabiUty goal, professional judgement was used to determine if a data useabiUty problem existed. GeneraUy, data would be considered to have a useabUity problem if the foUowing additional conditions were encountered: (1) if one or both results were above the CRQL/CRDL and were outside the comparabiUty goal; (2) if the compound or analyte was detected by EPA/TRC at a concentration above the CRDL and was not detected by Golder's laboratory; and (3) if the EPA/TRC result was significantly greater than the Golder result.

4.0 RESULTS OF DATA COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Quantitative analytical data comparisons for spUt samples obtained at the Cortese LandfiU are presented in Appendix A. Data comparisons for soU and sediment samples coUected are presented in Tables A-la (volatUe organics). A-lb (semi-volatile organics), A-lc (pesticides/PCBs) and A-ld (inorganics). Data comparisons for ground water and surface water samples collected are presented in Tables A-2a (volatUe organics), A-2b (semi-volatUe organics), A-2c (pesticides/PCBs) and A-2d (inorganics). Results of the spUt sample comparison results are discussed below.

The overaU data comparabiUty for soU/sediment analysis at the Cortese LandfiU site was generaUy acceptable. As indicated in Table 2, TRC determined 9 of the 32 soil/sediment split sample data sets to have inadequate data comparability. A brief description of the incomparable analyses is provided below.

• Methylene chloride was detected by EPA/TRC in one sediment spUt sample, SL-1, at 88,000 micrograms per kilograms (ug/kg) and Golder detected this analyte at 9,600 ug/kg resulting in an RPD of 161.

• Acetone was detected in five of the soil/sediment spUt samples (R3-07, R4-12, SS-22, SS-13, and SS-15) by EPA/TRC at concentrations ranging from 6 ug/kg to 32 ug/kg. The Golder analysis at these locations did not detect this analyte.

• Phenanthrene was detected in one sediment spUt sample at R3-07 by EPA/TRC at 200 ug/kg and detected at 62 ug/kg by Golder resulting in an RPD of 105.

• Dieldrin was detected at one subsurface spUt soU sample SL-1 by EPA/TRC at 19 ug/kg and detected by Golder at 3.6 ug/kg resulting in an RPD of 136.

• Methoxychlor was detected at SS-13 by EPA/TRC at 27 ug/kg and this analyte was not detected by Golder.

• Chromium was detected at two soil/sediment split samples, R4-12 and SS-21 by EPA/TRC at 13 milUgrams per kilograms (mg/kg) and 10.5 mg/kg and

NY-067.RP5 4

RECYCLED P| l# i i l f | l | f ! ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL.

t TRC

Golder detected these analytes at 5 mg/kg for both samples resulting in an RPD of 89 and 71, respectively.

• Copper was detected at two soil/sediment spUt samples, R4-12 and SS-15, by EPA/TRC at 26 mg/kg and 48.4 mg/kg and Golder detected these analytes at 5.8 mg/kg and 14 mg/kg resulting in an RPD of 127 and 110, respectively.

• Lead was detected at two soil/sediment spUt samples, SS-21 and SL-1, by EPA/TRC at 4.3 mg/kg and 33.4 mg/kg and Golder detected these analytes at 1.9 mg/kg and 4.6 mg/kg resulting in an RPD of 77 and 152, respectively.

The overaU data comparabUity for ground water and surface water analysis at the Cortese LandfiU site was generaUy acceptable. As indicated in Table 2, TRC determined that 5 of the 20 ground water/surface water spUt sample data sets have inadequate data comparabiUty. As discussed in the Cortese LandfiU RI Report and TRC's Field Oversight Report, Golder did not sample for PCB/pesticides in any ground water weUs. PCB/pesticide results for EPA/TRC ground water spUt samples were all non-detections. A brief description of the incomparable analyses is provided below.

Chloroethane was detected by EPA/TRC in MW-IB at 4 ug/L and was not detected by Golder.

1,1-Dichloroethane was detected by EPA/TRC in MW-IB at 13 ug/L and was not detected by Golder.

1,1,1-Trichloroethane was detected by EPA/TRC in MW-IB at 2 ug/L and was not detected by Golder.

Trichloroethene was detected by EPA/TRC in MW-IB at 1 ug/L and was not detected by Golder.

Benzene was detected by EPA/TRC in MW-IB at 9 ug/L and was not detected by Golder.

1,3-Dichlorobenzene was detected by EPA/TRC in MW-IB at 3 ug/L and was not detected by Golder.

1,2-Dichlorobenzene was detected by EPA/TRC in MW-IB at 5 ug/L and was not detected by Golder.

Phenol and 4-methylphenol was detected by EPA/TRC in SW-11 at 27ug/L and 75 ug/L, respectively and were not detected by Golder.

Chromium was detected by EPA/TRC in MW-IB and MW-2B at 13 ug/L and 38 ug/L, respectively, and was not detected by Golder.

NY-067.RP5

RECYCLED PAPER * '

.{

I i » ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL 300613 TRC

TABLE 2. CORTESE LANDFILL - SPLIT SAMPLES DISPLAYING INADEQUATE COMPARABILITY

Sample Location (Depth)

1 MW-IB

1MW-2B

| M W - 6 B

1 SW-11

1 SW-12

|sS-13(0-0.5')

|sS-15(0-0.5')

|sS-21(0-0.5')

SS-22(0-0.5')

SL-l(3-3.5')

R2-05(0-.5')

|R3-07(0-.5 ')

|R4-12(0-.5 ')

Dale Coaected

04-14-93

04-15-93

04-15-93

06-08-93

06-09-93

04-15-93

04-13-93

06-08-93

06-09-93

06-09-93

06-10-93

06-10-93

06-10-93

Matrix

ground water

ground water

ground water

surface water

surface water

soU

soU

sediment

sediment

sediment

sediment

sediment

sediment

VoJatries

X

X

Bf As

X

X

FestJPCBB

X

X

Inorganics

X

X

X

X 1 X 1

1 X X

X 1

BNAs - Base-neutral acid-extractables. X - The split sample data were not comparable.

NY-067.RP5

RECYCLED PAPER

Q

ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL

300813 TRC

Arsenic was detected by EPA/TRC in SW-12 at 52.1 ug/L and was not detected by Golder.

• Cyanide was detected by EPA/TRC in MW-IB at 11 ug/L and was not detected by Golder.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A total of three ground water spUt samples were coUected from monitoring wells MW-IB, MW-2B, and MW-6B and boring SL-1 located near the eastern septage lagoon, two split sediment samples from SS-13 and SS-15 within the Cortese landfiU property boundaries, two split surface water and their respective sediment samples from SW-ll/SS-21 and SW-12/SS-22 located in White's Pond, and three sediment spUt samples designated as R2-05, R3-07, and R4-12 from three reaches along the Delaware River.

Each of these spUt samples were analyzed for volatUe organic compounds, BNAs, PCBs/pesticides, and inorganics. The results of these analyses indicate that 14 of the 52 sample data sets were not comparable. The majority of the non-comparable results were from the inorganic analyses. Based on the results of the comparison analysis, the foUowing recommendations are made:

• All analyses exhibiting inadequate comparability should be confirmed for acciuracy by Golder.

• EPA should note the above analytical discrepancies for future users of the Golder data set

NY-067.RP5 7

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL TRC «800£ 300814

NY-067.RP5 8

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL

naooe 300815 "^^^

APPENDIX A

DATA COMPARISON ANALYSES

NY-067.RP5 A-1

RECYCLED PAPER • . . , ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL T t ^ ^

m m m 300816

NY-067.RP5 A-2

RECYCLED PAPER YCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAl ^ ^ .^ ^ ^ f K ^ ^

aiaooe jiOiOSiT T i f t •• 4 S J

Table A-1 a SPUT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL VOLATILE ORGANICS IN SOIUSEDIMENT (ug/Kg)

Page 1 of 3

Mm RPD mmm RPD i»-i2 RPD

o o 00

00

Chloromethane Bromomethane

Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene Chloride Acetone Carbon Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene

1,1 DIchloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) Chloroform 1,2-Dichioroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Bromodichloromethane 1,2-DichlorQpropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Styrene Xylene (total)

EPA/TRC PRP EPA/TRC PRP

BGE85

11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 16U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U t l U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 u 11 u 11 u 11 u 11 u 11 u 11 u

BGE86

13 U 13 U 13 U 13U

17 UJ 18 UJ 13U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 UJ 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 UJ 13 U 13 UJ 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13U 13 U 13 U

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

14U 14U

14 U 14U 20 U 16J 14 U 14U

14U 14U 14 U 14U 14U 14 U 14U 14U 14 U 14U 14U 14 U 14U 14U 14 U 14U 14 U 14U 14U 14U

14U 14 U 14 U 14U 14U

16U 16U 16 U 18U 18U 16 UJ 16U 16U

16U

16 U 16U 16 U 16U 16 U 16U 16 U 16 U 16U 6 J

16U 16U 16U 16U 16U 16U 18U 3 J

16 U 16U 16U 16 U 16U 16U

EPA/TRC BGE87

PRP


12U 12U 12U 12U 21 U 12J 12U 12 U

12U

12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12 U

12U 12U 12 U 12U

12 U

11 U 11 U 11U 11 U 45 U 34 UJ 11 U 11U 11U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 u 11 u 11 u 11U 11 u 11 u


U •= Analyte was nol-detected at the concentration listed. J a Quantitation Is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD B Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected In both samples ' o Results outside the quantitative comparability goal tor split samples - RPD > 100% + = Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC but not by the PRP NR = Data point was not reported NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability goal was not neccessary

