Page 1 of 14

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Spokane Public Facilities District

Sportsplex Project

May 25, 2018

This Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) from the Spokane Public Facilities District (the “District”) invites thesubmittal of a Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) from firms interested in providing Design-Build services for theSportsplex project described below. By submitting a SOQ, the Design-Builder represents that it has carefully readthe terms and conditions of this RFQ and all attachments and addenda and agrees to be bound by them.

Design-Builders shall submit the SOQ to Kevin Twohig at the Spokane Public Facilities District electronically, nolater than 10:00 AM on June 8, 2018.

SECTION I – SPOKANE PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT

A. General

The District was created in 1989 by the Washington State Legislature pursuant to RCW 36.100. Itis a municipal corporation with boundaries coextensive with the boundaries of Spokane County.The District operates the Spokane Convention Center, the INB Performing Arts Center, and theSpokane Veterans Memorial Arena.

The current name of the facility “Sportsplex” is a placeholder and is not intended to be thepermanent name of the facility. The intent is to identify a commercial sponsor for the namingrights.

B. Background, Parties and Process

On March 25, 2015, the Spokane Public Facilities District (SPFD or District) and the City of SpokanePark Department signed a Letter of Understanding to develop, maintain and operate theSportsplex. Through the Letter of Understanding, the City of Spokane will transfer property to theDistrict and contribute to the project funding as set forth in an Interlocal Agreement.

Sportsplex construction will be partially financed through Spokane County. The Spokane PublicFacilities District has entered into a Joint Resolution with Spokane County that authorizes theCounty to sell $25M in bonds for the project. In addition, the District will contribute $11M fromreserve funds and the city will contribute $5M. The State has been asked for a capital grant tofund the remaining $1M of the project funds.

Additionally the Spokane Sports Commission, a non-profit entity, is a key supporter of this projectas its mission is to promote sports tourism thru participatory sporting events such as basketball,volleyball, indoor track, and other court sports in Spokane County. The Sports Commission hasand will continue to play an important role in the promoting, funding and marketing of theSportsplex.

Page 2 of 14

This procurement is being conducted pursuant to RCW 39.10.330 which requires approval fromthe Washington State Capital Projects Advisory Review Board Project Review Committee.Approval will be sought on May 24, 2018.

SECTION II – OVERVIEW OF PROJECT

A. General

The District has completed a thorough study of the Sportsplex venue type conducted by SportsFacility Advisory (SFA) out of Clearwater Florida. The SFA report is the basis for the SpokaneSportsplex and provides a significant level of detail regarding the space allocations, costs andstaffing based on SFA’s understanding of the venue type and the market. The full SFA report isavailable at: http://www.spokanesportsplex.org/index.html#feasibility

The Sportsplex will provide Spokane with a venue to host local, regional and national athletictourism and recreational events and provide economic stimulus to Spokane and the surroundingregion. The SFA study suggests a total complex acreage of 5.3 acres, 185,000 sf of constructedspace and a footprint of 160,000 sf.

The proposed site is located immediately north of Riverfront Park and east of the SpokaneVeterans Memorial Arena. The site includes a portion of Cataldo Street between Howard Streetand Washington Street, which will require a public vacation process. Additionally,reconfiguration of Dean Street may be necessary. Approximately 90% of the proposed site isowned by the City of Spokane and the Parks Dept. The remaining 10% is owned by privateparties. Given the public and private ownership of land and the possible reconfiguration(vacation) of public streets, the project site available for development will be confirmed duringthe validation process.

Project Objectives:

Establish a collaborative relationship that fosters teamwork and open communicationsbetween the District and the Design-Build Team resulting in quality design and constructionon time and within the District’s budget.

Design and construct a project that will be a magnet for sports tourism and recreationalactivities, cost effective, complement existing District facilities and enhance the connectionto Riverfront Park

Maintain a safe, injury free work site.

Schedule, coordinate and conduct construction activities in a busy urban environmentwithout disrupting the surrounding neighborhood or businesses.

Include efficient operations taking advantage of the latest time-saving equipment andprocedures to allow for rapid conversions.

Plan for cost effective operations that utilize existing Spokane Public Facilities District andSpokane Sports Commission staff as much as possible.

Page 3 of 14

B. Scope of Work

The Sportsplex will include the following features: a 200 meter indoor hydraulic banked track,basketball courts, volleyball courts and spectator seating. A regulation size hockey rink andspectator seating may be included based on decisions to be made during the Validation Period.Support spaces will include: lobbies, offices, a food, beverage and dining area, locker rooms,restrooms, and large storage areas. The intent is for a flexible design that can support a widevariety of programs including indoor track, court sports, boxing, tennis, gymnastics, badminton,cheer, roller derby, wresting, martial arts and more. If the ice house is included hockey andfigure skating could be accommodated but there is no planned program for recreational skating.The anticipated tasks for the DB team include but are not limited to the following:

Evaluation of the SFA study provided by the District.

Visit one or more Sportsplex type facilities during the validation phase to explore design andoperational solutions.

Public utility studies, surveys, traffic studies, street vacation and coordination with AHJs.

Geotechnical testing and analysis for inclusion in design and engineering of project.

Validation of Project including site conditions and the District’s budget

Survey of existing site conditions and environmental analysis.

Siting and design of the Project.

Site remediation as required by design.

All utility requirements including relocation of existing utilities as required by the City ofSpokane.

Coordination and installation of CFCI and OFCI provided equipment

Cost estimating and reporting

Value Engineering

Lifecycle cost analysis

Design and construction scheduling

Permitting

Construction

Phasing and scheduling construction to meet the schedule without interruption of servicesto neighboring businesses or the District’s customers.

Closeout (punchlist documentation and resolution, O&M manuals, systems and equipmenttraining, as-built documentation, final inspection and acceptance.)

Project commissioning

C. Estimated Target Budget

The estimated target budget for design and construction including remediation services is$35,000,000.

Page 4 of 14

D. Project Solicitation Schedule

The following is an estimated solicitation schedule. The District reserves the right to modify theschedule.

PRC Presentation 24-May-18

DB RFQ Advertisement 25-May-18

RFQ Issued 25-May-18

Statement of Qualifications Due 8-Jun-18

Short-List Announced 13-Jun-18

RFP Issued 18-Jun-18

Proprietary Meeting (1.5 hr) 28-Jun-18

Last Day to Request Contract Change 12-Jul-18

Proposals Due 19-Jul-18

Selection of Design-Builder/SPFD Board approval 8-Aug-18

Anticipate NTP 10-Aug-18

Validation Phase (120 calendar days)8/10/2018 -12/10/2018

Execute GMP Amendment 18-Dec-18

Substantial Completion 14-Sep-20

Close Out complete 15-Dec-20

E. Definitions

Design-Builder: The entity under contract with the District.

Design-Build Team: All persons and entities listed by the Design-Builder that will provideservices or construction on the project.

Design-Build Project: A project in which the owner executes a single contract with oneentity (design-builder) providing architectural/engineering and construction services.

