Report of HLRF KOM

S. Fukuda

Project Management Structure

Area: Main Linac Technology (to be completed) Regional/Intsitutional Effort: - Director-US: Mike Harrison - Director-EU: B. Foster - Director-AS: M. Nozaki

Technical Effort (ML (SCRF) Technology): - Project Manager: A. Yamamoto - Associate Managers: T. Shidara, J. Kerby, * Group leader, ** Co-leader

Regions Institute Institute Leaders

Cavity(Process) L. Lilje*

Cavity(Prod./Int.)H. Hayano*

Cryomodule

N. Ohuchi*-H. Carter**

Cryogenics

T. Peterson

HLRF

S. Fukuda*

ML Integr.

C. Adolphsen

US CornellFermilabSLACANLJ-lab

H.PadamseeR. KephartT.Raubenhaimer

H.Padamsee

C.AdolphsenH.Carter T.Peterson O. Nezhevenko

R. Larsen/ C.A. C. Adolphsen

EU DESYCERNSaclayOrsayINFNSpain

R.BrinkmanJ. DelahayeO. NapolyA.VariolaC. Pagani

L.Lilje

C. Pagani

Parma

Franco Pal.

TavianS. Choroba

AS KEK

Korea Inst.

IHEP

India Inst.

K.Yokoya Noguchi, Saito

Hayano Tsuchiya/

Ohuchi

Hosoyama/Nakai

Fukuda

Technical Responsibilities :(from RDR Chapter 7)

• Green indicates a commitment:– institute will deliver

• MoUs facilitate connection:– Project Management (authority and responsibility) and institutions

(funding and resources).

• The ‘C’ coordinating role in a WP – Each WP has one coordinator.

WP 1.1 WP 1.2 WP 1.3 WP 1… WP 2.1 WP 2.2 WP 2.3 WP 2… WP 3.1 WP 3.2 WP 3.3 WP 3…Institute A CInstitute B C CInstitute C C CInstitute D C CInstitute E C C… CInstitute T CInstitute UInstitute V C

Level-3 System Manager 2 Level-3 System Manager 3

Project Managers

Agency I

Agency II

Agency III

Level-3 System Manager 1MoUs Resp

on

sibility &

Au

tho

rity

Funding & Resources

Technical responsibility

High Level RF Groups Organization

for EDR-tasksModulator Klystron PDS Control ,,,

US CornellFermilab

SLAC

ANLJ-lab

C. Jensen

R. Larsen

C. Burkhart

C. Adolphsen

E. Jongewaard

C. Nantista

O. Nezhevenko

B. Chase

R. Cassel

EU DESYCEA-Saclay -OlsayINFNSpainCERN

V. Vogel S. Choroba V. Katalev

AS KEK

Korea Inst.

IHEP

India Inst.

M. Akemoto

T. Shidara

S. Fukuda

M. Yoshida

H.S. Kim

S. Fukuda/S. Kazakov

HLRF– EDR Tasks and Discussions in KOM

• Base-line Design and interface parameters to be verified, – Functional design parameters and interface to be unified,

– What have to be achieved and what have to be maintained?,

– What can be plug-compatibly improved?,

– How the tasks can be shared among sub-groups?,

• Critical Goal: – Technology to achieve E-op = 31.5 MV/m, reliably

• Otherwise, need to reduce the gradient or adjust the machine design

• Need a vital program of both R&D and demonstrations

• Important Work at HLRF tasks– System optimization for the best “value engineering”

– R&D for Marx Generator, ACD-PDS, SBK,

Summary for Charges• Basic design parameters and Interfaces to be

verified, • EDR design work and R&D (goal)

– Basic R&D to be completed – Learning mass production

• Discussions towards – “unified design/specification” and/or “”plug-

compatible design/specification

• Task sharing and schedule– Work-package definition and assignment– Strategy for open discussions and information,

Overview talk• Choroba (DESY)• Recent status of DESY was reported MBK Klystron, H-MBK delivery, modulator from additional ven

dor, HV cable test with bouncer mod. At higher potential, New PDS with symmetrical shunt tee,

• Fukuda (KEK)• Recent status of STF 0.5-1.0 in KEK was reported.• STF 0.5 and 1.0 plan, 3 BCD modulators test• Nezhevenko (FNAL) • FNAL modulator Status was reported

• Addolphsen (SLAC)• US Activity for ILC-ML was reported. Imortant ke tech. were covere

d by individual talk.