» \

o o c^

e o C5>

iff * i

Table A-1 a


Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene Chloride

Acetone

Carbon Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-DIchloroethane

1,2-Dichloroethene (total) Chloroform 1,2-Dichioroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride

Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Dichioropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Styrene Xylene (total)

SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL VOLATILE ORGANICS IN SOIUSEDIMENT (ug/Kg)

dd-21 EPA/TRC

BGE88

14 U 14U 14 U 14 U 14 U 17 UJ

14U 14 U 14U

14 U 14 U 14U 14 U 14 U 14 U 14U 14U 14 U 14 U U U 14 U 14U 14 U 14U 14 U 14 U 14 U 14U

14 U 14U 14U 14 U 14 U

PRP

23 UJ 23 UJ

23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 45 UJ

23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ

23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ

23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ 23 UJ

RPD

NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

siîiiiliiili EPA/TRC

BGE92

13U 13U

13U 13 U 14U 32 J 13U 13U 13U

13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U

13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13 U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13 U 13U 13U

13U 13U 13U 13U 13U

PRP

12 UJ 12U 12U 12U 12 UJ 12 UJ

12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12 UJ 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U

12U 12 UJ 12 UJ 12U 12U

12U 12U 12U 12U 12U

Page 2 of 3

RPD

NA NA

NA NA NA NA +

NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

sbi EPA/TRC

BGE93

29000 UJ 29000 U 29000 U 29000 U 88000 29000 UJ 29000 U 29000 UJ 17000 J

8700 J 29000 U 29000 U 29000 U 29000 29000 U 29000 U 29000 U 29000 U

690000 J 29000 U 29000 U 29000 U 29000 U

29000 U 29000 UJ 29000 U

180000 29000 U

220000 J 29000 U

110000 29000 U

410000

PRP

2100 U 2100 U 2100 U

2100 R 9600 2100 UJ 2100 U 2100 U 8600

7600 2100 U 2100 U 2100 UJ

14000 2100 U 2100 U 2100 U 2100 U

440000 2100 U 2100 U

450 J . 2100 U

2100 U 2100 U 2100 U

130000 2100 U

180000 2100 U

82000 2100 U

320000

RPD

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

67

13 NA NA NA

70 NA NA NA NA

44 NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA

32 NA

20 NA

29 NA

25

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed J > Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected In both samples * 3 Results outside the quantitative comparability goal for split samples - RPD > 100% + = Analyte was delected by EPA/TRC but not by the PRP NR = Data point was not reported. NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability goal was not necces^

' #

¥9

CO

OD

Table A-1 a SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL VOLATILE ORGANICS IN SOIUSEDIMENT (ug/Kg)

|S3-1$ 1

Chloromethane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene Chloride Acetone

Cartxjn Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) Chloroform

1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride

Bromodichloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

Trichloroethene

Dibromochloromethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Benzene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Toluene

Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Styrene

Xylene (total)

EPAn-RC

BGE90

13U 13U 13 U 13U 13U 23 J 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13 U 13U 13 U 13U

13U 13U 13U

13U

13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13 U 13 U 13U 13U 13 U 13 U

13U

PRP

13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 UJ 13 UJ 13 U 13 UJ 13 UJ 13 U 13 U 13 UJ 13 U 13 U

13 U 13U 13U

13 U

13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 UJ 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13 U

13 U

RPD

NA NA NA NA NA NA + NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii EPAn"RC

BGE91

13U 13U 13 U 13U 13U 6 J

13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13 U 13 U 13 U 13U

13U 13 U 13 U

13U

13U 13U 13 U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13 U 13U 13U 13U 13 U

13U 13U

PRP

13U 13U

13 U

13 U 15U 22 UJ 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13 U 13 UJ 13U 13U

13U 13 U 13U

13U

13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13 UJ 13 U 13 U 13U 13U 13 U 13U

13U

Page 3 of 3

RPD

NA NA NA NA NA NA + NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J = Quantitation Is approximate due lo limilalions identified during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD - Relative percent dillerence; RPD is calculated only when analytes are delected in both samples * • RBSUHB outside the quantitative comparability goal for split samples - RPD > 100% + » Analyte was delected by EPA/TRC but not by the PRP. NR = Data point was not reported. NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability goal was not neccessary

{Table A-1 b

j Analyte

Phenol bis(2-Chloro9lhyl)Ether 2-Chloroph6nol 1.3-Dichlorobdnzene 1.4-Dichlorob6nzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2-Mathylphenol 2,2'-Oxybis( 1 -Chloropropane) 4-Melhylphenol N-Nilroso-Di-n-Propylamine Hexachloroethana Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nitro phenol

2,4-DimBthylphBnol 1 Benzoic acid (1)

1 bis{2-Chlorosthoxy)Methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2,4-Trichlorcbenzene

1 Naphthalene

4-Chloroanilin9

Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2-Methylnaphthalene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2,4.6-Trichlorophenol 2.4.5-Trichloroph9nol 2-Chloronaphthalene 2-Nitroanilino

Dimethyl Phthalate

Acenaphthylene 2,6-Dinitrotolu9ne 3-Nitroaniline

Acenaphthene

2,4-Dinitroph6nol 4-Nitrophenol

Dibenzoturan

2.4-Dinitrotolu«ne Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phBnylether Flucrene 4-Nitroaniline

4,6-Dinitro-2-MeIhylphenol N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 4-8romopheny|-phenylether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Carbazole

Di-n-Butylphthalale Fluoranthene

Pyrene Butylbenzylphthalate

3.3'-Dichlorob6nzidin9 Benzo(a)Anthracen9 Chtysane

bis{2-Ethylhexy|)Phthalat9 Di-n-Octyl Phthalat9 BenzolbjFluorantnene

Benzo(k)Ruoranth9n9 Benzo(a)Pyr9n9 lnd9no(1.2,3-cd)Pyrene Dib9nz(a.h)Anthracene

Benzo(g,h,i)P9rylene

SPUT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDRIX SEMI-VOt.AT1LE ORGANICS IN SOIL/SEDIMENT (ug/Kg)

!HZ«oa 1 EPAH'RC BGE85

380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U

NR 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U

380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U

920 U 380 U 920 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 920 U

380 U

920 U 920 U 380 U 380 U

380 U 380 U 380 U 920 U 920 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 920 U 380 U 380 U 380 U

380 U

380 U 380 U 380 U

380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U

380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U 380 U

IPRP

430 U 430 U 430 U 430 U 430 U 430 U 430 U 430 UJ 430 U 430 U 430 U 430 U 430 U 430 U 430 U

4300 U

430 U 430 U 430 UJ 430 U 430 U

430 UJ 430 U 430 U 430 U, 430 U

1100U 430 U

1100U 430 U 430 U 430 U

1100U 430 U

1100 U

1100U 430 U 430 U 430 U

430 U 430 U

1100U 1100U 430 U 430 U

430 U 1100U

85 J 430 U 430 U

430 U

82 J 76 J

430 U 430 U

430 U . 430 U 430 U 430 U 64J

64J 430 U 430 UJ 430 UJ 430 UJ

JRPD

NA NA NA NA NA

U M

Uw NA NA NA NA NA NA

\HA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


NA

NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 ^ NA

NA NA

NA NA hW NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

:83M)ir EPAn-RC IPRP

{BGEBS 1

( 460 U j 460 U 1 460 U j 460 U

460 U 460 U 460 U 460 U 60J

1 460 U i 460 U j 460 U

460 U

460 U 460 U

NR

460 U 460 U 460 U 460 U 460 U

460 U 460 U 460 U 460 U

460 U 1100 U 460 U

1100U 460 U

460 U 460 U

1100U 460 U

1100U

1100U 460 U 460 U 64 J

460 U 460 U

1100U 1100U 460 U 460 U 460 U

1100U 200 J 460 U 460 U

460 U

230J 230 J 460 U 460 U

110J B8J

460 U 460 U 140 J 140 J

78J 51J

460 U 52 J

520 U 520 U 520 U

1 520 U 1 520 U

520 U 520 U 520 UJ 520 U

1 520 U 520 U 520 U 520 U 520 U 520 U

5200 U 520 U

520 U 520 UJ 520 U

520 U

520 UJ 520 U 520 U 520 U

520 U 1300 U 520 U

1300 U 520 U 520 U

520 U 1300 U 520 U

1300 U

1300 U 520 U

520 U 520 U

520 U 520 U

1300 U 1300 U 520 U 520 U 520 U

1300 U 62J

520 U 520 U

520 U 110J

too J 520 U 520 U 53J

520 U 520 U 520 U 99J

99J 520 U 520 UJ 520 UJ

520 UJ

Page 1 of 3

| H P D

NA NA NA NA NA IW NA NA NA + NA N4A NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA +

NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

1 0 5 ' NA NA NA

71

79 NA NA

70 NA + NA NA

34 34

NA + NA + NA NA t

fRWSis;;:;:;:;;;:; EPAn'RC BGE87

390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 4SJ

390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U

NR 390 U

390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U

390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U

390 U 950 U 390 U 950 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 950 U 390 U

950 U 950 U 390 U 390 U

390 U 390 U 390 U 950 U 950 U 390 U 390 U

• 390 U 950 U 390 U 390 U 390 U

390 U

390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U

390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U

390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U

JPRP

350 U 3S0U 350 U 350 U

4SJ 350 U 350 U 350 UJ 350 U 350 U 350 U 350 U 350 U 350 U 350 U

3500 U 350 U 350 U 350 UJ 350 U 350 U

350 U 350 U 350 U 350 UJ

350 U 850 U 350 U 850 U

• 350 U 350 U

350 U 850 U

350 U 850 U 850 U 350 U 350 U

350 U 350 U 350 U 850 U 850 U 350 U 350 U 350 U 850 U

47 J 350 U 350 U 350 U

60J 54J 43'J

350 U 350 U 350 U 350 U 350 U

350 U 350 U 350 U 350 UJ 350 UJ

• 350 UJ

iRPD

NA NA NA NA

0 NA NA NA NA I M NA NA NA


NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA I M

NA NA NA NA


U • Anatyto was not dvttctod al Ih* ooncvnration listad. J > Quantitibon is «pproximal» diw to (imilitrcns tdantifi»d during th« quality oontrd r«vT«M'. R • VaJu* was rsjactad dua to laboratory quaily conffol prcUams. RPD « Ralativa parcsnt diffar«noa; RPO is calouistad onty ot Mn onaJytss ara dstactad in both sampj« ' - Rasults outsida the cântilaliva oomparabiity god tcr split samptas - RPD > 10(rC •t- - Analyta was datoctod by EPA/TRC but not by t ia PRP, NR • Data poinl was not raportad. NA a Calculation ot a qjantitaliva comparatility god was not naocsssa/y.

1 -Banzoic add is not a TCL compound but anaiyzad by PRP

300821

Table A - l b

Analyte

1

Phenol tbis(2-Chlor09thyl)Eth9r

2-Chloroph9nol 1,3-DichlorobenzenB

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

1.2-0ich(orobenzene 2-Methylph9nol 2.2'-Oxybls(1 -Chloropropane)

4-Methylphenol N-Nitroso- Di-n-Propylamine HexachloroBthane Nitrobenzene isophorone

2-Nitrophenol 2.4-DimethylphBnol

Benzoic acid (1) bis(2-Chlcroethoxy)MethanB

2.4'DichlorophBnol

1,2,4-TnchlorobBnzBne NaphthalBne

4-Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene

4-Chtoro-3-Methylphenol 2-MethyinaphthalenB

1 H8xachlorocycloperTtadi9ne 2,4,6-TrichlQroph9not 2.4.5-Trichloroph9nol 2-Chloro naphthalene 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl Phthalate

Acenaphthylene

2.5-DinitrotoluenB 3-NitroaniiinB AcenaphthsnB

2.4-DiniIrophBnol

4-Nitrophenol Dibenzoturan 2.4-DinitrotoluenB

DiethyiphthalatB 4-Ch)oroph8nyl-phenylethBr

FluorenB

4-Nilroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol

N-NitrosodiphenylaminB 4-BromophBnyl-phenyl9thBr

HBxachlorobBnzenB

pBntachlorophenol

Phenanthrene Anthracene

Carbazole

Di-n-Butylphthalate

Fluoranthene


3.3'-Dichlorobenzidin9

Benzo(a)Anthracene

Chryseno bis(2-Ethylh9xyl)Phthalate

Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene

Benzo(k)Fluoranthen6 Benzo(a)Pyren9

lndeno{1,2.3-cd)Pyrene

Oibenz(a.h)Anthrao9n9 B9nzo(g,h,i)Perylen9

SPUT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS IN SOIUSEDHIENT (ug/Kg)

\ssmwmm • EPAn-RC

'BGEB8

470 UJ

j 470 UJ 1 470 UJ

i 470 UJ

76 J

470 UJ 470 UJ 470 UJ

1 470 UJ

470 UJ 470 UJ 470 UJ 470 UJ

470 UJ

1 470 UJ NR

470 UJ

470 UJ

' 470 UJ i 470 UJ

470 UJ 470 UJ

470 UJ 470 UJ

470 UJ 470 UJ

1100 UJ 470 UJ

1100 UJ 470 UJ

470 UJ

470 UJ 1100 UJ

470 UJ

1100 UJ

1100 UJ

470 UJ 470 UJ

470 UJ 470 UJ 470 UJ

1100 UJ

1100 UJ

470 UJ 470 UJ

470 UJ

1100 UJ

100 J

470 UJ 470 UJ

470 UJ

190 J

120 J 470 UJ

470 UJ

93J

67 J 470 UJ

470 UJ

110J 110J 64J

470 UJ

470 UJ

470 UJ

SSSSHS::;;?™;:®^^^^

PRP

710 U J

710UJ 710 UJ 710UJ

320 J

710 UJ 710UJ 710UJ

710UJ

710UJ 710UJ 710 UJ

710 UJ

710 UJ

710 UJ

7100 UJ

710UJ

710UJ

710 UJ 710UJ

710UJ 710UJ 710UJ 710UJ 710UJ 710UJ

1700UJ 710 UJ

1700 UJ

710 UJ

710 UJ

710 UJ 1700UJ

710UJ 1700 UJ

1700 UJ

710UJ 710UJ

710UJ 710UJ 710 UJ

1700UJ

1700UJ

710 UJ 710UJ

710UJ

1700UJ

200 J

710UJ 710UJ

710UJ

540 J

600 J 710 UJ

710 UJ

470 J

260 J 710 UJ

710 UJ

510J

510J 260 J

220 J

710UJ

290 J

RPD

NA

NA NA

NA

123"

NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

67

NA NA

NA

96

133-NA

NA 134-

118* NA

NA

129* 129* 121 •

NA

NA

NA

mammmmmmmmm EPA/TRC BGE92

430 UJ 430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ 430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ 430 UJ 430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ NR

430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ 430 UJ 430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ 430 UJ

1100 UJ 430 UJ

1100 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ 1100 UJ 430 UJ

1100 UJ

1100 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ 430 UJ

1100 UJ

1100 UJ 430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ

1100 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ 430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

430 UJ

PRP

400 U

400 U 400 U

400 U

400 U

400 U 400 U 400 UJ

59 J

400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U

400 U

400 U

4000 U

400 U

400 U

400 UJ 400 U

400 U 400 UJ 400 U 400 U

400 U 400 U 980 U 400 U

980 U 400 U

400 U

400 U 980 U

400 U 980 U

980 U

400 U 400 U

400 U

400 U 400 U

980 U-

980 U

400 U 400 U

400 U

980 U

400 U

400 U 400 U

400 U

400 U

400 U 400 U

400 U

400 U

400 U 400 U

400 U

400 U 400 U 400 U

400 U

400 U

400 U

Page 2 o< 3

RPD

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA I M NA

NA

NA

iammmm EPA/TRC BGE93

4000 UJ

4000 UJ 4000 UJ

4000 UJ

4000 UJ

4000 UJ 4000 UJ

4000 U

4000 UJ

4000 UJ 4000 UJ 4000 UJ 4000 UJ

4000 UJ

4000 UJ NR

4000 UJ

4000 UJ 4000 UJ

87000 J

4000 UJ

4000 UJ 4000 UJ

22000 J

4000 UJ 4000 UJ 9600 UJ 4000 UJ 9600 UJ

4000 UJ 930 J

4000 UJ 9600 UJ

27000 UJ

9600 UJ

9600 UJ

19000 J

4000 UJ

4000 UJ 4000 UJ

20000 J

9600 UJ

9600 UJ

4000 UJ 4000 UJ

4000 UJ

9600 UJ

62000 J

8700 J 12000 J

5200 J

28000 J

18000 J

4000 UJ

4000 UJ

7300 J

5200 J 2400 J

4000 UJ 4600 J

4600 J 1300 J 1300 J

550 J

1500 J

Wmiiimim PRP

160000 U

160000U 160000U

160000U

160000u

160000 u 160000 u 160000U

160000U

160000 U 160000 u 160000U 160000 U

160000u

160000U 3200000 U

160000U 160000u

160000 UJ 260000

160000U 160000 UJ

160000 U 46000 J

160000u 160000U 410000U 160000U 410000U

160000 u 160000U

160000U 410000U

51000 J

410000u

410000u

37000 J

160000U 160000U

160000 u 40000 J

410000U

410000U

160000U 160000u

160000 U

410000 U

140000 J

26000 J 17000 J

160000U

65000 J

41000 J 160000U

160000 U

160000U

160000 U 160000U

160000 U

160000U 160000U 160000U

160000 u

160000 u

160000 u

RPD

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

100

NA I M NA

74

NA

NA NA NA NA NA

I M +

NA NA

NA NA

NA

64

NA

NA NA

67

NA

I M

NA NA

NA

NA

77

100 34

I M +

80

78 NA

NA

NA +

NA + I M +

NA

NA + NA + NA +

NA +

NA +

NA +

U M Andyls was not datoctod at tha oonoanration listad. J M Quantitation is approximato dua to linitotions idantifiad durng tha quality oontrd raviaw. R • Valua was rajactad dua to iaboratcry qja i ty control problams. RPD - Ralativa parcant (ftffaranoa; RPD is caloulatad only whan anatytae ara datactad in both samplas. ' -Racul lB outsida tha quanbtaliva oomparabiity goal for splitsamphia - RPD > 100% *• - Analyta was datoctod by EPA/TRC but not b^ »ia PRP. NR > Data point was not raportad NA m Calculation of a quantitativa oomparabiiity goal was not naocassary.