Key Team Member: Individuals who are assigned to the Project with a significant role inthe design, construction or management of the Project.

Projects of Similar Scope and Complexity: Completed projects within the last seven (7)years and that have many or all of the following characteristics:

Projects of a similar size and budget that include design and construction ofsports or tourism facilities

Projects that utilize an integrated delivery method that require strong coordinationand integration between the Owner and the design and construction team;

Projects where the Design-Builder was selected prior to the establishment of thefinal price and schedule and where the Design-Builder collaborated with theowner to develop the final price and schedule; and

Page 5 of 14

Projects that require the Design-Builder to perform construction in a busydowntown area and schedule work to avoid disruption of local businesses.

SECTION III – SOLICITATION PROCESS

A. General Information

1. Compliance with Legal Requirements

This solicitation will be in accordance with RCW 39.10.330 and all applicable federal,state, and local laws, and District policies and procedures.

2. Communications with the District

Communication with the District regarding this project shall be via email only anddirected to Kevin Twohig. Do not communicate about this project with any other Districtemployees or consultants regarding the solicitation. Communication with other Districtemployees or consultants regarding the project may cause the firm involved to bedisqualified from submitting under this solicitation.

3. Expenses of Design-Builder and Payment of Honorarium

The District accepts no liability for the costs and expenses incurred by firms in respondingto this solicitation. Each Design-Builder that enters into the solicitation process shallprepare the required materials, the SOQ and the Proposal at its own expense and withthe express understanding that it cannot make any claims whatsoever forreimbursement from the District for the costs and expenses associated with the process.In accordance with RCW Ch. 39.10.330, the District will pay an honorarium in the amountof twenty-five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) to the short-listed Finalists submittingresponsive Proposals to the RFP that remain in competition until the point of Contractaward, but who are not awarded the Design-Build Contract.

4. Public Disclosure

All documentation provided to the District may be considered public documents underWashington public records act (RCW Chapter 42.56) and may be subject to disclosure.Design-Builders recognize and agree that the District will not be responsible or liable inany way for any losses that the Design-Builder may suffer from the disclosure ofinformation or materials to third parties.

Any material requested to be treated as confidential, proprietary information or tradesecrets must be clearly identified and readily separable from the balance of the proposal.Such designations will not necessarily be conclusive, and Design-Builders may berequired to justify why such material should not, upon written request, be disclosed bythe District under the applicable public records act. See RCW 39.10.470. The District willendeavor to provide at least two (2) business days’ notice of a public records request formaterial submitted pursuant to this solicitation. Design-Builders must respond to thenotice in writing with any objection to the production of the documents within two (2)business days of receipt of the notice. All costs incurred by Design-Builders associatedwith any public records request are the responsibility of the Design-Builders.

Page 6 of 14

Proposals submitted by Design-Build finalists are exempt from disclosure until notice ofselection is delivered to the highest scoring finalist or the selection process is terminated.

5. Protest Procedures

The protest procedures are set forth as Attachment A to this RFQ.

B. District Rights and Solicitation Conditions

The District reserves without limitation, and may exercise at its sole discretion, thefollowing rights and conditions with regard to this solicitation process:

1. To cancel the solicitation process and reject any and all proposals;

2. To waive any immaterial informality or irregularity;

3. To revise the solicitation documents and schedule via an addendum;

4. To reject any Design-Builder that submits an incomplete or inadequate response or is notresponsive to the requirements of this RFQ;

5. To provide clarifications or conduct discussions, at any time, with one or more Design-Builders;

6. To contact references that are not listed in the Design-Builder’s SOQs and investigatestatements on the SOQs and/or qualification of the Design-Builder and any firms orindividuals identified in the SOQ;

7. To consider alternative technical concepts and/or approaches identified by Design-Builders;and

8. To take any action affecting the RFQ process, the RFP process, or the Project that isdetermined to be in the District’s best interests.

C. Outline of the Solicitation Process

1. Request for Qualifications (RFQ).

a. This RFQ invites firms to submit SOQs describing in detail their technical,management, and financial qualifications to design, permit, construct, closeout,and commission the Project. The issuance of the RFQ is the first phase of thesolicitation process. In an attempt to minimize the required effort of the Firm,RFQ submittals shall be on one (1) single sided A3 (11 x 17) page.

b. Design-Builders will submit their SOQ and other deliverables required pursuantto this solicitation at the time and in the manner set forth in this RFQ and anyaddenda. The District will not consider SOQ’s or other deliverables that aresubmitted after the time set forth in the RFQ. Design-Builders are solelyresponsible for making sure that the District receives the SOQ in a timely fashion.

c. The District will evaluate the information submitted by each Design-Builder todetermine whether the Design-Builder meets the mandatory minimumrequirements pursuant to the scoring system described below. Any Design-

Page 7 of 14

Builder who fails to meet the mandatory minimum requirements set forth in thisSOQ will not be considered further by the District in this solicitation.

d. All SOQ will be evaluated in accordance solely with the criteria established in theRFQ and any addenda issued thereto.

e. Not more than three (3) responsive and responsible firms will be selected asFinalists. Only those firms that have been short-listed will be invited to submit aProposal in response to the RFP.

f. The SOQ scores will be carried forward and included in the final evaluation andselection.

g. Design-Builder and individual Key Team Members included by the Design-Builder inthe SOQ (collectively “Team Members”), as identified in Section II.E will be used as abasis for selection. Substitution of Team Members at any time during the solicitationprocess and in the performance of the work will not be allowed without writtenauthorization from the District, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Even withwritten authorization from the District, a change to any submitted Team Memberwill result in re-evaluation and may result in a change to the evaluation and rankingof the Design-Builder.

2. Request for Proposal (RFP), Proprietary Meeting & Selection Process

a. The District will issue the RFP to the shortlisted Finalists. The RFP will furtherexplain the evaluation criteria, Proprietary Interactive Meetings, and otherelements of the RFP process.

b. Up to five (5) days prior to the submission date for Proposals, written questions willbe accepted and answered as defined in the RFP.

c. The District will conduct a Proprietary Meeting with each Finalist as described inthe RFP. The format of the Proprietary Meeting will be designed to allow theFinalists to ask the District questions regarding the Project and the District’s goalsand concerns. The Firm will set the agenda for the Proprietary meeting. TheProprietary meeting will also provide an opportunity for direct interactionbetween the Finalist and the RFP Evaluation Committee.

d. A Finalist may submit suggested proposed changes to the contract provisions nolater than the date set forth in the Schedule. The District, in its sole discretion,may revise the RFP, the contract provisions and/or program documents and issuean addendum to all Finalists.

e. Finalists will submit a Management Proposal and Price Proposal in accordancewith the solicitation schedule. The Management Proposal should notunnecessarily repeat information presented in the SOQ.

f. The Price Proposal will be submitted in a separate distinctly marked and sealedenvelope from the Management Proposal.

g. The District will establish an RFP Evaluation Committee to review and evaluatethe technical proposal. The RFP Evaluation Committee may be the same as the

Page 8 of 14

RFQ Evaluation Committee. The RFP Evaluation Committee will evaluate theManagement Proposals in accordance with the published evaluation criteria.

h. At its sole discretion, the District may ask written questions of Design-Builders,seek written clarifications, and conduct discussions on Proposals.

i. The District will provide a written notification to all Finalists of the selectiondecision and make a selection summary of the final proposals available to allDesign-Builders at the conclusion of the solicitation.

j. The District will initiate negotiations with the Finalist submitting the highestscored proposal. If the District is unable to execute a contract with the Finalistsubmitting the highest scored Proposal, negotiations with that Finalist may besuspended or terminated. The District may proceed to negotiate with the nexthighest scored firm, and will continue in accordance with this procedure until acontract agreement is reached or the selection process is terminated.