•

Technical discussion• Jongewaard /SBK• Yoshida/Super MBK

• Katalev/DESY PDS• Nantista/SLAC PDS

• Burkhart/Marx Modulator in SLAC• Akemoto/Bouncer Modulator in KEK

• Cassel/HA Charging System

WP for HLRF

Technical highlight

Super-MBK KEK

Heat problem

• Emil Hueden showed the heat table with marked uncompleted (should be revised) parts

• .-- responsible person• Klystron-Fukuda

• PDS-C. Nantista

• Modulator- C. Jensen

• Charger – R. Cassel

• We’re ask to evaluate LCW water system delta T.• In order to evaluate this (and confirm cost savings), we need

more info on the water cooled component and we ask your help in updating or getting more information for each of those items.

Getting the table filled will be helpful, but as minimum, the following for each water cooled components are needed

• combination of either one of the following (Load/Flow, or Load/Delta T or Flow/Delta T)

• Maximum allowable temperature• Pressure drop (corresponding to a given flow)

• If possible, information to be given is agreed upon by the group

• We appreciate Shigeki-san’s help in getting the information started

Snapshot

Nov 27 2006

Shin’s Talk

Review existing EDR Engineering plans (specs, costing, vendors)

• STF Plan Engineering, Industrialization (Fukuda)

STF2&STF3, WP’s for them, Industrialization for Asian region

• US ART Work Package (Adolphsen)

US WP List, Related person list

• EDR Management Work Packages (Non R&D) (Larsen)

Concerning with this talk, there discussed the relation between the EDR and R&D.

• Two Task Categories for each WP1. EDR WP - Management:

• Subsystem Engineering leaders perform following tasks:1. R&D & Overall Project Plans2. Cost Analysis & Schedules3. Manufacturing & Installation Models4. Develop EDR Report5. Develop Bid Packages for all Regions (w/R&D)6. Build-to-print for first ACD’s7. Recommend down-selection (or not)

2. R&D WP – ACD Prototypes: • Organize collaboration, design, build, test prototypes• Documentation for Build-to-Print, Specifications• Develop Vendors via prototype procurement• Assist Bid Package development. Industry liaison

Definitions: Management & R&D WP’s

EDR Challenge

• EDR definition implies that interim 08-10 period must be sufficiently staffed, funded to achieve “EDR Readiness” by 2010.

• Requires leadership, strong contributions and collaboration from all Regions

• Requires active involvement of industrial partners• Building inter-regional and lab-industry

collaboration through Work Packages critical to meeting EDR goals.

V. EDR Work Packages

R&D WP Project

Management Team

Region 1Region 2

Sub Project 1Region 1

Sub Project 2Region 2

Example Collaboration ConceptEDR WP

Joint Management Team

Region 1Region 2

Region 1 EDR WP Support

Region 2 EDR WP Support

Management Model•Joint teams may require

co-location for some overlap period•Single lead managers optional also•Sub-projects in differentregions include low level or high-level projects(e.g. Design a controller; Build a klystron or modu-lator with Regional industryManagement

WP’s

R&D WP’s

R&D WP Summary Remarks

• Technical Challenges– ACD R&D vital to cost reduction, performance

improvements– Most modern technology available needed for

ILC in all areas for HA designs

• Collaboration Challenges– Forming effective inter-Regional R&D project

engineering teams essential– Transition from prototypes to industry essential

Technical efforts to EDR

• Complete the critical R&D – as identified by the (R & D Board and) , Prototype, DFM, Preproduction, and

..

• Establish the base-line design, – Verify the initial EDR base-line design parameters, – Technologies to be chosen and to be demonstrated through pre-mass-

production

– Learn industrialization• Obtain the maximum benefit from the realized project

• Proceed alternate design and development – As technology back-up to achieve the ILC design goal,

• with “Plug-compatible” concept, and • for maximizing performance/cost (value-engineering)