1 'Banzoic add is not a TCL compowid but anaiyzad by PRP

300823

Table A - l b SPUT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS IN SOIUSEDIMENT (ug/Kg)

Page 3 of 3

Analyte SSiWSHSSS .•RPD EPA/TRC

Phenol bis(2-Chloro9thyl)Ether 2-Chloropnenol 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichtorabenzene 1,2-DichloroberTzene 2-M9thylph9nal 2.2'-0!tybis(1 -Chloropropang) 4-M9thylphenol N-NKroso-Di-n-Propylamine Hexachloroethane Nitrobenzene

Isophorone 2-Nitrophenot

2.4-Dimethylph9nol Benzoic acid (1) bis(2-ChloroethoxyjMethane

2,4-Dichloroph9nol

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzen9 Naphthalene

4-Chloroaniline

Hexachlorobutadiene

4-Chloro-3-M9thylphenol 2-Methylnaphthalene

Hexachlorocyclop9ntadi9ne

2,4,6-Trichloroph9nol

2,4,5-Trichloroph9nol 2-Chloronaphthalene

2-Nitroaniline

Dimethyl Phthalate

Acenaphthylene

2,6-DinitrotolU9n9 3-Nitroanilin9

Ac9naphth9n9

2.4-Dinitrophenol

4-Nitrophenol Dibenzoturan

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

Diethylphthalate

4-Chlorophonyl-ph9nylether Fluorene

4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-M9thylph9nol

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

4-B romo ph9nyl-ph9nylether

Hexachlorobenzene

Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Carbazole

Di-n-Butylphthalate

Fluoranthene


3,3'-Dichlorobenzidin9

B9nzo(a)Anthracane Chrysen9 bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate Di-n-Octyl Phthalate

B9nzo(bjFluoranthane

Benzo(k)Fluoranthene Benzo(a)Pyrene lndeno(1,2,3-od)Pyrene Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene

Benzo(g,h,i)Peryl9n9

BGE90

400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ

NR 400 UJ I 4O0UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 980 UJ 400 UJ 980 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 980 UJ 400 UJ 980 UJ 980 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ

R 980 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 980 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 UJ

msmmmm PRP


4000 UJ 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U. 400 U 980 U 400 U 980 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 980 U 400 U 980 U 980 UJ 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 980 U 980 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 980 UJ 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 UJ 400 UJ 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U 400 U

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA NA

NA

NA I M NA NA

NA

EPA/TRC BGE91

480 U 480 U 480 U 480 U

4aou 480 U 480 U 480 U 430 U 480 U 480 U 480 U 480U 480 U 480 UJ

NR 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 UJ 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 U

1200 U 480 U

1200 U 480 U 480 U 480 U

1200 U 480 U

1200 U 1200 U 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 U

R 1200 U 4S0U 480 U 480 U

1200 U 70J

480 U 480 UJ

25 J 5SJ 82J

380 J 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 UJ 480 UJ 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 U 480 U


4200 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U

1000 U 420 U

1000 U 420 U 420 U 420 U

1000 U 420 U 1000 U 1000 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U

1000 U 1000 U 420 U 420 U 420 U

1000 UJ 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U 420 U

RPD

NA


NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA

I M NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA I M NA NA

I M

NA NA NA NA

NA

U - Anajyto was not datoctod at tf>» conoenration iistad. J « Quantitation is afsproximato dua to limitilions idsntifiad durng the quaUty oonird raviaw. R * Valua was rafactad dua to labcralcry quaity (xntrol probJams, RPD « Rataliva parcant diffaranca; RPO is calculatad only wttan analytaa ara datactad in l30th sampta) ' « Rasults outsida (ha quaiibtativacomparabiity goal for split aamplas - RPD > 100% •. - Anatyta waa dalaclad by EPA/TRC tut not Ijy t ia PRP. NR > Data point was not ropoftod NA « Calculation of a qjantitativa oomparabiiity goal was not naccaeaary.

1 -Banzoic add is not a TCL compound but anaJyzad by PRP

SS80D! 300823

m m

CO

o OJ A»

Table A- lc

Analyte

alpha-BHC beta-BHC (delta-BHC Lindane Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide

Endosulfan 1 Dieldrin 4,4'-DDE Endrin Endosulfan II 4,4'-DDD Endosulfan sulfate 4,4'-DDT Methoxychlor Endrin ketone Endrin aldehyde afpha-Chlordane gamma-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248

Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL P E S T I C I D E / P C B S I N S O I L / S E D I M E N T (ug/Kg)

^^^^^K^^SmlmM EPA/TRC BGE85

1.9 U 1.9 U

0.4 J 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 3.8 U 3.8 U 3.8 U 3.8 U 3.8 U 3.8 U 3.8 U 19U

3.8 U

0.84 J 1.9 U 1.9 U 190 U 38 U 77 U 38 U 38 U 38 U 38 U

38 U

PRP

2.3 U

2.3 U 2.3 U 2.3 U 2.3 U 2.3 U 2.3 U 2.3 U 4.4 U 4.4 U 4.4 U 4.4 U 4-4 U 4.4 U 4.4 U 23 U

4.4 U

4.4 U 2.3 U 2.3 U 230 U 44 U 89 U 44 U 44 U

44 U 44 U 44 U

RPD

NA

NA NA -I-NA NA NA NA NA


NA -1-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Wmm^mmmmm EPA/TRC BGE86

2.4 U 2.4 U 2.4 U 2.4 U 2.4 U 2.4 U 2.4 U 2.4 U 4.6 U

R R

4.6 U 4.6 U 4.6 U 4.6 U 4.6 U 4.6 U

4.6 U R

2.4 U 240 U 46 U 93 U 46 U 46 U 46 U 46 U 46 U

PRP

2.7 U

2.7 U 2.7 U 2.7 U 2.7 U 2.7 U 2.7 U 2.7 U 5.2 UJ 5.2 U 5.2 U 5.2 U 5.2 U 5.2 U 5.2 U 27 UJ 5.2 U 5.2 U 2.7 U 2.7 U

270 U 52 U

110U 52 U 52 U

52 U 52 U 52 U

Page 1 of 3

RPD


NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

iiliiiiiiiiii« ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ EPA/TRC BGE87

2U 2U 2U 2U 2U

0.075 J 2U 2U

3.9 U 0.19 J 3.9 U 3.9 U 3.9 U 3.9 U 3.9 U 20 U 3.9 U

3.9 U 2U

R 200 U 39 U 80 U 39 U 39 U 39 U 39 U 39 U

PRP

1.8 U 1.8 U 1.8 U 1.8 U 1.8 U 1.8 U 1.8 U 1.8 U

3.5 UJ 3.5 U 3.5 U 3.5 U 3.5 U 3.5 U 3.5 U 18 UJ

3.5 U

3.5 U 1.8 U 1.8 U 180 U 35 U 72 U 35 U 35 U

35 U 35 U 35 U

RPD

NA

NA NA NA NA NA + NA

NA NA NA + NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


NA NA NA

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J = Quantitation Is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD Is calculated only when analytes are detected In both sample * = Results outside the quantitative comparability goal for split samples - RPD > 100% + = Analyte was delected by EPA/TRC but not by the PRP. NR = Data point was not reported. NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability goal was not neccessary.

Table A- lc S P L I T S A M P L E C O M P A R I S O N - CORTESE LANDFILL

P E S T I C I D E / P C B S I N S O I L / S E D I M E N T (ug/Kg)

Page 2 of 3

Analyte !$S-21 RPD SS-22 RPD wm RPD

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC Lindane Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 4,4'-DDE Endrin Endosulfan II 4,4'-DDD Endosulfan sulfate 4,4'-DDT Methoxychlor Endrin ketone Endrin aldehyde alpha-Chlordane gamma-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Arodor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

EPA/TRC PRP EPA/TRC BGE88

R 2.4 UJ 2.4 UJ 2.4 UJ 2.4 UJ

R 2.4 UJ 2.4 UJ 4.7 UJ

0.56 J 4.7 UJ 4.7 UJ 4.7 UJ

R 4.7 UJ 4.7 UJ

0.11 J 4.7 UJ

0.092 J 2.4 UJ 240 U

47 U 95 U 47 U 47 U 47 U 47 U 47 U

3.8 UJ 3.8 UJ 3.8 UJ 3.8 UJ 3.8 UJ 3.8 UJ 3.8 UJ 3.8 UJ 7.5 UJ 7.5 UJ 7.5 UJ 7.5 UJ 7.5 UJ 7.5 UJ 7.5 UJ 38 UJ 7.5 UJ

7.5 UJ 3.8 UJ 3.8 UJ

380 UJ 75 UJ

150 U J 75 UJ 75 UJ 75 UJ 75 UJ 75 UJ

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

BGE92

R 2.2 UJ 2.2 UJ 2.2 UJ 2.2 UJ

0.07 J 2.2 UJ 2.2 UJ

R 4.3 UJ 4.3 UJ 4.3 UJ 4.3 UJ 4.3 UJ 4.3 UJ

22 UJ 4.3 UJ 4.3 UJ 2.2 UJ

R 220 UJ 43 UJ 88 UJ 43 UJ 43 UJ 43 UJ 43 UJ 43 UJ

PRP EPAn"RC

2.1 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 4.0 U 4.0 U 4.0 U 4.0 U 4.0 U 4.0 U 4.0 U 21 UJ 4.0 U

4.0 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 210 U

40 U 82 U 40 U 40 U 40 U 40 U 40 U


BGE93

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J = Quantitation Is approximate due lo limitations Identified during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are delected in both samples. * = Results outside the quantitative comparability goal for split samples - RPD > 100% + = /\nalyte was detected by EP/\/TRC but not by the PRP^ NR = Data point was not reported. NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability goal was in^pbcessary.