3. Price Proposal Contents

a. Design-Builder’s Proposed Fixed Fee

The Price Proposal will include the Design-Builder’s Proposed Fixed Fee, the elementsof which will be defined in the Standard Form of Progressive Design-BuildAgreement between Owner and Design-Builder. It is anticipated that the FixedFee will include the Design-Builder’s profit, home office overhead, and bondingand insurance costs.

b. Design-Builder’s Proposed Fixed General Conditions Costs:

The Price Proposal will include the Design-Builder’s Proposed Fixed GeneralConditions Costs. It is anticipated that the Fixed General Conditions costs will includejob site overhead, costs of temporary tools, wages and salaries of onsite supervisorypersonnel, the costs for permits, royalties, licenses, and accounting and dataprocessing costs related to the Work.

c. Guarantee for Owner’s Minimum Program Requirements

The RFP will outline the Owner’s Minimum Program Requirements. Submission of aPrice Proposal for this Project will constitute a guarantee from each Finalist that thefixed GMP set forth in the RFP is sufficient to include the Minimum ProjectRequirements within the Scope of Work. The District will also identify OptionalProgram Enhancements, and the selected Design-Builder will work cooperativelywith the District to determine the Final Scope of Work, including but not limited to allefficiencies identified by the Design-Build Team as well as Optional ProgramEnhancements selected collaboratively by the parties.

d. Design Builder’s Proposed cost for all work during the Validation Period (not scored).

The Validation Period cost will include the maximum cost that will be billed to theDistrict during the 120-day period after the Notice to Proceed and before the GMPAmendment is finalized. The Validation Period cost will not be part of the PriceProposal calculation but will be evaluated based on how accurately it reflects workto be performed during the validation period.

Page 9 of 14

4. Evaluation and Ranking of Design-Builders

In the evaluation and ranking of Design-Builders, the District will consider theinformation submitted in the SOQ, Proprietary Interactive Meetings, the ManagementProposal and the Price Proposal with respect to the evaluation criteria set forth in theRFQ and RFP.

The evaluation will result in a comparative ranking of Design-Builders based on thenumber of points awarded in each category. The District will initiate contractnegotiations with the highest scoring finalist with all Finalists notified of the District'sselection decision.

RFQ Total Points: 100

Team Organization and location 40 points

Demonstrated History ofSuccessful Projects of SimilarScope and Complexity

60 points

Proprietary InteractiveMeetings

Total Points: 50

Management Proposal Total Points: 100

Overall Management Approach 70 points

Design Development 10 points

Project Controls, Cost Tracking,and GMP Development 10 points

Project Sequencing andScheduling 10 points

Price Components Total Points: 25

Maximum Points 275 points

D. Contract Format

The District will use a modified DBIA Agreement that is anticipated to follow the formatbelow.

1. The Design-Builder will be compensated based on the Cost of the Work, a Fixed Fee andFixed General Conditions Costs, up to a fixed Guaranteed Maximum Price (“GMP”) thatwill not exceed $35,000,000.

2. The Design-Build Agreement will have several phases. A general description of those phases isbelow:

Validation Period: The Validation Period occurs after Notice to Proceed is executed andlasts 120 days. During the Validation Period, the Design-Builder will, among other duties,perform the following tasks:

Complete the validation of all information provided by the District as well as thesite investigation;

Work with the District to collaboratively establish the Basis of Design Documents.

At the conclusion of this period, the Design-Builder will provide a Proposal to theDistrict including a proposed Final Basis of Design Documents, a complete project

Page 10 of 14

budget, and a Project Schedule. The parties will enter into an amendment to theDesign-Build Agreement to incorporate the GMP Proposal, provided the partiesarrive at agreement on the relevant terms to the GMP Proposal. The Ownerreserves the right to request that the Design-Builder submit a proposal for a LumpSum Contract once the Final Basis of Design Documents has been agreed upon.

GMP Execution Period: During the GMP Execution Period, the Design-Builder completesthe permitting, design and construction pursuant to the Final Basis of DesignDocuments, the GMP and/or Lump Sum (if agreed to by the parties), and the ProjectSchedule.

SECTION IV – SOQ DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS

A. Submittals

Design-Builders will submit SOQs pursuant to the following instructions:

1. SOQ must arrive electronically to Kevin Twohig by 10:00 AM on June 8, 2018. File size mustbe less than 10Mb to clear email server limitations.

2. Once transmitted, a follow-up call must be made to make sure the information has beenreceived.

3. SOQ must be transmitted to the following email address:

Sportsplex

Statement of Qualifications

Attention: Mr. Kevin Twohig, CVE

ktwohig@spokanepfd.org

(509) 279-7020

Spokane Public Facilities District

720 West Mallon Avenue

Spokane, WA 99201

B. SOQ Format Requirements

The SOQs shall comply with the following format requirements:

1. The SOQ shall be organized in accordance with the Evaluation Criteria in Section V.

2. The SOQ, when printed, shall be limited to a maximum of one (1) single sided A3 (11 x 17)page plus up to eight (8) single sided 8.5 x 11 pages for resumes of Key Team Members.

a. The only documentation that is not included in the page count is the following:

i. Letter of interest.

ii. Statement of Design-Builder’s Ability to Provide Performance andPayment Bond;

Page 11 of 14

iii. Statement of Design-Builder’s Ability to Meet the District’s InsuranceRequirements;

b. Corporate Structure Questionnaire.

c. SOQs that exceed the page limit may be rejected. The District, at its solediscretion, reserves the right to remove pages from the sections of any non-conforming SOQ submittals to bring each non-conforming SOQ submittal withinthe page count requirement.

d. A “page” shall be defined as one single-sided piece of paper that has words,charts, tables, pictures, or graphics.

e. The font should be no smaller than 10 point and readable.