R R

I U N 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ

3.6 J 10 UJ 19J

R 25 J 20 UJ 20 UJ 20 UJ 13J

100 UJ R R

29 J 10 UJ

1000 UJ 200 UJ 400 UJ 200 UJ 200 UJ 200 UJ 200 UJ 200 UJ

PRP

R 3.2 J

R R R R R R

3.6 J R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R


136 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

CO

o

Table A-1 c SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL PESTICIDE/PCBs IN SOIL/SEDIMENT (ug/Kg)

Page 3 of 3

CO o o 00

Analyte

alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC

Lindane Heptachlor

Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 4,4'-DDE Endrin Endosulfan II 4,4'-DDD Endosulfan sulfate 4,4'-DDT Methoxychlor Endrin ketone Endrin aldehyde alpha-Chlordane gamma-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Arocior-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

^mm EPA/TRC BGE90

2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 4.0 UJ 4.0 UJ 4.0 UJ 4.0 UJ 4.0 UJ

4.0 UJ

7.1 J 27 J 4.0 UJ 4.0 UJ

2.1 UJ 2.1 UJ 210 UJ 40 UJ 82 UJ 40 UJ 40 UJ 40 UJ 40 UJ 40 UJ

PRP

J_

2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 4.2 UJ 4.2 U 4.2 UJ 4.2 U 4.2 U

4.2 U 4.3 J 22 U 4,2 U 4.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U

220 U 42 U 85 U 42 U 42 U 42 U 42 U 42 U

RPD

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

S3-15 EPA/TRC BGE91

49


2.5 U 2.5 U 2.5 U 2.5 U 2.5 U 2.5 U 2.5 U 2.5 U 4.8 U 4.8 U 4.8 U 4.8 U

PRP

2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 2.2 U 4.2 U 4.2 U 4.2 U 4.2 U

4.8 U 4.8 U 4.8 U 25 U 4.8 U 4.8 U

2.5 U 2.5 U 250 U 48 U 97 U 48 U

48 U 48 U 48 U 48 U

4.2 U 4.2 U 4.2 U 22 UJ 4.2 U 4.2 U

2.2 U 2.2 U 220 U 42 U 85 U 42 U 42 U 42 U 15J 42 U

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality conUd review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. * = Results outside the quantitative comparability goal for split samples - RPD > 100% + = Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC but not by the PRP. NR = Data point was not reported. NA = Calculation ol a quantitative comparability goal was not neccessary.

CO

o CO

Table A-1 d

Analyte

Aluminum

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Niclêl Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL INORGANICS IN SOIL (mg/kg)

CRDL

40 12 2

40

1 1

100 2 4 5

20 0.6

1000 3

0.04 8

1000 1 2

1000 2

10 4 2

j | | | | | i | | | | | | ^ ^ 1 EPAH-RC MBHL85

4580 6.3 UJ 2.6 J

51.5 0.23 U 0.7 U 317 4.6 4.3 4.9

9100 8.9 J

1600 288

0.12 U 7.6 736 0.7 1.6U

89.9 0.7 U 4.8

31.8 0.58 U

PRP

4350.00 12.20 U

1.80 33.40 J

0.53 U 1.30 U

442.00 2.90 3.30 6.60 U

9170.00 5.30 J

1720.00 231.00

0.13 U 8.20 UJ

693.00 0.80 UJ 2.70 U

49.20 1.10U 3.60

41.10 R 0.66 U

RPD

5 NA

36 43

NA NA NA

45 NA NA

1 51

7 22


"^^^^^^^^^^K^S,! EPA/TRC MBHL86

5050

7.1J 7.8 J

54.7 0.27 0.79 U 292 5.2 7.9 5.8

9300 6.1 N

1840 307 0.13 U

9.7 835

0.79 U 1.8 U

87.9 0.79 U

5.1 36.5 0.66 U

PRP

3990.00

11.40 UJ 9.20

53.90

0.32 U 1.60 U

451.00 4.50 5.00 5.70

10100.00 7.40

1570.00 331.00

0.16 U 8.10

641.00 0.95 UJ 2.20 U

79.40 U 1.30 U 2.70

35.90 R 0.79 U

Page 1 of 3

RPD

23 NA -I-

16 1

NA NA NA

14 NA NA

8 NA

16 8


W ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ M EPATFRC MBHL87

10600

6.7 UJ 3.5 J

65.1 0.5

0.74 U 621

13 11.8

26 18600

6.1 J 3480

751 0.12 U 18.4 1000 0.74 U

1.7U 186

0.74 U 10.6 90.9 0.62 U

PRP

4240.00 7.70 UJ 3.80

47.00 0.24 1.10U

300.00 5.00 6.10 5.80

9580.00 6.30

1570.00 245.00 R

0.11 U 7.60

527.00 0.65 UJ 1.50 U

54.00 U 0.86 U 2.60

32.30 R 0.54 U

RPD

86 NA

8 32

NA NA NA

89* NA

127* 64

3 76

NA NA

83 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

U = Analyte was not detectetd at the concentration listetd. J = Quantitation is approximate cJue to limitations identified during the quality control review R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. * = Results outside the quantitative comparability goal for split samples - either the RPD > 100% or one or both split samples had a concentration < 5 x CRDL and an absolute difference > 2 x CRDL + = Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC and not b ^ ^ ^ R P NR = Data point was not reported ^ ^ B NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability go^âs not neccessary,

e ^

CO

00

Table A- ld

Analyte

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium

Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver

Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc

Cyanide

CRDL

40 12 2

40

1 1

100 2 4 5

20 0.6

1000 3

0.04 8

1000 1 2

1000 2

10 4 2

SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL INORGANICS IN SOIL (mg/kg)

iiiliiiiii EPAn-RC MBHL88

10100 J 12.8 UJ 10.2 J 174 J

0.61 J 1.4 UJ

1150J 10.5 J 9.7 J

17.5 J 16400 J

20.9 J 2890 J

693 J 0.24 UJ 17.3 J

1500 J 1.4 UJ 3.3 UJ 187 J 1.4 UJ 12J

91.1 J 1.2 UJ

^;:;:S^^^^SS^^^^î:^^v'^yo^^--^-:S>^

PRP

7590.00 J 21.10 UJ 9.90 J

126.00 J

1.70 J 2.30 UJ

1060.00 J 5.00 J 4.10 UJ

11.40 UJ 14000.00 J

20.20 J 2040.00 J

559.00 R 0.23 UJ

14.20 UJ 1820.00 J

1.40 U 4.60 UJ

89.50 J 1.80 UJ 8.80 J

77.50 R 14.40 J

RPD

28 NA

3 32

94 NA

8 7 1 *

NA -1-NA -1-

16 3

34 NA NA NA -1-

19 NA NA

71 NA

31 NA NA

iiiiiiiiii EPA/TRC MBHL92

20.3 6.6 J

3J 1.7U

0.24 U 0.73 U

41 U 1.2U 1.5U 1.5U 2.9 4.3 J

41.5 U 0.24 U 0.12 U

3.6 U 111 U

0.73 U 1.7U

52.9 U 0.73 U

1.2U 0.49 U 0.61 U

T^mimm mmm.

PRP

5720.00 11.20 U 2.50 J

108.00 J 1.20 1.20 U

18600.00 J 4.10 3.20 6.10 U

10700.00 1.90 J

1690.00 305.00 R

0.12 U 7.50 UJ

1080.00 0.73 UJ 2.40 U

131.00 0.97 U 4.50

33.60 R 0.61 U

Page 2 of 3

RPD

NA NA +

18 NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

77* NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA

siiiiiiii EPA/TRC MBHL93

6480 7.8 UJ 7.6 J

52.2

0.33 0.87 U 408 5.7 7.9 5.9

13500 33.4 J 2850

332 0.39 13.7 132 U

0.87 U 2 U

87.4 0.87 U

4.9 43.7

1.1

lllll illlllli PRP

12800.00 16.30 U 8.10

85.50 J 0.85 1.80 U

1040.00 15.70 12.90 42.50 J

22000.00 4.60 J

3610.00 595.00 R

0.37 R 22.90 J

2020.00 10.60 UJ 3.50 U

232.00 1.40 U

13.90 202.00

0.89 U

RPD

NA NA

6 NA NA NA NA

93* NA NA

48 152* 24

NA NA

50 NA NA NA NA NA NA

129* NA -h

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculatad only when analytes are detected in both samples. * = Results outside the quantitative comparability goal for split samples - either the RPD > 50% or one or both split samples had a concentration < 5 x CRDL and an absolute difference > 2 x CRDL + = Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC and not by the PRP NR = Data point was not reported NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability goal was not neccessary.

O o

Table A - l d SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON INORGANICS IN SOIL (mg/kg)

CORTESE LANDFILL Page 3 of 3

o o 00

Analyte

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Vanadium Zinc Cyanide

CRDL

40 12 2

40 1 1

100 2 4 5

20 0.6

1000 3

0.04 8

1000 1 2

1000 2

10 4 2

SS'13 EPA/TRC

MBHL90

3970 3UJ

2.8 42.8 0.27 0.51 U 863 3.7 5.9 9.9 J

8560 12.1 J 1940

394 0.11 U

8.7 460 0.24 U 0.54 U 71.9

0.1 U 3.3

41.2 J 0.12 U

PRP

5880.00 11.80 UJ 4.90

52.70 0.51 U 1.30 U

939.00 9.20 J 6.90

12.30 J 13400.00

11.30 J 2190.00 423.00 J

0.13 UJ 11.10

1450.00 0.77 U 2.60 U

83.90 1.00 U 7.00

44.90 0.64 U

RPD

39 NA

55 NA NA NA NA

85 ' NA

22 44

7 12 7


9 NA

88-15 EPA/TRC

MBHL91

6990 3.5 UJ 4.8

52.2 0.34 0.58 U 696 7.5 9.1

48.4 J 16300

18.6 J 2460

565 0.12 U 16.5 581 0.28 U 0.61 U 84.6 0.14

8 88.1 J 0.51

PRP

6900.00 11.80 UJ 4.50

41.30 0.51 U 1.30 U

573.00 10.20 J 5.40

14.00 J 13900.00

13.70 J 2060.00 346.00 J

0.13 UJ 11.70

737.00 0.77 U 2.60 U

87.50 1.00 U 7.80

67.00 0.75

RPD

1 NA

6 NA NA NA NA

31 NA

110* 16 30 18 48

NA 34

NA NA NA NA NA NA

27 NA

U = Analyte was not defected at the concentration listed. J = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. * = Results outside the quantitative comparability goal for split samples -• either the RPD > 50% or one or both split samples had a concentration < 5 x CRDL and an absolute difference > 2 x CRDL + = Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC and not b^ jM PRP NR = Data point was not reported ^ ^ B NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability g M R a s not neccessary.

€*5 €0 O O

CO o o CO

Table A-2a

Analyte

Chloromethane

Bromomethane .

Vinyl Chloride

Chloroethane Methylene Chloride Acetone

Carbon Disullide

1,1-Dichloroelhene

1,1-Dichloroethane

cis-1,2-Dichloroelhene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichloro6thane

2-Bulanone

1,1,1-Trichloroethane Caibon Tetrachloride


cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene

Dibromochloromethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene

trans-l .S-Dlchloropropene Bromoform

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone

Tetrachloroethene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Toluene

Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Styrene

Xylene (total)

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene

1,2-Dibromoethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene

SPUT SAMPLE COMPARISON - SErCORTESE LANDFILL

VOLATILE ORGANICS IN WATER (ug/L)

m' ^ 1 EPA/TRC

SB3547

1U

1 U

1 U

1 U 2 U

R

1 U 1U

1 U

1 U 1U

1 U 1 U

9 J

1 U 1 u

1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u

1 u

1 u 1 U

1U 1U 5 U

R 1 U

1 U

1 U

1 U 1 U 1U

1 u 1 u

1 U

1 J

1 u 1 u

PRP

1U

1U

1 U

1U

1U

R

1U

1U 1U

1 U 1U

1U

1 u

R

1 U 1 U

1 u 1 UJ 1U

1 u

1 u

1U 1U

1U

1U 5 U

R 1U

1 U 1 U

1 U 1 U 1U

1 u 1 u

1U

1U

NR 1 U

RPD

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA

rA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA +

NA NA

$W-U \ EPA/TRC

SB3548

1U

1U

1 U

1 U 2 U

R

1 U

1 U

1 U 1 U 1U

1 U 1 U

R 1 U 1 U 1U

1 U 1 U 7 U

1 U

1U

2 U

1 U 1 U SU

R

U

1 U

1 U

1 U 1 U

1 U

1 U 1 U

O.SJ

4

1 U 0.8 J

PRP

1 UJ

1 U

1 U

1 U 3UJ

R 1 U

1 U 3

1 U 1 U

1 U 1 U

R 1 U 1 U

1 U 1 UJ 1 U 5

1 U

1 U

1

1U 1 U

1 u

R 0.6 J

1 U

1 U

0,9 J 1 U

1U

1 U

R

1U 3

NR 0.6 J

RPD

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

50

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA +

29

NA

29

w«ii:iiiiilii^^ EPAyTRC

SB3543

1 U

1 U

1UJ

4 J

1 U

R 1 U

1 U 13J

1 U 1 U

1 U 1 U

R 2 J 1 U

1 U 1 U

1 U 1 J

1 U

1 U

9 J

1U

1 U 5 U 5 U

l U

1 U 38 J

11 J 17J

1 U

50 J 1 U

3 J 15J

1 U 5 J

PRP

28 UJ

28 U

28 UJ

28 U 56 UJ

140 R

28 U

28 U 28 U

28 U 28 U

28 U 28 UJ

140 R 28 U 28 U

28 U 28 U 28 U 28 U

28 UJ

28 U 28 U

28 U 28 U

140 R 140 R

28 U

28 U

610

14J 24 J

28 U

79 28 U

28 U

22 J

1 U 28 U

RPD

NA

NA

NA

NA +

NA NA

NA

NA

NA +

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA + NA

NA NA

NA NA +

NA

NA

NA +

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA 177*

24 34

NA 45

NA

NA + 38

NA NA +

U - Analyte was not dotsctod at the conoentration listed. J - Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R - Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD - Relative percent difference: RPD Is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. * • Results outside the quantitative oomparabiiity goal for split samples - RPD > 50% * m Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC but not by the PRP. NR - Data point was not reported. NA - Calculation of a quantitative comparability goal was not neccessary

Table A-2a SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON - SEICORTESE LANDFILL VOLATILE ORGANICS IN WATER (ug/L)

Analyte


Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane

Methylene Chloride Acetone

Carbon Disulfide

1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1.Dichloroethane

cis-1,2-Dichteroethene

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone

1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride


cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene

Dibromochloromethane

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Benzene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone

Tetrachloroethene

1,1,2,2-Telrachloroef hane Toluene Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene

Styrene Xylene (total) • 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorotienzene

1,2-Dibromoethane 1.2-Dichlorobenzene

Mw.«e 1 EPA/TRC

SB3544

1 U

1U

1 UJ 4

1 U

R 1 U

1 U 20

1 U 1 U

1U 1 U

R

1 U 1 U

1U 1U

1 U 1 u

1 u

1 u 3

1 U 1 u 5 U 5 U

1 U 1U

1 U 1 U 1 U

1 U

1 U 1 U

2 9

1 U 1 U

PRP

1U

1 U

1 U 3 2UJ

5R

1 U

1U

23 1 U

1 u 1U

0.8 J

5R 1U

1U

1U

O.SJ

1 u 1 u 1U

1U

3

1U 1 U 5 U 5R

1U

1 U 1 U 4 1 U

1 U

1U

1 UJ

1U 1 U

1 U 1 u

RPD

NA

NA

NA 29

NA NA

NA

NA 14

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA 0

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA + NA +

NA NA

mmmmmmmmmmm EPA/TRC

SB3545

4UJ

4UJ

4UJ 4UJ

4UJ

R 4UJ

4UJ

11 J 4UJ 4UJ

4UJ 4UJ

20 UR

4UJ 4UJ

4UJ 4UJ

4UJ 8 J 4UJ

4UJ

6 J

4UJ 4UJ

20 UJ 20 UJ

4UJ

4UJ 76 J

4 J 4UJ

4UJ

17J 4UJ

4UJ 7 J

4UJ

NR

PRP

7 U 7 U

7 U 7 U 7 U

14 UJ

36 R

7 U

11 7 U 7 U

7 U 7 U J

36 R

7 U 7 U

7 U 7 U

7 U

10 7 U 7 U

6 J

7 U 7 U

36 U 36 R

7 U

7 U

97 7 U 7 U

7 U

13 7 U J

7 U

5 J 7 U J 7 U

RPD

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA 0

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA 22

NA

NA

0

NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA 24

NA + NA

NA

27 NA

NA

33

NA NA

U - Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J - Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R - Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD - Relative peroent difference; RPO is calculated only when analytas are detected in both samples. ' - Results outside the quantitative oomparabiiity goal for split samples - RPD > 50% • - Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC but not ijy the PRP NR • Data point was not reported. NA - Calculation of a quantKative comparatiility goal was not neccessary.

j Table A-2b

1 Analyte

Phenol !bs(2-Chloro9thyl)Ether

i 2-ChlorophBnol 11,3-Dichloroben28ne

11 ..i-Oichlorobenzene

1.2-DichlorobBn2en8 J2-Methylphenol j bB(2-ChlorDisopropyl)Ether

14-Methylphenol 1 N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine 1 Hexachloroetfiane 1 Nitrobenzene 1 IsoDtiorone

; 2-Nitroph9nol

|2.'i-Dimethylph9nol

j Benzoic Acid (1) i bJS(2-Chloro8thoxy)Methan8 2.^DichlQroph8nol

j 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene

Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline

Hexachlorobutadiene 4-Chloro-3-lvlBthylphenol 2-Methylnaphthal8ne

i Hexachlorocyclopentadiene j 2.4 6-Trichioroptienol

2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthalen8.