C. SOQ Organization

SOQs shall consist of the following parts:

1. Letter of Interest

2. Minimum Qualifications

a. Statement of Design-Builder’s Ability to Provide Performance and Payment Bond.(See Attachment B)

b. Statement of Design-Builder’s Ability to Meet the District’s InsuranceRequirements. (See Attachment C)

3. Technical & Management Qualifications

a. Team Organization

b. Demonstrated History of Successful Projects of Similar Scope and Complexity

c. Project Management Experience

4. Resumes

5. Corporate Structure Questionnaire

a. Submit a completed Corporate Structure Questionnaire for Design-Builder (SeeAttachment D)

SECTION V – SOQ EVALUATION CRITERIA AND SUBMITTAL INFORMATION

A. Letter of Interest (No points)

The SOQ must include a cover letter containing the name, address, telephone number, faxnumber, and e-mail address of the Design-Builder and the principal contact person. The Letterof Interest shall also include the following: (1) name, address, telephone number, fax number,and e-mail address for all major consultants, sub-consultants and/or subcontractors for theProject and (2) the type of firm or organization (corporation, partnership, joint venture, etc.) thatwill serve as the prime contracting party. The letter of interest may be a maximum of one (1)page.

Page 12 of 14

B. Minimum Qualifications

1. Statement of Design-Builder’s Ability to Provide Performance and Payment Bond(Pass/Fail)

As a mandatory minimum requirement the Design-Builder must have a bonding capacity ofnot less than thirty five million dollars ($35,000,000.) and the ability to obtain a performanceand payment bond. Design-Builder shall provide a letter from Design-Builder’s suretycompany or underwriter confirming bonding capacity. Any Design-Builder who fails to meetthis mandatory minimum requirement will not be considered further by the District in thissolicitation process. The surety shall be a company qualified and registered to conductbusiness in the state of Washington.

2. Statement of Design-Builder’s Ability to Meet the District’s Insurance Requirements(Pass/Fail)

As a mandatory minimum requirement the Design-Builder must establish that it has the abilityto meet the minimum insurance requirements as set forth in the attached draft InsuranceRequirements (Attachment C). Design-Builder shall provide a letter from Design-Builder’sinsurance broker (or agent) confirming its commitment to insure Design-Builder if selected toperform the Project. Any Design-Builder who fails to meet this mandatory minimumrequirement will not be considered further by the District in this solicitation. The insurer shallbe a company qualified and registered to conduct business in the state of Washington.

C. Technical and Management Qualifications

The SOQ shall demonstrate the Design-Build Team’s ability to undertake the Project byproviding the technical and management qualifications of the Design-Builder and its designconsultants and individual Key Team Members of the contractor. The Design-Builder isresponsible for ensuring that contact information contained in their referenced project profilesis correct. The inability to contact a reference may have a detrimental impact on the evaluatingqualifications.

Emphasis will be placed on experience and expertise in performing substantive work on projectsthat are of Similar Scope and Complexity, as described in the definitions above. The Districtreserves the right to award more points to projects that have more of the characteristics set forthin the definition of Projects of Similar Scope and Complexity. The District also reserves the rightto award more points to successful projects in which Design-Builder and/or its consultants and/orindividual Key Team Members had substantial responsibility for their respective scopes of work.

1. The Technical and Management Qualifications shall be provided on one (1) single sided A3(11 x 17) page. The A3 shall contain responses to:

a. Team Organization

b. Demonstrated History of Successful Projects of Similar Scope and Complexity

c. Project Management Experience

2. Resumes requirements are described in 4.b below.

3. The SOQ will be evaluated on the following technical and management qualifications:

Page 13 of 14

4. Team Organization

a. Provide an organization chart (showing Key Team Members and their Firmaffiliation) for all phases of the project from design through final acceptance andwarranty and maintenance period. Be certain to identify specific individuals forkey functions and show interrelationships and reporting hierarchy as well aspercentage of time committed for each Key Team Member for each phase of theProject. At a minimum identify the Key Team Members performing the followingfunctions:

i. Person responsible for the overall management of the design-buildeffort and contract;

ii. Person responsible for the design (lead architect andmechanical/plumbing/electrical consultants);

iii. Person responsible for overall construction and design managementeffort (Construction Project Manager);

iv. Person responsible for on-site field supervision and direction andconstruction (Superintendent);

v. Persons responsible for construction of the electrical and mechanicalsystems.

b. Provide a resume for all Key Team Members. Resumes should be no longer than1 page and must include the following information:

i. Description of the key individual’s proposed project role;

ii. Identification of employer and number of years employed by the firm;

iii. Educational background, professional licenses, and/or certifications;

iv. Experience relevant to their proposed role on the Project how theirexperience will benefit this project; and

v. Proposed percentage of time that the individual will be assigned to theProject.

c. Describe the Team’s experience working together and/or describe the steps theTeam has taken to promote integration and a collaborative working environment.The Owner reserves the right to award more points to those teams who haveexperience working together in a collaborative delivery model.

d. Demonstrated History of Successful Projects of Similar Scope and Complexity

i. Describe the Team’s experience in successfully managing design-build(or a similar integrated delivery model) Projects of Similar Scope andComplexity that include management and communications of anintegrated team of design consultants, specialty subcontractors, andtrade contractors. Include a description of any issues or problems thatarose on the projects and how those issues or problems were resolved.

ii. Describe the Team’s experience in developing integrated design andconstruction schedules for Projects of Similar Scope and Complexity.

iii. Describe the Team’s experience in developing and/or managing costswithin a Guaranteed Maximum Price.

Page 14 of 14

e. Identification of Projects of Similar Scope and Complexity

For each project identified in the SOQ (minimum of three required), provide thefollowing information. Only projects completed in the last 7 years are to beincluded. The information is to be provided in a separate table for the identifiedprojects. The projects will be evaluated in the context of the criteria set forth inSection IV.C.3.

i. Name of project;

ii. Owner/Customer;

iii. Location of project (include address);

iv. Description of the delivery method and integration of design andconstruction and identified the firm(s) role as a prime consultant, sub-consultant, contractor, subcontractor or other;

v. Project description, applicability, and relevance of the referencedproject to the evaluation criteria Project.

vi. Name of each Key Team Member who is proposed for this contract whoplayed a significant role on the project example, including a descriptionof their project responsibilities and functions;

vii. The initial contract price, the final contract price, and an explanation forany difference between the two amounts;

viii. The initial date scheduled for substantial completion, the actual date ofcompletion, and an explanation for any difference between the twodates; and

ix. Project contact of the owner or customer (current address, e-mail, andphone number) who can verify the characteristics of the submittedproject example.

5. Project Management Experience

a. Corporate Structure Questionnaire

i. Submit a completed Corporate Structure Questionnaire for Design-Builder.

SECTION VI – LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

A. Protest Procedures

B. Performance and Payment Bond Requirements and Statement

C. Insurance Requirements and Statement

D. Corporate Structure Questionnaire

E. District sustainability requirements can be found at:

http://www.spokanepfd.org/sustainable.php

[End of Request for Qualifications]

ATTACHMENT APROTESTS PROCEDURES

Spokane Public Facilities DistrictSportsplex Project

1. PURPOSE

To provide a prompt, fair and equitable administrative remedy to all Proposers and Prospective Proposersregarding the solicitation or procurement of a project, including but not limited to alleged substantiveerrors or omissions in the procurement documents, a decision by the District to award the Contract and/ornotice from the District that a Proposal is non-responsive or that a Proposer is not responsible.

2 . TIMING

Any actual or prospective Proposer showing a material economic interest in this Contract or who isaggrieved by either the solicitation or award of this Contract, may protest to the District, only in accordancewith the procedures set forth below.

A. Protests Based on the Form or Content of the Solicitation Documents: Any Protest based on theform or content of the solicitation documents, which is or should have been apparent prior to thedate established for submittal of Statements of Qualifications or Proposals, must be clearly labeledon the transmittal envelope as a “Protest” and filed as soon as practicable to:

Attention: Stephanie Curran, CEO

Spokane Public Facilities District

720 West Mallon Avenue

Spokane, WA 99201

No protest based on the form or content of the solicitation documents will be considered ifreceived by the District later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the specified submittal date. The“Solicitation Documents” includes all documents issued by the District in connection with thesolicitation of the project.

B. Other Protests: Protests based on any other circumstances must be received by the District at theaddress noted above in a transmittal envelope, clearly marked “Protest”, within four (4) businessdays from the date the Proposer was notified of any selection decision; provided, however, that inno event shall a protest be considered if all Proposals are rejected or if the protest is received afteraward of the Contract.

C. The District will not proceed from the Request for Qualifications phase to the Request for Proposalsphase until two business days after all Proposers are notified of the selection decision for the shortlisted Finalists. At the request of a Proposer not selected as a Finalist, the District will provide therequesting Proposer a scoring summary of the evaluation factors for that Proposer’s Statement ofQualifications.

D. The District will notify all Finalists of the selection decision and make a selection summary availableto all Finalists within two (2) business days of the notification. If the District receives a timelyprotest from a Finalist, the District will not execute a contract until two (2) business days after thefinal protest decisions is transmitted to the protestor.

3 . CONTENTS OF PROTEST

To be considered, a Protest shall be in writing and shall include: (1) the name, street address, fax numberand email address of the aggrieved party; (2) the name of the project for which the Protest is submitted; (3)

a detailed description of the specific grounds for the Protest and any supporting legal and/or factualdocumentation; and (4) the specific ruling or relief requested.

A. Decision by the District: The Protest shall be promptly considered on the written submittal by theDistrict CEO. The District CEO will give notice of the Protest and provide a copy to any others asrequired. In its sole discretion, the District CEO may give notice of the Protest to other interestedparties, including other Proposers. The District reserves the right to resolve or to attempt toresolve any Protest that concerns the form or content of the solicitation and which Protest wasreceived before the proposal evaluations through written addenda to the procurement documents.Any addenda will be provided to all parties who have obtained a copy of the solicitation from theDistrict.

B. The District CEO will issue a written decision on the Protest within two (2) business days followingthe receipt of the Protest, stating the reasons for the action taken. A copy of the decision shall beprovided to the aggrieved party, and any other party as may be required, including but not limitedto: (i) personal service, (ii) facsimile, or (iii) email, with telephonic confirmation.

C. The aggrieved party may appeal the decision of the District CEO through the judicial process. TheDistrict will stay award of the Contract for two (2) business days, following the issuance of itsdecision.

4 . JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

All judicial proceedings must be filed within four (4) business days of the issuance of the District’s decision.

5 . STRICT COMPLIANCE

Strict compliance with these protest procedures is essential in furtherance of the public interest. Anyaggrieved party that fails to comply strictly with these protest procedures is deemed, by such failure, tohave waived and relinquished forever any right or claim with respect to alleged irregularities in connectionwith the solicitation or award of the Contract. No person or party may pursue any judicial or administrativeproceedings challenging the solicitation or award of this Contract, without first exhausting theadministrative procedures specified herein.

6 . REPRESENTATION

An aggrieved party may participate personally or, if a corporation or other artificial person, by a dulyauthorized representative. Whether or not participating in person, an aggrieved party may be represented,at the party’s own expense, by counsel.

7 . COMPUTATION OF TIME

In computing any period of time prescribed by this procedure, the day of the act or event from which thedesignated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period shall be included.The term “business day” shall mean any day on which the District is open for regularly conducted business.Any document received after the close of regular business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) shall be deemedreceived the following business day.

8 . ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

By submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation, the Proposer acknowledges that it has reviewedand acquainted itself with the protest procedures herein and agrees to be bound by such procedures as acondition of submitting a proposal.

DBIA Document No 620 Page 1P erform anc e B ond forD esign-B u ild P rojec ts© 2015 Design-Build Institute of America

A TTA C H M ENT B

P ERFO RM A NC E A ND P A YM ENT B O ND FO RD ES IGN-B UIL D P RO JEC TS

D ES IGN-B UIL D ER/P RINC IP A L :(N ame and ad d res s )

S URETY:(N ame and c ontac tinformation)

O W NER/O B L IGEE :

S pokane P u blic Fac ilities D istric t7 20 W estM allon A venu eS pokane, W A 99201

P RO JEC T:

S pokane P u blic Fac ilities D istric tS portsplex P rojec t

D ES IGN-B UIL D A GREEM ENT:

Dated:

Amount:

B O ND D A TE :(N otearlierthan d ate ofD es ign-B u ild A greement)

B O ND A M O UNT: $35, 000 , 000

M O D IFIC A TIO NS TO TH IS B O ND :(L is tmod ific ations to this B ond below.Ifnone,write “N one”)

Page 2P erform anc e and P aym entB ond forD esign-B u ild P rojec ts

B O ND TERM S A ND C O ND ITIO NS

1 B ind ing Effec t. The Design-Builder and Surety, jointly and severally, bind themselves, theirheirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the Owner for the performance of the Design-Build Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference. The Design-Builder and Surety, jointly andseverally, bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to pay for labor,services, materials and equipment furnished by Claimants for use in the performance of the Design-BuildAgreement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

2 Intentof B ond . If the Design-Builder performs its obligations under the Design-Build Agreementpromptly makes payment of all sums for all labor, services, materials, and equipment furnished for use inthe performance of the Design-Build Agreement, then the Surety’s obligations under this Bond are nulland void, except to participate in meetings as provided in this Performance and Payment Bond.Otherwise the Surety’s obligations shall remain in full force and effect.

3 W aiverof Notic e. The Surety hereby waives notice of changes to the Design-Build Agreement,including changes within the general scope, or of time or price, or to related subcontracts or purchaseorders.