!2-Nitroanilin8 1 Dimethyl Phthalate

\Acsnaphthyiena

i2.5-Dinitrotoluene

13-Nitroaniline

j Acenaphthene j2.4-Dinitrophenol

j4-Nitro phenol 1 DitJenzofuran j2.4-Dinitrotoluene

Diethylphthalate 14-Chlorophenyl-phenylether Fiuorene

[ 4-Nitroaniiine

j4,S-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol

j N-Nitrosodiphenylamine i4-8romophenyl-phenylelher

Hexachlorobenzene

Pentachlorophenol

I Phenanthrene

Anthracene Carbazole

Di-n-Butylphthalate

Fluoranthene Pyrene

Butylbenzylphthalate 3.3'-Dichlorobenzidine

Benzo(a)Anthracene

Chrysene

bis(2-Ethylh8xyl)Phthalate

Di-n.Octyl Phthalate

B9nzo{b)Fluoranth8ne B8nzo{k)Fluoranth8ne Benzo(a)Pyrene

lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyr8ne

Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene

Benzo{g,h,i)Perylen8

SPUT SAMPLE COMPARISON . CORTESE LANDFILL SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS IN WATER (ugrtj

ISMMB EPA/TRC

10 U

10 U 10 u

2 J 15

4 J 10

10 u

u

10 u 10 UJ 10 u 10 u 10 u

8 J NR

10U 10 U

5 J

10

10 U

10 U 10U 4 J

10 U 10U

25 UJ 10 U 25 U 10 U

10 U

10 U 25 UJ

10U

25 U

25 UJ lOU

10 u

2 J 25 U 25 U

25 U

25 U

10U 10 UJ

10 U

25 U

10U

10U 10U

10U

10U

10 U 10 u

10 u

10 u

10U 4 U

10 U

10 u

10 U 10 U

10 u

10 u

10 u

M M M M m i i IPRP

10 u

10 u 10U 2 J

15

4 J 9 J

10 U 14

10 U 10U 10U 10 U

10 U 6 J

2 J

10 u

10 U 6 J

10 U

10 u 10 u 3 J 4 J

10U

10 U

25 U 10 U

25 U 10 U

10 u 10 u

25 U

10 U

25 U

25 U 10 U 10 U

3 J

10 U 10 U

25 U

25 U

10 U 10 U

10 U

25 U

10 U

10 U 10U

1 J

10 U

10 U 10 U

10 u

10 U

10 u 10 UJ

10 UJ

10U

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u

10U

I R P D

NA

NA NA

0

0

0 NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA NA NA

29 NA

NA

NA

18 NA

NA

NA f ^

0 NA

NA

NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

40 NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

f ^ NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA j

NA NA

[ M W i » ; H ; » ; EPA/TRC

IsGETg

lOU

10 u 10U

10 U

9 J

2 J 10 U

' t o u

10 u

10 u 10 u lOU 10 u 10 u

10 UJ NR

10U

10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u 10 u

10 u 10 u

25 U 10 U

25 U 10 U 10 u

10U 25 UJ

10U

25 U

25 UJ 10 U

10 U

10 U

10 u 10 u

25 U

25 U

10 U 10 U 10 U

25 U

10U

10U 10 U

10 U

10 U

10 U

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

10U

10U

m r n m r n s m PRP

10 u

10 u 10 U

2 J

10

2 J 10 U

1 10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u 10 u 10U 10 u

10 u

100 u 10 u

10U

u 10 u

10 u

t o u 10 u 10 u 10 u

t o u

25 U 10 u

25 U

10 U 10 U

10 u 25 U

10 u

25 U

25 U 10U

10 U

10 U 10 U 10 U

25 U

25 U

10 U 10 U 10 U

25 U

10 U

10U 10 U

10U

10 U

10 U

10 U 10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

t o u

10 u

Pa9«1c4 2

JRPD

NA

NA

NA

l>IA

11 0

NA

NA

NA

NA f>IA

NA fvIA

NA f ^

NA

NA

NA

NA f>IA

NA

NA NA NA

f>JA

NA f>IA

NA

NA f ^ NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA

t ^

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

r>IA

NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA

; i i w « G i

i EPA/TRC •;BGE80

i 10 U

i 10 U i 10 U

10 U

i *•' ! ' J 1 10 u

i \ 10 u

1 10 u i 10 u 1 10 u

10 u

10 u u

; NR

j 10 u 1 10 u

1J 10 u

10 u

10 UJ

1 10 u i 10 u

2SU

10 u

25U 1 10 u

25U

i 10 u 1 10 u

10 u 25 U

10 U

25 U

25 U 10 U

10 U

10U

10 U 10 U

R

25U

10 U 10 U 10 u

25U

10 U

10 U 10 UJ

10 U

10 U

10 u 10 UJ

10 u

10 u

10 u 10 UJ

10 UJ

10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u

I P R P

10 u

1 10 u j 10 u

1 1J

1 ° 6 J 10 u

10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u 10U 10 u 10 u

10U 100 u

10 u

10 u

2 J 10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u 25 U 10 u

25 U 10 u 10 u

10 u 25 U

10 u

25 U 25 U 10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u

25 U

25 U

10 u

10 u 10 UJ

25 U

10 U

10 U 10 u

10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u

10 u 10 UJ

10 UJ

10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u

10 u

I R P D

NA

NA NA NA

8 6 -1 4 3 '

NA NA

NA

NA NA f ^ NA NA

NA +

NA 1 ^

NA

6 7 '

NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

f ^ NA

NA

NA NA

NA 1 NA 1 NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

U - Anajyts was not d«t»ci»d at the conc«nration listod. J ' Quanbtabon m apprceonato du» to limiialicne idanliftad during Ih* quality contrd raviaw. R > V«)u* was f0i*ct»d dua to laboratory quality control profaiania. RPO - RaJaliva parccnt d^ffaranca; RPO is calculatad only Mhan analytaa ara datactad in both umptai * - Racults outsida ttia <ântitatrvo comparabiity goai for sff t samplas - RPO > 50% * • An^yta waa dalaclad by EPA/TRC but not by t ia PRP. NR - Data pdnl waa not raportad

4A a Calculation of a quanOtativa oomparabiiity goal was not naccaasory.

t -Baruoie add is rx>t a TCL compound but anaiyzad by PRP

300832

Table A-2b SPUT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS IN WATER (ug/L)

P a g e 2 a l 2

Analyte

Phenol bis(2-Chloroethyl)Eth8r 2.Chlorophenol 1,3-Dichlorobenzen8 1,4-Dichlorobenzen8 1,2-Oichlorobenzene 2-Methylphenol bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether 4-M8thyiphenol N-Nitroso-Oi-n-Propylamine Hexachloroetfâne Nitrobenzene Isophorone 2-Nilrophenol 2.4-Dimethylphenol Benzoic Acid (1) bis(2-Chloro6thoxy)Methane 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene Naphthalene 4.Chloroaniline Hexachlorobutadiene

14-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 12-M8thylnaphthal6ne ! Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4.5-Trichlorophenol 2-Chloronaphthai8ne 2-Nitroaniline Dimethyl Phthalate Acenaphthylene 2.6-Dinitrotoluene 3-Nitroaniline Acenaphthene

!2,4-Dinitrophenol j 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzoturan 2,4-Dinitrotoluen8 Diethylphthalate 4-Chiorophenyl-ph8nylether Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline

4,6-0initro-2-i\/lethyiphenol N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 4-Bromopnenyl-phenylether Hexachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Carbazole Di-n-Butylphthalate Fluoranthene Pyrene

Butylbenzylphthalate 3.3'-Dichlorobenzidine Benzo(a)Anthrac8ne Chrysene

b is(2- Ethylhoxyl) Phthalate DJ-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Benzo(k)Fluoranthene Benzo(a)Pyrene lndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene Dibenz(a,h)Anthrac8ne Benzo(g,h,i)Peryleno

s w t . a EPAH'RC BQEB2

10 U 10 U 10 U lOU 3 J

10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U lOU 10 UJ

NR 10 U 10 U 10 u 10 u lOU 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10U

25U 10 u

25U

10 U

10 U

10 U

25U 10 U

25 U

25 UJ

lOU

10 U

10U

lOU 10 U 25 U

25 U

10 U 10 U

10 U

2SU

10 U

10 U

10 U 2 J

10 U

10 U 10 U

10 U

10 U

lOU 10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u

10 u

PRP

10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 3 J

10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ

7J 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 25 U 10 UJ 25 U 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 25 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 25 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 25 UJ 25 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 25 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 UJ

RPD ®W»1t •EPA/TRC !BGE83

NA NA NA NA

( NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA f ^ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

27 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 75 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 UJ

NR 10 U 10 U 10 U l O U 10 U 10 UJ 10 u 10 u 10 UJ

10 u 25 U

10 U

25 U

10 U

10 U

10 U 25 UJ

10 U

25 U R

10 U

10 U 1 J

10 U 10 U

25 UJ 25 U

10 U 10 U

10 U

25 U

lOJ

10 U

10 UJ

10 J

10 J

10 J 10 U

10 U

10 U

10 U 10 UJ 10 UJ 10 u

10 u 10 u

10 u

10 u

10 u

PRP

2 J 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 UJ

10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u

7J

10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 25 U 10 u 25 UJ 10 u 10 u 10 u 25 UJ 10 u 25 U 25 U 10 u lOU lOU 10 u 10 u 25 U 25 U 10 U 10 U

l o u

2 J 10 U 10 U 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 UJ 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u lOU lOU 10 u 10 u 10 u 10 u

RPO

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA l>IA NA NA NA NA I4A I>1A NA NA NA NA NA fvlA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f<IA NA NA NA f M NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f M NA NA

U - Anilyto waft not dfttoctod at the ooncankalion fislad. J - QuanMaljon ts apprcKJmato dua to limitationft idantfiad Airing tha quality contrd rvtnaw. R > Vaiua was rqactad dua to laboratory quaity conrol problama RPD - Ralaliva parcant diffaranoa; FVO is calculatad only whan analytaa ara datactad in tMtfi samfjas. * - Raaulb outsida tha cfjantitabva cocnparabiily god for sf^lit samplas - RPD > 50V. * . Analyta waa dMacM by EPA/TRC but not by t>a PRP. NR - Data poalt was not raportad NA - Calculalion ol a qjantitativa oomparabiiity goai was not naccaesary.