4 P ERFO RM A NC E B O ND4. 1 O wner’ s O bligations. If there is no default in Owner’s obligations under the Design-BuildAgreement, then the Surety's obligation under this Bond shall arise after the following steps havebeen taken by Owner, as a condition precedent to a Bond claim:

4. 1 . 1 The Owner has first provided written notice to the Design-Builder and Surety atthe addresses listed on page 1 of this Bond, that Owner is considering declaring theDesign-Builder in default and has requested and attempted to arrange a meeting with theDesign-Builder and Surety, to be held not later than fourteen (14) days after receipt ofOwner’s notice, to discuss methods of performing the Design-Builder’s obligations underthe Design-Build Agreement. If the Owner, Design-Builder and Surety agree, the Design-Builder shall be allowed a reasonable time to perform its obligations under the Design-Build Agreement, but such an agreement shall not waive the Owner’s right, if any,subsequently to declare the Design-Builder in default;

4. 1 . 2 The Owner declares the Design-Builder to be in default, terminates the Design-Build Agreement and notifies the Surety in writing; and

4. 1 . 3 The Owner has agreed to pay the balance remaining under the Design-BuildAgreement (i.e., the total amount payable by the Owner to the Design-Builder thereunderless amounts properly paid by the Owner to the Design-Builder, the “Contract Balance”)to:

. 1 The Surety, in accordance with the terms of the Design-Build Agreement;or. 2 Another design-builder selected pursuant to Section 4.1.3 to perform theremaining obligations under the Design-Build Agreement.

4. 2 S u rety’ s O bligations. When Owner has satisfied the conditions of Section 4.1, theSurety shall promptly take one of the following actions, at the Surety's expense:

4. 2 . 1 Arrange for the Design-Builder to perform and complete the remainingobligations under the Design-Build Agreement, with consent of Owner;

4. 2 . 2 Undertake to perform and complete the remaining obligations under the Design-Build Agreement itself, through its agents or through independent contractors;

4. 2 . 3 Obtain bids or negotiated proposals from qualified design-builders acceptable toOwner for a contract for performance and completion of the Design-Build Agreement,

Page 3P erform anc e and P aym entB ond forD esign-B u ild P rojec ts

arrange for a contract to be prepared for execution by Owner and a design-builderselected with Owner's concurrence, to be secured by performance and payment bondsequivalent to those for the Design-Build Agreement, issued by a qualified surety. TheSurety shall: a. make available as Work progresses sufficient funds to pay the cost ofcompletion of the Design-Build Agreement; and, b. pay to Owner the amount of damagesas described in Section 4.4;

4. 2 . 4 Waive its right to complete the Work under Sections 4.2.2 or 4.2.3, andreimburse the Owner the amount of its reasonable costs to complete the Work; or

4. 2 . 5 Deny liability, in whole or in part, and notify the Owner in writing, citing reasonstherefor.

4. 3 O wner’ s Rights. If the Surety does not proceed as provided in Section 4.2 withreasonable promptness, the Surety shall be deemed to be in default on this Bond seven (7) daysafter receipt of an additional written notice from the Owner to the Surety demanding that theSurety perform its obligations under this Bond and stating that the Owner shall be entitled toenforce any remedy available to the Owner. If the Surety proceeds as provided in Section 4.2.4,and the Owner refuses the payment, or the Surety has denied liability, in whole or in part, underSection 4.2.5, the Owner shall be entitled without further notice to enforce any remedy availableto it.

4. 4 D am ages C overed Und er the P erform anc e B ond . In any event, the Surety’sobligations to the Owner, and the Owner’s obligations to the Surety, shall not be greater thanthose of the Owner and Design-Builder to each other, respectively, under the Design-BuildAgreement. Subject to commitment by Owner to Payment of the Contract Balance, the Surety isobligated without duplication for:

4. 4. 1 The responsibilities of Design-Builder for correction of defective Work andcompletion of the Project;4. 4. 2 Additional legal, design professional and delay costs resulting from Design-Builder's default, and resulting from the actions or failure to act of Surety under Section4.2; and4. 4. 3 Liquidated damages, or if no liquidated damages are specified in the Design-Build Agreement, actual damages caused by delayed performance or non-performanceof Design-Builder.

4. 5 P erform anc e B ond L iability. If the Surety elects to act under Sections 4.2.1, 4.2.3 or4.2.4, the Surety’s total liability shall not exceed the Bond Amount.

4. 5. 1 The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner or others for obligations of theDesign-Builder that are unrelated to the Design-Build Agreement, and the ContractBalance shall not be reduced or set off on account of any such unrelated obligations.

5. P A YM ENT B O ND

5. 1 Notic e of C laim . Every Claimant who has not been paid in full before the expiration of aperiod of ninety (90) days after such Claimant provided or performed the last of the work, servicesor labor, or furnished the last of the materials or equipment for which said claim is made, mayhave a right of action on this Bond.

5. 1 . 1 Claimants shall provide written notice to the Surety and send a copy, or noticethereof, to Owner and Design-Builder, stating that a claim is being made under this Bondand, with substantial accuracy, the amount of the claim, and the last date such work,services or labor were performed, or the last materials or equipment were furnished infurtherance of the Design-Build Agreement.

Page 4P erform anc e and P aym entB ond forD esign-B u ild P rojec ts

5. 1 . 2 If Claimant does not have a direct contract with Design-Builder, the notice shallidentify the person or entity with whom Claimant contracted and who has not madepayment to Claimant.

5. 2 S u rety’ s O bligations. When a Claimant has satisfied the conditions of Section 5.1, theSurety shall promptly take the following actions at the Surety's expense:

5. 2 . 1 Send an answer to that Claimant, with a copy to the Owner and Design-Builder,within sixty (60) days after receipt of the claim, stating the amounts that are undisputedand the basis for challenging any disputed portions or amounts.

5. 2 . 2 Pay or arrange for payment of any undisputed amounts.

5. 3 B ond L iability. The Surety’s total obligation shall not exceed the Bond Amount, plus theamount of reasonable attorney’s fees provided for herein.

5. 3. 1 If the Surety fails to discharge its obligations under Sections 5.2.1 or 5.2.2, theSurety shall indemnify the Claimant for the reasonable attorney’s fees the Claimantincurs thereafter to successfully recover any sums found to be due and owing to theClaimant. If Claimant does not recover the entire amount claimed in its notice underSection 3, then such attorney’s fees shall be reduced in proportion to the amount actuallyrecovered.

5. 3. 2 The Surety shall not be liable to the Owner, Claimants or others for obligations ofthe Design-Builder that are unrelated to the Design-Build Agreement, and the ContractBalance shall not be reduced or set off on account of any such unrelated obligations.

6 B enefic iaries. No right of action shall accrue on this Bond to any person or entity other thanOwner or its heirs, executors, administrators, or successors, unless some other party is named in thisBond as a dual obligee.

7 D ispu te Resolu tion. All disputes related to this Bond shall be instituted in any court ofcompetent jurisdiction in the location in which the Project is located and shall be commenced within two(2) years after: a. the Owner declares the Design-Builder in default under Section 4.1.2 or there is aNotice of Claim under Section 5.2; or, b. Substantial Completion of the Project, whichever occurs first. Ifthe provisions of this Section are prohibited by law, the minimum period of limitation available to suretiesin the jurisdiction in which the Project is located shall be applicable.

7 . 1 In the event of bankruptcy of the Design-Builder, the Surety agrees that the Design-Builder is not a necessary or indispensable party to any legal action by Owner against Surety toenforce the Surety’s obligations under this Bond.

8 Notic e. Unless otherwise noted below, written notice under this Bond to Surety, Owner orDesign-Builder shall be mailed or delivered electronically or by hard mail to the contact information shownon page 1.(L is tany alternate c ontac tinformation below for notic e to the S u rety of any c laim on this B ond .If none, then u s e the c ontac tinformation on page 1)

For Claims on this Bond:(c hec kappropriate box)

□ Use the contact information shown on page 1; or □ Use the following alternate contact information: (fillin S u rety c laims ad minis tratorc ontac tinformation below)

9 S tatu tory C om plianc e. If this Bond has been furnished to comply with a statutory requirement inthe location where the Project is located, then any provision herein that conflicts with a statutoryrequirement shall be deemed deleted and replaced by provisions conforming to such statutoryrequirement. The intent is that this Bond shall be construed as a statutory bond conforming to theapplicable statutes.

Page 5P erform anc e and P aym entB ond forD esign-B u ild P rojec ts

10 W arranty O bligation. The Surety’s obligations to the Owner for warranties of the Design-Buildershall be the same as those required of the Design-Builder under the Design-Build Agreement, subject tothe time limitation in Section 7. Unless otherwise stated below, the Surety’s obligation for such warrantiesexcludes: a) products, materials or equipment covered by a manufacturer’s separate warranty; and b)claims by the Owner first noticed to Surety in writing more than one year after the effective date of suchwarranty as specified under the Design-Build Agreement.(L is tbelow any exc eptions to the above limitations on S u rety’s warranty obligation,ifany)

11 A u thorization. The Surety represents that it is admitted to act as an authorized corporate suretyin the state in which the Project is located. Surety and Design-Builder, intending to be legally boundhereby, subject to the terms set out above, do each cause this Performance Bond to be duly executed onits behalf by its authorized officer, agent, or representative.

D ES IGN-B UIL D ER (A S P RINC IP A L )Company:

S URETYCompany:

Signature: Signature:Name and Title: Name and Title:

Corporate Seal

(Attach Power of Attorney)

(Space is provided below for signatures of additional parties, if required.)

Attest:

Signature and Title

Sportsplex ProjectInsurance Exhibit

Design-Builder’s Insurance Requirements(The Parties are strongly encouraged to consult their insurance

advisors prior to completing this Exhibit)

1.0 Insurance Types and Limits

1.1 D es ign-B u ild er s hall pu rc has e and maintain ins u ranc e of the types , with limits of liability,c ontainings u c h end ors ements and s u bjec tto s u c hterms and c ond itions , as follows as wellas A rtic le 5 ofthe GeneralC ond itions ofC ontrac t:

Type of InsuranceMinimum Limits Required

P erC laim /O c c u rrenc eMinimum Limits RequiredA ggregate P olic y L im its

MaximumDeductible

1. W orker’ s C ompens ation S tatu tory L imits S tatu tory L imits

2. Employer’ s L iability (B od ily Inju ry byA c c id ent)

$2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ $50 , 0 0 0

a. B y D is eas e $2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ $50 , 0 0 0

b. Eac h A c c id ent $2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ $50 , 0 0 0

c. Eac hEmployee $2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ $50 , 0 0 0

3. C ommerc ialGeneralL iability $2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $4, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $50 , 0 0 0

a. B od ily Inju ry/P roperty D amage peroc c u rrenc e limit

$2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $4, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $50 , 0 0 0

b. B od ily Inju ry/P roperty D amageoc c u rrenc e limit

$2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $4, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $50 , 0 0 0

c. P rod u c ts /C ompleted O perationoc c u rrenc e L imit

$2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $4, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $50 , 0 0 0

d. P ers onaland A d vertis ingInju ryoc c u rrenc e L imit.

$2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $4, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $50 , 0 0 0

e. M ed ic alExpens e L imit(any onepers on)

$10 , 0 0 0 $ $

4. C ontrac tor's P rotec tive L iability (ifapplic able)

$ $ $

5. C ommerc ialA u tomobile L iability $2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ $50 , 0 0 0

6. P rofes s ionalErrors and O mis s ionspu rs u antto S ec tion 1 . 3 below (perc laim/aggregate)

$5, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ $50 , 0 0 0

7. C ontrac tor’ s P ollu tion L iability inc lu d ingc overage formic robialmatter(ifapplic able)

$2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ $50 , 0 0 0

8. Umbrella Exc es s L iability Ins u ranc e $10 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $10 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $

9. O therC overages Req u ired on a P rojec tS pec ific B as is (e. g. A irc raftL iability)

$ $ $

ATTACHMENT C

1.2 The ins u ranc e req u ired by this S ec tion 1 s hallbe written for notles s than limits of liabilitys pec ified in the table above or req u ired by law, whic hever c overage is greater. C overages , s hallbewritten on an oc c u rrenc e bas is , s hallbe maintained withou tinterru ption from d ate of c ommenc ementofthe W orku ntild ate ofFinalP aymentand m u s tbe perprojec t.

1.3 The req u irementfor profes s ionalliability c overage on this P rojec ts hallbe the s tand ard formprac tic e polic y provid ed by D es ign C ons u ltant. D es ign-B u ild er s hallprovid e O wner with prior writtennotic e of any c anc ellation ornon-renewalof the D es ign C ons u ltant’ s prac tic e polic y and s hallinc lu d e inthe D es ign C ons u ltantA greementa provis ion req u iring the D es ign C ons u ltantto give the D es ign-B u ild er15 D ays written notic e ofany c anc ellation ornon-renewal. The D es ign C ons u ltant’ s prac tic e polic y mu s t:(a)permitreporting of c irc u ms tanc es thatc ou ld give ris e to a c laim ; and (b)provid e c overage forpos t-expiration c laims res u ltingfrom s u c h c irc u ms tanc es

1.4 A ny c overage req u ired to be maintained afterFinalP ayments hallbe id entified below.

Term of ins u ranc e c overage: D es ign-B u ild er s hallmaintain the following ins u ranc e c overaged u ringthe W orkand forone yearafterFinalA c c eptanc e, inc lu d ingins u ranc e c overage d u ringtheperformanc e ofany c orrec tive W ork.

1 . GeneralL iability Ins u ranc e: C ommerc ialGeneralL iability (C GL )on an O c c u rrenc e Form .C overage s hallinc lu d e, bu tnotbe limited to:

a. C ompleted operations /prod u c ts liability;

b. Explos ion, c ollaps e, and u nd ergrou nd ; and

c . Employer's liability c overage.