300833

§ ^•. >

CO o o OD CO

Table A-2c

Analyte

alpha-BHC

beta-BHC delta-BHC Lindane Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan 1 Dieldrin 4,4'-DDE Endrin Endosulfan II 4,4'-DDD Endosulfan sulfate 4,4'-DDT

Methoxychlor Endrin ketone

Endrin aldehyde alpha-Chlordane gamma-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232 Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248

Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL PESTICIDE/PCBs IN WATER (ug/L)

WK^^miî^Mi EPAn-RC

BGE78

0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.5 U 0.1 U

0.1 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

5U 1 U 2U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U

U = Analyte was no J = Quantitation is i

PRP

NR

NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR


NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR

t detected at the co ipproximate due lo

RPD




ncentration 1 imitations id

Page 1 of 2

WMMS^mm^^m EPA/TRC

BGE79

0.05 U

0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

0.1 U

0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.5 U 0.1 U

0.1 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

5U 1 U 2U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U

sted. entified during the q

PRP

NR




ualily control review

RPD

NA




ililiiiiiH ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ EPA/TRC

BGEBO

0.05 U

0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U

0.1 U 0.1 U

: 0.1 U 0.5 U 0.1 U

0.1 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

5U 1 U 2U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U

PRP

NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR


RPD

NA




R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent ditlerence; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. * = Results outside the quantitative comparability goal (or split samples - RPD > 50% + = Analyte was detected by EP/VTRC but not by the PRP. NR = Data point was not reported. NA •< Calculation of a quanlilaliva compar^llity goal was not neccessary.

^ ?

Table A-2c SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON - CORTESE LANDFILL PESTICIDE/PCBs IN WATER (ug/L)

Page 2 of 2

Analyte

^ alpha-BHC beta-BHC delta-BHC

Lindane

Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide Endosulfan I Dieldrin 4,4'-DDE Endrin Endosulfan II 4,4'-DDD Endosulfan sulfate 4,4'-DDT Methoxychlor Endrin ketone Endrin aldehyde alpha-Chlordane gamma-Chlordane Toxaphene Aroclor-1016 Aroclor-1221 Aroclor-1232

Aroclor-1242 Aroclor-1248 Aroclor-1254 Aroclor-1260

SW-IZ EPA/TRC

BGE82

R 0.050 U 0.050 U

0.050 U

R 0.050 U 0.050 U 0.050 U

0.10 U

R 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.50 U 0.10 U 0.10 u

0.050 U 0.050 U

5.0 U 1.0 U 2.0 U 1.0 U

1.0 U 1.0 U

1.0 U 1.0 U

PRP

RPD

0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.5 UJ 0.1 U 0.1 U

0.05 U 0.05 U

5U 1 U 2 U 1 U 1 U 1 U

1 U 1 U


SW-I I EPA/TRC BGE83

0.050 U 0.050 U 0.050 U

0.050 U

R R

0.050 U R

0.10 U

R 0.10 U

R 0.10 U 0.10 U

0.012 J 0.011 J 0.10 U 0.10 U

0.0012 J 0.050 U

5.0 U 1.0 U 2.0 U 1.0 U

1.0 U 1.0 U

1.0 U 1.0 U

PRP

0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

R 0.05 U .0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U

. 0.5 UJ ;.0.1 U

0.1 U 0.05 U 0.05 U

5U 1 U 2 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U

RPD

NA NA NA,

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA'


NA NA

NA NA

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identitied during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD Is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. * 3 Results outside the quantitative comparability goal for split samples - RPD > 50% + = Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC but not by the PRP.^ NR = Data point was not reported. NA = Calculation ol a quantitative comparability goal was nS^^R^ssary.

o o CD C0

Table A-2d

Analyte


SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISON • CORTESE LANDFILL INORGANICS 1 IN WATER (ug/L)

CRDL

200 60 10

200 5 5

500 10 50 25

100 3

5000 15

0.2 40

5000 5

10 5000

10 50 20 10

iiiiiliiiiiiiii EPA/TRC MBHL83

2250 27 U

91.6 533

1 U 3 U

16100 5 U 6 U

6.8 42600

20.4 3490

12900 0.2 U 15 U

8750 J 3 U 7 U

9260 J 3 U

5.9 47.5

10 UJ

PRP

14700.00 J 36.00 U 90.60 J

662.00 1.00 U 5.00 U

15400.00 15.70 18,60 27.00

61100.00 38.40

5700.00 10700.00 R

0.20 U 28.10

9320.00 3.00 UJ 7.00 UJ

7500.00 40.00 UJ 8.00

171.00 J 10.00 U

RPD

147* NA

1 22

NA NA

4 NA NA

120 36 61 * 48

NA NA NA

6 NA NA

21 NA

30 NA NA

iiiiiiiiiii EPA/TRC MBHL82

250 27 U

52,1 312

1 U 3 U

8880 5 U 6U 6U

14500 2.6

2220 5860

0,2 U 15 U

5110J 3U 7U

5560 J 3U 5 U

10.6 ,, 10 UJ

:!:!:::^!^!:^^;;!:;^!:!^;:i:i:fe^

PRP

215.00 J 36.00 U 36.60 J

326.00 1.00 U 5.00 U

8860.00 8.00 U 8.00 U 4.00 U

11000.00 , 2.90 J

2090.00 5430.00 R

0.20 U 17.00 U

5040.00 3.00 UJ 7.00 UJ

4850.00 4.00 UJ 6.00 U

68.60 J 10.00 U

Page 1 of 2

RPD

15 NA

35* 4

NA NA

0 NA NA NA

27 11 6

NA NA NA

1 NA NA

14 NA NA

146* NA

iiiliiiiii EPA/TRC MBHL78

200 U 60 U 55

835 5 U 5 U

39000 38 50 U 25 U

53500 3

8000 14000

0.2 U 40 U

15000 5 U

10U 10000

10U SOU 20 U

11

Hiiiiiiiii PRP

163.00 36.00 U 57.80

862.00 1.00 U 5.00 U

41100.00 8.00 U 8.00 U 4.00 U

55400.00 2.00 U

8150.00 14000.00

0.20 U 17.00 U

15300.00 3.00 UJ 7.00 U

10100.00 4.00 UJ 6.00 U 4.10

10.00 U

RPD

NA NA

5 3

NA NA

5 NA + NA NA

3 NA

2 0 +

NA NA

2 NA NA

1 NA NA NA NA -1-

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. ' = Results outside the quantitative comparability goal tor split samples - either the RPD > 50% or one or both split samples had a concentration < SxCRDL and an absolute difference > CRDL + = Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC and not by the PRP NR = Data point was not reported NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability goal was not neccessary.

Table A-2d SPLIT SAMPLE COMPARISd^*(iORTEaEst>5^li5|^^ INORGANICS IN WATER (ifgiî^J

!îGif^2^

Analyte


CRDL

200 60 10

200 5 5

500 10

50 25

100 3

5000

15 0.2 40

5000 5

10 5000

10 50 20 10

MW-2B EPA/TRC MBHL79

200 U 60 U 10U

200 U 5 U 5 U

12000

13 50 U 25 U

153 3 U

5000 U 1480

0.2 U 40 U

5000 U 5 U

10U 32000

10U 50 U 20 U 10U

PRP

93.10 36.00 U

3.00 U i 134.00

1.00 U 5.00 U

13000.00 8.00 U 8.00 U 4.00 U

108.00 2.00 J

2970.00 1500.00

0.20 U 17.00 U

3870.00 3.00 UJ' 7.00 U

32200.00 4.00 UJ 6.00 U 4.00 U

10.00 U

mm- .

NA '

^ ^ NA--

NA NA

8 NA -I-NA NA

34 NA NA ; 1 NA NA;

N A

m NA

1 NA NA NA NA

^0 jm^ . fn^ m&^

363

•' . 3 ^ ^ '••

230^'-" : 5 J U -

10 u 50 U 25 U

SQiOfim >

40 M i 500(iU :

5,0 U 10 U

fsoob' 10.0 u

50 U 20 U 10 U

730:00 ; 36.o©iyiU • 32Mf'^J

: 2i5*5Miw "

1.00;U.y

S.OQy;;^

17000.00

8.0a4J,w

8:^0i^J.i-

4;p)paj

48iO;iO ; i-40--: '

; 3300.00 13200.00 •

0.20 U 17.00 U

2640.00 3.00 UJ 7.00 U

121'00.00 4.00 UJ 6.00 U

25.10 10.00 U

: .65^^

:• iP-':

I • 7

6

NA N A

NA,

NA NA

10

NAv

M r

NA

7 NA NA NA NA

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD Is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. * = Results outside tha quantitative comparability goal for split samples -- either the RPD > 50% or one or both split samples had a concentration < SxCRDL and an absolute difference > CRDL + = Analyte was detected by EPA/TRC and not b^ i ie PRP NR = Data point was not reported NA = Calculation of a quantitative comparability

b ^ i e

lâs not neccessary.

Documents

Report: Comparative Review of Split Sample Data, Remedial Investigation… · · 2016-06-13REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION CORTESE LANDFILL Work ... Deliverable - Comparative Review of Split