2 . A u tomobile L iability Ins u ranc e: A u tomobile liability

1.5 O wners hallobtain C ou rs e of C ons tru c tion (c ommonly referred to “B u ild er’ s Ris k”)ins u ranc e inan amou nteq u alto the fu llins u rable valu e of the W ork inc lu s ive of earthqu ake and flood , s u bjec ttod ed u c tibles , notto exc eed $10 , 0 0 0 as d etermined by O wner. D es ign-B u ild ers hallbe res pons ible to paythe ins u ranc e d ed u c tible. N otwiths tand ing the above, D es ign-B u ild ers hallgu ard agains tthe perils offireand phys ic allos s ord amage from theft, vand alis m , malic iou s mis c hief, c ollaps e, fals e work, inc lu d inglos sord amage to temporary bu ild ings , eq u ipment, materials orotheritems plac ed atthe P rojec ts ite, D es ign-B u ild er prior to c ommenc ing c ons tru c tion ac tivities s hallprovid e O wner with a S ec u rity P lan for reviewand approvalin O wner’ s reas onable d is c retion.

2.0 Endorsements and Certificates

2.1 C ommerc ialGeneralL iability Ins u ranc e s hallbe written on an oc c u rrenc e bas is , u tilizings tand ardIS O u nmod ified c overage form oreq u ivalent. End ors ements exc lu d ing, res tric ting, or limiting c overagemay be ac c eptable u nd er c ertain c irc u ms tanc es provid ed the s ame are agreed u pon by O wner andD es ign-B u ild er. Forexample, N u c learEnergy Exc lu s ions and thos e Exc lu s ionary End ors ements relatingto P ollu tants , A s bes tos , L ead , etc . may be ac c eptable d epend ing on projec tparameters and the grantofc overage thatis provid ed fors u c h expos u res u nd erthe P rofes s ionalL iability and C ontrac tors P ollu tionL iability polic ies .

2.2 GeneralL iability, A u tomobile L iability, Employers L iability and Umbrella Exc es s L iability polic iess halleac hinc lu d e the followingend ors ements :

.1 UnintentionalErrors and O mis s ions End ors ement

.2 N otic e ofO c c u rrenc e End ors ement

.3 Knowled ge ofO c c u rrenc e End ors ement

2.3 C ommerc ial A u tomobile L iability c overage s hall be provid ed by s tand ard IS O C ommerc ialA u tomobile orTru c kers P olic y c overingallO wned , N on-O wned and H ired Vehic les .

2.4 Umbrella/Exc es s L iability mu s t s c hed u le C ommerc ial General L iability, A u tomobile/Tru c kersL iability and Employers L iability as u nd erlying polic ies . The Umbrella/Exc es s L iability polic ies s hallbewritten in ac c ord anc e with the s c hed u led u nd erlying polic ies and m u s tbe as broad as the u nd erlyingpolic ies .

2.5 C ontrac tors P ollu tion L iability s halleitherbe written on an oc c u rrenc e or c laims -mad e bas is . Ifc overage in whole or in partis written on a c laims -mad e bas is , the polic y mu s t: (a)permitreporting ofc irc u ms tanc es thatc ou ld give ris e to a c laim ; and (b)provid e c overage forpos t-expiration c laims res u ltingfrom s u c h c irc u ms tanc es .

2.5.1 The polic y is to provid e c overage for off-s ite Trans portation by allapplic able mod es ofc onveyanc e. W hen req u ired , c overage is als o to be provid ed for c laims involving materials

removed from the s ite and brou ghtto off-s ite D is pos al, Treatmentand S torage fac ilities .

2.5.2 A ny res tric tion, limitation, orexc lu s ion related to N atu rally O c c u rring S u bs tanc es m u s tbemod ified s o as notto apply to the releas e of s u c h N atu rally O c c u rring S u bs tanc es as a res u ltof

the performanc e ofO perations .

3.0 Additional Insureds

3.1 O wner, S pokane C ou nty, the C ity of S pokane and its offic ers , d irec tors and employees s hallbeinc lu d ed as an ad d itional ins u red on generalliability, u mbrella and au tomobile liability polic ies ofins u ranc e ofthe D es ign-B u ild erand its S u bc ontrac tors and D es ign C ons u ltants atany tier. Ifreq u ired , ass et forth above, O wner s hall als o be inc lu d ed as an ad d itional ins u red on the D es ign-B u ild er’ sC ontrac tor’ s P ollu tion L iability polic y ofins u ranc e. A ny c overage granted to an ad d itionalins u red s hallbeprimary and thatc overage ind epend ently c arried by an ad d itionalins u red s hallnotc ontribu te. D es ign-B u ild er s hallfu rnis h to O wner a c opy of allC ertific ates of Ins u ranc e s howing the O wner as ad d itionalins u red as s etforth above. D es ign-B u ild ers hallreq u ire S u bc ontrac tors and D es ign C ons u ltants of anytierto fu rnis hs u c h c ertific ates , and u pon req u es tofthe s ame willfu rnis hthem to the O wner. O wners hallnotbe an ad d itionalins u red on any other of D es ign-B u ild er’ s polic ies exc eptfor thos e whic h ares pec ific ally lis ted below:

3.2 A d d itionalIns u red c overage provid ed u nd er the C ommerc ialGeneralL iability Umbrella/Exc es sand , if applic able, D es ign-B u ild er’ s C ontrac tor’ s P ollu tion L iability polic ies , s hall c over both thepremis es /operations and c ompleted operations hazard s .

4.0 Terms and Effective Dates

4.1 See section 2.1, above

4.2 Ifthe C ontrac tor’ s P ollu tion P olic y is mad e on a c laims -mad e bas is , the polic y d ate orRetroac tiveD ate s hallpred ate the A greement. The termination d ate of the polic y orapplic able extend ed reportingperiod s hallbe no earlier than the termination d ate of c overages req u ired to be maintained after finalpaymentis mad e.

4.3 P rofes s ionalL iability c overage s hallbe retroac tive to the d ate thatprofes s ionals ervic es firs tc ommenc ed .

4.4 If the P rofes s ionalL iability c overage is provid ed on a P rojec ts pec ific bas is its hallinc lu d e anextend ed reporting period of 3 years beyond the d ate for S u bs tantialC ompletion of the P rojec tu nles sotherwis e s pec ified .

A TTA C H M ENT DC O RP O RA TE S TRUC TURE Q UES TIO NA IRE

S pokane P u blic Fac ilities D istric tS portsplex P rojec t

1. Proposers shall complete the following information for the Proposed Design-Builder and all proposed Design-Build Team Members:

Legal Name

Street Address

Mailing Address

Point of Contact

Position

Email

Telephone Number

Fax Number

Type of Business

D-U-N-S Number

Federal Tax Identification Number

Washington State Contractor’s Registration Number (ifapplicable)

Washington State Unified Business Identifier Number

2. If the Proposed Design-Builder is a Joint Venture, Proposers must:

a. Submit the above information the Joint Venture as well as for each member of the Joint Venture; and

b. Attach a copy of the Joint Venture Agreement to this form.

A T T ACHM EN T E

Districtsustainability requirem entscanbefoundat:http://w w w .spokanepfd.org/sustainable.php.